bisectable6

query

old=2016.10 say 42 x Nil

result

Bisecting: 231 revisions left to test after this (roughly 8 steps)
[75f154760ddc7bf5e5ee2b4efd0de03489481294] Merge pull request #915 from cpin/duckmap-structure
»»»»» Testing 75f154760ddc7bf5e5ee2b4efd0de03489481294
»»»»» Script output:

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
Use of Nil in numeric context
  in block <unit> at /tmp/j0CEu7jna7 line 1

»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing fb0c648447b5eabf1c4739d03c75becbdb0a7d99
»»»»» Script output:

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
Use of Nil in numeric context
  in block <unit> at /tmp/j0CEu7jna7 line 1

»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 04b6da1d8304497a031035cbf5fc98bfd29ee783
»»»»» Script output:

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
Use of Nil in numeric context
  in block <unit> at /tmp/j0CEu7jna7 line 1

»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 94d73091fa49c3ff950954dfc52e0d090e31e6eb
»»»»» Script output:

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
Use of Nil in numeric context
  in block <unit> at /tmp/j0CEu7jna7 line 1

»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing b4fe68080269c4b48ae853d71d47a4848e5b846b
»»»»» Script output:

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
Use of Nil in numeric context
  in block <unit> at /tmp/j0CEu7jna7 line 1

»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 2dd0ddbbc2910564d08a9e0ac0cda15c7c2527fc
»»»»» Script output:

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
Use of Nil in numeric context
  in block <unit> at /tmp/j0CEu7jna7 line 1

»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 34e515d64025e2af7fa81a6a57bcda6b5078c0d5
»»»»» Script output:
Use of Nil in numeric context
  in block <unit> at /tmp/j0CEu7jna7 line 1

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
Use of Nil in numeric context
  in block <unit> at /tmp/j0CEu7jna7 line 1

»»»»» The output is identical
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 2b5226ccd35d26583849d2ddcfc9c70960dd11d5
»»»»» Script output:
Use of Nil in numeric context
  in block <unit> at /tmp/j0CEu7jna7 line 1

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
Use of Nil in numeric context
  in block <unit> at /tmp/j0CEu7jna7 line 1

»»»»» The output is identical
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing ae1f2f87385e86fc842fadab368a6db1250173be
»»»»» Script output:
Use of Nil in numeric context
  in block <unit> at /tmp/j0CEu7jna7 line 1

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
Use of Nil in numeric context
  in block <unit> at /tmp/j0CEu7jna7 line 1

»»»»» The output is identical
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2dd0ddbbc2910564d08a9e0ac0cda15c7c2527fc is the first new commit
commit 2dd0ddbbc2910564d08a9e0ac0cda15c7c2527fc
Author: Zoffix Znet <cpan@zoffix.com>
Date:   Sun Oct 16 18:37:05 2016 -0400

    Fix infix:<x> accidentally silencing failures
    
    An earlier fix[^1] to interpret type objects as 0 iterations had an unintended
    effect that Failures from the coercion of the RHS argument to Int would also be
    silently treaded as 0.
    
    Add a separate multi for type objects to handle that case, leaving
    coercion Failures able to freely explode.
    
    Fixes RT#129899: https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=129899
    [1] https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/2311372b5fde9c6b1801cf00840ed8c51bc75a69

:040000 040000 b34d281beb6e553bf618ef0edfcc4450b612922b 94b075927ddb169ef4c65f9c491bf64ea07d224b M	src