Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@atk
Forked from 140bytes/LICENSE.txt
Created June 19, 2011 16:34
Show Gist options
  • Star 2 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 1 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save atk/1034458 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save atk/1034458 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
polyfill an ES5-compatibile Array.prototype.lastIndexOf where needed.

Polyfill for ES5: Array.prototype.lastIndexOf

A tweet-sized ES5-compatible polyfill for Array.prototype.lastIndexOf based on a similar function in my own tiny.js

// avoid overwriting Array.prototype.lastIndexOf
// otherwise it becomes enumerable, which leads to
// errors in Chrome
[].lastIndexOf || (Array.prototype.lastIndexOf = function(
a, // item to be found
b // index placeholder
) {
for (
// initialize index
b=this.length;
// if the index decreased by one is not already -1
// index is not set (sparse array)
// and the item at index is not identical to the searched one
~--b && (!(b in a) || this[b] !== a););
// return index of last found item or -1
return b
})
[].lastIndexOf||(Array.prototype.lastIndexOf=function(a,b){for(b=this.length;~--b&&(!(b in a)||this[b]!==a););return b})
DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE
Version 2, December 2004
Copyright (C) 2011 Alex Kloss <alexthkloss@web.de>
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim or modified
copies of this license document, and changing it is allowed as long
as the name is changed.
DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE
TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION
0. You just DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO.
{
"name": "lastIndexOf",
"description": "polyfill an ES5-compatibile Array.prototype.lastIndexOf where needed.",
"keywords": [
"array",
"lastIndexof",
"es5",
"polyfill"
]
}
<!DOCTYPE html>
<title>Foo</title>
<div>Expected value: <b>0,1,2,-1</b></div>
<div>Actual value: <b id="ret"></b></div>
<script>
var lastIndexOf =
[].lastIndexOf||(Array.prototype.lastIndexOf=function(a,b){for(b=this.length;~--b&&(!(b in a)||this[b]!==a););return b})
var testdata=[1,2,3,5];
document.getElementById( "ret" ).innerHTML = [lastIndexOf.call(testdata,1), lastIndexOf.call(testdata,2), lastIndexOf.call(testdata,3), lastIndexOf.call(testdata,4)];
</script>
@wrayal
Copy link

wrayal commented Jun 20, 2011

Can I ask a stupid question here? What is the exact function of !== (as opposed to !=)? I mean, I guess it negates == but I'm not clear on the exact differences - could you clarify at all?

@atk
Copy link
Author

atk commented Jun 20, 2011

No question is ever stupid, only the notion that it could be is. !== is the opposite of ===, meaning a typesafe not equal comparison: if the types and the compared objects are the same, it yields false. If one "=" was omitted, the comparison would not be typesafe anymore, so same values of different types, e.g. 0 != "0" would be false while 0 !== "0" was true.

@jed
Copy link

jed commented Jul 11, 2011

hey @atk, could you fix your package.json here too?

@jdalton
Copy link

jdalton commented Aug 21, 2011

Despite the description, polyfill an ES5-compatibile Array.prototype.lastIndexOf where needed., this is not an ES5 compatible fallback because it lacks sparse array support and resolves the length incorrectly. Also browsers like Chrome have a bug where Array.prototype.lastIndexOf = [].lastIndexOf will cause Array#lastIndexOf to become enumerable.

@tsaniel
Copy link

tsaniel commented Dec 5, 2011

Seems we don't need b?

function(a,c){for(c=this.length;this[--c]!==a&&~c;);return c}

@atk
Copy link
Author

atk commented Dec 5, 2011

Now we have as much ES5-compatibility as possible; the length is resolved correctly, sparse arrays are taken care of and the Chrome bug is resolved by the more secure shim logic.

@jdalton
Copy link

jdalton commented Dec 5, 2011

This is still missing fromIndex support.

@tsaniel
Copy link

tsaniel commented Dec 5, 2011

What about

function(a,b){for(++b>0?0:b=this.length+~~b;~--b&&(!(b in this)||this[b]!==a););return b}

?

Updated.

@tsaniel
Copy link

tsaniel commented Dec 5, 2011

I think it still has room to be shortened.

@atk
Copy link
Author

atk commented Dec 9, 2011

@tsaniel: nice one! I think that'll work!

@tsaniel
Copy link

tsaniel commented Dec 9, 2011

By the way, i wonder if

[].lastIndexOf||(Array.prototype.lastIndexOf=...)

and

[].lastIndexOf?0:Array.prototype.lastIndexOf=...

are equal.

@jdalton
Copy link

jdalton commented Dec 9, 2011

@tsaniel It's not clamping the fromIndex correctly:

5: If argument fromIndex was passed let n be ToInteger(fromIndex); else let n be len.
6: If n ≥ 0, then let k be min(n, len – 1).
7: Else, n < 0
---- a. Let k be len - abs(n).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment