Created
January 27, 2017 01:49
-
-
Save Whateverable/4e26fa248358385f68312fffe7729bcc to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
bisectable6
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
$++ for '/home/bisectable/.bash_history'.IO.lines.batch(30) |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Bisecting: 1624 revisions left to test after this (roughly 11 steps) | |
[88f6f8491027baf4fbab89686da0c5354a269268] Done .done $status before then emitting to it. | |
»»»»» Testing 88f6f8491027baf4fbab89686da0c5354a269268 | |
»»»»» Script output: | |
Method 'batch' not found for invocant of class 'Seq' | |
in block <unit> at /tmp/DpD9qFXiR3 line 1 | |
»»»»» Script exit code: 1 | |
»»»»» Bisecting by output | |
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is: | |
Method 'batch' not found for invocant of class 'Seq' | |
in block <unit> at /tmp/DpD9qFXiR3 line 1 | |
»»»»» The output is identical | |
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old” | |
»»»»» ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |
»»»»» Testing 03a28973e7f8f685b9122fdce6b2f90ac9c688d7 | |
»»»»» Script output: | |
No such method 'batch' for invocant of type 'Seq' | |
in block <unit> at /tmp/DpD9qFXiR3 line 1 | |
»»»»» Script exit code: 1 | |
»»»»» Bisecting by output | |
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is: | |
Method 'batch' not found for invocant of class 'Seq' | |
in block <unit> at /tmp/DpD9qFXiR3 line 1 | |
»»»»» The output is different | |
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new” | |
»»»»» ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |
»»»»» Testing 3448c71030caf5ec9304adf47c08d268e3335d2b | |
»»»»» Script output: | |
Method 'batch' not found for invocant of class 'Seq' | |
in block <unit> at /tmp/DpD9qFXiR3 line 1 | |
»»»»» Script exit code: 1 | |
»»»»» Bisecting by output | |
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is: | |
Method 'batch' not found for invocant of class 'Seq' | |
in block <unit> at /tmp/DpD9qFXiR3 line 1 | |
»»»»» The output is identical | |
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old” | |
»»»»» ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |
»»»»» Testing c9a24d9d1d71a4d45b63904ee075e46657548461 | |
»»»»» Script output: | |
No such method 'batch' for invocant of type 'Seq' | |
in block <unit> at /tmp/DpD9qFXiR3 line 1 | |
»»»»» Script exit code: 1 | |
»»»»» Bisecting by output | |
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is: | |
Method 'batch' not found for invocant of class 'Seq' | |
in block <unit> at /tmp/DpD9qFXiR3 line 1 | |
»»»»» The output is different | |
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new” | |
»»»»» ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |
»»»»» Testing f4a8a69e53b82a4b9a1429052f38b3b03f93e503 | |
»»»»» Script output: | |
No such method 'batch' for invocant of type 'Seq' | |
in block <unit> at /tmp/DpD9qFXiR3 line 1 | |
»»»»» Script exit code: 1 | |
»»»»» Bisecting by output | |
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is: | |
Method 'batch' not found for invocant of class 'Seq' | |
in block <unit> at /tmp/DpD9qFXiR3 line 1 | |
»»»»» The output is different | |
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new” | |
»»»»» ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |
»»»»» Testing 46e0edebc593d32dfe412b82713974bd5ee08fa8 | |
»»»»» Script output: | |
No such method 'batch' for invocant of type 'Seq' | |
in block <unit> at /tmp/DpD9qFXiR3 line 1 | |
»»»»» Script exit code: 1 | |
»»»»» Bisecting by output | |
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is: | |
Method 'batch' not found for invocant of class 'Seq' | |
in block <unit> at /tmp/DpD9qFXiR3 line 1 | |
»»»»» The output is different | |
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new” | |
»»»»» ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |
»»»»» Testing c1b987853c6c8f3ca0f8845bd1409af226d9a747 | |
»»»»» Script output: | |
No such method 'batch' for invocant of type 'Seq' | |
in block <unit> at /tmp/DpD9qFXiR3 line 1 | |
»»»»» Script exit code: 1 | |
»»»»» Bisecting by output | |
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is: | |
Method 'batch' not found for invocant of class 'Seq' | |
in block <unit> at /tmp/DpD9qFXiR3 line 1 | |
»»»»» The output is different | |
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new” | |
»»»»» ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |
»»»»» Testing f0b3b59ec0fe9962769212962806d1e66ec752d6 | |
»»»»» Script output: | |
Method 'batch' not found for invocant of class 'Seq' | |
in block <unit> at /tmp/DpD9qFXiR3 line 1 | |
»»»»» Script exit code: 1 | |
»»»»» Bisecting by output | |
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is: | |
Method 'batch' not found for invocant of class 'Seq' | |
in block <unit> at /tmp/DpD9qFXiR3 line 1 | |
»»»»» The output is identical | |
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old” | |
»»»»» ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |
»»»»» Testing 447d592693278186a5fe90e3ed32c4c4806b6d9a | |
»»»»» Script output: | |
Method 'batch' not found for invocant of class 'Seq' | |
in block <unit> at /tmp/DpD9qFXiR3 line 1 | |
»»»»» Script exit code: 1 | |
»»»»» Bisecting by output | |
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is: | |
Method 'batch' not found for invocant of class 'Seq' | |
in block <unit> at /tmp/DpD9qFXiR3 line 1 | |
»»»»» The output is identical | |
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old” | |
»»»»» ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |
»»»»» Testing faaa51601ae4893f63a336e051ab454373aae42d | |
»»»»» Script output: | |
No such method 'batch' for invocant of type 'Seq' | |
in block <unit> at /tmp/DpD9qFXiR3 line 1 | |
»»»»» Script exit code: 1 | |
»»»»» Bisecting by output | |
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is: | |
Method 'batch' not found for invocant of class 'Seq' | |
in block <unit> at /tmp/DpD9qFXiR3 line 1 | |
»»»»» The output is different | |
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new” | |
»»»»» ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |
»»»»» Testing 6ef4cdf543e3c58084351679e0041c0457d9218a | |
»»»»» Script output: | |
No such method 'batch' for invocant of type 'Seq' | |
in block <unit> at /tmp/DpD9qFXiR3 line 1 | |
»»»»» Script exit code: 1 | |
»»»»» Bisecting by output | |
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is: | |
Method 'batch' not found for invocant of class 'Seq' | |
in block <unit> at /tmp/DpD9qFXiR3 line 1 | |
»»»»» The output is different | |
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new” | |
»»»»» ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |
»»»»» Testing 222d16b0b94911fdedb06ee6ad817d0f14b9c05c | |
»»»»» Script output: | |
No such method 'batch' for invocant of type 'Seq' | |
in block <unit> at /tmp/DpD9qFXiR3 line 1 | |
»»»»» Script exit code: 1 | |
»»»»» Bisecting by output | |
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is: | |
Method 'batch' not found for invocant of class 'Seq' | |
in block <unit> at /tmp/DpD9qFXiR3 line 1 | |
»»»»» The output is different | |
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new” | |
»»»»» ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |
222d16b0b94911fdedb06ee6ad817d0f14b9c05c is the first new commit | |
commit 222d16b0b94911fdedb06ee6ad817d0f14b9c05c | |
Author: Stefan Seifert <nine@detonation.org> | |
Date: Tue Sep 27 13:15:02 2016 +0200 | |
Actually throw a typed "method not found" exception from the VM | |
We used to throw an AdHoc exception and parse the message to upgrade it | |
to a typed exception. The need for that is not obvious and the spectest | |
passes just fine if we throw the proper exception type in the first | |
place. | |
:040000 040000 63ad71143a7117adca7cda1f9c91b100ec142e9f 446617941271f4d4435a6e35046d17d7564e6f83 M src |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment