When making this website, i wanted a simple, reasonable way to make it look good on most displays. Not counting any minimization techniques, the following 58 bytes worked well for me:
main {
max-width: 38rem;
padding: 2rem;
margin: auto;
}
None of the string methods modify this
– they always return fresh strings.
charAt(pos: number): string
ES1
Returns the character at index pos
, as a string (JavaScript does not have a datatype for characters). str[i]
is equivalent to str.charAt(i)
and more concise (caveat: may not work on old engines).
In your command-line run the following commands:
brew doctor
brew update
https://gist.github.com/ljharb/58faf1cfcb4e6808f74aae4ef7944cff
While attempting to explain JavaScript's reduce
method on arrays, conceptually, I came up with the following - hopefully it's helpful; happy to tweak it if anyone has suggestions.
JavaScript Arrays have lots of built in methods on their prototype. Some of them mutate - ie, they change the underlying array in-place. Luckily, most of them do not - they instead return an entirely distinct array. Since arrays are conceptually a contiguous list of items, it helps code clarity and maintainability a lot to be able to operate on them in a "functional" way. (I'll also insist on referring to an array as a "list" - although in some languages, List
is a native data type, in JS and this post, I'm referring to the concept. Everywhere I use the word "list" you can assume I'm talking about a JS Array) This means, to perform a single operation on the list as a whole ("atomically"), and to return a new list - thus making it mu
function mapValues(obj, fn) { | |
return Object.keys(obj).reduce((result, key) => { | |
result[key] = fn(obj[key], key); | |
return result; | |
}, {}); | |
} | |
function pick(obj, fn) { | |
return Object.keys(obj).reduce((result, key) => { | |
if (fn(obj[key])) { |