Guerilla Open Access Manifesto | |
Information is power. But like all power, there are those who want to keep it for | |
themselves. The world's entire scientific and cultural heritage, published over centuries | |
in books and journals, is increasingly being digitized and locked up by a handful of | |
private corporations. Want to read the papers featuring the most famous results of the | |
sciences? You'll need to send enormous amounts to publishers like Reed Elsevier. | |
There are those struggling to change this. The Open Access Movement has fought | |
valiantly to ensure that scientists do not sign their copyrights away but instead ensure | |
their work is published on the Internet, under terms that allow anyone to access it. But | |
even under the best scenarios, their work will only apply to things published in the future. | |
Everything up until now will have been lost. | |
That is too high a price to pay. Forcing academics to pay money to read the work of their | |
colleagues? Scanning entire libraries but only allowing the folks at Google to read them? | |
Providing scientific articles to those at elite universities in the First World, but not to | |
children in the Global South? It's outrageous and unacceptable. | |
"I agree," many say, "but what can we do? The companies hold the copyrights, they | |
make enormous amounts of money by charging for access, and it's perfectly legal — | |
there's nothing we can do to stop them." But there is something we can, something that's | |
already being done: we can fight back. | |
Those with access to these resources — students, librarians, scientists — you have been | |
given a privilege. You get to feed at this banquet of knowledge while the rest of the world | |
is locked out. But you need not — indeed, morally, you cannot — keep this privilege for | |
yourselves. You have a duty to share it with the world. And you have: trading passwords | |
with colleagues, filling download requests for friends. | |
Meanwhile, those who have been locked out are not standing idly by. You have been | |
sneaking through holes and climbing over fences, liberating the information locked up by | |
the publishers and sharing them with your friends. | |
But all of this action goes on in the dark, hidden underground. It's called stealing or | |
piracy, as if sharing a wealth of knowledge were the moral equivalent of plundering a | |
ship and murdering its crew. But sharing isn't immoral — it's a moral imperative. Only | |
those blinded by greed would refuse to let a friend make a copy. | |
Large corporations, of course, are blinded by greed. The laws under which they operate | |
require it — their shareholders would revolt at anything less. And the politicians they | |
have bought off back them, passing laws giving them the exclusive power to decide who | |
can make copies. | |
There is no justice in following unjust laws. It's time to come into the light and, in the | |
grand tradition of civil disobedience, declare our opposition to this private theft of public | |
culture. | |
We need to take information, wherever it is stored, make our copies and share them with | |
the world. We need to take stuff that's out of copyright and add it to the archive. We need | |
to buy secret databases and put them on the Web. We need to download scientific | |
journals and upload them to file sharing networks. We need to fight for Guerilla Open | |
Access. | |
With enough of us, around the world, we'll not just send a strong message opposing the | |
privatization of knowledge — we'll make it a thing of the past. Will you join us? | |
Aaron Swartz | |
July 2008, Eremo, Italy |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment