Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@MNoichl

MNoichl/.block

Last active January 28, 2018 18:20
Show Gist options
  • Star 0 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save MNoichl/03a8bdf7fb7f079735be034ce9376e02 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save MNoichl/03a8bdf7fb7f079735be034ce9376e02 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Download ZIP
PCA Philososophy-Articles clickable
Raw
.block
license: mit
Raw
README.md

A Principle Component Analysis of the Citation-Data of 2000 Philosophy-Articles from the 90s. Clusters are generated with K-Means.

PerformanceVector: Avg. within cluster similarity: 22.989 Avg. within cluster similarity for cluster 0: 29.944 Avg. within cluster similarity for cluster 1: 39.114 Avg. within cluster similarity for cluster 2: 15.005 Avg. within cluster similarity for cluster 3: 20.072 Avg. within cluster similarity for cluster 4: 31.659 Avg. within cluster similarity for cluster 5: 13.399 Avg. within cluster similarity for cluster 6: 17.724

The Scatterplot is forked from peterssonjonas's block: D3 Zoomable Scatterplot

forked from MNoichl's block: PCA Philososophy-Articles

forked from MNoichl's block: PCA Philososophy-Articles

forked from MNoichl's block: PCA Philososophy-Articles

Raw
cereal.csv
We can't make this file beautiful and searchable because it's too large.
"pc_1","pc_2","NR","TC","Z9","U1","U2","PY","VL","IS","BP","EP","PG","PT","AU","BA","BE","GP","AF","BF","CA","TI","SO","SE","BS","LA","DT","CT","CY","CL","SP","HO","DE","ID","AB","C1","RP","EM","RI","OI","FU","FX","CR","PU","PI","PA","SN","EI","BN","J9","JI","PD","PN","SU","SI","MA","AR","DI","D2","EA","EY","WC","SC","GA","UT","PM","OA","HC","HP","DA","id","text","cluster"
-2.1481963532910267,-1.8536403963010373,119.0,280.0,281.0,2.0,6.0,1995.0,104.0,414.0,235.0,329.0,95.0,"J","EDGINGTON, D",,,,"EDGINGTON, D",,,"ON CONDITIONALS","MIND",,,"English","Review",,,,,,,"PROBABILITIES; COUNTERFACTUALS; DEPENDENCE",,,"EDGINGTON, D (reprint author), UNIV LONDON BIRKBECK COLL,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,MALET ST,LONDON WC1E 7HX,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"Adams E., 1975, LOGIC CONDITIONALS; ADAMS EW, 1993, PAC PHILOS QUART, V74, P1; ADAMS EW, 1970, FDN LANGUAGE, V6, P89; ADAMS EW, 1966, ASPECTS INDUCTIVE LO, P256; Adams E.W., 1965, INQUIRY, V8, P166; Anderson Alan Ross, 1951, ANALYSIS, V12, P35; APPIAH A, 1986, PHILOS REV, V95, P209, DOI 10.2307/2185590 ; APPIAH A, 1985, ASSERTION CONDITIONA; AYERS MR, 1965, MIND, V74, P347; BAYES T, 1940, T ROYAL SOC LONDON, V53, P370; BENNETT J, 1995, MIND, V104, P331, DOI 10.1093/mind/104.414.331 ; BENNETT J, 1988, MIND, V97, P509; BENNETT J, 1984, PHILOS REV, V93, P57, DOI 10.2307/2184413 ; Bennett J., 1974, CANADIAN J PHILOS, V4, P381; Bernoulli J., 1713, ARS CONJECTANDI; Black Max, 1950, PHILOS ANAL; Blackburn S. W., 1986, MEANING INTERPRETATI, P201; Burton D. M., 1980, ELEMENTARY NUMBER TH; CARLSTROM IF, 1978, PHILOS SCI, V45, P155, DOI 10.1086/288791 ; CARNAP R., 1936, PHILOS SCI, V4, P1; [Anonymous], 1936, PHILOS SCI, VIII, P419, DOI DOI 10.1086/286432; Chisholm R. M., 1946, MIND, V55, P289; DALE AJ, 1985, ANALYSIS, V45, P179, DOI 10.2307/3327355; Davidson D., 1980, ESSAYS ACTIONS EVENT, P207; Deming W., 1940, FACSIMILES 2 PAPERS; DUDMAN VH, 1986, THEORIA, V52, P168; DUDMAN VH, 1989, MIND, V98, P591; DUDMAN VH, 1992, ANALYSIS, V52, P204, DOI 10.2307/3328336 ; DUDMAN VH, 1994, J PHILOS, V91, P113, DOI 10.2307/2940989 ; DUDMAN VH, 1987, ANALYSIS, V47, P74, DOI 10.2307/3328859 ; DUDMAN VH, 1984, ANALYSIS, V44, P145, DOI 10.2307/3327374 ; Dudman V. H., 1984, AUSTR J LINGUISTICS, V4, P143; Dudman V. C., 1983, AUSTR J LINGUISTICS, V3, P25; DUMMETT M, 1992, LOGICAL BASIS METAPH; Dummett M., 1978, TRUTH OTHER ENIGMAS, P1; Dummett Michael, 1973, FREGE PHILOS LANGUAG; EDGINGTON D, 1986, CRITICA, V18, P3; Edgington Dorothy, 1991, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V65, P185; EELLS E, 1994, PROBABILITY CONDITIO; ELLIS B, 1984, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V62, P50, DOI 10.1080/00048408412341251 ; ELLIS B, 1973, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V24, P125, DOI 10.1093/bjps/24.2.125 ; ELLIS B., 1979, RATIONAL BELIEF SYST; FINE K, 1975, MIND, V84, P451; FIRESTONE M, 1995, THESIS AUSTR NATIONA; Fowler H., 1965, DICT MODERN ENGLISH; Frege Gottlob, 1980, PHILOS MATH CORRESPO; FREGE G, 1960, BEGRIFFSSCHRIFT, P1; Frege Gottlob, 1979, POSTHUMOUS WRITINGS; Geach P., 1960, TRANSLATIONS PHILOS; Gibbard Allan, 1981, IFS, P211; Gleick J., 1987, CHAOS; Goodman N., 1947, J PHILOS, V44, P113; GOODMAN N., 1955, FACT FICTION FORECAS; Grandy R. E., 1986, PHILOS GROUNDS RATIO; Grice H. P., 1989, STUDIES WAY WORDS; HAJEK A, 1989, J PHILOS LOGIC, V18, P423; Harper W, 1981, IFS; HARPER WL, 1976, F PROBABILITY THEORY, V1; HINTIKKA J, 1966, ASPECTS INDUCTIVE LO; JACKSON F, 1979, PHILOS REV, V88, P565, DOI 10.2307/2184845 ; JACKSON F, 1977, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V55, P3, DOI 10.1080/00048407712341001 ; JACKSON F, 1990, ANALYSIS, V50, P134, DOI 10.2307/3328856 ; Jackson F., 1987, CONDITIONALS; Jackson F, 1991, CONDITIONALS; Jackson F. C., 1981, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V81, P125; JEFFREY R, 1991, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V65, P61; JEFFREY RC, 1964, J PHILOS, V61, P702; Kripke S, 1972, NAMING NECESSITY; Kripke S., 1963, ACTA PHILOS FENN, V16, P83; LANCE M, 1991, PHILOS REV, V100, P269, DOI 10.2307/2185303 ; Laplace Pierre-Simon, 1951, PHILOS ESSAY PROBABI; LEWIS D, 1976, PHILOS REV, V85, P297, DOI 10.2307/2184045 ; LEWIS D, 1979, NOUS, V13, P455, DOI 10.2307/2215339 ; LEWIS D, 1994, MIND, V103, P473, DOI 10.1093/mind/103.412.473 ; LEWIS D, 1986, PHILOS REV, V5, P581; Lewis D., 1980, STUDIES INDUCTIVE LO, V2, P263; Lewis D., 1986, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V59, P5; Lewis D., 1973, COUNTERFACTUALS; LEWIS D, 1981, IFS, V1, P267; Lewis D., 1973, J PHILOS, V70, P556, DOI DOI 10.2307/2025310; LEWIS D., 1986, PHILOS PAPERS, VII; LOWE EJ, 1990, ANALYSIS, V50, P80, DOI 10.2307/3328851 ; LOWE EJ, 1995, PHILOS Q, V43, P41; Mackie J. L., 1973, TRUTH PROBABILITY PA; MCGEE V, 1985, J PHILOS, V82, P462, DOI 10.2307/2026276 ; MCGEE V, 1989, PHILOS REV, V98, P485, DOI 10.2307/2185116 ; McGee Vann, 1994, PROBABILITY CONDITIO, P179; MELLOR DH, 1993, J PHILOS, V90, P233, DOI 10.2307/2940911 ; MENZIES P, 1989, PHILOS SCI, V56, P642, DOI 10.1086/289518 ; Pearl J., 1988, PROBABILISTIC REASON; PENDLEBURY M, 1989, MIND, V390, P179; Quine W., 1974, METHODS LOGIC; QUINE WVO, 1953, WAYS PARADOX, V62, P21; RAMSEY FP, 1931, F MATHEMATICS LOGICA; READ S, 1995, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V69; Russell B., 1919, INTRO MATH PHILOS; RUSSELL B, 1962, PRINCIPIA MATH 56; Ryle G., 1950, PHILOS ANAL; SANFORD D, 1989, P THEN Q CONDITIONAL; Skyrms Brian, 1994, PROBABILITY CONDITIO, P13; Skyrms B., 1981, IFS, P259; SMILEY T, 1984, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V84, P113; SMITH P, 1991, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V91, P247; STALNAKE.RC, 1970, PHILOS SCI, V37, P64, DOI 10.1086/288280 ; STALNAKER R, 1975, PHILOSOPHIA, V5, P269, DOI 10.1007/BF02379021 ; STALNAKER R, 1994, PROBABILITY CONDITIO, P31; Stalnaker R., 1981, IFS, P87; STALNAKER R, 1991, STUDIES LOGICAL THEO, V2, P98; Stalnaker Robert C., 1984, INQUIRY; Strawson P. F., 1986, PHILOS GROUNDS RATIO, P229; THOMSON J, 1990, J PHILOS, V87, P56; TICHY P, 1976, PHILOS STUD, V29, P271, DOI 10.1007/BF00411887 ; TRAVIS C, 1986, MEANING INTERPRETATI; van Fraassen B., 1976, FDN PROBABILITY THEO, P261; VANFRAASSEN BC, 1980, CAN J PHILOS, V10, P497; von Wright G. H., 1957, LOGICAL STUDIES; WOODS M, UNPUB CONDITIONALS; WRIGHT C, 1983, ANALYSIS, V43, P134, DOI 10.2307/3327431 ; WRIGHT C., 1992, TRUTH OBJECTIVITY","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/104.414.235",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","QX948","WOS:A1995QX94800001",,,,,"2018-01-02",1.0,"adamsew adamsew adamsew adamsew andersonalanross appiaha appiaha ayersmr bayest bennettj bennettj bennettj bennettj bernoullij blackmax blackburnsw burtondm carlstromif carnapr chisholmrm daleaj davidsond demingw dudmanvh dudmanvh dudmanvh dudmanvh dudmanvh dudmanvh dudmanvh dudmanvc dummettm dummettm dummettmichael edgingtond edgingtondorothy eellse ellisb ellisb ellisb finek firestonem fowlerh fregegottlob fregeg fregegottlob geachp gibbardallan gleickj goodmann goodmann grandyre gricehp hajeka harperw harperwl hintikkaj jacksonf jacksonf jacksonf jacksonf jacksonf jacksonfc jeffreyr jeffreyrc kripkes kripkes lancem laplacepierresimon lewisd lewisd lewisd lewisd lewisd lewisd lewisd lewisd lewisd lewisd loweej loweej mackiejl mcgeev mcgeev mcgeevann mellordh menziesp pearlj pendleburym quinew quinewvo ramseyfp reads russellb russellb ryleg sanfordd skyrmsbrian skyrmsb smileyt smithp stalnakerc stalnakerr stalnakerr stalnakerr stalnakerr stalnakerrobertc strawsonpf thomsonj tichyp travisc vanfraassenb vanfraassenbc vonwrightgh woodsm wrightc wrightc adamse","cluster_3"
-0.6327300711981185,-0.5513756788113362,17.0,268.0,268.0,2.0,5.0,1994.0,103.0,412.0,473.0,490.0,18.0,"J","LEWIS, D",,,,"LEWIS, D",,,"CHANCE AND CREDENCE - HUMEAN SUPERVENIENCE DEBUGGED","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"LEWIS, D (reprint author), PRINCETON UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,PRINCETON,NJ 08544, USA.",,,,,,"Armstrong David, 1983, WHAT IS LAW NATURE; Armstrong D., 1980, TIME CAUSE ESSAYS PR; BIGELOW J, 1993, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V44, P443, DOI 10.1093/bjps/44.3.443 ; Bigelow J., 1988, REALITY NUMBERS; Forrest P., 1988, QUANTUM METAPHYSICS; HALL N, 1994, MIND, V103, P505, DOI 10.1093/mind/103.412.505 ; HASLANGER S, IN PRESS AUSTRALASIA; Lewis David, 1980, STUDIES INDUCTIVE LO, V2, P83; Lewis D., 1973, COUNTERFACTUALS; LEWIS D., 1986, PHILOS PAPERS, VII; Mellor D. H., 1971, MATTER CHANCE; MENZIES P, 1989, PHILOS SCI, V56, P642, DOI 10.1086/289518 ; RAMSEY F.P., 1990, PHILOS PAPERS; ROBINSON D, 1989, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V67, P394, DOI 10.1080/00048408912343921 ; THAU M, 1994, MIND, V103, P491, DOI 10.1093/mind/103.412.491 ; TOOLEY M, 1987, CAUSATION REALIST AP; van Fraassen Bas, 1989, LAWS SYMMETRY","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/103.412.473",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","PM104","WOS:A1994PM10400005",,,,,"2018-01-02",2.0,"armstrongd bigelowj bigelowj forrestp halln haslangers lewisdavid lewisd lewisd mellordh menziesp ramseyfp robinsond thaum tooleym vanfraassenbas armstrongdavid","cluster_3"
-0.27860221180725825,0.06684238425388757,7.0,226.0,233.0,2.0,31.0,1989.0,98.0,391.0,349.0,366.0,18.0,"J","MCGINN, C",,,,"MCGINN, C",,,"CAN WE SOLVE THE MIND BODY PROBLEM","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"MCGINN, C (reprint author), UNIV OXFORD,OXFORD,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"BENACERRAF P, 1973, J PHILOS; Chomsky Noam, 1975, REFLECTIONS LANGUAGE; Fodor J., 1983, MODULARITY MIND; KRIPKE S., 1980, NAMING NECESSITY; Nagel Thomas, 1986, VIEW FROM NOWHERE; NAGEL T., 1979, MORTAL QUESTIONS; Strawson P. F., 1959, INDIVIDUALS","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","AJ942","WOS:A1989AJ94200002",,,,,"2018-01-02",3.0,"chomskynoam fodorj kripkes nagelthomas nagelt strawsonpf benacerrafp","cluster_0"
-0.7875018846625651,0.5224042981437376,42.0,205.0,205.0,2.0,7.0,2005.0,114.0,455.0,509.0,563.0,55.0,"J","Kolodny, N",,,,"Kolodny, N",,,"Why be rational?","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA","Kolodny, N (reprint author), Harvard Univ, 313 Emerson Hall, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA.","kolodny@fas.harvard.edu",,,,,"Arpaly N, 2000, ETHICS, V110, P488, DOI 10.1086/233321 ; BERMUDEZ J, 2003, REASON NATURE ESSAYS; Broome J, 1999, RATIO, V12, P398, DOI 10.1111/1467-9329.00101 ; Broome John, 2001, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V75, P175; Broome J., 2004, REASON VALUE THEMES, P28; BROOME J, 2003, REASONING; BROOME J, 2003, PRACTICAL REASONING, P85; BROOME J, UNPUB RATIONALITY; Burge T, 2003, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V67, P503, DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00307.x ; Carroll L., 1895, MIND, V4, P278, DOI [10.1093/mind/IV.14.278, DOI 10.1093/MIND/IV.14.278]; Dancy J., 2000, PRACTICAL REALITY; Davidson D, 2004, PROBLEMS RATIONALITY, P189; Foot Philippa, 2001, NATURAL GOODNESS; Harman G., 1986, CHANGE VIEW; HATZIMOYSIS A., 2003, PHILOS EMOTIONS; HURSTHOUSE R, 1995, VIRTUES REASONS; JONES K, 2003, EMOTION WEAKNESS WIL, P181; JONES K, WHAT SHOULD WE WANT; JONES K, UNPUB INTELLECTUAL S; Kamm F. M., 2000, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V74, P21; KAVKA GS, 1983, ANALYSIS, V43, P33, DOI 10.2307/3327802 ; Korsgaard C. M., 1996, SOURCES NORMATIVITY; Lavin D, 2004, ETHICS, V114, P424, DOI 10.1086/381695 ; PARFIT D, UNPUB REDISCOVERING; Parfit Derek, 1997, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V71, P99, DOI DOI 10.1111/1467-8349.00021; POLLOCK J., 1999, CONT THEORIES KNOWLE; Raz Joseph, 1999, ENGAGING REASON; SCANLON T., 1998, WHAT WE OWE EACH OTH; SCANLON TM, UNPUB STRUCTURAL IRR; Scanlon Thomas, 2003, P ADDRESSES AM PHILO, V77, P7, DOI DOI 10.2307/3219738; Searle J, 2001, RATIONALITY ACTION; Searle J. R., 1983, INTENTIONALITY; Shah N, 2003, PHILOS REV, V112, P447, DOI 10.1215/00318108-112-4-447 ; SHAH N, UNPUB NEW ARGUMENT E; SMITH M, 2004, PHILOSOPHY S, V55, P195; Smith M., 1994, MORAL PROBLEM; SVARVARSDOTTIR S, 2003, SO J PHILOS, V41, P121; THOMPSON M, 1995, REPRESENTATION LIFE, P247; Wallace R. J., 1999, ETHICAL THEORY MORAL, V2, P217, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1009946911117; WALLACE RJ, 2004, REASONS VALUE THEMES, P28; Williams B., 1981, MORAL LUCK, P101; Williams B, 1995, MAKING SENSE HUMANIT, P35","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzi223",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","952WY","WOS:000231037900002",,,,,"2018-01-02",4.0,"bermudezj broomej broomejohn broomej broomej broomej broomej burget carrolll dancyj davidsond footphilippa harmang hatzimoysisa hursthouser jonesk jonesk jonesk kammfm kavkags korsgaardcm lavind parfitd parfitderek pollockj razjoseph scanlont scanlontm scanlonthomas searlej searlejr shahn shahn smithm smithm svarvarsdottirs thompsonm wallacerj wallacerj williamsb williamsb arpalyn","cluster_6"
-0.04595986257147676,-0.05413865138450365,4.0,203.0,208.0,2.0,5.0,1958.0,67.0,266.0,166.0,173.0,8.0,"J","SEARLE, JR",,,,"SEARLE, JR",,,"PROPER NAMES","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"GEACH, TRANSLATIONS PHILOS, P56; QUINE WV, LOGICAL POINT VIEW, pCH2; STRWSON, 1950, MIND; Wittgenstein, PHILOS INVESTIGATION, P79","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","CCP44","WOS:A1958CCP4400002",,,,,"2018-01-02",5.0,"quinewv strwson wittgenstein geach","cluster_0"
-0.9400724782828843,-0.7121866003238406,82.0,184.0,188.0,2.0,76.0,1995.0,104.0,413.0,1.0,61.0,61.0,"J","CHOMSKY, N",,,,"CHOMSKY, N",,,"LANGUAGE AND NATURE","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"CHOMSKY, N (reprint author), MIT,DEPT LINGUIST & PHILOSOPHY,CAMBRIDGE,MA 02139, USA.",,"Galantucci, Bruno/E-5770-2010",,,,"Atlas J., 1989, PHILOS AMBIGUITY; Baker Lynne Rudder, 1988, CONTENTS THOUGHT, P1; Baldwin T., 1993, P BRIT ACAD, V80, P171; BILGRAMI A, 1992, BELIEF MEANING; BRADLEY D, 1994, SCIENCE, V264, P908, DOI 10.1126/science.8009198; BROCK WH, 1992, FONTANA NORTON HIST; Bromberger S., 1992, WHAT WE KNOW WE DONT; BURGE T, 1986, PHILOS REV, V95, P3, DOI 10.2307/2185131 ; BURGE T, 1992, PHILOS REV, V101, P3, DOI 10.2307/2185043 ; BURGE T, 1988, CONTENTS THOUGHT, P62; CHASTAIN C, 1988, CONTENTS THOUGHT, P18; CHOMSKY, 1993, LANGUAGE THOUGHT; Chomsky Noam, 1994, MIT OCCASIONAL PAPER, V5; CHOMSKY N, 1992, INFERENCE EXPLANATIO; Chomsky Noam, 1986, KNOWLEDGE LANGUAGE I; Chomsky Noam, 1980, RULES REPRESENTATION; CHOMSKY N, UNPUB IRISH J PHILOS; Chomsky N., 1957, SYNTACTIC STRUCTURES; CHOMSKY N, 1993, PHILOS TOPICS, V20, P205; CHOMSKY Noam, 1993, VIEW BUILDING, V20; Chomsky Noam, 1966, CARTESIAN LINGUISTIC; Chomsky Noam, 1975, REFLECTIONS LANGUAGE; CHOMSKY N, 1975, LOGICAL STRUCTURE LI; CHURCHLAND P, 1994, LONDON REV BOOK 0512, P13; Churchland P. M., 1994, P ADDRESSES AM PHILO, V67, P23; CLARK A, 1993, MIND LANGUAGE, P487; DAVIDSON D, 1990, THESIS U CALIFORNIA; Davidson D., 1986, TRUTH INTERPRETATION; DENNETT D, 1991, TLS-TIMES LIT SUPPL, V4597, P10; DEVITT M, 1989, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V3, P497; Dijksterhuis E. J., 1986, MECHANIZATION WORLD; DREBEN B, 1993, PHILOS TOPICS, V20, P293; Dummett M., 1993, SEAS LANGUAGE; Dummett Michael, 1991, LOGICAL BASIS METAPH; Dummett Michael, 1986, TRUTH INTERPRETATION, P459; EDELMAN G, 1992, BRIGHTT SUN BRILLIAN; EGAN F, THESIS RUTGERS U; Friedman Michael, 1993, WORLD CHANGES T KUHN; GAY P, 1977, ENLIGHTENMENT INTERP, V2; Gleitman Lelia, 1990, LANG ACQUIS, V1, P3, DOI DOI 10.1207/S15327817LA0101_2; Gould Stephen Jay, 1982, PANDAS THUMB; HAGOORT P, 1992, IN PRESS LANGUAGE CO; HAGOORT P, 1993, PERSPECTIVES SENTENC; HAUGELAND J, 1979, J PHILOS, V76, P619, DOI 10.2307/2025695 ; JACOB F, 1973, LOGIC LIFE; Jacob M. C., 1988, CULTURAL MEANING SCI; LABANDEIRA CC, 1993, SCIENCE, V261, P310, DOI 10.1126/science.11536548; Lepore Ernest, 1986, TRUTH INTERPRETATION; LEWONTIN R, 1994, THESIS HARVARD; Llinas R., 1987, MINDWAVES THOUGHTS I; MARCIA B, 1994, SCIENCE, V264, P775; Marr D., 1982, VISION; MARSHALL J, 1989, VENSTERS OP GEEST; McGinn Colin, 1993, PROBLEMS PHILOS; McGinn C., 1991, PROBLEM CONSCIOUSNES; Mehler J., 1994, WHAT INFANTS KNOW; MIDDLEBROOKS JC, 1994, SCIENCE, V264, P842, DOI 10.1126/science.8171339 ; Millikan R. G., 1984, LANGUAGE THOUGHT OTH; MORAVCSIK JM, 1975, DIALOGUE-CAN PHILOS, V14, P622, DOI 10.1017/S001221730002655X ; Moravscik J.M.E., 1990, THOUGHT LANGUAGE; Nagel T, 1993, NEW YORK REV BO 0304, P37; NEVILLE H, 1991, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V3, P151, DOI 10.1162/jocn.1991.3.2.151; PASSMORE JA, 1965, PRIESTLEYS WRITINGS; PUSTEJOVSKY J, 1993, SEMANTICS LEXICON; PUTNAM H, 1975, MINNESOTA STUDIES PH, V7; Putnam H., 1989, REPRESENTATION REALI; PUTNAM H, 1993, PHILOS TOPICS, V20, P347; QUINE WV, 1992, J PHILOS, V89, P5, DOI 10.2307/2026889 ; Romaine S., 1994, LANGUAGE SOC; SCHWEBER SS, 1993, PHYS TODAY, V46, P34, DOI 10.1063/1.881368 ; SEARLE J. R., 1992, REDISCOVERY MIND; SMITH B, 1992, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, P109; SMITH NV, 1993, LINGUA, V91, P279, DOI 10.1016/0024-3841(93)90002-E ; SOAMES S, 1989, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V3, P575; Stich S., 1983, FOLK PSYCHOL COGNITI; STRYKER MP, 1994, SCIENCE, V263, P1244, DOI 10.1126/science.8122106; Turing A. M., 1950, MIND, V59, P433, DOI [10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433, DOI 10.1093/MIND/LIX.236.433]; Ullman S., 1979, INTERPRETATION VISUA; WALDROP MM, 1990, SCIENCE, V247, P1543, DOI 10.1126/science.2321014; Wright C., 1989, REFLECTIONS CHOMSKY, P233; Yamada J., 1990, LAURA; Yolton John, 1983, THINKING MATTER","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/104.413.1",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","QH555","WOS:A1995QH55500001",,,,,"2018-01-02",6.0,"bakerlynnerudder baldwint bilgramia bradleyd brockwh brombergers burget burget burget chastainc chomsky chomskynoam chomskyn chomskynoam chomskynoam chomskyn chomskyn chomskyn chomskynoam chomskynoam chomskynoam chomskyn churchlandp churchlandpm clarka davidsond davidsond dennettd devittm dijksterhuisej drebenb dummettm dummettmichael dummettmichael edelmang eganf friedmanmichael gayp gleitmanlelia gouldstephenjay hagoortp hagoortp haugelandj jacobf jacobmc labandeiracc leporeernest lewontinr llinasr marciab marrd marshallj mcginncolin mcginnc mehlerj middlebrooksjc millikanrg moravcsikjm moravscikjme nagelt nevilleh passmoreja pustejovskyj putnamh putnamh putnamh quinewv romaines schweberss searlejr smithb smithnv soamess stichs strykermp turingam ullmans waldropmm wrightc yamadaj yoltonjohn atlasj","cluster_0"
-0.5713640075128769,0.33129919866383095,15.0,176.0,179.0,0.0,3.0,1987.0,96.0,381.0,36.0,61.0,26.0,"J","SMITH, M",,,,"SMITH, M",,,"THE HUMEAN THEORY OF MOTIVATION","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"SMITH, M (reprint author), PRINCETON UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,PRINCETON,NJ 08544, USA.",,,,,,"DAVIDSON D, 1980, ESSAYS ACTIONS EVENT; Hume David, 1739, TREATISE HUMAN NATUR; McDowell J., 1981, WITTGENSTEIN FOLLOW; MCDOWELL J, 1979, MONIST; MCDOWELL J, 1978, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S; Nagel T., 1970, POSSIBILITY ALTRUISM; Parfit D., 1984, REASONS PERSONS; PEACOCKE C, 1983, SENSE CONTENT, pCH8; Platts M., 1980, REFERENCE TRUTH REAL; Platts M., 1979, WAYS MEANING; SMITH M, 1986, FACT SCI MORALITY ES; Stocker Michael, 1979, J PHILOS; Stroud B., 1977, HUME; WILLIAMS B., 1981, MORAL LUCK; WOODS M, 1972, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","F9933","WOS:A1987F993300003",,,,,"2018-01-02",7.0,"humedavid mcdowellj mcdowellj mcdowellj nagelt parfitd peacockec plattsm plattsm smithm stockermichael stroudb williamsb woodsm davidsond","cluster_6"
-0.5502685002254031,-0.25547630610349953,18.0,159.0,159.0,0.0,2.0,1989.0,98.0,389.0,81.0,103.0,23.0,"J","BOGHOSSIAN, PA; VELLEMAN, JD",,,,"BOGHOSSIAN, PA; VELLEMAN, JD",,,"COLOR AS A SECONDARY QUALITY","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"BOGHOSSIAN, PA (reprint author), UNIV MICHIGAN,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,2205 ANGELL HALL,ANN ARBOR,MI 48109, USA.",,,,,,"ARMSTRONG DM, 1968, MATERIALIST THEORY M; BENNETT J, 1971, LOCKE BERKELEY HUME, pCH4; BURTT EA, 1954, METAPHYSICAL F MODER, P85; Evans G., 1980, PHILOS SUBJECTS ESSA, P76; HARDIN CL, 1988, COLOR PHILOS UNWEAVI, P28; Nidditch P. H., 1975, ENQUIRY PRINCIPLES M; Locke John, 1975, ESSAY HUMAN UNDERSTA; MCDOWELL, LINDLEY LECTURE; McDowell J., 1985, MORALITY OBJECTIVITY, P110; NEWTON I, 1979, OPTICKS 1; PEACOCKE C, 1983, SENSE CONTENT, pCH1; PEACOCKE C, 1984, SYNTHESE, P365; SHOEMAKER S, QUALITIES QUALIA WHA, P2; Smart J. J. C., 1975, PHILOS ASPECTS MIND; SMITH M, 1986, SYNTHESE, P559; Wiggins D., 1987, NEEDS VALUES TRUTH, P185; Wittgenstein L., 1974, PHILOS INVESTIGATION; 1942, OPERE COMPLETE GG, V4, P333","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","T2314","WOS:A1989T231400005",,,,,"2018-01-02",9.0,"bennettj burttea evansg hardincl nidditchph lockejohn mcdowell mcdowellj newtoni peacockec peacockec shoemakers smartjjc smithm wigginsd wittgensteinl armstrongdm","cluster_0"
-0.9215754514835675,-0.7462948295286452,34.0,154.0,154.0,1.0,4.0,1989.0,98.0,392.0,507.0,549.0,43.0,"J","BOGHOSSIAN, PA",,,,"BOGHOSSIAN, PA",,,"THE RULE-FOLLOWING CONSIDERATIONS .5.","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"BOGHOSSIAN, PA (reprint author), UNIV MICHIGAN,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,ANN ARBOR,MI 48109, USA.",,,,,,"AYER AJ, 1952, LANGUAGE TRUTH LOGIC, P89; BAKER G, 1984, SYNTHESE, P409; BLACKBURN, 1984, SPREADING WORD, P82; BLACKBURN S, 1984, SYNTHESE, P281; Block N, 1986, MIDWEST STUDIES PHIL, V10; BOGHOSSIAN PA, 1986, THESIS PRINCETON; BOGHOSSIAN PA, 1990, IN PRESS PHILOS REV; BOGHOSSIAN PA, 1989, PHILOS TOPICS SPR; BOGHOSSIAN PA, IN PRESS MEANING SCE; BURGE T, 1988, J PHILOS NOV; BURGE T, 1986, SUBJECT THOUGHT CONT, P125; Churchland Paul M, 1981, J PHILOS; Davidson, 1980, ESSAYS ACTIONS EVENT; DAVIDSON D, 1987, P APA JAN; Dretske F., 1981, KNOWLEDGE FLOW INFOR; FIELD H, 1977, J PHILOS; FODOR J, 1989, PHILOS TOPICS SPR; Fodor J., 1987, PSYCHOSEMANTICS; FODOR JA, MODULARITY MIND; GOLDFARB, 1985, J PHILOS; GRICE HP, 1957, PHILOS REV; Kripke Saul Aaron, 1982, WITTGENSTEIN RULES P; LEPORE E, 1987, J PHILOS; Mackie J., 1977, ETHICS INVENTING RIG; MCDOWELL J, 1984, SYNTHESE, P329; MCGINN C, 1984, WITTGENSTEIN MEANING, P144; Millikan Ruth G, 1987, LANGUAGE THOUGHT OTH; Papineau D., 1987, REALITY REPRESENTATI; PEACOCKE C, 1981, WITTGENSTEIN FOLLOWI; Schiffer S. R., 1972, MEANING; SELLARSIAN, 1963, SCI PERCEPTION REALI; Stampe D., 1977, MIDWEST STUDIES PHIL, V2; WRIGHT C, 1989, REFLECTIONS CHOMSKY, P255; 1972, INTENTIONALITY MIND","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","CA940","WOS:A1989CA94000002",,,,,"2018-01-02",10.0,"bakerg blackburn blackburns blockn boghossianpa boghossianpa boghossianpa boghossianpa burget burget churchlandpaulm davidson davidsond dretskef fieldh fodorj fodorj fodorja goldfarb gricehp kripkesaulaaron leporee mackiej mcdowellj mcginnc millikanruthg papineaud peacockec schiffersr sellarsian stamped wrightc ayeraj","cluster_0"
-0.8379625247491383,-0.6820213828712053,23.0,150.0,150.0,0.0,0.0,1990.0,99.0,395.0,327.0,354.0,28.0,"J","ROSEN, G",,,,"ROSEN, G",,,"MODAL FICTIONALISM","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"ROSEN, G (reprint author), UNIV MICHIGAN,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,ANN ARBOR,MI 48109, USA.",,,,,,"ARMSTRONG DM, 1986, CANADIAN J PHILOS; BLACKBURN S, 1984, SPREADING WORD, P212; CARNAP R, 1947, MEANING NECESSITY, P9; CHIHARA C, 1973, ONTOLOGY VICIOUS CIR, pCH2; Forbes Graeme, 1985, METAPHYSICS MODALITY; FORREST P, 1984, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, P164; HAZEL A, 1976, J PHILOS LOGIC, P25; HODES H, 1984, J PHILOS, P123; KALTON K, 1978, J PHILOS, P5; KRIPKE, 1980, NAMING NECESSITY, P19; KRIPKE S, 1975, J PHILOS, V72, P690, DOI 10.2307/2024634 ; Lewis D., 1983, PHILOS PAPERS, V1; LEWIS D, 1973, COUNTERFACTUALS, P86; Lewis D., 1986, PLURALITY WORLDS; LEWIS D, 1978, AM PHILOS Q, P37; Plantinga A., 1974, NATURE NECESSITY; POE, 1965, COMPLETE WORKS EA PO, V16, P256; ROUTLEY R, 1980, AUSTR NATIONAL U MON, V3, P176; Stalnaker Robert C., 1984, INQUIRY; UNGER P, 1984, MIDWEST STUDIES; VANFRAASSEN B, 1966, J PHILOS, P481; VANINWAGEN P, 1986, MW STUDIES PHILOS, P185; Wolterstorff N., 1980, WORKS WORLDS ART","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","DR991","WOS:A1990DR99100001",,,,,"2018-01-02",11.0,"blackburns carnapr chiharac forbesgraeme forrestp hazela hodesh kaltonk kripke kripkes lewisd lewisd lewisd lewisd plantingaa poe routleyr stalnakerrobertc ungerp vanfraassenb vaninwagenp wolterstorffn armstrongdm","cluster_3"
-0.953215207562365,-0.9238583439048836,42.0,136.0,136.0,1.0,3.0,1990.0,99.0,394.0,185.0,206.0,22.0,"J","CRANE, T; MELLOR, DH",,,,"CRANE, T; MELLOR, DH",,,"THERE IS NO QUESTION OF PHYSICALISM","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"UNIV CAMBRIDGE DARWIN COLL,CAMBRIDGE CB3 9EU,ENGLAND","CRANE, T (reprint author), UNIV LONDON KINGS COLL,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,STRAND,LONDON WC2R 2LS,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"Armstrong David, 1983, WHAT IS LAW NATURE; BURGE T, 1986, PHILOS REV; CARTWRIGHT N, 1983, HOW LAWS PHYSICS LIE, pCH3; CHOMSKY N, 1969, WORDS OBJECTIONS; CRANE TM, 1989, THESIS CAMBRIDGE U; DAVIDSON D, 1985, ESSAYS DAVIDSON ACTI, P246; Davidson Donald, 1970, ESSAYS ACTIONS EVENT; DAVIDSON D, 1980, ESSAYS ACTIONS EVENT; DENBIGH KG, 1955, PRINCIPLES CHEM EQUI, P76; EDDINGTON AS, 1929, NATURE PHYSICAL WORL, pR11; ENC B, 1982, MIND; FEIGL H, 1981, INQUIRIES PROVOCATIO, P315; FIELD H, 1980, SCI WITHOUT NUMBERS; FIELD HH, 1978, ERKENNTNIS, P78; Fodor J., 1987, PSYCHOSEMANTICS, P97; FODOR JA, 1974, SYNTHESE; Friedman M., 1981, REDUCTION TIME REALI; HELLMAN GP, 1905, J PHILOS; Hempel Carl Gustav, 1966, PHILOS NATURAL SCI; Johnson-Laird P., 1983, MENTAL MODELS; KIRK R, 1986, TRANSLATION DETERMIN; KRIPKE S, 1972, SEMANTICS NATURAL LA; LONGUETHIGGINS C, NATURE MIND, P16; LYCAN W, 1981, PHILOS TOPICS; MACKIE JL, 1975, CAUSATION CONDITIONA; Marr D., 1982, VISION; MCGINN C, 1983, SUBJECTIVE VIEW, pCH7; MCGINN C, 1978, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, P197; MCGINN C, 1980, SYNTHESE, P187; MELLOR DH, 1981, REAL TIME, pCH9; MELLOR DH, 1987, METAPHYSICS MORALITY; Mellor D.H., 1980, SCI BELIEF BEHAVIOUR; MELLOR DH, 1988, PROBABILITY CAUSALIT; Putnam H., 1975, MIND LANGUAGE REALIT; Quine W. V., 1960, WORD OBJECT; Quine Willard V. O., 1953, LOGICAL POINT VIEW; SCHLESINGER G, 1963, METHOD PHYSICAL SCI, pCH2; Shepard RN, 1982, MENTAL IMAGES THEIR; STICH S, 1983, FOLK PSYCHOL COGNITI, pCH7; STROUD B, 1987, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, P264; SUPPES P, 1985, ESSAYS DAVIDSON ACTI; WILSON M, 1985, PACIFIC PHILOS Q, P235","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","DA146","WOS:A1990DA14600002",,,,,"2018-01-02",12.0,"burget cartwrightn chomskyn cranetm davidsond davidsondonald davidsond denbighkg eddingtonas encb feiglh fieldh fieldhh fodorj fodorja friedmanm hellmangp hempelcarlgustav johnsonlairdp kirkr kripkes longuethigginsc lycanw mackiejl marrd mcginnc mcginnc mcginnc mellordh mellordh mellordh mellordh putnamh quinewv quinewillardvo schlesingerg shepardrn stichs stroudb suppesp wilsonm armstrongdavid","cluster_0"
-0.4200464580786904,-0.31303706719829416,13.0,135.0,136.0,0.0,2.0,2004.0,113.0,449.0,57.0,94.0,38.0,"J","Travis, C",,,,"Travis, C",,,"The silence of the senses","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"Northwestern Univ, Evanston, IL 60208 USA","Travis, C (reprint author), Northwestern Univ, Evanston, IL 60208 USA.","c-travis@northwestern.edu",,"Travis, Charles/0000-0003-2370-7685",,,"AUSTIN JL, 1962, SENSES SENSIBILIA; DAVIES M, 1992, P ARISTOLELIAN SOC, P92; DESCARTES R, 1971, DESCARTES PHILOS WRI; Harman G., 1990, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V4, P31, DOI DOI 10.2307/2214186; MCDOWELL J, 1998, J PHILOS, V95, P438; McDowell J., 1994, MIND WORLD; McGinn C., 1982, CHARACTER MIND; McGinn C., 1991, PROBLEM CONSCIOUSNES; Peacocke C., 1992, STUDY CONCEPTS; Searle J. R., 1983, INTENTIONALITY; TRAVIS C, 1997, PRAGMATICS; Tye Michael, 1995, 10 PROBLEMS CONSCIOU; Wright C., 1997, COMPANION PHILOS LAN","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/113.449.57",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","769QF","WOS:000188660700003",,,,,"2018-01-02",13.0,"daviesm descartesr harmang mcdowellj mcdowellj mcginnc mcginnc peacockec searlejr travisc tyemichael wrightc austinjl","cluster_0"
-0.763897945610933,-0.661290649865208,78.0,131.0,135.0,0.0,7.0,2002.0,111.0,443.0,583.0,632.0,50.0,"J","Wilson, D; Sperber, D",,,,"Wilson, D; Sperber, D",,,"Truthfulness and relevance","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"SELECTION TASK; PRAGMATICS; STANLEY; CONTEXT; SZABO; IRONY; SAID; MIND; FORM","This paper questions the widespread view that verbal communication is governed by a maxim, norm or convention of truthfulness which applies at the level of what is literally meant, or what is said. Pragmatic frameworks based on this view must explain the frequent occurrence and acceptability of loose and figurative uses of language. We argue against existing explanations of these phenomena and provide an alternative account, based on the assumption that verbal communication si governed not by expectations of truthfulness but by expectations of relevance, raised by literal, loose and figurative uses alike. Sample analyses are provided, and some consequences of this alternative account are explored. In particular, we argue that the notions of 'literal meaning' and 'what is said' play no useful theoretical role in the study of language use, and that the nature of explicit communication will have to be rethought.","UCL, London WC1E 6BT, England; CNRS EHESS Inst J Nicol, F-75007 Paris, France","Wilson, D (reprint author), UCL, London WC1E 6BT, England.","deirdre@ling.ucl.ac.uk; dan@sperber.com",,"Wilson, Deirdre/0000-0001-5570-9920",,,"Bach K, 2000, MIND LANG, V15, P262, DOI 10.1111/1468-0017.00131 ; Bach K., 1997, LINGUISTISCHE BERICH, V8, P33; Bach K., 1994, MIND LANG, V9, P124, DOI [10.1111/j.1468-0017.1994.tb00220.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1468-0017.1994.TB00220.X]; Bezuidenhout A, 1997, MIND, V106, P375, DOI 10.1093/mind/106.423.375 ; Carruthers P., 1998, LANGUAGE THOUGHT INT; CARRUTHERS P, 2000, EVOLUTION HUMAN MIND; Carston R., 1988, MENTAL REPRESENTATIO, P155; Carston R., 1998, RELEVANCE THEORY APP; Carston R., 2000, UCL WORKING PAPERS L, V12, P1; CARSTON R, IN PRESS THOUGHTS UT; Carston R., 1998, THESIS U COLL LONDON; Cole Peter, 1981, RADICAL PRAGMATICS; Cole P., 1975, SYNTAX SEMANTICS, V3; Davis S, 1991, PRAGMATICS READER; DAVIS S, IN PRESS SEMANTICS R; Gibbs RW, 1997, COGNITION, V62, P51, DOI 10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00724-X ; Girotto V, 2001, COGNITION, V81, pB69, DOI 10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00124-X; GREEOFSEMA M, 1995, LINGUA, V96, P139; Grice H. P., 1989, STUDIES WAY WORDS; GROSS S, 1998, THESIS HARVARD U; GUNDERSON K, 1975, MINNESOTA STUDIES PH; HAPPE FGE, 1993, COGNITION, V48, P101, DOI 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90026-R ; Hardman D., 1998, THINK REASONING, V4, P353, DOI 10.1080/135467898394111; HORN L, IN PRESS HDB PRAGMAT; IFANTIDOU Elly, 2001, EVIDENTIALS RELEVANC; JORGENSEN J, 1984, J EXP PSYCHOL GEN, V113, P112, DOI 10.1037//0096-3445.113.1.112; Katz Jerrold J., 1990, METAPHYSICS MEANING; Keefe Rosanna, 1997, VAGUENESS READER; KEMPSON R, 1988, MENTAL RPERESENTATIO; KHALFA J, 1994, WHAT IS INTELLIGENCE; LEVELT WJM, 1989, SPEAKING INTENTION A; LEWIS D, 1970, SYNTHESE, V22; LEWIS D, 1979, J PHILOS LOGIC, V8; Lewis D. K., 1983, PHILOS PAPERS; Lyons John, 1977, SEMANTICS; Matsui T., 2000, BRIDGING RELEVANCE; MATSUI T, 1998, PRAGMATICS COGNITION, V6, P47; Millikan R. G., 1984, LANGUAGE THOUGHT OTH; Neale S, 2000, MIND LANG, V15, P284, DOI 10.1111/1468-0017.00132 ; NEALE S, 1992, LINGUIST PHILOS, V15, P509, DOI 10.1007/BF00630629 ; Nicolle S, 1999, COGNITION, V69, P337; NOVECK I, 2001, METAPHOR SYMBOL, V16, P109, DOI DOI 10.1207/S15327868MS1601&; Origgi G, 2000, EVOLUTION HUMAN MIND, P140; Politzer G, 1996, J PSYCHOLINGUIST RES, V25, P543, DOI 10.1007/BF01758182 ; RECANATI F, IN PRESS LIINGUISICS; Recanati Francois, 1989, MIND LANG, V4, P295, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-0017.1989.TB00258.X; Searle J., 1979, EXPRESSION MEANING; SPERBER D, 1995, COGNITION, V57, P31, DOI 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00666-M; SPERBER D, 1987, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V10, P736, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X00055618 ; Sperber D, 2002, MIND LANG, V17, P3, DOI 10.1111/1468-0017.00186 ; SPERBER D., 1990, ENDS RHETORIC HIST T, P140; Sperber Dan, 1998, RELEVANCE THEORY APP, P283, DOI DOI 10.1075/PBNS.37.16SPE; Sperber D, 1985, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V86, P153; Sperber D., 1994, WHAT IS INTELLIGENCE, P179; Sperber Dan, 1986, RELEVANCE COMMUNICAT; Sperber Dan, 2000, METAREPRESENTATIONS; SPERBER DAN-DEIRDRE, 1981, RADICAL PRAGMATICS, P295; Stainton Robert, 1997, PRAGMAT COGN, V5, P51; Stainton RJ, 1998, LINGUIST PHILOS, V21, P311, DOI 10.1023/A:1005386608967 ; Stanley J, 2000, MIND LANG, V15, P219, DOI 10.1111/1468-0017.00130 ; Stanley J, 2000, LINGUIST PHILOS, V23, P391, DOI 10.1023/A:1005599312747 ; STICH S, 1990, FRAGMENTATION REASON; TAYLOR K, IN PRESS SYNTHESE; TRAVIS C, 1985, CAN J PHILOS, V15, P187; TURNER K, 1999, SEMANTICS-PRAGMATICS; UNGER P., 1975, IGNORANCE CASE SCEPT; van der Henst JB, 1999, BRIT J PSYCHOL, V90, P73; VANDERHENST JB, IN PRESS MIND LANGUA; Van der Henst J.-B., 2002, THINK REASONING, V8, P1; WELLBERY D, 1990, ENDS RHETORIC HIST T; WERTH P, 1981, CONVERSATION DISCOUR; Williamson T., 1994, VAGUENESS; WILSON D, 1993, LINGUA, V90, P1, DOI 10.1016/0024-3841(93)90058-5 ; WILSON D, 1992, LINGUA, V87, P53, DOI 10.1016/0024-3841(92)90025-E ; Wilson D., 2000, METAREPRESENTATIONS, P411; Wilson D., 1998, RELEVANCE THEORY APP, P1; Wilson Deirdre, 1981, CONVERSATION DISCOUR, P155; WILSON D, IN PRESS HDB PRAGMAT","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/111.443.583",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","575MK","WOS:000176949900003",,,,,"2018-01-02",14.0,"bachk bachk bezuidenhouta carruthersp carruthersp carstonr carstonr carstonr carstonr carstonr colepeter colep daviss daviss gibbsrw girottov greeofsemam gricehp grosss gundersonk happefge hardmand hornl ifantidouelly jorgensenj katzjerroldj keeferosanna kempsonr khalfaj leveltwjm lewisd lewisd lewisdk lyonsjohn matsuit matsuit millikanrg neales neales nicolles novecki origgig politzerg recanatif recanatifrancois searlej sperberd sperberd sperberd sperberd sperberdan sperberd sperberd sperberdan sperberdan sperberdandeirdre staintonrobert staintonrj stanleyj stanleyj stichs taylork travisc turnerk ungerp vanderhenstjb vanderhenstjb vanderhenstjb wellberyd werthp williamsont wilsond wilsond wilsond wilsond wilsondeirdre wilsond bachk","cluster_3"
-0.48084024104001116,-0.4643268501583254,15.0,131.0,133.0,0.0,1.0,1994.0,103.0,411.0,249.0,285.0,37.0,"J","FIELD, H",,,,"FIELD, H",,,"DEFLATIONIST VIEWS OF MEANING AND CONTENT","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"TRUTH",,,"FIELD, H (reprint author), CITY UNIV NEW YORK,GRADUATE CTR,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,NEW YORK,NY 10024, USA.",,,,,,"Benacerraf P., 1973, J PHILOS, V70, P661; Crossley J. N, 1977, REPORTS MATH LOGIC, VVIII, P11; FIELD H, 1992, PHILOS SCI, V59, P321, DOI 10.1086/289671 ; Field H., 1986, FACT SCI MORALITY, P55; FIELD H, 1994, PHILOS REV, V103; Horwich P., 1990, TRUTH; KRIPKE S., 1980, NAMING NECESSITY; Lewis David, 1975, MINNESOTA STUDIES PH, V7, P3; MACDONALD G, 1986, FACT SCI VALUE; Putnam H., 1983, PHILOS PAPERS, V3; Quine Willard Van Orman, 1960, WORD OBJECT; Quine Willard V. O., 1953, LOGICAL POINT VIEW; SOAMES S, 1984, J PHILOS, V81, P411, DOI 10.2307/2026307 ; Stalnaker Robert C., 1984, INQUIRY; WRIGHT C., 1992, TRUTH OBJECTIVITY","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/103.411.249",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","NY276","WOS:A1994NY27600001",,,,,"2018-01-02",15.0,"crossleyjn fieldh fieldh fieldh horwichp kripkes lewisdavid macdonaldg putnamh quinewillardvanorman quinewillardvo soamess stalnakerrobertc wrightc benacerrafp","cluster_0"
-0.8524136510960484,-0.6210883285995532,43.0,114.0,114.0,0.0,3.0,2007.0,116.0,464.0,983.0,1026.0,44.0,"J","Yalcin, S",,,,"Yalcin, Seth",,,"Epistemic modals","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"CONDITIONALS","Epistemic modal operators give rise to something very like, but also very unlike, Moore's paradox. I set out the puzzling phenomena, explain why a standard relational semantics for these operators cannot handle them, and recommend an alternative semantics. A pragmatics appropriate to the semantics is developed and interactions between the semantics, the pragmatics, and the definition of consequence are investigated. The semantics is then extended to probability operators. Some problems and prospects for probabilistic representations of content and context are explored.","[Yalcin, Seth] MIT, Dept Linguist & Philosophy, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA","Yalcin, S (reprint author), MIT, Dept Linguist & Philosophy, 77 Massachusetts Ave,32-D940, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.","yalcin@mit.edu",,,,,"Adams E., 1975, LOGIC CONDITIONALS; Almog J., 1989, THEMES KAPLAN; ANDERSON A, 1987, NATURE, V330, P686, DOI 10.1038/330686b0 ; BEAVER D, 2002, CONSTRUCTION MEANING; Beaver D., 2001, PRESUPPOSITION ASSER; DEROSE K, 1991, PHILOS REV, V100, P581, DOI 10.2307/2185175 ; Dummett Michael, 1973, FREGE PHILOS LANGUAG; EELLS E, 1994, PROBABILITY CONDITIO; EGAN A, IN PRESS EPISTEMIC M; Egan A, 2007, PHILOS STUD, V133, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11098-006-9003.x; EIKMEYER HJ, 1981, WORDS WORLDS CONTEXT; ENGEL P, 2000, BELIEVING ACCEPTING; FARLEY AP, 1986, PAR PRAGM GRAMM THEO; GIBBARD A, 1990, WISE CHOICES APT FEE; Grunwald PD, 2003, J ARTIF INTELL RES, V19, P243; HACKING I, 1967, PHILOS REV, V76, P143, DOI 10.2307/2183640 ; Hajek A, 2003, SYNTHESE, V137, P273, DOI 10.1023/B:SYNT.0000004904.91112.16 ; Halpern J.Y., 2003, REASONING UNCERTAINT; HAMBLIN CL, 1959, MIND, V68, P234; Hintikka J., 1962, KNOWLEDGE BELIEF INT; KANGER S, 1980, PHILOS GRAMMAR; Kratzer A., 1977, LINGUIST PHILOS, V1, P337, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00353453; LEWIS D, 1979, J PHILOS LOGIC, V8, P339; LEWIS D, 1976, PHILOS REV, V85, P297, DOI 10.2307/2184045 ; LEWIS D, 1988, THEORIA, V54, P161; LEWIS D, 1979, PHILOS REV, V88, P513, DOI 10.2307/2184843 ; Lewis D., 1973, COUNTERFACTUALS; LUKASIEWICZ J, 1970, SELECTED WORK; LUKASIEWICZ J, 1930, CR HEBD ACAD SCI, V23, P153; MACFARLANE J, 2006, UNPUB EPISTEMIC MODA; MELLOR DH, 2005, PROBABILITY PHILOS I; Preyer Gerhard, 2005, CONTEXTUALISM PHILOS; PUIGWALDMULLER E, 2007, P SINN BED BARC U PO, V11; RESCHER N, 1968, STUDIES LOGICAL THEO; STALNAKER R, 1975, PHILOSOPHIA, V5, P269, DOI 10.1007/BF02379021 ; Stalnaker R., 1970, SYNTHESE, V22, P272, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00413603; SWANSON E, 2006, THESIS MIT; UNGER P., 1975, IGNORANCE CASE SCEPT; VELTMAN F, 1996, J PHILOS LOGIC, V25, P221; VONSTECHOW A, 1991, SEMANTICS INT HDB CO; Williamson T., 2000, KNOWLEDGE ITS LIMITS; YALCIN S, UNPUB PROBABILITY OP; YALCIN S, IN PRESS NONFACTUALI","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423","1460-2113",,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzm983",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","239VB","WOS:000251545300007",,,,,"2018-01-02",16.0,"almogj andersona beaverd beaverd derosek dummettmichael eellse egana egana eikmeyerhj engelp farleyap gibbarda grunwaldpd hackingi hajeka halpernjy hamblincl hintikkaj kangers kratzera lewisd lewisd lewisd lewisd lewisd lukasiewiczj lukasiewiczj macfarlanej mellordh preyergerhard puigwaldmullere reschern stalnakerr stalnakerr swansone ungerp veltmanf vonstechowa williamsont yalcins yalcins adamse","cluster_3"
-0.18618057735253202,-0.14880623717823613,7.0,110.0,111.0,0.0,0.0,1995.0,104.0,414.0,393.0,411.0,19.0,"J","FRICKER, E",,,,"FRICKER, E",,,"TESTIMONY - A PHILOSOPHICAL STUDY - COADY,CAJ","MIND",,,"English","Book Review",,,,,,,,,,"FRICKER, E (reprint author), UNIV OXFORD MAGDALEN COLL,OXFORD OX1 4AU,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"Coady C. J. A., 1992, TESTIMONY PHILOS STU; DAVIDSON D., 1984, INQUIRIES TRUTH INTE; Fricker Elizabeth, 1987, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V61, P57; FRICKER E, 1986, KNOWLEDGE LANGUAGE; Locke John, 1961, ESSAY HUMAN UNDERSTA; Wittgenstein L., 1977, CERTAINTY; 1994, KNOWING WORDS, P125","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/104.414.393",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","QX948","WOS:A1995QX94800005",,,,,"2018-01-02",17.0,"davidsond frickerelizabeth frickere lockejohn wittgensteinl coadycja","cluster_0"
-0.17615767875026442,-0.18432307934884742,32.0,108.0,108.0,0.0,0.0,1993.0,102.0,406.0,263.0,283.0,21.0,"J","DRETSKE, F",,,,"DRETSKE, F",,,"CONSCIOUS EXPERIENCE","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"DRETSKE, F (reprint author), STANFORD UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,STANFORD,CA 94305, USA.",,,,,,"Armstrong D. M., 1980, NATURE MIND OTHER ES; ARMSTRONG DM, 1968, MATERIALIST THEORY M; Astington J., 1988, DEV THEORIES MIND; Baars B. J., 1988, COGNITIVE THEORY CON; Dennett Daniel, 1991, CONSCIOUSNESS EXPLAI; DRETSKE F, 1979, BODY MIND METHOD ESS; Dretske F., 1969, SEEING KNOWING; Dretske F., 1981, KNOWLEDGE FLOW INFOR; DRETSKE F, 1978, MINNESOTA STUDIES PH, P107; DRETSKE F, 1990, INVITATION COGNITIVE, V2; FLAVELL JH, 1988, DEV THEORIES MIND; Gibson E. J., 1969, PRINCIPLES PERCEPTUA; GRICE P., 1989, STUDIES WAY WORDS; GUSTAFSON DF, 1979, BODY MIND METHOD ESS; Humphrey N., 1992, HIST MIND EVOLUTION; LEESRB, 1963, GRAMMAR ENGLISH NOMI; LYCAN WG, 1992, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V15, P216, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X00068370 ; Lycan W. G., 1987, CONSCIOUSNESS; MCLAUGHLIN B, 1991, CRITICAL ESSAYS PHIL; MILNER AD, 1992, NEUROPSYCHOLOGY CONS; OSHERSON DN, 1990, INVITATION COGNITIVE, V2; Perkins M, 1983, SENSING WORLD; Rock I., 1983, LOGIC PERCEPTION; ROSENTHAL D, 1990, ZIF40 U BIEL RES GRO; Rosenthal D., 1986, PHILOS STUD, V94, P329; ROSENTHAL DM, 1991, CONSCIOUSNESS, P15; Savage Wade C., 1978, MINNESOTA STUDIES PH, VIX; STROMEYER CF, 1970, NATURE, V225, P346, DOI 10.1038/225346a0 ; VELMANS M, 1991, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V14, P651, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X00071776 ; VILLANUEVA E, 1991, CONSCIOUSNESS; Wellman H., 1990, CHILDS THEORY MIND; White A., 1964, ATTENTION","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/102.406.263",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","LB007","WOS:A1993LB00700004",,,,,"2018-01-02",18.0,"armstrongdm astingtonj baarsbj dennettdaniel dretskef dretskef dretskef dretskef dretskef flavelljh gibsonej gricep gustafsondf humphreyn leesrb lycanwg lycanwg mclaughlinb milnerad oshersondn perkinsm rocki rosenthald rosenthald rosenthaldm savagewadec stromeyercf velmansm villanuevae wellmanh whitea armstrongdm","cluster_0"
-0.05828756794921206,-0.034150672160944105,14.0,106.0,106.0,0.0,5.0,2005.0,114.0,454.0,223.0,238.0,16.0,"J","Baker, A",,,,"Baker, A",,,"Are there genuine mathematical explanations of physical phenomena?","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"PERIODICAL CICADAS; INDISPENSABILITY ARGUMENT","Many explanations in science make use of mathematics. But are there cases where the mathematical component of a scientific explanation is explanatory in its own right? This issue of mathematical explanations in science has been for the most part neglected. I argue that there are genuine mathematical explanations in science, and present in some detail an example of such an explanation, taken from evolutionary biology, involving periodical cicadas. I also indicate how the answer to my title question impacts on broader issues in the philosophy of mathematics; in particular it may help platonists respond to a recent challenge by Joseph Melia concerning the force of the Indispensability Argument.","Swarthmore Coll, Dept Philosophy, Swarthmore, PA 19081 USA","Baker, A (reprint author), Swarthmore Coll, Dept Philosophy, Swarthmore, PA 19081 USA.","abaker1@swarthmore.edu",,,,,"Baker A, 2003, PHILOS QUART, V53, P49, DOI 10.1111/1467-9213.00295 ; Balaguer M., 1998, PLATONISM ANTIPLATON; Colyvan M., 2001, INDISPENSABILITY MAT; COLYVAN M, 2002, MIND, V3, P69; COX RT, 1988, AM MIDL NAT, V120, P183, DOI 10.2307/2425898; Cox RT, 1998, AM NAT, V152, P162, DOI 10.1086/286158; Field H., 1989, REALISM MATH MODALIT; GOLES E, 2001, COMPLEXITY, P33; Landau E., 1958, ELEMENTARY NUMBER TH; MADDY P, 1992, J PHILOS, V89, P275, DOI 10.2307/2026712 ; Melia J, 2000, MIND, V109, P455, DOI 10.1093/mind/109.435.455 ; MELIA J, 2002, MIND, V3, P75; SCHROEDER M, 1992, P S APPL MATH PROV R, V46; Yoshimura J, 1997, AM NAT, V149, P112, DOI 10.1086/285981","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzi223",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","923RH","WOS:000228926500001",,,,,"2018-01-02",19.0,"balaguerm colyvanm colyvanm coxrt coxrt fieldh golese landaue maddyp meliaj meliaj schroederm yoshimuraj bakera","cluster_0"
-0.3334854110706519,-0.2639933749423404,1.0,103.0,103.0,0.0,0.0,1975.0,84.0,335.0,451.0,458.0,8.0,"J","FINE, K",,,,"FINE, K",,,"COUNTERFACTUALS - LEWIS,D","MIND",,,"English","Book Review",,,,,,,,,"UNIV TORONTO,TORONTO,ONTARIO,CANADA",,,,,,,"Lewis D., 1973, COUNTERFACTUALS","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","AJ175","WOS:A1975AJ17500013",,,,,"2018-01-02",20.0,"lewisd","cluster_3"
-0.667733375954263,-0.3565903274228033,16.0,98.0,100.0,0.0,0.0,1992.0,101.0,401.0,89.0,105.0,17.0,"J","JOHNSTON, M",,,,"JOHNSTON, M",,,"CONSTITUTION IS NOT IDENTITY","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"JOHNSTON, M (reprint author), PRINCETON UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,1879 HALL,PRINCETON,NJ 08544, USA.",,,,,,"ADAMS RM, 1979, J PHILOS, V76, P5, DOI 10.2307/2025812 ; GIBBARD A, 1976, J PHILOS LOGIC, V4, P187; Gupta A., 1980, LOGIC COMMON NOUNS; Johnston M., 1987, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V61, P107; KAPLAN D, 1976, J PHILOS, V72, P716; LEONARD HS, 1940, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V5, P46; Lewis D., 1971, J PHILOS, V68, P203, DOI DOI 10.2307/2024902; Lewis D., 1986, PLURALITY WORLDS; LEWIS DK, 1968, J PHILOS, V65, P113, DOI 10.2307/2024555 ; ROBINSON D, 1982, PHILOS REV, V81, P317; ROBINSON DJ, 1982, THESIS MONASH U; THOMSON JJ, 1983, J PHILOS, V80, P201, DOI 10.2307/2026004 ; UNGER P, 1990, PERSONS CONSCIOUSNES; UNGER P, 1981, MIDWEST STUDIES PHIL, V6; WILLIAMS DC, 1986, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V64, P1, DOI 10.1080/00048408612342191 ; WILLIAMS D. C., 1966, PRINCIPLES EMPIRICAL","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/101.401.89",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","HA983","WOS:A1992HA98300006",,,,,"2018-01-02",21.0,"gibbarda guptaa johnstonm kapland leonardhs lewisd lewisd lewisdk robinsond robinsondj thomsonjj ungerp ungerp williamsdc williamsdc adamsrm","cluster_3"
-1.1488186804808187,-0.7627850589303935,59.0,95.0,96.0,0.0,6.0,2003.0,112.0,446.0,195.0,234.0,40.0,"J","Fine, K",,,,"Fine, K",,,"The non-identity of a material thing and its matter","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"CONTINGENT IDENTITY; CONSTITUTION; SUPERVENIENCE; COINCIDENCE; OBJECTS; ACCOUNT; WORLDS; PLACE; PARTS","There is a well-known argument from Leibniz's Law for the view that coincident material things may be distinct. For given that they differ in their properties, then how can they be the same? However, many philosophers have suggested that this apparent difference in properties is the product of a linguistic illusion; there is just one thing out there, but different sorts or guises under which it may be described. I attempt to show that this 'opacity' defence has intolerable consequences for the functioning of our language and that the original argument should therefore be allowed to stand.","NYU, Dept Philosophy, New York, NY USA","Fine, K (reprint author), NYU, Dept Philosophy, New York, NY USA.",,,,,,"Baker LR, 1997, J PHILOS, V94, P599, DOI 10.2307/2564596 ; BURKE MB, 1992, ANALYSIS, V52, P12, DOI 10.2307/3328875 ; BURKE MB, 1980, MIND, V89, P391; BURKE MB, 1994, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V54, P591, DOI 10.2307/2108583 ; Carnap R., 1974, MEANING NECESSITY; DOEPKE F, 1982, RATIO, V42, P45; Fine K, 2000, MONIST, V83, P357, DOI 10.5840/monist200083315 ; Fine K., 1999, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, VXXIII, P61, DOI DOI 10.1111/1475-4975.00004; Fine K., 1982, LANGUAGE ONTOLOGY, P97; Fine Kit, 1990, PROPOSITIONAL ATTITU, P1; Fine Kit, 1989, THEMES KAPLAN, P197; Gallois A., 1998, OCCASIONS IDENTITY S; Geach Peter Thomas, 1980, REFERENCE GENERALITY; GIBBARD A, 1975, J PHILOS LOGIC, V4, P187, DOI 10.1007/BF00693273 ; Griffin N., 1977, RELATIVE IDENTITY; Gupta A., 1980, LOGIC COMMON NOUNS; HELLER M, 1984, PHILOS STUD, V46, P323, DOI 10.1007/BF00372910 ; HELLER M, 1992, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V52, P695, DOI 10.2307/2108216 ; HELLER M, 1990, ONTOLOGY PHYSICAL OB; HORGAN T, 1993, PHILOS PHENOMENOLOGI, V53, P593; JOHNSTON M, 1992, MIND, V101, P89, DOI 10.1093/mind/101.401.89 ; JUBIEN M, 1996, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V10, P343; Kaplan D., 1986, PHILOS WV QUINE; Kaplan D, 1969, WORDS OBJECTIONS ESS, P178; LAYCOCK H, 1972, PHILOS REV, V81, P3, DOI 10.2307/2184224 ; Levey S, 1997, ANALYSIS, V57, P1, DOI 10.1111/1467-8284.00044 ; LEWIS D, 1988, ANALYSIS, V48, P65, DOI 10.2307/3328771 ; Lewis David, 1976, IDENTITIES PERSONS; LEWIS D, 1971, J PHILOS, V68, P230; Lewis David, 1993, ONTOLOGY CAUSALITY M; Lewis D., 1986, PLURALITY WORLDS; LEWIS D, 1993, PAPERS METAPHYSICS E; MYRO G, 1986, PHILOS GROUNDS RATIO; NOONAN HW, 1991, PHILOS QUART, V41, P183, DOI 10.2307/2219592 ; Oderberg DS, 1996, PHILOS REV, V105, P145, DOI 10.2307/2185716 ; Quine W. V., 1969, ONTOLOGICAL RELATIVI; Quine W.V., 1961, LOGICAL POINT VIEW; Rea Michael, 1997, MATERIAL CONSTITUTIO; Rea MC, 1997, AM PHILOS QUART, V34, P367; Rea MC, 2000, PHILOS STUD, V97, P169, DOI 10.1023/A:1018311406047 ; REA MC, 1998, RATIO, V9, P316; ROBINSON D, 1985, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V63, P299, DOI 10.1080/00048408512341901 ; ROBINSON D, 1982, PHILOS REV, V91, P317, DOI 10.2307/2184688 ; ROBINSON DJ, 1982, THESIS MONASH U; Saul JM, 1997, ANALYSIS, V57, P102, DOI 10.1111/1467-8284.00060 ; Sider T, 1999, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V59, P913, DOI 10.2307/2653562 ; SIDER T, 1996, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V74, P433, DOI 10.1080/00048409612347421 ; Sider Theodore, 2000, PHILOS BOOKS, V41, P81; Sider T., 2001, 4 DIMENSIONALISM; Simons P., 1987, PARTS STUDY ONTOLOGY; Sosa Ernest, 1999, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, VXXIII, P132; Sosa E., 1987, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V1; THOMSON JJ, 1998, NOUS, V32, P194; UNGER P, 1979, SYNTHESE, V41, P117, DOI 10.1007/BF00869568 ; VANINWAGEN P, 1981, PAC PHILOS QUART, V62, P123; van Inwagen Peter, 1990, MATERIAL BEINGS; WIGGINS D, 1968, PHILOS REV, V77, P90, DOI 10.2307/2183184 ; Wiggins D., 1980, SAMENESS SUBSTANCE; ZIMMERMAN DW, 1995, PHILOS REV, V104, P53, DOI 10.2307/2186012","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/112.446.195",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","669NH","WOS:000182357000001",,,,,"2018-01-02",22.0,"burkemb burkemb burkemb carnapr doepkef finek finek finek finekit finekit galloisa geachpeterthomas gibbarda griffinn guptaa hellerm hellerm hellerm horgant johnstonm jubienm kapland kapland laycockh leveys lewisd lewisdavid lewisd lewisdavid lewisd lewisd myrog noonanhw oderbergds quinewv quinewv reamichael reamc reamc reamc robinsond robinsond robinsondj sauljm sidert sidert sidertheodore sidert simonsp sosaernest sosae thomsonjj ungerp vaninwagenp vaninwagenpeter wigginsd wigginsd zimmermandw bakerlr","cluster_3"
-0.23446301415201576,-0.2487764933297809,29.0,95.0,97.0,0.0,2.0,1986.0,95.0,378.0,149.0,179.0,31.0,"J","FINE, A",,,,"FINE, A",,,"UNNATURAL ATTITUDES - REALIST AND INSTRUMENTALIST ATTACHMENTS TO SCIENCE","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"FINE, A (reprint author), NORTHWESTERN UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,EVANSTON,IL 60201, USA.",,,,,,"Blackburn S., 1980, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V5, P353; Blackburn S, 1984, SPREADING WORD; Boyd R, 1985, IMAGES SCI, P3; Boyd R., 1984, SCI REALISM, P41; CARTWRIGHT N, 1983, HOW LAWS PHYSICS LIE; CHURCHLAND PM, 1985, IMAGES SCI; Devitt M., 1984, REALISM TRUTH; Ellis B., 1985, IMAGES SCI, P48; ELLIS B., 1979, RATIONAL BELIEF SYST; FINE A, 1984, NOUS, V18, P51, DOI 10.2307/2215021 ; Fine A., 1986, SHAKY GAME EINSTEIN; Fine A., 1984, SCI REALISM, P83; FRIEDMAN M, 1983, F SPACE TIME THEORIE; GIERE RN, 1985, PHILOS SCI, V52, P331, DOI 10.1086/289255 ; Hacking I., 1983, REPRESENTING INTERVE; HULL DL, 1980, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V11, P311, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.001523 ; Kuhn T, 1970, STRUCTURE SCI REVOLU; Laudan L., 1984, SCI REALISM, P218; Leplin J., 1984, SCI REALISM; MCMICHAEL A, 1985, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V36, P257, DOI 10.1093/bjps/36.3.257 ; McMullin Ernan, 1984, SCI REALISM, P8; Putnam H., 1981, REASON TRUTH HIST; Rorty R., 1982, CONSEQUENCES PRAGMAT; RORTY R, 1986, W RIEHE THEMEN PHILO, V1; Rorty Richard, 1986, PHILOS D DAVIDSON PE; SPEZIALI P, 1972, A EINSTEIN M BESSO C; van Fraassen Bas, 1985, IMAGES SCI ESSAYS RE, P245; Van Fraassen B.C., 1980, SCI IMAGE; WILLIAMS M, UNPUB PHILOS TOPICS","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","C1663","WOS:A1986C166300001",,,,,"2018-01-02",23.0,"blackburns boydr boydr cartwrightn churchlandpm devittm ellisb ellisb finea finea finea friedmanm gierern hackingi hulldl kuhnt laudanl leplinj mcmichaela mcmullinernan putnamh rortyr rortyr rortyrichard spezialip vanfraassenbas vanfraassenbc williamsm blackburns","cluster_0"
-0.5925945119791798,0.27493042972161147,21.0,94.0,94.0,0.0,1.0,1992.0,101.0,403.0,461.0,481.0,21.0,"J","VELLEMAN, JD",,,,"VELLEMAN, JD",,,"WHAT HAPPENS WHEN SOMEONE ACTS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"VELLEMAN, JD (reprint author), UNIV MICHIGAN,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,2205 ANGEL HALL,ANN ARBOR,MI 48109, USA.",,,,,,"ANDERSON E, UNPUB SOURCES NORMS; Bishop John, 1989, NATURAL AGENCY ESSAY; Broad CD, 1952, ETHICS HIST PHILOS; Chisholm Roderick, 1976, PERSON OBJECT METAPH; CHISHOLM RM, 1978, PHILOSOPHIA, V7, P597, DOI 10.1007/BF02378837 ; CHRISTMAN J, 1991, CAN J PHILOS, V21, P1; DAVIDSON D, 1980, ESSAYS ACTIONS EVENT; Dent N. J. H., 1984, MORAL PSYCHOL VIRTUE; Frankfurt H.G., 1988, IMPORTANCE WHAT WE C; Ginet C., 1990, ACTION; Goldman A., 1970, THEORY HUMAN ACTION; HARMAN G, 1976, REV METAPHYS, V29, P431; Nagel T., 1986, VIEW NOWHERE; Peacocke C., 1979, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V4, P123; Taylor R., 1966, ACTION AND PURPOSE; VELLEMAN JD, 1992, NOUS, V26, P3, DOI 10.2307/2215684 ; VELLEMAN JD, 1990, PACIFIC PHILOS Q, V70, P73; Velleman JD, 1989, PRACTICAL REFLECTION; WATSON G, 1982, FREE WILL, P205; Williams B., 1981, MORAL LUCK, P101; Wolf Susan, 1990, FREEDOM REASON","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/101.403.461",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","JG315","WOS:A1992JG31500003",,,,,"2018-01-02",24.0,"bishopjohn broadcd chisholmroderick chisholmrm christmanj davidsond dentnjh frankfurthg ginetc goldmana harmang nagelt peacockec taylorr vellemanjd vellemanjd vellemanjd watsong williamsb wolfsusan andersone","cluster_6"
-0.17777640478854623,-0.14732322522938268,3.0,94.0,97.0,0.0,0.0,1991.0,100.0,397.0,19.0,34.0,16.0,"J","FODOR, JA",,,,"FODOR, JA",,,"YOU CAN FOOL SOME OF THE PEOPLE ALL OF THE TIME, EVERYTHING ELSE BEING EQUAL, HEDGED LAWS AND PSYCHOLOGICAL EXPLANATIONS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"CUNY GRAD SCH & UNIV CTR,NEW YORK,NY 10036","FODOR, JA (reprint author), RUTGERS STATE UNIV,NEW BRUNSWICK,NJ 08903, USA.",,,,,,"DAVIDSON D, 1980, ESSAYS ACTIONS EVENT; HEMPEL C, 1988, LIMITATIONS DEDUCTIO; SCHIFFER S, MIND, V100, P1","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","EW928","WOS:A1991EW92800002",,,,,"2018-01-02",25.0,"hempelc schiffers davidsond","cluster_0"
-1.0505131000359005,0.20693724795689936,81.0,94.0,95.0,2.0,9.0,1987.0,96.0,382.0,145.0,172.0,28.0,"J","WATSON, G",,,,"WATSON, G",,,"FREE ACTION AND FREE WILL","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"WATSON, G (reprint author), UNIV CALIF IRVINE,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,IRVINE,CA 92717, USA.",,,,,,"ALBRITTON R, 1985, NOV P AM PHIL ASS; ANSCOMBE GEM, 1981, METAPHYSICS PHILOSOP, V3; Aristotle, NICOMACHEAN ETHICS; AUNE B, 1982, FREE WILL; AYER A., 1982, FREE WILL; BONJOUR L, 1976, SO J PHILOS; BRAMHALL B, 1962, FREE WILL; Brand Myles, 1976, ACTION THEORY; BRATMAN M, 1986, MIDWEST STUDIES PHIL, V10; BRATMAN ME, 1985, ESSAYS DAVIDSON ACTI; BROAD CD, 1962, FREE WILL; Chisholm Roderick, 1982, FREE WILL; Chisholm Roderick, 1976, ACTION THEORY; DAVIDSON D, 1980, ESSAYS ACTIONS EVENT; Dennett D., 1984, ELBOW ROOM; DWORKIN G, 1970, NOUS; DWORKIN G, 1976, HASTINGS CTR REPORT; FINE G, 1981, PHILOS REV; FISCHER J, 1982, J PHILOS; FISCHER J, 1983, PHILOS STUDIES; FISCHER J, 1986, PHILOS Q; FOLEY R, 1979, ANALYSIS; Frankfurt Harry, 1971, J PHILOS; Frankfurt H., 1973, ESSAYS FREEDOM ACTIO; Frankfurt H., 1976, IDENTITIES PERSONS; Frankfurt H, 1975, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S; FRANKFURT H, 1978, AM PHILOS Q; FRANKFURT H, 1969, J PHILOS; GERT B, 1979, NOUS; GINET C, 1980, TIME CAUSE; Ginet Carl, 1966, FREEDOM DETERMINISM; GINET C, 1983, PHILOS STUDIES; Glover Jonathan, 1970, RESPONSIBILITY; GOLDMAN A, 1978, PHILOSOPHIA; Goldman A., 1970, THEORY HUMAN ACTION; GREENSPAN PS, 1978, PHILOS REV; Hampshire S., 1965, FREEDOM INDIVIDUAL; HAMPSHIRE S., 1983, MORALITY CONFLICT; Hampshire S., 1959, THOUGHT ACTION; HOBBES T, 1969, BRIT MORALISTS 1650, V1; HOLSTROM N, 1977, PERSONALIST; Honderich T., 1973, ESSAYS FREEDOM ACTIO; Hornsby Jennifer, 1980, ACTIONS; Kane R., 1985, FREE WILL AND VALUES; Kant Immanuel, CRITIQUE PRACTICAL R; KENNY A, 1976, FREEDOM WILL POWER; KOLNAI A, 1966, ROYAL I PHILOS LECTU, V1; LAMB J, 1977, PHILOS REV; Lehrer Keith, 1966, FREEDOM DETERMINISM; LEHRER K, 1980, TIME CAUSE; LEHRER K, 1982, FREE WILL; LEWIS D, 1981, THEORIA; Locke John, ESSAY HUMAN UNDERSTA; Melden A. I., 1961, FREE ACTION; Morgenbesser S., 1962, FREE WILL; Nagel T., 1986, VIEW NOWHERE; NEELY W, 1974, PHILOS REV; OSHAUGHNESSY B, 1980, WILL, V2; OSHAUGHNESSY B, 1980, WILL, V1; PIPER A, 1985, PHILOS STUDIES; REID T, INQUIRY HUMAN MIND E; SHATZ D, 1986, MIDWEST STUDIES PHIL, V10; SLOTE M, 1982, J PHILOS; SLOTE M, 1980, J PHILOS; SORABJI R, 1983, NECESSITY CAUSE BLAM; Taylor Charles, 1985, HUMAN AGENCY LANGUAG, V1; TAYLOR R, 1960, ACTION PURPOSE; THALBERG I, 1976, ACTION THEORY; THALBERG I, 1978, CANADIAN J PHILOS; VANINWAGEN P, 1978, PHILOSOPHIA; Van Inwagen Peter, 1978, PHILOS REV; VANINWAGEN P, 1982, FREE WILL; van Inwagen P, 1983, ESSAY FREE WILL; van Inwagen Peter, 1980, TIME CAUSE; WARNOCK G, 1963, FREEDOM WILL; Watson G., 1982, FREE WILL; WATSON G, 1977, PHILOS REV; Wiggins D, 1973, ESSAYS FREEDOM ACTIO; WILLIAMS B, 1985, LINDLEY LECTURE; ZIMMERMAN D, 1981, PACIFIC PHILOS Q; Zimmerman M., 1984, ESSAY HUMAN ACTION","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","H2320","WOS:A1987H232000002",,,,,"2018-01-02",26.0,"anscombegem aristotle auneb ayera bonjourl bramhallb brandmyles bratmanm bratmanme broadcd chisholmroderick chisholmroderick davidsond dennettd dworking dworking fineg fischerj fischerj fischerj foleyr frankfurtharry frankfurth frankfurth frankfurth frankfurth frankfurth gertb ginetc ginetcarl ginetc gloverjonathan goldmana goldmana greenspanps hampshires hampshires hampshires hobbest holstromn hondericht hornsbyjennifer kaner kantimmanuel kennya kolnaia lambj lehrerkeith lehrerk lehrerk lewisd lockejohn meldenai morgenbessers nagelt neelyw oshaughnessyb oshaughnessyb pipera reidt shatzd slotem slotem sorabjir taylorcharles taylorr thalbergi thalbergi vaninwagenp vaninwagenpeter vaninwagenp vaninwagenp vaninwagenpeter warnockg watsong watsong wigginsd williamsb zimmermand zimmermanm albrittonr","cluster_6"
-0.6017780948315953,0.05673750372018358,23.0,87.0,90.0,0.0,0.0,1992.0,101.0,401.0,1.0,15.0,15.0,"J","BRATMAN, ME",,,,"BRATMAN, ME",,,"PRACTICAL REASONING AND ACCEPTANCE IN A CONTEXT","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"BRATMAN, ME (reprint author), STANFORD UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,STANFORD,CA 94305, USA.",,,,,,"Bratman M, 1987, INTENTION PLANS PRAC; BRATMAN ME, 1991, ETHICS, V102, P117, DOI 10.1086/293374 ; BRATMAN ME, 1990, INTENTIONS COMMUNICA, P15; COHEN LJ, 1989, MIND, V98, P367; Davidson D., 1980, ESSAYS ACTIONS EVENT, P83; GRICE HP, 1974, 1974 U N CAR C; Grice H. Paul, 1971, P BRIT ACAD, V57, P263; Harman G., 1986, CHANGE VIEW; HARSANYI JC, 1985, THEOR DECIS, V18, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF00134075 ; HEIL J, IN PRESS NOUS; Levi I., 1980, ENTERPRISE KNOWLEDGE; Maher P., 1986, ERKENNTNIS, V24, P363; PERRY J, 1979, NOUS, V13, P3, DOI 10.2307/2214792 ; Price H. H., 1954, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V28, P1; RAZ J, 1975, MIND, V84, P481; Stalnaker R., 1974, SEMANTICS PHILOS, P197, DOI DOI 10.1093/0198237073.003.0003; Stalnaker Robert C., 1984, INQUIRY; THOMASON RH, 1986, REASONING ACTIONS PL, P341; ULLMANNMARGALIT E, 1983, J PHILOS, V80, P143, DOI 10.2307/2026132 ; Van Fraassen B.C., 1980, SCI IMAGE; Velleman JD, 1989, PRACTICAL REFLECTION; WEIRICH P, 1983, PHILOS STUD, V44, P175, DOI 10.1007/BF00354098 ; Williams B., 1973, PROBLEMS SELF, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511621253","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/101.401.1",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","HA983","WOS:A1992HA98300001",,,,,"2018-01-02",27.0,"bratmanme bratmanme cohenlj davidsond gricehp gricehpaul harmang harsanyijc heilj levii maherp perryj pricehh razj stalnakerr stalnakerrobertc thomasonrh ullmannmargalite vanfraassenbc vellemanjd weirichp williamsb bratmanm","cluster_6"
-0.47160978863377123,-0.17999209087195253,18.0,87.0,87.0,0.0,1.0,1977.0,86.0,342.0,159.0,185.0,27.0,"J","MCDOWELL, J",,,,"MCDOWELL, J",,,"SENSE AND REFERENCE OF A PROPER NAME","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"UNIV COLL OXFORD,OXFORD,ENGLAND",,,,,,,"DAVIDSON, 1973, TRUTH SYNTAX MODALIT, P84; DAVIDSON, 1967, SYNTHESE, V17, P310; Davidson D., 1973, DIALECTICA, V27, P313, DOI [10.1111/j.1746-8361.1973.tb00623.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1746-8361.1973.TB00623.X]; DUMMETT, 1976, TRUTH MEANING, P70; DUMMETT M, 1973, FREGE PHILOSOPHY LAN, P93; DUMMETT M, 1975, MIND LANGUAGE, P122; EVANS G, 1976, TRUTH MEANING ESSAYS, pR15; EVANS G, 1973, ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V47, P197; Field H., 1972, J PHILOS, V69, P347; FREGE, 1953, F ARITHMETIC, P73; FURTH M, 1967, BASIC LAWS ARITHMETR, P89; GEACH P, 1952, TRANSLATIONS PHILOSO; Graves C., 1973, J PHILOS, VLXX, P318; KRIPKE SA, 1972, SEMANTICS NATURAL LA, P280; NAGEL T, 1969, J PHILOS, V66, P452, DOI 10.2307/2024130 ; QUINE W, 1960, WORD OBJECT, P141; STICH SP, 1971, PHILOS REV, V80, P476, DOI 10.2307/2183754 ; WITTGENSTEIN, 1953, PHILOSOPHICAL INVEST, P217","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","DB482","WOS:A1977DB48200001",,,,,"2018-01-02",28.0,"davidson davidsond dummett dummettm dummettm evansg evansg fieldh frege furthm geachp gravesc kripkesa nagelt quinew stichsp wittgenstein davidson","cluster_0"
0.015548618043977445,0.01552757656990026,6.0,87.0,89.0,4.0,6.0,1958.0,67.0,265.0,100.0,103.0,4.0,"J","ANDERSON, AR",,,,"ANDERSON, AR",,,"A REDUCTION OF DEONTIC LOGIC TO ALETHIC MODAL LOGIC","MIND",,,"English","Discussion",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"ANDERSON AR, 1957, AM SOCIOL REV, V22, P9, DOI 10.2307/2088759 ; ANDERSON AR, 1956, 2 OFF NAV RES GROUP; Bohnert H. G., 1945, PHILOS SCI, V12, P302; PARRY WT, 1939, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V4, P137; Von Wright G. H., 1951, MIND, V60, P1, DOI DOI 10.1093/MIND/LX.237.1; 1957, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V22","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","CGZ96","WOS:A1958CGZ9600010",,,,,"2018-01-02",29.0,"andersonar bohnerthg parrywt vonwrightgh andersonar","cluster_0"
4.888129304297476E-4,0.03054130433797353,1.0,85.0,86.0,3.0,11.0,1967.0,76.0,301.0,62.0,72.0,11.0,"J","NARVESON, J",,,,"NARVESON, J",,,"UTILITARIANISM AND NEW GENERATIONS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"UNIV NEW HAMPSHIRE,DURHAM,NH",,,,,,,"SMART JJC, 1961, OUTLINE SYSTEM UTILI, P18","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","ZA894","WOS:A1967ZA89400005",,,,,"2018-01-02",30.0,"smartjjc","cluster_0"
-0.8241700296341751,-0.5879277694917936,16.0,84.0,84.0,1.0,5.0,1988.0,97.0,387.0,381.0,400.0,20.0,"J","JACKSON, F; PETTIT, P",,,,"JACKSON, F; PETTIT, P",,,"FUNCTIONALISM AND BROAD CONTENT","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"JACKSON, F (reprint author), AUSTRALIAN NATL UNIV,RES SCH SOCIAL SCI,CANBERRA,ACT 2601,AUSTRALIA.",,,,,,"Wettstein H., 1979, MIDWEST STUDIES PHIL, V4; DENNETT D, 1982, THOUGHT OBJECT; DEVITT M, 1987, LANGUAGE REALITY, P166; Dretske Fred, 1986, BELIEF; Evans Gareth, 1982, VARIETIES REFERENCE; Fodor Jerry, 1986, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V60, P235; JACKSON F, IN PRESS PHILOS TOPI; LEWIS D., 1986, PHILOS PAPERS, VII; McDowell J., 1986, SUBJECT THOUGHT CONT; MCGINN C, 1982, THOUGHT OBJECT; Nozick Robert, 1981, PHILOS EXPLANATIONS, P178; Owens J., 1987, PHILOS REV, P521; PERRY J, 1977, PHILOS REV, V86, P474, DOI 10.2307/2184564 ; Pettit Phillip, 1986, SUBJECT THOUGHT CONT; Putnam H., 1975, MIND LANGUAGE REALIT, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CB09780511625251, 10.1017/CBO9780511625251]; SMART, 1959, PHILOS REV, P141","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","P5492","WOS:A1988P549200004",,,,,"2018-01-02",31.0,"dennettd devittm dretskefred evansgareth fodorjerry jacksonf lewisd mcdowellj mcginnc nozickrobert owensj perryj pettitphillip putnamh smart wettsteinh","cluster_3"
-0.059650637082655535,0.35123899018619636,10.0,83.0,84.0,0.0,0.0,1984.0,93.0,370.0,194.0,214.0,21.0,"J","RAZ, J",,,,"RAZ, J",,,"ON THE NATURE OF RIGHTS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"RAZ, J (reprint author), UNIV OXFORD BALLIOL COLL,OXFORD,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"Brandt Richard B., 1959, ETHICAL THEORY; CAMPBELL K, 1979, THESIS OXFORD; Dworkin R., 1977, TAKING RIGHTS SERIOU; LYONS D, 1982, NOMOS, V24; MacCormick D. N., 1977, LAW MORALITY SOC; RAZ J, 1982, HARVARD LAW REV, V95, P916, DOI 10.2307/1340782 ; Raz J., 1975, PRACTICAL REASON NOR; RAZ J, LAW MORALITY SOC; RAZ J, RIGHTS UTILITY; Scanlon Thomas, 1979, U PITTSBURGH LAW REV, P519","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","SM398","WOS:A1984SM39800003",,,,,"2018-01-02",32.0,"campbellk dworkinr lyonsd maccormickdn razj razj razj razj scanlonthomas brandtrichardb","cluster_4"
0.22416484757830446,-0.7227383203067668,151.0,82.0,83.0,2.0,9.0,2002.0,111.0,444.0,751.0,815.0,65.0,"J","Caston, V",,,,"Caston, V",,,"Aristotle on consciousness (Perception, experience)","MIND",,,"English","Review",,,,,,,"QUALIA; MIND","Aristotle's discussion of perceiving that we perceive (On the Soul 3.2) has points of contact with two contemporary debates about consciousness: the first over whether consciousness is an intrinsic feature of mental states or a higher-order thought or perception; the second concerning the qualitative nature of experience. In both cases, Aristotle's views cut down the middle of an apparent dichotomy, in a way that does justice to each set of intuitions, while avoiding their attendant difficulties. With regard to the first issue--the primary focus of this paper--he argues that consciousness is both intrinsic and higher-order, due to its reflexive nature. This, in turn, has consequences for the second issue, where again Aristotle seeks out the middle ground. He is committed against qualia in any strong sense of the term. Yet he also holds that the phenomenal quality of experience is not exhausted by its representational content.",,,,,,,,"AQUILA RE, 1988, J HIST IDEAS, V49, P99954; Hett W. S., 1936, ANIMA; ARMSTRONG DM, 1984, CONSCIOUSNESS CAUSLA; ARMSTRONG DM, 1968, MATERIALIST THEORY M; ARNAULD A, 1683, VRAIES FAUSSES IDEES; BAEUMKER C, 1877, THESIS U MUSNTER; Bell David, 1990, HUSSERL; Bernard W., 1988, REZEPTIVITAT SPONTAN; BERNARD W, 1987, PHILOPONUS REJECTION; BLOCK I., 1961, AM J PHILOLOGY, V82, P50; BLOCK N, 1995, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V18, P227, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X00038188 ; Block N., 1996, PHILOS ISSUES, P19; BLUMENTHAL HJ, 1996, ARISTOTLE NEOPLATONI; Bonitz H., 1870, INDEX ARISTOTELICUS; BRADISH NC, 1929, MONIST, V30, P581; BRAUN E, 1956, ANN UNIV SARAVIENSIS, V5, P194; BREHIER E, 1942, REV PHILOS FRANCE ET, V133, P143; BRENTANO F, 1867, PSYCHOL ARISTOTELES; Brentano Franz, 1874, PSYCHOL EMPIRISCHEN; BRUGE T, 1988, J PHILOS, V58, P649; Burnyeat Myles, 1992, ESSAYS ARISTOTLES AN, P15; Burnyeat MF, 2002, PHRONESIS, V47, P28, DOI 10.1163/156852802760075693 ; Burnyeat M., 2001, ANCIENT MEDIEVAL THE, V76, P129; BYWATER I, 1892, CONTRIBUTIONS TEXTUA; CANCRINI A, 1970, SYNEIDESIS TEMA SEMA; Caston V, 1998, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V58, P249, DOI 10.2307/2653509 ; Cramer Konrad, 1974, STUTTGARTER HEGEL TA, P537; DAVIDSON D, 1980, ESSAYS HONOR CG HEMP; Davies C.G, 1990, CONSCIENCE CONSCIOUS; Dennett Daniel C., 1986, CONTENT CONSCIOUSNES; DRETSKE F, 1993, MIND, V102, P263, DOI 10.1093/mind/102.406.263 ; DRETSKE F, 1994, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V94, P263; Dretske F, 1997, NATURALIZING MIND; EUCKEN R., 1868, SPRACHGEBRAUCH ARIST; Everson S., 1997, ARISTOTLE PERCEPTION; Findlay J. N., 1933, MEINONGS THEORY OBJE; FRANCESCOTTI RM, 1995, PHILOS PSYCHOL, V8, P239, DOI 10.1080/09515089508573156 ; GADAMER HG, 1966, SUBJEKTIVITAT METAPH, P128; GENNARO BJ, 1995, CONSCIOUSNESS SELF-C; Gibson J., 1917, LOCKES THEORY KNOWLE; Goldman AJ, 1997, CONSCIOUS COGN, P111; GROSSMANN R, 1948, PHENOMENOLOGY EXISTE; Grossmann Reinhardt, 1965, STRUCTURE MIND; Hamlyn D. W., 1978, PAIDEIA, P8; HAMLYN DW, 1968, MONIST, V52, P195, DOI 10.5840/monist196852238 ; Hamlyn D.W, 1968, ARISTOTLE ANIMA; HARDIE WFR, 1976, MIND, V85, P388; Harman G, 1989, FDN COGNITIVE SCI, P831; HARMAN G, 1996, PERCEPTION, P1; Harman G., 1997, NATURE CONSCIOUSNESS, P663; Harrison John, 1965, LIB J LOCKE; Harvey E. Ruth, 1975, INWARD WITS PSYCHOL; Henrich D., 1970, HERMENEUTIK DIALEKTI, P257; HENRICH D, 1967, SUBJEKTIVITAT METPAH; HERBART JF, 1825, PSYCHOL WISSENSCH NE; HICKS RD, 1997, ARISTOTLE DE ANIMA; HORN HJ, 1994, STUDIEN DRITTEN BUCH; Husserl E., 1984, LOGISCHE UNTERSUCHUN; Husserl Edmund, 1966, PHANOMENOLOGIE INNER, VX; JOHANSEN TK, 1998, ARISTOTLE SENSE-ORGA; Jung G, 1933, ARCH GESAMTE PSYCHOL, V89, P525; KAHN CH, 1979, ARCH GESCH PHILOS, V48, P43; KANT I, DU SENS INTERNE; KEMP S, 1993, AM J PSYCHOL, V106, P559, DOI 10.2307/1422969 ; KEMP S, 1996, COGNITIVE PSYCHOL MI; KIM JW, 1993, ACTION THEORY, P159; KLUBERTANZ GP, 1952, DISCURSIVE POWER SOR; KOSMAN LA, 1975, PHILOS REV, V84, P499, DOI 10.2307/2183851 ; Krook D., 1993, J SERGEANT HIS CIRCL; Lautner P., 1994, B I CLASSICAL STUDIE, V39, P107; LEWIS CS, STUDIES WORDS; LEWIS FA, 1982, PHILOS STUD, V42, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF00372837 ; LEWIS FA, 1996, TOPOI-INT REV PHILOS, V15, P39, DOI 10.1007/BF00141305 ; LEWIS F. A., 1991, SUBSTANCE PREDICATIO; LEWIS G, 1950, PROBLEME INCONSCIENT; LYCAN WG, 1997, AI CONNECTIONISM PHI, P1; Lycan William G., 1996, CONSCIOUSNESS EXPERI; Lycan W. G., 1987, CONSCIOUSNESS; Lyons W., 1986, DISAPPEARANCE INTROS; Malcolm N., 1984, CONSCIOUSNESS CAUSAL, P1; MAYER C, 1994, AUGUSTINUS-LEXIKON, V1, P1218; MICHAEL E, 1989, J HIST PHILOS, V27, P29; MICHAEL E, 1988, HIST EUR IDEA, V9, P583, DOI 10.1016/0191-6599(88)90004-6 ; Milner A., 1995, VISUAL BRAIN ACTION; MODRAK D, 1981, ANCIENT PHILOS, V1, P160; MODRAK D. K., 1987, ARISTOTLE POWER PERC; Mohr Georg, 1991, SINNLICHE ICH INNERE; MONDOLFO R, 1964, MOMENTI PENSIERO GRE; Moore George Edward, 1903, MIND, V12, P433, DOI DOI 10.1093/MIND/XII.4.433; Nadler S. M., 1989, ARNAULD CARTESIAN PH; NEUHAEUSER J, 1878, ARISTOTELES LEHRE SI; Nussbaum Martha, 1995, ESSAYS ARISTOTLES; ODALY G, 1987, AUGUSTINES PHILOS MI; OEHLER K, 1974, P AM PHILOS SOC, V118, P493; Oehler Klaus, 1997, SUBJEKTIVITAT SELBST; Oehler K., 1962, LEHRE NOETISCHEN DIA; OSBORNE C, 1983, CLASSICAL QUART, V33, P401, DOI 10.1017/S0009838800034662 ; Peacocke C., 1983, SENSE CONTENT EXPERI; Pines S., 1954, ARCH HIST DOCTRINALE, V29, P21; Pothast U., 1971, EINIGE FRAGEN SELBST; Rabb J. Douglas, 1985, J LOCKE REFLECTION P; Rahman F., 1952, AVICENNAS PSYCHOL; Rodier G., 1900, ARISTOTE TRAITE AME; Rorty R, 1979, PHILOS MIRROR NATURE; ROSENTHAL DM, 1986, PHILOS STUD, V49, P329, DOI 10.1007/BF00355521 ; ROSENTHAL DM, 1993, CONSCIOUS COGN, V2, P355, DOI 10.1006/ccog.1993.1029 ; ROSENTHAL DM, IN PRESS PHILOS MIDN; ROSENTHAL DM, 1991, CONSCIOUSNESS, P15; Rosenthal David, 1997, NATURE CONSCIOUSNESS, P729; ROSS WD, 1961, ARISTOTLE ANIMA; Russell Bertrand, 1913, THEORY KNOWLEDGE; Ryle G., 1949, CONCEPT MIND; Sartre J.-P., 1936, TRANSCENDANCE EGO ES; Sartre Jean-Paul, 1948, B SOC FRANCAISE PHIL, V42, P49; Sartre Jean- Paul, 1943, ETRE NEANT; SCHEERER E, 1995, HIST WORTERBUCH PHIL, V9, P824; SCHELL JH, 1873, EINHEIT SEELENLEBENS; SCHMITZ H, 1964, SYSTEM PHILOS; SCHUHL PM, 1948, REV PHILOS FRANCE ET, V138, P191; SCHWYZER HR, 1957, SOURCES PLOTIN, P341; Sedley D., 1989, CRITERION TRUTH ESSA, P123; SHOEMAKER S, 1990, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V50, P109, DOI 10.2307/2108035 ; SHOEMAKER S, 1991, MIND, V100, P507; SHOREY P., 1901, AM J PHILOLOGY, V22, P149; SIEBECK H, 1882, Z PHILOS PHILOS KRIT, V80, P312; SMITH DW, 1986, TOPOI-INT REV PHILOS, V5, P149, DOI 10.1007/BF00139228 ; Smith David Woodruff, 1989, CIRCLE ACQUAINTANCE; Sorabji R, 1974, Philosophy, V49, P63; SORABJI Richard, 2001, ANCIENT MEDIEVAL THE, P49; Sorabji R., 1992, ESSAYS ARISTOTLES DE, P195; STERNECK NH, 1974, ISIS, V65, P193; Strohmaier Gotthard, 1988, OPERE PSICHOLOGICE G, P231; Stubenberg Leopold, 1998, CONSCIOUSNESS QUALIA; STUMPF C, 1919, F BRENTANO KENNTNIS; THEISS P, 1997, WAHRNEHMUNGSPSYCHOL; Thiel U, 1997, ARCH GESCH PHILOS, V79, P58, DOI 10.1515/agph.1997.79.1.58 ; Thiel U., 1991, USES ANTIQUITY, P79; Thiel U., 1994, BRIT J HIST PHILOS, V2, P75; THIEL U, 1983, LOCKES THEORIES PERS; THIEL U, 1969, J HIST PHILOS, V34, P213; TORSTRIK A, 1862, ARISTOTELIS ANIMA; Tsouna V, 1998, EPISTEMOLOGY CYRENAI; TUGENDHAT E, 1979, SELBSTBEWUSSTSEINS E; WARDY R, 1990, CHAIN CHANGE STUDY A; Wider K., 1997, BODILY NATURE CONSCI; WILKES KV, 1984, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V35, P223, DOI 10.1093/bjps/35.3.223 ; WILKES KV, 1988, CONSCIOUSNESS CONT S, P16; Wolfson H. A., 1935, HARVARD THEOLOGICAL, V28, P69, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0017816000022938; Yolton J.W., 1951, J HIST IDEAS, V12, P528; Zahavi D, 1998, ETUDES PHENOMENOLOGI, p[27, 127]; ZUCKER F, 1928, SYNEIDESIS-CONSCIENT","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/111.444.751",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","603ZW","WOS:000178592000002",,,,,"2018-01-02",33.0,"hettws armstrongdm armstrongdm arnaulda baeumkerc belldavid bernardw bernardw blocki blockn blockn blumenthalhj bonitzh bradishnc braune brehiere brentanof brentanofranz bruget burnyeatmyles burnyeatmf burnyeatm bywateri cancrinia castonv cramerkonrad davidsond daviescg dennettdanielc dretskef dretskef dretskef euckenr eversons findlayjn francescottirm gadamerhg gennarobj gibsonj goldmanaj grossmannr grossmannreinhardt hamlyndw hamlyndw hamlyndw hardiewfr harmang harmang harmang harrisonjohn harveyeruth henrichd henrichd herbartjf hicksrd hornhj husserle husserledmund johansentk jungg kahnch kanti kemps kemps kimjw klubertanzgp kosmanla krookd lautnerp lewiscs lewisfa lewisfa lewisfa lewisg lycanwg lycanwilliamg lycanwg lyonsw malcolmn mayerc michaele michaele milnera modrakd modrakdk mohrgeorg mondolfor mooregeorgeedward nadlersm neuhaeuserj nussbaummartha odalyg oehlerk oehlerklaus oehlerk osbornec peacockec piness pothastu rabbjdouglas rahmanf rodierg rortyr rosenthaldm rosenthaldm rosenthaldm rosenthaldm rosenthaldavid rosswd russellbertrand ryleg sartrejp sartrejeanpaul sartrejeanpaul scheerere schelljh schmitzh schuhlpm schwyzerhr sedleyd shoemakers shoemakers shoreyp siebeckh smithdw smithdavidwoodruff sorabjir sorabjirichard sorabjir sternecknh strohmaiergotthard stubenbergleopold stumpfc theissp thielu thielu thielu thielu thielu torstrika tsounav tugendhate wardyr widerk wilkeskv wilkeskv wolfsonha yoltonjw zahavid zuckerf aquilare","cluster_5"
-0.2604290209993211,-0.2364746487582395,10.0,81.0,81.0,0.0,0.0,1990.0,99.0,396.0,535.0,557.0,23.0,"J","TYE, M",,,,"TYE, M",,,"VAGUE OBJECTS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"TYE, M (reprint author), TEMPLE UNIV,COLL ARTS & SCI,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19122, USA.",,,,,,"EVANS G, 1978, ANALYSIS, P208; Fine Kit, 1975, SYNTHESE, V30, P265, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00485047; Kleene S. C, 1952, INTRO METAMATHEMATIC, P332; KRIPKE S, 1975, J PHILOS, V72, P690, DOI 10.2307/2024634 ; SALMON N, 1986, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, P110; SORENSEN R, 1986, BLIND SPOTS; TYE M, 1989, METAPHYSICS MIND, P43; TYE M, 1989, ANALYSIS JUN; UNGER P, 1979, SYNTHESE, P117; WHEELER S, 1979, SYNTHESE, P155","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","EG850","WOS:A1990EG85000002",,,,,"2018-01-02",34.0,"finekit kleenesc kripkes salmonn sorensenr tyem tyem ungerp wheelers evansg","cluster_0"
-0.1130630298720915,-0.12876077840985234,10.0,80.0,80.0,0.0,1.0,2000.0,109.0,435.0,455.0,479.0,25.0,"J","Melia, J",,,,"Melia, J",,,"Weaseling away the indispensability argument","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"According to the indispensability argument, the fact that we quantify over numbers, sets and functions in our best scientific theories gives us reason for believing that such objects exist. I examine a strategy to dispense with such quantification by simply replacing any given platonistic theory by the set of sentences in the nominalist vocabulary it logically entails. I argue that, as a strategy, this response fails: for there is no guarantee that the nominalist world that go beyond the set of sentences in the nominalist language such theories entail. However, I argue that what such theories show is that mathematics can enable us to express possibilities about the concrete world that may not be expressible in nominalistically acceptable language. While I grant that this may make quantification over abstracta indispensable, I deny that such indispensability is a reason for accepting them into our ontology. I urge that the nominalist should be allowed to quantify over abstracta whilst denying their existence and I explain how this apparently contradictory practice (a practice I call 'weaseling') is in fact coherent, unproblematic and rational. Finally, I examine the view that platonistic theories are simpler or more attractive than their nominalistic reformulations, and thus that abstract ought to be accepted into our ontology for the same sorts of reasons as other theoretical objects. I argue that, at least in the case of numbers, functions and sets, such arguments misunderstand the kind of simplicity and attractiveness we seek.","Univ York, Derwent Coll, York YO1 5DD, N Yorkshire, England","Melia, J (reprint author), Univ York, Derwent Coll, York YO1 5DD, N Yorkshire, England.",,,,,,"FIELD H, 1984, PHILOS REV, V93, P509, DOI 10.2307/2184826 ; FIELD H, 1980, SCI WITHOUT NUMBERS; FIELD H, 1985, J PHILOS, V81, P239; KREISEL G, 1970, ELEMENTS MATH LOGIC; Melia Joseph, 1998, ANALYSIS, V58, P63; Morgenbesser S., 1967, PHILOS SCI TODAY; [Anonymous], 1971, PHILOS LOGIC; Putnam H., 1975, PHILOS PAPERS, VI; Suppes Patrick, 1967, PHILOS SCI TODAY, P55; van Fraasen B., 1980, SCI IMAGE","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/109.435.455",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","359NB","WOS:000089616000003",,,,,"2018-01-02",35.0,"fieldh fieldh kreiselg meliajoseph morgenbessers putnamh suppespatrick vanfraasenb fieldh","cluster_0"
-0.07970643083705688,-0.10205774151647302,10.0,80.0,80.0,0.0,1.0,1991.0,100.0,397.0,1.0,17.0,17.0,"J","SCHIFFER, S",,,,"SCHIFFER, S",,,"CETERIS-PARIBUS LAWS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"SCHIFFER, S (reprint author), CUNY GRAD SCH & UNIV CTR,NEW YORK,NY 10036, USA.",,,,,,"Armstrong David, 1983, WHAT IS LAW NATURE; CARROLL JW, 1987, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V65, P261, DOI 10.1080/00048408712342931 ; CARTWRIGHT N, 1983, HOW LAWS PHYSICS LIE; CHURCHLAND PM, 1981, J PHILOS, V78, P67, DOI 10.2307/2025900 ; FIELD HH, 1977, J PHILOS, V74, P379; Fodor J., 1989, PHILOS TOPICS, V17, P59; Fodor J., 1987, PSYCHOSEMANTICS; LEPORE E, 1987, J PHILOS, V84, P630; LePore E., 1989, PHILOS TOPICS, V17, P175; van Fraassen Bas, 1989, LAWS SYMMETRY","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","EW928","WOS:A1991EW92800001",,,,,"2018-01-02",36.0,"carrolljw cartwrightn churchlandpm fieldhh fodorj fodorj leporee leporee vanfraassenbas armstrongdavid","cluster_0"
0.07138417541078888,0.06035639497735686,7.0,80.0,80.0,0.0,2.0,1961.0,70.0,279.0,291.0,306.0,16.0,"J","SMART, JJC",,,,"SMART, JJC",,,"FREE-WILL, PRAISE AND BLAME","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"ARISTOTLE, PHYSICS, P460; BALCHIN N, ANATOMY VILLAINY, P174; EDWARDS P, 1958, DETERMINISM FREEDOM, P104; LAPLACE, 1814, THEORIE ANAL PROBABI, pR2; Raab F. V., 1955, PHILOS REV, V64, P60; URMSON, LOGIC LANGUAGE, P159; 1956, P BRIT ACADEMY, P109","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","CCP49","WOS:A1961CCP4900001",,,,,"2018-01-02",37.0,"balchinn edwardsp laplace raabfv urmson aristotle","cluster_4"
-0.13420511016358286,0.05242046936061542,16.0,78.0,78.0,0.0,1.0,2002.0,111.0,441.0,47.0,68.0,22.0,"J","Sreenivasan, G",,,,"Sreenivasan, G",,,"Errors about errors: Virtues theory and trait attribution","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"CONSISTENCY","This paper examines the implications of certain social psychological experiments for moral theory--specifically, for virtue theory. Gilbert Harman and John Doris have recently argued that the empirical evidence offered by 'situationism' demonstrates that there is no such thing as a character trait. I dispute this conclusion. My discussion focuses on the proper interpretation of the experimental data--the data themselves I grant for the sake of argument. I develop three criticisms of the anti-trait position. Of these, the central criticism concerns three respects in which the experimental situations employed to test someone's character trait are inadequate to the task. First, they do not take account of the subject's own construal of the situation. Second, they include behaviour that is only marginally relevant to the trait in question. Third, they disregard the normative character of the responses in which virtue theory is interested. Given these inadequacies in situationism's operationalized conception of a 'character trait', I argue that situationism does not really address the proposition that people have 'character traits' properly understood. A fortiori, the social psychological evidence does not refute that proposition. I also adduce some limited experimental evidence in favour of character traits and distil two lessons we can nevertheless learn form situationism.","Natl Inst Health, Warren G Magnuson Clinical Ctr, Dept Clinical Bioethics, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA","Sreenivasan, G (reprint author), Natl Inst Health, Warren G Magnuson Clinical Ctr, Dept Clinical Bioethics, Bldg 10 Rm IC118, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA.",,,,,,"BATSON CD, 1978, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V4, P97, DOI 10.1177/014616727800400120 ; BEM DJ, 1983, NEBRASKA S MOTIVATIO; Blackburn S., 1998, RULING PASSIONS; DARLEY JM, 1973, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V27, P100, DOI 10.1037/h0034449 ; DORIS J, IN PRESS LACK CHARAC; Doris JM, 1998, NOUS, V32, P504, DOI 10.1111/0029-4624.00136 ; FLANAGAN O, 1919, VARIETIES MORAL PERS; Harman Gilbert, 1999, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V99, P315, DOI DOI 10.1111/1467-9264.00062; Harman G., 2000, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V100, P223, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.0066-7372.2003.00013.X; Hartshorne H., 1928, STUDIES NATURE CHARA; KUNDA Z, 1986, COGNITIVE PSYCHOL, V18, P195, DOI 10.1016/0010-0285(86)90012-5; LORD CG, 1982, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V42, P1076; MISCHEL W, 1982, PSYCHOL REV, V89, P730, DOI 10.1037/0033-295X.89.6.730; Mischel Walter, 1990, HDB PERSONALITY THEO; Railton Peter, 1995, CANADIAN J PHILOS S, V21, P79; ROSS L, 1991, PERSONS SITUATION PE","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/111.441.47",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","528BC","WOS:000174222700005",,,,,"2018-01-02",38.0,"bemdj blackburns darleyjm dorisj dorisjm flanagano harmangilbert harmang hartshorneh kundaz lordcg mischelw mischelwalter railtonpeter rossl batsoncd","cluster_6"
-2.0720215100866612,-1.9134307066544098,98.0,78.0,79.0,0.0,2.0,1996.0,105.0,417.0,1.0,80.0,80.0,"J","OLIVER, A",,,,"OLIVER, A",,,"THE METAPHYSICS OF PROPERTIES","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"STRUCTURAL UNIVERSALS; MATHEMATICS; NOMINALISM",,,"OLIVER, A (reprint author), UNIV CAMBRIDGE GONVILLE & CAIUS COLL,CAMBRIDGE CB2 1TA,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"ALSTON WP, 1958, PHILOS STUD, V9, P8, DOI 10.1007/BF00797866 ; ARMSTRONG DM, 1991, MIND, V100, P189; ARMSTRONG DM, 1986, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V64, P85, DOI 10.1080/00048408612342261 ; ARMSTRONG DM, 1980, PAC PHILOS QUART, V61, P440; ARMSTRONG DM, WHAT IS LAW NATURE; ARMSTRONG DM, UNIVERSALS OPINIONAT; ARMSTRONG DM, NOMINALISM REALISM; ARMSTRONG DM, THEORY UNIVERSALS; ARMSTRONG DM, COMBINATIONAL THEORY; Armstrong D. M., 1988, SCI REFLECTION, P103; BACON J, UNIVERSALS PROPERTY-; BACON J, 1993, ONTOLOGY CAUSALITY M; BARWISE J, STITUATIONS ATTITUDE; Bealer G., QUALITY CONCEPT; BENACERRAF P, 1965, PHILOS REV, V74, P47, DOI 10.2307/2183530 ; BIGELOW J, 1990, PHYSICALISM MATH, P291; BIGELOW J, REALITY NUMBERS; Brand Myles, 1976, ACTION THEORY; CAMPBELL K, METAPHYSICS INTRO; CAMPBELL K, ABSTRACT PARTICULARS; Campbell K., 1981, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V6, p[477, 125]; CARNAP R, MEANING NECESSITY; CHIERCHIA G, 1989, PROPERTIES TYPES MEA; DALY C, 1994, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V94, P254; DAVIDSON D, INQUIRIES TRUTH INTE; DEVITT M, 1980, PAC PHILOS QUART, V61, P433; DEVITT M, LANGUAGE REALITY; DRETSKE FI, 1977, PHILOS SCI, V44, P248, DOI 10.1086/288741 ; FODOR JA, 1985, MIND, V94, P76; FODOR JA, LANGUAGE THOUGHT; FORREST P, 1986, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V64, P15, DOI 10.1080/00048408612342201 ; Forrest P., 1993, ONTOLOGY CAUSALITY M, P45; Foster L., 1970, EXPERIENCE THEORY; FOX JF, 1987, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V65, P188, DOI 10.1080/00048408712342871 ; Frege Gottlob, 1980, TRANSLATIONS PHILOS, P21; FRENCH PA, 1981, MIDW STUDIES PHILOS, V6; GEACH P, 1980, TRANSLATIONS PHILOS; Goodman Nelson, 1970, EXPERIENCE THEORY, P19; GOODMAN N, 1986, PHILOS WV QUINE, P159; Hahn L.E., 1986, PHILOS WV QUINE; HIRSH E, DIVIDING REALITY; Irvine A., 1990, PHYSICALISM MATH; JACKSON F, 1977, MIND, V86, P427; Johnston M., 1987, ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V61, P107; JUBIEN M, 1989, PHILOS TOPICS, V17, P91; JUBIEN M, 1989, PROPERTIES TYPES MEA, P159; Kim Jaegwon, 1976, ACTION THEORY, P159; KRIPKE S, WITTGENSTEIN RULES P; Leonard Henry S., 1940, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V5, P45; LEWIS D, 1986, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V64, P25, DOI 10.1080/00048408612342211 ; LEWIS D, 1992, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V70, P211, DOI 10.1080/00048409212345101 ; LEWIS D, 1983, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V61, P343, DOI 10.1080/00048408312341131 ; LEWIS D, 1986, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V64, P92, DOI 10.1080/00048408612342281 ; Lewis David, 1983, PHILOS PAPERS, V1, P189; LEWIS D, COUNTERFACTUALS; LEWIS D, PLURALITY WORLDS; LEWIS DK, 1968, J PHILOS, V65, P113, DOI 10.2307/2024555 ; LEWIS DK, PARTS CLASSES; MADDY P, REALISM MATH; MARTIN CB, 1980, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V58, P3, DOI 10.1080/00048408012341001 ; MELLOR DH, FACTS CAUSATION; MENZIES P, 1989, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V67, P59, DOI 10.1080/00048408912343681 ; MONTAGUE R, 1974, FORMAL PHILOS SELECT, P148; MORTENSEN C, 1987, REV INT PHILOS, V41, P97; MULLIGAN K, 1984, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V44, P287, DOI 10.2307/2107686 ; NERLICH G, 1976, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V54, P58, DOI 10.1080/00048407612341041 ; OLIVER A, 1992, MIND, V101, P129, DOI 10.1093/mind/101.401.129 ; OLIVER A, 1993, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V93, P179; Pap Arthur, 1959, PHILOS Q, V9, P330; PRICE HH, THINKING EXPERIENCE; PUTNAM H, MIND LANGUAGE REALIT; QUINE W. V., LOGICAL POINT VIEW; QUINE WV, ONTOLOGICAL REALITY; QUINE WV, PHILOS LOGIC; Quine W., 1947, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V12, P105; QUINE WVO, WORD OBJECT; Quine W.V., 1951, PHILOS STUD, V2, P11, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02198233; QUINTON A, 1958, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V58, P33; QUINTON A, NATURE THINGS; RESNIK M, 1982, NOUS, V16, P96; RESNIK MD, 1988, REV INT PHILOS, V42, P400; RESNIK MD, 1981, NOUS, V15, P529, DOI 10.2307/2214851 ; Russell Bertrand, PROBLEMS PHILOS; SHAPIRO S, 1983, PHILOS SCI, V50, P523, DOI 10.1086/289138 ; Shapiro S., 1989, PHILOS TOPICS, V17, P145; SIMONS P, 1994, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V54, P553, DOI 10.2307/2108581 ; SKYRMS B, 1981, PHILOS STUD, V40, P199, DOI 10.1007/BF00353791 ; TAYLOR B, 1993, MIND, V102, P81, DOI 10.1093/mind/102.405.81 ; Thomason R., 1974, FORMAL PHILOS SELECT; TOOLEY M, 1977, CAN J PHILOS, V7, P667; TOOLEY M, CAUSATION REALIST AP; ULLMANNMARGALIT E, 1988, SCI REFLECTION; URMASON JO, 1986, PHILOS ANCIENT MODER, P245; VESEY G, 1986, PHILOS ANCIENT MODER; WIGGINS D, 1984, PHILOS QUART, V34, P311, DOI 10.2307/2218763 ; WILLIAMS DC, 1986, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V64, P1, DOI 10.1080/00048408612342191 ; Williams D. C., 1953, REV METAPHYS, V7, P171; Williams D.C., 1953, REV METAPHYS, VVII, p[3, 171]","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/105.417.1",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","TT053","WOS:A1996TT05300001",,,,,"2018-01-02",39.0,"armstrongdm armstrongdm armstrongdm armstrongdm armstrongdm armstrongdm armstrongdm armstrongdm armstrongdm baconj baconj barwisej bealerg benacerrafp bigelowj bigelowj brandmyles campbellk campbellk campbellk carnapr chierchiag dalyc davidsond devittm devittm dretskefi fodorja fodorja forrestp forrestp fosterl foxjf fregegottlob frenchpa geachp goodmannelson goodmann hahnle hirshe irvinea jacksonf johnstonm jubienm jubienm kimjaegwon kripkes leonardhenrys lewisd lewisd lewisd lewisd lewisdavid lewisd lewisd lewisdk lewisdk maddyp martincb mellordh menziesp montaguer mortensenc mulligank nerlichg olivera olivera paparthur pricehh putnamh quinewv quinewv quinewv quinew quinewvo quinewv quintona quintona resnikm resnikmd resnikmd russellbertrand shapiros shapiros simonsp skyrmsb taylorb thomasonr tooleym tooleym ullmannmargalite urmasonjo veseyg wigginsd williamsdc williamsdc williamsdc alstonwp","cluster_3"
-0.46111133787082653,-0.5460460147997787,29.0,78.0,81.0,0.0,4.0,1985.0,94.0,373.0,76.0,100.0,25.0,"J","FODOR, JA",,,,"FODOR, JA",,,"FODOR GUIDE TO MENTAL REPRESENTATION - THE INTELLIGENT AUNTIES VADE-MECUM","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"FODOR, JA (reprint author), MIT,DEPT LINGUIST & PHILOSOPHY 20-D,CAMBRIDGE,MA 02149, USA.",,,,,,"Barwise J., 1983, SITUATIONS ATTITUDES; Block N., 1980, READINGS PHILOS PSYC, V1 and 2; BLOCK N, 1980, READINGS PHILOS PSYC, V2; CHURCHLAND P, 1981, J PHILOS, V78, P2; Cummins R, 1983, NATURE PSYCHOL EXPLA; Dennett D., 1981, SCI EXPLANATION PAPE; Dennett D. C., 1978, BRAINSTORMS; Dretske F., 1981, KNOWLEDGE FLOW INFOR; Dreyfus H., 1979, WHAT COMPUTERS CANT; Field H, 1978, ERKENNTNIS, V13, P9; FODOR J, UNPUB PSYCHOSEMANTIC; FODOR J, 1978, MONIST, V61; FODOR JA, UNPUB SYNTHESE; FODOR JA, UNPUB SOMETHING STAT; FODOR JA, 1981, SCI AM, V244, P515; FODOR JA, 1980, BEHAVIORAL BRAIN SCI, V3; Fodor JA, 1979, LANGUAGE THOUGHT; FODOR JA, UNPUB; GLYMOUR C, UNPUB ANDROID EPISTE; HAUGELAND J, 1981, BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN SC, V2, P215; Loar B., 1981, MIND MEANING; MATTHEWS R, UNPUB SOCIAL RES; PUTNAM H, MEANING HOLISM; Putnam H., 1983, PHILOS PAPERS, V3; SEARLE JR, 1980, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V3, P417, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X00005756 ; STABLER EP, 1983, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V6, P391, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X00016678 ; Stampe Dennis, 1977, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V2, P42; Stich S., 1983, FOLK PSYCHOL COGNITI; Vendler Z., 1972, RES COGITANS","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","ABX79","WOS:A1985ABX7900007",,,,,"2018-01-02",40.0,"blockn blockn churchlandp cumminsr dennettd dennettdc dretskef dreyfush fieldh fodorj fodorj fodorja fodorja fodorja fodorja fodorja fodorja glymourc haugelandj loarb matthewsr putnamh putnamh searlejr stablerep stampedennis stichs vendlerz barwisej","cluster_0"
-0.3540158743416625,1.0490848136772157,15.0,76.0,77.0,0.0,7.0,1985.0,94.0,374.0,196.0,209.0,14.0,"J","FOOT, P",,,,"FOOT, P",,,"UTILITARIANISM AND THE VIRTUES","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"FOOT, P (reprint author), UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES,LOS ANGELES,CA 90024, USA.",,,,,,"ADAMS R, 1976, J PHILOS, V73; BENTHAM J, 1789, INTRO PRINCIPLES LEG; FOOT P, OBJECTIVITY VALUE ES; Geach P. T., 1956, ANALYSIS, V17, P33, DOI DOI 10.1093/ANALYS/17.2.33; Harsanyi John, 1977, SOCIAL RES, V44; Mill J. S., 1863, UTILITARIANISM; NAGEL T, 1980, TANNER LECTURES, V1, P131; Parfit D., 1984, REASONS PERSONS; PARFIT D, 1979, P BRIT ACADEMY, V65, P556; Rawls John, 1971, THEORY JUSTICE; Scanlon T. M, 1982, UTILITARIANISM, P103; Scheffler Samuel, 1982, REJECTION CONSEQUENT; SEN A, 1979, J PHILOS, V76, P463, DOI 10.2307/2025934 ; SEN A, 1982, PHILOS PUBLIC AFF, V11, P3; Wittgenstein L., PHILOS INVESTIGATION","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","AGR44","WOS:A1985AGR4400002",,,,,"2018-01-02",41.0,"benthamj footp geachpt harsanyijohn milljs nagelt parfitd parfitd rawlsjohn scanlontm schefflersamuel sena sena wittgensteinl adamsr","cluster_4"
-0.05087947349882718,0.0497544796390418,6.0,73.0,73.0,0.0,2.0,2007.0,116.0,462.0,359.0,370.0,12.0,"J","Broome, J",,,,"Broome, John",,,"Wide or narrow scope?","MIND",,,"English","Editorial Material",,,,,,,,"This paper is a response to 'Why Be Rational?' by Niko Kolodny. Kolodny argues that we have no reason to satisfy the requirements of rationality. His argument assumes that these requirements have a logically narrow scope. To see what the question of scope turns on, this comment provides a semantics for 'requirement'. It shows that requirements of rationality have a wide scope, at least under one sense of 'requirement'. Consequently Kolodny's conclusion cannot be derived.","Univ Oxford Corpus Christi Coll, Oxford OX1 4JF, England","Broome, J (reprint author), Univ Oxford Corpus Christi Coll, Oxford OX1 4JF, England.","john.broome@philosophy.ox.ac.uk",,,,,"BROOME J, 2005, PHILOS ISSUES, V15, P321; Broome J., 2007, HOMAGE WLODEK PHILOS; CASTANEDA HN, 1968, J PHILOS, V65, P439, DOI 10.2307/2024296 ; Kolodny N, 2005, MIND, V114, P509, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzi223; RONNOWRSMUSSEN T, 2007, HOMAGE WLODEK PHILOS; Van Fraassen B. C., 1973, J PHILOS, V70, P5","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzm359",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","154MK","WOS:000245511400005",,,,,"2018-01-02",42.0,"broomej castanedahn kolodnyn ronnowrsmussent vanfraassenbc broomej","cluster_6"
-0.5178010553550939,-0.24168787513219886,32.0,72.0,72.0,0.0,0.0,2001.0,110.0,437.0,45.0,98.0,54.0,"J","Wright, C",,,,"Wright, C",,,"On being in a quandary - Relativism, vagueness, logical revisionism","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"EPISTEMIC CONCEPTION",,"Univ St Andrews, Dept Logic & Metaphysics, St Andrews KY16 9AL, Fife, Scotland","Wright, C (reprint author), Univ St Andrews, Dept Logic & Metaphysics, St Andrews KY16 9AL, Fife, Scotland.",,,,,,"Blackburn S., 1999, TRUTH; BLACKBURN S, RULING PASSIONS; BLACKBURN S, SPREADING WORD; CAMPBELL R, 1974, PHILOS STUD, V26, P175, DOI 10.1007/BF00398877 ; CARGILE J, 1969, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V20, P193, DOI 10.1093/bjps/20.3.193 ; CARGILE J, PARADOXES; Chambers T, 1998, MONIST, V81, P343, DOI 10.5840/monist19988124 ; Fine Kit, 1975, SYNTHESE, V30, P265, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00485047; Fitch Frederick B., 1963, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V28, P135, DOI DOI 10.2307/2271594; GIBBARD A, WISE CHOICES APT FEE; HALDANE J, 1992, REALITY REPRESENTATI; HALE B, 1986, PHILOS QUART, V36, P65, DOI 10.2307/2219312 ; HALE B, 1992, REALITY REPRESENTATI, P337; HALE B, IN PRESS PHILOS PHEN; HARMAN G, MORAL RELATIVISM MOR; HARMAN G, 1996, PHILOS PHENOMENOLOGI, V58, P161; HORWICH P, TRUTH; LYNCH MP, IN PRESS NATURE TRUT; PUTNAM H, 1983, REALISM REASON, P271; READ S, 1985, ANALYSIS, V45, P56, DOI 10.2307/3327406 ; Salerno J, 2000, PHILOS STUD, V99, P211, DOI 10.1023/A:1018773127328 ; SHAPIRO S, 1996, J PHILOS, V93, P74, DOI 10.2307/2940904 ; SORENSEN RA, BLINDSPOTS; WILLIAMSON T, 1996, ANALYSIS, V56, P39, DOI 10.1111/j.0003-2638.1996.00039.x ; WILLIAMSON T, VAGUENESS; Williamson T., 1992, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V66, P145; WILLIAMSON T, 1996, PHILOS PAPERS, V25, P47; WRIGHT C, 1995, SOUTHERN J PHILOS, V33, P133, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-6962.1995.tb00767.x ; WRIGHT C, IN PRESS NATURE TRUT; WRIGHT C, TRUTH OBJECTIVITY; Wright Crispin J. G., 1998, CANADIAN J PHILOS, V24, P31; WRIGHT C, REALISM MEANING TRUT","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/110.437.45",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","406EB","WOS:000167201000003",,,,,"2018-01-02",43.0,"blackburns blackburns campbellr cargilej cargilej chamberst finekit fitchfrederickb gibbarda haldanej haleb haleb haleb harmang harmang horwichp lynchmp putnamh reads salernoj shapiros sorensenra williamsont williamsont williamsont williamsont wrightc wrightc wrightc wrightcrispinjg wrightc blackburns","cluster_0"
-0.5318950203079242,-0.5107765504555039,37.0,71.0,72.0,1.0,1.0,1997.0,106.0,423.0,429.0,450.0,22.0,"J","Cappelen, H; Lepore, E",,,,"Cappelen, H; Lepore, E",,,"Varieties of quotation","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"RUTGERS STATE UNIV,CTR COGNIT SCI,NEW BRUNSWICK,NJ 08903","Cappelen, H (reprint author), VASSAR COLL,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,POUGHKEEPSIE,NY 12601, USA.",,,,,,"Almog J., 1989, THEMES KAPLAN; Anderson C. A., 1990, PROPOSITIONAL ATTITU; Anderson Stephen R., 1973, FESTSCHRIFT M HALLE; BALDWIN T, 1982, PHILOS STUD, P255; CAPPELEN H, IN PRESS ALLEGED CON; CAPPELEN H, 1997, THESIS U CALIF BERKE; CARNAP R, MEANING NECESSITY; CARNAP R, LOGICAL SYNTAX LANGU; CHOMSKY N, LECTURES GOVT BINDIN; CHURCH A, 1954, PHILOS STUD, V5, P65; Church Alonso, 1950, ANALYSIS, V10, P97; CRIMMINS M, 1989, J PHILOS, V86, P685, DOI 10.2307/2027014 ; CRIMMINS M, TALK ABOUT BELIEF; Davidson D., 1984, INQUIRIES TRUTH INTE, P93; Davidson D., 1984, INQUIRIES TRUTH INTE, P155; Davidson D., 1984, INQUIRIES TRUTH INTE, P79; GEACH PT, LOGIC MATTERS; GEACH PT, MENTAL ACTS; Higginbotham James, 1986, TRUTH INTERPRETATION, P29; LARSON R, KNOWLEDGE MEANING IN; LARSON RK, 1993, SYNTHESE, V95, P305, DOI 10.1007/BF01063877 ; LEPORE E, 1990, PROPOSITIONAL ATTITU; LEPORE E, 1989, MIDW STUDIES PHILOS, P338; Partee B., 1973, FESTSCHRIFT M HALLE, P410; PLATTS M, WAYS MEANING; QUINE W. V., LOGICAL POINT VIEW; QUINE WVO, WORD OBJECT; QUINE WVO, 1956, J PHILOS 0301, P177; RICHARD M, PROPOSITIONAL ATTITU; SCHEFFLER I, 1954, ANALYSIS, V10, P83; SEGAL G, 1989, J PHILOS, V86, P73, DOI 10.2307/2027077 ; SELLARS W, 1955, ANALYSIS, V15, P117; SEYMOUR M, 1994, PHILOS STUD, V74, P1; Soames Scott, 1989, THEMES KAPLAN, P393; Tarski A, 1956, LOGIC SEMANTICS META, P152; WASHINGTON C, 1992, J PHILOS, V89, P582, DOI 10.2307/2941057 ; WETTSTEIN H, 1989, MIDW STUDIES PHILOS","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/106.423.429",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","XH166","WOS:A1997XH16600003",,,,,"2018-01-02",44.0,"andersonca andersonstephenr baldwint cappelenh cappelenh carnapr carnapr chomskyn churcha churchalonso crimminsm crimminsm davidsond davidsond davidsond geachpt geachpt higginbothamjames larsonr larsonrk leporee leporee parteeb plattsm quinewv quinewvo quinewvo richardm scheffleri segalg sellarsw seymourm soamesscott tarskia washingtonc wettsteinh almogj","cluster_0"
-0.539131848825336,-0.4618748658532365,39.0,71.0,73.0,0.0,0.0,1994.0,103.0,411.0,351.0,372.0,22.0,"J","WILSON, RA",,,,"WILSON, RA",,,"WIDE COMPUTATIONALISM","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"PERCEPTUAL CONTENT; INDIVIDUALISM",,,"WILSON, RA (reprint author), QUEENS UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,KINGSTON K7L 3N6,ONTARIO,CANADA.",,,,,,"BENNETT J, 1989, RATIONALITY ESSAY AN; BLOCK N, 1981, READINGS PHILOS PSYC, V2; BLOCK N, 1990, MIND COGNITION READE, P444; Boyd Richard, 1991, PHILOS SCI; CAMPBELL FW, 1968, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V197, P151; Clark A., 1993, ASSOCIATIVE ENGINES; Clark Andy, 1989, MICROCOGNITION; COSMIDES L, 1989, COGNITION, V31, P187, DOI 10.1016/0010-0277(89)90023-1 ; Cosmides L., 1987, LATEST BEST ESSAYS E, P277; DAVIES M, 1991, MIND, V100, P461; Devitt Michael, 1990, MIND COGNITION, P371; Devitt M., 1991, MEANING MIND FODOR H, P95; Dupre J., 1987, LATEST BEST; EGAN F, 1992, MIND, V101, P443, DOI 10.1093/mind/101.403.443 ; FIELD H, 1981, READINGS PHILOS PSYC, V2, P78; Fodor J., 1987, PSYCHOSEMANTICS; Fodor J., 1983, MODULARITY MIND; Fodor J.A., 1981, REPRESENTATIONS, P225; GALLISTEL CR, 1989, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V40, P155, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ps.40.020189.001103 ; Gallistel C. R., 1989, ORG LEARNING; HARMAN G, 1988, COGNITION REPRESENTA, P1; HARMAN G., 1987, NEW DIRECTIONS SEMAN, p[55, 61]; HIRSHFELD L, 1994, DOMAIN SPECIFICITY C; Kitcher Patricia, 1991, PHILOS SCI, P671; Lepore Ernest, 1987, NEW DIRECTIONS SEMAN; LYCAN WG, 1990, MIND COGNITION; ROLLINS M, 1989, MENTAL IMAGERY; Schiffer S., 1988, COGNITION REPRESENTA; SEARLE JR, 1981, MIND DESIGN, P282; SEGAL G, 1989, PHILOS REV, V98, P189, DOI 10.2307/2185282 ; SEGAL G, 1991, MIND, V100, P485; Sekuler Robert, 1990, PERCEPTION; SPERBER D, 1994, DOMAIN SPECIFICITY C; Stich S., 1983, FOLK PSYCHOL COGNITI; WILSON RA, 1992, PHILOS STUD, V68, P103, DOI 10.1007/BF00354473 ; WILSON RA, 1994, PHILOS SCI, V61, P55, DOI 10.1086/289780; WILSON RA, 1993, PAC PHILOS QUART, V74, P60; WILSON RA, IN PRESS SYNTHESE; WILSON RA, IN PRESS CARTESIAN P","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/103.411.351",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","NY276","WOS:A1994NY27600005",,,,,"2018-01-02",45.0,"blockn blockn boydrichard campbellfw clarka clarkandy cosmidesl cosmidesl daviesm devittmichael devittm duprej eganf fieldh fodorj fodorj fodorja gallistelcr gallistelcr harmang harmang hirshfeldl kitcherpatricia leporeernest lycanwg rollinsm schiffers searlejr segalg segalg sekulerrobert sperberd stichs wilsonra wilsonra wilsonra wilsonra wilsonra bennettj","cluster_0"
-0.41191386447571987,-0.3928277555654858,49.0,70.0,70.0,0.0,0.0,2000.0,109.0,436.0,781.0,823.0,43.0,"J","Rumfitt, I",,,,"Rumfitt, I",,,"'Yes' and 'No'","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"In what does the sense of a sentential connective consist? Like many others, I hold that its sense lies in rules that govern deductions. In the present paper, however, I argue that a classical logician should take the relevant deductions to be arguments involving affirmative or negative answers to yes-or-no questions that contain the connective. An intuitionistic logician will differ in concentrating exclusively upon affirmative answers. I conclude by arguing that a well known intuitionistic criticism of classical logic fails if the answer 'No' is accorded parity with the answer 'Yes'.","Univ Coll, Oxford OX1 4BJ, England","Rumfitt, I (reprint author), Univ Coll, Oxford OX1 4BJ, England.",,,,,,"Belnap N., 1962, ANALYSIS, V22, P130, DOI DOI 10.1093/ANALYS/22.6.130; BENDALL K, 1978, J PHILOS LOGIC, V7, P245; Bendall Kent, 1979, NOTRE DAME J FORM L, V20, P68; BORICIC BR, 1985, J PHILOS LOGIC, V14, P359, DOI 10.1007/BF00649481 ; Carnap R., 1943, FORMALIZATION LOGIC; CELLUCCI C, 1992, ANN PURE APPL LOGIC, V58, P111, DOI 10.1016/0168-0072(92)90002-H ; DUMMETT M, 1959, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V59, P141; Dummett Michael, 1978, TRUTH OTHER ENIGMAS; Dummett Michael, 1969, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V69, P239; Dummett M., 1963, REALISM, P145; Dummett M., 1981, FREGE PHILOS LANGUAG; Dummett M., 1976, TRUTH MEANING, P67; Dummett M., 1973, P BRIT ACAD, V59, P201; EVANS MGJ, 1976, TRUTH MEANING ESSAYS; Frege G., 1884, GRUNDLAGEN ARITHMETI; FREGE G, KURZE UBERSICHT MEIN; FREGE G, GEDANKENGEFUGE; FREGE G, VERNEINUNG; Frege G, 1984, COLLECTED PAPERS; Frege Gottlob, 1990, KLEINE SCHRIFTEN; Frege Gottlob, 1979, POSTHUMOUS WRITINGS; FREGE G, LOGIK; Frege G., 1969, NACHGELASSENE SCHRIF; Gabbay D. M., 1999, WHAT IS NEGATION; GEACH PT, 1965, PHILOS REV, V74, P449, DOI 10.2307/2183123 ; Gentzen G, 1935, MATH Z, V39, P176, DOI 10.1007/BF01201353 ; GENTZEN G., 1969, COLLECTED PAPERS; Godel K, 1933, ANZEIGER AKADEMIE WI, V69, P65; Godel K., 1986, COLLECTED WORKS; HACKING I, 1979, J PHILOS, V76, P285, DOI 10.2307/2025471 ; Heck R., 1997, LANGUAGE THOUGHT LOG; HUMBERSTONE IL, IN PRESS REVIVAL REJ; KASBAUER M, 1962, LOGIK LOGIKKALKKUL; KNEALE W., 1956, CONT BRIT PHILOS, P237; KUTSCHERA FV, 1962, LOGIK LOGIKKALKKUL, P221; Lewis H. D., 1956, CONT BRIT PHILOS; McDowell John, 1976, TRUTH MEANING, P42; MCDOWELL JH, 1997, LANGUAGE THOUGHT LOG, P105; Peacocke C., 1987, P BRIT ACAD, V73, P153; Prawitz D., 1965, NATURAL DEDUCTION PR; PRICE H, 1983, MIND, V92, P161; PRICE H, 1990, MIND, V99, P221; PRIOR AN, 1960, ANALYSIS, V21, P129; Rumfitt I, 1997, ANALYSIS, V57, P223, DOI 10.1111/1467-8284.00080 ; Shoesmith D. J., 1978, MULTIPLE CONCLUSION; SMILEY T, 1996, ANALYSIS, V56, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.0003-2638.1996.00001.x ; Tennant Neil, 1999, WHAT IS NEGATION, P199; Tennant Neil, 1987, ANTI REALISM LOGIC T; WRIGHT CJG, 1992, MIND, V102, P123","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/109.436.781",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","375LV","WOS:000165401700004",,,,,"2018-01-02",46.0,"bendallk bendallkent boricicbr carnapr celluccic dummettm dummettmichael dummettmichael dummettm dummettm dummettm dummettm evansmgj fregeg fregeg fregeg fregeg fregeg fregegottlob fregegottlob fregeg fregeg gabbaydm geachpt gentzeng gentzeng godelk godelk hackingi heckr humberstoneil kasbauerm knealew kutscherafv lewishd mcdowelljohn mcdowelljh peacockec prawitzd priceh priceh prioran rumfitti shoesmithdj smileyt tennantneil tennantneil wrightcjg belnapn","cluster_0"
-0.5682012242095379,-0.605129433612154,33.0,68.0,68.0,0.0,0.0,1999.0,108.0,429.0,69.0,94.0,26.0,"J","Ketland, J",,,,"Ketland, J",,,"Deflationism and Tarski's paradise (Truth, logic, mathematical theories)","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, London WC2A 2AE, England","Ketland, J (reprint author), Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, London WC2A 2AE, England.",,,,,,"Ayer Alfred Jules, 1936, LANGUAGE TRUTH LOGIC; Beth E. W., 1953, INDAGATIONES MATH, V15, P330; Boolos G. S., 1989, COMPUTABILITY LOGIC; BURGESS JP, 1997, SUBJECT NO OBJECT ST; David Marian, 1994, CORRES DISQUOTATION; FIELD H, 1980, SCI WITHOUT NUMBERS; Field H., 1989, REALISM MATH MODALIT; FIELD HH, PHILOS TOPICS, V19; FIELD HH, PHILOS TOPICS, V13; FREGE G, Z PHILOS PHILOS KRIT, V100; GEACH P, 1980, PHILOS WRITINGS G FR; Haack S., 1978, PHILOS LOGICS; HELLMAN G, 1989, MATH WITHOUT NUMBERS; Horwich P., 1990, TRUTH; KIRKHAM RL, 1992, THEORIES TRUTH; KRIPKE S, 1975, J PHILOS, V72, P690, DOI 10.2307/2024634 ; Leeds S., 1978, ERKENNTNIS, V13, P111; LUCAS JR, 1961, PHILOSOPHY, V36, P120; Martin R.L., 1984, RECENT ESSAYS TRUTH; Padoa A., 1903, ENSEIGNMENT MATH, V5, P85; Penrose R., 1990, EMPERORS NEW MIND; Putnam H., 1981, REASON TRUTH HIST; Putnam H., 1979, MATH MATTER METHOD P; [Anonymous], 1971, PHILOS LOGIC; Quine Willard Van Orman, 1960, WORD OBJECT; Quine W.V., 1995, STIMULUS SCI; Quine W. V., 1970, PHILOS LOGIC; Quine W. V. O., 1980, LOGICAL POINT VIEW; Ramsey F., 1927, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V7, P153; SHAPIRO S, 1983, J PHILOS, V80, P521, DOI 10.2307/2026112 ; SPINOZA B, 1677, IMPROVEMENT UNDERSTA; TARSKI A, CONCEPT TRUTH FORMAL; WOODGER JH, 1956, LOGIC SEMANTICS META","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/108.429.69",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","162JL","WOS:000078342400004",,,,,"2018-01-02",47.0,"bethew boolosgs burgessjp davidmarian fieldh fieldh fieldhh fieldhh fregeg geachp haacks hellmang horwichp kirkhamrl kripkes leedss lucasjr martinrl padoaa penroser putnamh putnamh quinewillardvanorman quinewv quinewv quinewvo ramseyf shapiros spinozab tarskia woodgerjh ayeralfredjules","cluster_0"
-0.5001548701219635,-0.4701921780222417,47.0,66.0,66.0,0.0,0.0,2001.0,110.0,439.0,637.0,687.0,51.0,"J","Recanati, F",,,,"Recanati, F",,,"Open quotation (Semantics, pragmatics)","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"The issues addressed in philosophical papers on quotation generally concern only a particular type of quotation, which I call 'closed quotation'. The other main type, 'open quotation', is ignored, and this neglect leads to bad theorizing. Not only is a general theory of quotation out of reach: the specific phenomenon of closed quotation itself cannot be properly understood if it is not appropriately situated within the kind to which it belongs. Once the distinction between open and closed quotation has been drawn and properly appreciated, it is tempting to consider that only closed quotation is relevant to semantics. Open quotation is more a matter of pragmatics: it is a matter of what people do with words, rather than a matter of content and truth-conditions. In this way one can provide the beginning of a justification for the neglect of open quotation in current semantic theorizing. There is some truth in this view, yet the phenomenon of 'mixed quotation', investigated at length in this paper, is interesting precisely because it shows that things are not so simple. Important issues concerning the interface between semantics and pragmatics will thus be raised.","CNRS Inst Jean Nicod, F-75007 Paris, France","Recanati, F (reprint author), CNRS Inst Jean Nicod, 1 Bis Ave Lowendal, F-75007 Paris, France.",,,,,,"Almog J., 1989, THEMES KAPLAN; ANSCOMBRE JC, 1977, LINGUA, V43, P23, DOI 10.1016/0024-3841(77)90046-8 ; AUSTIN J. L., 1975, HOW DO THINGS WORDS; Bach K, 1999, LINGUIST PHILOS, V22, P327, DOI 10.1023/A:1005466020243 ; BARHILLEL Y, 1954, ASPECTS LANGUAGE, P69; BROMBERGER S, 1989, REFLECTIONS CHOMSKY, P58; CAPPELEN H, 1997, IND, V106, P429; CAPPELEN H, 1999, PHILOS LINGUISTICS, P279; CARNAP Rudolf, 1937, LOGICAL SYNTAX LANGU; CHRISTENSEN NE, 1967, PHILOS REV, V76, P358, DOI 10.2307/2183624 ; CLARK HH, 1990, LANGUAGE, V66, P764, DOI 10.2307/414729 ; Clark Herbert H, 1996, USING LANGUAGE; Cole Peter, 1981, RADICAL PRAGMATICS; Cornulier B., 1978, CAHIERS LINGUISTIQUE, V8, P53; Craig E., 1998, ROUTLEDGE ENCY PHILO; DAVIDSON D, 1984, ESSAYS TRUTH INTEPRE; DUCROT O., 1984, DIRE DIT; GEORGE A, 1989, REFLECTIONS CHOMSKY; GRICE P, 1957, PHILOS REV, V66, P377, DOI DOI 10.2307/2182440; HORN L, 1989, NATL HIST NEGATION; KANGER S, 1981, PHILOS GRAMMAR; Kaplan David, 1989, THEMES KAPLAN, P481; Kaplan David, 1978, SYNTAX SEMANTICS, V9, P221; Lewis David, 1981, PHILOS GRAMMAR, P79; Murasugi Kumiko, 1999, PHILOS LINGUISTICS; Neale Stephen, 1999, PHILOS LINGUISTICS, P35; NUNBERG G, 1993, LINGUIST PHILOS, V16, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF00984721 ; NUNEBRG G, 1990, LINGUISTICS PUNCTUAT; PERRY J, IN PRESS REFERENCE I; Predelli S, 1998, MIND LANG, V13, P400, DOI 10.1111/1468-0017.00083 ; PRIOR A, 1971, OBEJCTS THOUGHT; Quine W. V. O., 1951, MATH LOGIC; READ S, IN PRESS QUOTATION R; RECANATI E, 1998, ROUTLEDGE ENCY PHILO; Recanati F., 1987, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V87, P57; Recanati F., 1993, DIRECT REFERENCE LAN; Recanati F., 2000, ORATIO OBLIQUA ORATI; Recanati Francois, 1979, TRANSPARENCE ENONCIA; Searle JR, 1969, SPEECH ACTS; Searle J. R., 1983, INTENTIONALITY; SPERBER D, 1986, RELEVANCE COMMUNCIAT; Sperber Dan, 2000, METAREPRESENTATIONS; SPERBER DAN-DEIRDRE, 1981, RADICAL PRAGMATICS, P295; Stainton R., 1999, PHILOS LINGUISTICS, P259; TARKSI A, 1956, LOGIC SEMANTICS META; Wierzbicka A., 1974, PAP LINGUIST, V7, P267, DOI DOI 10.1080/08351817409370375; Wilson D., 2000, METAREPRESENTATIONS, P411","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/110.439.637",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","453RH","WOS:000169929900002",,,,,"2018-01-02",48.0,"anscombrejc austinjl bachk barhillely brombergers cappelenh cappelenh carnaprudolf christensenne clarkhh clarkherberth colepeter cornulierb craige davidsond ducroto georgea gricep hornl kangers kaplandavid kaplandavid lewisdavid murasugikumiko nealestephen nunbergg nunebrgg perryj predellis priora quinewvo reads recanatie recanatif recanatif recanatif recanatifrancois searlejr searlejr sperberd sperberdan sperberdandeirdre staintonr tarksia wierzbickaa wilsond almogj","cluster_0"
-0.700775103376249,-0.43017049186359424,27.0,65.0,65.0,0.0,1.0,2008.0,117.0,468.0,843.0,865.0,23.0,"J","Fara, M",,,,"Fara, Michael",,,"Masked Abilities and Compatibilism","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"DISPOSITIONS; CONDITIONALS","An object's disposition to A in circumstances C is masked if circumstances C obtain without the object Aing. This paper explores an analogous sense in which abilities can be masked, and it uses the results of this exploration to motivate an analysis of agents' abilities in terms of dispositions, This analysis is then shown to provide the resources to defend a version of the Principle of Alternate Possibilities against Frankfurt-style counterexamples. Although this principle is often taken to be congenial to incompatibilism concerning free action and determinism, the paper concludes by using the dispositional analysis of abilities to argue for compatibilism, and to show why the master argument' for incompatibilism is unsound.","Princeton Univ, Dept Philosophy, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA","Fara, M (reprint author), Princeton Univ, Dept Philosophy, 212 1879 Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA.","fara@princeton.edu",,,,,"Austin J. L., 1956, P BRIT ACAD, V42, P109; Bird A, 1998, PHILOS QUART, V48, P227, DOI 10.1111/1467-9213.00098 ; CHISHOLM RM, 1967, J PHILOS, V64, P409, DOI 10.2307/2024211 ; Choi S, 2006, SYNTHESE, V148, P369, DOI 10.1007/s11229-004-6229-z; Choi S, 2005, PHILOS QUART, V55, P495, DOI 10.1111/j.0031-8094.2005.00413.x ; Cohen D, 2007, PHILOS STUD, V135, P363, DOI 10.1007/s11098-005-5732-5; Fara M, 2005, NOUS, V39, P43, DOI 10.1111/j.0029-4624.2005.00493.x ; Fischer John Martin, 1994, METAPHYSICS FREE WIL; FRANKFURT H, 1971, J PHILOS, V68, P520; FRANKFURT HG, 1969, J PHILOS, V66, P829, DOI 10.2307/2023833 ; Gundersen L, 2002, SYNTHESE, V130, P389, DOI 10.1023/A:1014845625688 ; JOHNSTON M, 1992, PHILOS STUD, V68, P221, DOI 10.1007/BF00694847 ; Lehrer K, 1968, ANALYSIS, V29, P29, DOI DOI 10.1093/ANALYS/29.1.29; LEWIS D, 1976, AM PHILOS QUART, V13, P145; Lewis D, 1997, PHILOS QUART, V47, P143, DOI 10.1111/1467-9213.00052 ; MARTIN CB, 1994, PHILOS QUART, V44, P1, DOI 10.2307/2220143 ; McKenna M., 1997, J SOCIAL PHILOS, V28, P71; Mele A., 2006, FREE WILL LUCK; Mele AR, 2003, NOUS, V37, P447, DOI 10.1111/1468-0068.00446 ; Mumford S, 1998, DISPOSITIONS; Pereboom Derk, 2001, LIVING FREE WILL; SMITH AD, 1977, MIND, V86, P439; STROUD S, 2003, WEAKNESS WILL VARIET; Taylor R., 1963, METAPHYSICS; van Inwagen P, 1983, ESSAY FREE WILL; van Inwagen Peter, 1980, TIME CAUSE; Vihvelin Kadri, 2004, PHILOS TOPICS, V32, P427, DOI DOI 10.5840/PHILTOPICS2004321/211","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzn078",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","400HP","WOS:000262858900004",,,,,"2018-01-02",49.0,"birda chisholmrm chois chois cohend faram fischerjohnmartin frankfurth frankfurthg gundersenl johnstonm lehrerk lewisd lewisd martincb mckennam melea melear mumfords pereboomderk smithad strouds taylorr vaninwagenp vaninwagenpeter vihvelinkadri austinjl","cluster_3"
-0.06017546241805109,-0.31016256168196227,49.0,65.0,65.0,2.0,9.0,2008.0,117.0,468.0,973.0,1001.0,29.0,"J","Rietveld, E",,,,"Rietveld, Erik",,,"Situated Normativity: The Normative Aspect of Embodied Cognition in Unreflective Action","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"EMOTION","In everyday life we often act adequately, yet without deliberation. For instance, we immediately obtain and maintain an appropriate distance from others in an elevator. The notion of normativity implied here is a very basic one, namely distinguishing adequate from inadequate, correct from incorrect, or better from worse in the context of a particular situation. In the first part of this paper I investigate such 'situated normativity' by focusing on unreflective expert action. More particularly, I use Wittgenstein's examples of craftsmen (tailors and architects) absorbed in action to introduce situated normativity. Situated normativity can be understood as the normative aspect of embodied cognition in unreflective skillful action. I develop Wittgenstein's insight that a peculiar type of affective behaviour, 'directed discontent', is essential for getting things right without reflection. Directed discontent is a reaction of appreciation in action and is introduced as a paradigmatic expression of situated normativity. In the second part I discuss Wittgenstein's ideas on the normativity of what he calls 'blind' rule-following and the 'bedrock' of immediate action. What matters for understanding the normativity of (even 'blind') rule-following, is not that one has the capacity for linguistic articulation or reflection but that one is reliably participating in a communal custom. In the third part I further investigate the complex relationships between unreflective skillful action, perception, emotion, and normativity. Part of this entails an account of the link between normativity at the level of the expert's socio-cultural practice and the individual's situated and lived normativity.","Harvard Univ, Dept Philosophy, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA","Rietveld, E (reprint author), Harvard Univ, Dept Philosophy, Emerson Hall, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA.","rietveld@fas.harvard.edu",,"Rietveld, Erik/0000-0001-5197-142X",,,"Baerveldt C, 2005, THEOR PSYCHOL, V15, P449, DOI 10.1177/0959354305054747; Hacker Peter M. S., 1985, WITTGENSTEIN RULES G; Baldwin TE, 2007, READING MERLEAU PONT; Bennett M. R., 2003, PHILOS FDN NEUROSCIE; Carman T, 2006, CAMBR COMPANION PHIL, P97, DOI 10.1017/CCOL0521821363.004; Colombetti G, 2005, J CONSCIOUSNESS STUD, V12, P103; Damasio A, 1999, FEELING WHAT HAPPENS; DAVIDSON D, 1963, J PHILOS, V60, P685, DOI 10.2307/2023177 ; DELARA P, 2003, PHILOS INVEST, V26, P109; Dreyfus Hubert, 1992, WHAT COMPUTERS STILL; Dreyfus H. L., 2002, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, V1, P367, DOI 10.1023/A:1021351606209; Dreyfus H.L., 2002, PHENOMENOLOGY COGNIT, V1, P413, DOI [DOI 10.1023/A:1021303723047, 10.1023/A:1021303723047]; Dreyfus H. L., 2007, PHENOMENOLOGY COGNIT, V6, P45, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11097-006-9042-Y; Freeman Walter J., 2000, BRAINS MAKE THEIR MI; FRENCH PA, 1993, MIDWEST STUDIES PHIL, V17; Frijda N. H., 2007, LAWS EMOTION; Frijda N. H., 1986, EMOTIONS; Gibson J. J., 1979, ECOLOGICAL APPROACH; Hobson P., 2004, CRADLE THOUGHT EXPLO; KLAASSEN P, 2006, ANTW, V98, P1; KLAGGE JC, 1993, PHILOS OCCASIONS 191; Koffka K., 1935, PRINCIPLES GESTALT P; Kripke Saul Aaron, 1982, WITTGENSTEIN RULES P; Lambie JA, 2002, PSYCHOL REV, V109, P219, DOI 10.1037//0033-295X.109.2.219; Lewin K., 1935, DYNAMIC THEORY PERSO; Luntley M., 2003, WITTGENSTEIN MEANING; MANSTEAD ASR, 2004, FEELINGS EMOTIONS AM; MAREK JC, 2004, EXPERIENCE ANAL PAPE; McDowell J, 1998, MIND VALUE REALITY, P167; Mcdowell J, 2007, INQUIRY, V50, P338, DOI 10.1080/00201740701489211; MELTZOFF AN, 1977, SCIENCE, V198, P75, DOI 10.1126/science.198.4312.75; Merleau-Ponty Maurice, 2002, PHENOMENOLOGY PERCEP; Michaels CF, 2003, ECOL PSYCHOL, V15, P135, DOI 10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_3 ; Moore G. E., 1954, MIND, V63-64, P289; Rietveld E., 2008, ILLC DISSERTATION SE; Rietveld E, 2008, THEOR PSYCHOL, V18, P341, DOI 10.1177/0959354308089789; STEIN HP, 1997, ILLC DISSERTATION SE; Thompson E., 2007, MIND LIFE BIOL PHENO; VANGRUNSVEN J, 2008, INEVITABLE BOD UNPUB; Varela Francisco, 1991, EMBODIED MIND COGNIT; Voestermans P., 2007, CULTUUR LICHAAM CULT; Weiss G., 1999, PERSPECTIVES EMBODIM; Williams Meredith, 1999, WITTGENSTEIN MIND ME; WITTGENSTEIN L, 1966, HIS LECT CONVERSATIO, P1; Wittgenstein Ludwig, 1969, CERTAINTY; Wittgenstein L., 1953, PHILOS INVESTIGATION; Wittgenstein L., 1956, REMARKS FDN MATH; Wittgenstein L, 1980, REMARKS PHILOS PSYCH, VII; Adler JE, 2008, REASONING: STUDIES OF HUMAN INFERENCE AND ITS FOUNDATIONS, P1","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423","1460-2113",,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzn050",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","400HP","WOS:000262858900008",,,,,"2018-01-02",50.0,"hackerpeterms baldwinte bennettmr carmant colombettig damasioa davidsond delarap dreyfushubert dreyfushl dreyfushl dreyfushl freemanwalterj frenchpa frijdanh frijdanh gibsonjj hobsonp klaassenp klaggejc koffkak kripkesaulaaron lambieja lewink luntleym mansteadasr marekjc mcdowellj mcdowellj meltzoffan merleaupontymaurice michaelscf moorege rietvelde rietvelde steinhp thompsone vangrunsvenj varelafrancisco voestermansp weissg williamsmeredith wittgensteinl wittgensteinludwig wittgensteinl wittgensteinl wittgensteinl adlerje baerveldtc","cluster_0"
-0.5674492116111843,-0.480728123487124,25.0,64.0,64.0,0.0,0.0,1997.0,106.0,424.0,641.0,660.0,20.0,"J","Hyde, D",,,,"Hyde, D",,,"From heaps and gaps to heaps of gluts + Vagueness","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"Hyde, D (reprint author), UNIV QUEENSLAND,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,BRISBANE,QLD 4072,AUSTRALIA.",,,,,,"Arruda A. I., 1979, B SECTION LOGIC, V8, P133; Arruda A. I., 1989, PARACONSISTENT LOGIC, P99; CHILDERS T, 1995, LOGICA 94 P 8 INT S; Da Costa N. C. A., 1995, Studia Logica, V54, P33; Da Costa N.C.A., 1980, PHILOS, V9, P189; Dummett M., 1975, SYNTHESE, V30, P301; Fine Kit, 1975, SYNTHESE, V30, P265, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00485047; GOGUEN JA, 1969, SYNTHESE, V19, P325, DOI 10.1007/BF00485654 ; Jaskowski S., 1969, STUDIA LOGICA, V24, P143; LAMBERT K, 1969, LOGICAL WAY DOING TH; LEWIS D, 1982, NOUS, V16, P431, DOI 10.2307/2216219 ; Lewis David, PHILOS PAPERS; Lewis Lewi D., 1970, SYNTHESE, V22, P18, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00413598; MACHINA KF, 1976, J PHILOS LOGIC, V5, P47; McGill V. J., 1948, SCI SOC, V12, P418; MILOSZ C, CAPTIVE MIND; PENA L, 1989, PARACONSISTENT LOGIC, P563; Plekhanov G, 1941, FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEMS; Priest Graham, 1989, PARACONSISTENT LOGIC, P367; Priest G., 1989, PARACONSISTENT LOGIC, P151; van Fraassen B, 1969, LOGICAL WAY DOING TH, P67; VARZI A, 1994, THESIS U TORONTO; Varzi A, 1995, LOGICA 94 P 8 INT S, P17; WILLIAMSON T, VAGUENESS; Zadeh L. A., 1975, SYNTHESE, V30, P407, DOI [10.1007/BF00485052, DOI 10.1007/BF00485052]","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/106.424.641",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","YB287","WOS:A1997YB28700002",,,,,"2018-01-02",51.0,"arrudaai childerst dacostanca dacostanca dummettm finekit goguenja jaskowskis lambertk lewisd lewisdavid lewislewid machinakf mcgillvj miloszc penal plekhanovg priestgraham priestg vanfraassenb varzia varzia williamsont zadehla arrudaai","cluster_3"
-0.8751435834599759,-0.6291267812980006,19.0,63.0,63.0,0.0,0.0,2002.0,111.0,441.0,1.0,13.0,13.0,"J","Lewis, D",,,,"Lewis, D",,,"Tensing the copula","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"A solution to the problem of intrinsic change for enduring things should meet three conditions. It should not replace monadic intrinsic properties by relations. It should not replace the having simpliciter of properties by standing in some relation to them (unless having them simpliciter always means standing in some relation to them, which is refuted by Bradley's regress). It should not rely on an unexplained notion of having an intrinsic property at a time. Johnston's solution satisfies the first condition at the expense of the second. Haslanger's solution satisfies the first and second at the expense of the third.","Princeton Univ, Dept Philosophy, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA","Lewis, D (reprint author), Princeton Univ, Dept Philosophy, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA.",,,,,,"Armstrong DM, 1978, NOMINALISM REALISM; BOOLOS G, 1984, J PHILOS, V81, P430, DOI 10.2307/2026308 ; Bradley F. H., 1897, APPEARANCE REALITY; HASLANGER S, 1989, ANALYSIS, V49, P119, DOI 10.2307/3328113 ; HUMBERSTONE L, 1996, SYNTHESE, V18, P205; JACKSON F, 1994, MONIST, V77, P93, DOI 10.5840/monist19947717 ; JOHNSTON M, 1984, THESIS PRINCETON U; Johnston M., 1987, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V61, P107; Langton R, 1998, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V58, P333, DOI 10.2307/2653512 ; LEWIS D, 1983, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V61, P343, DOI 10.1080/00048408312341131 ; Lewis D., 1993, PHILOS MATH, V3, P3; LEWIS D, 1986, PLURALIITY WORLDS; Lewis D. K., 1983, PHILOS PAPERS; Lewis D.K., 1991, PARTS CLASSES; LOWE EJ, 1988, ANALYSIS, V48, P72, DOI 10.2307/3328772 ; Nolan D, 1996, PHILOS STUD, V84, P239, DOI 10.1007/BF00354489 ; THOMSON JJ, 1983, J PHILOS, V80, P201, DOI 10.2307/2026004 ; VANINWAGEN P, 1998, METPAHYSICS BIG QUES; Zimmerman D., 1998, METAPHYSICS BIG QUES, P206","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/111.441.1",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","528BC","WOS:000174222700002",,,,,"2018-01-02",52.0,"boolosg bradleyfh haslangers humberstonel jacksonf johnstonm johnstonm langtonr lewisd lewisd lewisd lewisdk lewisdk loweej noland thomsonjj vaninwagenp zimmermand armstrongdm","cluster_3"
-0.40764706521383337,-0.2981188755428798,32.0,63.0,64.0,0.0,1.0,1997.0,106.0,423.0,375.0,409.0,35.0,"J","Bezuidenhout, A",,,,"Bezuidenhout, A",,,"Pragmatics, semantic underdetermination and the referential/attributive distinction","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"INDEXICALS",,,"Bezuidenhout, A (reprint author), UNIV S CAROLINA,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,COLUMBIA,SC 29208, USA.",,,,,,"Almog J., 1989, THEMES KAPLAN; Bach K., 1994, MIND LANG, V9, P124, DOI [10.1111/j.1468-0017.1994.tb00220.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1468-0017.1994.TB00220.X]; Bezuidenhout A, 1996, MIND LANG, V11, P133, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0017.1996.tb00038.x ; Bezuidenhout A, 1996, MIND LANG, V11, P427, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0017.1996.tb00055.x ; Bezuidenhout AL, 1997, NOUS, V31, P197, DOI 10.1111/0029-4624.00042 ; Blackburn S., 1975, MEANING REFERENCE NE; Carston R., 1991, PRAGMATICS READER, P33; CRIMMINS M, TALK ABOUT BELIEF; Davis S, 1991, PRAGMATICS READER; DONNELLAN KS, 1968, PHILOS REV, V77, P203, DOI 10.2307/2183321 ; Ehlich Konrad, 1982, SPEECH PLACE ACTION, P315; EVANS G, VARIETIES REFERENCE; Heim I., 1982, THESIS U MASSACHUSET; Kaplan David, 1989, THEMES KAPLAN, P481; KEMPSON R, LANGUAGE COGNITION L; KEMPSON R, 1986, MEANING INTERPRETATI, P209; MARTINICH A. P., 1996, PHILOS LANGUAGE; NEALE S, DESCRIPTIONS; NUNBERG G, 1993, LINGUIST PHILOS, V16, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF00984721 ; NUNBERG G, UNPUB INDEXICALS DES; Peacocke Christopher, 1975, MEANING REFERENCE NE, P109; RECANATI F, DIRECT REFERENCE; ROUCHOTA V, 1992, LINGUA, V87, P137, DOI 10.1016/0024-3841(92)90029-I ; ROUCHOTA V, 1994, J LINGUIST, V30, P441, DOI 10.1017/S0022226700016716 ; SCHIFFER S, 1995, MIND, V104, P107, DOI 10.1093/mind/104.413.107 ; SMITH Q, 1989, SYNTHESE, V78, P167, DOI 10.1007/BF00869371 ; SPERBER D, RELEVANCE COMMUNICAT; SPERBER D, 1995, MAPPING MIND DOMAIN, P39; Strawson P. F, 1996, PHILOS LANGUAGE, P215; TRAVIS C, 1986, MEANING INTERPRETATI; WETTSTEIN HK, 1981, PHILOS STUD, V40, P241, DOI 10.1007/BF00353794 ; WILSON D, 1991, PRAGMATICS READER, P583","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/106.423.375",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","XH166","WOS:A1997XH16600001",,,,,"2018-01-02",53.0,"bachk bezuidenhouta bezuidenhouta bezuidenhoutal blackburns carstonr crimminsm daviss donnellanks ehlichkonrad evansg heimi kaplandavid kempsonr kempsonr martinichap neales nunbergg nunbergg peacockechristopher recanatif rouchotav rouchotav schiffers smithq sperberd sperberd strawsonpf travisc wettsteinhk wilsond almogj","cluster_0"
-0.5009632624917505,-0.30923896722295224,24.0,63.0,66.0,0.0,1.0,1989.0,98.0,391.0,367.0,389.0,23.0,"J","COHEN, LJ",,,,"COHEN, LJ",,,"BELIEF AND ACCEPTANCE","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"COHEN, LJ (reprint author), UNIV OXFORD QUEENS COLL,OXFORD OX1 4AW,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"COHEN LJ, 1983, BEHAVIORAL BRAIN SCI, P248; COHEN LJ, 1950, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, P255; DAVIDSON D, 1982, ESSAYS ACTIONS EVENT, P3; Dennett D., 1979, BRAINSTORMS; DESCARTES R, 1931, PHILOS WORKS, V1, P175; DRETSKE F, 1988, EXPLAINING BEHAVIOR; Einstein A., 1938, EVOLUTION PHYSICS, P224; FODOR J, 1987, PSYCHOSEMANTICS, P1; Hume David, 1888, TREATISE HUMAN NATUR, P183; KANT I, 1907, FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPL, P89; KYBURG HE, 1983, BEHAVIORAL BRAIN SCI, P236; LEHRER K, 1974, KNOWLEDGE, P12; LEVI I, 1984, DECISIONS REVISIONS, P15; MELLOR DH, 1988, WARRANT INDUCTION, P18; MOORE GE, 1912, ETHICS, P125; MORTON A, 1980, FRAMES MIND, P72; RADFORD C, 1966, ANALYSIS, P1; RAMSEY FP, 1981, F MATH, P159; RAPAPORT WJ, 1986, COGNITIVE SCI, V10, P371, DOI 10.1016/S0364-0213(86)80011-8; Stich S., 1983, FOLK PSYCHOL COGNITI; STICH SP, 1983, FOLK PSYCHOL COGNITI, P217; STRAWSON G, 1986, FREEDOM BELIEF, P34; VANFRAASSEN BC, 1980, SCI IMAGE, P8; 1986, DIALOGUE REASON, P91","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","AJ942","WOS:A1989AJ94200003",,,,,"2018-01-02",54.0,"cohenlj davidsond dennettd descartesr dretskef einsteina fodorj humedavid kanti kyburghe lehrerk levii mellordh moorege mortona radfordc ramseyfp rapaportwj stichs stichsp strawsong vanfraassenbc cohenlj","cluster_0"
-0.41673227646041144,-0.2155176485687115,7.0,61.0,61.0,0.0,2.0,1988.0,97.0,387.0,323.0,332.0,10.0,"J","LEWIS, D",,,,"LEWIS, D",,,"DESIRE AS BELIEF","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"LEWIS, D (reprint author), PRINCETON UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,PRINCETON,NJ 08544, USA.",,,,,,"Altham J.E.J., 1986, FACT SCI MORALITY, P284; COLLINS J, 1988, MIND, P333; Jeffrey Richard, 1983, LOGIC DECISION; LEWIS D, 1976, PHILOS REV, V85, P297, DOI 10.2307/2184045 ; SMITH M, 1987, MIND, P36; SMITH M, 1988, MIND, V97; 1986, PHILOS REV, P581","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","P5492","WOS:A1988P549200001",,,,,"2018-01-02",55.0,"collinsj jeffreyrichard lewisd smithm smithm althamjej","cluster_3"
-0.06658807326432711,-0.03871464216243566,12.0,59.0,59.0,0.0,5.0,2006.0,115.0,459.0,607.0,632.0,26.0,"J","Greaves, H; Wallace, D",,,,"Greaves, Hilary; Wallace, David",,,"Justifying conditionalization: Conditionalization maximizes expected epistemic utility","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"According to Bayesian epistemology, the epistemically rational agent updates her beliefs by conditionalization: that is, her posterior subjective probability after taking account of evidence X, p(new), is to be set equal to her prior conditional probability P-old ((.)vertical bar X). Bayesians can be challenged to provide a justification for their claim that conditionalization is recommended by rationality-whence the normative force of the injunction to conditionalize? There are several existing justifications for conditionalization, but none directly addresses the idea that conditionalization will be epistemically rational if and only if it can reasonably be expected to lead to epistemically good outcomes. We apply the approach of cognitive decision theory to provide a justification for conditionalization using precisely that idea. We assign epistemic utility functions to epistemically rational agents; an agent's epistemic utility is to depend both upon the actual state of the world and on the agent's credence distribution over possible states. We prove that, under independently motivated conditions, conditionalization is the unique updating rule that maximizes expected epistemic utility.","Rutgers State Univ, Dept Philosophy, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA; Univ Oxford Balliol Coll, Oxford OX1 3BJ, England","Greaves, H (reprint author), Rutgers State Univ, Dept Philosophy, 26 Nichol Ave, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA.","hgreaves@rci.rutgers.edu; david.wallace@philosophy.ox.ac.uk",,,,,"Good I. J., 1967, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V17, P319; HARPER W, 1976, FDN PROBABILITY STAT; Horwich P., 1982, PROBABILITY EVIDENCE; Lad F., 1996, OPERATIONAL SUBJECTI; Levi Isaac, 1967, GAMBLING TRUTH; Maher Patrick, 1993, BETTING ON THEORIES; Oddie G, 1997, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V48, P533, DOI 10.1093/bjps/48.4.533 ; Savage Leonard, 1954, FDN STAT; SAVAGE LJ, 1971, J AM STAT ASSOC, V66, P783, DOI 10.2307/2284229; Van Fraassen BC, 1999, TOPOI-INT REV PHILOS, V18, P93, DOI 10.1023/A:1006286003463 ; VANFRAASSEN B, 1989, LAWS SYMMETRUY; WILLIAMS PM, 1980, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V31, P131, DOI 10.1093/bjps/31.2.131","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzl607",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","073RX","WOS:000239761400003",,,,,"2018-01-02",56.0,"harperw horwichp ladf leviisaac maherpatrick oddieg savageleonard savagelj vanfraassenbc vanfraassenb williamspm goodij","cluster_0"
-0.9508202391293152,-0.8337537901192918,35.0,59.0,60.0,0.0,1.0,1992.0,101.0,404.0,651.0,688.0,38.0,"J","CUSSINS, A",,,,"CUSSINS, A",,,"CONTENT, EMBODIMENT AND OBJECTIVITY - THE THEORY OF COGNITIVE TRAILS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"CUSSINS, A (reprint author), UNIV CALIF SAN DIEGO,0302,9500 GILMAN DR,LA JOLLA,CA 92093, USA.",,,,,,"Anscombe G. E. M., 1965, ANAL PHILOS; BURGE T, 1977, J PHILOS, V74, P338, DOI 10.2307/2025871 ; Carnap Rudolf, 1967, LOGICAL STRUCTURE WO; Crane T., 1992, CONTENTS EXPERIENCE; CUSSINS A, 1992, REDUCTION EXPLANATIO; CUSSINS A, IN PRESS CONSTRUCTIO; CUSSINS A, 1990, OXFORD READINGS PHIL; DAVIDSON D, 1974, P ADDRESSES AM PHILO, V42, P5; DAVIDSON D, 1989, RELATIVISM INTERPRET; Dretske F., 1981, KNOWLEDGE FLOW INFOR; Dummett M., 1981, FREGE PHILOS LANGUAG; Evans G., 1982, VARIETIES REFERENCE; Evans G., 1985, COLLECTED PAPERS; Fodor J.A., 1981, REPRESENTATIONS; Frege G., 1977, LOGICAL INVESTIGATIO; Frege Gottlob, 1979, POSTHUMOUS WRITINGS; GLOUBERMAN, 1976, LANGUAGE FOCUS, P75; Lakoff G., 1987, WOMEN FIRE DANGEROUS; Latour B., 1987, SCI ACTION; Latour B., 1988, PASTEURIZATION FRANC; Latour B., 1992, SOCIAL DIMENSIONS SC; McDowell J., 1986, SUBJECT THOUGHT CONT; McGinn C., 1982, THOUGHT OBJECT, P207; MILLER GA, 1956, PSYCHOL REV, V63, P81, DOI 10.1037/0033-295X.101.2.343; *PEACOCKE C, 1992, CONTENTS EXPERIENCE; Pettit Phillip, 1986, SUBJECT THOUGHT CONT; Putnam H., 1975, MIND LANGUAGE REALIT, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CB09780511625251, 10.1017/CBO9780511625251]; SMITH B, 1985, CSLI8536 REP; STRAWSON P., 1959, INDIVIDUALS; STRAWSON PF, 1971, LOGICO-LINGUISTIC PA; STRUM S, 1992, JUN C SOC OR THINGS; STRUM S, 1983, PRIMATE PATERNALISM; STRUM SC, 1983, AM J PRIMATOL, V5, P93, DOI 10.1002/ajp.1350050202; Strum S. C., 1987, ALMOST HUMAN; STRUM SS, 1987, SOC SCI INFORM, V26, P783, DOI 10.1177/053901887026004004","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/101.404.651",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","JV063","WOS:A1992JV06300002",,,,,"2018-01-02",57.0,"burget carnaprudolf cranet cussinsa cussinsa cussinsa davidsond davidsond dretskef dummettm evansg evansg fodorja fregeg fregegottlob glouberman lakoffg latourb latourb latourb mcdowellj mcginnc millerga peacockec pettitphillip putnamh smithb strawsonp strawsonpf strums strums strumsc strumsc strumss anscombegem","cluster_0"
-1.1061946521874642,-0.18267933816399295,44.0,59.0,59.0,0.0,0.0,1992.0,101.0,401.0,59.0,83.0,25.0,"J","HUMBERSTONE, IL",,,,"HUMBERSTONE, IL",,,"DIRECTION OF FIT","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"MOTIVATION",,,"HUMBERSTONE, IL (reprint author), MONASH UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,CLAYTON,VIC 3168,AUSTRALIA.",,,"Humberstone, Lloyd/0000-0003-4932-1027",,,"Adams E., 1975, LOGIC CONDITIONALS; Anscombe G. E. M., 1957, INTENTION; Austin J. L., 1953, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V53, P227; Barland G. H., 1973, ELECTRODERMAL ACTIVI, P417; BRAITHWAITE RB, 1947, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V47, pR1; Bratman M, 1987, INTENTION PLANS PRAC; Castaneda H.-N., 1975, THINKING DOING; Dennett D., 1971, J PHILOS, V68, P87, DOI DOI 10.2307/2025382; Fitzgerald P. J., 1962, CRIMINAL LAW PUNISHM; GARSON J, 1971, BASIC ISSUES PHILOS, P145; GOLDMAN AI, 1967, J PHILOS, V64, P357, DOI 10.2307/2024268 ; HARMAN G, 1991, PHILOS PHENOMENOLOGI, V51, P191; HEAL J, 1988, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V88, P97, DOI DOI 10.1093/ARISTOTELIAN/88.1.97; HOULGATE LD, 1966, MIND, V75, P257; HUMBERSTONE IL, 1987, CAN J PHILOS, V17, P49; HUMBERSTONE IL, 1982, PHILOSOPHIA, V12, P99, DOI 10.1007/BF02379362 ; James Frances, 1986, SEMANTICS ENGLISH SU; JAMES W, 1891, WILL TO BELIEVE; Kenny Anthony, 1966, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V66, P93; Kripke Saul Aaron, 1982, WITTGENSTEIN RULES P; Lewis D., 1974, LOGICAL THEORY SEMAN, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-010-2191-3_1; Loar B., 1981, MIND MEANING; MAYO B, 1967, KNOWLEDGE BELIEFS, P147; Millikan R. G., 1984, LANGUAGE THOUGHT OTH; Parfit D., 1984, REASONS PERSONS; Peacocke Ch., 1983, SENSE AND CONTENT; PETTIT P, 1987, MIND, V96, P530; Platts M., 1979, WAYS MEANING; PRICE H, 1989, MIND, V98, P119; Searle J., 1979, EXPRESSION MEANING; Searle J. R., 1983, INTENTIONALITY; SMITH M, 1987, MIND, V96, P36; Smith M., 1988, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V88, P243; SOBER E, 1985, SYNTHESE, V64, P165, DOI 10.1007/BF00486037 ; Sorensen R. A., 1988, BLINDSPOTS; Stalnaker Robert C., 1984, INQUIRY; STICH S, 1990, FRAGMENTATION REASON; UNGER P, 1968, J PHILOS, V65, P157, DOI 10.2307/2024203 ; URMSON JO, 1967, MIND, V76, P83; VELLEMAN JD, 1992, IN PRESS NOUS, V26; Williams B., 1970, PROBLEMS SELF, P136; WILLIAMS B, 1973, PROBLEMS SELF; WILLIAMS BAO, 1966, PROBLEMS SELF, P187; WILLIAMS JN, 1979, ANALYSIS, V39, P141, DOI 10.2307/3327254","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/101.401.59",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","HA983","WOS:A1992HA98300004",,,,,"2018-01-02",58.0,"anscombegem austinjl barlandgh braithwaiterb bratmanm castanedahn dennettd fitzgeraldpj garsonj goldmanai harmang healj houlgateld humberstoneil humberstoneil jamesfrances jamesw kennyanthony kripkesaulaaron lewisd loarb mayob millikanrg parfitd peacockech pettitp plattsm priceh searlej searlejr smithm smithm sobere sorensenra stalnakerrobertc stichs ungerp urmsonjo vellemanjd williamsb williamsb williamsbao williamsjn adamse","cluster_6"
-0.7460667190349474,-0.48592953801127153,75.0,58.0,58.0,0.0,3.0,2009.0,118.0,469.0,31.0,70.0,40.0,"J","Gluer, K; Wikforss, A",,,,"Gluer, Kathrin; Wikforss, Asa",,,"Against Content Normativity","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"BELIEF; RULES; TRUTH; ANALYTICITY; IMPLICIT; BRANDOM; NORM; AIM","As meaning's claim to normativity has grown increasingly suspect the normativity thesis has shifted to mental content. In this paper, we distinguish two versions of content normativism: 'CE normativism,' according to which it is essential to content that certain 'oughts' can be derived from it, and 'CD normativism', according to which content is determined by norms in the first place. We argue that neither type of normativism withstands scrutiny. CE normativism appeals to the fact that there is an essential connection between content and correctness conditions. But, we argue, this fact is by itself normatively innocent, and attempts to add a normative dimension via the normativity of belief ultimately fail. CD normativism, in turn, falls prey to the 'dilemma of regress and idleness': the appeal to rules either leads to some form of regress of rules, or the notion of rule-following is reduced to an idle label. We Conclude by suggesting that our arguments do not Support naturalism: it is a mistake to assume that normativism and naturalism are our only options.","[Gluer, Kathrin; Wikforss, Asa] Univ Stockholm, Dept Philosophy, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden","Gluer, K (reprint author), Univ Stockholm, Dept Philosophy, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden.",,,,,,"ALSTON W, 1986, MONIST, V68, P57; Baker G. P., 1985, ANAL COMMENTARY PHIL, V2; BALTZER U, 2002, I REGELFOLGEN; Baron-Cohen S., 1993, UNDERSTANDING OTHER; Bilgrami Akeel, 1993, REFLECTING DAVIDSON, P121; BLACKBURN S, 1984, SYNTHESE, V58, P281, DOI 10.1007/BF00485244 ; Boghossian P., 2003, PHILOS ISSUES, V13, P31, DOI DOI 10.1111/1533-6077.00003; Boghossian PA, 2005, PHILOS STUD, V124, P185, DOI 10.1007/s11098-004-4916-8; BOGHOSSIAN PA, 1989, MIND, V98, P507; BOGHOSSIAN PA, 1996, NOUS, V30, P360, DOI 10.2307/2216275 ; Boghossian PA, 2008, J PHILOS, V105, P472, DOI 10.5840/jphil2008105929 ; Brandom R., 1994, MAKING IT EXPLICIT; BROOME J, 2004, REASONING WEDBERG LE; CARROLL L, 1995, MIND, V104, P691, DOI 10.1093/mind/104.416.691 ; Davidson D., 2001, INTERPRETING DAVIDSO, P285; Davidson D., 2001, SUBJECTIVE INTERSUBJ; DRETSKE F, 2000, PERCEPTION KNOWLEDGE, P242; Engel P, 2000, PHILOS STUD, V100, P305, DOI 10.1023/A:1018680726427 ; ENGEL P, 2001, INTERPRETING DAVIDSO, P37; Feldman Richard, 2001, KNOWLEDGE TRUTH DUTY, P77; Fodor J., 1990, THEORY CONTENT; FREGE Gottlob, 1986, LOGISCHE UNTERSUCHUN; FRENCH P, 1992, MIDWEST STUDIES PHIL; Fumerton R., 2001, KNOWLEDGE TRUTH DUTY, P49, DOI 10.1093/0195128923.001.0001; Gibbard Allan, 2003, PHILOS ISSUES, V13, P83, DOI DOI 10.1111/1533-6077.00006; Gluer K, 2000, DEUT Z PHILOS, V48, P449; Gluer K, 2003, GRAZ PHIL S, V66, P37; GLUER K, 2007, THESIS; Gluer K., 2001, INTERPRETING DAVIDSO, P53; Gluer K., 1999, SYNTHESE, V117, P207; Gluer K., 1999, SPRACHE REGELN NORMA; Gluer K., 2002, INSTITUTIONEN REGELF, P157; GLUER K, 2008, ES BRAUCHT IN PRESS; GLUER K., 1999, ACTA ANAL, V14, P111; GREEN, NORMS SPEEC IN PRESS; Hattiangadi A, 2006, MIND LANG, V21, P220, DOI 10.1111/j.0268-1064.2006.00312.x ; Hattiangadi A, 2003, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V66, P419, DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00269.x ; HATTIANGADI A, 2007, OUGHTS THOUGHTS SCEP; HORWICH P, 1995, MIND, V104, P355, DOI 10.1093/mind/104.414.355 ; Horwich P., 1998, MEANING; HUSSERL E, 1913, PROLEGOMENA REINEN L, V1; Kolodny N, 2005, MIND, V114, P509, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzi223; Korsgaard C. M., 1996, SOURCES NORMATIVITY; Kotatko Petr, 2001, INTERPRETING DAVIDSO; Kripke Saul Aaron, 1982, WITTGENSTEIN RULES P; MCDOWELL J, 1984, SYNTHESE, V58, P325, DOI 10.1007/BF00485246 ; McDowell John, 1992, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V17, P40; Noordhof P., 2001, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V101, P247; Owens DJ, 2003, PHILOS STUD, V115, P283, DOI 10.1023/A:1025157101089 ; PAGIN P, 2008, NORMS SPEEC IN PRESS; PETTIT P, 1986, EDITORIAL INTRO SUBJ; Platts M., 1979, WAYS MEANING; Rosen G, 2001, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V63, P611, DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2001.tb00128.x; Rosen G, 1997, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V57, P163, DOI 10.2307/2953786 ; Searle John R., 1995, CONSTRUCTION SOCIAL; Searle JR, 1969, SPEECH ACTS; Sellars W., 1963, SCI PERCEPTION REALI; Shah N, 2003, PHILOS REV, V112, P447, DOI 10.1215/00318108-112-4-447 ; Shah N, 2005, PHILOS REV, V114, P497, DOI 10.1215/00318108-114-4-497 ; Steglich-Petersen A, 2006, PHILOS QUART, V56, P499, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2006.455.x ; STEUP M., 2001, KNOWLEDGE TRUTH DUTY; Stoecker Ralf, 1993, REFLECTING DAVIDSON; Velleman D. J., 2000, POSSIBILITY PRACTICA; Wedgwood R, 1999, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V59, P113, DOI 10.2307/2653460 ; Wedgwood R., 2002, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V16, P276; Weiner M, 2005, PHILOS REV, V114, P227, DOI 10.1215/00318108-114-2-227 ; WELLMAN HM, 1993, UNDERSTANDING OTHER, P10; WHITING D, LATER WITTG IN PRESS; Whiting D, 2007, ANALYSIS, V67, P133, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8284.2007.00663.x ; Wikforss AM, 2001, PHILOS STUD, V102, P203, DOI 10.1023/A:1004746319850 ; Williams B., 1973, PROBLEMS SELF, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511621253; Williamson T., 2000, KNOWLEDGE ITS LIMITS; Wittgenstein L., 1952, PHILOS INVESTIGATION; WRIGHT C, 1984, J PHILOS, V81, P759, DOI 10.2307/2026031 ; Zangwill N, 1998, PHILOS STUD, V91, P173, DOI 10.1023/A:1004252526870","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423","1460-2113",,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzn154",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","442IU","WOS:000265835700002",,,,,"2018-01-02",59.0,"bakergp baltzeru baroncohens bilgramiakeel blackburns boghossianp boghossianpa boghossianpa boghossianpa boghossianpa brandomr broomej carrolll davidsond davidsond dretskef engelp engelp feldmanrichard fodorj fregegottlob frenchp fumertonr gibbardallan gluerk gluerk gluerk gluerk gluerk gluerk gluerk gluerk gluerk green hattiangadia hattiangadia hattiangadia horwichp horwichp husserle kolodnyn korsgaardcm kotatkopetr kripkesaulaaron mcdowellj mcdowelljohn noordhofp owensdj paginp pettitp plattsm roseng roseng searlejohnr searlejr sellarsw shahn shahn steglichpetersena steupm stoeckerralf vellemandj wedgwoodr wedgwoodr weinerm wellmanhm whitingd whitingd wikforssam williamsb williamsont wittgensteinl wrightc zangwilln alstonw","cluster_0"
0.04738523312814745,-0.05720275008219845,10.0,58.0,58.0,0.0,11.0,1990.0,99.0,393.0,53.0,65.0,13.0,"J","FRENCH, RM",,,,"FRENCH, RM",,,"SUBCOGNITION AND THE LIMITS OF THE TURING TEST","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"FRENCH, RM (reprint author), INDIANA UNIV,CTR RES CONCEPTS & COGNIT,BLOOMINGTON,IN 47405, USA.",,,,,,"ANDERSON JR, 1983, ARCHITECTURE COGNITI, P86; Dennett Daniel, 1985, WE KNOW; DREYFUS HL, 1979, WHAT COMPUTERS CANT, P73; FELDMAN J, 1982, COGNITIVE SCI JUL, P205; HOFSTADTER DR, 1987, CSMIL10 U MICH TECHN; HOFSTADTER DR, 1985, METAMAGICAL THEMAS, P526; Lakoff G., 1987, WOMEN FIRE DANGEROUS; MEYER DE, 1971, J EXP PSYCHOL, V90, P227, DOI 10.1037/h0031564 ; Rumelhart D., 1986, PARALLEL DISTRIBUTED; Wittgenstein L., 1958, PHILOS INVESTIGATION","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","CL170","WOS:A1990CL17000004",,,,,"2018-01-02",60.0,"dennettdaniel dreyfushl feldmanj hofstadterdr hofstadterdr lakoffg meyerde rumelhartd wittgensteinl andersonjr","cluster_0"
-0.04020510901954811,0.006807339168791522,5.0,57.0,57.0,0.0,0.0,1988.0,97.0,388.0,575.0,582.0,8.0,"J","BAXTER, DLM",,,,"BAXTER, DLM",,,"IDENTITY IN THE LOOSE AND POPULAR SENSE","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"BAXTER, DLM (reprint author), PRINCETON UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,1879 HALL,PRINCETON,NJ 08544, USA.",,,,,,"BUTLER J, 1849, ANALOGY RELIG, P305; CHISHOLM RM, 1973, REV METAPHYSICS, P595; FREGE G, 1953, F ARITHMETIC, P59; *INT REV SERV, 1984, PUBL 17, P81; LOCKE J, 1894, ESSAY HUMAN UNDERSTA, V1, P460","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","R0956","WOS:A1988R095600004",,,,,"2018-01-02",61.0,"chisholmrm fregeg intrevserv lockej butlerj","cluster_0"
-0.44474615282536445,-0.31598980803595217,10.0,56.0,56.0,0.0,0.0,1995.0,104.0,415.0,523.0,531.0,9.0,"J","MERRICKS, T",,,,"MERRICKS, T",,,"ON THE INCOMPATIBILITY OF ENDURING AND PERDURING ENTITIES","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"MERRICKS, T (reprint author), VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,RICHMOND,VA 23284, USA.",,,,,,"CARTER WR, 1994, AM PHILOS QUART, V31, P269; HASLANGER S, 1989, ANALYSIS, V49, P119, DOI 10.2307/3328113 ; HELLER M, 1990, ONTOLOGY PHYSICAL OB; Jubien Michael, 1993, ONTOLOGY MODALITY FA; Lewis D., 1986, PLURALITY WORLDS; Lombard L., 1986, EVENTS METAPHYSICAL; MERRICKS T, 1994, J PHILOS, V91, P165, DOI 10.2307/2940769 ; MERRICKS T, 1990, MATERIAL BEINGS; Whitehead AlfredNorth, 1920, CONCEPT NATURE; Wiggins D., 1980, SAMENESS SUBSTANCE","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","RJ564","WOS:A1995RJ56400004",,,,,"2018-01-02",62.0,"haslangers hellerm jubienmichael lewisd lombardl merrickst merrickst whiteheadalfrednorth wigginsd carterwr","cluster_3"
-0.2363665116386697,0.0021694204553282435,12.0,56.0,56.0,0.0,0.0,1991.0,100.0,397.0,87.0,116.0,30.0,"J","WRIGHT, C",,,,"WRIGHT, C",,,"SKEPTICISM AND DREAMING - IMPLODING THE DEMON","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"UNIV MICHIGAN,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,ANN ARBOR,MI 48109","WRIGHT, C (reprint author), UNIV ST ANDREWS,DEPT LOGIC & METAPHYSICS,ST ANDREWS KY16 9AL,FIFE,SCOTLAND.",,,,,,"Dancy J., 1985, INTRO CONT EPISTEMOL; DESCARTES R, MEDITATIONS; DRETSKE FI, 1970, J PHILOS, V67, P1007, DOI 10.2307/2024710 ; NOZICK R, 1981, PHILOS EXPLANATIONS; PEACOCKE C, 1987, P BRIT ACADEMY, V63; Pollock J., 1986, CONT THEORIES KNOWLE; Russell Bertrand, 1912, PROBLEMS PHILOS; Strawson P. F., 1985, SKEPTICISM NATURALIS; STROUD B., 1984, SIGNIFICANCE PHILOS; Williams M, 1991, UNNATURAL DOUBTS EPI; Wittgenstein Ludwig, 1969, CERTAINTY; Wright Crispin, 1985, P BRIT ACAD, VLXXI, P429","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","EW928","WOS:A1991EW92800006",,,,,"2018-01-02",63.0,"descartesr dretskefi nozickr peacockec pollockj russellbertrand strawsonpf stroudb williamsm wittgensteinludwig wrightcrispin dancyj","cluster_0"
-0.2805033987212474,0.21528418906644572,14.0,56.0,56.0,0.0,0.0,1983.0,92.0,368.0,530.0,547.0,18.0,"J","DANCY, J",,,,"DANCY, J",,,"ETHICAL PARTICULARISM AND MORALLY RELEVANT PROPERTIES","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"DANCY, J (reprint author), UNIV KEELE,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,KEELE ST5 5BG,STAFFS,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"Broad C. D., 1930, 5 TYPES ETHICAL THEO; CARRITT EF, 1928, THEORY MORALS; DANCY J, 1981, MIND, V90, P367; Frankena W, 1963, ETHICS; HARE R. M., 1952, LANGUAGE MORALS; McDowell, 1981, WITTGENSTEIN FOLLOW, P141; MCDOWELL J, 1979, MONIST, V62; Prichard H., 1949, MORAL OBLIGATION; Rashdall Hastings, 1907, THEORY GOOD EVIL; ROSS WD, 1939, F ETHICS; Ross W. D., 1930, RIGHT GOOD; Sidgwick H, 1874, METHODS ETHICS; Wiggins D, 1978, PRACTICAL REASONING; WITTGENSTEIN L, 1968, ON CERTAINTY","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","RL245","WOS:A1983RL24500004",,,,,"2018-01-02",64.0,"carrittef dancyj frankenaw harerm mcdowell mcdowellj prichardh rashdallhastings rosswd rosswd sidgwickh wigginsd wittgensteinl broadcd","cluster_6"
-0.24613945664060824,0.04947772375524171,41.0,55.0,55.0,0.0,5.0,1986.0,95.0,379.0,279.0,309.0,31.0,"J","CHURCHLAND, PM",,,,"CHURCHLAND, PM",,,"SOME REDUCTIVE STRATEGIES IN COGNITIVE NEUROBIOLOGY","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"CHURCHLAND, PM (reprint author), UNIV CALIF SAN DIEGO,LA JOLLA,CA 92093, USA.",,"Galantucci, Bruno/E-5770-2010",,,,"ALLMAN JM, 1982, CORTICAL SENSORY ORG, V2; ARBIB MA, 1985, J THEOR BIOL, V112, P123, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5193(85)80120-X ; BALLARD DH, 1986, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V9, P67, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X00021555 ; BARTOSHUK LM, 1978, HDB BEHAVIORAL NEURO, V1, P503; Churchland P., 1979, SCI REALISM PLASTICI; CHURCHLAND P M, 1986, Biology and Philosophy, V1, P25, DOI 10.1007/BF00127088; CHURCHLAND PM, 1985, J PHILOS, V82, P8, DOI 10.2307/2026509 ; Churchland P.S., 1986, NEUROPHILOSOPHY UNIF; CYNADER M, 1972, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V35, P187; DENNETT DC, 1975, MINNESOTA STUDIES PH, V7, P403; Goldberg ME, 1978, HDB BEHAVIORAL NEURO, V1, P119; GORDON B, 1973, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V36, P157; HUERTA MF, 1984, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V7, P286, DOI 10.1016/S0166-2236(84)80197-6 ; JACKSON F, 1982, PHILOS QUART, V32, P127, DOI 10.2307/2960077 ; KANASEKI T, 1974, J COMP NEUROL, V158, P319, DOI 10.1002/cne.901580307 ; KONISHI M, 1986, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V9, P163, DOI 10.1016/0166-2236(86)90053-6 ; LAND EH, 1977, SCI AM, P108; LLINAS RR, 1975, SCI AM, V232, P56, DOI 10.1038/scientificamerican0175-56 ; LLINAS RR, 1986, MIND MATTER; LYCAN WG, 1985, BELIEF; MAYS LE, 1980, SCIENCE, V208, P1163, DOI 10.1126/science.6769161; MCILWAIN JT, 1975, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V38, P219; MCILWAIN JT, 1984, ABSTR SOC NEUR 1, V10, P268; MEREDITH MA, 1985, SCIENCE, V227, P657, DOI 10.1126/science.3969558 ; Merzenich M.M., 1980, PROGR PSYCHOBIOL PHY, V9, P1; MOONEY RD, 1984, ABSTR SOC NEUR 1, V10, P158; NAGEL T, 1974, PHILOS REV, V83, P435, DOI 10.2307/2183914 ; PELLIONISZ A, 1979, NEUROSCIENCE, V4, P323, DOI 10.1016/0306-4522(79)90097-6; PELLIONISZ A, 1982, NEUROSCIENCE, V7, P2949, DOI 10.1016/0306-4522(82)90224-X ; PELLIONISZ A, 1985, UNPUB NEUROSCIENCE, P1; PELLIONISZ A, 1984, UNPUB REV OCULOMOTOR; Pfaff D. W., 1985, TASTE OLFACTION CENT; RISSET JC, 1982, PSYCHOL MUSIC; ROBINSON DA, 1972, VISION RES, V12, P1795, DOI 10.1016/0042-6989(72)90070-3; Robinson H., 1982, MATTER SENSE; SCHILLER PH, 1983, EXP BRAIN RES, V49, P381; SCHILLER PH, 1972, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V35, P915; Schiller PH, 1984, HDB PHYSL 1, VIII, P457; SMITH DV, 1983, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V50, P541; STEIN BE, 1984, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V7, P95, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ne.07.030184.000523 ; ZEKI S, 1983, NEUROSCIENCE, V9, P741, DOI 10.1016/0306-4522(83)90265-8","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","D3824","WOS:A1986D382400001",,,,,"2018-01-02",65.0,"arbibma ballarddh bartoshuklm churchlandp churchlandpm churchlandpm churchlandps cynaderm dennettdc goldbergme gordonb huertamf jacksonf kanasekit konishim landeh llinasrr llinasrr lycanwg maysle mcilwainjt mcilwainjt meredithma merzenichmm mooneyrd nagelt pellionisza pellionisza pellionisza pellionisza pfaffdw rissetjc robinsonda robinsonh schillerph schillerph schillerph smithdv steinbe zekis allmanjm","cluster_6"
-0.454222820252773,-0.31690352912810765,9.0,55.0,56.0,0.0,1.0,1985.0,94.0,376.0,557.0,568.0,12.0,"J","EDGINGTON, D",,,,"EDGINGTON, D",,,"THE PARADOX OF KNOWABILITY","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"EDGINGTON, D (reprint author), UNIV LONDON BIRKBECK COLL,LONDON WC1E 7HX,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"CROSSLEY J, 1977, REPORTS MATH LOGIC; FITCH FB, 1955, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC; HART WD, 1979, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, P164; HUMBERTSTONE IL, 1981, J PHILOS LOGIC; KRIPKE SA, 1980, NAMING NECESSITY NAT; Lewis D., 1973, COUNTERFACTUALS; Lewis D. K., 1983, PHILOS PAPERS; MACKIE JL, 1980, ANALYSIS; Putnam Hilary, 1978, MEANING MORAL SCI","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","ATR40","WOS:A1985ATR4000005",,,,,"2018-01-02",66.0,"fitchfb hartwd humbertstoneil kripkesa lewisd lewisdk mackiejl putnamhilary crossleyj","cluster_3"
-0.4356266543437128,-0.36881693234734825,8.0,54.0,54.0,0.0,1.0,1994.0,103.0,412.0,505.0,517.0,13.0,"J","HALL, N",,,,"HALL, N",,,"CORRECTING THE GUIDE TO OBJECTIVE CHANCE","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"HALL, N (reprint author), MIT,DEPT LINGUIST & PHILOSOPHY,CAMBRIDGE,MA 02139, USA.",,,,,,"BAS V, 1989, LAWS SYMMETRY; GAIFMAN H, 1988, CAUSALITY CHANCE CHO; LEWIS D, 1994, MIND, V103, P473, DOI 10.1093/mind/103.412.473 ; Lewis D., 1986, STUDIES INDUCTIVE LO, VII, P83; LEWIS D., 1986, PHILOS PAPERS, VII; Mellor D. H., 1971, MATTER CHANCE; Skyrms B., 1980, CAUSAL NECESSITY; THAU M, 1994, MIND, V103, P491, DOI 10.1093/mind/103.412.491","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/103.412.505",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","PM104","WOS:A1994PM10400007",,,,,"2018-01-02",67.0,"gaifmanh lewisd lewisd lewisd mellordh skyrmsb thaum basv","cluster_3"
0.024539255678817692,0.03498269043548924,2.0,54.0,54.0,0.0,0.0,1957.0,66.0,263.0,385.0,389.0,5.0,"J","RUSSELL, B",,,,"RUSSELL, B",,,"STRAWSON ON REFERRING - DISCUSSION","MIND",,,"English","Discussion",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"STRAWSON, INQUIRY MEANING TRUT, pCH7; STRAWSON, HUMAN KNOWLEDGE 2, pCH4","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","CCP43","WOS:A1957CCP4300008",,,,,"2018-01-02",68.0,"strawson strawson","cluster_4"
-0.45208517197078746,-0.630494595088505,80.0,53.0,53.0,2.0,10.0,2009.0,118.0,472.0,963.0,993.0,31.0,"J","Clark, A",,,,"Clark, Andy",,,"Spreading the Joy? Why the Machinery of Consciousness is (Probably) Still in the Head","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"NEURONAL SYNCHRONY; EXTENDED MIND; AREA MT; PSYCHOLOGY; EMBODIMENT; COGNITION","Is consciousness all in the head, or might the minimal physical substrate for some forms of conscious experience include the goings on in the (rest of the) body and the world? Such a view might be dubbed (by analogy with Clark and Chalmers's (1998) claims concerning 'the extended mind') 'the extended conscious mind'. In this article, I review a variety of arguments for the extended conscious mind, and find them flawed. Arguments for extended cognition, I conclude, do not generalize to arguments for an extended conscious mind.","Univ Edinburgh, Sch Philosophy Psychol & Language Sci, Dept Philosophy, Edinburgh EH8 9AD, Midlothian, Scotland","Clark, A (reprint author), Univ Edinburgh, Sch Philosophy Psychol & Language Sci, Dept Philosophy, Edinburgh EH8 9AD, Midlothian, Scotland.","andy.clark@ed.ac.uk",,,,,"Adams F., 2008, BOUNDS COGNITION; Arbib M., 2003, HDB BRAIN THEORY NEU; Aydede M., 2008, CAMBRIDGE HDB SITUAT; Bach-y-Rita P, 2003, TRENDS COGN SCI, V7, P541, DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.013; BALLARD DH, 1991, ARTIF INTELL, V48, P57, DOI 10.1016/0004-3702(91)90080-4; Ballard DH, 1997, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V20, P723; Block N, 2005, J PHILOS, V102, P259, DOI 10.5840/jphil2005102524 ; BLOCK N, 1986, J PHILOS, V83, P148; Block N, 2007, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V30, P481, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X07002786; BURGE T, 1986, PHILOS REV, V95, P3, DOI 10.2307/2185131 ; Chalmers D., 2008, FOREWORD CLARK 2008, pix; Chalmers David, 1995, CONSCIOUS MIND; Chalmers D, 2002, PHILOS MIND CLASSICA; Clark A, 1998, ANALYSIS, V58, P7, DOI 10.1111/1467-8284.00096; Clark A, 2002, J CONSCIOUSNESS STUD, V9, P181; Clark A., 1999, J CONSCIOUSNESS STUD, V6, P1; Clark A., 2001, MINDWARE INTRO PHILO; Clark A., 2008, SUPERSIZING MIND EMB; Clark A, 2007, J PHILOS, V104, P163, DOI 10.5840/jphil2007104426 ; Clark A, 1997, COGNITIVE SCI, V21, P461, DOI 10.1207/s15516709cog2104_3; Dennett Daniel, 1981, BRAINSTORMS; Dennett D., 1996, KINDS OF MINDS; Dennett Daniel, 1991, CONSCIOUSNESS EXPLAI; Dennett D. C., 1969, CONTENT CONSCIOUSNES; Dretske F., 1981, KNOWLEDGE FLOW INFOR; Fodor J. A., 1998, CRITICAL CONDITION P; French Peter A., 1979, MIDWEST STUDIES PHIL, V4; Gendler Tamar Szabo, 2006, PERCEPTUAL EXPERIENC; Goldin-Meadow S., 2003, HEARING GESTURE OUR; GRAU C, 2005, PHILOSOPHERS EXPLORE; GRIM P, 1998, PHILOS ANN, V21, P59; Gunderson Keith, 1975, LANGUAGE MIND KNOWLE; HAAPARANTA L, 1995, ACTA PHILOS FENN, V58, P1; Hardcastle VG, 1998, PHILOS PSYCHOL, V11, P331, DOI 10.1080/09515089808573265 ; Haugeland J., 1998, HAVING THOUGHT ESSAY; Hawthorne J., 2008, PHILOS MIND; Hurley S, 2003, BIOL PHILOS, V18, P131, DOI 10.1023/A:1023308401356; Hurley S.L., 1998, CONSCIOUSNESS ACTION; Hutchins E, 2005, J PRAGMATICS, V37, P1555, DOI 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.06.008; Hutchins E, 1995, COGNITION WILD; Kelso J.A.S., 1995, DYNAMIC PATTERNS; KELSO JAS, 2002, NONLINEAR PHENOMENA, V5, P364; Koch C., 1994, LARGE SCALE NEURONAL; Lamme VAF, 1998, NATURE, V396, P362, DOI 10.1038/24608 ; Lamme VAF, 2006, TRENDS COGN SCI, V10, P494, DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.001; LUNGARELLA M, 2005, P 4 INT C DEV LEARN, P25, DOI DOI 10.1109/DEVLRN.2005.1490938; Marcar VL, 1997, NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, V35, P1459, DOI 10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00057-2 ; Martin MGF, 2004, PHILOS STUD, V120, P37, DOI 10.1023/B:PHIL.0000033751.66949.97 ; Martin MGF, 2002, MIND LANG, V17, P376, DOI 10.1111/1468-0017.00205 ; MCGINN C, 1991, MYSTERIOUS FLAME CON; McNeill D., 2005, GESTURE THOUGHT; Menary R, 2007, NEW DIR PHILOS COGN, P1, DOI 10.1057/9780230592889; Menary R., EXTENDED MI IN PRESS; MILLAR A, 2007, PHILOS PHENOMENOLOGI, V79, P176; Millikan R. G., 1984, LANGUAGE THOUGHT OTH; Noe A, 2004, J CONSCIOUSNESS STUD, V11, P87; Noe A, 2004, J CONSCIOUSNESS STUD, V11, P3; Noe A., 2002, IS VISUAL WORLD GRAN; Noe Alva, 2004, ACTION PERCEPTION; OREGAN JK, 1992, CAN J PSYCHOL, V46, P461, DOI 10.1037/h0084327; O'Regan J. K., 2001, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V24, P883, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0140525X01000115; Port R.F., 1995, MIND MOTION EXPLORAT; Putnam H., 1979, MIND LANGUAGE REALIT, V2; RENFREW C, COGNITIVE L IN PRESS; Bach-y P. Rita, 1972, BRAIN MECH SENSORY S; Robbins P., 2009, CAMBRIDGE HDB SITUAT; Rowlands M., 2003, EXTERNALISM PUTTING; Rowlands M, 2006, BODY LANGUAGE REPRES; Serruya MD, 2002, NATURE, V416, P141, DOI 10.1038/416141a ; Smith ML, 2007, NEUROIMAGE, V37, P974, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.05.030; SMITH P, 1984, CAN J PHILOS, V14, P115, DOI 10.1080/00455091.1984.10716372 ; STAFFORD T, 2005, MIND HACKS; STEWART J, ENACTION NE IN PRESS; Thiele A, 2003, NATURE, V421, P366, DOI 10.1038/nature01285; Thompson E, 2001, TRENDS COGN SCI, V5, P418, DOI 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01750-2 ; Tofts D., 2002, PREFIGURING CYBERCUL; Tribble E, 2005, SHAKESPEARE QUART, V56, P135; VARELA F., 1991, EMBODIED MIND; Wheeler M., 2005, RECONSTRUCTING COGNI; Wilson R., 2004, BOUNDARIES MIND INDI","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzp110",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","568WY","WOS:000275557900003",,,,,"2018-01-02",69.0,"arbibm aydedem bachyritap ballarddh ballarddh blockn blockn blockn burget chalmersd chalmersdavid chalmersd clarka clarka clarka clarka clarka clarka clarka dennettdaniel dennettd dennettdaniel dennettdc dretskef fodorja frenchpetera gendlertamarszabo goldinmeadows grauc grimp gundersonkeith haaparantal hardcastlevg haugelandj hawthornej hurleys hurleysl hutchinse hutchinse kelsojas kelsojas kochc lammevaf lammevaf lungarellam marcarvl martinmgf martinmgf mcginnc mcneilld menaryr menaryr millara millikanrg noea noea noea noealva oreganjk oreganjk portrf putnamh renfrewc bachyprita robbinsp rowlandsm rowlandsm serruyamd smithml smithp staffordt stewartj thielea thompsone toftsd tribblee varelaf wheelerm wilsonr adamsf","cluster_0"
-0.8247474491443676,-0.7114192081304127,33.0,53.0,53.0,0.0,1.0,2008.0,117.0,465.0,59.0,84.0,26.0,"J","Manley, D; Wasserman, R",,,,"Manley, David; Wasserman, Ryan",,,"On linking dispositions and conditionals","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"Analyses of dispositional ascriptions in terms of conditional statements famously confront the problems of finks and masks. We argue that conditional analyses of dispositions, even those tailored to avoid finks and masks, face five further problems. These are the problems of. (i) Achilles' heels, (ii) accidental closeness, (iii) comparatives, (iv) explaining context sensitivity, and (v) absent stimulus conditions. We conclude by offering a proposal that avoids all seven of these problems.","[Manley, David] Univ So Calif, Sch Philosophy, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA; [Wasserman, Ryan] Western Washington Univ, Dept Philosophy, Bellingham, WA 98225 USA","Manley, D (reprint author), Univ So Calif, Sch Philosophy, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA.","dmanley8@gmail.com; ryan.wasserman@wwu.edu",,,,,"Bird A, 1998, PHILOS QUART, V48, P227, DOI 10.1111/1467-9213.00098 ; CRESSWELL MJ, 1977, PARTEE, V261, P92; Fara M, 2005, NOUS, V39, P43, DOI 10.1111/j.0029-4624.2005.00493.x ; FODOR JD, 1982, LINGUIST PHILOS, V5, P355, DOI 10.1007/BF00351459 ; Goodman Nelson, 1954, FACT FICTION FORECAS; Hawthorne J, 2005, NOUS, V39, P179, DOI 10.1111/j.0029-4624.2005.00499.x ; Hawthorne John, 2003, KNOWLEDGE LOTTERIES; HAWTHORNE J, SOMETHING MIND; JOHNSTON M, 1992, PHILOS STUD, V68, P221, DOI 10.1007/BF00694847 ; KENNEDY C, STUDIES LINGUISTIC S, V29, P65; KLEIN E, 2008, LINGUIST PHILOS, V4, P1; LEWIS D, 1997, PAPERS METAPHYSICS E, P133; LUDLOW P, 1989, LINGUIST PHILOS, V12, P519, DOI 10.1007/BF00632474 ; Mackie J. L., 1973, TRUTH PROBABILITY PA; MANLEY D, DISPOSITIONS HABITUA; Manley D, 2007, PHILOS QUART, V57, P68, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.469.x ; MARTIN CB, 1994, PHILOS QUART, V44, P1, DOI 10.2307/2220143 ; McKitrick J, 2003, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V81, P155, DOI 10.1080/713659629 ; Mellor DH, 2000, MIND, V109, P757, DOI 10.1093/mind/109.436.757 ; Mumford S, 1998, DISPOSITIONS; NUNBERG G, 1993, LINGUIST PHILOS, V16, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF00984721 ; Partee Partee B., 1976, MONTAGUE GRAMMAR; PRIOR EW, 1982, AM PHILOS QUART, V19, P251; Prior E. W., 1985, DISPOSITIONS; Quine Willard Van Orman, 1960, WORD OBJECT; Ryle G., 1949, CONCEPT MIND; SCHWARZSCHILD R, 2002, NATURAL LANGUAGE SEM, P1; Schwarzschild R., 2002, J SEMANT, V19, P289, DOI DOI 10.1093/JOS/19.3.289; SMITH AD, 1977, MIND, V86, P439; VAN BENTHEM Johan, 1997, HDB LOGIC LANGUAGE; VANFRASSEN B, LAWS SYMMETRY, pIG8; von Stechow A., 1984, J SEMANT, V3, P1, DOI DOI 10.1093/J0S/3.1-2.1; Williamson T, 1998, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V49, P89, DOI 10.1093/bjps/49.1.89","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzn003",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","269UC","WOS:000253674800003",,,,,"2018-01-02",70.0,"cresswellmj faram fodorjd goodmannelson hawthornej hawthornejohn hawthornej johnstonm kennedyc kleine lewisd ludlowp mackiejl manleyd manleyd martincb mckitrickj mellordh mumfords nunbergg parteeparteeb priorew priorew quinewillardvanorman ryleg schwarzschildr schwarzschildr smithad vanbenthemjohan vanfrassenb vonstechowa williamsont birda","cluster_3"
-0.6535704739092826,-0.3536570998682963,23.0,53.0,53.0,0.0,1.0,1990.0,99.0,393.0,1.0,21.0,21.0,"J","PETTIT, P",,,,"PETTIT, P",,,"THE REALITY OF RULE-FOLLOWING","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"PETTIT, P (reprint author), AUSTRALIAN NATL UNIV,RES SCH SOCIAL SCI,CANBERRA,ACT 2601,AUSTRALIA.",,,,,,"BLACKBURN S, 1984, SYNTHESE, P294; CRAIG E, 1982, MIND, P341; Davidson Donald, 1984, TRUTH INTERPRETATION; FODOR J, THEORY CONTENT 2; Fogelin R., 1987, WITTGENSTEIN; GOLDFARB W, 1985, J PHILOS; Goodman N., 1969, LANGUAGES ART; JACKSON F, 1988, MIND, V97, P381; JACKSON F, 1987, MIND, P381; JACKSON F, IN PRESS PHILOS STUD; Johnston M, 1989, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V63; Kripke Saul Aaron, 1982, WITTGENSTEIN RULES P; MCDOWELL J, 1984, SYNTHESE, P326; MCGINN C, 1984, WITTGENSTEIN MEANING, P144; MCGINN M, 1984, RATIO, P19; MCLAUGHLIN B, 1985, ACTION EVENTS; PETTIT PHILIP, 1982, MARX AND MARXISMS; PETTIT P, IN PRESS COMMON MIND; Price Huw, 1989, FACTS FUNCTION TRUTH; PRICE H, FACTS FUNCTION TRUTH; Wright C., 1988, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, p[1, 22]; WRIGHT C, 1986, SUBJECT THOUGHT CONT, P209; Wright C., 1986, SUBJECT THOUGHT CONT","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","CL170","WOS:A1990CL17000001",,,,,"2018-01-02",71.0,"craige davidsondonald fodorj fogelinr goldfarbw goodmann jacksonf jacksonf jacksonf johnstonm kripkesaulaaron mcdowellj mcginnc mcginnm mclaughlinb pettitphilip pettitp pricehuw priceh wrightc wrightc wrightc blackburns","cluster_0"
-0.3074162760736882,-0.2975018082819252,11.0,53.0,53.0,0.0,0.0,1988.0,97.0,386.0,238.0,251.0,14.0,"J","HEIL, J",,,,"HEIL, J",,,"PRIVILEGED ACCESS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"HEIL, J (reprint author), UNIV CALIF BERKELEY,DEPT PSYCHOL,3210 TOLMAN HALL,BERKELEY,CA 94720, USA.",,,,,,"ALSTON WP, 1971, AM PHILOS Q, P223; BURGE T, 1986, J PHILOS, V83, P697, DOI 10.2307/2026694 ; DAVIDSON D, 1987, P ADDRESSES AM PHILO, P441; Davidson D., 1984, INQUIRIES TRUTH INTE, P155; HEIL J, IN PRESS AUSTRALASIA; HEIL J, 1982, J MIND BEHAVIOR, P143; KOSSLYN S, 1979, BEHAVIORAL BRAIN SCI, P535; Millikan R. G., 1984, LANGUAGE THOUGHT OTH; Putnam Hilary, 1981, REASON TRUTH HIST; Searle J., 1985, MINDS BRAINS SCI; WITTGENSTEIN L, TRACTATUS LOGICO-PHI","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","N6896","WOS:A1988N689600005",,,,,"2018-01-02",72.0,"burget davidsond davidsond heilj heilj kosslyns millikanrg putnamhilary searlej wittgensteinl alstonwp","cluster_0"
-0.3509406466751364,-0.07669100470089216,22.0,52.0,52.0,0.0,1.0,1999.0,108.0,429.0,127.0,143.0,17.0,"J","Williamson, T",,,,"Williamson, T",,,"On the structure of higher-order vagueness","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, Midlothian, Scotland","Williamson, T (reprint author), Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, Midlothian, Scotland.",,,,,,"BURGESS JA, 1990, SYNTHESE, V85, P417, DOI 10.1007/BF00484836 ; DUMMETT M, 1959, PHILOS REV, V68, P324, DOI 10.2307/2182566 ; EDGINGTON D, 1993, ANALYSIS, V53, P193, DOI 10.2307/3328236 ; FINE K, 1965, VAGUENESS READER, P119; HECK RG, 1903, ANALYSIS, V53, P201; HINTIKKA H, 1962, KNOWLEDGE BELIEF; Hughes G.E., 1984, COMPANION MODAL LOGI; Humberstone Lloyd, 1988, DIALECTICA, V42, P183; Keefe Rosanna, 1997, VAGUENESS READER; ROLF B, 1980, J PHILOS LOGIC, V9, P315, DOI 10.1007/BF00248397 ; Sainsbury R. M., 1991, PHILOS Q, V41, P167; Sainsbury R., 1997, VAGUENESS READER, P251; SANFORD DH, 1975, AM PHILOS QUART, V12, P29; VILLANUEVA E, 1997, PHILOS ISSUES, V8; Williams B, 1978, DESCARTES PROJECT PU; Williamson T, 1998, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V49, P89, DOI 10.1093/bjps/49.1.89 ; Williamson T, 1997, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V57, P945, DOI 10.2307/2953813 ; WILLIAMSON T, 1995, MIND, V104, P553; Williamson T., 1997, PHILOS ISSUES, V8, P255; Williamson T., 1994, VAGUENESS; WRIGHT C, 1992, ANALYSIS, V52, P129, DOI 10.2307/3328373 ; WRIGHT C, 1997, VAGUENESS READER, P204","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/108.429.127",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","162JL","WOS:000078342400006",,,,,"2018-01-02",73.0,"dummettm edgingtond finek heckrg hintikkah hughesge humberstonelloyd keeferosanna rolfb sainsburyrm sainsburyr sanforddh villanuevae williamsb williamsont williamsont williamsont williamsont williamsont wrightc wrightc burgessja","cluster_0"
-0.010380176017832438,0.025659763222411053,6.0,52.0,51.0,0.0,0.0,1958.0,67.0,268.0,502.0,513.0,12.0,"J","FOOT, P",,,,"FOOT, P",,,"MORAL ARGUMENTS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"BENTHAM, PRINCIPLES MORALS LE, pR10; FRANKENA WK, 1939, MIND; HARE, LANGUAGE MORALS, P69; HARE, 1954, UNIVERSALISBILITY PA, P304; PRIOR AN, LOGIC BASIS ETHICS, pCH1; ETHICS LANGUAGE, P170","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","CCP46","WOS:A1958CCP4600004",,,,,"2018-01-02",74.0,"frankenawk hare hare prioran ethicslanguage bentham","cluster_0"
-0.49789782640219526,-0.4079044372171373,29.0,50.0,50.0,0.0,3.0,2007.0,116.0,463.0,549.0,596.0,48.0,"J","Hoefer, C",,,,"Hoefer, Carl",,,"The third way on objective probability: A sceptic's guide to objective chance","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"CREDENCE","The goal of this paper is to sketch and defend a new interpretation or 'theory' of objective chance, one that lets us be sure such chances exist and shows how they can play the roles we traditionally grant them. The account is 'Humean' in claiming that objective chances supervene on the totality of actual events, but does not imply or presuppose a Humean approach to other metaphysical issues such as laws or causation. Like Lewis (1994) I take the Principal Principle (PP) to be the key to understanding objective chance. After describing the main features of Humean objective chance (HOC), I deduce the validity of PP for Humean chances, and end by exploring the limitations of Humean chance.","Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain",,"carl.hoefer@uab.es",,,,,"Cartwright N., 1999, DAPPLED WORLD STUDY; DIACONIS P, 2007, SIAM REV, P211; DIACONIS P, 1998, Q J APPL MATH, V856, P797; EARMAN J, 1986, PRIMER DETERMINATION; Elga A, 2004, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V82, P67, DOI 10.1080/713659804 ; FRENCH PA, 1993, MIDWEST STUDIES PHIL, V18; Gillies D., 2000, PHILOS THEORIES PROB; Hajek A, 2003, SYNTHESE, V137, P273, DOI 10.1023/B:SYNT.0000004904.91112.16 ; HAJEK A, 2003, STNAFORD ENCY PHILOS; HAJEK A, 2005, P 12 INT C LOND; Hajek A, 2007, SYNTHESE, V156, P563, DOI 10.1007/s11229-006-9138-5; Hall N, 2004, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V82, P93, DOI 10.1080/713659806 ; Hall N., 1994, MIND, V103, P504; Hoefer C, 1997, MIND, V106, P321, DOI 10.1093/mind/106.422.321 ; HOEFER C, 2005, P 12 INT C LOND; Howson C., 1993, SCI REASONING BAYESI; Humphreys P, 2004, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V55, P667, DOI 10.1093/bjps/55.4.667; LEVI I, 1983, PHILOS REV, V92, P120; LEWIS D, 1994, MIND, V103, P473, DOI 10.1093/mind/103.412.473 ; Lewis David, 1980, STUDIES INDUCTIVE LO, V2, P83; LEWIS D., 1986, PHILOS PAPERS, VII; Loewer B, 2004, PHILOS SCI, V71, P1115, DOI 10.1086/428015; LOEWER B, 2001, STUD HIST PHILOS M P, V32, P309; MELLOR H, 1995, FACTS CAUSTION; SOBER E, 2004, PROBABILITY SCI; Strevens M, 1999, PHILOS STUD, V95, P243, DOI 10.1023/A:1004256510606 ; SUPPES P, 1993, MIDEAST STUDIES PHIL, P242; THAU M, 1994, MIND, V103, P491, DOI 10.1093/mind/103.412.491 ; VONMISES R, 1981, PROBABILTY STAT TRUT","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzm549",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","205FB","WOS:000249098300003",,,,,"2018-01-02",76.0,"diaconisp diaconisp earmanj elgaa frenchpa gilliesd hajeka hajeka hajeka hajeka halln halln hoeferc hoeferc howsonc humphreysp levii lewisd lewisdavid lewisd loewerb loewerb mellorh sobere strevensm suppesp thaum vonmisesr cartwrightn","cluster_3"
0.0286082092685755,0.03112590466147236,5.0,50.0,51.0,0.0,2.0,1965.0,74.0,295.0,326.0,346.0,21.0,"J","PITCHER, G",,,,"PITCHER, G",,,"EMOTION","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"BEDFORD E, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V57, P296; JAMES W, PRINCIPLES PSYCHOL, V2, P449; Urmson J. O., 1952, MIND, V61, P480, DOI DOI 10.1093/MIND/LXI.244.480; WITTGENSTEIN, PHILOS INVESTIGATION, P187; WITTGENSTEIN, 1958, BLUE BROWN BOOKS, P103","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","CGG06","WOS:A1965CGG0600002",,,,,"2018-01-02",77.0,"jamesw urmsonjo wittgenstein wittgenstein bedforde","cluster_0"
-0.16490191535326057,0.22852871735908098,25.0,47.0,47.0,0.0,1.0,2007.0,116.0,463.0,511.0,522.0,12.0,"J","Danielsson, S; Olson, J",,,,"Danielsson, Sven; Olson, Jonas",,,"Brentano and the buck-passers","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"REASONS; KIND","According to T. M. Scanlon's 'buck-passing' analysis of value, x is good means that x has properties that provide reasons to take UP positive attitudes vis-i-vis x. Some authors have claimed that this idea can be traced back to Franz Brentano, who said in 1889 that the judgement that x is good is the judgement that a positive attitude to x is correct ('richtig). The most discussed problem in the recent literature on buckpassing is known as the 'wrong kind of reason' problem (the WKR problem): it seems quite possible that there is sometimes reason to favour an object although that object is not good and possibly very evil. The problem is to delineate exactly what distinguishes reasons of the right kind from reasons of the wrong kind. In this paper we offer a Brentano-style solution. We also note that one version of the WKR problem was put forward by G. E. Moore in his review of the English translation of Brentano's Vom Ursprung sittlicher Erkenntnis. Before getting to how our Brentano-style approach might offer a way out for Brentano and the buck-passers, we briefly consider and reject an interesting attempt to solve the WKR problem recently proposed by John Skorupski.","Uppsala Univ, Dept Philosophy, S-75126 Uppsala, Sweden; Univ Oxford Brasenose Coll, Oxford OX1 4AJ, England","Danielsson, S (reprint author), Uppsala Univ, Dept Philosophy, Box 627, S-75126 Uppsala, Sweden.",,,,,,"BRENTANO F, 1973, FDN CONSTRUCTIONS ET; Brentano F., 1889, URSPRUNG SITTLICHER; Chisholm Roderick M, 1986, BRENTANO INTRINSIC V; DANCY J, 2000, PHILOS TRUE GOOD BEA; Josefsson J., 2001, EXPLORING PRACTICAL; EGONSSON D, HOMMAGE WLODEK PHILO; EWING AC, 1939, MIND, V39, P1; FRANKS G, 1969, NEW SCHOLASTICISM, V43; GIBBARD A, 1990, WISE CHOICES APT FEE; McAlister Linda, 1976, PHILOS BRENTANO; Moore GE, 1903, INT J ETHICS, V14, P115, DOI 10.1086/intejethi.14.1.2376027 ; OHEARY A, 2000, PHILOS TRUE GOOD BEA; OLSERETTI S, 2006, PREFERENCES WELL BEI; Olson J, 2004, PHILOS QUART, V54, P295, DOI 10.1111/j.0031-8094.2004.00353.x ; OLSON J, IN PRESS REASONS NEW; PARFFIT D, 2001, HOMMAGE WLODEK PHILO; Pascal B., 1660, PASCALS PENSEES; Persson I., 2007, HOMMAGE WLODEK PHILO; PILLER C, 2006, PREFERENCES WELL BEI; Rabinowicz W, 2006, PHILOS QUART, V56, P114, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2005.00432.x ; Rabinowicz W, 2004, ETHICS, V114, P391, DOI 10.1086/381694 ; SCANLON T., 1998, WHAT WE OWE EACH OTH; SKORUPSKI J, IN PRESS UNITY DIVER; Skorupski John, 2007, HOMMAGE WLODEK PHILO; Stratton-Lake P, 2005, ETHICS, V115, P788, DOI 10.1086/430491","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzm511",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","205FB","WOS:000249098300001",,,,,"2018-01-02",79.0,"brentanof chisholmroderickm dancyj josefssonj egonssond ewingac franksg gibbarda mcalisterlinda moorege ohearya olserettis olsonj olsonj parffitd pascalb perssoni pillerc rabinowiczw rabinowiczw scanlont skorupskij skorupskijohn strattonlakep brentanof","cluster_6"
-0.13371036431433575,-0.114792897610306,4.0,47.0,47.0,0.0,1.0,1996.0,105.0,419.0,451.0,466.0,16.0,"J","TRAVIS, C",,,,"TRAVIS, C",,,"MEANINGS ROLE IN TRUTH","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"TRAVIS, C (reprint author), UNIV STIRLING,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,STIRLING FK9 4LA,SCOTLAND.",,,"Travis, Charles/0000-0003-2370-7685",,,"Frege G., 1977, LOGICAL INVESTIGATIO; Horwich P., 1990, TRUTH; TRAVIS C, IN PRESS COMPANION P; WRIGHT C, IN PRESS COMPANION P","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/105.419.451",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","UZ497","WOS:A1996UZ49700003",,,,,"2018-01-02",80.0,"horwichp travisc wrightc fregeg","cluster_0"
-0.13424285172061826,-0.04359958776039218,14.0,47.0,47.0,0.0,0.0,1994.0,103.0,409.0,5.0,24.0,20.0,"J","HEAL, J",,,,"HEAL, J",,,"MOORE PARADOX - A WITTGENSTEINIAN APPROACH","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"HEAL, J (reprint author), UNIV CAMBRIDGE ST JOHNS COLL,CAMBRIDGE CB2 1TP,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"AUSIN JL, 1962, DO THINGS WORDS; Baldwin T., 1990, GE MOORE; GOMBAY A, 1988, PHILOSOPHY, V63, P191, DOI 10.1017/S0031819100043369 ; HEAL BJ, 1989, FACT MEANING; JONES OR, 1991, ANALYSIS, V51, P183, DOI 10.2307/3328752 ; LINVILLE K, 1991, SYNTHESE, V87, P295, DOI 10.1007/BF00485405 ; Moore G. E., 1942, PHILOS GE MOORE; Moore G. E, 1944, PHILOS B RUSSELL; PEARS D, 1991, SYNTHESE, V87, P273, DOI 10.1007/BF00485403 ; SORENSEN R, 1988, BLINDSOPTS; Wittgenstein L., 1953, PHILOS INVESTIGATION; WITTGENSTEIN L, 1980, REMARKS PHILOSOPHY P, V1; WRIGHT C, 1989, J PHILOS, V86, P622, DOI 10.5840/jphil1989861110 ; Wright C., 1989, REFLECTIONS CHOMSKY, P233","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/103.409.5",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","MW974","WOS:A1994MW97400002",,,,,"2018-01-02",81.0,"baldwint gombaya healbj jonesor linvillek moorege moorege pearsd sorensenr wittgensteinl wittgensteinl wrightc wrightc ausinjl","cluster_0"
-0.0010975805641645284,-0.004061179846420188,6.0,46.0,46.0,0.0,1.0,2002.0,111.0,441.0,69.0,79.0,11.0,"J","Colyvan, M",,,,"Colyvan, M",,,"Mathematics and aesthetic considerations in science","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"INDISPENSABILITY",,"Univ Leeds, Sch Philos, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England","Colyvan, M (reprint author), Univ Leeds, Sch Philos, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England.",,,,,,"Colyvan M, 2002, MIND, V111, P69, DOI 10.1093/mind/111.441.69 ; Colyvan M, 1999, PHILOS STUD, V96, P1, DOI 10.1023/A:1004248218844 ; Kreisel G., 1967, PROBLEMS PHILOS MATH, P138; LAKATOS I, 1967, PROBLEMS PHILOS MATH; Melia J, 2000, MIND, V109, P455, DOI 10.1093/mind/109.435.455 ; SHAPIRO S, 1991, FDN WITHOUT FOUNDATI","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/111.441.69",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","528BC","WOS:000174222700006",,,,,"2018-01-02",82.0,"colyvanm kreiselg lakatosi meliaj shapiros colyvanm","cluster_0"
-1.201565087089013,-0.9935984020464953,40.0,46.0,46.0,0.0,1.0,1996.0,105.0,417.0,85.0,117.0,33.0,"J","MENZIES, P",,,,"MENZIES, P",,,"PROBABILISTIC CAUSATION AND THE PRE-EMPTION PROBLEM","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"MENZIES, P (reprint author), MACQUARIE UNIV,SCH HIST PHILOS & POLIT,N RYDE,NSW 2109,AUSTRALIA.",,,,,,"ASQUITH P, 1985, PSA 1984; Bennett J., EVENTS THEIR NAMES; BENNETT J, 1993, CAUSATION, P217; BIGELOW J, SCI NECESSITY; BRAITHWAITE R, 1931, F MATH; BRAND M, 1975, ACTION THEORY; CARNAP R, PHILOS F PHYSICS; CHURCHLAND PM, MATTER CONSCIOUSNESS; DAVIDSON D, ESSAYS ACTIONS EVENT; DAVIDSON D, 1972, SEMANTICS NATURAL LA; DOWE P, 1993, M AUSTR ASS PHIL; EELLS E, PROBABILISTIC CAUSAL; Fair David, 1979, ERKENNTNIS, V14, P219, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00174894; GUTTENPLAN S, 1994, COMPANION PHILOS MIN; JACKSON F, 1992, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V70, P475, DOI 10.1080/00048409212345351 ; JACKSON F, 1992, ECON PHILOS, V8, P1, DOI 10.1017/S0266267100000468 ; KIM J, 1975, ACTION THEORY, P159; Kripke S., 1972, SEMANTICS NATURAL LA, P253, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_9; LEWIS D, 1983, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V61, P343, DOI 10.1080/00048408312341131 ; LEWIS D, PHILOS PAPERS, V2; LEWIS D, PHILOS PAPERS, V1; Lewis D., 1972, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V50, P249, DOI 10.1080/00048407212341301; Lewis David, 1994, COMPANION PHILOS MIN; LEWIS D, PLURALITY WORLDS; MELLOR DH, MATTERS METAPHYSICS; MENZIES P, 1989, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V67, P59, DOI 10.1080/00048408912343681 ; MENZIES P, 1988, MIND, V97, P551; MENZIES P, 1989, PHILOS SCI, V56, P642, DOI 10.1086/289518 ; RAMACHANDRAN M, UNPUB INTRO SUFFICIE; RAMSEY FP, 1931, F MATHEMATICS LOGICA; ROSEN D, 1978, PHILOS SCI, V45, P368; RUBEN DH, 1994, NOUS, V28, P465, DOI 10.2307/2215475 ; SALMON WC, SCI EXPLANATION CAUS; SKYRMS B, CAUSAL NECESSITY; SOBER E, 1985, PSA 1984, P405; SOBER E, NATURE SELECTION; Sosa E., 1993, CAUSATION; SUPPES P, PROBABILISTIC METAPH; SUPPES P, PROBABILISTIC THEORY; TOOLEY M, CAUSATION REALIST AP","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/105.417.85",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","TT053","WOS:A1996TT05300003",,,,,"2018-01-02",83.0,"bennettj bennettj bigelowj braithwaiter brandm carnapr churchlandpm davidsond davidsond dowep eellse fairdavid guttenplans jacksonf jacksonf kimj kripkes lewisd lewisd lewisd lewisd lewisdavid lewisd mellordh menziesp menziesp menziesp ramachandranm ramseyfp rosend rubendh salmonwc skyrmsb sobere sobere sosae suppesp suppesp tooleym asquithp","cluster_3"
-0.1452834298964787,-0.18637017453131016,12.0,46.0,46.0,0.0,1.0,1961.0,70.0,277.0,1.0,24.0,24.0,"J","GOODMAN, N",,,,"GOODMAN, N",,,"ABOUT .1.","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"CARNAP R, 1937, LOGICAL SYNTAX LANGU, P284; CHOMSKY N, 1953, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V18, P242; GOODMAN N, 1951, STRUCTURE APPEARANCE, P287; Goodman N., 1956, PROBLEM UNIVERSALS S, P13; Goodman N., 1949, ANALYSIS, V10, P1; HARRIS Z, 1951, METHODS STRUCTURAL L, pCH15; Putnam H., 1958, PHILOS SCI, V25, P125; Ryle Gilbert, 1933, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, VXII, P18; Ryle Gilbert, 1933, ANALYSIS, V1, P10; TARSKI, 1956, LOGIC SEMANTICS META, P215; [Anonymous], 1939, J PHILOS, V36, P701; 1945, MIND, V54, P102","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","CGR77","WOS:A1961CGR7700001",,,,,"2018-01-02",84.0,"chomskyn goodmann goodmann goodmann harrisz putnamh rylegilbert rylegilbert tarski carnapr","cluster_0"
-0.6760505729096964,-0.6107390114096629,40.0,45.0,45.0,0.0,0.0,1998.0,107.0,425.0,113.0,135.0,23.0,"J","Saka, P",,,,"Saka, P",,,"Quotation and the use-mention distinction","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"IDENTITY THEORY",,"Univ Illinois, Dept Philosophy, Urbana, IL 61801 USA","Saka, P (reprint author), Univ Illinois, Dept Philosophy, Urbana, IL 61801 USA.",,,,,,"Anscombe G. E. M., 1957, ANALYSIS, V17, P49; ATLAS J, 1989, PHILOS WITHOUT AMBIG; BENNETT J, 1988, NOUS, V22, P399, DOI 10.2307/2215710 ; Boolos George, 1995, ON QUINE, P283; Cappelen H, 1997, MIND, V106, P429, DOI 10.1093/mind/106.423.429 ; CHRISTENSEN NE, 1967, PHILOS REV, V76, P358, DOI 10.2307/2183624 ; DAVIDSON D., 1984, INQUIRIES TRUTH INTE; Fauconnier Gilles, 1985, MENTAL SPACES; Fodor J., 1983, MODULARITY MIND; Frege G., 1892, SENSE REFERENCE; GARCIACARPINTERO M, 1994, J PHILOS, V91, P253, DOI 10.2307/2940753 ; GARVER N, 1965, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V26, P230, DOI 10.2307/2106184 ; Geach P., 1957, MENTAL ACTS; Geach P. T., 1950, MIND, V59, P388; GOLDSTEIN L, 1984, ANALYSIS, V44, P1, DOI 10.2307/3327441 ; GRANDY RE, 1973, PHILOS REV, V82, P99, DOI 10.2307/2184241 ; Horn L. R., 1989, NATURAL HIST NEGATIO; Jackendoff Ray, 1983, SEMANTICS COGNITION; JORGENSEN J, 1984, J EXP PSYCHOL GEN, V113, P112, DOI 10.1037//0096-3445.113.1.112; Lyons John, 1977, SEMANTICS; Norrick N.R., 1981, SEMIOTIC PRINCIPLES; NUNBERG G, 1979, LINGUIST PHILOS, V3, P143, DOI 10.1007/BF00126509 ; Ogden C. K., 1923, MEANING MEANING; Partee B., 1973, FESTSCHRIFT M HALLE, P410; QUINE WV, 1961, FROM LOGICAL POINT V; Quine Willard Van Orman, 1960, WORD OBJECT; Quine W. V., 1943, J PHILOS, V40, P113; Quine W. V., 1969, ONTOLOGICAL RELATIVI; Quine Willard V. O., 1940, MATH LOGIC; REIMER M, 1996, ANALYSIS, V56, P131, DOI 10.1111/j.0003-2638.1996.00131.x ; RICHARD M, 1986, LINGUIST PHILOS, V9, P383, DOI 10.1007/BF00630275 ; Searle JR, 1969, SPEECH ACTS; SEYMOUR M, 1994, PHILOS STUD, V74, P1; SPERBER DAN-DEIRDRE, 1981, RADICAL PRAGMATICS, P295; Tajtelbaum Al, 1957, ANALYSIS, V17, P52; Tarski A., 1933, CONCEPT TRUTH FORMAL; WASHINGTON C, 1992, J PHILOS, V89, P582, DOI 10.2307/2941057 ; Whitely C. H., 1957, ANALYSIS, V17, P119; Wittgenstein L., PHILOS INVESTIGATION; Ziff P., 1960, SEMANTIC ANAL","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/107.425.113",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","YT694","WOS:000071633700005",,,,,"2018-01-02",85.0,"atlasj bennettj boolosgeorge cappelenh christensenne davidsond fauconniergilles fodorj fregeg garciacarpinterom garvern geachp geachpt goldsteinl grandyre hornlr jackendoffray jorgensenj lyonsjohn norricknr nunbergg ogdenck parteeb quinewv quinewillardvanorman quinewv quinewv quinewillardvo reimerm richardm searlejr seymourm sperberdandeirdre tajtelbaumal tarskia washingtonc whitelych wittgensteinl ziffp anscombegem","cluster_0"
-0.5798642203253154,-0.42864998263548926,21.0,45.0,45.0,0.0,0.0,1985.0,94.0,374.0,177.0,195.0,19.0,"J","JACKSON, F",,,,"JACKSON, F",,,"ON THE SEMANTICS AND LOGIC OF OBLIGATION","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"JACKSON, F (reprint author), MONASH UNIV,CLAYTON,VIC 3168,AUSTRALIA.",,,,,,"Chellas Brian, 1974, LOGICAL THEORY SEMAN; Follesdal D., 1971, DEONTIC LOGIC INTRO; Goldman Alvin I., 1978, VALUES MORALS; GOLDMAN HS, 1977, MIND, V86, P242; GOLDMAN HS, 1976, PHILOS REV, V75, P449; GREENSPAN PS, 1975, J PHILOS, V72, P259, DOI 10.2307/2024734 ; GREENSPAN PS, 1978, PHILOS REV, V77, P77; HANSSON B, 1971, DEONTIC LOGIC; HINTIKKA J, 1971, DEONTIC LOGIC INTRO, P71; HUMBERSTONE IL, 1983, PAC PHILOS QUART, V64, P19; Humberstone I. L., 1971, ANALYSIS, VXXXII, P8, DOI DOI 10.1093/ANALYS/32.1.8; JACKSON F, 1977, AUSTRALASIAN J PHILO, V44, P3; Lewis D., 1973, COUNTERFACTUALS; Lewis D., 1974, LOGICAL THEORY SEMAN; Mott P., 1973, J PHILOS LOGIC, V2, P197; SCHOTCH PK, 1981, NEW STUDIES DEONTIC, P151; Stalnaker Robert C, 1981, IFS; Thomason R., 1981, NEW STUDIES DEONTIC; THOMASON RH, 1981, NEW STUDIES DEONTIC, P170; VANFRAASSEN BC, 1972, J PHILOS LOGIC, V1, P417, DOI 10.1007/BF00255570 ; Van Fraassen B. C., 1973, J PHILOS, V70, P5","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","AGR44","WOS:A1985AGR4400001",,,,,"2018-01-02",86.0,"follesdald goldmanalvini goldmanhs goldmanhs greenspanps greenspanps hanssonb hintikkaj humberstoneil humberstoneil jacksonf lewisd lewisd mottp schotchpk stalnakerrobertc thomasonr thomasonrh vanfraassenbc vanfraassenbc chellasbrian","cluster_3"
-0.31256524985684664,-0.30840041531748885,12.0,44.0,45.0,0.0,0.0,1987.0,96.0,384.0,441.0,462.0,22.0,"J","DAVIES, M",,,,"DAVIES, M",,,"TACIT KNOWLEDGE AND SEMANTIC THEORY - CAN A 5-PERCENT DIFFERENCE MATTER","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"DAVIES, M (reprint author), UNIV LONDON BIRKBECK COLL,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,MALET ST,LONDON WC1E 7HX,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"Chomsky Noam, 1986, KNOWLEDGE LANGUAGE I; CHOMSKY N, 1987, MIND LANGUAGE, P178; Coltheart M., 1985, ATTENTION PERFORM, VXI, P3; Davies M., 1981, MEANING QUANTIFICATI; DAVIES M, 1981, SYNTHESE, P135; EVANS G, 1985, COLLECT PAPERS, P25; EVANS G, COLLECTED PAPERS, P322; PEACOCKE C, 1986, MIND LANGUAGE, P101; PEACOCKE CAB, 1979, HOLISTIC EXPLANATION; Quine W. V., 1972, SEMANTICS NATURAL LA, p[442, 451]; WRIGHT C, 1986, MIND LANGUAGE, P31; Wellwood A, 2009, REALISM MEANING TRUT","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","K9527","WOS:A1987K952700001",,,,,"2018-01-02",87.0,"chomskyn coltheartm daviesm daviesm evansg evansg peacockec peacockecab quinewv wrightc wellwooda chomskynoam","cluster_0"
-0.07321780845458797,-0.1633393641541119,16.0,44.0,44.0,0.0,0.0,1981.0,90.0,359.0,321.0,342.0,22.0,"J","HEIL, J",,,,"HEIL, J",,,"DOES COGNITIVE-PSYCHOLOGY REST ON A MISTAKE","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"HEIL, J (reprint author), CORNELL UNIV,ITHACA,NY 14853, USA.",,,,,,"Chomsky N., 1965, ASPECTS THEORY SYNTA; Dennett D. C., 1978, BRAINSTORMS; DENNETT DC, UNPUBLISHED; Dreyfus Hubert, 1972, WHAT COMPUTERS CANT; Fodor J. A., 1975, LANGUAGE THOUGHT; Fodor J. A., 1974, PSYCHOL LANGUAGE INT; Greene Judith, 1972, PSYCHOLINGUISTICS CH; HEIL J, 1979, CRITICA, V11, P3; KOHLER W., 1929, GESTALT PSYCHOL; Malcolm N., 1970, NOUS, V4, P59; MCLENDON HIRAM J., 1955, MIND, V64, P79; RUNESON S, 1977, SCAND J PSYCHOL, V18, P172, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1977.tb00274.x; Weizenbaum J., 1976, COMPUTER POWER HUMAN; Wittgenstein L., PHILOS INVESTIGATION; WITTGENSTEIN L, NOTEBOOKS 1914 1918; Wittgenstein Ludwig, TRACTATUS LOGICO PHI","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","LX072","WOS:A1981LX07200001",,,,,"2018-01-02",88.0,"dennettdc dennettdc dreyfushubert fodorja fodorja greenejudith heilj kohlerw malcolmn mclendonhiramj runesons weizenbaumj wittgensteinl wittgensteinl wittgensteinludwig chomskyn","cluster_0"
0.022591256027890243,0.06287664962344691,11.0,43.0,43.0,0.0,0.0,1958.0,67.0,267.0,344.0,365.0,22.0,"J","WATKINS, JWN",,,,"WATKINS, JWN",,,"CONFIRMABLE AND INFLUENTIAL METAPHYSICS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"CAMPBELL CA, 1951, MIND OCT; LOCKE J, ESSAYS LAW NATURE, P26; MABBOTT JD, CONT BRIT PHILOS; POLANYI M, 1952, BRIT J PHILOS SC NOV; POPPER, LOGIC SCI DISCOVERY; POPPER KR, 11TH P INT C PHIL; RANKE, DEBATES HIST; WATKINS JWN, 1955, PHILOS Q APR; WATKINS JWN, 1957, BRIT J PHILOS SC AUG; WEYL H, PHILOS MATH NATURAL, P276; 1957, PHILOSOPHY APR","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","CCP45","WOS:A1958CCP4500005",,,,,"2018-01-02",89.0,"lockej mabbottjd polanyim popper popperkr ranke watkinsjwn watkinsjwn weylh campbellca","cluster_4"
-0.21006427265956298,-0.06217564224407136,26.0,42.0,42.0,0.0,0.0,2001.0,110.0,437.0,99.0,148.0,50.0,"J","Fodor, J",,,,"Fodor, J",,,"Doing without what's within: Fiona Cowie's critique of nativism ('What's Within? Nativism Reconsidered')","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"Rutgers State Univ, Dept Philosophy, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA","Fodor, J (reprint author), Rutgers State Univ, Dept Philosophy, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA.",,,,,,"BLOCK N, READINGS PHILOS PSYC; Brown R., 1970, COGNITION DEV LANGUA, P11; CHOMSKY N, LANGUAGE MIND; Chomsky N., ASPECTS THEORY SYNTA; CHURCHLAND PM, ON CONTRARY; COWIE F., 1999, WHATS WITHIN NATIVIS; Elman Jeff L., 1996, RETHINKING INNATENES; FODOR F, 1981, REPRESENTATIONS; Fodor J, 1999, J PHILOS, V96, P381, DOI 10.2307/2564628 ; FODOR J, HOLISM SHOPPERS GUID; FODOR J, MIND DOESNT WORK THA; FODOR JA, CONCEPTS; FODOR JA, ELM EXPERT; FODOR JA, CRITICAL CONDITION; Fodor J.A., 1981, REPRESENTATIONS; Fodor JD, 1998, LINGUIST INQ, V29, P1, DOI 10.1162/002438998553644 ; GUNDERSSON K, 1975, MINNESOTA STUDIES PH; Hayes J. R., 1970, COGNITION DEV LANGUA; Hume David, 1739, TREATISE HUMAN NATUR; Hume David, DIALOGUES NATURAL RE; KARMILOFFSMITH A, BEYOND MODULARITY; NOZICK R, PHILOS EXPLANATIONS; PIATELLIPALMARI.M, LANGUAGE LEARNING DE; Putnam Hilary, 1975, MINNESOTA STUDIES PH; ROZEN P, 1976, ADV STUD BEHAV, V6, P21; SMOLENSKY P, 1988, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V11, P1, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X00052432","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/110.437.99",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","406EB","WOS:000167201000004",,,,,"2018-01-02",90.0,"brownr chomskyn chomskyn churchlandpm cowief elmanjeffl fodorf fodorj fodorj fodorj fodorja fodorja fodorja fodorja fodorjd gunderssonk hayesjr humedavid humedavid karmiloffsmitha nozickr piatellipalmarim putnamhilary rozenp smolenskyp blockn","cluster_0"
-0.7136769008593976,-0.3288638834757811,21.0,42.0,43.0,0.0,2.0,1999.0,108.0,432.0,705.0,725.0,21.0,"J","Tye, M",,,,"Tye, M",,,"Phenomenal consciousness: The explanatory gap as a cognitive illusion","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"QUALIA",,"Temple Univ, Dept Philosophy, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA","Tye, M (reprint author), Temple Univ, Dept Philosophy, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA.",,,,,,"ARMSTRONG DM, 1968, MATERIALIST THEORY M; BLOCK N, IN PRESS PHILOS REV; chalmers D., 1996, CONSCIOUS MIND; Dretske F., 1995, NATURALIZING MIND; DUBOISREYMOND E, 1885, REDEN; Harman G., 1990, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V4, P31, DOI DOI 10.2307/2214186; HORGAN T, 1984, PHILOS QUART, V34, P147, DOI 10.2307/2219508 ; JACKSON F, 1982, PHILOS QUART, V32, P127, DOI 10.2307/2960077 ; Jackson Frank, 1993, PHILOS MIND; LEVINE J, 1983, PAC PHILOS QUART, V64, P354; Loar B., 1990, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V4, P81, DOI [DOI 10.2307/2214188, 10.2307/2214188]; Lycan William G., 1996, CONSCIOUSNESS EXPERI; McGinn C., 1991, PROBLEM CONSCIOUSNES; NAGEL T, 1974, PHILOS REV, V83, P435, DOI 10.2307/2183914 ; Papineau D., 1994, PHILOS NATURALISM; REY G, 1991, PHILOS ISSUES, P118; SEARLE J. R., 1992, REDISCOVERY MIND; STURGEON S, 1994, J PHILOS, V91, P221, DOI 10.2307/2940751 ; Tomberlin James, 1990, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V4; Tye Michael, 1995, 10 PROBLEMS CONSCIOU; TYE M, IN PRESS CONSCIOUSNE","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/108.432.705",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","248LA","WOS:000083275000003",,,,,"2018-01-02",91.0,"blockn chalmersd dretskef duboisreymonde harmang horgant jacksonf jacksonfrank levinej loarb lycanwilliamg mcginnc nagelt papineaud reyg searlejr sturgeons tomberlinjames tyemichael tyem armstrongdm","cluster_0"
-1.0413102447661482,-0.6552711145876291,21.0,42.0,42.0,0.0,0.0,1994.0,103.0,411.0,287.0,302.0,16.0,"J","JACKSON, F; OPPY, G; SMITH, M",,,,"JACKSON, F; OPPY, G; SMITH, M",,,"MINIMALISM AND TRUTH-APTNESS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"MONASH UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,CLAYTON,VIC 3168,AUSTRALIA","JACKSON, F (reprint author), AUSTRALIAN NATL UNIV,CANBERRA,ACT 2600,AUSTRALIA.",,,"Oppy, Graham/0000-0003-0453-2250",,,"Adams E., 1975, LOGIC CONDITIONALS; Ayer Alfred Jules, 1936, LANGUAGE TRUTH LOGIC; BLACKBURN S, 1987, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V12, P361; Blackburn S, 1984, SPREADING WORD; BOGHOSSIAN PA, 1990, PHILOS REV, V99, P157, DOI 10.2307/2185488 ; DEVITT M, 1990, PAC PHILOS QUART, V71, P247; Field H., 1986, FACT SCI MORALITY, P55; FRENCH PA, 1987, MIDWEST STUDIES PHIL, V12; HARE R. M., 1952, LANGUAGE MORALS; HORWICH P, 1994, ANALYSIS, V54, P19, DOI 10.2307/3328098 ; HORWICH P, 1993, PHILOS PUBLIC AFF, V22, P67; Horwich P., 1990, TRUTH; HUMBERSTONE IL, 1991, CONDITIONALS PHILOS, V51, P227; Jackson F., 1987, CONDITIONALS; Lewis D., 1983, PHILOS PAPERS, VI, P78; Lewis David, 1983, PHILOS PAPERS, V1, P133; Lewis D. K., 1969, CONVENTION PHILOS ST; Macdonald G., 1986, FACT SCI MORALITY; Quine W. V., 1970, PHILOS LOGIC; STOLJAR D, 1993, PHILOS STUD, V70, P81, DOI 10.1007/BF00989663 ; WRIGHT C., 1992, TRUTH OBJECTIVITY","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/103.411.287",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","NY276","WOS:A1994NY27600002",,,,,"2018-01-02",92.0,"ayeralfredjules blackburns blackburns boghossianpa devittm fieldh frenchpa harerm horwichp horwichp horwichp humberstoneil jacksonf lewisd lewisdavid lewisdk macdonaldg quinewv stoljard wrightc adamse","cluster_3"
-0.23658645838153217,0.35196703263249524,48.0,42.0,44.0,1.0,8.0,1993.0,102.0,405.0,1.0,35.0,35.0,"J","HOLLIS, M; SUGDEN, R",,,,"HOLLIS, M; SUGDEN, R",,,"RATIONALITY IN ACTION","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"STRATEGIC BEHAVIOR; BACKWARD INDUCTION; GAMES; INFORMATION; EQUILIBRIA; PLAYERS; PARADOX",,,"HOLLIS, M (reprint author), UNIV E ANGLIA,SCH ECON & SOCIAL STUDIES,NORWICH NR4 7TJ,NORFOLK,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"AUMANN RJ, 1987, ECONOMETRICA, V55, P1, DOI 10.2307/1911154 ; BASU K, 1990, INT J GAME THEORY, V19, P33, DOI 10.1007/BF01753706 ; Bentham J., 1970, INTRO PRINCIPLES MOR; BERNHEIM BD, 1984, ECONOMETRICA, V52, P1007, DOI 10.2307/1911196 ; Bicchieri Christina, 1989, ERKENNTNIS, V30, P69; BINMORE K, 1987, ECON PHILOS, V3, P179, DOI 10.1017/S0266267100002893 ; BINMORE K, 1988, ECON PHILOS, V4, P9, DOI 10.1017/S0266267100000328 ; Binmore Ken, 1993, RATIONALITY JUSTICE; BONANNO G, 1991, ECON PHILOS, V7, P37, DOI 10.1017/S0266267100000900 ; Edgeworth F. Y., 1881, MATH PSYCHICS; Elster J., 1979, ULYSSES SIRENS; Frankfurt H., 1971, J PHILOS, V68, P5, DOI DOI 10.2307/2024717; GAUTHIER D, 1975, DIALOGUE-CAN PHILOS, V14, P195, DOI 10.1017/S0012217300043365 ; Gauthier D., 1986, MORALS AGREEMENT; GAUTHIER D, 1993, RATIONALITY JUSTICE; Gilbert M., 1989, SOCIAL FACTS; HARSANYI JC, 1988, GENERAL THEORY EQUIL; Heap Shaun Hargreaves, 1992, THEORY CHOICE CRITIC; Hobbes T., 1991, LEVIATHAN; HODGSON D. H., 1967, CONSEQUENCES UTILITA; HOLLIS M, 1990, ANALYSIS, V50, P49, DOI 10.2307/3328846 ; HOLLIS M, 1991, J PHILOS, V88, P473, DOI 10.2307/2026602 ; Hume D, 1758, ENQUIRY HUMAN UNDERS; Hume David, 1978, TREATISE HUMAN NATUR; Hurley S.L., 1989, NATURAL REASONS; Jevons W.S, 1970, THEORY POLITICAL EC; KAHNEMAN D, 1979, ECONOMETRICA, V47, P263, DOI 10.2307/1914185 ; KOHLBERG E, 1986, ECONOMETRICA, V54, P1003, DOI 10.2307/1912320 ; KREPS DM, 1982, J ECON THEORY, V27, P253, DOI 10.1016/0022-0531(82)90030-8 ; Lewis D. K., 1969, CONVENTION PHILOS ST; Luce R. D., 1957, GAMES DECISIONS; McClennen E.F, 1990, RATIONALITY DYNAMIC; Pareto V., 1927, MANUAL POLITICAL EC; PEARCE DG, 1984, ECONOMETRICA, V52, P1029, DOI 10.2307/1911197 ; PETTIT P, 1989, J PHILOS, V86, P169, DOI 10.2307/2026960 ; RAMSEY FP, 1931, F MATH OTHER LOGICAL; Regan D, 1980, UTILITARIANISM COOPE; RENY PJ, 1992, ECONOMETRICA, V60, P627, DOI 10.2307/2951586 ; Robbins L., 1932, ESSAY NATURE SIGNIFI; SAMUELSON P, 1947, F EC ANAL; SAVAGE LJ, 1954, F STATISTICS; Schelling TC, 1960, STRATEGY CONFLICT; SELTEN R, 1978, THEOR DECIS, V9, P127, DOI 10.1007/BF00131770 ; SUGDEN R, 1991, ECON J, V101, P751, DOI 10.2307/2233854 ; Sugden Robert, 1986, EC RIGHTS COOPERATIO; Sugden R., 1992, RATIONAL INTERACTION, P201; VANDAMME E, 1989, J ECON THEORY, V48, P476, DOI 10.1016/0022-0531(89)90038-0 ; von Neumann J, 1947, THEORY GAMES EC BEHA","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/102.405.1",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","KK060","WOS:A1993KK06000001",,,,,"2018-01-02",93.0,"basuk benthamj bernheimbd bicchierichristina binmorek binmorek binmoreken bonannog edgeworthfy elsterj frankfurth gauthierd gauthierd gauthierd gilbertm harsanyijc heapshaunhargreaves hobbest hodgsondh hollism hollism humed humedavid hurleysl jevonsws kahnemand kohlberge krepsdm lewisdk lucerd mcclennenef paretov pearcedg pettitp ramseyfp regand renypj robbinsl samuelsonp savagelj schellingtc seltenr sugdenr sugdenrobert sugdenr vandammee vonneumannj aumannrj","cluster_6"
-0.43095300868716063,-0.3257922995829985,13.0,42.0,42.0,0.0,0.0,1979.0,88.0,351.0,394.0,409.0,16.0,"J","CARR, D",,,,"CARR, D",,,"LOGIC OF KNOWING HOW AND ABILITY","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"CARR, D (reprint author), DUNFERMLINE COLL,EDINBURGH,SCOTLAND.",,,,,,"Anscombe G. E. M., 1957, INTENTION; ARMSTRONG DM, 1968, MATERIALIST THEORY M; CHISHOLM RM, 1964, J PHILOS, V61, P613, DOI 10.2307/2023443 ; COHEN MD, 1969, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V70; DAVIDSON D, 1967, J PHILOS, V64, P691, DOI 10.2307/2023853 ; DAVIDSON D, 1963, J PHILOS, V60, P685, DOI 10.2307/2023177 ; DAVIDSON D, 1966, LOGIC DECISION ACTIO, P81; Geach P., 1957, MENTAL ACTS; GEACH PT, 1957, MENTAL ACTS, P15; GEACH PT, 1975, EXPLANATION; KENNY Anthony, 1963, ACTION EMOTION WILL; QUINE WVO, 1953, LOGICAL POINT VIEW, P142; VON WRIGHT G. H, 1963, NORM ACTION","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","HD449","WOS:A1979HD44900006",,,,,"2018-01-02",94.0,"armstrongdm chisholmrm cohenmd davidsond davidsond davidsond geachp geachpt geachpt kennyanthony quinewvo vonwrightgh anscombegem","cluster_0"
-0.19149072017334884,-0.19529539409137878,33.0,41.0,41.0,0.0,3.0,2010.0,119.0,474.0,285.0,306.0,22.0,"J","Colyvan, M",,,,"Colyvan, Mark",,,"There is No Easy Road to Nominalism","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"MATHEMATICS","Hartry Field has shown us a way to be nominalists: we must purge our scientific theories of quantification over abstracta and we must prove the appropriate conservativeness results. This is not a path for the faint hearted. Indeed, the substantial technical difficulties facing Field's project have led some to explore other, easier options. Recently, Jody Azzouni, Joseph Melia, and Stephen Yablo have argued (in different ways) that it is a mistake to read our ontological commitments simply from what the quantifiers of our best scientific theories range over. In this paper, I argue that all three arguments fail and they fail for much the same reason; would-be nominalists are thus left facing Field's hard road.","Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia","Colyvan, M (reprint author), Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.","mcolyvan@usyd.edu.all",,,,,"Azzouni J, 1997, J PHILOS, V94, P472, DOI 10.2307/2564619 ; Azzouni J., 2004, DEFLATING EXISTENTIA; Azzouni Jody, 1997, PHILOS MATH, V5, P193; Baker A, 2005, MIND, V114, P223, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzi223; Balaguer M, 1996, PHILOS STUD, V83, P291, DOI 10.1007/BF00364610 ; Balaguer M., 1998, PLATONISM ANTIPLATON; BURGESS JP, 1997, SUBJECT NO OBJECT ST; Carnap Rudolf, 1956, MEANING NECESSITY ST; Chalmers David David Manley, 2009, METAMETAPHYSICS NEW; Colyvan M, 2002, MIND, V111, P69, DOI 10.1093/mind/111.441.69 ; Colyvan M, 1998, CAN J PHILOS, V28, P313; Colyvan M., 2001, INDISPENSABILITY MAT; Colyvan M., 1998, PHILOS MATH, V6, P39; Colyvan M., 1999, PHILOS MATH, V7, P336; Colyvan M., 2005, PHILOS MATH, V13, P216; Field H., 1980, SCI NUMBERS DEFENCE; Kalderon M. E., 2005, FICTIONALISM METAPHY; Keefe Rosanna, 1997, VAGUENESS READER; Leng M., 2010, MATH REALITY; Leng M., 2007, MATH KNOWLEDGE; Lyon A, 2008, PHILOS MATH, V16, P227, DOI 10.1093/philmat/nkm025; Maddy P., 1997, NATURALISM MATH; Maddy P., 1995, PHILOS MATH, V3, P248; Melia J, 2000, MIND, V109, P455, DOI 10.1093/mind/109.435.455 ; Melia J., 2002, MIND, V111, P75; Murray C.D., 2000, SOLAR SYSTEM DYNAMIC; Putnam Hilary, 1979, MATH MATTER METHOD P, V1; [Anonymous], 1971, PHILOS LOGIC; QUINE W. V., 1981, THEORIES THINGS; Sacks Sheldon, 1978, METAPHOR; Walton Kendall, 1993, EUR J PHILOS, V1, P39; Yablo S, 1998, ARIST SOC P, V72, P229, DOI 10.1111/1467-8349.00044 ; Stephen Yablo, 2002, PHILOS ISSUES, V12, P220","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzq014",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","659AD","WOS:000282538500001",,,,,"2018-01-02",96.0,"azzounij azzounijody bakera balaguerm balaguerm burgessjp carnaprudolf chalmersdaviddavidmanley colyvanm colyvanm colyvanm colyvanm colyvanm colyvanm fieldh kalderonme keeferosanna lengm lengm lyona maddyp maddyp meliaj meliaj murraycd putnamhilary quinewv sackssheldon waltonkendall yablos stephenyablo azzounij","cluster_0"
0.01707320789027884,0.0883817869328175,7.0,41.0,41.0,0.0,0.0,1971.0,80.0,318.0,194.0,211.0,18.0,"J","BENN, SI; WEINSTEIN, WL",,,,"BENN, SI; WEINSTEIN, WL",,,"BEING FREE TO ACT, AND BEING A FREE MAN","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"AUSTRALIAN NATL UNIV,INST ADV STUDIES,CANBERRA,AUSTRALIA; BALLIOL COLL,OXFORD,ENGLAND",,,,,,,"Benn SI, 1967, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V45, P259, DOI [10.1080/00048406712341211, DOI 10.1080/00048406712341211]; CASSINELLI C. W., 1966, FREE ACTIVITIES INTE; HOBBES T, 1840, ENGLISH WORKS, V4, P273; LUCAS JR, 1966, PRINCIPLES POLITICS, P144; MACCALLUM GC, 1967, PHILOS REV, V76, P312, DOI 10.2307/2183622 ; OPPENHEIM FE, 1961, DIMENSIONS FREEDOM, P189; WEINSTEIN WL, 1965, POLIT STUD-LONDON, V13, P145, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1965.tb00361.x","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","Y2292","WOS:A1971Y229200003",,,,,"2018-01-02",97.0,"cassinellicw hobbest lucasjr maccallumgc oppenheimfe weinsteinwl bennsi","cluster_4"
-0.025727039661568432,0.3914474138992499,8.0,41.0,41.0,0.0,2.0,1965.0,74.0,296.0,554.0,562.0,9.0,"J","RUNCIMAN, WG; SEN, AK",,,,"RUNCIMAN, WG; SEN, AK",,,"GAMES, JUSTICE AND THE GENERAL WILL","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"ARROW KJ, 1951, SOCIAL CHOICE INDIVI, P82; BARKER, 1947, SOCIAL CONTRACT; BARRY BM, 1961, ANALYSIS, V31, P86; BENN SI, 1959, SOCIAL PRINCIPLES DE, P227; RAWLS J, 1958, PHILOS REV, V67, P164, DOI 10.2307/2182612 ; RUNCIMAN WG, 1962, PHILOS POLITICS SOC, P35; SEN AK, 1961, ECON J, V71, P487; TUCKER AW, 1957, GAMES DECISIONS, P94","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","CCP61","WOS:A1965CCP6100006",,,,,"2018-01-02",98.0,"barker barrybm bennsi rawlsj runcimanwg senak tuckeraw arrowkj","cluster_4"
-0.9013682963464407,-0.8018451620938549,34.0,40.0,40.0,0.0,4.0,2008.0,117.0,468.0,795.0,841.0,47.0,"J","Choi, S",,,,"Choi, Sungho",,,"Dispositional Properties and Counterfactual Conditionals","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"SEMANTICS; ANTIDOTES; REALISM","For the last several decades, dispositional properties have been one of the main topics in metaphysics. Still, however, there is little agreement among contemporary metaphysicians on the nature of dispositional properties. Apparently, though, the majority of them have reached the consensus that dispositional ascriptions cannot be analysed in terms of simple counterfactual conditionals. In this paper it will be argued that this consensus is wrong. Specifically, I will argue that the simple conditional analysis of dispositions, which is generally thought to be dead, is in fact an adequate analysis of dispositions. I will go on to discuss Mumford's view of dispositions from the perspective of the simple conditional analysis of dispositions.","Kyung Hee Univ, Dept Philosophy, Seoul 130701, South Korea","Choi, S (reprint author), Kyung Hee Univ, Dept Philosophy, Seoul 130701, South Korea.",,,,,,"ARMSTRONG D, 1973, BELIEF TRUTH KNOWLED; Armstrong D.M., 1997, WORLD STATES AFFAIRS; BENNETT J., 2003, PHILOS GUIDE CONDITI; Bird A, 1998, PHILOS QUART, V48, P227, DOI 10.1111/1467-9213.00098 ; CARROLL J, 2001, PHILOS REV, V100, P82; Choi S, 2006, SYNTHESE, V148, P369, DOI 10.1007/s11229-004-6229-z; Choi S, 2005, PHILOS QUART, V55, P495, DOI 10.1111/j.0031-8094.2005.00413.x ; Choi S, 2005, PHILOS STUD, V122, P183, DOI 10.1007/s11098-004-1253-x ; Choi S, 2003, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V81, P573, DOI 10.1080/713659764 ; CHOI S, PHILOS PHEN IN PRESS; Cross T, 2005, SYNTHESE, V144, P321, DOI 10.1007/s11229-005-5857-2 ; ELLIS B, 1994, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V72, P27, DOI 10.1080/00048409412345861 ; Fara M, 2005, NOUS, V39, P43, DOI 10.1111/j.0029-4624.2005.00493.x ; Fodor J, 2004, MIND LANG, V19, P29, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2004.00245.x ; Gundersen L, 2002, SYNTHESE, V130, P389, DOI 10.1023/A:1014845625688 ; Gundersen LB, 2004, PAC PHILOS QUART, V85, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0114.2004.00184.x ; Hawthorne J, 2005, NOUS, V39, P179, DOI 10.1111/j.0029-4624.2005.00499.x ; LEWIS D, 1983, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V61, P343, DOI 10.1080/00048408312341131 ; Lewis D, 1997, PHILOS QUART, V47, P143, DOI 10.1111/1467-9213.00052 ; Lewis D., 1973, COUNTERFACTUALS; LILLEHAMMER H, 2003, REAL METAPHYSICS ESS, P154; Malzkorn W, 2000, PHILOS QUART, V50, P452, DOI 10.1111/1467-9213.00199 ; MARTIN CB, 1994, PHILOS QUART, V44, P1, DOI 10.2307/2220143 ; McKitrick J, 2003, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V81, P155, DOI 10.1080/713659629 ; Mellor DH, 2000, MIND, V109, P757, DOI 10.1093/mind/109.436.757 ; Mellor Hugh, 1974, PHILOS REV, V83, P157; Molnar G, 1999, PHILOS QUART, V49, P1, DOI 10.1111/1467-9213.00125 ; Mumford S, 2001, PHILOS QUART, V51, P375, DOI 10.1111/1467-9213.00235 ; Peacocke C, 2004, MIND LANG, V19, P85, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2004.00249.x ; PRIOR EW, 1982, AM PHILOS QUART, V19, P251; Prior E. W., 1985, DISPOSITIONS; RYDER DMS, DISPOSITIONAL CATEGO; SMITH AD, 1977, MIND, V86, P439; Weiskopf DA, 2004, MIND LANG, V19, P48, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2004.00246.x","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzn054",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","400HP","WOS:000262858900003",,,,,"2018-01-02",99.0,"armstrongdm bennettj birda carrollj chois chois chois chois chois crosst ellisb faram fodorj gundersenl gundersenlb hawthornej lewisd lewisd lewisd lillehammerh malzkornw martincb mckitrickj mellordh mellorhugh molnarg mumfords peacockec priorew priorew ryderdms smithad weiskopfda armstrongd","cluster_3"
-0.0736084601749926,-0.030934141142161847,19.0,40.0,40.0,0.0,3.0,2000.0,109.0,436.0,685.0,719.0,35.0,"J","Bovens, L; Olsson, EJ",,,,"Bovens, L; Olsson, EJ",,,"Coherentism, reliability and Bayesian networks","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"INDEPENDENCE","The coherentist theory of justification provides a response to the sceptical challenge: even though the independent processes by which we gather information about the world may be of dubious quality, the internal coherence of the information provides the justification for our empirical beliefs. This central canon of the coherence theory of justification is tested within the framework of Bayesian networks, which is a theory of probabilistic reasoning in artificial intelligence. We interpret the independence of the information gathering processes (IGPs) in terms of conditional independences, construct a minimal sufficient condition for a coherence ranking of information sets and assess whether the confidence boost that results from receiving information through independent IGPs is indeed a positive function of the coherence of the information set. There are multiple interpretations of what constitute IGPs of dubious quality. Do we know our IGPs to be no better than randomization processes? Or, do we know them to be better than randomization processes but not quite fully reliable, and if so, what is the nature of this lack of full reliability? Or, do we not know whether they are fully reliable or not? Within the latter interpretation, does learning something about the quality of some IGPs teach us anything about the quality of the other IGPs? The Bayesian-network models demonstrate that the success of the coherentist canon is contingent on what interpretation one endorses of the claim that our IGPs are of dubious quality.","Univ Colorado, Dept Philosophy, Boulder, CO 80309 USA; Univ Konstanz, Fachgruppe Philosophie, Constance, Germany","Bovens, L (reprint author), Univ Colorado, Dept Philosophy, Boulder, CO 80309 USA.",,,,,,"BENDER JW, 1989, CURRENT STATE COHERE; Bonjour L, 1999, BLACKWELL GUIDE EPIS, P117; BONJOUR L., 1985, STRUCTURE EMPIRICAL; BOVENS L, 2000, P 8TH INT WORKSHOP N; BOVENS L, 2000, IN PRESS SOLVING RID; DAWID AP, 1979, J ROY STAT SOC B MET, V41, P1; Ewing A. C., 1934, IDEALISM CRITICAL SU; Greco J., 1999, BLACKWELL GUIDE EPIS; Huemer M, 1997, SOUTHERN J PHILOS, V35, P463, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-6962.1997.tb00848.x ; Lewis C. I., 1946, ANAL KNOWLEDGE VALUA; Neapolitan R, 1990, PROBABILISTIC REASON; OLSSON EJ, 2000, IN PRESS COHERENCE T; Pearl J., 1988, PROBABILISTIC REASON; Pearl J., 2000, CAUSALITY; Quine Willard Van Orman, 1960, WORD OBJECT; SPOHN W, 1980, J PHILOS LOGIC, V9, P73, DOI 10.1007/BF00258078 ; Swain M., 1989, CURRENT STATE COHERE, P115; VERMA T, 1988, P 4TH AAAI WORKSHOP; Verma T., 1990, P 6 C UNC ART INT, P220","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/109.436.685",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","375LV","WOS:000165401700001",,,,,"2018-01-02",100.0,"bonjourl bonjourl bovensl bovensl dawidap ewingac grecoj huemerm lewisci neapolitanr olssonej pearlj pearlj quinewillardvanorman spohnw swainm vermat vermat benderjw","cluster_0"
-1.6243920858202034,-1.4868306867510008,63.0,40.0,40.0,0.0,0.0,2000.0,109.0,436.0,757.0,780.0,24.0,"J","Mellor, DH",,,,"Mellor, DH",,,"The semantics and ontology of dispositions","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"CONJUNCTIVE UNIVERSALS; LAWS","The paper looks at the semantics and ontology of dispositions in the light of recent work on the subject. Objections to the simple conditionals apparently entailed by disposition statements are met by replacing them with so-called 'reduction sentences' and some implications of this are explored. The usual distinction between categorical and dispositional properties is criticised and the relation between dispositions and their bases examined. Applying this discussion to two typical cases leads to the conclusion that fragility is not a real property and that, while both temperature and its bases are, this does not generate any problem of overdetermination.","Univ Cambridge Darwin Coll, Cambridge CB3 9EU, England","Mellor, DH (reprint author), Univ Cambridge Darwin Coll, Cambridge CB3 9EU, England.",,,,,,"Armstrong David, 1983, WHAT IS LAW NATURE; ARMSTRONG D, 1973, BELIEF TRUTH KNOWLED; Armstrong D.M, 1978, UNIVERSALS SCI REALI; Armstrong D. M., 1989, COMBINATORIAL THEORY; Armstrong D. M., 1996, DISPOSITIONS DEBATE; ARMSTRONG D. M., 1993, WORLD STATES AFFAIRS; Ayer A. J., 1963, CONCEPT PERSON OTHER; AYER AJ, 1956, WHAT IS LAW NATURE; Bird A, 1998, PHILOS QUART, V48, P227, DOI 10.1111/1467-9213.00098 ; Carnap R., 1953, READINGS PHILOS SCI, P47; CRANE T, 1991, MATTERS METAPHYSICS, P82; Davidson Donald, 1969, ESSAYS HONOR CG HEMP, P216, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-1466-2_11; DAVIDSON D, 1980, ESSAYS ACTIONS EVENT; DENBIGH K, 1955, PRINCIPLES CHEM EQUI; Dretske F., 1977, PHILOS SCI, V44, P246; EHRING D, 1985, ERKENNTNIS, V23, P243; Feigl Herbert, 1953, READINGS PHILOS SCI; FOX JF, 1987, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V65, P188, DOI 10.1080/00048408712342871 ; Goodman N., 1965, FACT FICTION FORECAS; HARRE R, 1970, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V21, P81, DOI 10.1093/bjps/21.1.81 ; Hempel C. G., 1965, ASPECTS SCI EXPLANAT; Huttemann A, 1998, PHILOS SCI, V65, P121, DOI 10.1086/392629 ; KORNER S, 1957, OBSERVATIONS INTERPR; Kripke Saul A., 1971, IDENTITY INDIVIDUATI, P135; Kripke Saul Aaron, 1982, WITTGENSTEIN RULES P; LEVI I, 1964, AM PHILOS QUART, V1, P221; Lewis D, 1997, PHILOS QUART, V47, P143, DOI 10.1111/1467-9213.00052 ; Lewis D., 1986, PLURALITY WORLDS; Lewis D., 1973, COUNTERFACTUALS; Lewis David, 1989, ARISTOTELIAN SOC SUP, V63, P113; Lewis D. K., 1969, CONVENTION PHILOS ST; Lipton P, 1999, PHILOSOPHY, V74, P155, DOI 10.1017/S0031819199000236 ; LOWE EJ, 1989, KINDS BEING; Mackie J. L., 1972, TRUTH PROBABILITY PA; MARTIN CB, 1994, PHILOS QUART, V44, P1, DOI 10.2307/2220143 ; MELLOR DH, 1993, J PHILOS, V90, P233, DOI 10.2307/2940911 ; MELLOR DH, 1992, ANALYSIS, V52, P97; Mellor D. H., 1991, MATTERS METAPHYSICS; Mellor D.H., 1997, PROPERTIES; Mellor D. H., 1995, FACTS CAUSATION; Mellor D. H., 1971, MATTER CHANCE; MULLIGAN K, 1984, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V44, P287, DOI 10.2307/2107686 ; Mumford S, 1998, DISPOSITIONS; MUNITZ MK, 1971, IDENTITY INDIVIDUATI; OLIVER A, 1992, ANALYSIS, V52, P88, DOI 10.2307/3328277 ; PEACOCKE CAB, 1979, HOLISTIC EXPLANATION; Popper K. R., 1990, WORLD PROPENSITIES; Popper K. R, 1957, OBSERVATION INTERPRE, p[65, 88]; PRIOR EW, 1982, AM PHILOS QUART, V19, P251; QUINE WV, 1953, FROM LOGICAL POINT V; RAMSEY FP, 1929, PHILOSOPHY; RESCHER N, 1969, ESSAYS HONOR CG HEMP; RESTALL G, 1996, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V74, P331, DOI 10.1080/00048409612347331 ; Ryle G., 1949, CONCEPT MIND; Shoemaker S., 1980, TIME CAUSE, P109; Smith P., 1986, PHILOS MIND INTRO; TOOLEY M, 1977, CAN J PHILOS, V7, P667; Tuomela R., 1978, DISPOSITIONS; van Inwagen Peter, 1980, TIME CAUSE; WEINTRAUB R, 1987, RATIO, V29, P148; WILLIAMS D. C., 1966, PRINCIPLES EMPIRICAL; Wittgenstein L., PHILOS INVESTIGATION; Zemansky M. W., 1957, HEAT THERMODYNAMICS","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/109.436.757",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","375LV","WOS:000165401700003",,,,,"2018-01-02",101.0,"armstrongd armstrongdm armstrongdm armstrongdm armstrongdm ayeraj ayeraj birda carnapr cranet davidsondonald davidsond denbighk dretskef ehringd feiglherbert foxjf goodmann harrer hempelcg huttemanna korners kripkesaula kripkesaulaaron levii lewisd lewisd lewisd lewisdavid lewisdk liptonp loweej mackiejl martincb mellordh mellordh mellordh mellordh mellordh mellordh mulligank mumfords munitzmk olivera peacockecab popperkr popperkr priorew quinewv ramseyfp reschern restallg ryleg shoemakers smithp tooleym tuomelar vaninwagenpeter weintraubr williamsdc wittgensteinl zemanskymw armstrongdavid","cluster_3"
-0.8568274782759882,-0.3555004848930011,35.0,40.0,40.0,0.0,0.0,1995.0,104.0,415.0,533.0,565.0,33.0,"J","WILLIAMSON, T",,,,"WILLIAMSON, T",,,"IS KNOWING A STATE OF MIND","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"WILLIAMSON, T (reprint author), UNIV EDINBURGH,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,EDINBURGH EH8 9YL,MIDLOTHIAN,SCOTLAND.",,,,,,"ARMSTRONG D, 1973, BELIEF TRUTH KNOWLED; AUSTIN JL, 1946, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V20, P48; Burge T., 1986, SUBJECT THOUGHT CONT; CHILD TW, 1994, CAUSALITY INTERPRETA; Craig E., 1990, KNOWLEDGE STATE NATU; Dancy J, 1988, PERCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE; DANCY J, 1992, COMPANION EPISTEMOLO; Evans G., 1982, VARIETIES REFERENCE; GETTIER E. L., 1963, ANALYSIS, V23, P121, DOI DOI 10.1093/ANALYS/23.6.121; Grice H. P., 1989, STUDIES WAY WORDS; Hintikka J., 1962, KNOWLEDGE BELIEF; HINTON J.M., 1973, EXPERIENCES; HINTON JM, 1967, MIND, V85, P217; HUMBERSTONE IL, 1988, DIALECTICA, V42, P183, DOI 10.1111/j.1746-8361.1988.tb00914.x ; Kim Jaegwon, 1993, SUPERVENIENCE MIND; McDowell John, 1982, P BRIT ACAD, V68, P455; Peacocke C., 1992, STUDY CONCEPTS; Perner J., 1993, UNDERSTANDING REPRES; PETTIT P, 1986, SUBJECT THOUGHT CONC; Prichard Harold A., 1950, KNOWLEDGE PERCEPTION; Putnam H., 1973, J PHILOS, V70, P699, DOI DOI 10.2307/2025079; Radford C., 1966, ANALYSIS, V27, P1; Russell B, 1910, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V11, P108; Salmon Nathan U., 1988, PROPOSITIONS ATTITUD; Shope R. K., 1983, ANAL KNOWING; Smith M., 1994, MORAL PROBLEM; SNOWDON P, 1980, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V81, P175; Snowdon P., 1990, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V64, P121; STEUP M, 1992, COMPANION EPISTEMOLO; STICH SP, 1978, MONIST, V61, P573, DOI 10.5840/monist197861446 ; Unger P, 1975, IGNORANCE CASE SKEPT; Vendler Zeno, 1967, LINGUISTICS PHILOS; Vendler Z., 1972, RES COGITANS; Williams B, 1978, DESCARTES PROJECT PU; WILLIAMSON T, 1992, MIND, V101, P217, DOI 10.1093/mind/101.402.217","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/104.415.533",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","RJ564","WOS:A1995RJ56400005",,,,,"2018-01-02",102.0,"austinjl burget childtw craige dancyj dancyj evansg gettierel gricehp hintikkaj hintonjm hintonjm humberstoneil kimjaegwon mcdowelljohn peacockec pernerj pettitp prichardharolda putnamh radfordc russellb salmonnathanu shoperk smithm snowdonp snowdonp steupm stichsp ungerp vendlerzeno vendlerz williamsb williamsont armstrongd","cluster_0"
-0.09289454685575027,0.16030786191453783,12.0,40.0,40.0,0.0,0.0,1985.0,94.0,374.0,218.0,230.0,13.0,"J","COTTINGHAM, J",,,,"COTTINGHAM, J",,,"CARTESIAN TRIALISM","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"COTTINGHAM, J (reprint author), UNIV READING,READING RG6 2AH,BERKS,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"COTTINGHAM J, 1976, PHILOSOPHY, V53; CRESS DA, 1979, R DESCARTES MEDITATI; Descartes R., DISCOURSE METHOD; Descartes Rene, 1644, PRINCIPES PHILOS; DESCARTES R, MEDITATIONS; DESCARTES R, TRAITE HOMME; HALDANE ES, 1911, PHILOS WORKS DESCART, V1, P153; Kenny A., 1970, DESCARTES PHILOS LET; KRIPKE SA, 1980, NAMING NECESSITY NAT; SEARLE JR, 1982, MINDS, V1; VEITCH J, 1912, DESCARTES DISCOURSE; Williams B, 1978, DESCARTES PROJECT PU","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","AGR44","WOS:A1985AGR4400004",,,,,"2018-01-02",103.0,"cressda descartesr descartesrene descartesr descartesr haldanees kennya kripkesa searlejr veitchj williamsb cottinghamj","cluster_6"
0.019579007790242735,0.040799878577809055,10.0,40.0,41.0,0.0,1.0,1958.0,67.0,267.0,317.0,334.0,18.0,"J","KENNICK, WE",,,,"KENNICK, WE",,,"DOES TRADITIONAL AESTHETICS REST ON A MISTAKE","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"Hampshire Stuart, 1954, AESTHETICS LANGUAGE, P161; KNIGHT H, 1954, AESTHETICS LANGUAGE, P147; KRISTELLER Paul Oskar, 1951, J HIST IDEAS, V13, P17, DOI DOI 10.2307/2707724; Kristeller Paul O., 1951, J HIST IDEAS, V12, P496, DOI DOI 10.2307/2707484; LEAVIS FR, 1936, REVALUATION TRADITIO, P125; MUNRO T, 1949, ARTS THEIR INTERRELA, P108; OSBORNE H, 1955, AESTHETICS CRITICISM; PARKER DH, 1939, REV INT PHILOSOPHIE, P684; STECHOW W, 1953, JAAC, V11, P325; WAISMANN F, 1950, ANALYSIS, V11, P27","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","CCP45","WOS:A1958CCP4500003",,,,,"2018-01-02",104.0,"knighth kristellerpauloskar kristellerpaulo leavisfr munrot osborneh parkerdh stechoww waismannf hampshirestuart","cluster_0"
-0.38368150649290544,-0.13174654846855108,7.0,39.0,39.0,0.0,1.0,1994.0,103.0,412.0,491.0,503.0,13.0,"J","THAU, M",,,,"THAU, M",,,"UNDERMINING AND ADMISSIBILITY","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"THAU, M (reprint author), PRINCETON UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,PRINCETON,NJ 08544, USA.",,,,,,"Burgess J., 1983, NOTRE DAME J FORM L, V24, P93; DARWALL S, 1992, PHILOS REV, V101, P115, DOI 10.2307/2185045 ; HALL N, 1994, MIND, V103, P505, DOI 10.1093/mind/103.412.505 ; Hart H. L. A., 1961, CONCEPT LAW; LEWIS D, 1994, MIND, V103, P473, DOI 10.1093/mind/103.412.473 ; LEWIS D, 1986, PHILOS PAPER, V2; LEWIS D, 1980, STUDIES INTERACTIVE, V2","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/103.412.491",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","PM104","WOS:A1994PM10400006",,,,,"2018-01-02",105.0,"darwalls halln harthla lewisd lewisd lewisd burgessj","cluster_3"
-0.6412673017351386,-0.5766476126524966,45.0,39.0,40.0,0.0,1.0,1992.0,101.0,402.0,243.0,259.0,17.0,"J","STICH, S",,,,"STICH, S",,,"WHAT IS A THEORY OF MENTAL REPRESENTATION","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"RUTGERS STATE UNIV,CTR COGNIT SCI,NEW BRUNSWICK,NJ 08903","STICH, S (reprint author), RUTGERS STATE UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,NEW BRUNSWICK,NJ 08903, USA.",,,,,,"BARSALOU LW, 1987, CONCEPTS CONCEPTUAL; BLOCK N, 1986, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V10, P615; Burge T., 1979, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V4, P73; Cummins R., 1989, MEANING MENTAL REPRE; Devitt Michael, 1990, MIND COGNITION, P371; Devitt M., 1987, LANGUAGE REALITY INT; DRETSKE F, 1988, EXPLAINING BEHAVIOR; FIELD H, 1986, PHILOS SCI, V53, P425, DOI 10.1086/289328 ; FIELD H, 1986, PHILOS SCI, V53, P444; FIELD HH, 1977, J PHILOS, V74, P379; FODOR J, 1990, THEORY CONTENT OTHER, P52; FODOR J, 1987, PSYCHOSEMANTICS, P98; Fodor Jerry, 1981, READINGS PHILOS PSYC, V2, P197; Fodor J. A., 1990, MIND COGNITION, P312; FRY DB, 1979, PHYSICS SPEECH; Giere R. N., 1988, EXPLAINING SCI COGNI; GLYMOUR C, 1986, DISCOVERING CAUSAL S; Goldman A. I., 1989, MIND LANG, V4, P161, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-0017.1989.TB00249.X; HARMAN G, 1986, REPRESENTATION KNOWL; JONES T, 1991, MIND LANGUAGE, V6, P58; Langley P., 1987, SCI DISCOVERY COMPUT; Loar B., 1981, MIND MEANING; LOEWER B, 1987, SYNTHESE, V70, P287, DOI 10.1007/BF00413940 ; LYCAN W, 1988, JUDGMENT JUSTIFICATI, P4; McCloskey M., 1983, MENTAL MODELS; MCCLOSKEY M, 1980, SCIENCE, P210; McGinn C., 1982, THOUGHT OBJECT, P207; Millikan R. G., 1984, LANGUAGE THOUGHT OTH; MURDOCK GP, 1980, THEORIES ILLNESS; MURPGHY G, 1985, PSYCHOL REV, V92; NERSESSIAN N, 1991, COGNITIVE MODELS SCI, V15; Papineau D., 1987, REALITY REPRESENTATI; PICKETT J. M, 1980, SOUNDS SPEECH COMMUN; Ramsey W., 1990, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V4, P499; RIPS L, 1989, SIMILARITY ANALOGY T; SKLAR L, 1974, SPACE TIME SPACE TIM; Smith Edward, 1981, CATEGORIES CONCEPTS; Sober E., 1984, NATURE SELECTION; STACK M, 1980, UNPUB ANN M SOC PHIL; STICH S, 1991, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V65, P229; Stich S., 1983, FOLK PSYCHOL COGNITI; STICH S, IN PRESS MIND LANGUA; STICH S, UNPUB INTENTIONALITY; STICH SP, 1978, MONIST, V61, P573, DOI 10.5840/monist197861446 ; Thagard P. R., 1988, COMPUTATIONAL PHILOS","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/101.402.243",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","HV861","WOS:A1992HV86100002",,,,,"2018-01-02",106.0,"blockn burget cumminsr devittmichael devittm dretskef fieldh fieldh fieldhh fodorj fodorj fodorjerry fodorja frydb gierern glymourc goldmanai harmang jonest langleyp loarb loewerb lycanw mccloskeym mccloskeym mcginnc millikanrg murdockgp murpghyg nersessiann papineaud pickettjm ramseyw ripsl sklarl smithedward sobere stackm stichs stichs stichs stichs stichsp thagardpr barsaloulw","cluster_0"
-0.43652171929236566,-0.11107911601042798,23.0,39.0,40.0,0.0,0.0,1992.0,101.0,402.0,217.0,242.0,26.0,"J","WILLIAMSON, T",,,,"WILLIAMSON, T",,,"INEXACT KNOWLEDGE","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"WILLIAMSON, T (reprint author), UNIV COLL OXFORD,OXFORD OX1 4BH,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"BACHARACH M, 1992, IN PRESS SYNTHESE, V91; BACHARACH MO, 1992, KNOWLEDGE BELIEF STR; Bicchieri Christina, 1989, ERKENNTNIS, V30, P69; Bicchieri C., 1992, KNOWLEDGE BELIEF STR; CAMPBELL R, 1974, PHILOS STUD, V26, P75; CARGILE J, 1969, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V20, P193, DOI 10.1093/bjps/20.3.193 ; Chellas B., 1980, MODAL LOGIC INTRO; Davis J. W., 1969, PHILOS LOGIC; HARRISON C, 1969, PHILOS LOGIC, P74; Horwich P., 1990, TRUTH; Jackson F., 1987, CONDITIONALS; JANAWAY C, 1989, MIND, V98, P391; Kaplan D., 1960, NOTRE DAME J FORM L, V1, P79; MCLELLAND J, 1975, J PHILOS LOGIC, V4, P71; NOZICK R, 1981, PHILOS EXPLANATIONS; PETTIT P, 1989, J PHILOS, V86, P169, DOI 10.2307/2026960 ; SAINSBURY M, 1988, PARADOXES; SHAW R, 1958, MIND, V67, P382; Sorensen R. A., 1988, BLINDSPOTS; Williamson T., 1990, IDENTITY DISCRIMINAT; WILLIAMSON T, 1992, IN PRESS NOTRE DAME, V33; WILLIAMSON T, 1992, IN PRESS ARISTOTELIA, V66; WRIGHT C, 1977, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V55, P41, DOI 10.1080/00048407712341031","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/101.402.217",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","HV861","WOS:A1992HV86100001",,,,,"2018-01-02",107.0,"bacharachmo bicchierichristina bicchieric campbellr cargilej chellasb davisjw harrisonc horwichp jacksonf janawayc kapland mclellandj nozickr pettitp sainsburym shawr sorensenra williamsont williamsont williamsont wrightc bacharachm","cluster_0"
-0.5471743294109384,-0.49200572329512227,20.0,39.0,39.0,0.0,0.0,1991.0,100.0,400.0,461.0,484.0,24.0,"J","DAVIES, M",,,,"DAVIES, M",,,"INDIVIDUALISM AND PERCEPTUAL CONTENT","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"DAVIES, M (reprint author), UNIV LONDON BIRKBECK COLL,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,MALET ST,LONDON WC1E 7HX,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"BURGE T, 1986, PHILOS REV, V95, P3, DOI 10.2307/2185131 ; BURGE T, 1988, CONTENTS THOUGHT, P62; BURGE T, 1988, CONTENTS THOUGHT, P86; Burge T., 1979, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V4, P73; DAVIES M, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V92; DAVIES M, 1986, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V60, P263; DRETSKE F, 1986, BELIEF, P129; EGAN F, 1991, PHILOS REV, V100, P179, DOI 10.2307/2185299 ; Evans G., 1982, VARIETIES REFERENCE; Fodor Jerry, 1986, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V60, P235; Fodor J., 1987, PSYCHOSEMANTICS; JACKSON F, 1988, MIND, V97, P381; MATTHEWS RJ, 1988, CONTENTS THOUGHT, P77; McGinn C., 1989, MENTAL CONTENT; McGinn C., 1982, THOUGHT OBJECT, P207; Peacocke C., 1989, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, P1; Peacocke Ch., 1983, SENSE AND CONTENT; Hilary Putnam, 1985, PHILOS PAPERS, V2, P215, DOI DOI 10.1017/CB09780511625251.014; SEGAL G, 1989, PHILOS REV, V98, P189, DOI 10.2307/2185282 ; SMOLENSKY P, 1990, INTELLECTICA, P127","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","GL556","WOS:A1991GL55600003",,,,,"2018-01-02",108.0,"burget burget burget daviesm daviesm dretskef eganf evansg fodorjerry fodorj jacksonf matthewsrj mcginnc mcginnc peacockec peacockech hilaryputnam segalg smolenskyp burget","cluster_0"
-0.19392065803089076,0.2091470628783884,28.0,38.0,38.0,0.0,2.0,2010.0,119.0,476.0,953.0,997.0,45.0,"J","Enoch, D",,,,"Enoch, David",,,"Not Just a Truthometer: Taking Oneself Seriously (but not Too Seriously) in Cases of Peer Disagreement","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"How should you update your (degrees of) belief about a proposition when you find out that someone else as reliable as you are in these matters disagrees with you about its truth value? There are now several different answers to this question the question of 'peer disagreement' in the literature, but none, I think, is plausible. Even more importantly, none of the answers in the literature places the peer-disagreement debate in its natural place among the most general traditional concerns of normative epistemology. In this paper I try to do better. I start by emphasizing how we cannot and should not treat ourselves as 'truthometers' merely devices with a certain probability of tracking the truth. I argue that the truthometer view is the main motivation for the Equal Weight View in the context of peer disagreement. With this fact in mind, the discussion of peer disagreement becomes more complicated, sensitive to the justification of the relevant background degrees of belief (including the conditional ones), and to some of the most general points that arise in the context of discussions of scepticism. I argue that thus understood, peer disagreement is less special as an epistemic phenomenon than may be thought, and so that there is very little by way of positive theory that we can give about peer disagreement in general.","Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, IL-91905 Jerusalem, Israel","Enoch, D (reprint author), Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, IL-91905 Jerusalem, Israel.","denoch@mscc.huji.ac.il",,,,,"Antony Louise, 2007, PHILOS GODS MEDITATI; Bogardus T, 2009, EPISTEME-J INDIV SOC, V6, P324, DOI 10.3366/E1742360009000744; Christensen D, 2007, PHILOS REV, V116, P187, DOI 10.1215/00318108-2006-035; Cohen S, 2002, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V65, P309, DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2002.tb00204.x ; Conee E, 2009, EPISTEME-J INDIV SOC, V6, P313, DOI 10.3366/E1742360009000732; Elga A, 2007, NOUS, V41, P478, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2007.00656.x ; Enoch David, 2009, J ETHICS, V13, P15, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10892-008-9041-Z; ENOCH D, 2010, OXFORD STUDIES METAE, V5, P111; Enoch D, 2008, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V76, P547, DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2008.00157.x ; Enoch D, 2007, LEG THEOR, V13, P69, DOI 10.1017/S1352325207070048; Feldman R., DISAGREEMEN IN PRESS; Foley R, 2001, INTELLECTUAL TRUST O; Frances B., PHILOS PHEN IN PRESS; HAWTHORNE J, 2005, OXFORD STUDIES EPIST, V1; Hetherington S., 2006, EPISTEMOLOGY FUTURES; KELLY T, 2009, EPISTEME, V6, P294; LUPER S, 2003, SCEPTICS CONT ESSAYS; Nagel T., 1986, VIEW NOWHERE; Raz Joseph, 1998, AM J JURISPRUDENCE, V43, P25; Roush S, 2009, EPISTEME-J INDIV SOC, V6, P251, DOI 10.3366/E1742360009000690; Schroeder Mark, 2007, SLAVES PASSIONS; SCHROEDER M, 2004, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V18, P337; Schroeder M, 2008, PHILOS STUD, V139, P57, DOI 10.1007/s11098-007-9102-3; TALBOTT W., 2008, STANFORD ENCY PHILOS; Vogel J, 2008, J PHILOS, V105, P518, DOI 10.5840/jphil2008105931 ; WEATHERSON BMS, DISAGREEING DISAGREE; WHITE R, 2005, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V19, P445, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1520-8583.2005.00069.X; White R, 2009, EPISTEME-J INDIV SOC, V6, P233, DOI 10.3366/E1742360009000689","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzq070",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","748FP","WOS:000289375700004",,"gold",,,"2018-01-02",109.0,"bogardust christensend cohens coneee elgaa enochdavid enochd enochd enochd feldmanr foleyr francesb hawthornej hetheringtons kellyt lupers nagelt razjoseph roushs schroedermark schroederm schroederm talbottw vogelj weathersonbms whiter whiter antonylouise","cluster_6"
-0.2077363056916069,-0.1794047935418752,37.0,38.0,38.0,0.0,0.0,1998.0,107.0,425.0,137.0,155.0,19.0,"J","Sorensen, RA",,,,"Sorensen, RA",,,"Yablo's paradox and kindred infinite liars","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"EPISTEMIC PARADOX; SELF-REFERENCE",,"NYU, Dept Philosophy, New York, NY 10003 USA","Sorensen, RA (reprint author), NYU, Dept Philosophy, New York, NY 10003 USA.","sorensen@is2.nyu.edu",,,,,"ANDERSON CA, 1983, J PHILOS, V80, P338, DOI 10.2307/2026335 ; BURGE T, 1978, PHILOS STUD, V34, P21, DOI 10.1007/BF00364686 ; BURGE T, 1984, J PHILOS, V81, P5, DOI 10.2307/2026102 ; BURGE T, 1978, MEANING TRANSLATION, P137; BURGE T, 1981, PHILOS STUD, V41, P353; CHAITIN G, 1986, NEW DIRECTIONS PHILO; CHAITIN GJ, 1970, IEEE T INFORM THEORY, V16, P5, DOI 10.1109/TIT.1970.1054390; Cohen L. Jonathan, 1992, ESSAY BELIEF ACCEPTA; DONNELLAN KS, 1966, PHILOS REV, V75, P281, DOI 10.2307/2183143 ; DRANGE TM, 1994, ANALYSIS, V54, P61; GAIFMAN H, 1992, J PHILOS, V89, P223, DOI 10.2307/2027167 ; GAIFMAN H, 1988, P 2ND C THEORETICAL, P275; GOLDSTEIN L, 1994, ANALYSIS, V54, P223, DOI 10.2307/3328809 ; HARDY J, 1995, ANALYSIS, V55, P197, DOI 10.2307/3328580 ; Harman Gilbert, 1980, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V5, P163; HART WD, 1970, PHILOS REV, V79, P523, DOI 10.2307/2184292 ; Jacquette D, 1996, SYNTHESE, V109, P47, DOI 10.1007/BF00413822 ; Kaplan David, 1989, THEMES KAPLAN, P481; Kaplan David, 1989, THEMES KAPLAN, V1989, P565; KOLMOGOROV AN, 1968, IEEE T INFORM THEORY, V14, P662, DOI 10.1109/TIT.1968.1054210; Koons R. C., 1992, PARADOXES BELIEF STR; LUCAS JR, 1961, PHILOSOPHY, V36, P112, DOI 10.1017/S0031819100057983 ; Makinson David C., 1965, ANALYSIS, V25, P205, DOI DOI 10.1093/ANALYS/25.6.205; Penrose R., 1989, EMPERORS NEW MIND; Priest G, 1997, ANALYSIS, V57, P236, DOI 10.1111/1467-8284.00081 ; PRIEST G, 1995, BEYOND LIMITS THOUGH; Prior A. N., 1961, NOTRE DAME J FORM L, V2, P16, DOI DOI 10.1305/NDJFL/1093956750; READ S, 1979, SYNTHESE, V42, P265, DOI 10.1007/BF00413807 ; ROMANOS GD, 1994, READINGS PHILOS SOCI, P145; Smullyan R., 1994, DIAGONALIZATION SELF; SOLOMONOFF RJ, 1964, INFORM CONTROL, V7, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0019-9958(64)90223-2 ; Sorensen R. A., 1988, BLINDSPOTS; Tarski Alfred, 1944, READINGS PHILOS ANAL; TENNANT N, 1995, ANALYSIS, V55, P199, DOI 10.2307/3328581 ; Visser A., 1989, HDB PHILOS LOGIC, P617; YABLO S, 1985, J PHILOS LOGIC, V14, P297; YABLO S, 1993, ANALYSIS, V53, P251, DOI 10.2307/3328245","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/107.425.137",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","YT694","WOS:000071633700006",,,,,"2018-01-02",110.0,"burget burget burget burget chaiting chaitingj cohenljonathan donnellanks drangetm gaifmanh gaifmanh goldsteinl hardyj harmangilbert hartwd jacquetted kaplandavid kaplandavid kolmogorovan koonsrc lucasjr makinsondavidc penroser priestg priestg prioran reads romanosgd smullyanr solomonoffrj sorensenra tarskialfred tennantn vissera yablos yablos andersonca","cluster_0"
-0.4093689575641169,-0.373139425450895,23.0,38.0,38.0,0.0,0.0,1992.0,101.0,403.0,443.0,459.0,17.0,"J","EGAN, F",,,,"EGAN, F",,,"INDIVIDUALISM, COMPUTATION, AND PERCEPTUAL CONTENT","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"PSYCHOLOGY",,,"EGAN, F (reprint author), RUTGERS STATE UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,NEW BRUNSWICK,NJ 08903, USA.",,,,,,"BLOCK N, 1986, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V10, P615; BURGE T, 1986, PHILOS REV, V95, P3, DOI 10.2307/2185131 ; BURGE T, 1988, CONTENTS THOUGHT, P62; Burge T., 1979, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V4, P73; CHURCHLAND PM, 1981, J PHILOS, V78, P67, DOI 10.2307/2025900 ; Clark Andy, 1989, MICROCOGNITION; Cummins R., 1989, MEANING MENTAL REPRE; DAVIES M, 1991, MIND, V100, P461; Dennett D. C., 1987, INTENTIONAL STANCE, P287; EGAN F, 1991, PHILOS REV, V100, P179, DOI 10.2307/2185299 ; Fodor J., 1987, PSYCHOSEMANTICS; JACKSON F, 1988, MIND, V97, P381; KITCHER P, 1988, PHILOS SCI, V55, P1, DOI 10.1086/289413; KOBES BW, 1990, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V4, P429; MARR D, 1980, PROC R SOC SER B-BIO, V207, P187, DOI 10.1098/rspb.1980.0020; MARR D, 1981, MIND DESIGN, P129; Marr D., 1982, VISION; MATTHEWS R, 1990, 57 RES GROUP MIND BR; SEGAL G, 1989, PHILOS REV, V98, P189, DOI 10.2307/2185282 ; SEGAL G, 1991, MIND, V100, P485; Stich S., 1983, FOLK PSYCHOL COGNITI; Ullman S., 1979, INTERPRETATION VISUA; VANGULICK R, 1989, REPRESENTATIONS, P151","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/101.403.443",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","JG315","WOS:A1992JG31500002",,,,,"2018-01-02",111.0,"burget burget burget churchlandpm clarkandy cumminsr daviesm dennettdc eganf fodorj jacksonf kitcherp kobesbw marrd marrd marrd matthewsr segalg segalg stichs ullmans vangulickr blockn","cluster_0"
0.023358710135790606,0.03221923631765497,4.0,38.0,38.0,0.0,1.0,1964.0,73.0,291.0,374.0,393.0,20.0,"J","BRANDT, RB",,,,"BRANDT, RB",,,"THE CONCEPTS OF OBLIGATION AND DUTY","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"HART, 1961, CONCEPT LAW, P79; Hart's H.L.A., 1955, PHILOS REV, V64, P175; KADING D, 1960, ETHICS, V70, P155, DOI 10.1086/291268 ; Melden A., 1958, ESSAYS MORAL PHILOS","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","CCP57","WOS:A1964CCP5700005",,,,,"2018-01-02",112.0,"hartshla kadingd meldena hart","cluster_6"
-0.9735847245214082,-0.6494823954661844,58.0,37.0,37.0,0.0,2.0,2010.0,119.0,474.0,341.0,376.0,36.0,"J","Schaffer, J",,,,"Schaffer, Jonathan",,,"The Internal Relatedness of All Things","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"The argument from internal relatedness was one of the major nineteenth century neo-Hegelian arguments for monism. This argument has been misunderstood, and may even be sound. The argument, as I reconstruct it, proceeds in two stages: first, it is argued that all things are internally related in ways that render them interdependent; second, the substantial unity of the whole universe is inferred from the interdependence of all of its parts. The guiding idea behind the argument is that failure of free recombination is the modal signature of an integrated monistic cosmos.","Australian Natl Univ, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia","Schaffer, J (reprint author), Australian Natl Univ, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.","jonathan.schaffer@anu.edu.au",,,,,"Armstrong D.M., 1997, WORLD STATES AFFAIRS; AURELIUS M, 1997, MED MEDITATIONS; Barnes Jonathan, 1984, COMPLETE WORKS ARIST; Barnes Jonathan, 1984, COMPLETE WORKS ARIST, V2; BAYLIS C, 1929, J PHILOS, V26, P373; Bird Alexander, 2007, NATURES METAPHYSICS; Blanshard B., 1939, NATURE THOUGHT; Blanshard Brand, 1962, REASON ANAL; BOSANQUET B, 1911, LOGIC MORPHOLOGY KNO, V2; Bradley F. H, 1897, APPEARANCE REALITY M; Bradley F. H., 1935, COLLECTED ESSAYS; Bricker P., 2006, OXFORD STUDIES METAP, V2, P251; Campbell K., 1990, ABSTRACT PARTICULARS; Chalmers David J., 2009, METAMETAPHYSICS; Church Ralph W., 1935, J PHILOS, V32, P264; Cottingham J., 1985, PHILOS WRITINGS DESC, VI-II; Edwards Paul, 1967, ENCY PHILOS, V7; Ellis B., 2001, SCI ESSENTIALISM; Esfeld M, 2008, SYNTHESE, V160, P27, DOI 10.1007/s11229-006-9076-2; EWING AC, 1935, J PHILOS, V32, P273; Ewing A. C., 1934, IDEALISM CRITICAL SU; FINE K, 1995, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V95, P269; Fine K., 1994, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V8, P1, DOI DOI 10.2307/2214160; Gillett C., 2001, PHYS ITS DISCONTENTS; GUTTENPLAN S, 1994, COMPANION PHILOS MIN; Hamilton E., 1961, COLLECTED DIALOGUES; Hegel Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, 1975, HEGELS LOGIC BEING 1; Heil J., 2003, ONTOLOGICAL POINT VI; Hoffman J., 1997, SUBSTANCE ITS NATURE; Hume D., 1748, ENQUIRY HUMAN UNDERS; Joachim H.H., 1901, STUDY ETHICS SPINOZA; Kant I., 1965, CRITIQUE PRACTICAL R; Jefferson Tony, 1996, CRITIQUE PRACTICAL R; Ladyman J., 2007, EVERY THING MUST GO; Lewis D., 1986, PLURALITY WORLDS; LEWIS DK, 1968, J PHILOS, V65, P113, DOI 10.2307/2024555 ; LOAD CEM, 1936, GUIDE PHILOS; Locke J, 1996, ESSAY HUMAN UNDERSTA; Lotze H, 1892, OUTLINES PHILOS RELI; LOWE EJ, 2005, STANFORD ENCY PH FAL; Moore G.E., 1919, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V20, P40; Mumford S, 1998, DISPOSITIONS; MUMFORD S, 2004, LAW NATURE; Plotinus, 1991, ENNEADS; Proclus, 1987, COMMENTARY PLATOS PA; Quine W. V., 1981, THEORIES THINGS, P1; Royce J., 1900, WORLD INDIVIDUAL; SCHAFFER J, 2007, STANFORD ENCY PH FAL; Schaffer J, 2010, PHILOS REV, V119, P31, DOI 10.1215/00318108-2009-025; Schaffer J, 2009, PHILOS STUD, V145, P131, DOI 10.1007/s11098-009-9386-6; Shapiro Stewart, 2000, THINKING MATH PHILOS; Sider T., 2001, 4 DIMENSIONALISM ONT; Simons P., 1987, PARTS STUDY ONTOLOGY; SKOW B, 2005, ONCE SPACETIME; SPINOZA B, 1661, COMMUNICATION; SWOYER C, 1982, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V60, P203, DOI 10.1080/00048408212340641 ; van Inwagen P., 2002, METAPHYSICS; van Inwagen Peter, 1980, TIME CAUSE","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzq033",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","659AD","WOS:000282538500003",,"gold",,,"2018-01-02",113.0,"aureliusm barnesjonathan barnesjonathan baylisc birdalexander blanshardb blanshardbrand bosanquetb bradleyfh bradleyfh brickerp campbellk chalmersdavidj churchralphw cottinghamj edwardspaul ellisb esfeldm ewingac ewingac finek finek gillettc guttenplans hamiltone hegelgeorgwilhelmfriedrich heilj hoffmanj humed joachimhh kanti jeffersontony ladymanj lewisd lewisdk loadcem lockej lotzeh loweej moorege mumfords mumfords plotinus proclus quinewv roycej schafferj schafferj schafferj shapirostewart sidert simonsp skowb spinozab swoyerc vaninwagenp vaninwagenpeter armstrongdm","cluster_3"
-0.5005911495753528,-0.48782688360898774,20.0,37.0,39.0,0.0,2.0,2000.0,109.0,433.0,67.0,79.0,13.0,"J","Read, S",,,,"Read, S",,,"Truthmakers and the disjunction thesis","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"TRUTH","The correspondence theory of truth has experienced something of a revival recently in the form of the Truthmaker Axiom: whatever is true, something makes it true. We consider various postulates which have been proposed to characterize truthmaking, in particular, the Disjunction Thesis (DT), that whatever makes a disjunction true must make one or other disjunct true. In conjunction with certain other assumptions, DT leads to triviality. We show that there are elaborations of truthmaking on which DT holds (which must therefore take steps to avoid the triviality); but that there are more plausible accounts of truthmaking on which DT fails.","Univ St Andrews, Dept Logic & Metaphysics, St Andrews KY16 9AJ, Fife, Scotland","Read, S (reprint author), Univ St Andrews, Dept Logic & Metaphysics, St Andrews KY16 9AJ, Fife, Scotland.",,,,,,"Anderson A. R., 1975, ENTAILMENT LOGIC REL; Armstrong D.M., 1997, WORLD STATES AFFAIRS; BELNAP ND, 1961, ANALYSIS, V22, P30; Bigelow J., 1988, REALITY NUMBERS; COFFA JA, 1975, ENTAILMENT LOGIC REL, P244; DAVIDSON D., 1984, INQUIRIES TRUTH INTE; DUMMETT M, 1959, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V59, P141; Dummett Michael, 1978, TRUTH OTHER ENIGMAS; FOX JF, 1987, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V65, P188, DOI 10.1080/00048408712342871 ; GIRARD JY, 1987, THEORETICAL COMPUTER, V1, P1; MULLIGAN K, 1984, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V44, P287, DOI 10.2307/2107686 ; READ S., 1988, RELEVANT LOGIC; READ S, 1993, LOGIQUE ANAL, V143, P195; RESTALL G, 1996, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V74, P331, DOI 10.1080/00048409612347331 ; SIMONS P, 1987, PARTS; SUNDHOLM G, 1994, TOPOI-INT REV PHILOS, V13, P117, DOI 10.1007/BF00763510 ; TARSKI A, 1936, STUDIA PHILOS, V1, P261; Tarski A, 1956, LOGIC SEMANTICS META, P152; van Dalen D., 1986, HDB PHILOS LOGIC, VIII, P225; VANFRAASSEN BC, 1975, ENTAILMENT LOGIC REL, P221","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/109.433.67",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","282XT","WOS:000085247600004",,,,,"2018-01-02",114.0,"armstrongdm belnapnd bigelowj coffaja davidsond dummettm dummettmichael foxjf girardjy mulligank reads reads restallg simonsp sundholmg tarskia tarskia vandalend vanfraassenbc andersonar","cluster_0"
-1.1482864796550298,-0.9730842050850392,40.0,37.0,37.0,0.0,2.0,1998.0,107.0,426.0,411.0,432.0,22.0,"J","Sturgeon, S",,,,"Sturgeon, S",,,"Physicalism and overdetermination (World view, causality)","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"MENTAL CAUSATION; ESSENCE",,"Univ London Birkbeck Coll, Dept Philosophy, London WC1E 7HX, England","Sturgeon, S (reprint author), Univ London Birkbeck Coll, Dept Philosophy, London WC1E 7HX, England.",,,,,,"ALBERT D, 1988, SYNTHESE, V77, P195, DOI 10.1007/BF00869434 ; ALBERT DZ, 1992, QUANTUM MECHANICS EX; Bennett J.F, 1988, EVENTS THEIR NAMES; chalmers D., 1996, CONSCIOUS MIND; Chisholm R. M., 1970, NOUS, V4, P15; COTTINGHAM L, 1984, PHILOS WRITINGS DESC; Davidson D., 1985, ACTIONS EVENTS; DAVIDSOND, 1980, ESSAYS ACTIONS EVENT; EHRING D, 1997, CAUSATION PERSISTENC; Fodor J., 1987, PSYCHOSEMANTICS; HEALY RA, 1989, PHILOS QUANTUM MECHA; HOPKINS J, 1978, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V52, P221; Hughes R. I. G, 1989, STRUCTURE INTERPRETA; JACKSON F, 1996, MIND, V105, P377, DOI 10.1093/mind/105.419.377 ; JACKSON F, 1982, PHILOS QUART, V32, P127, DOI 10.2307/2960077 ; KIM J, 1997, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V9, P221; Kim J., 1980, ACTION THEORY, P159; Kim Jaegwon, 1993, SUPERVENIENCE MIND; Kim J., 1996, PHILOS MIND; LEPORE E, 1986, ACTIONS EVENTS; Lewis David, 1986, PHILOS PAPERS 2; Lewis D., 1986, PHILOS PAPERS; LEWIS D, 1986, J PHILOS, V70, P445; Loewer Barry, 1995, SUPERVENIENCE; McGinn C., 1982, CHARACTER MIND; Mellor Hugh, 1995, FACTS CAUSATION; PAPINEAU D, 1996, TIMES LIT SUPPLEMENT; Papineau David, 1993, PHILOS NATURALISM; PEACOCKE CAB, 1979, HOLISTIC EXPLANATION; QUINE RVO, 1981, THEORIES THINGS; QUINE WVO, 1985, ACTIONS EVENTS; RAE A, 1996, QUANTUM MECHANICS; Schiffer S., 1987, REMNANTS MEANING; STURGEON S, 1994, J PHILOS, V91, P221, DOI 10.2307/2940751 ; Tye Michael, 1996, 10 PROBLEMS CONSCIOU; VANINWAGEN P, 1978, PHILOS REV, V87, P201, DOI 10.2307/2184752 ; Vendler Zeno, 1967, LINGUISTICS PHILOS; YABLO S, 1992, SYNTHESE, V93, P403, DOI 10.1007/BF01089276 ; YABLO S, 1992, PHILOS REV, V101, P245, DOI 10.2307/2185535 ; YABLO S, 1987, J PHILOS, V84, P293, DOI 10.2307/2026781","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/107.426.411",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","ZJ895","WOS:000073264500007",,,,,"2018-01-02",115.0,"albertdz bennettjf chalmersd chisholmrm cottinghaml davidsond davidsond ehringd fodorj healyra hopkinsj hughesrig jacksonf jacksonf kimj kimj kimjaegwon kimj leporee lewisdavid lewisd lewisd loewerbarry mcginnc mellorhugh papineaud papineaudavid peacockecab quinervo quinewvo raea schiffers sturgeons tyemichael vaninwagenp vendlerzeno yablos yablos yablos albertd","cluster_3"
-0.1149240305580365,0.07498159605221151,4.0,37.0,37.0,1.0,2.0,1981.0,90.0,359.0,386.0,405.0,20.0,"J","WOLF, S",,,,"WOLF, S",,,"THE IMPORTANCE OF FREE WILL","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"WOLF, S (reprint author), HARVARD UNIV,CAMBRIDGE,MA 02138, USA.",,,,,,"Bennett J., 1980, PHILOS SUBJECTS ESSA; Frankfurt H., 1971, J PHILOS, V68, P5, DOI DOI 10.2307/2024717; Strawson P. F., 1968, STUDIES PHILOS THOUG, P71; WATSON G, 1975, J PHILOS, V72, P205, DOI 10.2307/2024703","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","LX072","WOS:A1981LX07200004",,,,,"2018-01-02",116.0,"frankfurth strawsonpf watsong bennettj","cluster_6"
0.027167149118745196,0.02793124632877235,6.0,37.0,37.0,0.0,0.0,1977.0,86.0,343.0,439.0,445.0,7.0,"J","SMITH, AD",,,,"SMITH, AD",,,"DISPOSITIONAL PROPERTIES","MIND",,,"English","Discussion",,,,,,,,,"WADHAM COLL,OXFORD,ENGLAND",,,,,,,"RYLE, 1963, CONCEPT MIND, pCH5; 1974, PHILOSOPHICAL REV, V83, P158; 1961, ANALYSIS, V22; 1968, MATERIALIST THEORY M; 1973, BELIEF TRUTH KNOWLED; 1973, TRUTH PROBABILITY PA, pCH4","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","DN179","WOS:A1977DN17900012",,,,,"2018-01-02",117.0,"ryle","cluster_0"
-0.5888093748323282,-0.4209419252581493,14.0,36.0,36.0,0.0,1.0,1993.0,102.0,405.0,81.0,100.0,20.0,"J","TAYLOR, B",,,,"TAYLOR, B",,,"ON NATURAL PROPERTIES IN METAPHYSICS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"PUTNAM",,,"TAYLOR, B (reprint author), UNIV MELBOURNE,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,PARKVILLE,VIC 3052,AUSTRALIA.",,,,,,"Armstrong D, 1978, UNIVERSALS SCI REALI; Campbell K., 1990, ABSTRACT PARTICULARS; GOODMAN N., 1983, FACT FICTION FORECAS; LEWIS D, 1983, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V61, P343, DOI 10.1080/00048408312341131 ; LEWIS D, 1984, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V62, P221, DOI 10.1080/00048408412340013 ; Lewis D., 1986, PHILOS PAPERS; LEWIS D, 1986, PHILOS PAPERS, P241; Lewis D.K., 1991, PARTS CLASSES; Moore G. E., 1959, PHILOS PAPERS, P32; Quine W., 1969, ONTOLOGICAL RELATIVI, P114; Quinton A., 1957, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V48, P33; TAYLOR B, 1991, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V69, P152, DOI 10.1080/00048409112344601 ; Williams D. C., 1953, REV METAPHYS, V7, P171; Williams D.C., 1953, REV METAPHYS, VVII, p[3, 171]","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/102.405.81",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","KK060","WOS:A1993KK06000004",,,,,"2018-01-02",118.0,"campbellk goodmann lewisd lewisd lewisd lewisd lewisdk moorege quinew quintona taylorb williamsdc williamsdc armstrongd","cluster_3"
0.024986648776904326,0.027416011910346753,2.0,36.0,36.0,0.0,1.0,1987.0,96.0,382.0,256.0,261.0,6.0,"J","WILLIAMSON, T",,,,"WILLIAMSON, T",,,"ON THE PARADOX OF KNOWABILITY","MIND",,,"English","Discussion",,,,,,,,,,"WILLIAMSON, T (reprint author), UNIV DUBLIN TRINITY COLL,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,DUBLIN 2,IRELAND.",,,,,,"SCHLESINGER GN, 1985, RANGE EPISTEMIC LOGI, P103; 1985, MIND, P557","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","H2320","WOS:A1987H232000009",,,,,"2018-01-02",119.0,"schlesingergn","cluster_0"
-1.0838924042147415,-0.9441713695422704,71.0,35.0,35.0,0.0,1.0,2007.0,116.0,463.0,633.0,675.0,43.0,"J","Varzi, AC",,,,"Varzi, Achille C.",,,"Supervaluationism and its logics","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"HIGHER-ORDER VAGUENESS; TRUTH-VALUE GAPS","If we adopt a supervaluational semantics for vagueness, what sort of logic results? As it turns out, the answer depends crucially on how the standard notion of validity as truth preservation is recast. There are several ways of doing this within a supervaluational framework, the main alternative being between 'global' construals (e.g. an argument is valid if and only if it preserves truth-under-all-precisifications) and 'local' construals (an argument is valid if and only if, under all precisifications, it preserves truth). The former alternative is by far more popular, but I argue in favour of the latter, for G) it does not suffer from a number of serious objections, and (ii) it makes it possible to restore global validity as a defined notion.","Columbia Univ, Dept Philosophy, New York, NY 10027 USA","Varzi, AC (reprint author), Columbia Univ, Dept Philosophy, New York, NY 10027 USA.",,,,,,"BATENS D, 2003, FRONTIERS PARACONSIS; Beall JC, 2000, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V78, P475, DOI 10.1080/00048400012349751 ; Beall J. C., 2003, LIARS HEAPS NEW ESSA; BENCIVENGA E, 1978, J PHILOS LOGIC, V7, P389; BOHM C, 1975, LAMDA CALCULAS COMPU; Burns Lynda Claire, 1991, VAGUENESS INVESTIGAT; Carroll L., 1895, MIND, V4, P278, DOI [10.1093/mind/IV.14.278, DOI 10.1093/MIND/IV.14.278]; Colledge D, 2000, J CRIM JUST, V28, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0047-2352(99)00027-6 ; DEVER JN, UNPUB SUPERVALUATION; Dummett Michael, 1991, LOGICAL BASIS METAPH; DUMMETT M, 1996, VAGUENESS READER, P99; Dummett M., 1973, P BRIT ACAD, V59, P201; EDGINGTON D, 1993, ANALYSIS, V53, P193, DOI 10.2307/3328236 ; Enderton H.B., 1972, MATH INTRO LOGIC; Fine Kit, 1975, VAGUENESS READER, V30, p[265, 119]; FODOR JA, 1996, J PHILOS, V93, P516, DOI 10.2307/2940838 ; FREGE GG, 1952, GRUNDGESETZE ARITHME, V2, P21; GRAFF D, 2003, LIARS HEAPS NEW ESSA, P195; Greenough Patrick, 2005, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V79, P167; HAACK S, 1976, MIND, V85, P112; HAJEK P, 2005, P 12 INT C LOND; HECK RG, 1993, ANALYSIS, V53, P201, DOI 10.1093/analys/53.4.201 ; HERZBERGER HG, 1982, TOPOI-INT REV PHILOS, V1, P74, DOI 10.1007/BF00157545 ; Horgan T, 1998, MONIST, V81, P313, DOI 10.5840/monist19988122 ; Hyde D, 1997, MIND, V106, P641, DOI 10.1093/mind/106.424.641 ; HYDE D, 1994, MIND, V103, P35, DOI 10.1093/mind/103.409.35 ; KAMP H, 1975, FORMAL SEMANTICS NAT, P45; Keefe Rosann, 1996, VAGUENESS READER; Keefe Rosanna, 2000, THEORIES VAGUENESS; Keefe R., 2000, PHILOS TOPICS, V28, P93; KEENE SK, 1952, INTRO MATH; KOONS RC, 1994, MIND, V103, P439, DOI 10.1093/mind/103.412.439 ; Kremer P, 2003, J PHILOS LOGIC, V32, P225, DOI 10.1023/A:1024240422978 ; KRIPKE S, 1980, SEMANTICS NATURAL LA; Lewis D., 1986, PLURALITY WORLDS; LEWIS DK, 1975, PHILOS PAPERS, V1, P163; LEWIS DK, 1993, ONTOLOGY CAUSUALITY, P164; MACHINA KF, 1976, VAGUENESS READER, V5, P174; MCGEE V, 1995, SOUTHERN J PHILOS, V33, P203, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-6962.1995.tb00771.x ; McGee V, 1998, LINGUIST PHILOS, V21, P221, DOI 10.1023/A:1005323801696 ; MCGEE V, 1989, J PHILOS, V86, P530, DOI 10.5840/jphil1989861024 ; McGee V., 1991, TRUTH VAGUENESS PARA; MCGEE V, 1999, UNPUB; Mendelson E, 1987, INTRO MATH LOGIC; Morreau M, 1999, J PHILOS, V96, P148, DOI 10.2307/2564661 ; Priest Graham, 2004, LAW NONCONTRADICTION; Przelecki M., 1976, ERKENNTNIS, V10, P371; Rescher N., 1980, LOGIC INCONSISTENCY; Restall G, 2005, P 12 INT C LOG METH, P189; RESTALL G, 1990, VAGUENESS READER, P251; Sanford D. H., 1976, SYNTHESE, V33, P195; SCOTT D, 1975, LAMBDA-CALCULUS COMP, P1; Shapiro S., 2006, VAGUENESS CONTEXT; Sobel J. H., 2004, LOGIC THEISM ARGUMEN; SORENSEN RA, 1985, ANALYSIS, V45, P134, DOI 10.2307/3327138 ; TAPPENDEN J, 1993, J PHILOS, V90, P551, DOI 10.2307/2940846 ; VANFRAASSEN BC, 1966, J PHILOS, V63, P481, DOI 10.2307/2024549 ; Varzi A, 1999, ESSAY UNIVERSAL SEMA; Varzi A. C., 2003, MIND, V112, P295; Varzi AC, 2005, MIND, V114, P695, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzi695; Varzi A. C., 1997, NOTRE DAME J FORM L, V38, P621; Varzi A. C., 2003, LIARS HEAPS NEW ESSA, P24; Varzi A.C., 2004, LAW NONCONTRADICTION, P93; VARZI AC, 2002, PHILOS ISSUES, V12, P197; Varzi A., 2000, FRONTIERS PARACONSIS, P279; WEATHERSON B, 2002, UNPUB SUPERVALUATION; WILLIAMS JRG, 2005, UNPUB IS GLOBAL CONS; Williamson T., 1990, IDENTITY DISCRIMINAT; Williamson T., 1994, VAGUENESS; WRIGHT C, 1987, PHILOS TOPICS, V15, P204; ZALTA EN, 1988, J PHILOS, V85, P57, DOI 10.2307/2026992","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzm633",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","205FB","WOS:000249098300006",,,,,"2018-01-02",120.0,"bealljc bealljc bencivengae bohmc burnslyndaclaire carrolll colledged deverjn dummettmichael dummettm dummettm edgingtond endertonhb finekit fodorja fregegg graffd greenoughpatrick haacks hajekp heckrg herzbergerhg horgant hyded hyded kamph keeferosann keeferosanna keefer keenesk koonsrc kremerp kripkes lewisd lewisdk lewisdk machinakf mcgeev mcgeev mcgeev mcgeev mcgeev mendelsone morreaum priestgraham przeleckim reschern restallg restallg sanforddh scottd shapiros sobeljh sorensenra tappendenj vanfraassenbc varzia varziac varziac varziac varziac varziac varziac varzia weathersonb williamsjrg williamsont williamsont wrightc zaltaen batensd","cluster_3"
-0.8774557532953219,-0.6526353878977573,28.0,35.0,38.0,0.0,3.0,2005.0,114.0,453.0,1.0,30.0,30.0,"J","Fara, M; Williamson, T",,,,"Fara, M; Williamson, T",,,"Counterparts and actuality","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"CONTINGENT IDENTITY; LOGIC",,"Cornell Univ, Sage Sch Philosophy, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA; Univ Oxford New Coll, Oxford OX1 3BN, England","Fara, M (reprint author), Cornell Univ, Sage Sch Philosophy, 218 Goldwin Smith Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA.","michael.fara@cornell.edu; timothy.williamson@philosophy.oxford.ac.uk",,,,,"Cresswell M., 1990, ENTITIES INDICES; Crossley J. N, 1977, REPORTS MATH LOGIC, VVIII, P11; DAVIDSON D, 1972, SEMANTICS NATURAL LA; Davies M., 1981, MEANING QUANTIFICATI; FORBES G, 1982, ANALYSIS, V42, P33, DOI 10.2307/3327712 ; FORBES G, 1990, ANALYSIS, V50, P167, DOI 10.2307/3328538 ; Forbes Graeme, 1989, LANGUAGES POSSIBILIT; Forbes Graeme, 1985, METAPHYSICS MODALITY; GABBAY D. M., 1989, HDB PHILOS LOGIC, V4; GIBBARD A, 1975, J PHILOS LOGIC, V4, P187, DOI 10.1007/BF00693273 ; HAZEN A, 1979, J PHILOS, V76, P319, DOI 10.2307/2025472 ; HAZEN A, 1976, J PHILOS LOGIC, V5, P25; HODES HT, 1984, J PHILOS LOGIC, V13, P27, DOI 10.1007/BF00297575 ; HODES HT, 1984, J PHILOS LOGIC, V13, P13, DOI 10.1007/BF00297574 ; HZEN A, 1990, NOTRE DAME J FORM L, V31, P498; KRIPKE S., 1980, NAMING NECESSITY; Kripke S., 1963, ACTA PHILOS FENN, V16, P83; Lewis D., 1986, PLURALITY WORLDS; Lewis D., 1983, PHILOS PAPERS, V1, P26; Linsky B., 1994, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, P431; Lovibond S., 1996, ESSAYS D WIGGINS IDE; O'Hear Anthony, 2002, LOGIC THOUGHT LANGUA; Prior A. N., 1955, FORMAL LOGIC; Prior A., 1956, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V21, P60; RAMACHANDRAN M, 1990, ANALYSIS, V50, P173, DOI 10.2307/3328539 ; RAMACHANDRAN M, 1990, ANALYSIS, V50, P163, DOI 10.2307/3328537 ; RAMACHANDRAN M, 1989, ANALYSIS, V49, P131, DOI 10.2307/3328115 ; Williamson T., 1998, ERKENNTNIS, V48, P257","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fz001",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","890OA","WOS:000226519500001",,,,,"2018-01-02",121.0,"crossleyjn davidsond daviesm forbesg forbesg forbesgraeme forbesgraeme gabbaydm gibbarda hazena hazena hodesht hodesht hzena kripkes kripkes lewisd lewisd linskyb lovibonds ohearanthony prioran priora ramachandranm ramachandranm ramachandranm williamsont cresswellm","cluster_3"
0.00830704239106519,0.0307633186386223,5.0,35.0,35.0,0.0,0.0,2004.0,113.0,450.0,237.0,249.0,13.0,"J","Nover, H; Hajek, A",,,,"Nover, H; Hajek, A",,,"Vexing expectations","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"Caltech, Pasadena, CA 91126 USA; CALTECH, Humanities & Social Sci Div, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA","Nover, H (reprint author), Caltech, Pasadena, CA 91126 USA.","nover@its.caltech.edu; ahajek@hss.caltech.edu",,,,,"Apostol T. M., 1967, CALCULUS, V1; CLARK M, 2002, PARADOXES A Z; Jeffrey Richard, 1983, LOGIC DECISION; MARTIN R, 2001, STANFORD ENCY PHILOS; NATHAN A, 1984, PHILOS SCI, V51, P128, DOI 10.1086/289168","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/113.450.237",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","819YO","WOS:000221352600001",,,,,"2018-01-02",122.0,"clarkm jeffreyrichard martinr nathana apostoltm","cluster_3"
-1.8091089812043255,-1.6265378611819046,65.0,35.0,35.0,0.0,1.0,1996.0,105.0,419.0,377.0,413.0,37.0,"J","JACKSON, F",,,,"JACKSON, F",,,"MENTAL CAUSATION","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"PSYCHOLOGY",,,"JACKSON, F (reprint author), AUSTRALIAN NATL UNIV,RES SCH SOCIAL SCI,CANBERRA,ACT 2600,AUSTRALIA.",,,,,,"ARMSTRONG DM, 1968, MATERIALIST THEORY M; Armstrong D. M., 1989, UNIVERSALS OPINIONAT; Block N, 1990, MEANING METHOD ESSAY, P137; BRADDONMITCHELL D, 1996, PHILOS MIND CONGNITI; BURGE T, 1986, PHILOS REV, V95, P3, DOI 10.2307/2185131 ; Burge T., 1993, MENTAL CAUSATION, P97; Burge T., 1979, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V4, P73; Child W, 1994, CAUSALITY INTERPRETA; Churchland P., 1988, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V62, P209; Copeland J., 1993, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE; CRANE T, 1995, ARIST SOC P, V69, P211; Davidson D., 1967, J PHILOS, V64; Davidson D., 1980, J PHILOS, V60, P3; Davidson D., 1980, PSYCHOLOGY AS PHILOS, P229; Davidson D, 2001, P ADDRESSES AM PHILO, DOI DOI 10.2307/3131782; DAVIDSON D, 1980, AGENT ACTION REASONS; DAVIDSON D, 1980, ESSAYS ACTIONS EVENT; DAVIDSON D, 1993, MENTAL CAUSATION, P3; DENNETT D, 1989, SCI EXPLANATION, P13; Dennett DC, 1989, INTENTIONAL STANCE; Devitt Michael, 1990, MIND COGNITION, P371; Dretske F., 1993, MENTAL CAUSATION, P121; FIELD H, 1981, READINGS PHILOS PSYC, V2, P78; Fodor J., 1987, PSYCHOSEMANTICS; Fodor J., 1974, SYNTHESE, V28, P97, DOI [10.1007/BF00485230, DOI 10.1007/BF00485230]; FODOR JA, 1980, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V3, P63, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X00001771 ; Goldman A., 1970, THEORY HUMAN ACTION; Haldane J. J., 1988, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V62, P223; Mele A., 1993, MENTAL CAUSATION; HONDERICH T, 1982, ANALYSIS, V42, P59, DOI 10.2307/3327718 ; HORGAN T, 1991, DRETSKE HIS CRITICS, P73; Hornsby Jennifer, 1980, ACTIONS; HORNSBY J, 1980, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V81, P73; JACKSON F, 1995, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V95, P253; JACKSON F, 1988, MIND, V97, P381; JACKSON F, 1982, PHILOS STUD, V42, P209, DOI 10.1007/BF00374035 ; JACKSON F, 1990, PHILOS PHENOMENOLOGI, P195; Jackson F., 1993, MIND LANG, V8, P298; Jackson F., 1993, MENTAL CAUSATION, P259; Kim Jaegwon, 1993, SUPERVENIENCE MIND; LEITER B, 1994, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V72, P220, DOI 10.1080/00048409412346021 ; Lewis D., 1986, PLURALITY WORLDS; LEWIS RT, 1994, CONDIT MON, P412; Lockwood M., 1989, MIND BRAIN QUANTUM; MACDONALD G, 1992, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V66, P225; MCDOWELL J, 1978, ACTION INTERPRETATIO; McDowell J., 1986, SUBJECT THOUGHT CONT, P137; McDowell J, 1985, ACTIONS EVENTS PERSP, P387; McDowell John, 1982, P BRIT ACAD, V68, P455; MCGINN C, 1982, THOUGHT OBJECT; McGinn C., 1989, MENTAL CONTENT; McLaughlin Brian, 1993, MENTAL CAUSATION; MELLOR DH, 1991, FACTS CAUSATION; OLIVER A, 1996, MIND, V105, P1, DOI 10.1093/mind/105.417.1 ; PEACOCKE C, 1993, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V92, P203; Pessin A, 1995, TWIN EARTH CHRONICLE; Putnam H., 1975, MIND LANGUAGE REALIT, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CB09780511625251, 10.1017/CBO9780511625251]; Ramsey W., 1990, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V4, P449; Ryle G., 1949, CONCEPT MIND; Schiffer S., 1987, REMNANTS MEANING; SEGAL G, 1991, PHILOS STUD, V63, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF00375995 ; STERELNY K, 1990, REPRESENTATIONAL THE; STICH S, 1990, FRAGMENTATION REASON; Tye Michael, 1995, 10 PROBLEMS CONSCIOU; TYE M, 1992, IMAGERY DEBATE","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/105.419.377",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","UZ497","WOS:A1996UZ49700001",,,,,"2018-01-02",123.0,"armstrongdm blockn braddonmitchelld burget burget burget childw churchlandp copelandj cranet davidsond davidsond davidsond davidsond davidsond davidsond davidsond dennettd dennettdc devittmichael dretskef fieldh fodorj fodorj fodorja goldmana haldanejj melea hondericht horgant hornsbyjennifer hornsbyj jacksonf jacksonf jacksonf jacksonf jacksonf jacksonf kimjaegwon leiterb lewisd lewisrt lockwoodm macdonaldg mcdowellj mcdowellj mcdowellj mcdowelljohn mcginnc mcginnc mclaughlinbrian mellordh olivera peacockec pessina putnamh ramseyw ryleg schiffers segalg sterelnyk stichs tyemichael tyem armstrongdm","cluster_0"
-0.3212318721757433,1.1021025156487179,24.0,35.0,35.0,0.0,2.0,1995.0,104.0,415.0,473.0,490.0,18.0,"J","HAUSMAN, DM",,,,"HAUSMAN, DM",,,"THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF INTERPERSONAL UTILITY COMPARISONS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"HAUSMAN, DM (reprint author), UNIV WISCONSIN,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,MADISON,WI 53706, USA.",,,,,,"ARROW KJ, 1978, PHILOSOPHIA, V7, P223, DOI 10.1007/BF02378811 ; BARRETT M, 1990, ECON PHILOS, V6, P293, DOI 10.1017/S0266267100001267 ; BRANDT R, 1978, THEORY RIGHT GOOD; Broome J., 1991, WEIGHING GOODS; Elster J., 1991, INTERPERSONAL COMPAR; Gauthier D., 1986, MORALS AGREEMENT; Griffin J., 1986, WELL BEING; Griffin J., 1991, INTERPERSONAL COMPAR, P45; Hammond P., 1991, INTERPERSONAL COMPAR, P200, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139172387; HARSANYI JC, 1977, RATIONAL BEHAVIOR BA; ISBELL JR, 1959, CONTRIBUTIONS THEORY, V4; Jeffrey R., 1971, J PHILOS, V68, P647; Kolm S, 1972, JUSTICE EQUITE; MACKAY AF, 1986, J PHILOS, V83, P305, DOI 10.2307/2026093 ; Nozick R., 1974, ANARCHY STATE UTOPIA; Parfit D., 1984, REASONS PERSONS; Rawls John, 1971, THEORY JUSTICE; ROBBINS L., 1935, ESSAY NATURE SIGNIFI; Robbins L, 1953, ECONOMICA-NEW SER, V20, P99, DOI 10.2307/2550835 ; Scanlon T. M., 1991, INTERPERSONAL COMP W, P17; SCHICK F, 1971, J PHILOS, P657; Sen A., 1979, EC HUMAN WELFARE, P183; Sen A. K., 1970, COLLECTIVE CHOICE SO; Weymark John A., 1991, INTERPERSONAL COMP W, P255, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139172387.009","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/104.415.473",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","RJ564","WOS:A1995RJ56400002",,,,,"2018-01-02",124.0,"barrettm brandtr broomej elsterj gauthierd griffinj griffinj hammondp harsanyijc isbelljr jeffreyr kolms mackayaf nozickr parfitd rawlsjohn robbinsl robbinsl scanlontm schickf sena senak weymarkjohna arrowkj","cluster_4"
-0.764807540139223,-0.530569198163005,26.0,35.0,36.0,0.0,1.0,1992.0,101.0,403.0,501.0,520.0,20.0,"J","PRICE, H",,,,"PRICE, H",,,"AGENCY AND CAUSAL ASYMMETRY","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"PRICE, H (reprint author), UNIV SYDNEY,SYDNEY,NSW 2006,AUSTRALIA.",,,,,,"Blackburn S, 1984, SPREADING WORD; BRADDONMITCHELL D, 1992, IN PRESS COULD CAUSA; DUMMETT M, 1964, PHILOS REV, V73, P338, DOI 10.2307/2183661 ; HALDANE J, 1992, REALITY REPRESENTATI; HAUSMAN DM, 1986, AM PHILOS QUART, V23, P143; HAUSMAN DM, 1984, NOUS, V18, P261, DOI 10.2307/2215163 ; Horwich P., 1987, ASYMMETRIES TIME; JOHNSTON M, 1992, REALITY REPRESENTATI; Johnston Mark, 1989, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V63, P139; LEWIS D, 1979, NOUS, V113, P455; MENZIES P, 1992, IN PRESS BRIT J PHIL; OWENS DJ, 1992, CAUSES COINCIDENCES; PAPINEAU D, 1985, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V36, P273, DOI 10.1093/bjps/36.3.273 ; Pettit Philip, 1991, MIND, V100, P587; POPPER KR, 1956, NATURE, V177, P538, DOI 10.1038/177538a0 ; PRICE H, 1991, FOUND PHYS, V21, P959, DOI 10.1007/BF00733218; PRICE H, 1991, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V42, P111, DOI 10.1093/bjps/42.1.111; PRICE H, 1990, MIND, V99, P221; PRICE H, 1991, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V42, P157, DOI 10.1093/bjps/42.2.157 ; Price H., 1984, SYNTHESE, V16, P299, DOI [10.1007/BF00485056, DOI 10.1007/BF00485056]; PRICE H, 1992, IN PRESS J PHILOS; Price H., 1988, FACTS FUNCTION TRUTH; PRICE H, 1991, WORKING PAPERS PHILO, V1, P46; Ramsey F. P., 1929, FDN ESSAYS PHILOS LO, P133; TOOLEY M, 1987, CAUSATION REALIST AP; WRIGHT C, 1992, REALITY REPRESENTATI","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/101.403.501",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","JG315","WOS:A1992JG31500005",,,,,"2018-01-02",125.0,"braddonmitchelld dummettm haldanej hausmandm hausmandm horwichp johnstonm johnstonmark lewisd menziesp owensdj papineaud pettitphilip popperkr priceh priceh priceh priceh priceh priceh priceh priceh ramseyfp tooleym wrightc blackburns","cluster_3"
-0.2588023795568621,-0.259921365660239,11.0,35.0,35.0,0.0,0.0,1991.0,100.0,400.0,485.0,494.0,10.0,"J","SEGAL, G",,,,"SEGAL, G",,,"DEFENSE OF A REASONABLE INDIVIDUALISM","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"SEGAL, G (reprint author), UNIV LONDON KINGS COLL,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,LONDON WC2R 2LS,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"BURGE T, 1986, PHILOS REV, V95, P3, DOI 10.2307/2185131 ; BURGE T, 1988, CONTENTS THOUGHT, P62; CRANE T, 1991, PHILOS QUART, V41, P1, DOI 10.2307/2219783 ; DAVIES M, 1991, MIND, VC, P461; DAVIES M, IN PRESS P ARISTOTEL, V92; EGAN F, 1991, PHILOS REV, V100, P179, DOI 10.2307/2185299 ; Fodor J., 1987, PSYCHOSEMANTICS; Marr D., 1982, VISION; MATTHEWS RJ, 1988, CONTENTS THOUGHT, P77; McGinn C., 1989, MENTAL CONTENT; SEGAL G, 1989, PHILOS REV, V98, P189, DOI 10.2307/2185282","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","GL556","WOS:A1991GL55600004",,,,,"2018-01-02",126.0,"burget cranet daviesm daviesm eganf fodorj marrd matthewsrj mcginnc segalg burget","cluster_0"
-0.47672340317631773,-0.36569489672386685,13.0,35.0,36.0,0.0,0.0,1982.0,91.0,361.0,1.0,19.0,19.0,"J","HACKER, PMS",,,,"HACKER, PMS",,,"EVENTS AND OBJECTS IN SPACE AND TIME","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"HACKER, PMS (reprint author), UNIV OXFORD ST JOHNS COLL,OXFORD OX1 3JP,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"BROAD CD, SCI THOUGHT; DAVIDSON D, 1967, LOGIC DECISION ACTIO, P16; DAVIDSON D, 1970, ESSAYS HONOR CG HEMP, P228; DRETSKE F, 1967, MIND; Geach P., 1972, LOGIC MATTERS; Geach P. T., 1969, GOD SOUL; MARTIN RM, 1969, FACT EXISTENCE; Quine Willard Van Orman, 1960, WORD OBJECT; Quine WvO, 1966, WAYS PARADOX; QUINTON AM, 1979, MIND, V88, P210; RUSSELL B, 1956, LOGIC KNOWLEDGE, P329; RUSSELL B, ANALYSIS MATTER; Wiggins D., 1980, SAMENESS SUBSTANCE","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","MY218","WOS:A1982MY21800001",,,,,"2018-01-02",127.0,"davidsond davidsond dretskef geachp geachpt martinrm quinewillardvanorman quinewvo quintonam russellb russellb wigginsd broadcd","cluster_0"
-0.036054961920578076,0.4152137529976326,13.0,35.0,35.0,1.0,9.0,1977.0,86.0,344.0,532.0,554.0,23.0,"J","ANNAS, J",,,,"ANNAS, J",,,"PLATO AND ARISTOTLE ON FRIENDSHIP AND ALTRUISM","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"ST HUGHS COLL,OXFORD,ENGLAND",,,,,,,"ADKINS A, 1963, CLASSICAL QUART; ALLAN DJ, PHILOSOPHY ARISTOTLE, P138; Aristotle, EUDEMIAN ETHICS; Aristotle, NICOMACHEAN ETHICS; ARISTOTLE, ETHICAL THEORY, P322; FORTENBAUGH W, 1975, PHRONESIS; NAGEL T, POSSIBILITY ALTRUISM; NEWTONSMITH W, PHILOSOPHY PERSONAL; PLATO, 2015, LYSIS; TELFER E, 1970, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC; VERSENYI L, 1975, PHRONESIS, P192; VLASTOS G, PLATONIC STUDIES, P35; WILLIAMS B, PROBLEMS SELF","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","DY715","WOS:A1977DY71500004",,,,,"2018-01-02",128.0,"allandj aristotle aristotle aristotle fortenbaughw nagelt newtonsmithw plato telfere versenyil vlastosg williamsb adkinsa","cluster_6"
0.02528005806661182,0.03617959210566552,2.0,35.0,35.0,0.0,1.0,1974.0,83.0,330.0,269.0,275.0,7.0,"J","NEBLETT, WR",,,,"NEBLETT, WR",,,"FORGIVENESS AND IDEALS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"OCCIDENTAL COLL,LOS ANGELES,CA 90041",,,,,,,"Downie R. S., 1965, PHILOS Q, V15, P128; OSHAUGHNESSY RJ, 1967, PHILOSOPHY, V42, P336, DOI 10.1017/S0031819100001522","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","T0277","WOS:A1974T027700009",,,,,"2018-01-02",129.0,"oshaughnessyrj downiers","cluster_6"
-0.2577558034587868,-0.2554765653595161,16.0,34.0,38.0,0.0,2.0,2006.0,115.0,460.0,957.0,982.0,26.0,"J","Rodriguez-Pereyra, G",,,,"Rodriguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo",,,"Truthmaking, entailment, and the conjunction thesis","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"In this paper I undermine the Entailment Principle according to which if an entity is a truthmaker for a certain proposition and this proposition entails another, then the entity in question is a truthmaker for the latter proposition. I argue that the two most promising versions of the principle entail the popular but false Conjunction Thesis, namely that a truthmaker for a conjunction is a truthmaker for its conjuncts. One promising version of the principle understands entailment as strict implication but restricts the field of application of the principle to purely contingent truths (i.e. those that contain no necessary proposition at any level of analysis). But a conjunction of purely contingent truths strictly implies its conjuncts. So this version of the principle is committed to the Conjunction Thesis. The same is true of the version of the principle where entailment is understood in the sense of systems T, R, and E of relevant logic, since in these systems conjunctions entail their conjuncts. I argue that the Conjunction Thesis is false because a truthmaker is that in virtue of what a certain proposition is true and it is false that, for example, what the proposition that Peter is a man is true in virtue of is the conjunctive fact that Peter is man and Saturn is a planet (or the facts that Peter is a man and that Saturn is a planet taken together). I also argue against other versions of the principle.","Univ Nottingham, Dept Philosophy, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England; Univ Torcuato Tella, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina","Rodriguez-Pereyra, G (reprint author), Univ Nottingham, Dept Philosophy, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England.","gonzalo.rp21@gmail.com",,,,,"Anderson A. R., 1975, ENTAILMENT LOGIC REL; Armstrong D., 2004, TRUTH TRUTHMAKERS; Armstrong D.M., 1997, WORLD STATES AFFAIRS; Bigelow J., 1988, REALITY NUMBERS; FOX JF, 1987, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V65, P188, DOI 10.1080/00048408712342871 ; Milne P, 2005, ANALYSIS, V65, P221, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8284.2005.00553.x ; MULLIGAN K, 1992, LANGUAGE TRUTH ONTOL; MULLIGAN KP, 1984, PHILOS PHENOMENOLOGI, V64, P287; Nelson E. J., 1930, MIND, V39, P440; Read S, 2000, MIND, V109, P67, DOI 10.1093/mind/109.433.67 ; Read S, 1988, RELEVANT LOGIC PHILO; RESTALL G, 1996, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V74, P331, DOI 10.1080/00048409612347331 ; RESTALL G, 1995, WHAT TURTHMAKERS CAN; Rodriguez-Pereyra G, 2006, ANALYSIS, V66, P260, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8284.2006.00625.x ; RODRIGUEZPEREYR.G, 2002, RESEMBLANCE NOMINALI; Williamson T, 1999, DIALECTICA, V53, P253","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzl957",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","094ZG","WOS:000241277400006",,,,,"2018-01-02",130.0,"armstrongd armstrongdm bigelowj foxjf milnep mulligank mulligankp nelsonej reads reads restallg restallg rodriguezpereyrag rodriguezpereyrg williamsont andersonar","cluster_3"
-0.6447997698731547,-0.2986949449411113,31.0,34.0,34.0,1.0,3.0,2004.0,113.0,450.0,251.0,283.0,33.0,"J","Arntzenius, F; Elga, A; Hawthorne, J",,,,"Arntzenius, F; Elga, A; Hawthorne, J",,,"Bayesianism, infinite decisions, and binding","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"DUTCH-BOOK; PROBABILITY; PARADOX; BELIEF",,"Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA; Princeton Univ, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA","Arntzenius, F (reprint author), Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, 26 Nichol Ave, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA.","arntzeni@rci.rutgers.edu; adame@princeton.edu; jphawtho@rcirutgers.edu",,,,,"AMSEY FP, 1931, FDN MATH OTHER LOGIC; ARNTZENIUS F., 1997, ANALYSIS, V57, P28; ARNTZENIUS F, 2003, J PHILOS, P356; Barrett JA, 1999, THEOR DECIS, V46, P101, DOI 10.1023/A:1005094023022 ; BROOME J, 1995, ANALYSIS, V55, P6, DOI 10.2307/3328613 ; Christensen D, 1996, J PHILOS, V93, P450, DOI 10.2307/2940893 ; de Finetti B., 1974, THEORY PROBABILITY; Earman J., 1996, BENACERRAF HIS CRITI, P231; Earman J., 1992, BAYES BUST; ELGA A, 1997, UNPUB FAILURES DOMIN; Gauthier D, 1997, NOUS, V31, P1, DOI 10.1111/0029-4624.00033 ; Gibbard A., 1978, F APPLICATIONS DECIS, V1, P125; GRACELY EJ, 1988, ANALYSIS, V48, P113; Hajek A, 2003, SYNTHESE, V137, P273, DOI 10.1023/B:SYNT.0000004904.91112.16 ; Jaynes E. T., 2003, PROBABILITY THEORY L; Jeffrey Richard, 1983, LOGIC DECISION; Kadane J. B., 1986, BAYESIAN INFERENCE D, V6, P59; LANDESMAN C, 1995, ANALYSIS, V55, P12; LEWIS D, 1981, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V59, P5, DOI 10.1080/00048408112340011 ; Lewis D., 1980, STUDIES INDUCTIVE LO, V2; McGee V, 1999, ANALYSIS, V59, P257, DOI 10.1111/1467-8284.00178 ; Norton JD, 1998, PAC PHILOS QUART, V79, P34, DOI 10.1111/1468-0114.00049 ; PITOWSKY I, 1983, PHYS REV D, V27, P2316, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.27.2316 ; POLLOCK JL, 1983, NOUS, V17, P409, DOI 10.2307/2215257 ; [Anonymous], 1952, LOGIC SCI DISCOVERY; Renyi A., 1955, ACTA MATH ACAD SCI H, V6, P285; SEIDENFELD T, 1983, PHILOS SCI, V50, P398, DOI 10.1086/289126 ; Skyrms B., 1980, CAUSAL NECESSITY; Stalnaker R., 1999, RES EC, V53, P293, DOI DOI 10.1006/REEC.1999.0200; VANFRAASSEN BC, 1995, PHILOS STUD, V77, P7, DOI 10.1007/BF00996309 ; VANFRAASSEN BC, 1984, J PHILOS, V81, P235","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/113.450.251",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","819YO","WOS:000221352600002",,,,,"2018-01-02",131.0,"arntzeniusf arntzeniusf barrettja broomej christensend definettib earmanj earmanj elgaa gauthierd gibbarda gracelyej hajeka jayneset jeffreyrichard kadanejb landesmanc lewisd lewisd mcgeev nortonjd pitowskyi pollockjl renyia seidenfeldt skyrmsb stalnakerr vanfraassenbc vanfraassenbc amseyfp","cluster_3"
-0.5312738929088697,-0.1470874345542531,25.0,34.0,34.0,0.0,1.0,2002.0,111.0,442.0,201.0,223.0,23.0,"J","Beebee, H; Mele, A",,,,"Beebee, H; Mele, A",,,"Humean compatibilism","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"TOXIN PUZZLE; RESPONSIBILITY; LUCK","Humean compatibilism is the combination of a Humean position on laws of nature and the thesis that free will is compatible with determinism. This article aim is to situate Humean compatibilism in the current debate among libertarians, traditional compatibilists, and semicompatibilists about free will, We argue that a Humean about laws can hold that there is a sense in which the laws of nature are 'up to us' and hence that the leading style of argument for incompatibilism--the consequence argument--has a false premiss. We also display some striking similarities between Humean compatibilism and libertarianism, an incompatibilist view. For example, standard libertarians face a problem about luck, and we show that Humean compatibilists face a very similar problem.","Univ Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England; Florida State Univ, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA","Beebee, H (reprint author), Univ Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England.",,,"Beebee, Helen/0000-0001-7650-3622",,,"Armstrong David, 1983, WHAT IS LAW NATURE; Ayer A. J., 1954, PHILOS ESSAYS; BEEBEE H, 2000, PHILOS PHENOMENOLOGI, V56, P571; Fischer John Martin, 1994, METAPHYSICS FREE WIL; Haji Ishtiyaque, 1999, PHILOS EXPLORATIONS, V2, P42; Kane R, 1999, J PHILOS, V96, P217, DOI 10.2307/2564666; Kane Robert, 1995, SIGNIFICANCE FREE WI; Kane Robert, 1999, PHILOS EXPLORATIONS, V2, P105; KAVKA GS, 1983, ANALYSIS, V43, P33, DOI 10.2307/3327802 ; LEWIS D, 1981, THEORIA, V47, P113; Lewis D., 1986, PHILOS PAPERS; Lewis D., 1973, COUNTERFACTUALS; LOWER B, 1996, PHILOS TOPICS, V24, P101; Mele Alfred, 1999, PHILOS EXPLORATIONS, V2, P96; Mele AR, 1999, SOC PHILOS POLICY, V16, P274, DOI 10.1017/S0265052500002478 ; MELE AR, 1992, PHILOS STUD, V68, P171, DOI 10.1007/BF00354475 ; MELE A. R., 1995, AUTONOMOUS AGENTS SE; Mill J.S., 1875, SYSTEM LOGIC; Moore G. E., 1912, ETHICS; RAMSEY FP, 1978, FOUNDATIONS, P128; STRAWSON G, 1994, PHILOS STUD, V75, P5, DOI 10.1007/BF00989879 ; SWARTZ N, 1985, CONCEPT PHYSICAL LAW; VANIWNAGEN P, 1983, ESSAY FREE WILL; VIHVELIN K, 1990, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V68, P371, DOI 10.1080/00048409012344381 ; WALLER BN, 1988, BEHAVIORISM, V16, P149","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/111.442.201",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","545WG","WOS:000175240100001",,,,,"2018-01-02",132.0,"ayeraj beebeeh fischerjohnmartin hajiishtiyaque kaner kanerobert kanerobert kavkags lewisd lewisd lewisd lowerb melealfred melear melear melear milljs moorege ramseyfp strawsong swartzn vaniwnagenp vihvelink wallerbn armstrongdavid","cluster_3"
-0.0987564165784852,-0.09791634927870256,17.0,34.0,34.0,0.0,0.0,1995.0,104.0,413.0,107.0,131.0,25.0,"J","SCHIFFER, S",,,,"SCHIFFER, S",,,"DESCRIPTIONS, INDEXICALS, AND BELIEF REPORTS - SOME DILEMMAS (BUT NOT THE ONES YOU EXPECT)","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"SCHIFFER, S (reprint author), CUNY,GRAD CTR,PROGRAM PHILOSOPHY,33 W 42 ST,NEW YORK,NY 10036, USA.",,,,,,"BLACKBURN WK, 1988, PHILOS STUD, V53, P263, DOI 10.1007/BF00354644 ; CRIMMINS M, 1989, J PHILOS, V86, P685, DOI 10.2307/2027014 ; Crimmins Mark, 1992, TALK ABOUT BELIEF; Fine Kit, 1975, SYNTHESE, V30, P265, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00485047; Fodor J., 1990, THEORY CONTENT; Richard M., 1990, PROPOSITIONAL ATTITU; SCHIFFER S, 1994, NOUS, V28, P279, DOI 10.2307/2216061 ; SCHIFFER S, 1977, MIDWEST STUDIES PHIL; SCHIFFER S, 1987, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V1; Schiffer S., 1978, ERKENNTNIS, V13, P171; SCHIFFER S, 1981, SYNTHESE, V69, P43; SCHIFFER S, 1992, J PHILOS, V89, P492; WETTSTEIN HK, 1981, PHILOS STUD, V40, P241, DOI 10.1007/BF00353794 ; WETTSTEIN HK, 1979, PHILOS STUD, V36, P91, DOI 10.1007/BF00354385 ; WETTSTEIN HK, 1983, PHILOS STUD, V44, P187, DOI 10.1007/BF00354099 ; WILSON GM, 1991, J PHILOS, V88, P359, DOI 10.2307/2027090 ; ZALTA E, UNPUB MODES PRESENTA","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/104.413.107",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","QH555","WOS:A1995QH55500004",,,,,"2018-01-02",133.0,"crimminsm crimminsmark finekit fodorj richardm schiffers schiffers schiffers schiffers schiffers schiffers wettsteinhk wettsteinhk wettsteinhk wilsongm zaltae blackburnwk","cluster_0"
-0.05087566296575699,-0.06974968354875881,7.0,34.0,34.0,0.0,2.0,1994.0,103.0,409.0,25.0,34.0,10.0,"J","PRIEST, G",,,,"PRIEST, G",,,"THE STRUCTURE OF THE PARADOXES OF SELF-REFERENCE","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"PRIEST, G (reprint author), UNIV QUEENSLAND,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,BRISBANE,QLD 4072,AUSTRALIA.",,,,,,"GODEL K., 1944, PHILOS B RUSSELL; MARTIN RL, 1977, PHILOS REV, V8, P454; Peano G., 1906, REV MATH, V8, P143; PRIEST G, 1983, PHILOS QUART, V33, P160, DOI 10.2307/2218742 ; Priest G., 1987, CONTRADICTION; Ramsey F., 1925, P LOND MATH SOC, V25, P338; RUSSELL B, 1905, P LOND MATH SOC, V2, P29","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/103.409.25",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","MW974","WOS:A1994MW97400003",,,,,"2018-01-02",134.0,"martinrl peanog priestg priestg ramseyf russellb godelk","cluster_0"
-1.2917403379066523,0.9491985086988304,57.0,34.0,34.0,0.0,0.0,1990.0,99.0,395.0,355.0,385.0,31.0,"J","WALLACE, RJ",,,,"WALLACE, RJ",,,"HOW TO ARGUE ABOUT PRACTICAL REASON","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"WALLACE, RJ (reprint author), UNIV PENN,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19104, USA.",,,,,,"Alston W., 1967, ENCY PHILOS; Anscombe G. E. M., 1963, INTENTION; AUDI R, WAYS DESIRE; BRANDT RB, 1963, J PHILOS; BROUGHTON J, 1983, PHILOS STUDIES; COHON R, 1985, ETHICS; COLLINS J, 1989, JUL AAP C CANB; COLLINS J, 1988, MIND; DAHL N, 1984, PRACTICAL REASON ARI; Darwall S., 1983, IMPARTIAL REASON; DAVIS W, WAYS DESIRE; Dent N. J. H., 1984, MORAL PSYCHOL VIRTUE; Foot P., 1978, VIRTUES VICES; Frankfurt Harry, 1971, J PHILOS; Frankfurt H., 1987, RESPONSIBILITY CHARA; Hampshire Stuart, 1975, FREEDOM INDIVIDUAL; HINTIKKA J, 1974, PRACTICAL REASON; Hollis M., 1987, CUNNING REASON; HOOKER B, 1987, ANALYSIS; Hume David, 1978, TREATISE HUMAN NATUR; IRWIN TH, 1975, J PHILOS; KORSGAARD C, 1986, J PHILOS; KRAUT R, 1972, PHILOS REV; LEWIS D, 1988, MIND; LOCKE D, 1974, AM PHILOS Q; LOCKE D, 1982, AM PHILOS Q; Lovibond S., 1983, REALISM IMAGINATION; MARKS J, WAYS DESIRE; Marks J., 1986, WAYS DESIRE NEW ESSA; MCDOWELL J, 1987, P ADDRESSES AM PHILO; MCDOWELL J, 1978, ARISTOTELIAN SOC SUP; MCDOWELL J, 1979, MONIST; Nagel T, 1978, POSSIBILITY ALTRUISM; Nagel T., 1986, VIEW NOWHERE; Parfit D., 1984, REASONS PERSONS; PETTIT P, 1987, MIND; Pettit Phillip, 1986, SUBJECT THOUGHT CONT; PLATTS M, 1988, MIND; Platts M., 1979, WAYS MEANING; PRICE H, 1989, MIND; Rawls J., 1985, PHILOS PUBLIC AFFAIR; SCANLON TM, 1982, UTILITARIANISM BEYON; SCHIFFER S, 1976, AM PHILOS Q; Searle J. R., 1983, INTENTIONALITY; SMITH M, 1987, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC; SMITH M, 1987, MIND; SMITH M, 1989, MORAL PROBLEM; SMITH M, 1988, MIND; STURGEON N, 1974, PHILOS REV; WARNER R, 1987, FREEDOM ENJOYMENT HA; WATSON G, 1975, J PHILOS; WIGGINS D, 1980, ESSAYS ARISTOTLES ET; Williams B, 1985, ETHICS LIMITS PHILOS; WILLIAMS B., 1981, MORAL LUCK; WILLIAMS B, 1973, PROBLEMS SELF; Wollheim Richard, 1984, THREAD LIFE; WOODFIELD A, 1981, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","DR991","WOS:A1990DR99100002",,,,,"2018-01-02",135.0,"anscombegem audir brandtrb broughtonj cohonr collinsj collinsj dahln darwalls davisw dentnjh footp frankfurtharry frankfurth hampshirestuart hintikkaj hollism hookerb humedavid irwinth korsgaardc krautr lewisd locked locked lovibonds marksj marksj mcdowellj mcdowellj mcdowellj nagelt nagelt parfitd pettitp pettitphillip plattsm plattsm priceh rawlsj scanlontm schiffers searlejr smithm smithm smithm smithm sturgeonn warnerr watsong wigginsd williamsb williamsb williamsb wollheimrichard woodfielda alstonw","cluster_6"
-0.22134890694731854,-0.00210561146709587,13.0,34.0,34.0,0.0,0.0,1984.0,93.0,369.0,56.0,70.0,15.0,"J","HEIL, J",,,,"HEIL, J",,,"DOXASTIC INCONTINENCE","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"HEIL, J (reprint author), UNIV CALIF BERKELEY,DEPT PSYCHOL,BERKELEY,CA 94720, USA.",,,,,,"AUDI R, 1979, NOUS, V13, P173, DOI 10.2307/2214396 ; Bonjour Lawrence, 1980, MIDWEST STUDIES PHIL, V5; BRATMAN M, 1979, NOUS, V13, P153, DOI 10.2307/2214395 ; DAVIDSON D, 1980, ESSAYS ACTIONS EVENT; FREUD S, SPLITTING EGO PROCES; GOLDMAN A, 1980, MIDWEST STUDIES PHIL, V5; HEIL J, UNPUB PHILOS STUDIES; Kierkegaard S., 1941, CONCLUDING UNSCIENTI; Kierkegaard Soren, 1962, PHILOS FRAGMENTS; KORNBLITH H, UNPUB BELIEF FREE CH; STOCKER M, 1982, MIND, V91, P398; Williams Bernard, 1973, PROBLEMS SELF PHILOS; WINTERS B, 1979, J PHILOS, V76, P243, DOI 10.2307/2025880","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","RZ479","WOS:A1984RZ47900004",,,,,"2018-01-02",136.0,"bonjourlawrence bratmanm davidsond freuds goldmana heilj kierkegaards kierkegaardsoren kornblithh stockerm williamsbernard wintersb audir","cluster_6"
-0.015666278888276777,-0.01069984522578974,3.0,34.0,35.0,0.0,0.0,1979.0,88.0,349.0,74.0,92.0,19.0,"J","SEARLE, JR",,,,"SEARLE, JR",,,"WHAT IS AN INTENTIONAL STATE","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"SEARLE, JR (reprint author), UNIV CALIF BERKELEY,BERKELEY,CA 94720, USA.",,,,,,"SEARLE JR, 1975, NEW LITERARY HISTORY; SEARLE JR, 1975, MINNESOTA STUDIES PH, V6, P344; SEARLE JR, MEANING USE","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","GH782","WOS:A1979GH78200005",,,,,"2018-01-02",137.0,"searlejr searlejr searlejr","cluster_0"
-0.12427754964649111,0.15395734771272399,82.0,33.0,33.0,0.0,19.0,2012.0,121.0,483.0,677.0,702.0,26.0,"J","Klein, SB; Nichols, S",,,,"Klein, Stanley B.; Nichols, Shaun",,,"Memory and the Sense of Personal Identity","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"TRAIT SELF-KNOWLEDGE; MENTAL TIME-TRAVEL; EPISODIC MEMORY; AUTONOETIC CONSCIOUSNESS; AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL MEMORY; AMNESIA; PSYCHOLOGY; EVOLUTION; IMAGINE; SYSTEMS","Memory of past episodes provides a sense of personal identity - the sense that I am the same person as someone in the past. We present a neurological case study of a patient who has accurate memories of scenes from his past, but for whom the memories lack the sense of mineness. On the basis of this case study, we propose that the sense of identity derives from two components, one delivering the content of the memory and the other generating the sense of mineness. We argue that this new model of the sense of identity has implications for debates about quasi-memory. In addition, articulating the components of the sense of identity promises to bear on the extent to which this sense of identity provides evidence of personal identity.","[Klein, Stanley B.] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA; [Nichols, Shaun] Univ Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA","Klein, SB (reprint author), Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA.","stan.klein@psych.ucsb.edu; sbn@email.arizona.edu",,,,,"Atance CM, 2005, LEARN MOTIV, V36, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.lmot.2005.02.003; Baxter D., 2008, HUMES DIFFICULTY TIM; Bergson H., 1911, MATTER MEMORY; Bernecker S., 2010, MEMORY A PHILOSOPHIC; Berntsen D, 2010, CURR DIR PSYCHOL SCI, V19, P138, DOI 10.1177/0963721410370301; Blatti Stephan, ANIMALISM FORTHCOMIN; Brennan A., 1985, PHILOSOPHY, V11, P195; Butler Joseph, 1906, THE ANALOGY OF RELIG; Butler Joseph, 1736, OF PERSONAL IDENTITY, P211; Campbell S, 2004, ANALYSIS, V64, P256, DOI 10.1111/j.0003-2638.2004.00494.x ; COLLINS AW, 1997, THE PHILOSOPHICAL QU, V47, P73; Dalla Barba G, 2002, MEMORY CONSCIOUSNESS; De Biran Maine, 1929, PSYCHOLOGY CLASSICS, VIII; De Biran Maine, 1803, THE INFLUENCE OF HAB; Donald M., 1991, ORIGINS MODERN MIND; Eakin P., 2008, LIVING AUTOBIOGRAPHI; Fivush R., 2003, AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL MEM; Foster J. K., 1999, MEMORY SYSTEMS PROCE; Furlong E. J., 1951, STUDY MEMORY; Gazzaniga M. A., 1995, COGNITIVE NEUROSCIEN; GAZZANIGA MS, 2004, COGNITIVE NEUROSCIEN, V3; Gennaro Rocco, 1996, CONSCIOUSNESS AND SE; Gillihan SJ, 2005, PSYCHOL BULL, V131, P76, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.76; Grice P., 1941, MIND, V50, P330; HAMILTON A, 1995, PHILOS QUART, V45, P332, DOI 10.2307/2219654 ; Hassabis D, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P1726, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0610561104; Hilts P. J., 1995, MEMORYS GHOST; Hume D., 1739, TREATISE HUMAN NATUR; Klein Stanley, 2010, THE YEAR IN COGNITIV, V1191, P1; Klein SB, 2004, SOC COGNITION, V22, P460, DOI 10.1521/soco.22.5.460.50765 ; Klein SB, 2002, SOC COGNITION, V20, P353, DOI 10.1521/soco.20.5.353.21125 ; Klein SB, 2002, PSYCHOL REV, V109, P306, DOI 10.1037//0033-295X.109.2.306; Klein SB, 1996, J EXP PSYCHOL GEN, V125, P250, DOI 10.1037/0096-3445.125.3.250; Klein Stanley B., FORTHCOMING IN SOCIA; Klein SB, 2010, SOC COGNITION, V28, P747; Klein SB, 2008, MEMORY, V16, P556, DOI 10.1080/09658210802010489; Klein SB, 2010, WIRES COGN SCI, V1, P172, DOI 10.1002/wcs.25; Klein SB, 2010, MEMORY, V18, P918, DOI 10.1080/09658211.2010.524651; Leary Mark, HANDBOOK OF SELF AND, V2; Locke J., 1731, ESSAY HUMAN UNDERSTA; Lund D. H., 2005, THE CONSCIOUS SELF; Musant Stanley, 1966, THE CONCEPT OF MEMOR; Nichols S, 2008, MIND LANG, V23, P518, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2008.00356.x ; Northoff G, 2000, PHILOS PSYCHOL, V13, P191, DOI 10.1080/09515080050075681 ; Olson E., 2007, WHAT ARE WE A STUDY; Olson Eric T., 1997, THE HUMAN ANIMAL PER; Parfit D., 1984, REASONS PERSONS; Parkin A. J., 1997, MEMORY AND AMNESIA; PERNER J, 1995, J EXP CHILD PSYCHOL, V59, P516, DOI 10.1006/jecp.1995.1024; PERRY J, 1977, PHILOS REV, V86, P474, DOI 10.2307/2184564 ; QUINTON A, 1962, J PHILOS, V59, P393, DOI 10.2307/2022957 ; Rathbone CJ, 2009, NEUROCASE, V15, P405, DOI 10.1080/13554790902849164; Reid Thomas, 1785, ESSAYS INTELLECTUAL; Rey Georges, 1997, CONTEMPORARY PHILOSO; Roache R, 2006, PHILOSOPHY, V81, P323, DOI 10.1017/S0031819106316075; Roediger Henry L, 2007, SCI MEMORY CONCEPTS; Salaman Esther, 1979, COLLECTION MOMENTS S; Schacter Daniel L., 2000, MEMORY BRAIN AND BEL; Tulving E., 1994, MEMORY SYSTEMS 1994; Schechtman M, 2004, AM PHILOS QUART, V41, P87; SCHECHTMAN M, 1990, J PHILOS, V87, P71, DOI 10.2307/2026882 ; Schechtman M, 2011, PHILOS STUD, V153, P65, DOI 10.1007/s11098-010-9645-6; Brewer M. B, 2001, INDIVIDUAL SELF RELA; Shoemaker D, 2008, STANFORD ENCY PHILOS; SHOEMAKER S, 1970, AM PHILOS QUART, V7, P269; Slors M, 2001, J PHILOS, V98, P186, DOI 10.2307/2678477 ; Slors M., 2001, THE DIACHRONIC MIND; Squire L.R., 1987, MEMORY BRAIN; SQUIRE LR, 1984, NEUROPSYCHOLOGY MEMO; SRULL TK, 1993, ADV SOCIAL COGNITION, V5; Storring GE, 1936, ARCH GESAMTE PSYCHOL, V95, P436; STUSS DT, 1988, BRAIN COGNITION, V8, P21, DOI 10.1016/0278-2626(88)90036-X ; Suddendorf T, 1997, GENET SOC GEN PSYCH, V123, P133; Suddendorf T, 2007, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V30, P299, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X07001975; TALLAND GA, 1964, AM PSYCHOL, V19, P351, DOI 10.1037/h0039768 ; TULVING E, 1985, CAN PSYCHOL, V26, P1, DOI 10.1037/h0080017; TULVING E, 1990, SCIENCE, V247, P301, DOI 10.1126/science.2296719; Tulving E., 1972, ORG MEMORY; Tulving E, 1993, CURRENT DIRECTIONS P, V2, P67, DOI DOI 10.1111/1467-8721.EP10770899; TULVING E, 1983, ELEMENTS EPISODIC ME; Wang X. T., THUS SPAKE EVOLUTION; Wheeler MA, 1997, PSYCHOL BULL, V121, P331, DOI 10.1037//0033-2909.121.3.331","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzs080",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","139FV","WOS:000318568300004",,,,,"2018-01-02",138.0,"baxterd bergsonh berneckers berntsend blattistephan brennana butlerjoseph butlerjoseph campbells collinsaw dallabarbag debiranmaine debiranmaine donaldm eakinp fivushr fosterjk furlongej gazzanigama gazzanigams gennarorocco gillihansj gricep hamiltona hassabisd hiltspj humed kleinstanley kleinsb kleinsb kleinsb kleinsb kleinstanleyb kleinsb kleinsb kleinsb kleinsb learymark lockej lunddh musantstanley nicholss northoffg olsone olsonerict parfitd parkinaj pernerj perryj quintona rathbonecj reidthomas reygeorges roacher roedigerhenryl salamanesther schacterdaniell tulvinge schechtmanm schechtmanm schechtmanm brewermb shoemakerd shoemakers slorsm slorsm squirelr squirelr srulltk storringge stussdt suddendorft suddendorft tallandga tulvinge tulvinge tulvinge tulvinge tulvinge wangxt wheelerma atancecm","cluster_6"
-0.388312594645503,-0.3467218846392353,33.0,33.0,33.0,0.0,2.0,2009.0,118.0,469.0,101.0,119.0,19.0,"J","Hawley, K",,,,"Hawley, Katherine",,,"Identity and Indiscernibility","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"QUANTITATIVE PARSIMONY; NEUTRAL RELATIONS; PERSISTENCE; THISNESS; PARTS","Putative counter examples to the Principle of Identity of Indiscernibles (PII) are notoriously inconclusive. I establish ground rules for debate in this area, offer a new response to Such counter examples for friends of the PII, but then argue that no response is entirely satisfactory. Finally, I Undermine some positive arguments for PII.","Univ St Andrews, Dept Philosophy, St Andrews KY16 9AL, Fife, Scotland","Hawley, K (reprint author), Univ St Andrews, Dept Philosophy, St Andrews KY16 9AL, Fife, Scotland.","kjh5@st-and.ac.uk",,,,,"ADAMS RM, 1979, J PHILOS, V76, P5, DOI 10.2307/2025812 ; Baker A, 2003, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V54, P245, DOI 10.1093/bjps/54.2.245 ; Bermudez Jose Luis, 2005, THOUGHT REFERENCE EX; Black M., 1952, MIND, V61, P153; Della Rocca M, 2005, PAC PHILOS QUART, V86, P480; Dorr C., 2004, OXFORD STUDIES METAP, V1, P155; Fine K, 2000, PHILOS REV, V109, P1; FORREST P, 2002, STANFORD ENCY PHILOS; French S, 1995, J PHILOS, V92, P455, DOI 10.2307/2940853 ; French S., 2006, IDENTITY INDIVIDUALI; French S., 2006, STANFORD ENCY PHILOS; HACKING I, 1975, J PHILOS, V72, P249, DOI 10.2307/2024896 ; Hawley K, 1999, MIND, V108, P53, DOI 10.1093/mind/108.429.53 ; Hawley K, 2006, ANALYSIS, V66, P300, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8284.2006.00633.x ; Hawthorne J., 2002, PHILOS TOPICS, V30, P53; Hudson H., 2006, METAPHYSICS HYPERSPA; LANDINI G, 1991, NOUS, V25, P43, DOI 10.2307/2216092 ; LOWE EJ, 2005, THOUGHT REFERENCE EX, P290; LOWE EJ, 1998, POSSIBILITY METAPHYS; MacBride F, 2007, DIALECTICA, V61, P25, DOI 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2007.01092.x; Mackie Penelope, 2006, THINGS MIGHT HAVE BE; Markosian N, 1998, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V76, P213, DOI 10.1080/00048409812348361 ; Nolan D, 1997, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V48, P329, DOI 10.1093/bjps/48.3.329 ; OLEARYHAWTHORNE J, 1995, ANALYSIS, V55, P191, DOI 10.2307/3328579 ; Parsons Josh, 2007, OXFORD STUDIES METAP, V3, P201; QUINE WV, 1976, J PHILOS, V73, P113, DOI 10.2307/2025739 ; Saunders S, 2006, ANALYSIS, V66, P52, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8284.2006.00589.x ; Sider T, 2001, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V63, P357, DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2001.tb00109.x; SWINBURNE R, 1995, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V73, P389, DOI 10.1080/00048409512346721 ; TELLER P, 1986, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V37, P71, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjps/37.1.71 ; VANINWAGEN P, 1981, PAC PHILOS QUART, V62, P123; van Inwagen P., 1990, MAT BEINGS; Wasserman R, 2002, PHILOS STUD, V111, P197, DOI 10.1023/A:1021283405720","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzn153",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","442IU","WOS:000265835700004",,,,,"2018-01-02",139.0,"bakera bermudezjoseluis blackm dellaroccam dorrc finek forrestp frenchs frenchs frenchs hackingi hawleyk hawleyk hawthornej hudsonh landinig loweej loweej macbridef mackiepenelope markosiann noland olearyhawthornej parsonsjosh quinewv saunderss sidert swinburner tellerp vaninwagenp vaninwagenp wassermanr adamsrm","cluster_3"
-0.9706352151661547,-0.8750638477505207,40.0,33.0,33.0,0.0,2.0,2006.0,115.0,457.0,75.0,97.0,23.0,"J","Sider, T",,,,"Sider, T",,,"Quantifiers and temporal ontology","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"PRESENTISM","Eternalists say that non-present entities (for instance dinosaurs) exist; presentists say that they do not. But some sceptics deny that this debate is genuine, claiming that presentists simply represent eternalists' quantifiers over non-present entities in different notation. This scepticism may be refuted on purely logical grounds: one of the leading candidate 'presentist quantifiers' over non-present things has the inferential role of a quantifier. The dispute over whether non-present objects exist is as genuine and non-verbal as the dispute over whether there is life on other planets.","Rutgers State Univ, Dept Philosophy, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA","Sider, T (reprint author), Rutgers State Univ, Dept Philosophy, 26 Nichol Ave, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA.","sider@philosophy.rutgers.edu",,,,,"ARMSTRONG DM, 1978, THEORY UNIVERSALS, V2; Armstrong David M, 1978, NOMINALISM REALISM, VI; Armstrong D. M., 1989, UNIVERSALS OPINIONAT; Broad C. D., 1923, SCI THOUGHT; Carnap Rudolf, 1950, REV INT PHILOS, V4, P20; CARTWRIGHT RL, 1994, NOUS, V28, P1, DOI 10.2307/2215917 ; Cresswell M., 1990, ENTITIES INDICES; Cresswell M.J., 1996, NEW INTRO MODAL LOGI; FEIGL H, 1962, MINNESOTA STUDIES PH, V3, P527; Forbes Graeme, 1985, METAPHYSICS MODALITY; Goodman Nelson, 1951, STRUCTURE APPEARANCE; HIRSCH E, 2002, PHILOS ISSUES, V12, P51; LEWIS D, 1983, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V61, P343, DOI 10.1080/00048408312341131 ; Lewis D., 1986, PLURALITY WORLDS; Lewis David K, 1999, PAPERS METAPHYSICS E; Lombard LB, 1999, PHILOSOPHIA, V27, P253, DOI 10.1007/BF02381006 ; Loux M.J., 2003, OXFORD HDB METAPHYSI; Mellor D. H., 1998, REAL TIME; MERRICKS T, 1994, J PHILOS, V91, P165, DOI 10.2307/2940769 ; Prior A, 1968, PAPERS TIME TENSE, P7; Prior A, 1970, STUD GEN, V23, P245; Putnam H., 1987, MANY FACES REALISM; PUTNAM H, 1987, DIALECTICA, V41, P41; Quine Willard Van Orman, 1960, WORD OBJECT; Russell B., 1915, MONIST, V25, P212, DOI DOI 10.5840/MONIST191525217; SAVITT S, UNPUB PRESENTISM ETE; SELLARS W, 1962, MINN STUD PHILOS SCI, V3, P527; Sider T, 2004, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V68, P642, DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2004.tb00371.x ; Sider T, 1999, J PHILOS, V96, P325, DOI 10.2307/2564601 ; SIDER T, 2004, PHILOS PHENOMENOLOGI, V68, P674; SIDER T, UNPUB ONTOLOGICAL RE; Sider T., 2001, 4 DIMENSIONALISM; SMART J J C, 1949, Mind, V58, P483; SOSA E, 1993, J PHILOS, V90, P605, DOI 10.2307/2940814 ; TOMBERLIN J, 2001, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V15; TOMBERLIN JE, 1996, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V10; TOOLEY M., 1997, TIME TENSE CAUSATION; Williamson Timothy, 2003, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V17, P415, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1520-8583.2003.00017.X; ZIMMERMAN DW, 2002, MIDW DIV APA; Zimmerman D.W., 2004, OXFORD STUDIES METAP, V1","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzl075",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","027RT","WOS:000236433800004",,,,,"2018-01-02",140.0,"armstrongdavidm armstrongdm broadcd carnaprudolf cartwrightrl cresswellm cresswellmj feiglh forbesgraeme goodmannelson hirsche lewisd lewisd lewisdavidk lombardlb louxmj mellordh merrickst priora priora putnamh putnamh quinewillardvanorman russellb savitts sellarsw sidert sidert sidert sidert sidert smartjjc sosae tomberlinj tomberlinje tooleym williamsontimothy zimmermandw zimmermandw armstrongdm","cluster_3"
-0.4797352834080652,-0.3782648284130035,17.0,33.0,33.0,0.0,2.0,2002.0,111.0,441.0,15.0,36.0,22.0,"J","Divers, J; Melia, J",,,,"Divers, J; Melia, J",,,"The analytic limit of genuine modal realism","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"According to the Geniune Modal Realist, there is a plurality of possible worlds, each world nothing more than a maximally inter-related spatiotemporal sum. One advantage claimed for this position is that it offers us the resources to analyse, in a non-circular manner, the modal operators. In this paper, we argue that the prospects for such an analysis are poor. For the analysis of necessity as truth in all worlds to succeed it is not enough that no modal concepts be used in the realist's account of a possible world (a fact we grant); rather, such an analysis will succeed only if the set of worlds that is postulated is complete. By appealing to plausible truths about the number of possible alien natural properties, we show that there are serious difficulties in guaranteeing that such a set exists without taking some modal concept as primitive. Accordingly, at least in its current form, Genuine Modal Realism must curtail its analytic ambitions.","Univ Leeds, Sch Philos, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England","Divers, J (reprint author), Univ Leeds, Sch Philos, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England.",,,,,,"Adams RM, 1974, NOUS, V8, P211; Bigelow J., 1990, SCI NECESSITY; CHIHARA C, 1998, WORLDS POSSIBILITY; Divers J, 1999, MIND, V108, P217, DOI 10.1093/mind/108.430.217 ; Forbes Graeme, 1989, LANGUAGES POSSIBILIT; Forbes Graeme, 1985, METAPHYSICS MODALITY; LEWIS D, 1986, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V64, P25, DOI 10.1080/00048408612342211 ; Lewis D., 1986, PLURALITY WORLDS; Loux M., 1979, POSSIBLE ACTUAL; Lycan W. G., 1979, POSSIBLE ACTUAL, P274; LYCAN WG, 1991, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V69, P212, DOI 10.1080/00048409112344651 ; LYCAN WG, 1991, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V91, P215; LYCAN WG, 1988, J PHILOS, V85, P42, DOI 10.2307/2026901 ; MILLER RB, 1993, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V71, P159, DOI 10.1080/00048409312345162 ; Miller Richard, 1989, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V67, P467; PLANTINGA A, 1947, NATURE NECESSITY; PRIOR A, 1976, WORLDS TIMES SELVES","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/111.441.15",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","528BC","WOS:000174222700003",,,,,"2018-01-02",141.0,"bigelowj chiharac diversj forbesgraeme forbesgraeme lewisd lewisd louxm lycanwg lycanwg lycanwg lycanwg millerrb millerrichard plantingaa priora adamsrm","cluster_3"
-0.4310263513505364,-0.44578637329733745,18.0,33.0,34.0,0.0,0.0,2001.0,110.0,440.0,905.0,935.0,31.0,"J","Graff, D",,,,"Graff, D",,,"Phenomenal continua and the Sorites","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"I argue that, contrary to widespread philosophical opinion, phenomenal indiscriminability is transitive. For if it were not transitive, we would be precluded from accepting the truisms that if two things look the same then the way they look is the same and that if two things look the same then if one looks red, so does the other. Nevertheless, it has seemed obvious to many philosopher (e.g., Goodman, Armstrong and Dummett) that phenomenal indiscriminability is not transitive; and, moreover, that this non-transitivity is straightforwardly revealed to us in experience. I show this thought to be wrong. All inference from the character of our experience to the non-transitivity of indiscriminability involve either a misunderstanding of continuity, a mistaken interpretation of the idea that we have limited powers of discrimination, or tendentious claims about what our our experience is really like; or such inferences are based on inadequately supported premisses, which though individually plausible are jointly implausible.","Cornell Univ, Sage Sch Philos, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA","Graff, D (reprint author), Cornell Univ, Sage Sch Philos, 218 Goldwin Smith Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA.",,,,,,"ARMSTRONG DM, 1968, MATERIALIST THEORY M; Clark A., 1993, SENSORY QUALITIES; Dummett Michael, 1978, TRUTH OTHER ENIGMAS; Dummett M., 1975, SYNTHESE, V30, P301; Everett A, 1996, SYNTHESE, V106, P205, DOI 10.1007/BF00413700 ; GOODMAN N, 1951, STRUCTURE APEPARANCE; GOODMAN N, 1977, STRUCTURE APEPARANCE; Graff D., 2002, PHILOS TOPICS, V28, P45; HARDIN CL, 1988, NOUS, V22, P213, DOI 10.2307/2215860 ; Jackson Frank, 1977, PERCEPTION REPRESENT; Jackson Frank, 1973, MIND, V82, P269; PARIKH R, 1983, BOSTON STUDIES PHILO, V31, P241; PEACOCKE C, 1981, SYNTHESE, V46, P121, DOI 10.1007/BF01064468 ; Soames S., 1999, UNDERSTANDING TRUTH; TAPPENDEN J, 1993, J PHILOS, V90, P551, DOI 10.2307/2940846 ; TRAVIS C, 1985, MIND, V94, P345; Williamson T., 1990, IDENTITY DISCRIMINAT; Wright Crispin, 1975, SYNTHESE, V30, P325, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00485049","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/110.440.905",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","488MJ","WOS:000171940000001",,,,,"2018-01-02",142.0,"clarka dummettmichael dummettm everetta goodmann goodmann graffd hardincl jacksonfrank jacksonfrank parikhr peacockec soamess tappendenj travisc williamsont wrightcrispin armstrongdm","cluster_0"
-0.5996203495951645,-0.48796467055884973,17.0,33.0,33.0,0.0,1.0,1999.0,108.0,430.0,217.0,239.0,23.0,"J","Divers, J",,,,"Divers, J",,,"A genuine realist theory of advanced modalizing","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"FICTIONALISM",,"Univ Leeds, Sch Philos, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England","Divers, J (reprint author), Univ Leeds, Sch Philos, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England.",,,,,,"BIGELOW J, 1990, DIALOGUE-CAN PHILOS, V29, P205, DOI 10.1017/S001221730001297X ; Bigelow J., 1988, REALITY NUMBERS; Divers J, 1997, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V97, P141, DOI 10.1111/1467-9264.00010 ; DIVERS J, IN PRESS NOUS; KIM J, 1984, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V45, P153, DOI 10.2307/2107423 ; LEWIS D, 1992, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V70, P211, DOI 10.1080/00048409212345101 ; Lewis David, PHILOS PAPERS; Lewis D., 1973, COUNTERFACTUALS; LEWIS D, PLURALITY WORLDS; LEWIS DK, 1968, J PHILOS, V65, P113, DOI 10.2307/2024555 ; Lewis D.K., 1991, PARTS CLASSES; MENZIES P, 1994, ANALYSIS, V54, P26; NOONAN HW, 1994, ANALYSIS, V54, P133, DOI 10.2307/3328661; ROSEN G, 1990, MIND, V99, P327; SHALKOWSKI SA, 1994, PHILOS REV, V103, P669, DOI 10.2307/2186101 ; SKYRMS B, 1976, PHILOS STUD, V30, P323, DOI 10.1007/BF00357930 ; YAGISAWA T, 1988, PHILOS STUD, V53, P175, DOI 10.1007/BF00354640","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/108.430.217",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","190AT","WOS:000079939900001",,,,,"2018-01-02",143.0,"bigelowj diversj diversj kimj lewisd lewisdavid lewisd lewisd lewisdk lewisdk menziesp noonanhw roseng shalkowskisa skyrmsb yagisawat bigelowj","cluster_3"
-0.38257293490419036,-0.31897652262709925,24.0,33.0,33.0,1.0,1.0,1998.0,107.0,425.0,1.0,32.0,32.0,"J","Bealer, G",,,,"Bealer, G",,,"Propositions","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"Univ Colorado, Dept Philosophy, Boulder, CO 80309 USA","Bealer, G (reprint author), Univ Colorado, Dept Philosophy, Boulder, CO 80309 USA.",,,,,,"Adams RM, 1974, NOUS, V8, P211; BEALER G, 1979, J PHILOS, V76, P634, DOI 10.2307/2025697 ; BEALER G, 1989, LINGUIST PHILOS, V12, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF00627396 ; BEALER G, 1983, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V48, P415, DOI 10.2307/2273559 ; BEALER G, 1993, J PHILOS, V90, P5, DOI 10.2307/2940824 ; Bealer G., 1987, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V1, P289, DOI DOI 10.2307/2214149; Bealer George, 1989, HDB PHILOS LOGIC, V4, P133; BEALER G, 1998, PHILOS ISSUES, V8; Bealer G., 1982, QUALITY AND CONCEPT; BEALER G, 1998, CONT READINGS F META; BILGRAMI A, 1992, BELIEF MEANING; Burge T., 1979, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V4, P73; Davies M., 1981, MEANING QUANTIFICATI; Fine K., 1994, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V8, P1, DOI DOI 10.2307/2214160; GEACH PT, 1967, J PHILOS, V64, P627, DOI 10.2307/2024459 ; Jubien Michael, 1988, PHILOS ANAL, P299; Kamp Hans, 1993, DISCOURSE LOGIC INTR; KATZ JJ, 1994, PHILOS REV, V103, P1, DOI 10.2307/2185871 ; Kripke S., 1979, MEANING USE, P239; KRIPKE S., 1980, NAMING NECESSITY; NEALE S, 1990, J PHILOS, V87, P113, DOI 10.2307/2026632 ; PLANTINGA A, 1983, PHILOS STUD, V44, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF00353411 ; SCHIFFER S, 1992, J PHILOS, V89, P499, DOI 10.2307/2941005 ; SCHIFFER S, 1994, NOUS, V28, P279, DOI 10.2307/2216061","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/107.425.1",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","YT694","WOS:000071633700001",,,,,"2018-01-02",144.0,"bealerg bealerg bealerg bealerg bealerg bealergeorge bealerg bealerg bealerg bilgramia burget daviesm finek geachpt jubienmichael kamphans katzjj kripkes kripkes neales plantingaa schiffers schiffers adamsrm","cluster_0"
-0.6623764327624732,-0.4137084291089335,11.0,33.0,33.0,0.0,2.0,1996.0,105.0,418.0,303.0,313.0,11.0,"J","LEWIS, D",,,,"LEWIS, D",,,"DESIRE AS BELIEF .2.","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"LEWIS, D (reprint author), PRINCETON UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,PRINCETON,NJ 08544, USA.",,,,,,"ARLOCOSTA H, 1995, ANALYSIS, V55, P2; ARMSTRONG DM, WHAT IS LAW NATURE; GOODMAN N., 1955, FACT FICTION FORECAS; Hume David, 1739, TREATISE HUMAN NATUR; JACKSON F, 1995, PHILOS Q, V45, P451; LEWIS D, 1988, MIND, V97, P323; LEWIS D, 1981, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V59, P5, DOI 10.1080/00048408112340011 ; Lewis D., 1972, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V50, P249, DOI 10.1080/00048407212341301; ODDIE G, 1989, MIND, V103, P119; PRICE H, 1989, MIND, V98, P119; RAILTON P, 1992, PHILOS PHENOMENOLOGI, V53, P961","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/105.418.303",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","UG797","WOS:A1996UG79700005",,,,,"2018-01-02",145.0,"armstrongdm goodmann humedavid jacksonf lewisd lewisd lewisd oddieg priceh railtonp arlocostah","cluster_3"
-0.5884943613035512,-0.34999438193435817,15.0,33.0,34.0,0.0,1.0,1993.0,102.0,405.0,133.0,146.0,14.0,"J","NOONAN, HW",,,,"NOONAN, HW",,,"CONSTITUTION IS IDENTITY","MIND",,,"English","Discussion",,,,,,,,,,"NOONAN, HW (reprint author), UNIV BIRMINGHAM,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,POB 363,BIRMINGHAM B15 2TT,W MIDLANDS,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"Chisholm Roderick, 1986, RM CHISHOLM; Geach Peter Thomas, 1980, REFERENCE GENERALITY; GIBBARD A, 1976, J PHILOS LOGIC, V4, P187; Gupta A., 1980, LOGIC COMMON NOUNS; Hughes C., 1986, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V85, P213; JOHNSTON M, 1992, MIND, V101, P89, DOI 10.1093/mind/101.401.89 ; Lewis D., 1983, PHILOS PAPERS, V1; Lewis D., 1971, J PHILOS, V68, P203, DOI DOI 10.2307/2024902; Lewis D., 1986, PLURALITY WORLDS; NOONAN HW, 1991, PHILOS QUART, V41, P183, DOI 10.2307/2219592 ; ROBINSON D, 1985, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V63, P299, DOI 10.1080/00048408512341901 ; ROBINSON D, 1982, PHILOS REV, V91, P317, DOI 10.2307/2184688 ; Simons P. M., 1991, EXISTENCE EXPLANATIO, P131; Sosa E., 1987, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V1; UNGER P, 1981, MIDWEST STUDIES PHIL, V6","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/102.405.133",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","KK060","WOS:A1993KK06000007",,,,,"2018-01-02",146.0,"geachpeterthomas gibbarda guptaa hughesc johnstonm lewisd lewisd lewisd noonanhw robinsond robinsond simonspm sosae ungerp chisholmroderick","cluster_3"
-0.19748235597478364,-0.6941057630669937,27.0,33.0,33.0,0.0,1.0,1991.0,100.0,397.0,35.0,52.0,18.0,"J","BALDWIN, T",,,,"BALDWIN, T",,,"THE IDENTITY THEORY OF TRUTH","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"BALDWIN, T (reprint author), UNIV CAMBRIDGE,FAC PHILOSOPHY,CAMBRIDGE CB3 9DA,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"Adorno Theodor, 1973, NEGATIVE DIALECTICS; Baldwin T., 1990, GE MOORE; Bradley F. H, 1922, PRINCIPLES LOGIC; BRADLEY F. H., 1914, ESSAYS TRUTH REALITY; Bradley F. H., 1897, APPEARANCE REALITY; CANDLISH S, 1989, MIND, V98, P331; CANDLISH S, 1984, PHILOS FH BRADLEY; Evans G., 1982, VARIETIES REFERENCE; Frege G., 1918, PHILOS LOGIC; GRIFFIN N, 1980, SYNTHESE, V45, P117, DOI 10.1007/BF00413988 ; HEAL BJ, 1989, FACT EXISTENCE; HEGEL G. W. F., ENCY PHILOS SCI; HEIDEGGER M, ESSENCE TRUTH; Lewis D., 1986, PLURALITY WORLDS; Moore G. E., 1899, MIND, V8, P176; Moore G. E., 1953, SOME MAIN PROBLEMS P; MOORE GE, 1901, DICT PHILOS PSYCHOL; Rorty R., 1989, CONTINGENCY IRONY SO; RUSSELL B, 1984, THEORY KNOWLEDGE; RUSSELL B, 1906, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC; RUSSELL B, 1973, ESSAYS ANAL; Russell B., 1910, PHILOS ESSAYS; Russell Bertrand, 1956, LOGIC KNOWLEDGE; Russell B., 1903, PRINCIPLES MATH; Russel B, 1905, MIND, V14, P479, DOI DOI 10.1093/MIND/XIV.4.479; Salmon N, 1986, FREGES PUZZLE; Stout G. F., 1930, STUDIES PHILOS PSYCH","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","EW928","WOS:A1991EW92800003",,,,,"2018-01-02",147.0,"baldwint bradleyfh bradleyfh bradleyfh candlishs candlishs evansg fregeg griffinn healbj hegelgwf heideggerm lewisd moorege moorege moorege rortyr russellb russellb russellb russellb russellbertrand russellb russelb salmonn stoutgf adornotheodor","cluster_3"
-0.4141905134034615,-0.23482027620984938,7.0,33.0,33.0,0.0,0.0,1989.0,98.0,389.0,119.0,127.0,9.0,"J","PRICE, H",,,,"PRICE, H",,,"DEFENDING DESIRE-AS-BELIEF","MIND",,,"English","Letter",,,,,,,,,,"PRICE, H (reprint author), AUSTRALIAN NATL UNIV,RES SCH SOCIAL SCI,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,CANBERRA,ACT 2600,AUSTRALIA.",,,,,,"COLLINS J, 1988, MIND, P333; LEVI I, IN PRESS SYNTHESE; LEWIS D, 1988, MIND, P323; SEARLE J, 1979, EXPRESSION MEANING, P3; SMITH M, 1988, MIND, P589; SMITH M, 1988, UNPUB; SMITH M, 1987, MIND, P36","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","T2314","WOS:A1989T231400007",,,,,"2018-01-02",148.0,"levii lewisd searlej smithm smithm smithm collinsj","cluster_3"
-0.6816492158992482,-0.3761997465083604,34.0,32.0,32.0,0.0,2.0,2009.0,118.0,470.0,323.0,351.0,29.0,"J","Clarke, R",,,,"Clarke, Randolph",,,"Dispositions, Abilities to Act, and Free Will: The New Dispositionalism","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"VOLITION","This paper examines recent attempts to revive a classic compatibilist position on free will, according to which having an ability to perform a certain action is having a certain disposition. Since having unmanifested dispositions is compatible with determinism, having unexercised abilities to act, it is held, is likewise compatible. Here it is argued that although there is a kind of capacity to act possession of which is a matter of having a disposition, the new dispositionalism leaves unresolved the main points of dispute concerning free will.","Florida State Univ, Dept Philosophy, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA","Clarke, R (reprint author), Florida State Univ, Dept Philosophy, 151 Dodd Hall, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA.","rkclarke@fsu.edu",,,,,"ADAMS F, 1992, CAN J PHILOS, V22, P323; Austin John L., 1956, PHILOS PAPERS, P205; Bird A, 1998, PHILOS QUART, V48, P227, DOI 10.1111/1467-9213.00098 ; Brand M., 1984, INTENDING ACTING NAT; Choi S, 2006, SYNTHESE, V148, P369, DOI 10.1007/s11229-004-6229-z; CLARKE R, 1994, PAC PHILOS QUART, V75, P1; Fara M, 2008, MIND, V117, P843, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzn078; Fischer John Martin, 1998, RESPONSIBILITY CONTR; Frankfurt H., 1988, IMPORTANCE WHAT WE C, P1; Hobart R. E., 1934, MIND, V43, P1; JOHNSTON M, 1992, PHILOS STUD, V68, P221, DOI 10.1007/BF00694847 ; Kane R., 1996, SIGNIFICANCE FREE WI; Kane R. H., 2002, OXFORD HDB FREE WILL; Lehrer K, 1968, ANALYSIS, V29, P29, DOI DOI 10.1093/ANALYS/29.1.29; Lewi H, 2008, ARCHIT THEORY REV, V13, P145, DOI 10.1080/13264820802216536; Lewis D, 1997, PHILOS QUART, V47, P143, DOI 10.1111/1467-9213.00052 ; LOCKE D, 1973, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V74, P171; MARTIN CB, 1994, PHILOS QUART, V44, P1, DOI 10.2307/2220143 ; MCCANN H, 1975, REV METAPHYS, V28, P423; MCCANN HJ, 1998, WORKS AGENCY HUMAN A, P170; Mele A., 1992, SPRINGS ACTION UNDER; Mele A., 2006, FREE WILL LUCK; Mele A. R., 2003, MOTIVATION AGENCY; Molnar George, 2003, POWERS STUDY METAPHY; Pereboom Derk, 2001, LIVING FREE WILL; PINK T, ETHICS ACTI IN PRESS, V1; Pink T., 2004, FREE WILL VERY SHORT; SMART JJC, 1961, MIND, V70, P291; Stroud S., 2003, WEAKNESS WILL PRACTI; Van Inwagen Peter, 2008, J ETHICS, V12, P327, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10892-008-9038-7; van Inwagen P, 1983, ESSAY FREE WILL; Vihvelin Kadri, 2004, PHILOS TOPICS, V32, P427, DOI DOI 10.5840/PHILTOPICS2004321/211; Watson Gary, 2003, FREE WILL; Widerker D., 2003, MORAL RESPONSIBILITY","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzp034",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","473WW","WOS:000268243400003",,,,,"2018-01-02",149.0,"austinjohnl birda brandm chois clarker faram fischerjohnmartin frankfurth hobartre johnstonm kaner kanerh lehrerk lewih lewisd locked martincb mccannh mccannhj melea melea melear molnargeorge pereboomderk pinkt pinkt smartjjc strouds vaninwagenpeter vaninwagenp vihvelinkadri watsongary widerkerd adamsf","cluster_3"
-0.39340921756347275,-0.3187355676070396,104.0,32.0,32.0,0.0,0.0,2007.0,116.0,464.0,805.0,850.0,46.0,"J","Collins, J",,,,"Collins, John",,,"Syntax, more or less","MIND",,,"English","Review",,,,,,,"UNARTICULATED CONSTITUENTS; STRUCTURED PROPOSITIONS; PRAGMATICS; LANGUAGE; CONTEXT; STANLEY; SZABO; BACH","Much of the best contemporary work in the philosophy of language and content makes appeal to the theories developed in generative syntax. In particular, there is a presumption that - at some level and in some way - the structures provided by syntactic theory mesh with or support our conception of content/linguistic meaning as grounded in our first-person understanding of our communicative speech acts. This paper will suggest that there is no such tight fit. Its claim will be that, if recent generative theories are on the right lines, syntactic structure provides both too much and too little to serve as the structural partner for content, at least as that notion is generally understood in philosophy. The paper will substantiate these claims by an assessment of the recent work of King, Stanley, and others.","[Collins, John] Univ E Anglia, Sch Philosophy, Norwich NR4 7JT, Norfolk, England","Collins, J (reprint author), Univ E Anglia, Sch Philosophy, Norwich NR4 7JT, Norfolk, England.",,,,,,"ABRAHAM W, 1996, MINIMAL IDEAS SYNTAC; Antony L. M, 2003, CHOMSKY HIS CRITICS; Bach K, 2000, MIND LANG, V15, P262, DOI 10.1111/1468-0017.00131 ; Baker M., 1988, INCORPORATION THEORY; Baker Mark, 2003, LEXICAL CATEGORIES V; BALTIN Mark, 2001, HDB CONT SYNTACTIC T; Barber Alex, 2003, EPISTEMOLOGY LANGUAG; Barbosa P., 1998, IS BEST GOOD ENOUGH; Belletti Adriana, 2004, STRUCTURES CARTOGRAP, V3; Bezuidenhout Anne, 2004, DESCRIPTIONS; BLAIR D, 2005, PROTOSOCIOLOGY, V21, P88; Boeckx C, 2001, NAT LANG LINGUIST TH, V19, P503, DOI 10.1023/A:1010646425448 ; Borer Hagit, 2005, NORMAL COURSE EVENTS, VII; Breheny R, 2002, MIND LANG, V17, P169, DOI 10.1111/1468-0017.00194 ; Cappelen H, 2002, ANALYSIS, V62, P271, DOI 10.1111/1467-8284.00367 ; Cappelen H., 2005, INSENSITIVE SEMANTIC; Carston R, 2002, MIND LANG, V17, P127, DOI 10.1111/1468-0017.00192 ; Carston R., 2002, THOUGHTS UTTERANCES; Chomsky N, 2005, LINGUIST INQ, V36, P1, DOI 10.1162/0024389052993655 ; CHOMSKY N, 1977, LINGUIST INQ, V8, P425; Chomsky Noam, 1980, RULES REPRESENTATION; Chomsky Noam, 1986, BARRIERS; Chomsky N., 1977, ESSAYS FORM INTERPRE; Chomsky Noam, 1986, KNOWLEDGE LANGUAGE; CHOMSKY N, 1972, STUDIES SEMANTICS GE; Chomsky N., 1996, POWERS PROSPECTS REF; Chomsky N., 1957, SYNTACTIC STRUCTURES; Chomsky Noam, 1981, LECT GOVT BINDING; Chomsky N., 1965, ASPECTS THEORY SYNTA; CHOMSKY N, 1995, MINIMALIST PROGRAM; Chomsky N., 2000, NEW HORIZONS STUDY L; Chomsky Noam, 1955, LOGICAL STRUCTURE LI; Chomsky Noam, 1975, REFLECTIONS LANGUAGE; CHOMSKY N, 2005, UNPUB ON PHASES; Chomsky N, 2004, GENERATIVE ENTERPRISE REVISITED, pIX; CRIMMINS M, 1989, J PHILOS, V86, P685, DOI 10.2307/2027014 ; DenDikken M, 2006, LINGUIST INQ MONOGR, V47, P1; ELGARDO R, 2004, MIND LANG, V19, P442; EPSTEIN S., 2002, DERIVATION EXPLANATI; EPSTEIN S. D., 1999, WORKING MINIMALISM; Epstein Samuel David, 1998, DERIVATIONAL APPROAC; Epstein S. D., 2006, DERIVATIONS MINIMALI; EVERAERT M, 2006, BLACKWELL COMPANION, V2; Fodor JA, 2001, MIND LANG, V16, P1, DOI 10.1111/1468-0017.00153 ; Fox Danny, 2000, EC SEMANTIC INTERPRE; Grice P., 1989, STUDIES WAYS WORDS; Haegeman Liliane, 1997, HDB GENERATIVE SYNTA; HALE K, 2001, PROLEGOMENON THEORY; HARMAN G, 1974, FDN LANGUAGE, V9, P38; HENDRICK R, 2003, MINIMALIST SYNTAX; HIGGINBOTHAM J, 1985, LINGUIST INQ, V16, P547; HORNSTEIN N., 2001, MOVE MINIMALIST THEO; Hornstein Nobert, 1984, LOGIC GRAMMAR APPROA; Hornstein N., 1995, LOGICAL FORM GB MINI; JACKENDOFF R, 1987, LINGUIST INQ, V18, P369; Jackendoff Ray, 1972, SEMANTIC INTERPRETAT; Kayne Richard S., 1994, ANTISYMMETRY SYNTAX; Kempson R, 1988, MENTAL REPRESENTATIO; KENSTOWICZ M, 2001, KEN HALE LIFE LANGUA; KING J, 1996, J PHILOS LOGIC, V25, P495; King J., 2001, COMPLEX DEMONSTRATIV; KING JC, 1995, NOUS, V29, P516, DOI 10.2307/2216285 ; King Jeffrey, 1994, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V19, P53; King J. C., 2007, NATURE STRUCTURE CON; King T, 2005, ATHEROSCLEROSIS SUPP, V6, P111, DOI 10.1016/S1567-5688(05)80440-4 ; KOOPMAN H, 1991, LINGUA, V85, P211, DOI 10.1016/0024-3841(91)90022-W ; Larson Richard, 1995, KNOWLEDGE MEANING IN; LARSON RK, 1993, SYNTHESE, V95, P305, DOI 10.1007/BF01063877 ; Lasnik H., 2005, COURSE MINIMALIST SY; Lepore Ernest, 1986, TRUTH INTERPRETATION; Marti L, 2006, LINGUIST PHILOS, V29, P135, DOI 10.1007/s10988-005-4740-4; Martin R., 2000, STEP STEP ESSAYS MIN; May R., 1977, THESIS MIT; May R., 1985, LOGICAL FORM ITS STR; McGilvray J, 1998, MIND LANG, V13, P225, DOI 10.1111/1468-0017.00076 ; Neale S, 2000, MIND LANG, V15, P284, DOI 10.1111/1468-0017.00132 ; Nunes J, 2004, LINGUIST INQ MONOGR, V43, P1; OTERO C, 2004, N CHOMSKY CRITICAL A; Partee Barbara Hall, 1989, PAPERS CHICAGO LINGU, V25, P342; PERRY J, 1986, SUPPL P ARISTOTELIAN, V60, P137; PIETROSKI P, 2005, EVENTS SEMANTIC ARCH; Preyer Gerhard, 2005, CONTEXTUALISM PHILOS; Preyer Gerhard, 2002, LOGICAL FORM LANGUAG; Pustejovsky J., 1995, GENERATIVE LEXICON; Recanati F, 2002, LINGUIST PHILOS, V25, P299, DOI 10.1023/A:1015267930510 ; RECANATI F., 2004, LITERAL MEANING; RIZZI L, 1986, LINGUIST INQ, V17, P501; ROORYCK J, 1996, PHRASE STRUCTURE LEX; Safir K, 2004, LINGUIST INQ MONOGR, V44, P1; Safir Kenneth, 2004, SYNTAX ANAPHORA; SAUERLAND U, 2007, INTERFACES PLUS RECU; Schiffer S., 1987, REMNANTS MEANING; Soames S., 2002, RIGIDITY UNFINISHED; Stanley J, 2000, MIND LANG, V15, P295, DOI 10.1111/1468-0017.00133 ; Stanley J, 2002, MIND LANG, V17, P149, DOI 10.1111/1468-0017.00193 ; Stanley J, 2001, J PHILOS, V98, P411, DOI 10.2307/2678403 ; Stanley J, 2000, MIND LANG, V15, P219, DOI 10.1111/1468-0017.00130 ; Stanley J, 2000, LINGUIST PHILOS, V23, P391, DOI 10.1023/A:1005599312747 ; Szabo Z. G., 2005, SEMANTICS VERSUS PRA; Taylor KA, 2001, SYNTHESE, V128, P45, DOI 10.1023/A:1010349621943 ; Uriagereka J., 1998, RHYME REASON INTRO M; Uriagereka Juan, 2002, DERIVATIONS EXPLORIN; Webelhuth G., 1995, GOVT BINDING THEORY; WILLIAMS E, 1985, NATURAL LANGUAGE LIN, V3, P397","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423","1460-2113",,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzm805",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","239VB","WOS:000251545300001",,,,,"2018-01-02",150.0,"antonylm bachk bakerm bakermark baltinmark barberalex barbosap bellettiadriana bezuidenhoutanne blaird boeckxc borerhagit brehenyr cappelenh cappelenh carstonr carstonr chomskyn chomskyn chomskynoam chomskynoam chomskyn chomskynoam chomskyn chomskyn chomskyn chomskynoam chomskyn chomskyn chomskyn chomskynoam chomskynoam chomskyn chomskyn crimminsm dendikkenm elgardor epsteins epsteinsd epsteinsamueldavid epsteinsd everaertm fodorja foxdanny gricep haegemanliliane halek harmang hendrickr higginbothamj hornsteinn hornsteinnobert hornsteinn jackendoffr jackendoffray kaynerichards kempsonr kenstowiczm kingj kingj kingjc kingjeffrey kingjc kingt koopmanh larsonrichard larsonrk lasnikh leporeernest martil martinr mayr mayr mcgilvrayj neales nunesj oteroc parteebarbarahall perryj pietroskip preyergerhard preyergerhard pustejovskyj recanatif recanatif rizzil rooryckj safirk safirkenneth sauerlandu schiffers soamess stanleyj stanleyj stanleyj stanleyj stanleyj szabozg taylorka uriagerekaj uriagerekajuan webelhuthg williamse abrahamw","cluster_0"
-0.2997117528773977,0.1776585935541144,27.0,32.0,32.0,0.0,1.0,2007.0,116.0,464.0,875.0,902.0,28.0,"J","Faulkner, P",,,,"Faulkner, Paul",,,"On telling and trusting","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"TESTIMONY","A key debate in the epistemology of testimony concerns when it is reasonable to acquire belief through accepting what a speaker says. This debate has been largely understood as the debate over how much, or little, assessment and monitoring an audience must engage in. When it is understood in this way the debate simply ignores the relationship speaker and audience can have. Interlocutors rarely adopt the detached approach to communication implied by talk of assessment and monitoring. Audiences trust speakers to be truthful and demonstrate certain reactive attitudes if they are not. Trust and the accompanying willingness to these reactive attitudes can then provide speakers with a reason to be trustworthy. So through ignoring interlocutors' engagement with the communicative process, the existing debate misses the possibility that it is an audience's trusting a speaker that makes it reasonable for the audience to accept what the speaker says.","[Faulkner, Paul] Univ Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England","Faulkner, P (reprint author), Univ Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England.","paul.faulkner@shef.ac.uk",,,,,"BAIER A, 1986, ETHICS, V96, P231, DOI 10.1086/292745 ; BURGE T, 1993, PHILOS REV, V102, P457, DOI 10.2307/2185680 ; CASTELFRANCHI C, 2001, TRUST DECEPTION VIRT; Coady C. J. A., 1992, TESTIMONY PHILOS STU; Cohen L. J., 1992, ESSAY ACCEPTANCE BEL; Delaney C., 1979, RATIONALITY RELIG BE; Faulkner P, 1998, PAC PHILOS QUART, V79, P302, DOI 10.1111/1468-0114.00065 ; Faulkner P, 2002, SYNTHESE, V131, P353, DOI 10.1023/A:1016116728471 ; FAULKNER P, IN PRESS PHILOS PHEN, V75; FAULKNER P, 2007, IN PRESS EPISTEME; Gambetta D., 1988, TRUST MAKING BREAKIN; GRICE P, 1957, STUDIES WAY WORDS, P377; Hardin Russell, 2006, TRUST; Hollis M., 1998, TRUST REASON; HOLTON R, 1994, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V72, P63, DOI 10.1080/00048409412345881 ; Horsburgh H. J. N., 1960, PHILOS Q, V10, P343; Hume David, 1777, ENQUIRIES CONCERNING; Jones K, 1996, ETHICS, V107, P4, DOI 10.1086/233694 ; Lackey J, 2006, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V73, P77, DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2006.tb00605.x ; Lewis D. K., 1969, CONVENTION PHILOS ST; McEwan Ian, 1997, ENDURING LOVE; Richard Moran, 2006, EPISTEMOLOGY TESTIMO, V5, P272; PETTIT P, 1990, PHILOS REV, V99, P565, DOI 10.2307/2185617 ; Pettit P, 1995, PHILOS PUBLIC AFF, V24, P202, DOI 10.1111/j.1088-4963.1995.tb00029.x ; PRICE HH, 1969, GIFFORD LECT 1960; Wallace R. J., 1994, RESPONSIBILITY MORAL; Williams B., 2002, TRUTH TRUTHFULNESS","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzm875",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","239VB","WOS:000251545300003",,,,,"2018-01-02",151.0,"burget castelfranchic coadycja cohenlj delaneyc faulknerp faulknerp faulknerp faulknerp gambettad gricep hardinrussell hollism holtonr horsburghhjn humedavid jonesk lackeyj lewisdk mcewanian richardmoran pettitp pettitp pricehh wallacerj williamsb baiera","cluster_6"
-0.013189127744323145,0.07970621006053578,3.0,32.0,32.0,0.0,0.0,2007.0,116.0,462.0,371.0,385.0,15.0,"J","Kolodny, N",,,,"Kolodny, Niko",,,"State or process requirements?","MIND",,,"English","Editorial Material",,,,,,,,"In his 'Wide or Narrow Scope?', John Broome questions my contention in 'Why Be Rational?' that certain rational requirements are narrow scope. The source of our disagreement, I suspect, is that Broome believes that the relevant rational requirements govern states, whereas I believe that they govern processes. If they govern states, then the debate over scope is sterile. The difference between narrow- and wide-scope state requirements is only as important as the difference between not violating a requirement and satisfying one. Broome's observations about conflicting narrow-scope state requirements only corroborate this. Why, then, have we thought that there was an important difference? Perhaps, I conjecture, because there is an important difference between narrow- and wide-scope process requirements, and we have implicitly taken process requirements as our topic. I clarify and try to defend my argument that some process requirements are narrow scope, so that if there were reasons to conform to rational requirements, there would be implausible bootstrapping. I then reformulate Broome's observations about conflicting narrow-scope state requirements as an argument against narrow-scope process requirements, and suggest a reply.","Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA","Kolodny, N (reprint author), Univ Calif Berkeley, 314 Moses Hall 2390, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.","kolodny@berkeley.edu",,,,,"Belnap N.D., 2001, FACING FUTURE AGENTS; Broome J, 2007, MIND, V116, P359, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzm359; Kolodny N, 2005, MIND, V114, P509, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzi223","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzm371",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","154MK","WOS:000245511400006",,,,,"2018-01-02",152.0,"broomej kolodnyn belnapnd","cluster_6"
-1.1704569570237617,-0.9960762794867533,43.0,32.0,32.0,0.0,1.0,2000.0,109.0,434.0,199.0,240.0,42.0,"J","Lepore, E; Ludwig, K",,,,"Lepore, E; Ludwig, K",,,"The semantics and pragmatics of complex demonstratives","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"Complex demonstratives, expressions of the form 'That F,' 'These Fs,' etc., have traditionally been taken to be referring terms. Yet they exhibit many of the features of quantified noun phrases. This has led some philosophers to suggest that demonstrative determiners are a special kind of quantifier, which can be paraphrased using a context sensitive definite description. Both these views contain elements of the truth, though each is mistaken. We advance a novel account of the semantic form of complex demonstratives that shows how to reconcile the view that they function like quantified noun phrases with the view that simple demonstratives function as context sensitive referring terms wherever they occur. If we are right, previous accounts of complex demonstratives have misconceived their semantic role; and philosophers relying on the majority view in employing complex demonstratives in analysis have proceeded on a false assumption.","Rutgers State Univ, Ctr Cognit Sci, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA; Univ Florida, Dept Philosophy, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA","Lepore, E (reprint author), Rutgers State Univ, Ctr Cognit Sci, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA.",,,"Ludwig, Kirk/0000-0002-9037-6292",,,"Almog J., 1989, THEMES KAPLAN; BARWISE J, 1981, LINGUIST PHILOS, V4, P159, DOI 10.1007/BF00350139 ; Borg E., 2000, PHILOS STUD, V97, P225; BRAUN D, 1996, NOUS, V30, P145, DOI 10.2307/2216291 ; BRAUN D, 1994, PHILOS STUD, V74, P193, DOI 10.1007/BF00989803 ; Burge T., 1974, J PHILOS, V71, P205; Cole P., 1978, SYNTAX SEMANTICS; DAVIDSON D, 1967, SYNTHESE, V17, P304, DOI 10.1007/BF00485035 ; DAVIDSON D, 1975, SEMANTICS NATURAL LA; DAVIES M, 1982, J PHILOS LOGIC, V11, P287, DOI 10.1007/BF00293432 ; DONELLAN K, 1966, PHILOS REV, V75, P281; DRYER MS, 1992, LANGUAGE, V68, P81, DOI 10.2307/416370; GRICE P., 1989, STUDIES WAY WORDS; HALE B., 1997, COMPANION PHILOS LAN; Higginbotham James, 1988, MENTAL REPRESENTATIO, P29; KAPLAN D, 1989, THEMES KAPLAN, P656; Kaplan David, 1989, THEMES KAPLAN, P481; KAPLAN D, 1978, SYNTAX SEMANTICS, P221; Kempson R, 1988, MENTAL REPRESENTATIO; King JC, 1999, NOUS, V33, P155, DOI 10.1111/0029-4624.00148 ; Koslicki K, 1999, NOUS, V33, P46, DOI 10.1111/0029-4624.00142 ; Larson R., 1995, KNOWLEDGE MEANING; LEPORE E, 1983, SYNTHESE, V54, P167, DOI 10.1007/BF00869390 ; LEPORE E, 2000, TENSE TIME REFERENCE; LEPORE E, UNPUB D DAVIDSON TRU; LEWIS D, 1975, SEMANTICS NATURAL LA, P169; LUDWIG K, 1999, D DAVIDSON TRUTH MEA, P27; MCGINN C, 1981, SYNTHESE, V49, P157, DOI 10.1007/BF01064297 ; Neale S., 1993, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V7, P89; PEACOCKE C, 1981, SYNTHESE, V49, P187, DOI 10.1007/BF01064298 ; PERRY John, 1997, COMPANION PHILOS LAN, P586; Platts M., 1980, REFERENCE TRUTH REAL; Quine Willard Van Orman, 1960, WORD OBJECT; Recanati F., 1993, DIRECT REFERENCE LAN; RICHARD M, 1903, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V7, P207; SCHIFFER S, 1981, SYNTHESE, V57, P43; SMITH Q, 2000, TENSE TIME REFERENCE; Strawson PF, 1950, MIND, V59, P320; TARSKI Alfred, 1935, STUDIA PHILOS, V1, P261; TAYLOR B, 1980, REFERENCE TRUTH REAL, P182; TOMBERLIN J, 1993, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V7; Weinstein Scott, 1974, NOUS, V8, P179; ZEGLEN U., 1999, D DAVIDSON TRUTH MEA","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/109.434.199",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","305CF","WOS:000086520700002",,,,,"2018-01-02",153.0,"barwisej borge braund braund burget colep davidsond davidsond daviesm donellank dryerms gricep haleb higginbothamjames kapland kaplandavid kapland kempsonr kingjc koslickik larsonr leporee leporee leporee lewisd ludwigk mcginnc neales peacockec perryjohn plattsm quinewillardvanorman recanatif richardm schiffers smithq strawsonpf tarskialfred taylorb tomberlinj weinsteinscott zeglenu almogj","cluster_0"
-0.3877578034135586,0.15211590847997947,52.0,32.0,34.0,0.0,1.0,1999.0,108.0,430.0,265.0,290.0,26.0,"J","Lazar, A",,,,"Lazar, A",,,"Deceiving oneself or self-deceived? On the formation of beliefs 'under the influence' (Self-deception, motivational factors)","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"Northwestern Univ, Dept Philosophy, Evanston, IL 60208 USA","Lazar, A (reprint author), Northwestern Univ, Dept Philosophy, Evanston, IL 60208 USA.",,,,,,"Bennett J., 1999, ANALYSIS, V50, P87; BOWER GH, 1981, AM PSYCHOL, V36, P121; Darke S., 1988, COGNITION EMOTION, V2, P145, DOI DOI 10.1080/02699938808408071; DAVIDSON D, 1985, DIALECTICA, V39, P345; DAVIDSON D., 1998, SELF DECEPTION PARAD, P1; Davidson D., 1986, MULTIPLE SELF, P79; DERRYBERRY D, 1988, MOTIV EMOTION, V12, P23, DOI 10.1007/BF00992471; DUNNING D, 1995, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V69, P58, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.58; DUPUY JP, 1998, SELF-DECEPTION PARAD; Elster Jon, 1986, MULTIPLE SELF; FLAUBERT Gustave, MADAME BOVARY; Gardner S., 1993, IRRATIONALITY PHILOS; Gilligan S.G., 1984, EMOTIONS COGNITION B, P547; GUR RC, 1979, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V37, P147; Izard C. E., 1984, EMOTIONS COGNITION B; Johnston M., 1988, PERSPECTIVES SELF DE, P63; KAHNEMAN D, 1972, COGNITIVE PSYCHOL, V3, P430, DOI 10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3 ; KAHNEMAN D, 1973, PSYCHOL REV, V80, P237, DOI 10.1037/h0034747 ; Kahneman D., 1973, ATTENTION EFFORT; KOEHLER DJ, UNPUB EVALUATING ONE; Kramer Peter D., 1993, LISTENING PROZAC; KUNDA Z, 1987, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V53, P636, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.636; KUNDA Z, 1989, J EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V25, P272, DOI 10.1016/0022-1031(89)90023-1; Kunzendorf RG, 1991, MENTAL IMAGERY; LAZAR A, 1997, BEHAVIORAL BRAIN SCI, V20, P9119; LAZAR A., 1998, SELF DECEPTION PARAD, P19; Mackie D., 1993, AFFECT COGNITION STE; MCLAUGHLIN BP, 1988, PERSPECTIVES SELF-DE; Mele AR, 1997, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V20, P91; Mele A.R., 1987, IRRATIONALITY ESSAY; MILL JS, 1874, AUTOBIGORAPHY; Murphy SM, 1990, J MENTAL IMAGERY, V14, P153; Niedenthal P. M., 1994, HEARTS EYE EMOTIONAL; Nisbett R., 1980, HUMAN INFERENCE STRA; PANSKEPP J, 1982, BEHAVIORAL BRAIN SCI, V5, P407; PASCAL Blaise, PENSEES; Pears D., 1984, MOTIVATED IRRATIONAL; Quattrone George A., 1986, MULTIPLE SELF, P35; Oksenberg Rorty A., 1988, PERSPECTIVES SELF DE, P11; ROSENFARB AS, 1992, J SOCIAL CLINICAL PS, V11, P323; SANITIOSO R, 1990, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V59, P1; SIMONS AD, 1993, J ABNORM PSYCHOL, V102, P584, DOI 10.1037/0021-843X.102.4.584; SLIFE BD, 1992, COGNITION EMOTION, V6, P1, DOI 10.1080/02699939208411055 ; Smith D., 1991, MENTAL IMAGERY, P215; SYUBB RN, 1985, BEHAV THERAPIST, V8, P155; TALBOTT WJ, 1995, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V55, P27, DOI 10.2307/2108309 ; TVERSKY A, 1981, SCIENCE, V211, P453, DOI 10.1126/science.7455683 ; TVERSKY A, 1974, SCIENCE, V185, P1124, DOI 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 ; WHISNER W, 1993, PHILOSOPHIA, V22, P223, DOI 10.1007/BF02379646 ; WILLIAMS B, 1973, PROBLEMS SELF, P67; Wollheim Richard, 1984, THREAD LIFE; ZAJONC RB, 1980, AM PSYCHOL, V35, P151, DOI 10.1037//0003-066X.35.2.151","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/108.430.265",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","190AT","WOS:000079939900003",,,,,"2018-01-02",154.0,"bowergh darkes davidsond davidsond davidsond derryberryd dunningd dupuyjp elsterjon flaubertgustave gardners gilligansg gurrc izardce johnstonm kahnemand kahnemand kahnemand koehlerdj kramerpeterd kundaz kundaz kunzendorfrg lazara lazara mackied mclaughlinbp melear melear milljs murphysm niedenthalpm nisbettr panskeppj pascalblaise pearsd quattronegeorgea oksenbergrortya rosenfarbas sanitiosor simonsad slifebd smithd syubbrn talbottwj tverskya tverskya whisnerw williamsb wollheimrichard zajoncrb bennettj","cluster_6"
-1.1196379954320452,-0.8939181015641108,27.0,32.0,33.0,0.0,1.0,1988.0,97.0,388.0,551.0,574.0,24.0,"J","MENZIES, P",,,,"MENZIES, P",,,"AGAINST CAUSAL REDUCTIONISM","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"MENZIES, P (reprint author), UNIV SYDNEY,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,SYDNEY,NSW 2006,AUSTRALIA.",,,,,,"Armstrong D.M, 1978, UNIVERSALS SCI REALI; BLACKBURN S, 1987, EXERCISES ANAL ESSAY, P47; Davidson D., 1969, ESSAYS ACTIONS EVENT, P163; FODOR JA, 1987, PSYCHOSEMANTICS, pCH2; GOLDMAN AI, 1970, THEORY HUMAN ACTION, pCH2; HAUGELAND J, 1982, AM PHILOS Q, P93; HORGAN T, 1982, PAC PHILOS QUART, V63, P29; JACKSON FC, IN PRESS; KIM, 1973, J PHILOS, P217; KIM, 1976, ACTION THEORY WINNIP, P159; KIM, 1978, AM PHILOS Q, P149; KIM, 1984, PHILOS PHENOMENOLOGI, P153; Kim J., 1979, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V4, P31; LEMMON EJ, 1967, LOGIC DECISION ACTIO; LEWIS D, 1983, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V61, P343, DOI 10.1080/00048408312341131 ; LEWIS D, 1986, PHILOS PAPERS, V2, P262; LEWIS DK, 1966, J PHILOS, V63, P17, DOI 10.2307/2024524 ; LEWIS DK, 1972, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, P249; LEWIS DK, 1983, PHILOS STUD, P197; MENZIES, IN PRESS; NAGEL E, 1964, STRUCTURE SCI, P338; PARGETTER R, IN PRESS; PETTIT P, 1987, MIND MORALITY METAPH; PUTNAM, 1979, MIDWEST STUDIES PHIL, V4; Putnam H., 1975, MIND LANGUAGE REALIT, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CB09780511625251, 10.1017/CBO9780511625251]; QUINE W. V., 1981, THEORIES THINGS; SMART JJC, 1972, MONIST, P149","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","R0956","WOS:A1988R095600003",,,,,"2018-01-02",155.0,"blackburns davidsond fodorja goldmanai haugelandj horgant jacksonfc kim kim kim kim kimj lemmonej lewisd lewisd lewisdk lewisdk lewisdk menzies nagele pargetterr pettitp putnam putnamh quinewv smartjjc armstrongdm","cluster_3"
-0.06677503362177173,-0.04300293614209346,19.0,31.0,31.0,0.0,1.0,2003.0,112.0,448.0,601.0,633.0,33.0,"J","Bovens, L; Hartmann, S",,,,"Bovens, L; Hartmann, S",,,"Solving the riddle of coherence","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"Univ Colorado, Dept Philosophy, Boulder, CO 80309 USA; Univ Konstanz, Ctr Jr Res Fellows, D-78457 Constance, Germany; Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Dept Philosophy Log & Sci Method, London WC2A 2AE, England","Bovens, L (reprint author), Univ Colorado, Dept Philosophy, CB 232, Boulder, CO 80309 USA.","luc@bovens.org; s.hartmann@lse.ac.uk",,,,,"Bonjour L, 1999, BLACKWELL GUIDE EPIS, P117; BONJOUR L., 1985, STRUCTURE EMPIRICAL; Bovens L, 2000, MIND, V109, P685, DOI 10.1093/mind/109.436.685 ; Bovens L, 2003, BAYESIAN COHERENTISM; DAWID AP, 1979, J ROY STAT SOC B MET, V41, P1; Ewing A. C., 1934, IDEALISM CRITICAL SU; Fitelson B, 2003, ANALYSIS, V63, P194, DOI 10.1111/1467-8284.00420 ; Gillies D., 2000, PHILOS THEORIES PROB; Kuhn T.S., 1977, ESSENTIAL TENSION, P320; Lewis C. I., 1946, ANAL KNOWLEDGE VALUA; OLSSON E, 2002, J PHILOS, V94, P246; Pearl J., 1988, PROBABILISTIC REASON; Quine Willard Van Orman, 1960, WORD OBJECT; Reichenbach H., 1956, DIRECTION TIME; SALMON WC, 1998, CAUSALITY EXPLANATIO, pCH14; Salmon Wesley, 1990, SCI THEORIES, P175; Shogenji T, 1999, ANALYSIS, V59, P338, DOI 10.1111/1467-8284.00191 ; Spirtes P., 2000, CAUSATION PREDICTION; Suppes P., 2002, REPRESENTATION INVAR","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/112.448.601",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","741JM","WOS:000186455000001",,,,,"2018-01-02",156.0,"bonjourl bovensl bovensl dawidap ewingac fitelsonb gilliesd kuhnts lewisci olssone pearlj quinewillardvanorman reichenbachh salmonwc salmonwesley shogenjit spirtesp suppesp bonjourl","cluster_0"
-0.3238731573163507,-0.3527519104510244,29.0,31.0,31.0,0.0,1.0,2001.0,110.0,438.0,369.0,400.0,32.0,"J","Shagrir, O",,,,"Shagrir, O",,,"Content, comptutation and externalism","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"PERCEPTUAL CONTENT; INDIVIDUALISM; COMPUTATION; VISION; PSYCHOLOGY","This paper presents an extended argument for the claim that mental content impacts the computational individuation of a cognitive system (section 2). The argument starts with the observation that a cognitive system may simultaneously implement a variety of different syntactic structures, but that the computational identity of a cognitive system is given by only one of these implemented syntactic structures. It is then asked what are the features that determine which of implemented syntactic structures is the computational structure of the system, and it is contended that these features are certain aspects of mental content. The argument helps (section 3) to reassess the thesis known as computational externalism, namely, the thesis that computational theories of cognition make essential reference to features int he individual's environment. It is suggested that the familiar arguments for computational externalism--which rest on thought experiments and on exegesis of Marr's theories of vision--are unconvincing, but that they can be improved. A reconstruction of the visex/audex thought experiment is offered in section 3.1. An outline of a novel interpretation of Marr's theories of vision is presented in section 3.2. The corrected arguments support the claim that computational theories of cognition are intentional. Computational externalism is still pending, however, upon the thesis that psychological content is extrinsic.","Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, IL-91905 Jerusalem, Israel","Shagrir, O (reprint author), Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, IL-91905 Jerusalem, Israel.",,,,,,"Block N, 1990, MEANING METHOD ESSAY, P137; Bontly T, 1998, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V49, P557, DOI 10.1093/bjps/49.4.557 ; Boolos G., 1990, MEANING METHOD ESSAY; BURGE T, 1986, PHILOS REV, V95, P3, DOI 10.2307/2185131 ; Butler K, 1998, SYNTHESE, V114, P277, DOI 10.1023/A:1004996729912 ; Chalmers J. D., 1996, SYNTHESE, V108, P309; Churchland PS, 1992, COMPUTATIONAL BRAIN; Copeland BJ, 1996, SYNTHESE, V108, P335, DOI 10.1007/BF00413693 ; Cummins R., 1989, MEANING MENTAL REPRE; DAVIES M, 1991, MIND, V100, P461; EGAN F, 1995, PHILOS REV, V104, P181, DOI 10.2307/2185977 ; EGAN F, 1992, MIND, V101, P443, DOI 10.1093/mind/101.403.443 ; FODOR JA, 1980, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V3, P63, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X00001771 ; Fodor J.A., 1994, ELM EXPERT; Haugeland J., 1978, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V2, P215; HILDRETH EC, 1989, FDN COGNITIVE SCI, P581; KITCHER P, 1988, PHILOS SCI, V55, P1, DOI 10.1086/289413; Marr D., 1982, VISION; MORTON P, 1993, PHILOS SCI, V60, P86, DOI 10.1086/289719; Posner M. I., 1989, FDN COGNITIVE SCI; Putnam Hilary, 1988, REPRESENTATIONS REAL; SEARLE J. R., 1992, REDISCOVERY MIND; SEGAL G, 1989, PHILOS REV, V98, P189, DOI 10.2307/2185282 ; SEGAL G, 1991, MIND, V100, P485; Shagrir O, 1999, MONIST, V82, P131, DOI 10.5840/monist19998214 ; SHAPIRO L, 1996, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V61, P653; SHAPIRO LA, 1993, PHILOS REV, V102, P489, DOI 10.2307/2185681 ; Stich S., 1983, FOLK PSYCHOL COGNITI; WILSON AR, 1994, MIND, V103, P351","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/110.438.369",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","426XW","WOS:000168375600003",,,,,"2018-01-02",157.0,"bontlyt boolosg burget butlerk chalmersjd churchlandps copelandbj cumminsr daviesm eganf eganf fodorja fodorja haugelandj hildrethec kitcherp marrd mortonp posnermi putnamhilary searlejr segalg segalg shagriro shapirol shapirola stichs wilsonar blockn","cluster_0"
-1.4057885292080963,-0.7462591623590782,83.0,31.0,31.0,0.0,0.0,1993.0,102.0,408.0,554.0,586.0,33.0,"J","HORGAN, T",,,,"HORGAN, T",,,"FROM SUPERVENIENCE TO SUPERDUPERVENIENCE - MEETING THE DEMANDS OF A MATERIAL WORLD","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"PHYSICALISM; REDUCTION",,,"HORGAN, T (reprint author), MEMPHIS STATE UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,MEMPHIS,TN 38152, USA.",,,,,,"Alexander S., 1920, SPACE TIME DEITY; Bain A., 1870, LOGIC; BECKERMANN A, 1992, GRUNDL KOMM, P94; BICKLE J, 1992, BEHAV PHILOS, V20, P47; Blackburn S., 1971, MORALITY MORAL REASO, P101; Blackburn S, 1984, SPREADING WORD; Blackburn S., 1985, EXERCISES ANAL ESSAY, P47; BRINK DO, 1984, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V62, P111, DOI 10.1080/00048408412341311 ; Broad C.D, 1925, MIND ITS PLACE NATUR; Chalmers D.J., 1993, THESIS INDIANA U BLO; Churchland P., 1986, NEUROPHILOSOPHY; Davidson D., 1973, LOGIC METHODOLOGY PH, VIV, P709; DAVIDSON D, 1980, ESSAYS ACTIONS EVENT; Davidson D., 1970, EXPERIENCE THEORY, P79; Davidson D., 1985, ESSAYS DAVIDSON ACTI, P242; Dretske F., 1981, KNOWLEDGE FLOW INFOR; DRIER J, 1992, SO J PHILOS, V30, P13; ENDICOTT R, 1993, ERKENNTNIS, V38, P303; ENDICOTT RP, 1989, PAC PHILOS QUART, V70, P212; Fodor J., 1990, THEORY CONTENT OTHER; FODOR JA, 1991, J PHILOS, V88, P5, DOI 10.2307/2027084 ; FODOR JA, 1981, REPRESENTATIONS PHIL, P127; FODOR Jerry A., 1987, PSYCHOSEMANTICS PROB; Hare R. M., 1984, ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V58, P1; HARE R. M., 1952, LANGUAGE MORALS; HAUGELAND J, 1982, AM PHILOS QUART, V19, P93; HELLMAN G, 1977, NOUS, V11, P309, DOI 10.2307/2214560 ; HELLMAN GP, 1975, J PHILOS, V72, P551, DOI 10.2307/2025067 ; HORGAN T, 1987, PHILOS REV, V96, P491, DOI 10.2307/2185389 ; HORGAN T, 1981, SYNTHESE, V49, P395; HORGAN T, 1982, PAC PHILOS QUART, V63, P29; HORGAN T, 1984, SPINDEL C S CONCEPT, P19; HORGAN T, 1984, SO J PHILOS, P22; HORGAN T, IN PRESS PHILOS STUD; Horgan T., 1993, NATURALISM CRITICAL, P295; HORGAN T, 1993, IN PRESS PHILOS ISSU; HORGAN T, 1992, SYNTHESE, V92, P223; Horgan Terence, 1991, ERKENNTNIS, V34, P297; HORGAN T, 1989, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, P47; HORGAN TE, 1978, PHILOS SCI, V45, P227, DOI 10.1086/288798 ; Horwich P., 1990, TRUTH; KIM J, 1984, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V45, P153, DOI 10.2307/2107423 ; KIM J, 1984, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V9, P257, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4975.1984.tb00063.x ; KIM J, 1982, PHILOS STUD, V41, P51, DOI 10.1007/BF00353523 ; KIM J, 1978, AM PHILOS QUART, V15, P149; Kim Jaegwon, 1993, SUPERVENIENCE MIND; KIM J, 1992, PHILOS PHENOMENOL RE, V70, P1; Kim J., 1989, P ADDRESSES AM PHILO, V63, P31, DOI DOI 10.2307/3130081; KIM J, 1987, PHILOS PHENOMENOLOGI, V10, P315; KIM J, 1992, EMERGENCE REDUCTION, P119; Kim J., 1979, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V4, P31; Kim J., 1993, MENTAL CAUSATION, P189; KIM JI, 1984, SO J PHILOS S, P45; KIM JW, 1990, METAPHILOSOPHY, V21, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9973.1990.tb00830.x ; KLAGGE JC, 1988, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V66, P461, DOI 10.1080/00048408812343521 ; Kripke Saul Aaron, 1982, WITTGENSTEIN RULES P; LEVINE J, 1993, PACIFIC PHILOS Q, V64, P354; Lewes G. H., 1875, PROBLEMS LIFE MIND, V2; LEWIS D, 1979, NOUS, V13, P455, DOI 10.2307/2215339 ; LEWIS D, 1983, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V61, P343, DOI 10.1080/00048408312341131 ; Lewis D., 1986, PLURALITY WORLDS; LOVEJOY A, 1968, 6TH P INT C PHILOS H, P20; LYCAN WG, 1986, SOUTHERN J PHILOS, V24, P79, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-6962.1986.tb01598.x ; Mackie J., 1977, ETHICS INVENTING RIG; MARRAS A, 1993, PHILOS QUART, V43, P215, DOI 10.2307/2220371 ; MARRAS A, 1993, SYNTHESE, V95, P275, DOI 10.1007/BF01064591 ; MCLAUGHLIN B, 1989, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V3, P109; MCLAUGHLIN BP, 1992, GRUNDL KOMM, P49; MELNYK A, 1991, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V51, P573, DOI 10.2307/2107877 ; Mill J. S., 1872, SYSTEM LOGIC; Moore G. E., 1922, PHILOS STUD, P253; MOORE G. E, 1903, PRINCIPIA ETHICA; Morgan C. Lloyd, 1923, EMERGENT EVOLUTION; OWENS D, 1989, MIND, V98, P59; Quine Willard Van Orman, 1960, WORD OBJECT; Schiffer S., 1987, REMNANTS MEANING; STICH S, 1992, MIND, V101, P243, DOI 10.1093/mind/101.402.243 ; STICH S, IN PRESS MIDWEST STU; STICH SP, 1978, MONIST, V61, P573, DOI 10.5840/monist197861446 ; TELLER P, 1984, CONCEPT SUPERVENIENC, P137; TYE M, 1992, MIND, V101, P421, DOI 10.1093/mind/101.403.421 ; VANGULICK R, 1992, EMERGENCE REDUCTION, P157; WRIGHT C., 1992, TRUTH OBJECTIVITY","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","ME231","WOS:A1993ME23100001",,,,,"2018-01-02",158.0,"baina beckermanna bicklej blackburns blackburns blackburns brinkdo broadcd chalmersdj churchlandp davidsond davidsond davidsond davidsond dretskef drierj endicottr endicottrp fodorj fodorja fodorja fodorjerrya harerm harerm haugelandj hellmang hellmangp horgant horgant horgant horgant horgant horgant horgant horgant horgant horganterence horgant horgante horwichp kimj kimj kimj kimj kimjaegwon kimj kimj kimj kimj kimj kimj kimji kimjw klaggejc kripkesaulaaron levinej lewesgh lewisd lewisd lewisd lovejoya lycanwg mackiej marrasa marrasa mclaughlinb mclaughlinbp melnyka milljs moorege moorege morganclloyd owensd quinewillardvanorman schiffers stichs stichs stichsp tellerp tyem vangulickr wrightc alexanders","cluster_0"
-0.34942070183353197,-0.2767123598822843,2.0,31.0,31.0,0.0,0.0,1993.0,102.0,405.0,147.0,150.0,4.0,"J","BROCK, S",,,,"BROCK, S",,,"MODAL FICTIONALISM - A RESPONSE TO ROSEN","MIND",,,"English","Discussion",,,,,,,,,,"BROCK, S (reprint author), AUSTRALIAN NATL UNIV,RES SCH SOCIAL SCI,PROGRAM PHILOSOPHY,GPO BOX 4,CANBERRA,ACT 2601,AUSTRALIA.",,,,,,"Lewis D., 1986, PLURALITY WORLDS; ROSEN G, 1990, MIND, V99, P327","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/102.405.147",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","KK060","WOS:A1993KK06000008",,,,,"2018-01-02",159.0,"roseng lewisd","cluster_3"
-0.12940834756895914,-0.051393585161930044,29.0,31.0,31.0,0.0,1.0,1987.0,96.0,382.0,221.0,244.0,24.0,"J","BELL, D",,,,"BELL, D",,,"THE ART OF JUDGMENT","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"BELL, D (reprint author), UNIV SHEFFIELD,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,SHEFFIELD S10 2TN,S YORKSHIRE,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"ADICKES E, 1889, KRITIK REINEN VERNUN, pN633; BECK LW, 1969, EARLY GERMAN PHILOS, P498; BECK LW, 1975, KRITISCHE BEMERKUNGE, P369; BELL D, IN PRESS NOTRE DAME; BENNETT J, 1966, KANTS ANALYTIC, P151; Dummett M., 1978, TRUTH OTHER ENIGMAS, P116; Guyer Paul, 1979, KANT CLAIMS TASTE; JACOBI FH, 1812, WERKE, V3, P96; KANT, 1928, CRITIQUE JUDGEMENT, P51; KANT, 1965, 1ST INTRO CRITIQUE J; KANT I, 1956, CRITIQUE PRACTICAL R, P93; Kant I., 1902, KANTS GESAMMELTE SCH; Mothersill Mary, 1984, BEAUTY RESTORED; PERRY J, 1977, PHILOS REV, V86, P474, DOI 10.2307/2184564 ; PERRY J, 1979, NOUS, P3; PRIOR AN, 1971, OBJECTS THOUGHT, P4; RHEES R, 1974, PHILOS GRAMMAR, P157; SCHAPER E, 1979, STUDIES KANTS AESTHE, P18; SCHAPER E, 1964, REV METAPHYSICS, P270; SMITH K, 1923, COMMENTARY KANTS CRI, P579; WALKER RCS, 1982, KANT PURE REASON, P107; WALSH WH, 1967, ENCY PHILOS, V4, P319; Wilkerson T. E., 1976, KANTS CRITIQUE PURE, P95; WITTGENSTEIN L, 1969, NOTEBOOKS 1914-1916, P129; WITTGENSTEIN L, 1961, TRACTATUS LOGICO-PHI; Wittgenstein Ludwig, 1967, ZETTEL; WITTGENSTEIN L, 1972, LECTURES CONVERSATIO, P29; 1974, PHILOS INVESTIGATION, P217; 1933, I KANTS CRITIQUE PUR, P177","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","H2320","WOS:A1987H232000005",,,,,"2018-01-02",160.0,"becklw becklw belld bennettj dummettm guyerpaul jacobifh kant kant kanti kanti mothersillmary perryj perryj prioran rheesr schapere schapere smithk walkerrcs walshwh wilkersonte wittgensteinl wittgensteinl wittgensteinludwig wittgensteinl adickese","cluster_0"
0.05002140291274492,0.36912532967131323,25.0,30.0,30.0,0.0,2.0,2009.0,118.0,472.0,1043.0,1059.0,17.0,"J","Schwitzgebel, E; Rust, J",,,,"Schwitzgebel, Eric; Rust, Joshua",,,"The Moral Behaviour of Ethicists: Peer Opinion","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"SMOKING; HEALTH; DOCTORS","If philosophical moral reflection tends to improve moral behaviour, one might expect that professional ethicists will, on average, behave morally better than non-ethicists. One potential source of insight into the moral behaviour of ethicists is philosophers' opinions about ethicists' behaviour. At the 2007 Pacific Division meeting of the American Philosophical Association, we used chocolate to entice 277 passers-by to complete anonymous questionnaires without their knowing the topic of those questionnaires in advance. Version I of the questionnaire asked respondents to compare, in general, the moral behaviour of ethicists to that of philosophers not specializing in ethics and to non-academics of similar social background. Version II asked respondents similar questions about the moral behaviour of the ethics specialist in their department whose name comes next in alphabetical order after their own. Both versions asked control questions about specialists in metaphysics and epistemology. The majority of respondents expressed the view that ethicists do not, on average, behave better than non-ethicists. Whereas ethicists tended to avoid saying that ethicists behave worse than non-ethicists, non-ethicists expressed that pessimistic view about as often as they expressed the view that ethicists behave better.","[Schwitzgebel, Eric] Univ Calif Riverside, Dept Philosophy, Riverside, CA 92521 USA; [Rust, Joshua] Stetson Univ, Dept Philosophy, Unit 8250, Deland, FL 32723 USA","Schwitzgebel, E (reprint author), Univ Calif Riverside, Dept Philosophy, Riverside, CA 92521 USA.","eschwitz@ucr.edu; jrust@stetson.edu",,,,,"Aristotle, NICOMACHEAN ETHICS; Baier CJ, 2001, J RES CRIME DELINQ, V38, P3, DOI 10.1177/0022427801038001001 ; Christiansen C, 2008, REV FINANC, V12, P465, DOI 10.1093/rof/rfm026; Eshuys D, 2006, SEX ABUSE-J RES TR, V18, P279, DOI 10.1007/s11194-006-9020-5; GOSSELIN PG, 2005, LA TIMES 0329, pA1; HIRSCHI T, 1969, SOC PROBL, V17, P202, DOI 10.1525/sp.1969.17.2.03a00050 ; Jiang Y, 2007, AM J PREV MED, V33, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.02.037; Kant I., 1785, GROUNDWORK METAPHYSI; Kay MP, 2004, MED J AUSTRALIA, V181, P368; Lee DJ, 2007, J OCCUP ENVIRON MED, V49, P75, DOI 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31802ec68c; Mill John Stuart, 1859, LIBERTY; Moody-Adams M.M, 1997, FIELDWORK FAMILIAR P; Nussbaum M, 2007, U CHICAGO LAW REV, V74, P939; Nussbaum M. C., 1997, CULTIVATING HUMANITY; PLATO, COLLECTED DIALOGUES; Richards JG, 1999, NEW ZEAL MED J, V112, P96; SCHWITZGEBEL E, REV PHILOS IN PRESS; Schwitzgebel E, PHILOS PSYC IN PRESS; Sezer H, 2007, J HEALTH POPUL NUTR, V25, P107; Sinnott-Armstrong Walter, 2007, MORAL PSYCHOL, V3; SMITH DR, 2004, J OCCUPATIONAL ENV M, V49, P437; SQUIER C, 2006, EUROPEAN J CANC PREV, V15, P548; Warnock Mary, 2003, UTILITARIANISM LIBER; WILLIAMS B., 1981, MORAL LUCK; WILLIAMS B, ETHICS LIMITS PHILOS","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzp108",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","568WY","WOS:000275557900006",,,,,"2018-01-02",161.0,"baiercj christiansenc eshuysd gosselinpg hirschit jiangy kanti kaymp leedj milljohnstuart moodyadamsmm nussbaumm nussbaummc plato richardsjg schwitzgebele schwitzgebele sezerh sinnottarmstrongwalter smithdr squierc warnockmary williamsb williamsb aristotle","cluster_6"
-0.5715938086109376,-0.5287307712353796,49.0,30.0,30.0,0.0,1.0,2003.0,112.0,446.0,235.0,281.0,47.0,"J","Greenough, P",,,,"Greenough, P",,,"Vagueness: A minimal theory","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"HIGHER-ORDER VAGUENESS","Vagueness is given a philosophically neutral definition in terms of an epistemic notion of tolerance. Such a notion is intended to capture the thesis that vague terms draw no known boundary across their range of signification and contrasts sharply with the semantic notion of tolerance given by Wright (1975,1976). This allows us to distinguish vagueness from superficially similar but distinct phenomena such as semantic incompleteness. Two proofs are given which show that vagueness que epistemic tolerance and vagueness qua borderline cases (when properly construed to exclude terms which are stipulated to give rise to borderline cases) are inf act conceptually equivalent dimensions of vagueness, contrary to what might initially be expected. It is also argued that the common confusion of tolerance and epistemic tolerance has skewed the vagueness debate in favour of indeterminist over epistemic conceptions of vagueness. Clearing up that confusion provides an indirect argument in favour of epistemicism. Finally, given the equation of vagueness with epistemic tolerance, it is shown that there must be radical higher-order vagueness, contrary to what many authors have argued.","Univ St Andrews, Dept Logic & Metaphysics, St Andrews KY16 9AJ, Fife, Scotland","Greenough, P (reprint author), Univ St Andrews, Dept Logic & Metaphysics, St Andrews KY16 9AJ, Fife, Scotland.",,,,,,"Alston W. P., 1967, ENCYCL PHILOS, V8, P218; Black M, 1937, PHILOS SCI, P427, DOI [10.1086/286476, DOI 10.1086/286476]; Burgess JA, 1998, MONIST, V81, P233, DOI 10.5840/monist199881215 ; BURGESS JA, 1990, SYNTHESE, V85, P417, DOI 10.1007/BF00484836 ; CHANNELL I, 1994, VAGUE LANGUAGE; CHEALLS B, 1980, MODAL LOGIC INTRO; Dummett Michael, 1978, TRUTH OTHER ENIGMAS; Dummett Michael, 1991, LOGICAL BASIS METAPH; Dummett M., 1975, SYNTHESE, V30, P301; Dummett Michael, 1973, FREGE PHILOS LANGUAG; FIELD H, 1994, PHILOS REV, V103, P405, DOI 10.2307/2185788 ; FIELD H, 2001, TRUTH ABSENCE FACT; Fine Kit, 1975, SYNTHESE, V30, P265, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00485047; Frege Gottlob, 1979, POSTHUMOUS WRITINGS; Horwich P, 1997, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V57, P929, DOI 10.2307/2953811 ; Hyde D, 1997, MIND, V106, P641, DOI 10.1093/mind/106.424.641 ; HYDE D, 1994, MIND, V103, P35, DOI 10.1093/mind/103.409.35 ; Kamp Hans, 1981, ASPECTS PHILOS LOGIC; Keefe Rosann, 1996, VAGUENESS READER; Keefe Rosanna, 2000, THEORIES VAGUENESS; KOONS R, 1949, MIND, V103, P439; McGee V., 1991, TRUTH VAGUENESS PARA; MCGEE V, SO J PHILOS, V33, P203; Peirce C.S., 1902, DICT PHILOS PSYCHOL, P748; Putnam Hilary, 1983, ERKENNTNIS, V19, P297; Russell B., 1923, AUST J PHILOS, V1, P84; Sainsbury M., 1995, SO J PHILOS, V33, P63; Sainsbury Mark, 1991, PHILOS Q, V41, P67; SAINSBURY M, 1990, CONCEPTS WITHOUT BOU; Sainsbury Mark, 1989, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V89, P33; SORENSEN RA, 1985, ANALYSIS, V45, P134, DOI 10.2307/3327138 ; Sorensen R. A., 1988, BLINDSPOTS; TYE M, 1995, SO J PHILOS, P1; UNGER P, 1979, SYNTHESE, V41, P117, DOI 10.1007/BF00869568 ; WHEELER SC, 1979, SYNTHESE, V41, P155, DOI 10.1007/BF00869569 ; WILLIAMSON T, 1995, SOUTHERN J PHILOS, V33, P171, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-6962.1995.tb00769.x ; Williamson T, 1999, MIND, V108, P127, DOI 10.1093/mind/108.429.127 ; Williamson T., 2000, KNOWLEDGE ITS LIMITS; WILLIAMSON T, 1997, TRUTH PHILOS ISSUES, V8; Williamson T., 1992, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V66, P145; WILLIAMSON T, 1996, ANALYSIS, P39; Williamson T., 1994, VAGUENESS; WRIGHT C, 1995, SOUTHERN J PHILOS, V33, P133, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-6962.1995.tb00767.x ; Wright C, 2001, MIND, V110, P45, DOI 10.1093/mind/110.437.45 ; WRIGHT C, 1929, TRUTH OBJECTIVITY; Wright C., 1987, PHILOS TOPICS, V15, P227; WRIGHT C, 1992, ANALYSIS, V52, P192; Wright C., 1976, TRUTH MEANING ESSAYS, P223; Wright Crispin, 1975, SYNTHESE, V30, P325, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00485049","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/112.446.235",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","669NH","WOS:000182357000002",,,,,"2018-01-02",162.0,"blackm burgessja burgessja channelli cheallsb dummettmichael dummettmichael dummettm dummettmichael fieldh fieldh finekit fregegottlob horwichp hyded hyded kamphans keeferosann keeferosanna koonsr mcgeev mcgeev peircecs putnamhilary russellb sainsburym sainsburymark sainsburym sainsburymark sorensenra sorensenra tyem ungerp wheelersc williamsont williamsont williamsont williamsont williamsont williamsont williamsont wrightc wrightc wrightc wrightc wrightc wrightc wrightcrispin alstonwp","cluster_0"
-0.6089478343303844,-0.5711566170791369,20.0,30.0,30.0,0.0,0.0,1995.0,104.0,413.0,79.0,106.0,28.0,"J","HECK, RG",,,,"HECK, RG",,,"THE SENSE OF COMMUNICATION","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"HECK, RG (reprint author), HARVARD UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,208 EMERSON HALL,CAMBRIDGE,MA 02174, USA.",,,"Heck, Richard/0000-0002-2961-2663",,,"Carruthers P., 1989, TRACTARIAN SEMANTICS; Dummett M., 1978, TRUTH OTHER ENIGMAS, P116; Dummett M., 1981, FREGE PHILOS LANGUAG; Evans G., 1982, VARIETIES REFERENCE; Evans G., 1985, COLLECTED PAPERS; FORBES G, 1990, PHILOS REV, V99, P535, DOI 10.2307/2185616 ; Frege G, 1984, COLLECTED PAPERS; Frege Gottlob, 1918, BEITRAGE PHILOS DTSC, VI, P58; Frege G., 1892, Z PHILOS PHILOS KRIT, V100, P25; GEORGE A, IN PRESS LOGIC LANGU; Kaplan D., 1978, PRAGMATICS, P221; KRIPKE S, 1976, MEANING USE, P239; KRIPKE S., 1980, NAMING NECESSITY; Loar B., 1988, CONTENTS THOUGHT, P99; Peacocke C., 1992, STUDY CONCEPTS; Putnam H, 1975, MIND LANGUAGE REALIT, V2, P215; RICHARD M, 1983, J PHILOS LOGIC, V12, P425, DOI 10.1007/BF00249259 ; Salmon N., 1986, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, V27, P401, DOI 10.1305/ndjfl/1093636683; Salmon N, 1986, FREGES PUZZLE; WIGGINS D, 1976, STUDIEN FREGE, V2, P221","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/104.413.79",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","QH555","WOS:A1995QH55500003",,,,,"2018-01-02",163.0,"dummettm dummettm evansg evansg forbesg fregeg fregegottlob fregeg georgea kapland kripkes kripkes loarb peacockec putnamh richardm salmonn salmonn wigginsd carruthersp","cluster_0"
-0.5270391882046964,-0.44780095941230996,8.0,30.0,30.0,0.0,0.0,1991.0,100.0,398.0,189.0,200.0,12.0,"J","ARMSTRONG, DM",,,,"ARMSTRONG, DM",,,"CLASSES ARE STATES OF AFFAIRS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"ARMSTRONG, DM (reprint author), UNIV SYDNEY,SYDNEY,NSW 2006,AUSTRALIA.",,,,,,"Armstrong D., 1980, TIME CAUSE ESSAYS PR; Armstrong D. M., 1978, UNIVERSALS SCI REALI, VII; Armstrong D. M., 1989, COMBINATORIAL THEORY; FORREST P, 1987, PHILOS PAPERS, P165; Grossman R., 1983, CATEGORICAL STRUCTUR; LEWIS D, 1986, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, P92; Lewis D., 1986, PLURALITY WORLDS; Lewis D.K., 1991, PARTS CLASSES","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","FK600","WOS:A1991FK60000001",,,,,"2018-01-02",164.0,"armstrongdm armstrongdm forrestp grossmanr lewisd lewisd lewisdk armstrongd","cluster_3"
-0.14153251033228428,-0.08311787478271855,13.0,30.0,30.0,0.0,0.0,1990.0,99.0,394.0,221.0,238.0,18.0,"J","PRICE, H",,,,"PRICE, H",,,"WHY NOT","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"PRICE, H (reprint author), UNIV SYDNEY,DEPT TRADIT & MODERN PHILOSOPHY,SYDNEY,NSW 2006,AUSTRALIA.",,,,,,"ADAM E, 1965, INQUIRY, P166; BENDALL K, 1979, NOTRE DAME J FORM L, P68; BENNETT J, 1976, LINGUISTIC BEHAVIOR; DENNETT D, 1983, BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN SC, P343; DUMMETT M, 1973, FREGE PHILOS LANGUAG, P316; FODOR, 1985, MIND, V95, P88; GEACH, 1960, TRANSLATIONS PHILOS, P117; HOLLIS, 1985, ANALYSIS, P177; PRICE H, 1983, MIND, P174; PRICE H, 1987, MIND, P202; PRICE H, 1988, FACTS FUNCTION TRUTH, pCH2; QUINE, 1974, METHODS LOGIC, P9; Tennant Neil, 1987, ANTIREALISM LOGIC","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","DA146","WOS:A1990DA14600004",,,,,"2018-01-02",165.0,"bendallk bennettj dennettd dummettm fodor geach hollis priceh priceh priceh quine tennantneil adame","cluster_0"
-0.649903739567507,-0.3268248417313172,28.0,30.0,30.0,0.0,0.0,1986.0,95.0,377.0,1.0,17.0,17.0,"J","TYE, M",,,,"TYE, M",,,"THE SUBJECTIVE QUALITIES OF EXPERIENCE","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"TYE, M (reprint author), NO ILLINOIS UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,DE KALB,IL 60115, USA.",,,,,,"BLOCK N, 1980, PHILOS REV, V89, P257, DOI 10.2307/2184650 ; Block N., 1978, MINNESOTA STUDIES PH, VIX, P261; Campbell K. K., 1970, BODY MIND; Dretske F., 1981, KNOWLEDGE FLOW INFOR; HARRISON B, 1973, FORM CONTENT; Horgan T., 1984, PHILOS Q, P147; JACKSON F, 1982, PHILOS QUART, V32, P127, DOI 10.2307/2960077 ; KIM J, 1972, MONIST, P177; KIRK R, 1974, MIND, P43; KRIPKE SA, 1972, SEMANTICS NATURAL LA, P335; LYCAN WG, 1981, J PHILOS, V78, P24, DOI 10.2307/2025395 ; MARSH R. C, 1956, LOGIC KNOWLEDGE; McGinn C., 1982, CHARACTER MIND; MCGINN C, 1980, SYNTHESE, P182; MCGINN C, 1977, ANALYSIS, P78; MEEHL P, 1966, MIND MATTER METHOD E, P151; NAGEL T, 1974, PHILOS REV, V83, P435, DOI 10.2307/2183914 ; PUTNAM H, 1973, J PHILOS, P699; RUSSELL B, PHILOS LOGICAL ATOMI; Seddon G., 1972, MIND, P481; SHOEMAKER S, 1981, PHILOS REV, V90, P581, DOI 10.2307/2184608 ; SHOEMAKER S, 1982, J PHILOS, P357; SHOEMAKER S, 1975, PHILOS STUD, V27, P291; THORNTON MT, 1972, MONIST, P193; TYE M, UNPUB PHILOS D DAVID; TYE M, 1984, AM PHILOS Q, P319; TYE M, 1984, PHILOS REV, P195; TYE M, 1984, J PHILOS, P678","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","A5561","WOS:A1986A556100001",,,,,"2018-01-02",166.0,"blockn campbellkk dretskef harrisonb horgant jacksonf kimj kirkr kripkesa lycanwg marshrc mcginnc mcginnc mcginnc meehlp nagelt putnamh russellb seddong shoemakers shoemakers shoemakers thorntonmt tyem tyem tyem tyem blockn","cluster_0"
-0.1777648971852452,-0.1318714833568299,9.0,30.0,30.0,0.0,0.0,1974.0,83.0,332.0,534.0,551.0,18.0,"J","DESOUSA, RB",,,,"DESOUSA, RB",,,"GOOD AND TRUE","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"UNIV TORONTO,TORONTO,ONTARIO,CANADA",,,,,,,"DAVIDSON D., 1957, DECISION MAKING EXPT; Davidson D., 1970, MORAL CONCEPTS; HARMAN GH, 1967, J PHILOS, V64, P792, DOI 10.2307/2024086 ; Jeffrey R., 1971, J PHILOS, V68, P647; JEFFREY RC, 1965, LOGIC DECISION, P197; KENNY A, 1970, MORAL CONCEPTS, P45; WALLACE J, 1969, J PHILOS, V66, P145, DOI 10.2307/2024329 ; WILLIAMS BAO, 1966, ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V40; 1971, REV METAPHYSICS, V25, P52","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","U4266","WOS:A1974U426600004",,,,,"2018-01-02",167.0,"davidsond harmangh jeffreyr jeffreyrc kennya wallacej williamsbao davidsond","cluster_0"
-0.3386601381248143,-0.3124385428404447,26.0,29.0,29.0,0.0,0.0,1998.0,107.0,427.0,529.0,563.0,35.0,"J","Garcia-Carpintero, M",,,,"Garcia-Carpintero, M",,,"Indexicals as token-reflexives","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"DEMONSTRATIVES",,"Univ Barcelona, Dept Logica Hist & Filosofia Ciencia, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain","Garcia-Carpintero, M (reprint author), Univ Barcelona, Dept Logica Hist & Filosofia Ciencia, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain.",,"garcia-carpintero, manuel/F-4949-2011","garcia-carpintero, manuel/0000-0001-7674-4944",,,"Almog J., 1989, THEMES KAPLAN; BACH K, 1992, PHILOS STUD, V67, P295, DOI 10.1007/BF00354541 ; BRAUN D, 1996, NOUS, V30, P145, DOI 10.2307/2216291 ; BURKS A. W., 1949, PHILOS PHENOMENOLOGI, VIX, P673, DOI DOI 10.2307/2103298; CRIMMINS M, 1995, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V9; Garcia-Carpintero M., 1996, ERKENNTNIS, V44, P305; Garcia- Carpintero Manuel, 1998, TEOREMA, V18. 1, P21; GARCIACARPINTER.M, PALABRAS IDEAS COSAS; Garcia-Carpintero M, 1993, NOTRE DAME J FORM L, V34, P107; GarciaCarpintero M, 1996, CRITICA, V28, P3; Kaplan David, 1989, THEMES KAPLAN, P481; Kaplan David, 1989, THEMES KAPLAN, V1989, P565; MILLIKAN RG, WHITE QUEEN PSYCHOL; NEALE S, DESCRIPTIONS; PEREZ M, IN PRESS EUROPEAN RE; PERRY John, 1997, COMPANION PHILOS LAN, P586; PERRY J, PROBLEM ESSENTIAL IN; REICHENBACH H, ELEMENTS SYMBOLIC LO; REIMER M, 1991, PHILOS STUD, V63, P187, DOI 10.1007/BF00381687 ; RICHARD M, 1993, LINGUIST PHILOS, V16, P123, DOI 10.1007/BF00985177 ; SEARLE JR, INTENTIONALITY; Stalnaker R., 1978, SYNTAX SEMANTICS, V9, P315, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470758335.CH5; TOMBERLIN J, 1995, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES; WETTSTEIN H, HAS SEMANTICS RESTED; WETTSTEIN HK, 1984, SYNTHESE, V58, P63, DOI 10.1007/BF00485362 ; Wright C., 1997, COMPANION PHILOS LAN","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/107.427.529",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","103KH","WOS:000074999900002",,,,,"2018-01-02",168.0,"bachk braund burksaw crimminsm garciacarpinterom garciacarpinteromanuel garciacarpinterm garciacarpinterom garciacarpinterom kaplandavid kaplandavid millikanrg neales perezm perryjohn perryj reichenbachh reimerm richardm searlejr stalnakerr tomberlinj wettsteinh wettsteinhk wrightc almogj","cluster_0"
-0.6487823881864043,-0.5389013333329012,31.0,29.0,29.0,0.0,0.0,1997.0,106.0,424.0,717.0,741.0,25.0,"J","Williamson, T",,,,"Williamson, T",,,"Knowledge as evidence","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"Williamson, T (reprint author), UNIV EDINBURGH,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,EDINBURGH EH8 9YL,MIDLOTHIAN,SCOTLAND.",,,,,,"Achinstein Peter, 1983, CONCEPT EVIDENCE; AUSTIN JL, SENSE SENSIBILIA; CARNAP R, LOGICAL F PROBABILIT; CHRISTENSEN D, 1992, PHILOS SCI, V59, P540, DOI 10.1086/289694 ; CRAIG E, 1990, P BRIT ACAD, V76, P265; Davidson D., 1986, TRUTH INTERPRETATION, P307; Earman John, 1993, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V18, P19; EARMAN J, BAYES BUST; GETTIER E. L., 1963, ANALYSIS, V23, P121, DOI DOI 10.1093/ANALYS/23.6.121; GLYMOUR C, THEORY EVIDENCE; Grice P., STUDIES WAY WORDS; HEMPEL CG, ASPECTS SCI EXPLANAT; HOWSON C, SCI REASONING BAYESI; JEFFREY RC, LOGIC DECISION; KAPLAN M, 1985, J PHILOS, V82, P350, DOI 10.2307/2026524 ; Lepore Ernest, 1986, TRUTH INTERPRETATION; Lipton P., INFERENCE BEST EXPLA; Maher P, 1996, PHILOS SCI, V63, P149, DOI 10.1086/289906 ; MCDOWELL J, MIND WORLD; MILLAR A, REASONS EXPERIENCE; MOSER P, KNOWLEDGE EVIDENCE; PEACOCKE C, STUDY CONCEPTS; Peirce C. S., 1932, COLLECTED PAPERS, VII; Quine W. V. O., 1969, ONTOLOGICAL RELATIVI, P39; STAMPE DW, 1987, PHILOS REV, V96, P335, DOI 10.2307/2185225 ; UNGER P, IGNORANCE CASE SKEPT; WILLIAMSON T, 1996, J PHILOS, V93, P554, DOI 10.2307/2941049 ; WILLIAMSON T, 1995, MIND, V104, P533, DOI 10.1093/mind/104.415.533 ; WILLIAMSON T, UNPUB CONDITIONALIZI; WILLIAMSON T, VAGUENESS; WRIGHT C, 1991, MIND, V100, P87","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/106.424.717",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","YB287","WOS:A1997YB28700005",,,,,"2018-01-02",169.0,"austinjl carnapr christensend craige davidsond earmanjohn earmanj gettierel glymourc gricep hempelcg howsonc jeffreyrc kaplanm leporeernest liptonp maherp mcdowellj millara moserp peacockec peircecs quinewvo stampedw ungerp williamsont williamsont williamsont williamsont wrightc achinsteinpeter","cluster_0"
-0.5257788415750746,-0.45892290444532985,11.0,29.0,29.0,0.0,0.0,1990.0,99.0,393.0,23.0,31.0,9.0,"J","LEWIS, D",,,,"LEWIS, D",,,"NONEISM OR ALLISM","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"LEWIS, D (reprint author), PRINCETON UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,PRINCETON,NJ 08544, USA.",,,,,,"ARMSTRONG DM, 1978, UNIVERSALS SCI REALI, V1, P32; BLACK M, 1971, REV METAPHYS, P614; BOOLOS G, 1985, PHILOS REV JUL, P327; BOOLOS G, 1984, J PHILOS, P430; KAUFMAN GD, 1985, THEOLOGY NUCLEAR AGE; Lewis D., 1983, PHILOS PAPERS, V1; LYCAN W, 1979, POSSIBLE ACTUAL, P290; PARSONS, 1974, J PHILOS, P561; PLANTINGA A, 1987, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, P189; Routley R., 1980, EXPLORING MEINONGS J; WILLIAMS DC, 1962, J PHILOS, P748","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","CL170","WOS:A1990CL17000002",,,,,"2018-01-02",170.0,"blackm boolosg boolosg kaufmangd lewisd lycanw parsons plantingaa routleyr williamsdc armstrongdm","cluster_3"
-0.03871014156810516,-0.04959710306224387,4.0,29.0,29.0,0.0,1.0,1985.0,94.0,375.0,331.0,344.0,14.0,"J","BOOLOS, G",,,,"BOOLOS, G",,,"READING THE BEGRIFFSSCHRIFT","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"BOOLOS, G (reprint author), MIT,DEPT LINGUIST & PHILOSOPHY,CAMBRIDGE,MA 02139, USA.",,,,,,"BOOLOS G, 1984, J PHILOS, P430; BOOLOS G, 1985, PHILOS REV; FREGE G, BEGRIFFSSCHRIFT; RUSSINOFF IS, 1983, THESIS MIT","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","AMU99","WOS:A1985AMU9900001",,,,,"2018-01-02",171.0,"boolosg fregeg russinoffis boolosg","cluster_0"
-0.026217553273843307,0.019457471877153475,9.0,28.0,28.0,0.0,0.0,1999.0,108.0,430.0,241.0,264.0,24.0,"J","Hawthorne, J; Bovens, L",,,,"Hawthorne, J; Bovens, L",,,"The preface, the lottery, and the logic of belief (Doxastic notions, confidence)","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"Univ Oklahoma, Dept Philosophy, Norman, OK 73019 USA; Univ Colorado, Dept Philosophy, Boulder, CO 80309 USA","Hawthorne, J (reprint author), Univ Oklahoma, Dept Philosophy, Norman, OK 73019 USA.",,,,,,"FOLEY R, 1992, AM PHILOS QUART, V29, P111; FOLEY R, 1993, WORKING WITHOUT NET; HAWTHORNE J, 1996, J PHILOS LOGIC, V25, P185; KRANTZ DH, 1972, FDN MEASUREMENT; Kyburg H., 1970, INDUCTION ACCEPTANCE; Kyburg H. E., 1961, PROBABILITY LOGIC RA; Locke John, ESSAY HUMAN UNDERSTA; Makinson David C., 1965, ANALYSIS, V25, P205, DOI DOI 10.1093/ANALYS/25.6.205; SAVAGE LJ, 1972, FDN STAT INFERENCE","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/108.430.241",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","190AT","WOS:000079939900002",,,,,"2018-01-02",173.0,"foleyr hawthornej krantzdh kyburgh kyburghe lockejohn makinsondavidc savagelj foleyr","cluster_3"
-1.8566692800535523,-1.792725740427103,148.0,28.0,29.0,0.0,4.0,1995.0,104.0,416.0,761.0,825.0,65.0,"J","NEALE, S",,,,"NEALE, S",,,"THE PHILOSOPHICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF GODEL SLINGSHOT","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"EVENTS",,,"NEALE, S (reprint author), UNIV CALIF BERKELEY,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,BERKELEY,CA 94720, USA.",,,,,,"ACHINSTEIN P, 1975, CAN J PHILOS, V5, P1; ACHINSTEIN P, 1979, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V4, P369; ALTMAN A, 1979, PHILOS STUD, V36, P301, DOI 10.1007/BF00372634 ; ANDERSON AR, 1962, PHILOS STUD, V13, P9, DOI 10.1007/BF00818100 ; ANSCOMBE GEM, 1969, J PHILOS, V66, P152, DOI 10.2307/2024330 ; Armstrong D. M., 1993, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V7, P429; BARWISE J, 1981, LINGUIST PHILOS, V4, P159, DOI 10.1007/BF00350139 ; Barwise J., 1989, LIAR ESSAY TRUTH CIR; Barwise J., 1981, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V6, P387; Barwise J., 1983, SITUATIONS ATTITUDES; Bennett J.F, 1988, EVENTS THEIR NAMES; Burge Tyler, 1974, NOUS, V8, P309; Burge Tyler, 1986, FREGE SYNTHESIZED, P97; Burks A., 1951, MIND, V60, P363; Carnap R., 1947, MEANING NECESSITY; Carnap Rudolf, 1942, INTRO SEMANTICS; Chisholm R.M., 1965, BOSTON STUDIES PHILO, Vii, P275; Church A., 1943, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V8, P45; Church A., 1943, PHILOS REV, V52, P298; Church A., 1956, INTRO MATH LOGIC; Church A., 1940, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V5, P56; CLARK R, 1975, FACT VALUE PERCEPTIO; CUMMINS R, 1972, AM PHILOS QUART, V9, P265; DALE AJ, 1978, ANALYSIS, V38, P99, DOI 10.2307/3327504 ; DAVIDSON D, 1967, J PHILOS, V64, P691, DOI 10.2307/2023853 ; DAVIDSON D, 1990, J PHILOS, V87, P279, DOI 10.2307/2026863 ; DAVIDSON D, 1969, J PHILOS, V66, P748, DOI 10.2307/2023778 ; DAVIDSON D, 1967, SYNTHESE, V7, P304; DAVIDSON D, 1969, FACT EXISTENCE, P74; Davidson D., 1967, LOGIC DECISION ACTIO, P81, DOI DOI 10.1093/0199246270.003.0006; Davidson Donald, 1989, RELATIVISM INTERPRET, P159; DAVIDSON D., 1984, INQUIRIES TRUTH INTE; DAVIDSON D, 1980, ESSAYS ACTIONS EVENT; DAVIDSON D, IN PRESS FOLLY TRYIN; DAVIES M, 1978, J PHILOS LOGIC, V7, P15; Davies M., 1981, MEANING QUANTIFICATI; DONNELLAN K, 1981, RADICAL PRAGMATICS, P129; EVANS G, 1977, CAN J PHILOS, V7, P467; Gareth Evans, 1985, COLLECT PAPERS, P343; Evans Gareth, 1984, VARIETIES REFERENCE; Evnine S, 1991, D DAVIDSON; FINE K, 1982, SYNTHESE, V53, P43; Follesdal Dagfinn, 1965, BOSTON STUDIES PHILO, VII, P263; Follesdal D., 1983, ERKENNTNIS, V19, P91; Follesdal D., 1969, WORDS OBJECTIONS, P175; FOLLESDAL D, 1966, FILOSOFISKE PROBLEME, V23; FOLLESDAL D, 1964, THEORIA, V33, P1; Frege G., 1892, Z PHILOS PHILOS KRIT, V100, P25; Frege Gottlob, 1964, BASIC LAWS ARITHMETI; GALE R, 1970, PHILOS Q, V20, P162; Geach P., 1972, LOGIC MATTERS; Godel K., 1944, PHILOS B RUSSELL, P125; GOTTLIEB DV, 1974, PHILOS STUD, V25, P69, DOI 10.1007/BF00364718 ; GRANDY RE, 1972, J PHILOS LOGIC, V1, P137, DOI 10.1007/BF00650493 ; Hallden Soren, 1949, LOGIC NONSENSE; Harre R., 1975, CAUSAL POWERS; Hilbert D., 1934, GRUNDLAGEN MATH, VI; Hochberg H, 1978, THOUGHT FACT REFEREN; HOCHBERG H, 1984, LOGIC ONTOLOGY TRUTH, P279; HORGAN T, 1978, PHILOS REV, V87, P28, DOI 10.2307/2184346 ; HORGAN T, 1982, PHILOS STUD, V42, P47, DOI 10.1007/BF00372839 ; KALISH D, 1980, LOGIC TECHNIQUES FOR; Kaplan David, 1978, SYNTAX SEMANTICS, V9, P221; Kim Jaegwon, 1993, SUPERVENIENCE MIND; Korner S., 1960, PHILOS MATH; Kripke S., 1972, SEMANTICS NATURAL LA, P253, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_9; Lambert K., 1991, PHILOS APPL FREE LOG, P17; LEVIN ME, 1976, PHILOS SCI, V43, P266, DOI 10.1086/288680 ; Lewis C. I., 1943, PHILOS PHENOMENOLOGI, VIv, P236, DOI DOI 10.2307/2103080; LINDSTROM P, 1966, THEORIA, V32, P186; LINDSTROM S, 1991, NOUS, V25, P743, DOI 10.2307/2215650 ; LOMBARD B, 1979, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V4, P409; Lycan W., 1984, LOGICAL FORM NATURAL; LYCAN WG, 1974, MIND, V83, P498; MACKIE JL, 1965, AM PHILOS QUART, V2, P245; Mackie John L., 1974, CEMENT UNIVERSE; MARCUS R, 1948, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V13; MARTI G, 1994, J PHILOS LOGIC, V23, P573; MATES B, 1973, FOUND LANG, V10, P409; MCGINN C, 1976, MIND, V85, P422; Mellor D. H., 1991, MATTERS METAPHYSICS; Mellor D. H., 1995, FACTS CAUSATION; MORTON A, 1969, J PHILOS, V66, P159, DOI 10.2307/2024331 ; Mostowski A., 1957, FUND MATH, V44, P12; NEALE S, 1993, RUSSELL ANAL PHILOS, P97; Neale S., 1990, DESCRIPTIONS; Neale S., 1993, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V7, P89; NEEDHAM P, 1994, LOGIC CAUSAL REASONI, P67; OLSON K, 1987, LECTURE NOTES CSLI P, V6; PAP A, 1958, MINN STUD PHILOS SCI, V2, P196; PARSONS C, 1990, K GODEL COLLECTED WO, V2, P102; POLLOCK J, 1984, F PHILOS SEMANTICS; Prior A. N., 1967, ENCY PHILOS; QUINE WV, 1953, LOGICAL POINT VIEW, P80; Quine W. V. O., 1947, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V12, P43; Quine W., 1980, LOGICAL POINT VIEW, P1; Quine Willard Van Orman, 1960, WORD OBJECT; Quine W. V., 1943, J PHILOS, V40, P113; QUINE WV, 1953, 11TH P INT C PHIL BR, V14, P65; QUINE WV, 1951, MATHEMATICAL LOGIC; Quine W. V., 1982, METHODS LOGIC; MCGEE VANN, 1997, PHILOS AN WHITEHEAD, V106, P35; RORTY R, 1992, OBJECTIVITY RELATIVI; Rorty R., 1992, LINGUISTIC TURN; ROSENBERG A, 1979, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V4, P401; Russell Bertrand, 1956, LOGIC KNOWLEDGE; Russel B, 1905, MIND, V14, P479, DOI DOI 10.1093/MIND/XIV.4.479; SAINSBURY M, 1990, LOGICAL FORMS INTRO; SAINTPULGENT M, 1993, MONUMENT HIST, P3; SCOTT D, 1967, B RUSSELL PHILOS CEN, P181; Searle John R., 1995, CONSTRUCTION SOCIAL; Searle JR, 1969, SPEECH ACTS; SHARVY R, 1972, PHILOS SCI, V39, P153, DOI 10.1086/288430 ; SHARVY R, 1970, PHILOS STUD, V21, P5, DOI 10.1007/BF00375974 ; SHARVY R, 1983, PHILOSOPHIA, V3, P453; SKYRMS B, 1981, PHILOS STUD, V40, P199, DOI 10.1007/BF00353791 ; SLEIGH RC, 1966, PHILOS STUD, V17, P91, DOI 10.1007/BF01324510 ; Smullyan A. F., 1947, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V12, P139; SMULLYAN AF, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V13, P31; STERN C, 1978, PHILOS SCI, V45, P614, DOI 10.1086/288839 ; Strawson P. F., 1950, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V24, P129; STRAWSON PF, 1986, WO STEHT ANAL PHILOS, P75; Strawson PF, 1950, MIND, V59, P320; Strawson P., 1964, THEORIA-SPAIN, V30, P96, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1755-2567.1964.TB00404.X; STRAWSON PF, 1972, SUBJECT PREDICATE LO; Strawson P., 1954, PHILOS REV, V63, P216; Tarski A., 1956, LOGIC SEMANTICS META; Taylor B., 1985, MODES OCCURRENCE VER; TAYLOR B, 1976, TRUTH MEANING, P263; Thomason R. H., 1969, LOGICAL WAY DOING TH, P119; TRENHOLME R, 1975, J PHILOS, V72, P444, DOI 10.2307/2025014 ; van Benthem J, 1986, ESSAYS LOGICAL SEMAN; Van Fraassen B., 1969, J PHILOS, V67, P477; VENDLER Z, 1967, J PHILOS, V64, P704, DOI 10.2307/2023854 ; Vendler Zeno, 1967, LINGUISTICS PHILOS; Wagner S. J., 1986, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, V27, P430, DOI 10.1305/ndjfl/1093636684; WALLACE J, 1969, J PHILOS, V66, P145, DOI 10.2307/2024329 ; Wedberg Anders, 1984, HIST PHILOS, VIII; WEDBERG A, 1966, FILOSOFINS HIST BOLZ; Westerstahl D., 1989, HDB PHILOS LOGIC, VIV, P1; Russell B., 1927, PRINCIPIA MATHEMATIC, V1; WIDERKER D, 1983, NOUS, V17, P457, DOI 10.2307/2215260 ; WIDERKER D, 1985, ERKENNTNIS, V23, P223; WILLIAMSON J, 1976, PHILOS QUART, V26, P203, DOI 10.2307/2219013 ; Wilson Neil, 1959, CONCEPT LANGUAGE; WILSON NL, 1974, PHILOS STUD, V25, P303, DOI 10.1007/BF00355495 ; WILSON NL, 1959, REV METAPHYS, V12, P521; WITTGENSTEIN L, 1961, TRACTATUS LOGICO-PHI","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/104.416.761",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","TB435","WOS:A1995TB43500006",,,,,"2018-01-02",174.0,"achinsteinp altmana andersonar anscombegem armstrongdm barwisej barwisej barwisej barwisej bennettjf burgetyler burgetyler burksa carnapr carnaprudolf chisholmrm churcha churcha churcha churcha clarkr cumminsr daleaj davidsond davidsond davidsond davidsond davidsond davidsond davidsondonald davidsond davidsond davidsond daviesm daviesm donnellank evansg garethevans evansgareth evnines finek follesdaldagfinn follesdald follesdald follesdald follesdald fregeg fregegottlob galer geachp godelk gottliebdv grandyre halldensoren harrer hilbertd hochbergh hochbergh horgant horgant kalishd kaplandavid kimjaegwon korners kripkes lambertk levinme lewisci lindstromp lindstroms lombardb lycanw lycanwg mackiejl mackiejohnl marcusr martig matesb mcginnc mellordh mellordh mortona mostowskia neales neales neales needhamp olsonk papa parsonsc pollockj prioran quinewv quinewvo quinew quinewillardvanorman quinewv quinewv quinewv quinewv mcgeevann rortyr rortyr rosenberga russellbertrand russelb sainsburym saintpulgentm scottd searlejohnr searlejr sharvyr sharvyr sharvyr skyrmsb sleighrc smullyanaf smullyanaf sternc strawsonpf strawsonpf strawsonpf strawsonp strawsonpf strawsonp tarskia taylorb taylorb thomasonrh trenholmer vanbenthemj vanfraassenb vendlerz vendlerzeno wagnersj wallacej wedberganders wedberga westerstahld russellb widerkerd widerkerd williamsonj wilsonneil wilsonnl wilsonnl wittgensteinl achinsteinp","cluster_0"
-0.6139465754293313,-0.46004870100860346,38.0,28.0,28.0,0.0,1.0,1994.0,103.0,411.0,303.0,336.0,34.0,"J","PRICE, H",,,,"PRICE, H",,,"A NEGLECTED ROUTE TO REALISM ABOUT QUANTUM-MECHANICS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"ASYMMETRY",,,"PRICE, H (reprint author), UNIV SYDNEY,SCH PHILOSOPHY,SYDNEY,NSW 2006,AUSTRALIA.",,,,,,"Bell J., 1987, SPEAKABLE UNSPEAKABL; Bell J.S., 1964, Physics, V1, P195; Bohm D., 1951, QUANTUM THEORY; BUTTERFIELD J, 1994, LMPS91 SELECTED PAPE; CLIFTON R, 1992, PSA 1992, V1, P114; COSTADEBEAUREGA.O, 1977, NUOVO CIMENTO, V42B, P41; COSTADEBEAUREGA.O, 1979, NUOVO CIMENTO, V51B, P267; CRAMER JG, 1988, INT J THEOR PHYS, V27, P227, DOI 10.1007/BF00670751 ; CRAMER JG, 1986, REV MOD PHYS, V58, P647, DOI 10.1103/RevModPhys.58.647; DAVIDSON WC, 1976, NUOVO CIMENTO, V36B, P34; Davies P.C.W, 1986, GHOST ATOM; d'Espagnat B., 1989, REALITY PHYSICIST; DESPAGNAT B, 1989, QUANTUM THEORY PICTU, P89; DUMMETT M, 1964, PHILOS REV, V73, P338, DOI 10.2307/2183661 ; Einstein A, 1935, PHYS REV, V47, P0777, DOI 10.1103/PhysRev.47.777 ; GRIBBIN J, 1990, NEW SCI 1124, P33; HORWICH P, 1975, J PHILOS, V72, P432, DOI 10.2307/2025013 ; Horwich P., 1987, ASYMMETRIES TIME; HULL D, 1992, PSA 1992, V1; JACKSON F, 1977, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V55, P3, DOI 10.1080/00048407712341001 ; LEWIS D, 1976, AM PHILOS QUART, V13, P145; Lockwood M., 1989, MIND BRAIN QUANTUM C; Maudlin T., 1994, QUANTUM NONLOCALITY; Mermin David, 1981, J PHILOS, V78, P397; MERMIN ND, 1990, PHYS TODAY, V43, P9; MERMIN ND, 1985, PHYS TODAY, V38, P38, DOI 10.1063/1.880968; Penrose R., 1989, EMPERORS NEW MIND; PRAWITZ D, 1994, LMPS91 SELECTED PAPE; PRICE H, 1991, FOUND PHYS, V21, P959, DOI 10.1007/BF00733218; PRICE H, 1992, MIND, V101, P501, DOI 10.1093/mind/101.403.501 ; Price H., 1984, SYNTHESE, V16, P299, DOI [10.1007/BF00485056, DOI 10.1007/BF00485056]; Price H., 1993, PSA 1992, V2, P253; PRICE H, 1991, NEW SCI 0112, P55; RIETDIJK CW, 1978, FOUND PHYS, V8, P615, DOI 10.1007/BF00717585 ; Schommers W., 1989, QUANTUM THEORY PICTU; SCHULMAN LS, 1986, J STATISTICAL PHYSIC, V42; SUTHERLAND RI, 1983, INT J THEOR PHYS, V22, P377, DOI 10.1007/BF02082904 ; THOM P, 1974, PHILOS STUD, V27, P211","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/103.411.303",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","NY276","WOS:A1994NY27600003",,,,,"2018-01-02",175.0,"belljs bohmd butterfieldj cliftonr costadebeauregao costadebeauregao cramerjg cramerjg davidsonwc daviespcw despagnatb despagnatb dummettm einsteina gribbinj horwichp horwichp hulld jacksonf lewisd lockwoodm maudlint mermindavid merminnd merminnd penroser prawitzd priceh priceh priceh priceh priceh rietdijkcw schommersw schulmanls sutherlandri thomp bellj","cluster_3"
-0.3934151657955612,-0.34316376919009584,24.0,28.0,28.0,0.0,0.0,1991.0,100.0,399.0,325.0,340.0,16.0,"J","CURRIE, G",,,,"CURRIE, G",,,"WORK AND TEXT","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"UNIV MARYLAND,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,COLLEGE PK,MD 20742","CURRIE, G (reprint author), UNIV OTAGO,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,POB 56,DUNEDIN,NEW ZEALAND.",,,"Currie, Gregory/0000-0001-8364-997X",,,"BORGES JL, 1964, FICCIONES; CURRIE G, IN PRESS PHILOS LIT; CURRIE G, 1989, ONTOLOGY ART; Currie Gregory, 1990, NATURE FICTION; CURRIE G, 1991, LIT THEORY PHILOS; Danto A. C., 1981, TRANSFIGURATION COMM; DUTTON D, 1983, FORGERS ART; Goodman Nelson, 1988, RECONCEPTIONS PHILOS; Goodman N., 1968, LANGUAGES ART; INGARDEN Roman, 1973, LIT WORK ART; JUHL PD, 1990, INTERPRETATION; KIVY P, 1987, AM PHILOS QUART, V24, P245; MUNITZ M. K., 2005, IDENTITY INDIVIDUATI; LEVINSON J, 1980, J PHILOS, V77, P5, DOI 10.2307/2025596 ; Lewis D., 1986, PLURALITY WORLDS; Lewis D., 1973, COUNTERFACTUALS; PRIOR E, 1982, PHILOS STUD, V42, P209; Savile Anthony, 1982, TEST TIME; TANSELLE T, 1990, STUDIES BIBLIO, V44, P1; TILGHAM BR, 1982, J AESTHETICS ART CRI, V4, P293; TOLHURST WE, 1979, BRIT J AESTHET, V19, P3, DOI 10.1093/bjaesthetics/19.1.3 ; TOLHURST WE, 1979, PHILOS STUD, V35, P187, DOI 10.1007/BF00377748 ; WALTON K, 1987, CONCEPT STYLE; WREEN M, 1990, BRIT J AESTHET, V30, P149, DOI 10.1093/bjaesthetics/30.2.149","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","FY889","WOS:A1991FY88900001",,,,,"2018-01-02",176.0,"currieg currieg curriegregory currieg dantoac duttond goodmannelson goodmann ingardenroman juhlpd kivyp munitzmk levinsonj lewisd lewisd priore savileanthony tansellet tilghambr tolhurstwe tolhurstwe waltonk wreenm borgesjl","cluster_3"
-0.35990563017271343,-0.4157030523385283,12.0,28.0,28.0,0.0,0.0,1991.0,100.0,398.0,237.0,264.0,28.0,"J","TRAVIS, C",,,,"TRAVIS, C",,,"CRITICAL NOTICE - ANNALS OF ANALYSIS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"TRAVIS, C (reprint author), ILLINOIS STATE UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,NORMAL,IL 61761, USA.",,,"Travis, Charles/0000-0003-2370-7685",,,"Austin J. L., 1962, SENSE SENSIBILIA; Evans G., 1982, VARIETIES REFERENCE; Frege G, 1918, LOGICAL INVESTIGATIO; Kripke S., 1972, SEMANTICS NATURAL LA, P253, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_9; McDowell John, 1980, PHILOS SUBJECTS, P117; MCDOWELL JH, 1982, P BRIT ACADEMY, V68; Putnam H., 1975, PHILOS PAPERS, V2; SNOWDON P, 1980, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V86; Sperber D., 1986, RELEVANCE; TRAVIS C, 1989, USES SENSE; Wittgenstein L., 1953, PHILOS INVESTIGATION; WODEHOUSE PG, 1988, WORLD JEEVES","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","FK600","WOS:A1991FK60000004",,,,,"2018-01-02",177.0,"evansg fregeg kripkes mcdowelljohn mcdowelljh putnamh snowdonp sperberd travisc wittgensteinl wodehousepg austinjl","cluster_0"
-0.060689719654463195,-0.07528318811033051,2.0,28.0,29.0,0.0,1.0,1980.0,89.0,354.0,182.0,195.0,14.0,"J","SCHWARTZ, SP",,,,"SCHWARTZ, SP",,,"NATURAL KINDS AND NOMINAL KINDS + PUTNAM,HILARY","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"SCHWARTZ, SP (reprint author), ITHACA COLL,ITHACA,NY 14850, USA.",,,,,,"PUTNAM H, 1975, LANGUAGE MIND KNOWLE, P162; SCHWARZ S, 1978, PHILOS REV, P566","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","JS486","WOS:A1980JS48600002",,,,,"2018-01-02",178.0,"schwarzs putnamh","cluster_0"
-0.9342514784030123,-0.936300728131017,54.0,27.0,28.0,0.0,1.0,2005.0,114.0,456.0,1005.0,1037.0,33.0,"J","Kripke, S",,,,"Kripke, S",,,"Russell's notion of scope","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"INDEFINITE DESCRIPTIONS; DEFINITE","Despite the renown of 'On Denoting', much criticism has ignored or misconstrued Russell's treatment of scope, particularly in intensional, but also in extensional contexts. This has been rectified by more recent commentators, yet it remains largely unnoticed that the examples Russell gives of scope distinctions are questionable or inconsistent with his own philosophy. Nevertheless, Russell is right: scope does matter in intensional contexts. In Principia Mathematica, Russell proves a metatheorem to the effect that the scope of a single occurrence of a description in an extensional context does not matter, provided existence and uniqueness conditions are satisfied. But attempts to eliminate descriptions in more complicated cases may produce an analysis with more occurrences of descriptions than featured in the analysand. Taking alternation and negation to be primitive (as in the first edition of Principia), this can be resolved, although the proof is non-trivial. Taking the Sheffer stroke to be primitive (as proposed by Russell in the second edition), with bad choices of scope the analysis fails to terminate.","CUNY, Grad Ctr, New York, NY 10016 USA","Kripke, S (reprint author), CUNY, Grad Ctr, 365 5th Ave, New York, NY 10016 USA.",,,,,,"ALMOG J, 1986, J PHILOS, V83, P210, DOI 10.2307/2026532 ; BOOLOS G, 1984, J PHILOS, V81, P430, DOI 10.2307/2026308 ; CATON C., 1963, PHILOS ORDINARY LANG; CHURCH A, 1950, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V15; DAVIDSON D, 1980, ESSAYS ACTIONS EVENT; DONNELLAN KS, 1966, PHILOS REV, V75, P281, DOI 10.2307/2183143 ; EVANS G, 1977, CAN J PHILOS, V7, P467; FERERMAN S, 1986, GODEL COLLECTED WORK; Frege G., 1892, Z PHILOS PHILOS KRIT, V100, P25; FRENCH PA, 1989, CONT PERSPECTIVES PH; GOLDFARB WD, 1979, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V44, P351, DOI 10.2307/2273128; Graff D, 2001, PHILOS STUD, V102, P1, DOI 10.1023/A:1010379409594 ; Hilbert D., 1934, GRUNDLAGEN MATH, VI; Hylton P, 1990, RUSSELL IDEALISM EME; Irvine A. D., 1993, RUSSELL ANAL PHILOS; KALISH D, 1964, LOGIC TECHNIQUES FOR; KRIPKE S, UNPUB PRESUPPOSITION; KRIPKE S., 1980, NAMING NECESSITY; LUDLOW P, 1991, LINGUIST PHILOS, V14, P171, DOI 10.1007/BF00627402 ; MARSH R. C, 1956, LOGIC KNOWLEDGE; MATES B, 1973, FOUND LANG, V10, P409; MENDELSON E, Z LOGIC GRUNDLAGEN M; Neale S., 1990, DESCRIPTIONS; NEALE S., 2001, FACING FACTS; Nelson Edward, 1986, PREDICATIVE ARITHMET; Nicod J.G.P, 1916, P CAMBRIDGE PHILOS S, V19, P32; ORENSTEIN A, 1999, KNOWLEDGE LANGUAGE L; Ostertag G., 1998, DEFINITE DESCRIPTION; Pears D. F, 1972, B RUSSELL COLLECTION; Prior A. N., 1968, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V42, P91; QUINE W. V., 1981, THEORIES THINGS; Quine Willard Van Orman, 1960, WORD OBJECT; Quine Willard V. O., 1953, LOGICAL POINT VIEW; Quine W. V. O., 1966, WAYS PARADOX OTHER E; Quine Willard V. O., 1940, MATH LOGIC; QUINE WVO, 1956, J PHILOS; RUSSELL B, 1957, MIND, V66, P385; RUSSELL B, PHILOS LOGICAL ATOMI; Russel B, 1905, MIND, V14, P479, DOI DOI 10.1093/MIND/XIV.4.479; Salmon N, 2005, MIND, V114, P1069, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzi1069; Salmon N., 1986, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, V27, P401, DOI 10.1305/ndjfl/1093636683; Salmon N, 1986, FREGES PUZZLE; SALMON N, 1988, PROPOSITIONS ATTITUE; SCHILPP PA, 2004, PHILOS B RUSSELL; Shoenfield J, 1967, MATH LOGIC; Smullyan A. F., 1948, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V13, P31; Soames S., 2003, DAWN ANAL; Stalnaker Robert, 1968, NOUS, V2, P359; Strawson PF, 1950, MIND, V59, P320; Strawson P., 1964, THEORIA-SPAIN, V30, P96, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1755-2567.1964.TB00404.X; THOMASON R, 1947, FORMAL PHILOS SELECT, P247; WEYL H, 1918, KONTINUUM; WILSON G, 1978, PHILOS REV, V87, P48, DOI 10.2307/2184347 ; Woodfield A., 1982, THOUGHT OBJECT ESSAY","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzi1005",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","023FL","WOS:000236111100007",,,,,"2018-01-02",180.0,"boolosg catonc churcha davidsond donnellanks evansg ferermans fregeg frenchpa goldfarbwd graffd hilbertd hyltonp irvinead kalishd kripkes kripkes ludlowp marshrc matesb mendelsone neales neales nelsonedward nicodjgp orensteina ostertagg pearsdf prioran quinewv quinewillardvanorman quinewillardvo quinewvo quinewillardvo quinewvo russellb russellb russelb salmonn salmonn salmonn salmonn schilpppa shoenfieldj smullyanaf soamess stalnakerrobert strawsonpf strawsonp thomasonr weylh wilsong woodfielda almogj","cluster_0"
-1.1920308857817865,-1.1789003788276544,74.0,27.0,27.0,0.0,0.0,2005.0,114.0,455.0,565.0,614.0,50.0,"J","MacBride, F",,,,"MacBride, F",,,"The particular-universal distinction: A dogma of metaphysics?","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"ONTOLOGY; COULD",,"Univ London Birkbeck Coll, Sch Philosophy, London WC1E 7HX, England","MacBride, F (reprint author), Univ London Birkbeck Coll, Sch Philosophy, Malet St, London WC1E 7HX, England.","fmacbride@bbk.ac.uk",,,,,"Armstrong David, 1978, THEORY UNIVERSALS; ARMSTRONG DM, 1983, WHAT LAW NATURE; Armstrong D.M., 1997, WORLD STATES AFFAIRS; Armstrong DM, 1978, NOMINALISM REALISM; Armstrong D. M., 1989, COMBINATORIAL THEORY; AUSTIN JL, 1962, SENSE SENSIBLILIA; Ayer A. J., 1954, PHILOS ESSAYS, P1; BACON J, 1993, ONTOLOGY CAUSALITY M; BENACERRAF P, 1965, PHILOS REV, V74, P47, DOI 10.2307/2183530 ; BERGMANN G, 1958, PHILOS REV, V58, P437; Bergmann G., 1967, REALISM CRITIQUE BRE; Bergmann Gustav, 1959, MEANING EXISTENCE; Bigelow J., 1990, SCI NECESSITY; Bolzano Bernard, 1851, PARADOXES INFINITE; BRADLEY FH, 1911, MIND, V19, P74; Bradley F. H, 1897, APPEARANCE REALITY M; Chandler Hugh S., 1971, NOUS, V5, P313; CURRIE G, 1984, FREGE TRADITION INFL, P144; Dummett Michael, 1973, FREGE PHILOS LANGUAG; Frege Gottlob, 1980, PHILOS MATH CORRESPO; Frege G., 1952, TRANSLATIONS PHILOS; Frege Gottlob, 1979, POSTHUMOUS WRITINGS; Geach P. T., 1979, TRUTH LOVE IMMORTALI; Grandy Richard E, 1976, SYNTHESE, V32, P395; GRICE HP, 1956, PHILOS REV, V65, P141, DOI 10.2307/2182828 ; GROSSMANN R, 1961, PHILOS REV, V70, P23, DOI 10.2307/2183403 ; HOCHBERG H, 1981, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V6, P215; HOCHBERG H, 2001, RUSSELL MOORE WITTGE, P175; HOCHBERG H, 2004, GRAZER PHILOS STUDIE, V67, P195; KLEMKE ED, 1968, ESSAYS FREGE; Leonard Henry S., 1940, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V5, P45; LEWIS D, 1983, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V61, P343, DOI 10.1080/00048408312341131 ; Lewis D., 1986, PLURALITY WORLDS; LILLEHAMMER H, 2005, RAMSEYS LEGACY; Lowe EJ, 2004, DIALECTICA, V58, P335; Lowe E. J., 2002, SURVEY METAPHYSICS; LOWE EJ, 1998, POSSIBILITY METAPHYS; MacBride F, 2004, DIALECTICA, V58, P317; MacBride F, 1999, MIND, V108, P471, DOI 10.1093/mind/108.431.471 ; MacBride F, 1998, DIALECTICA, V52, P203; MacBride F, 1998, ANALYSIS, V58, P27, DOI 10.1111/1467-8284.00098 ; MACBRIDE F, 1995, FACTS CAUSATION; MACBRIDE F, 2004, GRAZER PHILOS STUDIE, V67, P181; MACBRIDE F, 2005, RAMSEYS ONTOLOGY MET, P61; MacBride F., 2001, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V79, P81; MORTENSEN C, 1987, REV INT PHILOS, V41, P97; MORTON A, 1975, NOUS, V9, P309, DOI 10.2307/2214634 ; MUNDY B, 1990, J PHILOS LOGIC, V18, P115; Newman A, 1992, PHYS BASIS PREDICTIO; Oliver A, 2001, PHILOS QUART, V51, P289; Quine W. V., 1977, MIDWEST STUDIES PHIL, V2; Quine W. V., 1951, PHILOS REV, V60, P20, DOI DOI 10.2307/2181906; RAMSEY F.P., 1990, PHILOS PAPERS; Ramsey F. P., 1926, P AR SOC, V6, P17; Ramsey F.P., 1925, MIND, V34, P401; Russell B, 1924, CONT BRIT PHILOS; RUSSELL B, 1910, PHILOS PAPERS; Russell Bertrand, 1956, LOGIC KNOWLEDGE; Russell B., 1910, PRINCIPIA MATH, V1-3; RUSSELL B, 1911, P AR SOC, P105; RUSSELL B, 1956, AM J MATH, P59; RUSSELL B, 1927, OUTLIE PHILOS; Sahlin N, 1990, PHILOS FP RAMSEY; SCHEIN, 1993, PLURALS EVENTS; Sellars W., 1948, PHILOS SCI, V15, P287; Simons P., 1992, THEORIA-SPAIN, V57, P150; SKYRMS B, 1981, PHILOS STUD, V40, P199, DOI 10.1007/BF00353791 ; TAYLOR B, 1992, LOGIQUE ANAL, P139; TOOLEY M, 1987, CAUSATION REALIST AP; Whitehead AlfredNorth, 1920, CONCEPT NATURE; WILLIAMS DC, 1986, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V64, P1, DOI 10.1080/00048408612342191 ; Williams D. C., 1953, REV METAPHYS, V7, P171; Wisdom J., 1934, PROBLEMS MIND MATTER; Wittgenstein L., 1922, TRACTATUS LOGICO PHI","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzi565",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","952WY","WOS:000231037900003",,,,,"2018-01-02",181.0,"armstrongdm armstrongdm armstrongdm armstrongdm austinjl ayeraj baconj benacerrafp bergmanng bergmanng bergmanngustav bigelowj bolzanobernard bradleyfh bradleyfh chandlerhughs currieg dummettmichael fregegottlob fregeg fregegottlob geachpt grandyricharde gricehp grossmannr hochbergh hochbergh hochbergh klemkeed leonardhenrys lewisd lewisd lillehammerh loweej loweej loweej macbridef macbridef macbridef macbridef macbridef macbridef macbridef macbridef mortensenc mortona mundyb newmana olivera quinewv quinewv ramseyfp ramseyfp ramseyfp russellb russellb russellbertrand russellb russellb russellb russellb sahlinn schein sellarsw simonsp skyrmsb taylorb tooleym whiteheadalfrednorth williamsdc williamsdc wisdomj wittgensteinl armstrongdavid","cluster_3"
-0.37576718503529116,-0.3034516116847375,8.0,27.0,27.0,0.0,0.0,1997.0,106.0,422.0,263.0,277.0,15.0,"J","Ramachandran, M",,,,"Ramachandran, M",,,"A counterfactual analysis of causation","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"LEWIS",,,"Ramachandran, M (reprint author), UNIV SUSSEX,SCH COGNIT & COMP SCI,BRIGHTON BN1 9QH,E SUSSEX,ENGLAND.",,,"Ramachandran, Murali/0000-0001-5611-518X",,,"GANERI J, 1996, ANALYSIS, V55, P219; Lewis D., 1973, COUNTERFACTUALS; Lewis D., 1973, J PHILOS, V70, P556, DOI DOI 10.2307/2025310; LEWIS D., 1986, PHILOS PAPERS, VII; MCDERMOTT M, 1995, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V73, P129, DOI 10.1080/00048409512346441 ; MENZIES P, 1996, MIND, V105, P85, DOI 10.1093/mind/105.417.85 ; MENZIES P, 1989, PHILOS SCI, V56, P642, DOI 10.1086/289518 ; RAMACHANDRAN M, IN PRESS ACTA ANALYT","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/106.422.263",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","WR328","WOS:A1997WR32800003",,,,,"2018-01-02",182.0,"lewisd lewisd lewisd mcdermottm menziesp menziesp ramachandranm ganerij","cluster_3"
-0.3087048258184409,0.4752884235298968,48.0,27.0,27.0,0.0,1.0,1996.0,105.0,419.0,415.0,450.0,36.0,"J","MCNAMARA, P",,,,"MCNAMARA, P",,,"MAKING ROOM FOR GOING BEYOND THE CALL","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"SUPEREROGATION; ASYMMETRY",,,"MCNAMARA, P (reprint author), UNIV NEW HAMPSHIRE,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,DURHAM,NH 03824, USA.",,,,,,"AQVIST L, 1984, HDB PHILOS LOGIC, V2, P605; ATTFIELD R, 1979, MIND, V88, P481; BROWN M, 1987, J PHILOS, V84, P237; BROWN MA, 1996, DEONTIC LOGIC AGENCY; BURCHILL LM, 1965, PHILOSOPHY, V60, P152; CHISHOLM RM, 1966, SYNTHESE, V16, P321, DOI 10.1007/BF00485086 ; CHISHOLM RM, 1964, AM PHILOS QUART, V1, P147; Chisholm R, 1963, RATIO, V5, P1; Feldman F, 1978, INTRO ETHICS; Feldman F., 1986, DOING BEST WE CAN; FOLLESDAL D, 1971, DEONTIC LOGIC INTRO, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-010-3146-2_1; Gabbay D., 1984, HDB PHILOS LOGIC, V2; Gert B, 1988, MORALITY NEW JUSTIFI; HAHN LE, LIBRARY LIVING PHILO; Heyd D., 1982, SUPEREROGATION ITS S; HILPINEN R., 1971, DEONTIC LOGIC INTRO; Hrushka J., 1987, ARCH FU RECHTS SOZIA, V73, P93; JONES AJI, 1985, SYNTHESE, V65, P275, DOI 10.1007/BF00869304 ; KAGAN S, 1989, LIMITS PHILOS; MARES E, IN PRESS STUDIA LOGI; MCCONNELL TC, 1980, RATIO, V22, P3; MCNAMARA P, 1996, DEONTIC LOGIC AGENCY, P154; MCNAMARA PF, IN PRESS LIBRARY LIV; MCNAMARA PF, UNPUB SUPEREROGATION; MCNAMARA PF, IN PRESS STUDIA LOGI; MCNAMARA PF, UNPUB SOME EXTENDED; MCNAMARA PF, IN PRESS DEFEASIBLE; MCNAMARA PF, 1990, THESIS UMASS; Melden A., 1958, ESSAYS MORAL PHILOS; Mellema Gregory, 1991, CALL DUTY SUPEREROGA; New Christopher, 1974, PHILOSOPHY, V49/188, P179; NUTE D, IN PRESS DEFEASIBLE; Parfit D., 1984, REASONS PERSONS; PETTIT P, 1991, COMPANION ETHICS, P91; RAZ J, 1975, AM PHILOS QUART, V12, P161; Scheffler Samuel, 1982, REJECTION CONSEQUENT; SCHUMAKER M, 1977, SUPEREROGATION ANAL; SIDER T, 1993, PHILOS STUD, V70, P117, DOI 10.1007/BF00989586 ; Singer Peter, 1991, COMPANION ETHICS; SLOTE M, 1984, J PHILOS, V81, P179, DOI 10.2307/2026119 ; Slote Michael A, 1985, COMMON SENSE MORALIT; STOCKER M, 1967, REV METAPHYSICS, V20; Stocker Michael, 1968, STUDIES MORAL PHILOS, P53; STOCKER M, 1966, THESIS HARVARD U; TRIANOSKY GW, 1986, J PHILOS, V83, P26, DOI 10.2307/2026465 ; Urmson JO, 1958, ESSAYS MORAL PHILOS, P198; WOLF S, 1986, PHILOS TOPICS, V14, P131, DOI 10.5840/philtopics19861427 ; ZIMMERMAN MJ, 1993, AM PHILOS QUART, V30, P373","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/105.419.415",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","UZ497","WOS:A1996UZ49700002",,,,,"2018-01-02",183.0,"attfieldr brownm brownma burchilllm chisholmrm chisholmrm chisholmr feldmanf feldmanf follesdald gabbayd gertb hahnle heydd hilpinenr hrushkaj jonesaji kagans marese mcconnelltc mcnamarap mcnamarapf mcnamarapf mcnamarapf mcnamarapf mcnamarapf mcnamarapf meldena mellemagregory newchristopher nuted parfitd pettitp razj schefflersamuel schumakerm sidert singerpeter slotem slotemichaela stockerm stockermichael stockerm trianoskygw urmsonjo wolfs zimmermanmj aqvistl","cluster_6"
-0.9785800048886389,-0.8459212080145582,34.0,27.0,27.0,0.0,1.0,1993.0,102.0,407.0,429.0,454.0,26.0,"J","RUMFITT, I",,,,"RUMFITT, I",,,"CONTENT AND CONTEXT - THE PARATACTIC THEORY REVISITED AND REVISED","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"RUMFITT, I (reprint author), UNIV KEELE,KEELE ST5 5BG,STAFFS,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"Lepore E., 1986, TRUTH INTERPRETATION, P190; Burge T., 1974, J PHILOS, V71, P205; Cohen L.J., 1980, PHILOS SUBJECTS ESSA, P140; DAVIDSON D, 1979, THEOR DECIS, V11, P27, DOI 10.1007/BF00126690 ; Davidson Donald, 1969, WORDS OBJECTIONS ESS, P158; DAVIDSON D, WORDS OBJECTIONS ESS; DAVIDSON D, 1971, NOUS, V5, P179; DAVIDSON D., 1984, INQUIRIES TRUTH INTE; DAVIDSON D, 1980, ESSAYS ACTIONS EVENT; FINE K, 1981, NOUS, V15, P177, DOI 10.2307/2215323 ; FREGE G, 1984, FREGE COLLECTED PAPE, P390; HIGGINBOTHAM J, 1989, RIV LINGUISTICA, V1, P301; Higginbotham James, 1986, TRUTH INTERPRETATION, P29; HORNSBY J, 1977, ANALYSIS, V37, P177; JESPERSEN O, 1949, MODERN GRAMMAR ENGLI; Kaplan David, 1989, THEMES KAPLAN, P481; Kripke S., 1979, MEANING USE, P239; KRIPKE S., 1980, NAMING NECESSITY; Lepore Ernest, 1986, TRUTH INTERPRETATION; May R., 1985, LOGICAL FORM ITS STR; McDowell J., 1980, REFERENCE TRUTH REAL, P206; McFetridge I. G., 1975, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V76, P131; Parsons C., 1983, MATH PHILOS, P298; Peacocke C., 1976, TRUTH MEANING, P162; PERRY J, 1977, PHILOS REV, V86, P474, DOI 10.2307/2184564 ; Prior A.N., 1971, OBJECTS OF THOUGHT; Quine Willard Van Orman, 1960, WORD OBJECT; QUINE WV, 1969, WORDS OBJECTIONS ESS, P333; Rundle B., 1979, GRAMMAR PHILOS; Salmon N, 1986, FREGES PUZZLE; Schiffer S., 1987, REMNANTS MEANING; STEVENSON RL, 1886, DR JEKYLL AND MR HYD; STRAWSON P., 1959, INDIVIDUALS; Wiggins D., 1980, SAMENESS SUBSTANCE","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/102.407.429",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","LQ102","WOS:A1993LQ10200002",,,,,"2018-01-02",184.0,"burget cohenlj davidsond davidsondonald davidsond davidsond davidsond davidsond finek fregeg higginbothamj higginbothamjames hornsbyj jesperseno kaplandavid kripkes kripkes leporeernest mayr mcdowellj mcfetridgeig parsonsc peacockec perryj prioran quinewillardvanorman quinewv rundleb salmonn schiffers stevensonrl strawsonp wigginsd leporee","cluster_0"
-0.2704219480340553,0.07683246431328951,7.0,27.0,28.0,0.0,2.0,1974.0,83.0,329.0,43.0,60.0,18.0,"J","KIRK, R",,,,"KIRK, R",,,"SENTIENCE AND BEHAVIOUR","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"UNIV NOTTINGHAM,NOTTINGHAM,ENGLAND",,,,,,,"ARMSTRONG DM, 1968, MATERIALIST THEORY M; Campbell K. K., 1970, BODY MIND; LEWIS DK, 1966, J PHILOS, V63, P17, DOI 10.2307/2024524 ; Murdoch Iris, 1970, SOVEREIGNTY GOOD; NAGEL T, 1970, PHILOS REV, V79, P394, DOI 10.2307/2183935 ; PERKINS M, 1971, J PHILOSOPHY, V68, P329; Wiggins D, 1967, IDENTITY SPATIO TEMP","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","S6759","WOS:A1974S675900003",,,,,"2018-01-02",185.0,"campbellkk lewisdk murdochiris nagelt perkinsm wigginsd armstrongdm","cluster_6"
-0.6958990987950855,-0.6135022038439637,46.0,26.0,26.0,0.0,0.0,2011.0,120.0,477.0,11.0,52.0,42.0,"J","Hanks, PW",,,,"Hanks, Peter W.",,,"Structured Propositions as Types","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"CONDITIONALS","In this paper I defend an account of the nature of propositional content according to which the proposition expressed by a declarative sentence is a certain type of action a speaker performs in uttering that sentence. On this view, the semantic contents of proper names turn out to be types of reference acts. By carefully individuating these types, it is possible to provide new solutions to Frege's puzzles about names in identity- and belief-sentences.","Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA","Hanks, PW (reprint author), Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA.","pwhanks@umn.edu",,,,,"ACKERMANN F, 1979, PHILOS STUD, V35, P55; ALLEN S, 1989, P NOBEL S, V65; Almog J., 1989, THEMES KAPLAN; Austin J. L., 1956, P BRIT ACAD, V42, P109; Bach K, 1997, PAC PHILOS QUART, V78, P215, DOI 10.1111/1468-0114.00036 ; BALTIN Mark, 2001, HDB CONT SYNTACTIC T; BARKER SJ, 1995, PHILOS STUD, V79, P185, DOI 10.1007/BF00989709 ; Bealer G, 1998, MIND, V107, P1, DOI 10.1093/mind/107.425.1 ; Beaney Michael, 1997, FREGE READER; BENACERRAF P, 1965, PHILOS REV, V74, P47, DOI 10.2307/2183530 ; BENNETT J., 2003, PHILOS GUIDE CONDITI; Brandon J., 2003, HERALD TRIBUNE 0605, P1; Burgess JP, 2005, ANALYSIS, V65, P196, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8284.2005.00549.x ; DAVIDSON D., 1984, INQUIRIES TRUTH INTE; DeRose K, 1999, NOUS, V33, P405, DOI 10.1111/0029-4624.00161 ; Devitt M., 1996, COMING TO OUR SENSES; Devitt Michael, 1981, DESIGNATION; Devitt M., 1974, J PHILOS, V71, P183; Dummett Michael, 1978, TRUTH OTHER ENIGMAS; EDGINGTON D, 1995, MIND, V104, P235, DOI 10.1093/mind/104.414.235 ; Evans Gareth, 1973, ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V47, p[187, 1]; Everett A., 2000, EMPTY NAMES FICTION; FRENCH P, 1989, MIDWEST STUDIES PHIL, V14; French P. A., 1979, CONT PERSPECTIVES PH; Hanks P., 2009, PHILOS COMPASS, V4, P1; Hanks PW, 2007, PHILOS STUD, V134, P141, DOI 10.1007/s11098-007-9080-5; Hawthorne John, 2003, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES; HENRICH D, 1977, 1 SYST PHIL MOGL HEG; Irwin T., 1995, ARISTOTLE SELECTIONS; JOSHI A, 1981, ELEMENTS DISCOURSE U; Jubien M, 2001, PHILOS STUD, V104, P47, DOI 10.1023/A:1010361210072 ; KING JC, 1995, NOUS, V29, P516, DOI 10.2307/2216285 ; King J. C., 2007, NATURE STRUCTURE CON; KRIPKE S., 1980, NAMING NECESSITY; Lappin Shalom, 1996, HDB CONT SEMANTIC TH; Levinson S. C., 1983, PRAGMATICS; Perry J., 1993, PROBLEM ESSENTIAL IN; Rumfitt I, 2000, MIND, V109, P781, DOI 10.1093/mind/109.436.781 ; Salmon Nathan U., 1981, REFERENCE ESSENCE; Schiffer Stephen, 2003, THINGS WE MEAN; SMILEY T, 1996, ANALYSIS, V56, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.0003-2638.1996.00001.x ; Soames S., 1989, PHILOS TOPICS, V15, P47, DOI DOI 10.5840/PHILTOPICS198715112; STENIUS E, 1967, SYNTHESE, V17, P254, DOI 10.1007/BF00485030 ; THOMSON J, 2006, CONTENT MODALITY THE; VANBENTHAM J, 1997, HDB LOGIC LANGUAGE; Woods M, 1997, CONDITIONALS","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzr01",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","780XE","WOS:000291893400002",,,,,"2018-01-02",186.0,"allens almogj austinjl bachk baltinmark barkersj bealerg beaneymichael benacerrafp bennettj brandonj burgessjp davidsond derosek devittm devittmichael devittm dummettmichael edgingtond evansgareth everetta frenchp frenchpa hanksp hankspw hawthornejohn henrichd irwint joshia jubienm kingjc kingjc kripkes lappinshalom levinsonsc perryj rumfitti salmonnathanu schifferstephen smileyt soamess steniuse thomsonj vanbenthamj woodsm ackermannf","cluster_0"
-0.9028658309651894,-0.8098933083086883,48.0,26.0,26.0,0.0,0.0,2009.0,118.0,472.0,935.0,962.0,28.0,"J","Ball, D",,,,"Ball, Derek",,,"There Are No Phenomenal Concepts","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"MIND-BODY PROBLEM; KNOWLEDGE ARGUMENT; PHYSICALISM; CONCEIVABILITY; QUALIA","It has long been widely agreed that some concepts can be possessed only by those who have undergone a certain type of phenomenal experience. Orthodoxy among contemporary philosophers of mind has it that these phenomenal concepts provide the key to understanding many disputes between physicalists and their opponents, and in particular offer an explanation of Mary's predicament in the situation exploited by Frank Jackson's knowledge argument. I reject the orthodox view; I deny that there are phenomenal concepts. My arguments exploit the sort of considerations that are typically used to motivate externalism about mental content. Although physicalists often appeal to phenomenal concepts to defend their view against the knowledge argument, I argue that this is a mistake. The knowledge argument depends on phenomenal concepts; if there are no phenomenal concepts, then the knowledge argument fails.","Univ St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9AL, Fife, Scotland","Ball, D (reprint author), Univ St Andrews, 17-19 Coll St, St Andrews KY16 9AL, Fife, Scotland.","db71@st-andrews.ac.uk",,,,,"Alter T, 1998, PHILOS STUD, V90, P35, DOI 10.1023/A:1004290020847 ; Alter T., 2007, PHENOMENAL CONCEPTS; Ball D, 2007, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V85, P457, DOI 10.1080/00048400701572220; Balog K, 1999, PHILOS REV, V108, P497, DOI 10.2307/2998286 ; BEALER G, 1994, J PHILOS, V91, P185, DOI 10.2307/2940770 ; Flanagan Owen, 1997, CONSCIOUSNESS PHILOS; BURGE T, 1986, J PHILOS, V83, P697, DOI 10.2307/2026694 ; BURGE T, 1993, METAPHILOSOPHY, V24, P309, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9973.1993.tb00198.x ; BYRNE A, 2006, NOTRE DAME PHILOS RE, V1; chalmers D., 1996, CONSCIOUS MIND; CONEE E, 1994, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V72, P136, DOI 10.1080/00048409412345971 ; CRANE T, 1991, PHILOS QUART, V41, P1, DOI 10.2307/2219783 ; Davidson D., 1972, SEMANTICS NATURAL LA; Dennett Daniel, 1991, CONSCIOUSNESS EXPLAI; Donnellan K. S., 1993, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V7, P155; Fodor J. A., 1998, CONCEPTS COGNITIVE S; GERTLER B, 1999, PHILOS STUD, V96, P317; Graham G, 2000, PHILOS STUD, V99, P59, DOI 10.1023/A:1018779425306 ; GUTTENPLAN M, 1996, COMPANION PHILOS MIN; Hill CS, 1997, PHILOS STUD, V87, P61, DOI 10.1023/A:1017911200883 ; Holman EL, 2006, PHILOS STUD, V128, P229, DOI 10.1007/s11098-004-7791-4; JACKSON F, 1982, PHILOS QUART, V32, P127, DOI 10.2307/2960077 ; Kripke S, 1972, NAMING NECESSITY; Lewis David, 2003, PHILOS ISSUES, V13, P113; Locke John, 1690, ESSAY CONCERNING HUM; LUDLOW P, 1993, INDIVIDUALISM SELF K; Ludlow P, 2004, THERES SOMETHING MAR; Lycan William G., 1996, CONSCIOUSNESS EXPERI; METZINGER T, 1996, CONSCIOUS EXPERIENCE; Trout J. D., 1995, CONT MAT READER; Nadel Lynn, 2003, ENCY COGNITIVE SCI; Nida-Rumelin M, 1998, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V58, P51, DOI 10.2307/2653630 ; Nida-Rumelin Martine, 2002, STANFORD ENCY PHILOS; Papineau David, 1993, PHILOS NATURALISM; Papineau David, 2002, THINKING CONSCIOUSNE; Perry John, 2001, KNOWLEDGE POSSIBILIT; Putnam H., 1975, MIND LANGUAGE REALIT, V2; Robinson H., 1993, OBJECTIONS PHYSICALI; Stoljar D, 2005, MIND LANG, V20, P469, DOI 10.1111/j.0268-1064.2005.00296.x ; STURGEON S, 1994, J PHILOS, V91, P221, DOI 10.2307/2940751 ; Tye M, 2003, ROY I PH S, V53, P91, DOI 10.1017/S1358246100008286; Tye M, 2000, CONSCIOUSNESS COLOR; Tye Michael, 1995, 10 PROBLEMS CONSCIOU; VILLANUEVA E, 1991, INFORM SEMANTICS EPI; WARNER R, 1986, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V64, P249, DOI 10.1080/00048408612342471 ; WHITE S, 2006, OXFORD STUDIES METAP, V2, P91; Woodfield A., 1982, THOUGHT OBJECT ESSAY; Wright C., 1998, KNOWING OUR OWN MIND","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzp134",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","568WY","WOS:000275557900002",,,,,"2018-01-02",187.0,"altert balld balogk bealerg flanaganowen burget burget byrnea chalmersd coneee cranet davidsond dennettdaniel donnellanks fodorja gertlerb grahamg guttenplanm hillcs holmanel jacksonf kripkes lewisdavid lockejohn ludlowp ludlowp lycanwilliamg metzingert troutjd nadellynn nidarumelinm nidarumelinmartine papineaudavid papineaudavid perryjohn putnamh robinsonh stoljard sturgeons tyem tyem tyemichael villanuevae warnerr whites woodfielda wrightc altert","cluster_0"
-0.7283396445953503,-0.6354606918006331,22.0,26.0,26.0,0.0,0.0,2005.0,114.0,455.0,615.0,637.0,23.0,"J","Merricks, T",,,,"Merricks, T",,,"Composition and vagueness","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"'OBJECTS-AND-PERSONS'",,"Univ Virginia, Dept Philosophy, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA","Merricks, T (reprint author), Univ Virginia, Dept Philosophy, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA.","merricks@virginia.edu",,,,,"Armstrong D.M., 1997, WORLD STATES AFFAIRS; BAXTER DLM, 1988, MIND, V97, P575; Gale R., 2002, BLACKWELL GUIDE META; Heller M., 1990, ONTOLOGY PHYS OBJECT; HESTEVOLT HS, 1980, PHILOS PHENOMENOLOGI, V41, P371; HOWARDSNYDER F, 1991, PAC PHILOS QUART, V72, P101; Hudson H., 2001, MATERIALIST METAPHYS; Lewis D., 1986, PLURALITY WORLDS; Lewis D.K., 1991, PARTS CLASSES; Markosian N, 1998, PHILOS STUD, V92, P211, DOI 10.1023/A:1004267523392 ; Merricks T, 2003, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V67, P727, DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00322.x ; Merricks T, 2003, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V67, P700, DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00318.x ; Merricks T., 2001, OBJECTS PERSONS; QUINE W. V., 1981, THEORIES THINGS; Rea M. C., 1997, MAT CONSTITUTION REA; Searle J., 1991, REDISCOVERY MIND; Sider T, 1997, PHILOS REV, V106, P197, DOI 10.2307/2998357 ; Sider T, 2003, PHILOS STUD, V114, P135, DOI 10.1023/A:1024465319036 ; Sider T., 2001, 4 DIMENSIONALISM ONT; SIDER T, IN PRESS PARTHOOD; VANCLEVE J, 1893, MIDWEST STUDIES PHIL, V9; van Inwagen P., 1990, MAT BEINGS","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzi615",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","952WY","WOS:000231037900004",,,,,"2018-01-02",188.0,"baxterdlm galer hellerm hestevolths howardsnyderf hudsonh lewisd lewisdk markosiann merrickst merrickst merrickst quinewv reamc searlej sidert sidert sidert sidert vanclevej vaninwagenp armstrongdm","cluster_3"
-0.3950836853751854,-0.3226176148148494,12.0,26.0,27.0,0.0,1.0,1995.0,104.0,414.0,355.0,368.0,14.0,"J","HORWICH, P",,,,"HORWICH, P",,,"MEANING, USE AND TRUTH - ON WHETHER A USE-THEORY OF MEANING IS PRECLUDED BY THE REQUIREMENT THAT WHATEVER CONSTITUTES THE MEANING OF A PREDICATE BE CAPABLE OF DETERMINING THE SET OF THINGS OF WHICH THE PREDICATE IS TRUE AND TO WHICH IT OUGHT TO BE APPLIED","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"KRIPKE",,,"HORWICH, P (reprint author), UNIV LONDON UNIV COLL,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,GOWER ST,LONDON WC1E 6BT,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"BLACKBURN S, 1984, SYNTHESE, V10, P281; BOGHOSSIAN PA, 1989, MIND, V98, P507; Field H., 1986, FACT SCI MORALITY; GOLDFARB W, 1985, J PHILOS, V82, P471, DOI 10.2307/2026277 ; Horwich P., 1990, TRUTH; Kripke Saul Aaron, 1982, WITTGENSTEIN RULES P; Leeds S., 1978, ERKENNTNIS, V13, P111; Peacocke C., 1992, STUDY CONCEPTS; QUINE WV, 1990, PURSUITE TRUTH; WILLIAMS M, 1986, PHILOS TOPICS, V14, P223, DOI 10.5840/philtopics198614119 ; Wittgenstein L., 1953, PHILOS INVESTIGATION; WRIGHT C, 1984, J PHILOS, V81, P759, DOI 10.2307/2026031","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/104.414.355",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","QX948","WOS:A1995QX94800003",,,,,"2018-01-02",189.0,"boghossianpa fieldh goldfarbw horwichp kripkesaulaaron leedss peacockec quinewv williamsm wittgensteinl wrightc blackburns","cluster_0"
-0.36119191685940255,-0.3484307204185135,19.0,26.0,27.0,0.0,0.0,1981.0,90.0,358.0,161.0,183.0,23.0,"J","CHERNIAK, C",,,,"CHERNIAK, C",,,"MINIMAL RATIONALITY","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"CHERNIAK, C (reprint author), TUFTS UNIV,BOSTON,MA 02111, USA.",,,,,,"Campbell DT, 1974, PHILOS K POPPER, V1; CHERNIAK C, UNPUBLISHED; DAVIDSON D, 1963, J PHILOS; DAVIDSON D, 1974, EXPERIENCE THEORY; DAVIDSON D, 1976, PHILOS MIND; DENNETT DC, 1971, J PHILOS; DENNETT DC, UNPUBLISHED; GOLDMAN A, 1978, J PHILOS, P510; Hintikka J., 1962, KNOWLEDGE BELIEF; McGuire W. J., 1969, HDB SOCIAL PSYCHOL; Neumann J. V., 1944, THEORY GAMES EC BEHA; Quine Willard Van Orman, 1960, WORD OBJECT; Quine W. V., 1969, ONTOLOGICAL RELATIVI; Quine W.V., 1961, LOGICAL POINT VIEW; Rorty A, 1976, IDENTITY PERSONS; RUSSELL B, 1971, LOGIC KNOWLEDGE, P311; Ryle Gilbert, 1949, CONCEPT MIND; Simon Herbert A., 1957, MODELS MAN; VERMAZEN B, 1968, PHILOS PHENOMENOLOGI","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","LN737","WOS:A1981LN73700001",,,,,"2018-01-02",190.0,"cherniakc davidsond davidsond davidsond dennettdc dennettdc goldmana hintikkaj mcguirewj neumannjv quinewillardvanorman quinewv quinewv rortya russellb rylegilbert simonherberta vermazenb campbelldt","cluster_0"
-0.1963097771653052,-0.15715870422516515,16.0,26.0,26.0,0.0,1.0,1976.0,85.0,337.0,112.0,119.0,8.0,"J","HAACK, S",,,,"HAACK, S",,,"JUSTIFICATION OF DEDUCTION","MIND",,,"English","Note",,,,,,,,,"UNIV WARWICK,WARWICK,ENGLAND",,,,,,,"BARKER SF, 1965, PHILOSOPHY AM; BELNAP ND, 1961, ANALYSIS; BELNAP ND, 1967, PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC; BLACK M, 1954, PROBLEMS ANALYSIS; BROUWER LEJ, 1952, S AFRICAN J SCIENCE; Carnap R., 1968, PROBLEM INDUCTIVE LO; CARROLL L, 1895, MIND; POPPER K, 1959, LOGIC SCIENTIFIC DIS; PRIOR A, 1960, ANALYSIS; PRIOR AN, 1964, ANALYSIS; PRIOR AN, 1967, PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC; QUINE WV, 1936, WAYS PARADOX; SALMON WC, 1966, F SCIENTIFIC INFEREN; STRAWSON JT, 1961, ANALYSIS; Strawson P. F., 1952, INTRO LOGICAL THEORY; THOMSON JF, 1963, RATIO","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","BD443","WOS:A1976BD44300014",,,,,"2018-01-02",191.0,"belnapnd belnapnd blackm brouwerlej carnapr carrolll popperk priora prioran prioran quinewv salmonwc strawsonjt strawsonpf thomsonjf barkersf","cluster_0"
-0.2874301816205773,-0.2676509773450457,15.0,25.0,25.0,0.0,0.0,2002.0,111.0,443.0,519.0,550.0,32.0,"J","Pettit, D",,,,"Pettit, D",,,"Why knowledge is unnecessary for understanding language (Against the epistemic view)","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"It is a natural thought that understanding language consists in possessing knowledge--to understand a word is to know what it means. It is also natural to suppose that this knowledge is propositional knowledge--to know what a word means is to know that it means such-and-such. Thus it is prima facie plausible to suppose that understanding a bit of language consists in possessing propositional knowledge of its meaning. I refer to this as the epistemic view of understanding language. The theoretical appeal of this view for the philosophy of language is that it provides for an attractive account of the project of the theory of meaning. If understanding language consists in possessing propositional knowledge of the meanings of expressions, then a meaning theory amounts to a theory of what speakers know in virtue of understanding language. In this paper I argue that, despite its intuitive and theoretical appeal, the epistemic view is false. Propositional knowledge is not necessary for understanding language, not even tacit knowledge. Unlike knowledge, I argue, linguistic understanding does not fail in Gettier cases, does not require epistemic warrant and does not even require belief. The intuitions about knowledge that have been central to epistemology do not seem to hold for linguistic understanding. So unless epistemologists have been radically mistaken about what knowledge requires , knowledge is unnecessary for understanding language.","MIT, Dept Linguist & Philos, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA","Pettit, D (reprint author), MIT, Dept Linguist & Philos, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.",,,,,,"CAMPBELL J, 1982, PHILOS QUART, V32, P17, DOI 10.2307/2218998 ; Davies M., 1989, REFLECTIONS CHOMSKY, P131; Davies Martin, 1989, REFLECTIONS CHOMSKY; DRETSKE F, 1988, EXPLAINING BEHAVIOR; DRETSKE FI, 1981, KNOWLEDGE FLOW INFO; DUMMETT M, 1991, LOGICAL BASIS METPAH; DUMMETT M, 1993, SEAS LANGUAGE, P94; Evans Gareth, 1981, WITTGENSTEIN FOLLOW; GETTIER E. L., 1963, ANALYSIS, V23, P121, DOI DOI 10.1093/ANALYS/23.6.121; HECK RG, 1995, MIND, V104, P79, DOI 10.1093/mind/104.413.79 ; HIGGINBOTHAM J, 1992, PHILOS STUD, V65, P3, DOI 10.1007/BF00571313 ; Holtzman S., 1981, WITTGENSTEIN FOLLOW; Hunter D, 1998, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V58, P559, DOI 10.2307/2653756 ; STANLEY J, 2001, J PHILOS, V98, P559; Wright C., 1986, REALISM MEANING TRUT","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/111.443.519",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","575MK","WOS:000176949900001",,,,,"2018-01-02",192.0,"daviesm daviesmartin dretskef dretskefi dummettm dummettm evansgareth gettierel heckrg higginbothamj holtzmans hunterd stanleyj wrightc campbellj","cluster_0"
-0.4452344958310986,-0.1958379969946416,27.0,25.0,25.0,0.0,0.0,1998.0,107.0,425.0,157.0,181.0,25.0,"J","Blackburn, S",,,,"Blackburn, S",,,"Wittgenstein, Wright, Rorty and minimalism","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"TRUTH",,"Univ N Carolina, Dept Philosophy, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA","Blackburn, S (reprint author), Univ N Carolina, Dept Philosophy, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA.",,,,,,"BLACKBURN S, 1990, SCHR WITT G, V19, P13; Blackburn S., 1993, ESSAYS QUASI REALISM; Blackburn S, 1984, SPREADING WORD; BOGHOSSIAN PA, 1990, PHILOS REV, V99, P157, DOI 10.2307/2185488 ; DIVERS J, 1995, ANALYSIS, V55, P37, DOI 10.2307/3328618 ; DIVERS J, 1995, PHILOS PAPERS, V24, P127; DREIER J, 1996, PHILOS STUD, V73, P1; Horwich P., 1990, TRUTH; JACKSON F, 1994, MIND, V103, P287, DOI 10.1093/mind/103.411.287 ; JAMES W, 1909, HUMANISM TRUTH; KRAUT R, 1990, MIND, V99, P157; Lovibond S., 1983, REALISM IMAGINATION; OLEARYHAWTHORNE J, 1996, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V74, P275, DOI 10.1080/00048409612347251 ; Putnam Hilary, 1992, RENEWING PHILOS; RAMSEY FP, 1931, F MATH; RHEES R, 1965, PHILOS REV, V74, P17, DOI 10.2307/2183528 ; RORTY R, 1995, PHILOS QUART, V45, P281, DOI 10.2307/2219651 ; RUMFITT I, 1995, RATIO, V8, P100, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9329.1995.tb00072.x ; SMITH M, 1994, ANALYSIS, V54, P1, DOI 10.2307/3328096 ; STOLJAR D, 1993, PHILOS STUD, V70, P81, DOI 10.1007/BF00989663 ; TAPPOLET C, IN PRESS MIXED IFERE; WITTGENSTEIN L, LECTURE ETHICS; WITTGENSTEIN L, REMARKS F MATH; Wittgenstein L., PHILOS INVESTIGATION; WITTGENSTEIN L, ZETTEL; WITTGENSTEIN L, CERTAINTY; WRIGHT C., 1992, TRUTH OBJECTIVITY","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/107.425.157",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","YT694","WOS:000071633700007",,,,,"2018-01-02",193.0,"blackburns blackburns boghossianpa diversj diversj dreierj horwichp jacksonf jamesw krautr lovibonds olearyhawthornej putnamhilary ramseyfp rheesr rortyr rumfitti smithm stoljard tappoletc wittgensteinl wittgensteinl wittgensteinl wittgensteinl wittgensteinl wrightc blackburns","cluster_0"
-0.024401818258625342,0.2363441232436796,14.0,25.0,26.0,0.0,0.0,1995.0,104.0,416.0,695.0,711.0,17.0,"J","BLACKBURN, S",,,,"BLACKBURN, S",,,"PRACTICAL TORTOISE RAISING","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"BLACKBURN, S (reprint author), UNIV N CAROLINA,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,CHAPEL HILL,NC 27599, USA.",,,,,,"Binmore K., 1994, GAME THEORY SOCIAL C; BUTLER J, 1953, 15 SERMONS; Carroll L., 1895, MIND, V4, P278, DOI [10.1093/mind/IV.14.278, DOI 10.1093/MIND/IV.14.278]; Dawes R. M., 1988, RATIONAL CHOICE UNCE; Gauthier D., 1986, MORALS AGREEMENT; Hampton Jean, 1995, HUME STUDIES, V21, P57; HARSANYI JC, 1977, RATIONAL BEHAVIOR BA; Kreps D., 1990, GAME THEORY EC MODEL; MILGRAM E, 1995, HUME STUDIES, V21, P75; POSTEMA J, 1995, LAW PHILOS, V14, P35; SAMUELSON P, 1947, F EC ANAL; Sen A., 1982, CHOICE WELFARE MEASU; Smith A., 1759, THEORY MORAL SENTIME; von Neumann J., 1944, THEORY GAMES EC BEHA","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/104.416.695",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","TB435","WOS:A1995TB43500002",,,,,"2018-01-02",194.0,"butlerj carrolll dawesrm gauthierd hamptonjean harsanyijc krepsd milgrame postemaj samuelsonp sena smitha vonneumannj binmorek","cluster_4"
-0.5124249176125739,0.04912640733082404,33.0,25.0,25.0,0.0,1.0,1993.0,102.0,405.0,53.0,79.0,27.0,"J","PETTIT, P; SMITH, M",,,,"PETTIT, P; SMITH, M",,,"PRACTICAL UNREASON","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"WILL; WEAKNESS",,"MONASH UNIV,CLAYTON,VIC 3168,AUSTRALIA","PETTIT, P (reprint author), AUSTRALIAN NATL UNIV,CANBERRA,ACT 2601,AUSTRALIA.",,,,,,"ARON R, 1968, MAIN CURRENTS SOCIOL, V1; BACHARACH M, 1991, ESSAYS F DECISION TH; BIGELOW J, 1990, AM PHILOS QUART, V27, P39; BIGELOW J, 1988, PAC PHILOS QUART, V69, P307; BIGELOW J, IN PRESS AUTONOMY IN; BRENNAN G, SYNTHESE; Charles D., 1992, REDUCTION EXPLANATIO; DANCY J, IN PRESS READING PAR; DAVIDSON D, 1980, ESSAYS ACTIONS EVENT; Flanagan O., 1990, IDENTITY CHARACTER M; Frankfurt H.G., 1988, IMPORTANCE WHAT WE C; Hurley S.L., 1989, NATURAL REASONS; HURSTHOUSE R, 1980, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, P81; JACKSON F, 1984, MIND, V93, P1; JACKSON F, 1985, AM PHILOS QUART, V22, P105; Johnston Mark, 1989, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V63, P139; KENNETT J, IN PRESS AUSTRALASIA; MACINTYRE A, 1990, IDENTITY CHARACTER M; MCDOWELL J, 1979, MONIST, V62, P331, DOI 10.5840/monist197962319 ; PETTIT P, 1990, PHILOS REV, V99, P565, DOI 10.2307/2185617 ; PETTIT P, 1987, MIND, V96, P74; PETTIT P, IN PRESS READING PAR; Pettit Philip, 1991, MIND, V100, P587; PETTIT P, 1991, ESSAYS F DECISION TH, P147; RORTY AO, 1980, ESSAYS ARISTOTLES ET; SARTRE JP, 1958, BEING AND NOTHINGNES; Schick Frederick, 1991, UNDERSTANDING ACTION; SMITH M, 1987, MIND, V96, P36; Smith M., 1992, REDUCTION EXPLANATIO; STOCKER M, 1979, J PHILOS, V76, P738, DOI 10.2307/2025856 ; URMSON JO, 1980, ESSAYS ARISTOTLES ET; WATSON G, 1977, PHILOS REV, V86, P316, DOI 10.2307/2183785 ; Watson G., 1982, FREE WILL","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/102.405.53",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","KK060","WOS:A1993KK06000003",,"gold",,,"2018-01-02",195.0,"bacharachm bigelowj bigelowj bigelowj brennang charlesd dancyj davidsond flanagano frankfurthg hurleysl hursthouser jacksonf jacksonf johnstonmark kennettj macintyrea mcdowellj pettitp pettitp pettitp pettitphilip pettitp rortyao sartrejp schickfrederick smithm smithm stockerm urmsonjo watsong watsong aronr","cluster_6"
-1.0110911460901726,-0.9497948827536506,35.0,25.0,25.0,0.0,1.0,1992.0,101.0,403.0,421.0,441.0,21.0,"J","TYE, M",,,,"TYE, M",,,"NATURALISM AND THE MENTAL","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"FUNCTIONALISM",,"UNIV LONDON KINGS COLL,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,LONDON WC2R 2LS,ENGLAND","TYE, M (reprint author), TEMPLE UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,HUMANITIES BLDG,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19122, USA.",,,,,,"ARMSTRONG DM, 1968, MATERIALIST THEORY M; Block N., 1980, READINGS PHILOS PSYC, V1 and 2; BLOCK N, TROUBLES FUNCTIONALI; Boyd R., 1980, READINGS PHILOS PSYC, V1; CARNAP R, 1932, ERKENNTNIS, P11; Churchland P. M., 1984, MATTER CONSCIOUSNESS; Dennett D. C., 1969, CONTENT CONSCIOUSNES; DRETSKE F, 1988, EXPLAINING BEHAVIOUR; FIELD H, MENTAL REPRESENTATIO; FODOR J, MAKING MIND MATTER M; FODOR J, THEORY CONTENT, V2; FODOR J, SEMANTICS WISCONSIN; FODOR J, THEORY CONTENT, V1; HARMAN G, 1986, REPRESENTATION KNOWL; HARMAN G., 1973, THOUGHT; Hempel C., 1970, ESSAYS HONOR E NAGEL; Kosslyn SM, 1980, IMAGE MIND; Kraus O., 1919, F BRENTANO KENNTNIS; Lewis D., 1972, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V50, P249, DOI 10.1080/00048407212341301; Lycan W., 1988, JUDGEMENT JUSTIFICAT; McGinn C., 1989, MENTAL CONTENT; NISBETT RE, 1977, PSYCHOL REV, V84, P231, DOI 10.1037//0033-295X.84.3.231; PUTNAM H, NATURE MENTAL STATES; RIPS L, 1975, J VERB LEARN VERB BE, V8, P240; RORTY R, 1970, J PHILOS, V67, P399, DOI 10.2307/2024002 ; ROSCH E, 1975, J EXP PSYCHOL GEN, V104, P192, DOI 10.1037//0096-3445.104.3.192; Rosch E., 1978, COGNITION CATEGORIZA; Rosch E., 1973, COGNITIVE DEV ACQUIS; Smith E. E, 1981, CONCEPTS CATEGORIES; SOBER E, 1985, SYNTHESE, V64, P165, DOI 10.1007/BF00486037 ; Stalnaker Robert C., 1984, INQUIRY; STICH S, 1992, MIND, V101, P243, DOI 10.1093/mind/101.402.243 ; TYE M, 1983, PHILOS STUD, V44, P161, DOI 10.1007/BF00354097 ; Tye M., 1991, IMAGERY DEBATE; UNGERLEIDER LG, 1982, ANAL VISUAL BEHAVIOU","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/101.403.421",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","JG315","WOS:A1992JG31500001",,,,,"2018-01-02",196.0,"blockn blockn boydr carnapr churchlandpm dennettdc dretskef fieldh fodorj fodorj fodorj fodorj harmang harmang hempelc kosslynsm krauso lewisd lycanw mcginnc nisbettre putnamh ripsl rortyr rosche rosche rosche smithee sobere stalnakerrobertc stichs tyem tyem ungerleiderlg armstrongdm","cluster_0"
-0.38373645994863487,0.14060117649899265,22.0,25.0,26.0,0.0,2.0,1988.0,97.0,387.0,415.0,439.0,25.0,"J","WILLIAMS, M",,,,"WILLIAMS, M",,,"EPISTEMOLOGICAL REALISM AND THE BASIS OF SCEPTICISM","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"WILLIAMS, M (reprint author), NORTHWESTERN UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,BRENTANO HALL,EVANSTON,IL 60208, USA.",,,,,,"Austin J. L., 1961, PHILOS PAPERS; AYER AJ, 1956, PROBLEM KNOWLEDGE, P75; CAVELL S, 1979, CLAIM REASON WITTGEN, P217; CLARKE T, 1972, J PHILOS; Fann K. T., 1969, S JL AUSTIN; FOGELIN R, 1985, HUMES SKEPTICISM TRE, P46; GOODMAN N, 1978, WAYS WORLDMAKING, pCH1; KENNY A, 1981, DESCARTES PHILOS LET, P87; LEEDS S, 1978, ERKENNTNIS; MCGINN C, 1979, J PHILOS, P115; NAGEL T, 1986, VIEW FROM NOWHERE, pCH5; Quine W. V., 1969, ONTOLOGICAL RELATIVI; Rorty Richard, 1986, TRUTH INTERPRETATION; Selby-Bigge L. A., 1975, ENQUIRY HUMAN UNDERS; STRAWSON PF, 1985, SKEPTICISM NATURALIS, pCH1; STROUD, 1984, SIGNIFICANCE PHILOS; STROUD B, 1984, J PHILOS, P550; WILLIAMS B, 1978, DESCARTES PROJECT PU, pCH2; WILLIAMS M, 1986, PHILOS TOPICS; WILLIAMS M, 1977, GROUNDLESS BELIEF, pCH4; Wittgenstein Ludwig, 1969, CERTAINTY; 1985, P BRIT ACADEMY, P429","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","P5492","WOS:A1988P549200006",,,,,"2018-01-02",197.0,"ayeraj cavells clarket fannkt fogelinr goodmann kennya leedss mcginnc nagelt quinewv rortyrichard selbybiggela strawsonpf stroud stroudb williamsb williamsm williamsm wittgensteinludwig austinjl","cluster_6"
-0.15237582798606142,0.4559012425973918,6.0,25.0,25.0,0.0,0.0,1986.0,95.0,378.0,198.0,209.0,12.0,"J","RICHARDS, N",,,,"RICHARDS, N",,,"LUCK AND DESERT","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"RICHARDS, N (reprint author), UNIV ALABAMA,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,UNIVERSITY,AL 35486, USA.",,,,,,"ANDRE J, 1983, ANALYSIS; BAYLES M, 1982, LAW PHILOS; BRANDT R, 1969, PHILOS REV, P353; Hume David, ENQUIRY PRINCIPLES M; NAGEL T, 1982, FREE WILL, P176; WILLIAMS B, 1981, MORAL LUCK, P28","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","C1663","WOS:A1986C166300003",,,,,"2018-01-02",198.0,"baylesm brandtr humedavid nagelt williamsb andrej","cluster_6"
-0.658793946992098,-0.20602997873376885,9.0,25.0,25.0,0.0,1.0,1984.0,93.0,369.0,1.0,18.0,18.0,"J","JACKSON, F",,,,"JACKSON, F",,,"WEAKNESS OF WILL","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"JACKSON, F (reprint author), MONASH UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,CLAYTON,VIC 3168,AUSTRALIA.",,,,,,"DAVIDSON D, 1980, ESSAYS ACTIONS EVENT; Hume David, 1739, TREATISE HUMAN NATUR; Jeffrey Richard., 1965, LOGIC DECISION; LEWIS D, 1981, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V59, P5, DOI 10.1080/00048408112340011 ; LOCKE D, 1974, AM PHILOS QUART, V11, P169; Nagel T., 1970, POSSIBILITY ALTRUISM; PEARS D, 1982, PHILOSOPHIA, V11, P33, DOI 10.1007/BF02378804 ; Skyrms B., 1980, CAUSAL NECESSITY; WATSON G, 1977, PHILOS REV, V86, P316, DOI 10.2307/2183785","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","RZ479","WOS:A1984RZ47900001",,,,,"2018-01-02",199.0,"humedavid jeffreyrichard lewisd locked nagelt pearsd skyrmsb watsong davidsond","cluster_3"
-0.11030060410883095,0.149024901256671,7.0,25.0,25.0,0.0,0.0,1981.0,90.0,359.0,367.0,385.0,19.0,"J","DANCY, J",,,,"DANCY, J",,,"ON MORAL PROPERTIES","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"DANCY, J (reprint author), UNIV KEELE,KEELE ST5 5BG,STAFFORDSHIRE,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"BLACKBURN S, 1971, MORALITY MORAL REASO, P106; HARE RM, FREEDOM REASON; KOVESI J, MORAL NOTIONS; ROSS D, F ETHICS; ROSS WD, RIGHT GOOD; SINGER M, GENERALISATION ETHIC; SWINBURNE RG, 1976, PHILOSOPHY JAN, P8","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","LX072","WOS:A1981LX07200003",,,,,"2018-01-02",200.0,"harerm kovesij rossd rosswd singerm swinburnerg blackburns","cluster_6"
-0.00444448541196114,0.16779986233625518,7.0,25.0,25.0,0.0,1.0,1975.0,84.0,336.0,481.0,499.0,19.0,"J","RAZ, J",,,,"RAZ, J",,,"REASONS FOR ACTION, DECISIONS AND NORMS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"BALLIOL COLL,OXFORD,ENGLAND",,,,,,,"CHISHOLM, 1974, PRACTICAL REASON; GAUTHIER DP, 1963, PRACTICAL REASONING, P160; HODGSON, 1967, CONSEQUENCES UTILITA, P32; MEILAND, 1970, NATURE INTENTION, P55; OLDENQUIST A, 1967, ENCYCLOPEDIA PHILOSO, V2, P98; RAZ J, 1972, ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V46, P96; WRIGHT GHV, 1963, NORM ACTION, pCH5","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","AU034","WOS:A1975AU03400001",,,,,"2018-01-02",201.0,"gauthierdp hodgson meiland oldenquista razj wrightghv chisholm","cluster_4"
0.017327337891252736,0.02267718384993577,7.0,25.0,25.0,0.0,1.0,1960.0,69.0,273.0,31.0,40.0,10.0,"J","MACKAY, DM",,,,"MACKAY, DM",,,"ON THE LOGICAL INDETERMINACY OF A FREE CHOICE","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"FRANK P, 1958, 12 ATT C INT FIL, P5; MACKAY DM, 1957, IMPACT SCI SOC, V8, P86; MACKAY DM, 1957, LISTENER 0516; MACKAY DM, 1957, LISTENER 0509; POPPER KR, 1950, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V1, P173; Popper K., 1950, BRIT J PHILOSOPHY SC, V1, P117; WORMELL CP, 1958, MIND, V67, P267","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","CHA01","WOS:A1960CHA0100003",,,,,"2018-01-02",202.0,"mackaydm mackaydm mackaydm popperkr popperk wormellcp frankp","cluster_4"
-0.14824975604437732,-0.10708742731875955,25.0,24.0,24.0,0.0,5.0,2012.0,121.0,484.0,873.0,901.0,29.0,"J","Barnes, E",,,,"Barnes, Elizabeth",,,"Emergence and Fundamentality","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"In this paper, I argue for a new way of characterizing ontological emergence. I appeal to recent discussions in meta-ontology regarding fundamentality and dependence, and show how emergence can be simply and straightforwardly characterized using these notions. I then argue that many of the standard problems for emergence do not apply to this account: given a clearly specified meta-ontological background, emergence becomes much easier to explicate. If my arguments are successful, they show both a helpful way of thinking about emergence and the potential utility of discussions in meta-ontology when applied to first-order metaphysics.","Univ Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England","Barnes, E (reprint author), Univ Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England.","e.j.barnes@leeds.ac.uk",,,,,"Beckerman A., 1992, EMERGENCE REDUCTION; Bueno O, 2009, NEW WAVES PHILOS, P1, DOI 10.1057/9780230245198; Callender Craig, 2001, WHY BE FUNDAMENTALIS; Cameron RP, 2008, PHILOS STUD, V140, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11098-008-9223-3; Cameron RP, 2010, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V88, P401, DOI 10.1080/00048400903213763; Clayton Philip, 2006, REEMERGENCE EMERGENC; Ekman Paul, 2001, PHILOS IMPRINT, V1, P1; Gillett C., 2001, PHYS ITS DISCONTENTS; Hazlett A., 2010, NEW WAVES METAPHYSIC; Mele A., 1993, MENTAL CAUSATION; Heil J., 2003, ONTOLOGICAL POINT VI; Kim J, 1999, PHILOS STUD, V95, P3, DOI 10.1023/A:1004563122154 ; Langton R, 1998, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V58, P333, DOI 10.2307/2653512 ; Marras A, 2006, SYNTHESE, V151, P561, DOI 10.1007/s11229-006-9026-z; Maudlin T., 2007, METAPHYSICS PHYS; Merricks Trenton, 2003, OBJECTS PERSONS; O'Connor T, 2005, NOUS, V39, P658, DOI 10.1111/j.0029-4624.2005.00543.x ; Schaffer J, 2003, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V66, P125, DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00246.x ; Schaffer Jonathan, 2003, PHILOS STUD, V37, P498; Schaffer J, 2010, MIND, V119, P341, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzq033; Schaffer J, 2010, PHILOS REV, V119, P31, DOI 10.1215/00318108-2009-025; van Inwagen P., 1990, MAT BEINGS; Williams JRG, 2010, MIND, V119, P103, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzp137; Wilson Jessica MS, METAPHYSICAL E UNPUB; Wilson Jessica, 2005, NOUS, V29, P426","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzt001",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","147QM","WOS:000319182100001",,,,,"2018-01-02",204.0,"buenoo callendercraig cameronrp cameronrp claytonphilip ekmanpaul gillettc hazletta melea heilj kimj langtonr marrasa maudlint merrickstrenton oconnort schafferj schafferjonathan schafferj schafferj vaninwagenp williamsjrg wilsonjessicams wilsonjessica beckermana","cluster_3"
-1.4797755010801528,-1.4243636989652495,107.0,24.0,24.0,0.0,0.0,2004.0,113.0,452.0,609.0,681.0,73.0,"J","Oliver, A; Smiley, T",,,,"Oliver, A; Smiley, T",,,"Multigrade predicates","MIND",,,"English","Review",,,,,,,"LOGIC","The history of the idea of predicate is the history of its emancipation. The lesson of this paper is that there are two more steps to take. The first is to recognize that predicates need not have. a fixed degree, the second that they can combine with plural terms. We begin by articulating the notion of a multigrade predicate: one that takes variably many arguments. We counter objections to the very idea posed by Peirce, Dummett's Frege, and Strawson. We show that the arguments of a multigrade predicate must be grouped into places, with perhaps several arguments occupying positions at a place. Variability may relate to places or positions. Russell's multiple judgement predicate turns out to be just one example of a family-'is necessarily true of', 'is said of', 'is instantiated by' and so on-of predicates with variably many places. Our main concern, however, is lists. Any adequate account of lists must include plural as well as singular terms. On one account; lists are mere strings of separate arguments, which occupy variably many positions within a place of a multigrade predicate. A quite different account takes the list itself to be a compound plural term. We compare these rival conceptions, and reach some surprising conclusions. As a coda, we deploy the conceptual apparatus developed in the paper to assess Morton's pioneer system of multigrade logic.","Univ Cambridge, Fac Philosophy, Cambridge CB3 9DA, England; Univ Cambridge Clare Coll, Cambridge CB2 1TL, England","Oliver, A (reprint author), Univ Cambridge, Fac Philosophy, Cambridge CB3 9DA, England.","ado10@cam.ac.uk; tjs1002@cam.ac.uk",,,,,"Armstrong D. M., 1978, UNIVERSALS SCI REALI, VII; Barwise J., 1993, LANGUAGE 1 ORDER LOG; Bennett J.F, 1988, EVENTS THEIR NAMES; BOROWSKI EJ, 1976, ANALYSIS, V36, P96, DOI 10.2307/3327101 ; Burchfield R., 1996, NEW FOWLERS MODERN E; Chomsky Noam, 1963, HDB MATH PSYCHOL, VII, P269, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00034-1; Church A., 1941, CALCULI LAMBDA CONVE; Comrie B., 1985, LANGUAGE TYPOLOGY SY, P309; Corbett G. G., 2000, NUMBER; DALRYMPLE M, 1995, LINGUIST INQ, V26, P531; Davidson D., 1967, ESSAYS ACTIONS EVENT, P105; Davidson D, 1985, ESSAYS DAVIDSON ACTI, P230; Dik Simon, 1968, COORDINATION ITS IMP; Dowty David R., 1981, INTRO MONTAGUE SEMAN; Dummett M., 1981, INTERPRETATION FREGE; Dummett Michael, 1973, FREGE PHILOS LANGUAG; Faris J. A., 1964, QUANTIFICATION THEOR; Fisch M., 1982, WRITINGS CS PEIRCE, V1; Forbes G., 1994, MODERN LOGIC; Fowler H. K., 1926, DICT MODERN ENGLISH; Frankland E, 1866, LECT NOTES CHEM STUD; FREGE G., 1979, POSTHUMOUS WRITINGS, P203; Frege G., 1884, FDN ARITHMETIC; FREGE G, 1893, GRUNDGESETZE ARITHME, V1, P137; Geach P., 1957, MENTAL ACTS; Geach P., 1962, REFERENCE GENERALITY; GEACH P, 1965, LOGIC MATTERS, P108; Geach P., 1975, MIND LANG, P139; Geach Peter Thomas, 1980, REFERENCE GENERALITY; Geach P. T., 1979, TRUTH LOVE IMMORTALI; Cowers E., 1987, COMPLETE PLAIN WORDS; Grandy Richard E, 1976, SYNTHESE, V32, P395; Grandy Richard E, 1977, ADV LOGIC APPL; GRIFFIN N, 1985, PHILOS STUD, V47, P213, DOI 10.1007/BF00354148 ; GROVER C, 1994, ENCY LANGUAGE LINGUI, V2, P762; HARDY GH, 1925, COURSE PURE MATH; HENDRY H., 1969, LOGICAL WAY DOING TH, P279; HORNE T, 1986, DIVERSIONS PURLEY, V1; HORNSBY J, 1979, PAPERS LANGUAGE LOGI, P88; Huddleston R. D., 2002, CAMBRIDGE GRAMMAR EN; HUDSON Richard, 1984, WORD GRAMMAR; JACOBSON P, 1999, CONCISE ENCY GRAMMAT, P93; Jennings R.E, 1994, GENEALOGY DISJUNCTIO; Jespersen Otto, 1924, PHILOS GRAMMAR; Jevons W. Stanley, 1870, ELEMENTARY LESSONS L; Kay P., 1989, P 15 ANN M BERK LING, P181; KENNY Anthony, 1963, ACTION EMOTION WILL; LAKOFF G, 1966, MOD STUD ENGL, P113; Langer S. K., 1937, INTRO SYMBOLIC LOGIC; Lasersohn Peter, 1995, PLURALITY CONJUNCTIO; Leonard Henry S., 1940, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V5, P45; Lewis D.K., 1991, PARTS CLASSES; LYONS J, 1968, INTRO THEORETICAL LI; MASON C, 1974, ENGLISH GRAMMAR; MASSEY GJ, 1976, AM PHILOS QUART, V13, P89; Mates B., 1965, ELEMENTARY LOGIC; Matthews P H, 1981, SYNTAX; McCawley J., 1981, EVERYTHING LINGUISTS; Mellor D. H., 1995, FACTS CAUSATION; Michael I., 1970, ENGLISH GRAMMATICAL; MORTON A, 1975, NOUS, V9, P309, DOI 10.2307/2214634 ; MUNDY B, 1989, J PHILOS LOGIC, V18, P115, DOI 10.1007/BF00293444 ; Oliver A, 2001, PHILOS QUART, V51, P289; PEACOCKE C, 1978, J PHILOS LOGIC, V7, P473; Peirce Charles Sanders, 1976, NEW ELEMENTS MATH, V4, P313; PEIRCE CS, 1933, COLLECTED PAPERS CS, V3, P250; PEIRCE C., 1931, COLLECTED PAPERS CS, V1, p[112, 142]; Peirce Charles Sanders, 1933, COLLECTED PAPERS CS, V3, P288; PEIRCE CS, 1986, WRITINGS CS PEIRCE, V4, P391; PERCIVAL WK, 1976, SYNTAX SEMANTICS, V7, P229; POSTAL PM, 1964, CONSTITUENT STRUCTUR; PRIOR AN, 1971, OJBECTS THOUGHT; PUTNAM H, 1982, HIST MATH, V9, P290, DOI 10.1016/0315-0860(82)90123-9 ; Quine W., 1974, METHODS LOGIC; QUINE WV, 1956, J PHILOS, V53, P177, DOI 10.2307/2022451 ; Quine Willard Van Orman, 1960, WORD OBJECT; QUINE WV, 1981, THEORIES THINGS, P113; Quine W.V.O., 1960, SELECTED LOGICAL PAP, P227; Quirk Randolph, 1985, COMPREHENSIVE GRAMMA; RADFORD Andrew, 1988, TRANSFORMATIONAL GRA; Rescher Nicholas, 1967, LOGIC DECISION ACTIO; Russell B., 1903, PRINCIPLES MATH; Russell Bertrand, 1992, THEORY KNOWLEDGE 191; RUSSELL B, 1972, RUSSELLS LOGICAL ATO, P31; Russell B., 1910, PHILOS ESSAYS, P147; Russell Bertrand, 1907, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V7, P28; Russell Bertrand, 1911, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V11, P108; Russell Bertrand, 1967, PROBLEMS PHILOS; RUSSELL CA, 1971, HIST VALENCY; Sainsbury M, 1991, LOGICAL FORMS; Schwarzschild R., 1996, PLURALITIES; SMILEY T, 2004, STUDIES PHILOS LOGIC, P131; Strawson P., 1974, SUBJECT PREDICATE LO; STRAWSON PF, 1979, MONIST, V62, P143, DOI 10.5840/monist197962216 ; Sylvester J.J., 1878, AM J MATH, V1, P64; Sylvester J. J., 1878, NATURE, V17, P284; TAYLOR B, 1992, LOGIQUE ANAL, P139; TESNIER L, 1959, ELEMENTS SYNTAX STRU; Thomason R. H., 1973, LINGUIST INQ, V4, P195; van Inwagen P., 1990, MAT BEINGS; Wallace J, 1972, NOUS, V6, P85; Whitehead Alfred, 1910, PRINCIPIA MATH, V1; Whitehead A.N., 1925, PRINCIPIA MATH, V1; WIERZBICKA A, 1980, LINGUA MENTALIS SEMA, P223; WIGGINS D, 1986, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V86, P273; Wittgenstein L., 1922, TRACTATUS LOGICO PHI; YO BU, 1998, ERKENNTNIS, V49, P93","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/113.452.609",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","864OH","WOS:000224642300001",,,,,"2018-01-02",205.0,"barwisej bennettjf borowskiej burchfieldr chomskynoam churcha comrieb corbettgg dalrymplem davidsond davidsond diksimon dowtydavidr dummettm dummettmichael farisja fischm forbesg fowlerhk franklande fregeg fregeg fregeg geachp geachp geachp geachp geachpeterthomas geachpt cowerse grandyricharde grandyricharde griffinn groverc hardygh hendryh hornet hornsbyj huddlestonrd hudsonrichard jacobsonp jenningsre jespersenotto jevonswstanley kayp kennyanthony lakoffg langersk lasersohnpeter leonardhenrys lewisdk lyonsj masonc masseygj matesb matthewsph mccawleyj mellordh michaeli mortona mundyb olivera peacockec peircecharlessanders peircecs peircec peircecharlessanders peircecs percivalwk postalpm prioran putnamh quinew quinewv quinewillardvanorman quinewv quinewvo quirkrandolph radfordandrew reschernicholas russellb russellbertrand russellb russellb russellbertrand russellbertrand russellbertrand russellca sainsburym schwarzschildr smileyt strawsonp strawsonpf sylvesterjj sylvesterjj taylorb tesnierl thomasonrh vaninwagenp wallacej whiteheadalfred whiteheadan wierzbickaa wigginsd wittgensteinl yobu armstrongdm","cluster_0"
-0.564278109509836,-0.23271897869265787,53.0,24.0,24.0,0.0,1.0,2004.0,113.0,451.0,437.0,476.0,40.0,"J","Millican, P",,,,"Millican, P",,,"The one fatal flaw in Anselm's argument","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT","Anselm's Ontological Argument fails, but not for any of the various reasons commonly adduced. In particular, its failure has nothing to do with violating deep Kantian principles by treating, exists' as a predicate or making reference to 'Meinongian' entities. Its one fatal flaw, so far from being metaphysically deep, is in fact logically shallow, deriving from a subtle scope ambiguity in Anselm's key phrase. If we avoid this ambiguity, and the indeterminacy of reference to which it gives rise, then his argument is blocked even if his supposed Meinongian extravagances are permitted. Moreover it is blocked in a way which is straightforward and compelling (by contrast with the Kantian objections), and which generalizes easily to other versions of the Ontological Argument. A significant moral follows. Fear of Anselm's argument has been hugely influential in motivating ontological fastidiousness and widespread reluctance to countenance talk of potentially non-existing entities. But if this paper is correct, then the Ontological Argument cannot properly provide any such motivation. Some of the most influential contributions to ontology, from Kant to Russell and beyond, rest on a mistake.","Univ Leeds, Sch Philosophy, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England","Millican, P (reprint author), Univ Leeds, Sch Philosophy, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England.","p.j.r.millican@leeds.ac.uk",,,,,"ALSTON WP, 1960, PHILOS REV, V69, P452, DOI 10.2307/2183480 ; ANSCOMBE GEM, 1993, PHILOS QUART, V43, P500, DOI 10.2307/2219990 ; Anscombe G. E. M., 1967, INTRO WITTGENSTEINS; AQUINAS T, 1259, SUMMA GENTILES BOOK; Barnes J., 1972, ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT; Barth Karl, 1931, FIDES QUAERENS INTEL; Berkeley George, 1962, PRINCIPLES HUMAN KNO; BROAD CD, 1953, RELIG PIHILOS PHYS R, P175; Campbell R., 1976, BELIEF UNDERSTANDING; CARGILE J, 1975, PHILOSOPHY, V50, P69, DOI 10.1017/S0031819100059106 ; Castaneda H.-N., 1974, PHILOSOPHIA, V4, P3; Charlesworth M. J., 1965, ST ANSELMS PROSLOGIO; COTTINGHAM J, 1984, PIHILOS WRITINGS DES, V2; DAVIES B., 1982, INTRO PHILOS RELIG; Davies B., 1992, THOUGHT T AQUINAS; DEVINE PE, 1975, AM PHILOS QUART, V12, P255; Flew Antony, 1966, GOD PHILOS; Frege G., 1884, GRUNDLAGEN ARITHMETI; GASSENDI P, 1641, 5 SET OBJECTIONS; GEACH PT, 1958, J PHILOS ASS, P5; Gibbon E., 1776, HIST DECLINE FALL RO, V1-6; Griffin Nicholas, 1991, RUSSELLS IDEALIST AP; HENRY DP, 1967, LOGIC SAINT ANSELEM; Hick John, 1967, MANY FACED ARGUMENT; Hume D., 1739, TREATISE HUMAN NATUR; Jacquette D., 1996, MEINONGIAN LOGIC SEM; Jacquette D., 2000, GRAZER PHILOS STUDIE, V58-59, P151; Kant I., 1965, CRITIQUE PURE REASON; Kneale WC, 1936, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V15, P154; Kripke S., 1972, SEMANTICS NATURAL LA, P253, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_9; Leibniz Gottfried Wilhelm, 1714, MONADOLOGY; Lewis D. K., 1970, NOUS, V4, P175; Mackie John Leslie, 1982, MIRACLE THEISM; MALCOLM N, 1960, PHILOS REV, V69, P41, DOI 10.2307/2182266 ; McGinn C., 2000, LOGICAL PROPERTIES I; Millican Peter, 1989, COGITO, V3, P193; Moore G. E., 1936, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, VXV, P175; ONeill J., 1998, MARKET ETHICS KNOWLE; Oppy G., 1995, ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT; Parsons T., 1980, NONEXISTENT OBJECTS; Passmore J., 1985, RECENT PHILOS; PLANTINGA A, 1974, NATURE NECCESSITY; Plantinga A., 1965, ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT; PRIOR AN, 1976, LOGIC ETHICS, P56; RAPAPORT WJ, 1978, NOUS, V12, P153, DOI 10.2307/2214690 ; Routley Richard, 1979, EXPLORING MEINONGS J; Russell B., 1919, INTRO MATH PHILOS; Russel B, 1905, MIND, V14, P479, DOI DOI 10.1093/MIND/XIV.4.479; Ryle G., 1935, MIND, V44, P137; SIMONS PM, 1988, Z SEMIOTIK, V10, P399; STOLZ A, 1933, CATH M, V2, P1; SWINBURNE R, 1977, COHERENCE THEISM; 1976, ANSELM CANTERBURY, V1, P1","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/113.451.437",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","838CE","WOS:000222689900001",,,,,"2018-01-02",206.0,"anscombegem anscombegem aquinast barnesj barthkarl berkeleygeorge broadcd campbellr cargilej castanedahn charlesworthmj cottinghamj daviesb daviesb devinepe flewantony fregeg gassendip geachpt gibbone griffinnicholas henrydp hickjohn humed jacquetted jacquetted kanti knealewc kripkes leibnizgottfriedwilhelm lewisdk mackiejohnleslie malcolmn mcginnc millicanpeter moorege oneillj oppyg parsonst passmorej plantingaa plantingaa prioran rapaportwj routleyrichard russellb russelb ryleg simonspm stolza swinburner alstonwp","cluster_0"
-0.33015899173796853,-0.3029085933635389,36.0,24.0,25.0,0.0,0.0,2002.0,111.0,443.0,551.0,582.0,32.0,"J","Tennant, N",,,,"Tennant, N",,,"Deflationism and the Godel Phenomena (Semantical argument, first-order formal arithmetic)","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"TRUTH","Any (1-)consistent and sufficiently strong system of first-order formal arithmetic fails to decide some independent Godel sentence. We examine consistent first-order extensions of such systems. Our purpose is to discover what is minimally required by way of such extension in order to be able to prove the Godel sentence in a non-trivial fashion. The extended methods of formal proof must capture the essentials of the so-called 'semantical argument' for the truth of the Godel sentence. We are concerned to show that the deflationist has at his disposal such extended methods--methods which make no use or mention of a truth-predicate. This consideration leads us to reassess arguments recently advanced--one by Shapiro and another by Ketland--against the deflationist's account of truth. Their main point of agreement is this: they both adduce the Godel phenomena as motivating a 'thick' notion of truth, rather than the deflationist's 'thin' notion. But the so-called 'semantical argument', which appears to involve a 'thick' notion of truth, does not really have to be semantical at all. It is, rather, a reflective argument. And the reflections upon a system that are contained therein are deflationarily licit, expressible without explicit use or mention of a truth-predicate. Thus it would appear that this anti-deflationist objection fails to establish that there has to be more to truth than mere conformity to the disquotational T-schema.","Ohio State Univ, Dept Philosophy, Columbus, OH 43210 USA","Tennant, N (reprint author), Ohio State Univ, Dept Philosophy, Columbus, OH 43210 USA.",,,,,,"Anderson A., 1964, MINDS MACHINES; Barwise J, 1977, HDB MATH LOGIC; Buss S.R., 1986, BOUNDED ARITHMETIC; Cook Stephen A., 1975, P 7 ANN ACM S THEOR, P83; DETLEFSEN M, 1986, HILBERTS PROGRAM; Dummett Michael, 1978, TRUTH OTHER ENIGMAS; Dunn J. M., 1990, TRUTH CONSEQUENCES E; FEFERMAN S, 1991, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V56, P1, DOI 10.2307/2274902 ; Feferman Solomon, 1962, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V27, P259, DOI DOI 10.2307/2964649; Feferman Solomon, 1998, LIGHT LOGIC; Field H, 1999, J PHILOS, V96, P533, DOI 10.2307/2564613 ; Field H., 1986, FACT SCI MORALITY, P55; FRIEDMAN H, 1987, ANN PURE APPL LOGIC, V33, P1, DOI 10.1016/0168-0072(87)90073-X ; GROVER D, 1990, TRUTH CONSEQUENCES E, P1; GROVER DL, 1975, PHILOS STUD, V27, P73, DOI 10.1007/BF01209340 ; HALBACH V, 1996, AXIOMATISCHE WAHRHEI; Halbach V., 1999, STUDIA LOGICA, V62, P353; HALDANE J, 1993, RELIATY REPRESENTATI; HILBERT D, 1939, GRUNDLAGEN MATH, V1, P283; HOFSTADTER DR, 1979, GODEL ESCHER BACH; Horwich P., 1990, TRUTH; JEROSLOW RG, 1973, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V38, P359, DOI 10.2307/2273028 ; Ketland J, 1999, MIND, V108, P69, DOI 10.1093/mind/108.429.69 ; Lob M.H, 1955, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V20, P115, DOI 10.2307/2266895; LUCAS JR, 1964, MIND MACH, P43; LUCAS JR, 1961, PHILOSOPHY, V36; MACDONALD G, 1986, FACT SCI MORALITY ES; Nagel Ernest, 1958, GODELS PROOF; Peacocke C., 1993, REALITY REPRESENTATI, P165; Penrose R., 1989, EMPERORS NEW MIND; Shapiro S, 1998, J PHILOS, V95, P493, DOI 10.2307/2564719 ; Smorynsky Craig, 1977, HDB MATH LOGIC, P821; Tarski A, 1956, LOGIC SEMANTICS META, P152; Tarski A., 1953, UNDECIDABLE THEORIES; WOODGER JH, 1956, LOGIC SEMANTICS META; Wright C., 1986, REALISM MEANING TRUT","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/111.443.551",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","575MK","WOS:000176949900002",,,,,"2018-01-02",207.0,"barwisej busssr cookstephena detlefsenm dummettmichael dunnjm fefermans fefermansolomon fefermansolomon fieldh fieldh friedmanh groverd groverdl halbachv halbachv haldanej hilbertd hofstadterdr horwichp jeroslowrg ketlandj lobmh lucasjr lucasjr macdonaldg nagelernest peacockec penroser shapiros smorynskycraig tarskia tarskia woodgerjh wrightc andersona","cluster_0"
-0.1532434168222236,0.7488581137091661,16.0,24.0,24.0,0.0,0.0,1995.0,104.0,413.0,63.0,77.0,15.0,"J","FELDMAN, F",,,,"FELDMAN, F",,,"DESERT - RECONSIDERATION OF SOME RECEIVED WISDOM","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"FELDMAN, F (reprint author), UNIV MASSACHUSETTS,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,AMHERST,MA 01003, USA.",,,,,,"Barry B., 1965, POLITICAL ARGUMENT; Cottingham J., 1992, ENCY ETHICS; FEINBERG J, 1963, JUSTICE; HOSPERS J, 1961, HUMAN CONDUCT; KLEINIG J, 1971, AM PHILOS QUART, V8, P71; Mill J. S., 1957, UTILITARIANISM; Miller David, 1976, SOCIAL JUSTICE; NEW C, 1992, ANALYSIS, V52, P35, DOI 10.2307/3328880 ; Rachels James, 1978, JUSTICE EC DISTRIBUT; RAWLS J, 1971, THEORY JSUTICE; Rescher N., 1966, DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE; Sadurski W., 1985, GIVING DESERT ITS DU; SHER G, 1987, DESERT; Sidgwick H, 1962, METHODS ETHICS; SLOTE MA, 1973, PHILOS PUBLIC AFF, V2, P323; SMILANSKY S, 1994, ANALYSIS, V54, P50, DOI 10.2307/3328104","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/104.413.63",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","QH555","WOS:A1995QH55500002",,,,,"2018-01-02",208.0,"cottinghamj feinbergj hospersj kleinigj milljs millerdavid newc rachelsjames rawlsj reschern sadurskiw sherg sidgwickh slotema smilanskys barryb","cluster_4"
-0.8089077640049338,-0.7122876297279604,42.0,24.0,24.0,0.0,0.0,1993.0,102.0,407.0,455.0,481.0,27.0,"J","SHAPIRO, S",,,,"SHAPIRO, S",,,"MODALITY AND ONTOLOGY","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"LOGIC",,,"SHAPIRO, S (reprint author), OHIO STATE UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,NEWARK CAMPUS,UNIV DR,NEWARK,OH 43055, USA.",,,,,,"Benacerraf P., 1973, J PHILOS, V70, P661; Benacerraf P., 1983, PHILOS MATH; Bernays P., 1935, PHILOS MATH SELECTED, P258; Blackburn S, 1984, SPREADING WORD; BOOLOS G, 1985, PHILOS REV, V94, P327, DOI 10.2307/2185003 ; BOOLOS G, 1984, J PHILOS, V81, P430, DOI 10.2307/2026308 ; BURGESS JP, 1984, J PHILOS LOGIC, V13, P379; CARTWRIGHT N, 1983, HOW LAWS PHYSICS LIE; CHIHARA C., 1990, CONSTRUCTIBILITY MAT; CHIHARA C, 1992, WITTGENSTEIN S KIRCH; Chihara C. S., 1973, ONTOLOGY VICIOUS CIR; CORCORAN J, 1974, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V39, P625, DOI 10.2307/2272846 ; Dummett M., 1978, TRUTH OTHER ENIGMAS, P215; Dummett M. A. E., 1977, ELEMENTS INTUITIONIS; FIELD H, 1984, PHILOS REV, V93, P509, DOI 10.2307/2184826 ; FIELD H, 1991, PHILOS STUD, V62, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF00646253 ; FIELD H, 1985, J PHILOS, V82, P239, DOI 10.2307/2026490 ; FIELD H, 1980, SCI WITHOUT NUMBERS; GODEL K, 1944, PHILOS MATH, P447; Hellman Geoffrey, 1989, MATH NUMBERS; LANDMAN F, 1989, LINGUIST PHILOS, V12, P723, DOI 10.1007/BF00632603 ; LANDMAN F, 1989, LINGUIST PHILOS, V12, P559, DOI 10.1007/BF00627774 ; Lewis D., 1986, PLURALITY WORLDS; Maddy P., 1990, REALISM MATH; NOLT JE, 1978, THESIS OHIO STATE U; PUTNAM H, 1967, J PHILOS, V64, P5, DOI 10.2307/2024603 ; Putnam H., 1983, PHILOS MATH SELECTED, P295; [Anonymous], 1971, PHILOS LOGIC; Quine W., 1986, PHILOS LOGIC; QUINE W. V., 1981, THEORIES THINGS; Quine W. V., 1969, ONTOLOGICAL RELATIVI; RESNIK MD, 1982, NOUS, V16, P95, DOI 10.2307/2215419 ; RESNIK MD, 1981, NOUS, V15, P529, DOI 10.2307/2214851 ; RESNIK MD, 1988, J PHILOS, V85, P75, DOI 10.2307/2026993 ; SHAPIRO S, 1989, SYNTHESE, V79, P13, DOI 10.1007/BF00873255 ; SHAPIRO S, 1983, PHILOS SCI, V50, P523, DOI 10.1086/289138 ; SHAPIRO S, 1987, J PHILOS LOGIC, V16, P309, DOI 10.1007/BF00152934 ; SHAPIRO S, 1983, J PHILOS, V80, P521, DOI 10.2307/2026112 ; SHAPIRO S, 1991, F FOUNDATIONALISM CA; Shapiro S., 1989, PHILOS TOPICS, V17, P145; Shoenfield J, 1967, MATH LOGIC; WILSON M, 1981, PHILOS STUD, V39, P409, DOI 10.1007/BF00360346","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/102.407.455",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","LQ102","WOS:A1993LQ10200003",,,,,"2018-01-02",209.0,"benacerrafp bernaysp blackburns boolosg boolosg burgessjp cartwrightn chiharac chiharac chiharacs corcoranj dummettm dummettmae fieldh fieldh fieldh fieldh godelk hellmangeoffrey landmanf landmanf lewisd maddyp noltje putnamh putnamh quinew quinewv quinewv resnikmd resnikmd resnikmd shapiros shapiros shapiros shapiros shapiros shapiros shoenfieldj wilsonm benacerrafp","cluster_0"
-1.225552303240864,-0.45699778506288535,113.0,24.0,24.0,0.0,0.0,1988.0,97.0,386.0,153.0,188.0,36.0,"J","SOSA, E",,,,"SOSA, E",,,"BEYOND SCEPTICISM, TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"SOSA, E (reprint author), BROWN UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,PROVIDENCE,RI 02912, USA.",,,,,,"ACKERMAN R, 1972, BELIEF KNOWLEDGE; ALMEDER R, 1983, CANADIAN J PHILOS, P115; ALSTON WP, 1985, MONIST, V68, P57, DOI 10.5840/monist198568116 ; ALSTON WP, 1986, PHILOS PHENOMENOLOGI, P1; ALSTON WP, 1986, PHILOS TOPICS, P179; ALSTON WP, 1983, SYNTHESE, P73; ALSTON WP, 1976, J PHILOS, P165; ALSTON WP, 1985, HIST PHILOS Q, P435; ANNIS DB, 1978, AM PHILOS Q, P213; Audi Robert, 1988, BELIEF JUSTIFICATION; AUDI R, 1983, MONIST, P592; AUDI R, 1983, SYNTHESE, P119; BLACKBURN S, 1984, P BRIT ACADEMY, P167; BOGEN J, 1985, SYNTHESE, P195; BONJOUR L., 1985, STRUCTURE EMPIRICAL; BRUECKNER AL, 1984, ANALYSIS, P103; CASTANEDA HN, 1980, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, P193; Chisholm Roderick M., 1986, RM CHISHOLM, P3; Chisholm Roderick, 1988, THEORY KNOWLEDGE; CHISHOLM RM, 1980, MIDWEST STUDIES PHIL, P543; CHISHOLM RM, 1982, F KNOWING; CHISHOLM RM, 1981, DIALECTICA, P341; COHEN S, 1986, J PHILOS, P574; DANCE J, 1984, ANALYSIS, P121; Dancy J., 1985, CONT EPISTEMOLOGY; Davidson D, 1982, GRAZER PHILOS STUDIE, P471; Davidson D., 1983, KANT ODER HEGEL, P423; Dretske Fred, 1983, KNOWLEDGE FLOW INFOR; DRETSKE F, 1970, ANALYSIS; DRETSKE F., 1971, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V49, P1; DRETSKE FI, 1970, J PHILOS, V67, P1007, DOI 10.2307/2024710 ; FELDMAN R, 1985, MONIST, P159; FELDMAN R, 1985, PHILOS STUDIES, P15; FIRTH R, 1964, J PHILOS, P545; FIRTH R, 1981, P ADDRESSES AM PHILO, P5; FOLEY R., 1987, THEORY EPISTEMIC RAT; FORBES G, PHILOS Q, P43; FRENCH PA, 1980, MIDWEST STUDIES PHIL, V5; GARRETT BJ, 1983, ANALYSIS, P181; GARRETT BJ, 1984, ANALYSIS, P194; GINET C, 1985, MONIST, P175; GOLDMAN A, 1986, EPISTEMOLOGY COGNITI; GOLDMAN AH, 1979, METAPHILOSOPHY, P227; GORDON D, 1984, ANALYSIS, P30; GRECO J, 1987, PHILOS PAPERS, P23; HAACK S, 1983, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, P143; Harman G., 1986, CHANGE VIEW; HARMAN G., 1973, THOUGHT; HEIL J, 1983, J PHILOS, P752; HILPINEN R, 1983, SYNTHESE, P165; JOHNSEN B, 1986, PHILOS PHENOMENOLOGI, P483; Johnson O., 1978, SKEPTICISM COGNITIVI; KAPLAN M, 1985, J PHILOS, P350; KLEIN P., 1981, CERTAINTY REFUTATION; Kornblith H., 1985, NATURALIZING EPISTEM; KORNBLITH H, 1980, J PHILOS, P597; KVANVIG J, 1984, ERKENNTNIS, P175; LEHRER K, 1983, SYNTHESE, P191; LEHRER K, 1986, PHILOS TOPICS, P5; LEHRER K., 1974, KNOWLEDGE; Lehrer Keith, 1981, K LEHRER, P3; LEMOS N, 1982, PHILOS STUDIES, P229; LUPERFOY S, 1984, AUSTRALASIAN J PHILO; Luper- Foy S., 1987, POSSIBILITY KNOWLEDG; MARGOLIS J, 1986, PRAGMATISM F; MARTIN R, 1983, ANALYSIS, P28; Moser Paul K., 1985, EMPIRICAL JUSTIFICAT; MOSER PK, 1986, PHILOS STUDIES, P91; NOZICK R, 1981, PHILOS EXPLANATIONS; PAPPAS G, 1978, ESSAYS KNOWLEDGE JUS; PAPPAS GS, 1978, ESSAYS ON KNOWLEDGE, P309; PENDLEBURY M, 1986, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, P91; PLANTINGA A, 1986, NOUS, P3; PLANTINGA A, 1988, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES; Pollock J., 1987, CONT THEORIES KNOWLE; Pollock J. L., 1974, KNOWLEDGE JUSTIFICAT; Putnam H., 1981, REASON TRUTH HIST; PUTNAM H, 1983, REALISM REASON, P229; Quine Willard V., 1969, ONTOLOGICAL RELATIVI, P68; RESCHER N, 1979, SCEPTICISM CRITICAL; Rescher N., 1979, COGNITIVE SYSTEMATIZ; RESCHER N., 1977, METHODOLOGICAL PRAGM; RESCHER N, 1974, J PHILOS, P695; RESCHER N., 1973, COHERENCE THEORY TRU; SCHMITT F, 1983, SYNTHESE, P209; SELLARS W., 1979, JUSTIFICATION KNOWLE, P169; SELLARS WS, 1973, J PHILOS, P612; SELLERS WF, 1975, ACTION KNOWLEDGE REA, P332; SHATZ D, 1983, SYNTHESE, P97; SHOPE RK, 1984, J PHILOS, P29; Shope R. K., 1983, ANAL KNOWING; SLOTE M, 1970, REASON SCEPTICISM; SOSA E, 1983, SYNTHESE, P49; SOSA E, 1988, EPISTEMOLOGY STATE A; SOSA E, 1988, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES; SOSA E, 1985, SYNTHESE, P3; SOSA E, 1986, PHILOS PAPERS, P75; SOSA E, 1985, MONIST, P224; SOSA E, 1986, TRUTH INTERPRETATION; SOSA E, 1988, SYNTHESE; SOSA E, 1986, PHILOS TOPICS, P67; Strawson P. F., 1985, SKEPTICISM NATURALIS; STROUD B., 1984, SIGNIFICANCE PHILOS; Swain M., 1981, REASONS KNOWLEDGE; UNGER P, 1974, IGNORANCE CASE SKEPT; VANCLEVE J, 1979, PHILOS REV, P55; VANCLEVE J, 1984, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, P555; VANCLEVE J, 1985, MONIST, P90; WILLIAMS M, 1978, J PHILOS, P249; Williams M., 1977, GROUNDLESS BELIEF; Wittgenstein Ludwig, 1969, CERTAINTY; WRIGHT C, 1983, ANALYSIS, P134; YOURGRAU P, 1983, SYNTHESE, P175","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","N6896","WOS:A1988N689600001",,,,,"2018-01-02",210.0,"almederr alstonwp alstonwp alstonwp alstonwp alstonwp alstonwp annisdb audirobert audir audir blackburns bogenj bonjourl brueckneral castanedahn chisholmroderickm chisholmroderick chisholmrm chisholmrm chisholmrm cohens dancej dancyj davidsond davidsond dretskefred dretskef dretskef dretskefi feldmanr feldmanr firthr firthr foleyr forbesg frenchpa garrettbj garrettbj ginetc goldmana goldmanah gordond grecoj haacks harmang harmang heilj hilpinenr johnsenb johnsono kaplanm kleinp kornblithh kornblithh kvanvigj lehrerk lehrerk lehrerk lehrerkeith lemosn luperfoys luperfoys margolisj martinr moserpaulk moserpk nozickr pappasg pappasgs pendleburym plantingaa plantingaa pollockj pollockjl putnamh putnamh quinewillardv reschern reschern reschern reschern reschern schmittf sellarsw sellarsws sellerswf shatzd shoperk shoperk slotem sosae sosae sosae sosae sosae sosae sosae sosae sosae strawsonpf stroudb swainm ungerp vanclevej vanclevej vanclevej williamsm williamsm wittgensteinludwig wrightc yourgraup ackermanr","cluster_0"
-0.06923295563673373,0.02499498793852685,22.0,23.0,23.0,1.0,7.0,2012.0,121.0,481.0,97.0,130.0,34.0,"J","Wiggins, D",,,,"Wiggins, David",,,"Practical Knowledge: Knowing How To and Knowing That","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"Ryle's account of practical knowing is much controverted. The paper seeks to place present disputations in a larger context and draw attention to the connection between Ryle's preoccupations and Aristotle's account of practical reason, practical intelligence, and the way in which human beings enter into the way of being and acting that Aristotle denominates ethos. Considering matters in this framework, the author finds inconclusive the arguments that Stanley and Williamson offer for seeing knowing how to as a special case of knowing that. The paper then explores certain implications of the author's position for the philosophy of mind and the grammatical analysis of constructions involving 'know how to'. It ends with a neo-Rylean remark about Aristotelian nous.","Univ Oxford, New Coll, Oxford OX1 2JD, England","Wiggins, D (reprint author), Univ Oxford, New Coll, Oxford OX1 2JD, England.",,,,,,"Aristotle, 1925, NICOMACHEAN ETHICS; Bengson John, KNOWING ESS IN PRESS; BYRON GG, 1991, BYRON COMPLETE MISCE; Evora Fatima, 2004, LOGICA ONTOLOGIA ENS; Glock Hans-Johann, 2009, WITTGENSTEIN ANAL PH; Hornsby Jennifer, 1980, ACTIONS; Hornsby Jennifer, 2005, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V78, P107; Hume David, 1902, ENQUIRY PRINCIPLES M; Lovi-bond S., 2002, ETHICAL FORMATION; PEIRCE Charles S, 1931, COLLECTED PAPERS CS; Rorty A. O., 1980, ESSAYS ARISTOTLES ET; Rumfitt I, 2003, J PHILOS, V100, P158, DOI 10.5840/jphil2003100319 ; Ryle G., 1949, CONCEPT MIND; Ryle G., 1945, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V46, P1, DOI DOI 10.1093/ARISTOTELIAN/46.1.1; Stanley J, 2001, J PHILOS, V98, P411, DOI 10.2307/2678403 ; VONCLAUSEWITZ C, 1991, KRIEGE; Leibniz von Gottfried Wilhelm, 1981, NEW ESSAYS HUMAN UND, P44; Leibniz von Gottfried Wilhelm, 1923, SAMTLICHE SCHRIFTEN, V6; White Alan R, 1982, NATURE KNOWLEDGE; Wiggins D., 2006, ETHICS 12 LECT PHILO; Wiggins D., 2002, NEEDS VALUES TRUTH E; Wiggins D., 1975, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V76, P29","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzs026",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","007OD","WOS:000308897100004",,,,,"2018-01-02",211.0,"bengsonjohn byrongg evorafatima glockhansjohann hornsbyjennifer hornsbyjennifer humedavid lovibonds peircecharless rortyao rumfitti ryleg ryleg stanleyj vonclausewitzc leibnizvongottfriedwilhelm leibnizvongottfriedwilhelm whitealanr wigginsd wigginsd wigginsd aristotle","cluster_6"
-0.37312997055349106,-0.3160342083641358,69.0,23.0,23.0,0.0,0.0,2007.0,116.0,463.0,603.0,631.0,29.0,"J","Schellenberg, S",,,,"Schellenberg, Susanna",,,"Action and self-location in perception","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"EXPERIENCE","I offer an explanation of how subjects are able to perceive the intrinsic spatial properties of objects, given that subjects always perceive from a particular location. The argument proceeds in two steps. First, I argue that a conception of space is necessary to perceive the intrinsic spatial properties of objects. This conception of space is spelled out by showing that perceiving intrinsic properties requires perceiving objects as the kind of things that are perceivable from other locations. Second, I show that having such a conception of space presupposes that a subject represent her location in relation to perceived objects. More precisely the thesis is that a subject represents her location as the location from which she both perceives objects and would act in relation to objects were she to act. So I argue that perception depends on the capacity to know what it would be to act in relation to objects.","Australian Natl Univ, RSSS, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia","Schellenberg, S (reprint author), Australian Natl Univ, RSSS, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.","susanna.schellenberg@anu.edu.au",,,,,"Anscombe G. E. M., 1957, INTENTION; ARISTOTLE, 1984, ANIMA, P641; BALDIN T, 2004, INTRO M PONTY WORLD, P1; BALDIN T, 1998, PHILOS EXPLORATIONS, P107; BALDIN T, 2003, AGENCY SELF AWARENES, P188; BARNES J., 1984, COMPLETE WORKS ARIST; BERMUDEZ J., 1998, BODY SELF; Bermudez J. L., 2000, PHILOS EXPLORATIONS, P63; Block N, 2005, J PHILOS, V102, P259, DOI 10.5840/jphil2005102524 ; BREWER B, 1992, MIND, V101, P17, DOI 10.1093/mind/101.401.17 ; BROADIE S, 1987, BIOL LOGIQUE, P389; Burge T., 1986, PHILOS REV, V45, P3; Campbell J., 1994, PAST SPACE SELF; Carman T., 2004, CAMBRIDGE COMPANION; CARR D, 1979, MIND, V88, P394; Cassam Quassim, 1997, SELF AND WORLD; CLARK A, 2001, PHILOS REV, V110, P445; Davies Martin, 2000, MIND SOC, V2, P87; Eilan N., 2003, AGENCY SELF AWARENES; EVANS G, 1985, COLLECT PAPERS, P248; EVANS G, 1982, VARIETTIES REFERENCE; Foster J., 1985, ESSAYS BERKELEY; FREKSA C, 1998, SPATIAL COGNITION; Gibson J. J., 1979, ECOLOGICAL APPROACH; GINET C., 1975, KNOWLEDGE PERCEPTION; Goodale MA, 1998, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V22, P161, DOI 10.1016/S0149-7634(97)00007-9 ; Grush R, 2004, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V27, P377; Grush R., 2000, BRAIN MIND, V1, P59, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1010039705798; GRUSH R, IN PRESS J HIST PHIL; Gupta A, 1999, LANGUAGE, LOGIC, AND CONCEPTS, P15; HARTFIELD G, 1990, NATURAL NORMATIVE TH; Hiraki K, 1998, ADAPT BEHAV, V6, P371, DOI 10.1177/105971239800600302; HORNSBY J, 2004, SUPPLEMENT P ARISTOT, V79, P107; Hornsby J., 2000, PHILOS EXPLORATIONS, V1, P6; HURLEY S, IN PRESS EXTENDED MI; Hurley S.L., 1998, CONSCIOUSNESS ACTION; Iachini T, 2006, COGNITIVE PROCESSING, V7, P126, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10339-006-0100-8; JACKENDOFF R, 1999, LANGUAGES LOGIC CONC; Kelly SD, 2001, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V62, P601, DOI 10.2307/2653538; Kelly S. D., 2004, CAMBRIDGE COMPANION, P74; Klatzky R. L., 1998, Spatial Cognition. An Interdisciplinary Approach to Representing and Processing Spatial Knowledge, P1; Maguire EA, 1998, SCIENCE, V280, P921, DOI 10.1126/science.280.5365.921; Marr D., 1982, VISION COMPUTATIONAL; Matthen Mohan, 2005, SEEING DOING KNOWING; Matthen M, 2006, MIND, V115, P1160, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzl1160; MCDOWELL J, 1994, PHILOS QUART, V44, P190, DOI 10.2307/2219740 ; MENARY R, IN PRESS EXTENDED MI; Merleau-Ponty Maurice, 1962, PHENOMENOLOGY PERCEP; Mumford S, 1999, PHILOS QUART, V49, P215, DOI 10.1111/1467-9213.00138 ; Mumford S, 1998, DISPOSITIONS; Noe Alva, 2004, ACTION PERCEPTION; NOE A, IN PRESS PHILOS TOPI; OHEARY A, 2004, MODERN MORAL PHILOS; PAILLARD J, 1991, BRAIN SPACE, P163; Peacocke C., 1999, BEING KNOWN; Peacocke C., 1985, ESSAYS BERKELEY, P19; Peacocke Ch., 1983, SENSE AND CONTENT; PELLEGRIN P, 1990, BIOL LOGIQUE; PIETERSMA H, 1990, CONCEPT MIND; Shapiro L. A., 2004, THE MIND INCARNATE; Stanley J, 2001, J PHILOS, V98, P411, DOI 10.2307/2678403 ; STRAWSON P, 1959, INDIVIDUALS ESSAY DE; STRAWSON PF, 1966, BOUNDS SENSE ESSAYS; Taylor Charles, 1989, MERLEAU PONTY CRITIC, P1; TAYLORS C, 1964, EXPLANATION BEHAV; Thompson E, 2001, TRENDS COGN SCI, V5, P418, DOI 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01750-2 ; Thompson E., 2007, MIND LIFE BIOL PHENO; Thompson Michael, 2004, MODERN MORAL PHILOS, P47; Williams B, 1973, PROBLEMS SELF, P26","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzm603",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","205FB","WOS:000249098300005",,,,,"2018-01-02",212.0,"aristotle baldint baldint baldint barnesj bermudezj bermudezjl blockn brewerb broadies burget campbellj carmant carrd cassamquassim clarka daviesmartin eilann evansg evansg fosterj freksac gibsonjj ginetc goodalema grushr grushr grushr guptaa hartfieldg hirakik hornsbyj hornsbyj hurleys hurleysl iachinit jackendoffr kellysd kellysd klatzkyrl maguireea marrd matthenmohan matthenm mcdowellj menaryr merleaupontymaurice mumfords mumfords noealva noea ohearya paillardj peacockec peacockec peacockech pellegrinp pietersmah shapirola stanleyj strawsonp strawsonpf taylorcharles taylorsc thompsone thompsone thompsonmichael williamsb anscombegem","cluster_0"
-0.9402340945590875,-0.6335065324268941,42.0,23.0,23.0,0.0,0.0,2003.0,112.0,445.0,1.0,33.0,33.0,"J","Barker, S",,,,"Barker, S",,,"Truth and conventional implicature","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"EVEN IF","Are all instances of the T-schema assertable? I argue that they are not. The reason is the presence of conventional implicature in a language. Conventional implicature is meant to be a component of the rule-based content that a sentence can have, but it makes no contribution to the sentence's truth- conditions. One might think that a conventional implicature is like a force operator. But it is not, since it can enter into the scope of logical operators. It follows that the semantic content of a sentence is not given simply by its truth-conditional content. So not all instances of the T-schema are assertable in the relevant sense. Consequently, there is a strong case to be made against truth-conditional semantics of the disquotational variety and deflationism about truth.","Univ Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England","Barker, S (reprint author), Univ Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England.",,,,,,"Bach K, 1999, LINGUIST PHILOS, V22, P327, DOI 10.1023/A:1005466020243 ; Barker SJ, 2000, ANALYSIS, V60, P268, DOI 10.1111/1467-8284.00239 ; BARKER SJ, 1995, PHILOS STUD, V78, P185; BARKER SJ, IN PRESS RENEWING ME; BENNETT J, 1982, LINGUIST PHILOS, V5, P403, DOI 10.1007/BF00351461 ; BLACKBURN S, 1988, ETHICS, V98, P501, DOI 10.1086/292968 ; Blackburn S, 1984, SPREADING WORD; BLAKEMORE D, 1987, SEMANTIC COSNTRAINTS; BOUVERESSE J, 1981, MEANING UNDERSTANDIN; Brandom R., 1994, MAKING IT EXPLICIT; CARSTON R., 1988, MENTAL REPRESENTATIO; DAVIDSON D., 1984, INQUIRIES TRUTH INTE; Dummett M., 1981, FREGE PHILOS LANGUAG; FAUCONNIER G, 1975, LINGUIST INQ, V6, P353; FREGE G, 1956, MIND, V65, P289, DOI 10.1093/mind/65.1.289 ; Frege G., 1952, TRANSLATIONS PHILOS; Gazdar G., 1979, PRAGMATICS IMPLICATU; GRICE P., 1967, LOGIC CONVERSATION; GRICE P, 1971, PHILOS LANGUAGE, P54; GROVER DL, 1975, PHILOS STUD, V27, P73, DOI 10.1007/BF01209340 ; Horn L. R., 1989, NATURAL HIST NEGATIO; Horwich P., 1990, TRUTH; HUMBERSTONE L, 1991, PHILOS PHENOMENOLOGI, V51, P227; Jackson F., 1987, CONDITIONALS; Jackson F., 1999, SINGER HIS CRITICS, P18; Jamieson Dale, 1999, SINGER HIS CRITICS; Oh Choon-Kyu, 1979, SYNTAX SEMANTICS, P1; KAY P, 1990, LINGUIST PHILOS, V13, P59, DOI 10.1007/BF00630517 ; Kempson R, 1988, MENTAL REPRESENTATIO; Lycan W., 1984, LOGICAL FORM NATURAL; LYCAN WG, 1991, LINGUIST PHILOS, V14, P115, DOI 10.1007/BF00627400 ; LYCAN WG, 1993, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V7, P411; McDowell J., 1981, MEANING UNDERSTANDIN, P225; MUNITZ M, 1947, SEMANTICS PHILOS; OH CK, 1979, SYNTAX SEMANTICS, V11; Recanati Francois, 1989, MIND LANG, V4, P295, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-0017.1989.TB00258.X; Searle J. R., 1971, PHILOS LANGUAGE; SOAMES S, 1982, LINGUIST INQ, V13, P483; Sperber D., 1986, RELEVANCE; Stalnaker R. C., 1998, CONTEXT CONTENT; Strawson PF, 1950, MIND, V59, P320; WRIGHT C, 1992, TRUTH OBEJCTIVITY","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/112.445.1",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","641MA","WOS:000180747500001",,,,,"2018-01-02",213.0,"barkersj barkersj barkersj bennettj blackburns blackburns blakemored bouveressej brandomr carstonr davidsond dummettm fauconnierg fregeg fregeg gazdarg gricep gricep groverdl hornlr horwichp humberstonel jacksonf jacksonf jamiesondale ohchoonkyu kayp kempsonr lycanw lycanwg lycanwg mcdowellj munitzm ohck recanatifrancois searlejr soamess sperberd stalnakerrc strawsonpf wrightc bachk","cluster_0"
-0.20556174061166163,-0.20427548349536773,27.0,23.0,23.0,0.0,0.0,1999.0,108.0,429.0,1.0,22.0,22.0,"J","Halbach, V",,,,"Halbach, V",,,"Disquotationalism and infinite conjunctions","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"TRUTH",,"Univ Constance, Philos Fak, Fachfgruppe Philos, D-78457 Constance, Germany","Halbach, V (reprint author), Univ Constance, Philos Fak, Fachfgruppe Philos, D-78457 Constance, Germany.",,,,,,"Belnap N., 1993, REVISION THEORY TRUT; Cantini Andrea, 1996, LOGICAL FRAMEWORKS T; Craig William, 1958, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V23, P289; FEFERMAN S, 1991, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V56, P1, DOI 10.2307/2274902 ; FIELD H, 1994, MIND, V103, P247; Field H., 1972, J PHILOS, V69, P347; Field H., 1986, FACT SCI MORALITY, P55; FRIEDMAN H, 1987, ANN PURE APPL LOGIC, V33, P1, DOI 10.1016/0168-0072(87)90073-X ; Gupta A., 1993, PHILOS TOPICS, V21, P57, DOI DOI 10.5840/PHILTOPICS199321218; Halbach V, 1997, J PHILOS LOGIC, V26, P69, DOI 10.1023/A:1017977304199 ; HALBACH V, 1994, THESIS U MUNICH; HALBACH V, 1996, AXIOMATISCHE WAHRHEI; HALBACH V, IN PRESS STUDIA LOGI; HALBACH V, IN PRESS J INDIAN CO; Horwich P., 1990, TRUTH; Kaye R., 1991, MODELS PEANO ARITHME; KLEENE CS, 1952, MEM AM MATH SOC, V10, P27; KOTLARSKI H, 1981, CAN MATH BULL, V24, P283, DOI 10.4153/CMB-1981-045-3 ; Leeds S., 1978, ERKENNTNIS, V13, P111; MCGEE V, 1992, J PHILOS LOGIC, V21, P235; McGee V., 1991, TRUTH VAGUENESS PARA; MOSCHOVAKIS YN, 1974, ELEMENTARY INDUCTION; Quine W.V., 1990, PURSUIT TRUTH; Quine W. V., 1970, PHILOS LOGIC; SMITH S, 1984, THESIS YALE UNIV; Smorynsky Craig, 1977, HDB MATH LOGIC, P821; Tarski A, 1956, LOGIC SEMANTICS META, P152","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/108.429.1",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","162JL","WOS:000078342400001",,,,,"2018-01-02",214.0,"cantiniandrea craigwilliam fefermans fieldh fieldh fieldh friedmanh guptaa halbachv halbachv halbachv halbachv halbachv horwichp kayer kleenecs kotlarskih leedss mcgeev mcgeev moschovakisyn quinewv quinewv smiths smorynskycraig tarskia belnapn","cluster_0"
-0.17769744455196138,-0.19839291919317914,19.0,23.0,23.0,0.0,0.0,1998.0,107.0,426.0,305.0,347.0,43.0,"J","Burge, T",,,,"Burge, T",,,"Frege on knowing the foundation (Euclideanism, self-evidence, axiom)","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Philosophy, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA","Burge, T (reprint author), Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Philosophy, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA.",,,,,,"ANGELLELI I, 1967, FREGE KLEINE SCHRIFT; BURGE T, 1984, PHILOS REV, V93, P3, DOI 10.2307/2184411 ; BURGE T, 1992, MIND, V101, P633, DOI 10.1093/mind/101.404.633 ; Burge T., 1990, ANAL TRADITION; Dummett Michel, 1991, FREGE PHILOS MATH; Frege Gottlob, 1879, BEGRIFFSSCHRIFT, P1; Frege G., 1903, GRUNDGESETZE ARITHME, VII; FREGE G, 1884, FOUNDATIONS ARITHMET; GEACH P, 1966, FREGE TRANSLATION PH; HECK R, IN PRESS FREGE CAMBR; HERMES H, 1976, FREGE WISSENSCHAFTLI; HERMES H, 1969, FREGE NACHGELASSENE; KAAL H, 1980, FREGE PHILOS MATH CO; LEIBNIZ GW, 1765, NEW ESSAYS HUMAN UND; LONG P, 1979, FREGE POSTHUMOUS WRI; MCGUINNESS, 1984, FREGE COLLECTED PAPE; Stanley J, 1996, PAC PHILOS QUART, V77, P45; VANHEIJENOORT J, 1981, FREGE GODEL; Zermelo E., 1908, NEW PROOF POSSIBILIT","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/107.426.305",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","ZJ895","WOS:000073264500002",,,,,"2018-01-02",215.0,"burget burget burget dummettmichel fregegottlob fregeg fregeg geachp heckr hermesh hermesh kaalh leibnizgw longp mcguinness stanleyj vanheijenoortj zermeloe angellelii","cluster_0"
-0.20919876031673423,-0.22756241997013243,18.0,23.0,23.0,0.0,0.0,1997.0,106.0,422.0,279.0,303.0,25.0,"J","Rowlands, M",,,,"Rowlands, M",,,"Teleological semantics","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"Rowlands, M (reprint author), UNIV COLL CORK,CORK,IRELAND.",,,,,,"BOGDAN R, 1986, BELIEF; Dawkins R., 1982, EXTENDED PHENOTYPE G; Dennett D. C., 1987, INTENTIONAL STANCE; Dennett D. C., 1969, CONTENT CONSCIOUSNES; Dretske F, 1986, BELIEF FORM CONTENT, P17; Fodor J., 1990, THEORY CONTENT OTHER; Gibson J. J., 1979, ECOLOGICAL APPROACH; McGinn C., 1989, MENTAL CONTENT; MILLIKAN RG, 1986, PHILOS REV, V95, P47, DOI 10.2307/2185132 ; MILLIKAN RG, 1989, J PHILOS, V86, P281, DOI 10.2307/2027123 ; MILLIKAN RG, 1989, PHILOS SCI, V56, P288, DOI 10.1086/289488 ; Millikan R. G., 1984, LANGUAGE THOUGHT OTH; MILLIKAN RG, 1994, MEANING MIND FODOR H, P151; PAPINEAU D, 1984, PHILOS SCI, V51, P550, DOI 10.1086/289205 ; Papineau D., 1987, REALITY REPRESENTATI; REY G, 1994, MEANING MIND FODOR H; Sober E., 1984, NATURE SELECTION; STERELNY K, 1990, REPRESENTATIONAL THE","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/106.422.279",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","WR328","WOS:A1997WR32800004",,,,,"2018-01-02",216.0,"dawkinsr dennettdc dennettdc dretskef fodorj gibsonjj mcginnc millikanrg millikanrg millikanrg millikanrg millikanrg papineaud papineaud reyg sobere sterelnyk bogdanr","cluster_0"
-0.5403222171999362,0.0511855167808409,33.0,23.0,24.0,0.0,2.0,1996.0,105.0,417.0,119.0,137.0,19.0,"J","MORTON, A",,,,"MORTON, A",,,"FOLK PSYCHOLOGY IS NOT A PREDICTIVE DEVICE","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"MORTON, A (reprint author), UNIV BRISTOL,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,BRISTOL BS8 1TH,AVON,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"BICCIERI C, 1992, KNOWLEDGE BELIEF STR; BINMORE K, 1992, KNOWLEDGE BELIEF STR; BRATMAN M, 1992, PHILOS REV, V102, P327; Bratman M., INTENTION PLANS PRAC; Byrne R., 1988, MACHIAVELLIAN INTELL; DANIELSON P, 1991, CONTRACTARIANISM RAT; DAVIDSON D., 1984, INQUIRIES TRUTH INTE, V2001, P141; DAVIES M, 1995, FOLK PSYCHOLOGY THEO; DENNETT D, INTENTIONAL STANCE; GAUTHIER D, MORALS AGREEMENT; GIBBARD A, WISE CHOICES APT FEE; Goldman A. I., 1992, MIND LANG, V7, P104, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-0017.1992.TB00200.X; GORDON R, 1995, FOLK PSYCHOLOGY THEO; HAMMOND PJ, 1976, REV ECON STUD, V43, P159, DOI 10.2307/2296609 ; HARGREAVESHEAP S, THEORY CHOICE; HEAL J, FACT MEANING; HURLEY SL, 1994, ANALYSIS, V54, P65, DOI 10.2307/3328823 ; KAHNEMAN D, 1979, ECONOMETRICA, V47, P263, DOI 10.2307/1914185 ; KREPS D, GAME THEORY EC MODEL; MacIntyre Alasdair, AFTER VIRTUE; MCLENNEN E, RATIONALITY DYNAMIC; MORTON A, 1994, RATIO, V7, P14, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9329.1994.tb00150.x ; MORTON A, DISASTERS DILEMMAS; MORTON A, FRAMES MIND; NOZICK R, NATURE RATIONALITY; Rabinowicz W., 1992, KNOWLEDGE BELIEF STR; RAILTON P, 1986, PHILOS REV, V95, P163, DOI 10.2307/2185589 ; SHIN HS, 1994, THEOR DECIS, V37, P125, DOI 10.1007/BF01079208 ; SKYRMS B, 1992, KNOWLEDGE BELIEF STR; SKYRMS B, 1990, MBS9118 IRV RES UN M; SMITH H, 1991, CONTRACTARIANISM RAT; STALNAKER R, 1994, THEOR DECIS, V37, P49, DOI 10.1007/BF01079205 ; Vallentyne P., 1991, CONTRACTARIANISM RAT","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/105.417.119",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","TT053","WOS:A1996TT05300004",,,,,"2018-01-02",217.0,"binmorek bratmanm bratmanm byrner danielsonp davidsond daviesm dennettd gauthierd gibbarda goldmanai gordonr hammondpj hargreavesheaps healj hurleysl kahnemand krepsd macintyrealasdair mclennene mortona mortona mortona nozickr rabinowiczw railtonp shinhs skyrmsb skyrmsb smithh stalnakerr vallentynep biccieric","cluster_6"
-0.14452321759684414,0.028879703500634207,29.0,23.0,23.0,1.0,1.0,1993.0,102.0,407.0,413.0,428.0,16.0,"J","CURRIE, G",,,,"CURRIE, G",,,"INTERPRETATION AND OBJECTIVITY","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"TEXT",,,"CURRIE, G (reprint author), UNIV OTAGO,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,POB 56,DUNEDIN,NEW ZEALAND.",,,"Currie, Gregory/0000-0001-8364-997X",,,"BORGES JL, 1964, FICCIONES; BYRNE A, 1993, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V71, P24, DOI 10.1080/00048409312345022 ; CURRIE G, 1991, MIND, V100, P325; CURRIE G, 1991, PHILOS LITERATURE, V15, P212, DOI 10.1353/phl.1991.0016 ; DUHEM P, 1969, SAVE PHENOMENA; DWORKIN R., 1986, LAWS EMPIRE; DWORKIN R., 1985, MATTER PRINCIPLE; Fish Stanley, 1989, DOING WHAT COMES NAT; Hans-Georg Gadamer, 1975, TRUTH METHOD; Geertz Clifford, 1980, NEGARA THEATRE STATE; Goldman A. I., 1989, MIND LANG, V4, P161, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-0017.1989.TB00249.X; Goldman Alvin, 1992, P ADDRESSES AM PHILO, V66, P17; Gordon R., 1986, MIND LANG, V1, P158, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-0017.1986.TB00324.X; HOLLAND NN, 1986, CRIT INQUIRY, V12, P654, DOI 10.1086/448359 ; LEVINSON J, 1991, INTERPRETATION INTEN; Levinson Sanford, 1988, INTERPRETING LAW LIT; Lewis David Kellogg, 1989, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V90, P113; LLOYD GER, 1978, CLASSICAL QUART, V28, P202, DOI 10.1017/S0009838800037861 ; McDowell John, 1983, PLEASURE PREFERENCE; MUSGRAVE A, 1991, REASON; NEHAMAS A, 1986, J PHILOS, V83, P685, DOI 10.5840/jphil1986831118 ; NEHAMAS A, 1981, CRIT INQUIRY, P133; Nussbaum M., 1990, LOVES KNOWLEDGE; PUTNAM H, 1980, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V45, P464, DOI 10.2307/2273415; RICOEUR P, 1971, SOC RES, V38, P529; ROBINSON J, 1984, PHILOS REV, V94, P227; Slote M.A., 1971, J PHILOS, V68, P821; van Fraassen B., 1981, SCI IMAGE; VERMAZEN B, 1986, PAC PHILOS QUART, V67, P196","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/102.407.413",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","LQ102","WOS:A1993LQ10200001",,,,,"2018-01-02",218.0,"byrnea currieg currieg duhemp dworkinr dworkinr fishstanley hansgeorggadamer geertzclifford goldmanai goldmanalvin gordonr hollandnn levinsonj levinsonsanford lewisdavidkellogg lloydger mcdowelljohn musgravea nehamasa nehamasa nussbaumm putnamh ricoeurp robinsonj slotema vanfraassenb vermazenb borgesjl","cluster_0"
-0.06218603620665474,-0.07950235426390141,14.0,23.0,23.0,0.0,0.0,1992.0,101.0,404.0,633.0,650.0,18.0,"J","BURGE, T",,,,"BURGE, T",,,"FREGE ON KNOWING THE 3RD REALM","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"BURGE, T (reprint author), UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,LOS ANGELES,CA 90024, USA.",,,,,,"Benacerraf P., 1964, PHILOS MATH SELECTED; FREGE G, 1977, BEGRIFFSSCHRIFT; Frege G., 1983, NACHGELASSENE SCHRIF; Frege G, 1967, KLEINE SCHRIFTEN; Frege G., 1976, WISSENSCHAFTLICHER B; Frege G, 1984, COLLECTED PAPERS; Frege G., 1967, BASIC LAWS ARITHMETI; FREGE G, 1968, F ARITHMETIC; Frege Gottlob, 1980, PHILOS MATH CORRES; Frege Gottlob, 1979, POSTHUMOUS WRITINGS; FREGE G, 1962, GRUNDGSETZE ARITHMET; Ricketts T., 1986, FREGE SYNTHESIZED; Sluga H., 1980, G FREGE; Weiner J., 1990, FREGE IN PERSPECTIVE","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/101.404.633",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","JV063","WOS:A1992JV06300001",,,,,"2018-01-02",219.0,"fregeg fregeg fregeg fregeg fregeg fregeg fregeg fregegottlob fregegottlob fregeg rickettst slugah weinerj benacerrafp","cluster_0"
-0.8753809322775341,-0.2979838996858783,25.0,23.0,23.0,2.0,2.0,1991.0,100.0,400.0,507.0,524.0,18.0,"J","SHOEMAKER, S",,,,"SHOEMAKER, S",,,"QUALIA AND CONSCIOUSNESS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"SHOEMAKER, S (reprint author), CORNELL UNIV,SAGE SCH PHILOSOPHY,218 GOLDWIN SMITH HALL,ITHACA,NY 14853, USA.",,,,,,"Block N., 1990, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V4, P53, DOI [10.2307/2214187, DOI 10.2307/2214187]; BLOCK NJ, 1972, PHILOS REV, V81, P159, DOI 10.2307/2183991 ; BOGHOSSIAN PA, 1989, MIND, V98, P81; CLARK A, 1987, COGNITIVE SCI, V11, P139, DOI 10.1207/s15516709cog1102_1; Dennett Daniel C., 1988, CONSCIOUSNESS CONT S, P42; FODOR Jerry A., 1987, PSYCHOSEMANTICS PROB; Harman G., 1990, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V4, P31, DOI DOI 10.2307/2214186; HORGAN T, 1984, PHILOS QUART, V34, P147, DOI 10.2307/2219508 ; JACKSON F, 1982, PHILOS QUART, V32, P127, DOI 10.2307/2960077 ; LEWIS D, 1983, PHILOS PAPERS, V1, P130; Loar B., 1990, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V4, P81, DOI [DOI 10.2307/2214188, 10.2307/2214188]; MOORE GE, 1903, MIND, V7, P1; NAGEL T, 1974, PHILOS REV, V81, P127; NEMIROW L, 1980, PHILOS REV, V87, P473; Reid T., 1801, INQUIRY HUMAN MIND; SHOEMAKER S, 1990, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V50, P109, DOI 10.2307/2108035 ; SHOEMAKER S, 1982, J PHILOS, V79, P357, DOI 10.2307/2026213 ; SHOEMAKER S, 1981, PHILOS REV, V90, P581, DOI 10.2307/2184608 ; SHOEMAKER S, 1975, CRITICA, V7, P3; Shoemaker S., 1988, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V2, P183; Shoemaker S., 1984, IDENTITY CAUSE MIND; SHOEMAKER S, 1975, PHILOS STUD, V27, P291; SMART JJC, 1959, PHILOS REV, V68, P141, DOI 10.2307/2182164 ; TYE M, 1986, MIND, V95, P1; Wilkes Kathleen, 1988, REAL PEOPLE PERSONAL","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","GL556","WOS:A1991GL55600006",,,,,"2018-01-02",220.0,"blocknj boghossianpa clarka dennettdanielc fodorjerrya harmang horgant jacksonf lewisd loarb moorege nagelt nemirowl reidt shoemakers shoemakers shoemakers shoemakers shoemakers shoemakers shoemakers smartjjc tyem wilkeskathleen blockn","cluster_3"
-0.5955073012709535,-0.4529591268918997,17.0,23.0,23.0,2.0,3.0,1988.0,97.0,388.0,509.0,527.0,19.0,"J","BENNETT, J",,,,"BENNETT, J",,,"FAREWELL TO THE PHLOGISTON THEORY OF CONDITIONALS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"BENNETT, J (reprint author), SYRACUSE UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,SYRACUSE,NY 13244, USA.",,,,,,"ADAMS EW, 1975, LOGIC CONDITIONALS, pCH1; AYERS MR, 1965, MIND, P347; Blackburn S. W., 1986, MEANING INTERPRETATI, P201; DALE AJ, 1985, ANALYSIS, P179; DUDMAN VH, 1981, TENSE TIME ENGLISH; Dudman V. C., 1983, AUSTR J LINGUISTICS, V3, P25; ELLIS B, 1984, AUSTRALASIAN J PHILO, P50; ELLIS BD, 1979, RATIONAL BELIEF SYST, P59; FOWLER HW, 1931, KINGS ENGLISH, P163; Gibbard Allan, 1981, IFS, P211; GRICE HP, 1957, PHILOS REV, V66, P377, DOI 10.2307/2182440 ; JACKSON, 1987, CONDITIONALS; JACKSON F, 1979, PHILOS REV, P565; LEWIS D, 1973, COUNTERFACTUALS, P3; Ramsay F. P, 1978, FOUNDATIONS, P143; WARMBROD K, 1983, PACIFIC PHILOS Q, P249; ZANDVOORT RW, 1963, ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEA, P73","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","R0956","WOS:A1988R095600001",,,,,"2018-01-02",221.0,"ayersmr blackburnsw daleaj dudmanvh dudmanvc ellisb ellisbd fowlerhw gibbardallan gricehp jackson jacksonf lewisd ramsayfp warmbrodk zandvoortrw adamsew","cluster_3"
-0.1506029057290876,0.014492173122175454,16.0,23.0,23.0,0.0,2.0,1987.0,96.0,384.0,482.0,497.0,16.0,"J","MONTMARQUET, JA",,,,"MONTMARQUET, JA",,,"EPISTEMIC VIRTUE","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"MONTMARQUET, JA (reprint author), TENNESSEE STATE UNIV,3500 JOHN A MERRITT BLVD,NASHVILLE,TN 37203, USA.",,,,,,"AUDI R, 1983, J PHILOS, P398; BONJOUR L, 1985, STRUCTURE EMPIRICAL, pCH3; CLARKE M, 1986, PHILOS STUDIES, P39; CODE L, 1983, MONIST, P268; CODELLI L, 1984, POSITIF, P41; DENT NJ, 1985, MORAL PSYCHOL VIRTUE, pCH1; FOOT P, 1985, MIND, P196; FRENCH PA, 1980, MIDWEST STUDIES PHIL, V5; GOLDMAN AI, 1986, EPISTEMOLOGY COGNITI, P3; HEIL J, 1983, PHILOS STUDIES, P355; KVANVIG J, 1986, AM PHILOS Q, P189; SOSA E, 1985, MONIST, P226; 1986, ANALYSIS, P49; 1985, MONIST, P272; 1986, PHILOS TOPICS, P179; 1983, PHILOS REV, P34","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","K9527","WOS:A1987K952700003",,,,,"2018-01-02",222.0,"bonjourl clarkem codel codellil dentnj footp frenchpa goldmanai heilj kvanvigj sosae audir","cluster_0"
-0.08721230851421001,-0.08618188760599872,4.0,23.0,23.0,0.0,0.0,1987.0,96.0,381.0,62.0,70.0,9.0,"J","LOWE, EJ",,,,"LOWE, EJ",,,"THE INDEXICAL FALLACY IN MCTAGGART PROOF OF THE UNREALITY OF TIME","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"LOWE, EJ (reprint author), UNIV DURHAM,DURHAM DH1 3HN,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"Dummett Michael, 1978, TRUTH OTHER ENIGMAS; McTaggart J.M.E., 1927, NATURE EXISTENCE; Mellor D.H., 1981, REAL TIME; Sorabji R., 1983, TIME CREATION CONTIN","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","F9933","WOS:A1987F993300004",,,,,"2018-01-02",223.0,"mctaggartjme mellordh sorabjir dummettmichael","cluster_0"
-0.029635959533859883,-0.010229346414285374,19.0,23.0,23.0,0.0,0.0,1982.0,91.0,361.0,20.0,37.0,18.0,"J","RICHARDSON, RC",,,,"RICHARDSON, RC",,,"THE SCANDAL OF CARTESIAN INTERACTIONISM","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"RICHARDSON, RC (reprint author), UNIV CINCINNATI,CINCINNATI,OH 45221, USA.",,,,,,"ARMSTRONG DM, 1968, MATERIALIST THEORY M; Chisholm Roderick, 1976, PERSON OBJECT METAPH; DESCARTES R, NOTES AGAINST PROGRA; Descartes R., DISCOURSE METHOD; DESCARTES R, PRINCIPLES PHILOS; DESCARTES R, MEDITATIONS; DESCARTES R, 1931, PHILOS WORKS, V2; Descartes Rene, 1970, PHILOS LETT; DONAGAN A, 1978, DESCARTES CRITICAL I, P186; DONAGAN A, 1975, ACTION KNOWLEDGE REA; DUCASSE C, 1960, DIMENSIONS MIND, P88; KENNY A, 1968, DESCARTES STUDY PHIL; Kenny A., 1970, PHILOS LETT; MATTERN R, 1978, DESCARTES; Merleau-Ponty Maurice, 1962, PHENOMENOLOGY PERCEP; Ryle G., 1949, CONCEPT MIND; Williams B, 1978, DESCARTES PROJECT PU; WILSON M, 1978, DESCARTES CRITICAL I, P197; Wilson M.D., 1978, DESCARTES","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","MY218","WOS:A1982MY21800002",,,,,"2018-01-02",224.0,"chisholmroderick descartesr descartesr descartesr descartesr descartesr descartesrene donagana donagana ducassec kennya kennya matternr merleaupontymaurice ryleg williamsb wilsonm wilsonmd armstrongdm","cluster_6"
0.027047682835664978,0.02626924946491076,9.0,23.0,23.0,0.0,1.0,1966.0,75.0,297.0,1.0,24.0,24.0,"J","AGASSI, J",,,,"AGASSI, J",,,"SENSATIONALISM","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"UNIV HONG KONG,HONG KONG,HONG KONG",,,,,,,"BACON, GREAT INSTAURATION; BACON, NOVUM ORGANUM; Boyle, 1661, CERTAIN PHYSL ESSAYS; BOYLE, EXPERIMENTA OBSERVAT; EINSTEIN, PHILOSOPHY B RUSSELL; POPPER, LOGIC SCI DISCOVERY; RUSSELL, INQUIRY MEANING TRUT, P14; Ryle, 1949, CONCEPT MIND; SCHROEDINGER, NATURE GREEKS","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","ZE548","WOS:A1966ZE54800001",,,,,"2018-01-02",225.0,"bacon boyle boyle einstein popper russell ryle schroedinger bacon","cluster_0"
0.00633327854051461,0.1272132200489085,10.0,23.0,23.0,0.0,0.0,1961.0,70.0,280.0,471.0,490.0,20.0,"J","ARMSTRONG, KG",,,,"ARMSTRONG, KG",,,"THE RETRIBUTIVIST HITS BACK","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"BAIER K, 1955, ANALYSIS DEC; BENN CK, 1958, PHILOSOPHY OCT; FLEW AGN, 1954, PHILOSOPHY OCT; HART HLA, 1959, PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS, P5; KAUFMAN AS, 1959, ANALYSIS OCT; LEWIS CS, 1949, 20TH CENTURY; MABBOTT JD, 1939, MIND APR; MABBOTT JD, 1955, PHILOSOPHY JUL; QUINTON AM, 1954, ANALYSIS JUN; WHITELEY CH, 1956, PHILOSOPHY APR","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","CCP50","WOS:A1961CCP5000003",,,,,"2018-01-02",226.0,"bennck flewagn harthla kaufmanas lewiscs mabbottjd mabbottjd quintonam whiteleych baierk","cluster_4"
-0.10620836150399378,-0.16461378065336318,48.0,22.0,22.0,1.0,9.0,2012.0,121.0,483.0,753.0,771.0,19.0,"J","Clark, A",,,,"Clark, Andy",,,"Dreaming the Whole Cat: Generative Models, Predictive Processing, and the Enactivist Conception of Perceptual Experience","MIND",,,"English","Editorial Material",,,,,,,"REPRESENTATION; CONSCIOUSNESS; ALGORITHM; VISION; CORTEX; BRAIN; MIND","Does the material basis of conscious experience extend beyond the boundaries of the brain and central nervous system? In Clark 2009 I reviewed a number of 'enactivist' arguments for such a view and found none of them compelling. Ward (2012) rejects my analysis on the grounds that the enactivist deploys an essentially world-involving concept of experience that transforms the argumentative landscape in a way that makes the enactivist conclusion inescapable. I present an alternative (prediction-and-generative-model-based) account that neatly accommodates all the positive evidence that Ward cites on behalf of this enactivist conception, and that (I argue) makes richer and more satisfying contact with the full sweep of human experience.","Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, Midlothian, Scotland","Clark, A (reprint author), Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, Midlothian, Scotland.","andy.clark@ed.ac.uk",,,,,"BALLARD DH, 1991, ARTIF INTELL, V48, P57, DOI 10.1016/0004-3702(91)90080-4; Block N, 2005, J PHILOS, V102, P259, DOI 10.5840/jphil2005102524 ; Bubic A, 2010, FRONT HUM NEUROSCI, V4, P1, DOI DOI 10.3389/FNHUM.2010.00025/ABSTRACT.ACCESSED:2012; Clark A, 1998, ANALYSIS, V58, P7, DOI 10.1111/1467-8284.00096; Clark A, 1999, ADAPT BEHAV, V7, P5, DOI 10.1177/105971239900700101 ; Clark A., 2006, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V80, P43; Clark A., BEHAV BRAIN IN PRESS; Clark A., 1997, BEING THERE PUTTING; Clark A., 2008, SUPERSIZING MIND EMB; Clark A, 2009, MIND, V118, P963, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzp110; Corlett PR, 2009, PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, V206, P515, DOI 10.1007/s00213-009-1561-0; Cowan Jack D., 1994, ADV NEURAL INFORM PR, V6; DAYAN P, 1995, NEURAL COMPUT, V7, P889, DOI 10.1162/neco.1995.7.5.889 ; Eliasmith C, 2007, SYNTHESE, V159, P373, DOI 10.1007/s11229-007-9235-0; Feldman H., 2010, FRONT HUM NEUROSCI, V2, P215; Fletcher PC, 2009, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V10, P48, DOI 10.1038/nrn2536; Friston KJ, 2011, BIOL CYBERN, V104, P137, DOI 10.1007/s00422-011-0424-z; Friston KJ, 2010, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V11, P127, DOI 10.1038/nrn2787; Friston KJ, 2009, TRENDS COGN SCI, V13, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.005; Friston KJ, 2005, PHILOS T R SOC B, V360, P815, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2005.1622; Gendler Tamar Szabo, 2006, PERCEPTUAL EXPERIENC; GREGORY RL, 1980, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V290, P181, DOI 10.1098/rstb.1980.0090 ; Grush R, 2004, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V27, P377; Grush R, 1997, PHILOS PSYCHOL, V10, P5, DOI 10.1080/09515089708573201 ; HADDOCK A., 2008, DISJUNCTIVISM PERCEP; Hinton G., 2011, ICANN 11 INT C ART N; Hinton G., 1994, 1994 M AM STAT ASS T; HINTON GE, 1995, SCIENCE, V268, P1158, DOI 10.1126/science.7761831 ; Hinton GE, 2007, TRENDS COGN SCI, V11, P428, DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.004; Hinton GE, 2006, NEURAL COMPUT, V18, P1527, DOI 10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527; Hohwy J, 2008, COGNITION, V108, P687, DOI 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.010; Hohwy J, 2007, SYNTHESE, V159, P315, DOI 10.1007/s11229-007-9240-3; Huang YP, 2011, WIRES COGN SCI, V2, P580, DOI 10.1002/wcs.142; Koch C., 1994, LARGE SCALE NEURONAL; Millar A, 2007, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V74, P176, DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00008.x ; Mohan M., PERCEPTION IN PRESS; Neisser U., 1967, COGNITIVE PSYCHOL; Noe Alva, 2004, ACTION PERCEPTION; O'Regan JK, 2001, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V24, P939, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X01000115 ; Pettit Phillip, 1986, SUBJECT THOUGHT CONT; Pfeifer R, 2007, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V4850, P76; Putnam H, 1999, THREEFOLD CORD MIND; Rao RPN, 1999, NAT NEUROSCI, V2, P79, DOI 10.1038/4580 ; Rieke F., 1999, SPIKES EXPLORING NEU; Bach y Rita P., 2003, TRENDS COGN SCI, V7, P541; Sur M, 1999, J NEUROBIOL, V41, P33, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(199910)41:1<33::AID-NEU6>3.0.CO;2-1; Ward D, 2012, MIND, V121, P731, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzs095; Cisek P, 2007, PROG BRAIN RES, V165, P1","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzs106",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","139FV","WOS:000318568300007",,,,,"2018-01-02",227.0,"blockn bubica clarka clarka clarka clarka clarka clarka clarka corlettpr cowanjackd dayanp eliasmithc feldmanh fletcherpc fristonkj fristonkj fristonkj fristonkj gendlertamarszabo gregoryrl grushr grushr haddocka hintong hintong hintonge hintonge hintonge hohwyj hohwyj huangyp kochc millara mohanm neisseru noealva oreganjk pettitphillip pfeiferr putnamh raorpn riekef bachyritap surm wardd cisekp ballarddh","cluster_0"
0.024295325819312215,0.02724318343124859,5.0,22.0,22.0,0.0,3.0,2008.0,117.0,467.0,633.0,641.0,9.0,"J","Easwaran, K",,,,"Easwaran, Kenny",,,"Strong and weak expectations","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"Fine has shown that assigning any value to the Pasadena game is consistent with a certain standard set of axioms for decision theory. However, I suggest that it might be reasonable to believe that the value of an individual game is constrained by the long-run payout of repeated plays of the game. Although there is no value that repeated plays of the Pasadena game converges to in the standard strong sense, I show that there is a weaker sort of convergence it exhibits, and use this to define a notion of 'weak expectation' that can give values to the Pasadena game and many others, though not to all games that fail to have a strong expectation in the standard sense.","Univ So Calif, Sch Philosophy, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA","Easwaran, K (reprint author), Univ So Calif, Sch Philosophy, 3709 Trousdale Pkwy, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA.","easwaran@usc.edu",,,,,"Colyvan M, 2006, MIND, V115, P695, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzl695; Durrett R, 2005, PROBABILITY THEORY E; Feller W., 1968, INTRO PROBABILITY TH; Fine TL, 2008, MIND, V117, P613, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzn037; Nover H., 2004, MIND, V113, P305","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzn053",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","342UI","WOS:000258808700005",,,,,"2018-01-02",228.0,"durrettr fellerw finetl noverh colyvanm","cluster_0"
-0.29061624756406407,-0.19450884362928764,19.0,22.0,22.0,0.0,0.0,2006.0,115.0,460.0,891.0,916.0,26.0,"J","Hyman, J",,,,"Hyman, John",,,"Knowledge and evidence","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"The 'modest' theory of knowledge defended in Timothy Williamson's book Knowledge and its Limits is compared here with the theory defended in the author's articles 'How Knowledge Works' and 'Knowledge and Self-Knowledge'. It is argued that there are affinities between these theories, but that the latter has considerably more explanatory power.","Univ Oxford Queens Coll, Oxford OX1 4AW, England","Hyman, J (reprint author), Univ Oxford Queens Coll, Oxford OX1 4AW, England.","john.hyman@queens.ox.ac.uk",,,,,"Dancy J., 1985, INTRO CONT EPISTEMOL; FRENCH PA, 1980, MIDWEST STUDIES PHIL, V5; Hyman J, 1999, PHILOS QUART, V49, P433, DOI 10.1111/1467-9213.00152 ; Kenny A., 1989, METAPHYSICS MIND; Kenny A., 1975, WILL FREEDOM POWER; KENNY Anthony, 1963, ACTION EMOTION WILL; KYLE G, 1971, COLLECTED PAPERS, V2; KYLE G, 1949, CONCEPT MIND; Prior A.N., 1971, OBJECTS OF THOUGHT; Quine Willard Van Orman, 1960, WORD OBJECT; Rumfitt I, 2003, PHILOSOPHY, V78, P461, DOI 10.1017/s0031819103000433; Rundle B, 2001, LANG COMMUN, V21, P143, DOI 10.1016/S0271-5309(00)00017-3 ; Rundle B., 1979, GRAMMAR PHILOS; RYLE G, 1946, KNOWING KNOWING; Schroeder Severin, 2001, WITTGENSTEIN CONT PH; Strawson P. F., 1950, P AR SOC S, VXXIV; White A., 1982, NATURE KNOWLEDGE; Williamson T., 2000, KNOWLEDGE ITS LIMITS; Wittgenstein L., 1958, PHILOS INVESTIGATION","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzl891",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","094ZG","WOS:000241277400003",,,,,"2018-01-02",229.0,"frenchpa hymanj kennya kennya kennyanthony kyleg kyleg prioran quinewillardvanorman rumfitti rundleb rundleb ryleg schroederseverin strawsonpf whitea williamsont wittgensteinl dancyj","cluster_0"
-0.7218073757236156,-0.544498083037958,27.0,22.0,22.0,0.0,0.0,2006.0,115.0,458.0,261.0,309.0,49.0,"J","Kment, B",,,,"Kment, B",,,"Counterfactuals and explanation","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"On the received view, counterfactuals are analysed using the concept of closeness between possible worlds: the counterfactual 'If it had been the case that p, then it would have been the case that q' is true at a world w just in case q is true at all the possible p-worlds closest to w. The degree of closeness between two worlds is usually thought to be determined by weighting different respects of similarity between them. The question I consider in the paper is which weights attach to different respects of similarity. I start by considering Lewis's answer to the question and argue against it by presenting several counterexamples. I use the same examples to motivate a general principle about closeness: if a fact obtains in both of two worlds, then this similarity is relevant to the closeness between them if and only if the fact has the same explanation in the two worlds. I use this principle and some ideas of Lewis's to formulate a general account of counterfactuals, and I argue that this account can explain the asymmetry of counterfactual dependence. The paper concludes with a discussion of some examples that cannot be accommodated by the present version of the account and therefore necessitate further work on the details.","Univ Michigan, Dept Philosophy, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA","Kment, B (reprint author), Univ Michigan, Dept Philosophy, 2215 Angell Hall,435 S State St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.","bkment@umich.edu",,,,,"Adams E., 1975, LOGIC CONDITIONALS; ASQUITH P, 1984, PSA P BIENN M PHIL S; Bennet J.F., 2003, PHILOS GUIDE CONDITI; BENNETT J, 1984, PHILOS REV, V93, P57, DOI 10.2307/2184413 ; Bennett J., 1974, CANADIAN J PHILOS, V4, P381; COLLIN SJH, 2004, CAUSATION COUNTERFAC; DOWE P, 2003, CAUSATION COUNTERFAC; Edgington D., 2003, CAUSATION COUNTERFAC, P12; Elga A., 2001, PHILOS SCI, V68, P313; FINE K, 1975, MIND, V84, P451; JACKSON F, 1977, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V55, P3, DOI 10.1080/00048407712341001 ; JOHNSON D, 1991, PHILOS REV, V100, P399, DOI 10.2307/2185066 ; KMENT B, IN PRESS PHILOS PERS; KMENT B, SIMILARITY ACCOUNT C; Lange M., 2000, NATURAL LAWS SCI PRA; LEWIS D, 1979, NOUS, V13, P455, DOI 10.2307/2215339 ; Lewis D., 1973, COUNTERFACTUALS; Lewis D., 1973, J PHILOS, V70, P556, DOI DOI 10.2307/2025310; LEWIS D., 1986, PHILOS PAPERS, VII; Martensson Johan, 1999, SUBJUNCTIVE CONDITIO; Nolan D., 1997, NOTRE DAME J FORM L, V28, P535, DOI DOI 10.1305/NDJFL/1039540769; Nute D., 1980, TOPICS CONDITIONAL L; SALMON W, 1984, SCI EXPLANATION 3, P293; SLOTE MA, 1978, PHILOS REV, V87, P3, DOI 10.2307/2184345 ; Stalnaker R, 1968, STUDIES LOGICAL THEO, V2, P98; TICHY P, 1976, PHILOS STUD, V29, P271, DOI 10.1007/BF00411887 ; WASSERMAN R, IN PRESS FUTURE SIMI","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzl261",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","051VH","WOS:000238189300003",,,,,"2018-01-02",230.0,"asquithp bennetjf bennettj bennettj collinsjh dowep edgingtond elgaa finek jacksonf johnsond kmentb kmentb langem lewisd lewisd lewisd lewisd martenssonjohan noland nuted salmonw slotema stalnakerr tichyp wassermanr adamse","cluster_3"
-0.09753234690651623,-0.08272715713551197,7.0,22.0,22.0,0.0,0.0,1993.0,102.0,406.0,285.0,299.0,15.0,"J","FIELD, H",,,,"FIELD, H",,,"THE CONCEPTUAL CONTINGENCY OF MATHEMATICAL OBJECTS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"FIELD, H (reprint author), CUNY,GRAD CTR,NEW YORK,NY 10036, USA.",,,,,,"Field H., 1989, REALISM MATH MODALIT; Friedman Michael, 1974, J PHILOS, V71, P5, DOI DOI 10.2307/2024924; Hale R., 1987, ABSTRACT OBJECTS; HALE R, 1992, J PHILOS, V89, P111; KITCHER P, 1981, PHILOS SCI, V48, P507, DOI 10.1086/289019 ; WRIGHT C, 1988, REV INT PHILOS, V42, P425; WRIGHT C, 1983, CONCEPTION NUMBERS O","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/102.406.285",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","LB007","WOS:A1993LB00700005",,,,,"2018-01-02",231.0,"friedmanmichael haler haler kitcherp wrightc wrightc fieldh","cluster_0"
-0.01661507916913548,0.10826105634271681,4.0,22.0,22.0,0.0,0.0,1985.0,94.0,375.0,409.0,419.0,11.0,"J","SCHEFFLER, S",,,,"SCHEFFLER, S",,,"AGENT-CENTERED RESTRICTIONS, RATIONALITY, AND THE VIRTUES","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"SCHEFFLER, S (reprint author), UNIV CALIF BERKELEY,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,BERKELEY,CA 94720, USA.",,,,,,"FOOT P, 1985, MIND, V94, P196; Foot P., 1978, VIRTUES VICES; Foot P., 1983, P ADDRESSES AM PHILO, V57, P273; Scheffler Samuel, 1982, REJECTION CONSEQUENT","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","AMU99","WOS:A1985AMU9900005",,,,,"2018-01-02",232.0,"footp footp schefflersamuel footp","cluster_6"
0.02958941711033143,0.03394262040103831,7.0,22.0,22.0,0.0,0.0,1983.0,92.0,368.0,519.0,529.0,11.0,"J","JEFFERSON, M",,,,"JEFFERSON, M",,,"WHAT IS WRONG WITH SENTIMENTALITY","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"BURGESS A, EARTHLY POWERS; DESAINTPOINT V, FUTURIST MANIFESTOS; FORSTER EM, PASSAGE INDIA; LAWRENCE DH, PHOENIX; MIDGLEY M, 1979, PHILOSOPHY, P385; TANNER M, 1976, PAS, P144; WILDE O, LETTERS","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","RL245","WOS:A1983RL24500003",,,,,"2018-01-02",233.0,"desaintpointv forsterem lawrencedh midgleym tannerm wildeo burgessa","cluster_5"
-0.3059878241103812,-0.1446374146149076,11.0,22.0,22.0,0.0,0.0,1980.0,89.0,353.0,114.0,120.0,7.0,"J","BACH, K",,,,"BACH, K",,,"ACTIONS ARE NOT EVENTS","MIND",,,"English","Note",,,,,,,,,,"BACH, K (reprint author), CALIF STATE UNIV SAN FRANCISCO,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94132, USA.",,,,,,"BACH K, 1978, PHILOS STUD, V34, P361, DOI 10.1007/BF00364703 ; CHISHOLM RM, 1964, J PHILOS, V61, P613, DOI 10.2307/2023443 ; Davidson D., 1971, AGENT ACTION REASON, P3; DAVIS LH, 1979, THEORY ACTION, P35; Goldman A., 1970, THEORY HUMAN ACTION; KIM J, 1976, ACTION THEORY, P173; Prichard H. A., 1949, MORAL OBLIGATION, P187; RESCHER N, 1966, LOGIC DECISION ACTIO, P81; Thomson J. J., 1977, ACTS OTHER EVENTS; VONWRIGHT GH, 1963, NORM ACTION, P35; WILSON NL, 1974, PHILOS STUD, V25, P303, DOI 10.1007/BF00355495","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","JD044","WOS:A1980JD04400011",,,,,"2018-01-02",234.0,"chisholmrm davidsond davislh goldmana kimj prichardha reschern thomsonjj vonwrightgh wilsonnl bachk","cluster_0"
-0.4662034470925829,-0.26332642015702695,17.0,22.0,22.0,0.0,0.0,1979.0,88.0,350.0,179.0,196.0,18.0,"J","STROUD, B",,,,"STROUD, B",,,"INFERENCE, BELIEF, AND UNDERSTANDING","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"STROUD, B (reprint author), UNIV CALIF BERKELEY,BERKELEY,CA 94720, USA.",,,,,,"BLACK M, 1970, MARGINS PRECISION; CARROLL L, 1895, MIND, P278; CHERNIAK C, 1977, THESIS U CALIFORNIA; Chomsky Noam, 1965, ASPECTS THEORY SYNTA, P3; CHOMSKY N, 1976, REFLECTIONS LANGUAGE, P163; DAVIDSON D, 1974, PHILOSOPHY PSYCHOLOG; Davidson D., 1970, EXPERIENCE THEORY; DENNETT D, 1975, MINNESOTA STUDIES PH, V7, P410; Dennett D. D., 1973, ESSAYS FREEDOM ACTIO; DUMMETT M, 1975, MIND LANGUAGE, P121; DUMMETT M, 1973, FREGE PHILOSOPHY LAN, P461; Harman G., 1970, INDUCTION ACCEPTANCE; HUME, 1958, TREATISE HUMAN NATUR, P628; MCDOWELL J, 1977, MIND; THOMSON JF, 1960, RATIO, P95; THOMSON JJ, 1965, PHILOSOPHY AM, P294; Wittgenstein L., 1953, PHILOSOPHICAL INVEST","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","GT681","WOS:A1979GT68100002",,,,,"2018-01-02",235.0,"carrolll cherniakc chomskynoam chomskyn davidsond davidsond dennettd dennettdd dummettm dummettm harmang hume mcdowellj thomsonjf thomsonjj wittgensteinl blackm","cluster_0"
0.06551678085596341,0.06157746137243047,7.0,22.0,22.0,0.0,0.0,1975.0,84.0,335.0,390.0,402.0,13.0,"J","TAYLOR, G",,,,"TAYLOR, G",,,"JUSTIFYING EMOTIONS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"UNIV OXFORD,ST ANNES COLL,OXFORD,ENGLAND",,,,,,,"AQUINAS St. Thomas, SUMMA THEOLOGICA; ARISTOTLE, NICOMACHEAN ETHICS, pCH1; AUSTIN J, EMMA, V3, pCH7; AUSTIN J, EMMA, V2, pCH6; EWING, 1957, P ARISTOTELEAN SOC; GOSLING JCB, 1965, PHILOSOPHICAL REV; THALBERG I, 1964, AM PHILOSOPHICAL JAN","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","AJ175","WOS:A1975AJ17500005",,,,,"2018-01-02",236.0,"aristotle austinj austinj ewing goslingjcb thalbergi aquinasstthomas","cluster_4"
0.005144786711559001,0.05222121793865845,4.0,22.0,22.0,0.0,0.0,1972.0,81.0,322.0,225.0,243.0,19.0,"J","KNEALE, W",,,,"KNEALE, W",,,"PROPOSITIONS AND TRUTH IN NATURAL LANGUAGES","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"CZCERO, ORATORE; MOORE GE, ESSAYS RETROSPECT; PLATO, DEFINITIONES; SEXTUS EMPIRICUS, ADVERSUS MATHEMATICO, V8","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","Z1111","WOS:A1972Z111100005",,,,,"2018-01-02",237.0,"moorege plato sextusempiricus czcero","cluster_6"
-0.03395585933327,0.10562947218303347,9.0,22.0,22.0,0.0,0.0,1967.0,76.0,303.0,309.0,326.0,18.0,"J","HARE, RM",,,,"HARE, RM",,,"ALLEGED DIFFERENCES BETWEEN IMPERATIVES AND INDICATIVES","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"BALLIOL COLL,OXFORD,ENGLAND",,,,,,,"CASTANEDA HN, 1955, PH STUDIES; FISHER EMW, 1962, MIND; GRICE, 1961, AR SOC S, P126; HARE RM, FREEDOM REASON, P36; HARE RM, 1954, MIND; HARE RM, LANGUAGE OF MORALS, pN27; KENNY, 1966, ANALYSIS, V26, P65; PRIOR, FORMAL LOGIC, P220; WILLIAMS BAO, 1963, ANAL S, P32","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","ZA896","WOS:A1967ZA89600001",,,,,"2018-01-02",239.0,"fisheremw grice harerm harerm harerm kenny prior williamsbao castanedahn","cluster_6"
0.02719356369014623,0.02920614232828151,1.0,22.0,22.0,0.0,0.0,1958.0,67.0,268.0,542.0,543.0,2.0,"J","SMART, RN",,,,"SMART, RN",,,"NEGATIVE UTILITARIANISM - DISCUSSION","MIND",,,"English","Discussion",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"POPPER, 1952, OPEN SOC ITS ENEMIES, V1, pCH5","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","CCP46","WOS:A1958CCP4600010",,,,,"2018-01-02",240.0,"popper","cluster_4"
-0.9771024335332336,-0.6948817869650964,65.0,21.0,21.0,0.0,1.0,2009.0,118.0,470.0,241.0,294.0,54.0,"J","Blome-Tillmann, M",,,,"Blome-Tillmann, Michael",,,"Knowledge and Presuppositions","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"RELEVANT ALTERNATIVES; CONTEXTUALISM; SKEPTICISM; CONTRASTIVISM; ATTRIBUTIONS; STANDARDS","The paper explicates a new way to model the context-sensitivity of 'knows', namely a way that suggests a close connection between the content of 'knows' in a context C and what is pragmatically presupposed in C. After explicating my new approach in the first half of the paper and arguing that it is explanatorily superior to standard accounts of epistemic contextualism, the paper points, in its second half, to some interesting new features of the emerging account, such as its compatibility with the intuitions of Moorean dogmatists. Finally, the paper shows that the account defended is not subject to the most prominent and familiar philosophical objections to epistemic contextualism discussed in the recent literature.","Univ Coll, Oxford OX1 4BH, England","Blome-Tillmann, M (reprint author), Univ Coll, Oxford OX1 4BH, England.","michael.blome@univ.ox.ac.uk",,,,,"Almog J., 1989, THEMES KAPLAN; ALSTON W.P, 2005, JUSTIFICATION DIMENS; Bergmann M, 2004, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V69, P709, DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2004.tb00524.x ; Blome-Tillmann M, 2008, PHILOS STUD, V138, P29, DOI 10.1007/s11098-006-0008-2; BLOME-TILLMANN M., 2006, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, P383; BLOMETILLMANN M, 2007, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC N, V107, P387; BLOMETILLMANN M, PHILOS STUD IN PRESS; BOGDAN RJ, 1986, BELIEF CONTENT FUNCT; Brueckner A, 2002, PHILOS STUD, V110, P285, DOI 10.1023/A:1020627215034 ; COHEN S, 1999, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V13, P57; Comesana J, 2005, SYNTHESE, V146, P395, DOI 10.1007/s11229-004-6213-7; DEROSE K, 1992, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V52, P913, DOI 10.2307/2107917 ; DEROSE K, 1995, PHILOS REV, V104, P1, DOI 10.2307/2186011 ; DeRose K, 2004, PHILOS STUD, V119, P1, DOI 10.1023/B:PHIL.0000029347.01790.f2 ; De Rose K., 1999, SKEPTICISM CONT READ; Derose K, 2006, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V73, P316, DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2006.tb00620.x ; FELDMAN R, 1999, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V13, P91; FOGELIN R, 2000, PHILOS ISSUES, V10, P43; Gauker C, 1998, PHILOS STUD, V91, P149, DOI 10.1023/A:1004247202476 ; GOLDBERG S, 2007, INTERNALISM EXTERNAL; GRIMM RH, 1988, CONTENTS THOUGHT; HADDOCK A, 2008, NEW ESSAYS DISJUNCTI; HAWTHORNE J., 2004, KNOWLEDGE LOTTERIES; HAWTHORNE J, 2005, OXFORD STUDIES EPIST; HELLER M, 1989, PHILOS STUD, V55, P23, DOI 10.1007/BF00372717 ; HELLER M, 1999, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V13, P115; Kornblith H., 2000, PHILOS ISSUES, V10, P24; Kvanvig JL, 2007, PHILOS STUD, V134, P131, DOI 10.1007/s11098-007-9085-0; LEHRER K, 2000, PHILOS ISSUES, V10, P33; Lewis D., 1986, PLURALITY WORLDS; Lewis D., 1973, COUNTERFACTUALS; Moore G. E., 1939, P BRIT ACAD, V25, P273; Munitz M, 1974, SEMANTICS PHILOS; Neta R, 2003, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V67, P396, DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00296.x ; Neta R, 2003, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V66, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00241.x ; Neta R, 2002, NOUS, V36, P663, DOI 10.1111/1468-0068.00406 ; NETA R, 2005, GRAZ PHIL S, V69, P183; NETA R, SOCIAL EPIS IN PRESS; Perry J., 2001, REFERENCE REFLEXIVIT; Preyer Gerhard, 2005, CONTEXTUALISM PHILOS; Pritchard D, 2002, AM PHILOS QUART, V39, P215; PRITCHARD D, 2006, NOTRE DAME PHILOS RE; Rieber S, 1998, NOUS, V32, P189, DOI 10.1111/0029-4624.00096 ; Rysiew P, 2001, NOUS, V35, P477, DOI 10.1111/0029-4624.00349 ; Schaer J, 2007, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V75, P383, DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00081.x ; Schaffer J, 2004, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V69, P138, DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2004.tb00387.x ; Schaffer J, 2004, PHILOS STUD, V119, P73, DOI 10.1023/B:PHIL.0000029351.56460.8c ; Schiffer, 1996, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V96, P317, DOI DOI 10.1093/ARIST0TELIAN/96.1.317; SOSA E, 1986, J PHILOS, V83, P584, DOI 10.2307/2026435 ; SOSA E, 2005, ROUTLEDGE ENCY PHILO; SOSA E, 2000, PHILOS ISSUES, V10, P1; Stalnaker R, 2004, PHILOS STUD, V119, P105, DOI 10.1023/B:PHIL.0000029352.53791.42 ; Stalnaker R, 2002, LINGUIST PHILOS, V25, P701, DOI 10.1023/A:1020867916902 ; STALNAKER R, 1999, CONTEXT CONTENT, P31; STALNAKER R, 1999, CONTEXT CONTENT, P117; Stalnaker Robert C., 1984, INQUIRY; Stanley Jason., 2005, KNOWLEDGE PRACTICAL; THOMSON J, 2006, CONTENT MODALITY THE; UNGER P., 1975, IGNORANCE CASE SCEPT; VILLANUEVA E, 2000, PHILOS ISSUES, V10, P67; von Fintel K, 2008, PHILOS PERSPECT, V22, P137, DOI 10.1111/j.1520-8583.2008.00144.x; Williams M, 2001, PHILOS STUD, V103, P1, DOI 10.1023/A:1010349100272 ; Williamson T, 2001, PHILOS STUD, V103, P25, DOI 10.1023/A:1010368318927 ; Williamson T., 2000, KNOWLEDGE ITS LIMITS; Wright C, 2005, PHILOS QUART, V55, P236, DOI 10.1111/j.0031-8094.2005.00397.x","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423","1460-2113",,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzp032",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","473WW","WOS:000268243400001",,,,,"2018-01-02",241.0,"alstonwp bergmannm blometillmannm blometillmannm blometillmannm blometillmannm bogdanrj bruecknera cohens comesanaj derosek derosek derosek derosek derosek feldmanr fogelinr gaukerc goldbergs grimmrh haddocka hawthornej hawthornej hellerm hellerm kornblithh kvanvigjl lehrerk lewisd lewisd moorege munitzm netar netar netar netar netar perryj preyergerhard pritchardd pritchardd riebers rysiewp schaerj schafferj schafferj schiffer sosae sosae sosae stalnakerr stalnakerr stalnakerr stalnakerr stalnakerrobertc stanleyjason thomsonj ungerp villanuevae vonfintelk williamsm williamsont williamsont wrightc almogj","cluster_3"
-0.3216073036373228,-0.15110813509223955,22.0,21.0,21.0,0.0,1.0,2006.0,115.0,457.0,19.0,39.0,21.0,"J","Gibbons, J",,,,"Gibbons, J",,,"Access externalism","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"INTERNALISM","This paper argues for externalism about justification on the basis of thought experiments. I present cases in which two individuals are intrinsically and introspectively indistinguishable and in which intuitively, one is justified in believing that p while the other is not. I also examine an argument for internalism based on the ideas that we have privileged access to whether or not our own beliefs are justified and that only internalism is compatible with this privilege. I isolate what I take to be the most plausible form of privileged access to justification and show that it is compatible with externalism.","Univ Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA","Gibbons, J (reprint author), Univ Nebraska, 1042 Oldfather Hall, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA.","jgibbons2@unl.edu",,,,,"ADLER J, 2002, BELIEF OWN ETHICS; ALSTON W., 1989, EPISTEMIC JUSTIFICAT; ALSTON W, 1988, P WORLD C PHIL, V5, P172; ALSTON W, 1989, PHILOS TOPICS, V14, P185; ALSTON W, 1985, MONIST, V68, P81; BonJour Laurence, 1980, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V5, P53, DOI DOI 10.1111/MISP.1980.5.ISSUE-1; BURGE T, 1988, J PHILOS, V85; CHISHOLM R, 1977, THEORY KNOWLEDGE; FRENCH PA, 1980, MIDWEST STUDIES PHIL, V5; GETTIER E. L., 1963, ANALYSIS, V23, P121, DOI DOI 10.1093/ANALYS/23.6.121; GIBBONS J, 1996, PHILOS REV, V105; GINET C., 1975, KNOWLEDGE PERCEPTION; GOLDMAN AI, 1976, J PHILOS, V73, P771, DOI 10.2307/2025679 ; Goldman AI, 1999, J PHILOS, V96, P271, DOI 10.2307/2564679 ; GRECO J, 1990, SYNTHESE, V85, P245, DOI 10.1007/BF00484794 ; KORNBLITH H, 1983, PHILOS REV, V92; MILLER R, 1995, PHILOS REV, V104; Moore G. E, 1962, COMMONPLACE BOOK 191; PLANTINGA A, 1993, WARRANT CURRENT DEBA; Pryor J, 2001, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V52, P95, DOI 10.1093/bjps/52.1.95 ; WILLIAMSON T, 1995, MIND, V104, P533, DOI 10.1093/mind/104.415.533 ; Williamson T., 2000, KNOWLEDGE ITS LIMITS","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzl019",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","027RT","WOS:000236433800002",,,,,"2018-01-02",242.0,"alstonw alstonw alstonw alstonw bonjourlaurence burget chisholmr frenchpa gettierel gibbonsj ginetc goldmanai goldmanai grecoj kornblithh millerr moorege plantingaa pryorj williamsont williamsont adlerj","cluster_0"
-0.271134034092288,-0.029188777315255807,32.0,21.0,21.0,0.0,0.0,2005.0,114.0,453.0,31.0,59.0,29.0,"J","Hershenov, D",,,,"Hershenov, D",,,"Do dead bodies pose a problem for biological approaches to personal identity?","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"SUNY Coll Buffalo, Natl Ctr Ontol Res, Dept Philosophy, Buffalo, NY 14222 USA","Hershenov, D (reprint author), SUNY Coll Buffalo, Natl Ctr Ontol Res, Dept Philosophy, 135 Pk Hall, Buffalo, NY 14222 USA.","dh25@buffalo.edu",,,,,"Baker LR, 1999, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V59, P151, DOI 10.2307/2653462 ; Baker Lynne Rudder, 2000, PERSONS BODIES CONST; BECKER L, 1973, PHILOS PUBLIC AFF, V4, P334; BERRILL NJ, 1971, DEV BIOL; BURKE MB, 1994, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V54, P591, DOI 10.2307/2108583 ; Carter W., 1999, PHILOS PHENOMENOLOGI, V54, P161; CARTER WR, 1988, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V66, P308, DOI 10.1080/00048408812343391 ; Crick F, 1981, LIFE ITSELF ITS ORIG; DANCY J, 1997, READING PARFIT, P202; ELIAS H, 1971, BASIC HUMAN ANATOMY; Feldman, 2000, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V24, P98; Feldman Fred, 1992, CONFRONTATIONS REAPE; FORD NM, 1988, DID I BEGIN CONCEPTI; GRANDY R, 1985, PHILOS GROUNDS RATIO; GREEN MB, 1980, PHILOS PUBLIC AFF, V9, P105; Locke John, 1975, ESSAY HUMAN UNDERSTA; MACKIE D, 1999, PHILOS STUD, V95, P218; Olson E., 1997, HUMAN ANIMAL IDENTIT; OLSON E, 2001, LINE FIELD GUIDE PHI; OLSON E, 2002, NOUS, P682; OLSON E, 1996, PACIFIC PHILOS Q, V77, P373; Olson ET, 1997, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V57, P95, DOI 10.2307/2953779 ; Olson ET, 2001, PHILOS QUART, V51, P337, DOI 10.1111/1467-9213.00233 ; Shoemaker S, 1999, NOUS, V33, P496, DOI 10.1111/0029-4624.00166 ; SHOEMAKER S, 1999, ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, P287; SHOEMAKER S, 1963, SELF KNOWLDGE SELF I; UNGER P, 1991, CONSCIOUSNESS IDENTI; van Inwagen Peter, 1991, MAT BEINGS; VANINWAGEN P, 1990, TIME CAUSE ESSAYS PR; Wiggins D., 1980, SAMENESS SUBSTANCE; Young J. Z, 1971, STUDY MAN; ZIMMERMAN D, 1995, PHILOS REV, V104, P55","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fz031",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","890OA","WOS:000226519500002",,,,,"2018-01-02",243.0,"bakerlynnerudder beckerl berrillnj burkemb carterw carterwr crickf dancyj eliash feldman feldmanfred fordnm grandyr greenmb lockejohn mackied olsone olsone olsone olsone olsonet olsonet shoemakers shoemakers shoemakers ungerp vaninwagenpeter vaninwagenp wigginsd youngjz zimmermand bakerlr","cluster_3"
0.02759162963029039,0.030058506618420806,8.0,21.0,21.0,0.0,1.0,2001.0,110.0,440.0,1027.0,1037.0,11.0,"J","McGrew, T; McGrew, L; Vestrup, E",,,,"McGrew, T; McGrew, L; Vestrup, E",,,"Probabilities and the fine-tuning argument: A sceptical view","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"Proponents of the Fine-Tuning Argument frequently assume that the narrowness of the life-friendly range of fundamental physical constants implies a low probability for the origin of the universe 'by chance'. We cast this argument in a more rigorous form than is customary and conclude that the narrow intervals do not yield a probability at all because the resulting measure function is non-normalizable. We then consider various attempts to circumvent this problem and argue that they fail.","Western Michigan Univ, Dept Philosophy, Kalamazoo, MI 49008 USA; Depaul Univ, Dept Mat, Chicago, IL 60604 USA","McGrew, T (reprint author), Western Michigan Univ, Dept Philosophy, Kalamazoo, MI 49008 USA.",,,,,,"Barrow J. D., 1986, ANTHROPIC COSMOLOGIC; CARTER B, 1974, PHYSICAL COSMOLOGY P; Dembski W., 1998, MERE CREATION; Leslie J., 1989, UNIVERSES; LESLIE J, 1990, PHYSICAL COSMOLOGY P; Manson NA, 2000, INQUIRY, V43, P341, DOI 10.1080/002017400414890 ; ROSS H, 1998, MERE CREATION; SHAPIRO R, 1990, PHYSICAL COSMOLOGY P","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/110.440.1027",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","488MJ","WOS:000171940000004",,,,,"2018-01-02",244.0,"carterb dembskiw lesliej lesliej mansonna rossh shapiror barrowjd","cluster_0"
-0.5711247508448164,-0.5034210125521196,32.0,21.0,21.0,0.0,0.0,1993.0,102.0,408.0,629.0,644.0,16.0,"J","LOWE, EJ",,,,"LOWE, EJ",,,"THE CAUSAL AUTONOMY OF THE MENTAL","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"LOWE, EJ (reprint author), UNIV DURHAM,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,50 OLD ELVET,DURHAM DH1 3HN,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"BAKER LR, 1987, SAVING BELIEF CRITIQ; Beckermann A., 1992, EMERGENCE REDUCTION; Broad C.D, 1925, MIND ITS PLACE NATUR; Campbell K., 1990, ABSTRACT PARTICULARS; CRANE T, 1990, MIND, V99, P185; CRANE T, 1992, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V92, P185; CRANE T, 1992, IN PRESS INT J PHILO; Davidson D., 1993, MENTAL CAUSATION; DAVIDSON D, 1980, ESSAYS ACTIONS EVENT; Dawkins R., 1982, EXTENDED PHENOTYPE G; DEECKE L, 1969, EXP BRAIN RES, V7, P158; Dennett Daniel, 1991, CONSCIOUSNESS EXPLAI; DENNETT DC, 1991, J PHILOS, V88, P27, DOI 10.2307/2027085 ; Dretske F., 1993, MENTAL CAUSATION; Mele A., 1993, MENTAL CAUSATION; Heil J., 1992, NATURE TRUE MINDS; HONDERICH T, 1990, MIND BRAIN THEORY DE, V1; Kim J., 1992, EMERGENCE REDUCTION; LIBET B, 1985, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V8, P529, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X00044903 ; LOAR B, 1992, REDUCTION EXPLANATIO; LOWE EJ, 1980, ANALYSIS, V40, P50, DOI 10.2307/3327327 ; LOWE EJ, 1992, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V70, P263, DOI 10.1080/00048409212345161 ; LOWE EJ, 1989, KINDS BEING STUDY IN; MACDONALD C, 1986, PHILOS QUART, V36, P145, DOI 10.2307/2219765 ; MACDONALD C, 1989, MIND BODY IDENTITY T; MACDONALD G, 1992, ARIST SOC P, V66, P225; McGinn C., 1991, PROBLEM CONSCIOUSNES; Mele A., 1992, SPRINGS ACTION UNDER; OWENS DJ, 1992, CAUSES COINCIDENCES; Ramsey W., 1990, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V4; SEARLE J. R., 1992, REDISCOVERY MIND; YABLO S, 1992, PHILOS REV, V101, P245, DOI 10.2307/2185535","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","ME231","WOS:A1993ME23100004",,,,,"2018-01-02",245.0,"beckermanna broadcd campbellk cranet cranet cranet davidsond davidsond dawkinsr deeckel dennettdaniel dennettdc dretskef melea heilj hondericht kimj libetb loarb loweej loweej loweej macdonaldc macdonaldc macdonaldg mcginnc melea owensdj ramseyw searlejr yablos bakerlr","cluster_0"
0.027777293845369186,0.0303124475799691,20.0,21.0,21.0,0.0,1.0,1992.0,101.0,403.0,521.0,540.0,20.0,"J","LESLIE, J",,,,"LESLIE, J",,,"TIME AND THE ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"VACUUM STABILITY; END",,,"LESLIE, J (reprint author), UNIV GUELPH,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,GUELPH N1G 2W1,ONTARIO,CANADA.",,,,,,"CARTER B, 1983, PHILOS T R SOC A, V310, P347, DOI 10.1098/rsta.1983.0096; Carter B., 1974, CONFRONTATION COSMOL, P291; COLEMAN S, 1980, PHYS REV D, V21, P3305, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.21.3305 ; DICKE RH, 1961, NATURE, V92, P440; DYSON FJ, 1979, REV MOD PHYS, V51, P447, DOI 10.1103/RevModPhys.51.447 ; ELLIS J, 1990, PHYS LETT B, V252, P203, DOI 10.1016/0370-2693(90)90862-Z; HAWKING SW, 1979, GENERAL RELATIVITY E; HUT P, 1983, NATURE, V302, P508, DOI 10.1038/302508a0 ; LANGFORD D, 1979, WAR 2080; LEDERMAN L, 1989, QUARKS COSMOS; LESLIE J, 1990, PHILOS QUART, V40, P65, DOI 10.2307/2219967 ; Leslie J., 1989, UNIVERSES; LESLIE J, 1990, PHYSICAL COSMOLOGY P; LESLIE J, 1992, IN PRESS PHILOSOPHIA; LESLIE J, 1989, B CANADIAN NUCLEAR S, V10, P10; MAROCHNIK LS, 1983, ASTROPHYS SPACE SCI, V89, P61, DOI 10.1007/BF01008385 ; NIELSEN HB, 1989, ACTA PHYS POL B, V20, P427; SHER M, 1989, PHYS REP, V179, P273, DOI 10.1016/0370-1573(89)90061-6 ; Turner M. S., 1982, Nature, V298, P633, DOI 10.1038/298633a0; WHEELER JA, 1973, GRAVITATION, P1196","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/101.403.521",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","JG315","WOS:A1992JG31500006",,,,,"2018-01-02",246.0,"carterb colemans dickerh dysonfj ellisj hawkingsw hutp langfordd ledermanl lesliej lesliej lesliej lesliej lesliej marochnikls nielsenhb sherm turnerms wheelerja carterb","cluster_0"
-0.07382321331287134,-0.0692168294427805,13.0,21.0,21.0,0.0,1.0,1978.0,87.0,345.0,22.0,45.0,24.0,"J","ACHINSTEIN, P",,,,"ACHINSTEIN, P",,,"CONCEPTS OF EVIDENCE","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"ACHINSTEIN, P (reprint author), JOHNS HOPKINS UNIV,BALTIMORE,MD 21218, USA.",,,,,,"ACHINSTEIN P, 1977, AM PHILOS QUART, V14, P1; ACHINSTEIN P, 1975, CAN J PHILOS, V5, P1; CARNAP R, 1962, LOGICAL F PROBABILIT, pR16; HANSON NR, 1958, PATTERNS DISCOVERY, P72; HARMAN GH, 1965, PHILOS REV, V64, P88; HESSE M, 1974, STRUCTURE SCIENTIFIC, P134; JAMES D, LOCH NESS INVESTIGAT; KORNER S, 1975, EXPLANATION, P1; POPPER K, 1959, LOGIC SCI DISCOVERY, P407; Salmon, 1971, STATISTICAL EXPLANAT; SALMON W, 1975, MINNESOTA STUDIES PH, V6, P5; SKYRMS B, 1967, J PHILOS, V64, P373, DOI 10.2307/2024269 ; SWINBURNE R, 1973, INTRO CONFIRMATION T, P3","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","EG814","WOS:A1978EG81400002",,,,,"2018-01-02",247.0,"achinsteinp carnapr hansonnr harmangh hessem jamesd korners popperk salmon salmonw skyrmsb swinburner achinsteinp","cluster_0"
-0.008566102240070985,-0.007394765666492162,9.0,21.0,21.0,0.0,0.0,1970.0,79.0,316.0,586.0,590.0,5.0,"J","TRENTMAN, J",,,,"TRENTMAN, J",,,"OCKHAM ON MENTAL","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"MCGILL UNIV,MONTREAL,QUEBEC,CANADA",,,,,,,"BAUDRY L, 1958, LEXIQUE PHILOSOPHIQU, P289; BOEHNER P, 1958, COLLECTED ARTICLES O, P219; DESMOND PH, 1967, LOGIC ST ANSELM, P26; GEACH P, 1957, MENTAL ACTS, P102; OCKHAM, SUMMA TOTIUS LOGICAE; OCKHAM, 1488, QUODLIBETA SEPTEM; OCKHAM, QUESTIONES FOUR SENT, V2; SCOTUS, OXON; STAUGUSTINE, TRINITATE, V15","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","Y1847","WOS:A1970Y184700009",,,,,"2018-01-02",248.0,"boehnerp desmondph geachp ockham ockham ockham scotus staugustine baudryl","cluster_0"
-0.004628610726799615,0.02533129378039504,6.0,21.0,21.0,0.0,0.0,1967.0,76.0,304.0,479.0,492.0,14.0,"J","DRETSKE, FI",,,,"DRETSKE, FI",,,"CAN EVENTS MOVE","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"UNIV WISCONSIN,MADISON,WI",,,,,,,"BERGMAN G, 1960, MEANING EXISTENCE, P230; MAYO B, 1954, PHILOSOPHY ANALYSIS, P173; QUINE, 1960, WORD OBJECT, P130; SMART JJC, 1956, ESSAYS CONCEPTUAL AN; SOMMERS F, 1963, PHILOSOPHICAL REV, V72, P343; WISDOM JO, 1963, MIND, V72, P344","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","ZA897","WOS:A1967ZA89700002",,,,,"2018-01-02",249.0,"mayob quine smartjjc sommersf wisdomjo bergmang","cluster_0"
-0.10956244732588971,0.026096842246465853,14.0,21.0,21.0,0.0,2.0,1962.0,71.0,283.0,307.0,325.0,19.0,"J","SHAFFER, J",,,,"SHAFFER, J",,,"EXISTENCE, PREDICATION, AND THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"BROAD CD, 1953, RELIG PHILOS PSYCHIC, P182; CARNAP R, 1950, REV INT PHILOS, P21; HUME, DIALOGUES CONCERNI 9; HUME D, DIALOGUES CONCERNI 9; HUME D, 1902, ENQUIRIES CONCERNING, P164; HUME D, 1888, TREATISE HUMAN NATUR, P66; KANT, 1953, CRITIQUE PURE REASON, P504; MALCOLM N, 1960, PHILOS REV, V69, P41, DOI 10.2307/2182266 ; NAKHNIKIAN G, 1957, PHILOS REV, P541; PASSMORE JA, 1952, HUMES INTENTIONS, P27; RYLE G, 1933, ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V12, P27; STRAWSON, 1954, PHILOS REV, P229; STRAWSON PF, 1956, ESSAYS CONCEPTUAL AN, P35; STRAWSON PF, 1952, INTRO LOGICAL THEORY, P190","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","CCP53","WOS:A1962CCP5300002",,,,,"2018-01-02",250.0,"carnapr hume humed humed humed kant malcolmn nakhnikiang passmoreja ryleg strawson strawsonpf strawsonpf broadcd","cluster_0"
-0.6476843711584678,-0.5674393088567339,31.0,20.0,20.0,0.0,3.0,2013.0,122.0,486.0,451.0,480.0,30.0,"J","Tugby, M",,,,"Tugby, Matthew",,,"Platonic Dispositionalism","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"In this paper I argue that if one subscribes to dispositionalism - the view that natural properties are irreducibly dispositional in character - then one ought to favour a Platonic view of properties. That is, dispositionalists ought to view properties as transcendent universals. I argue for this on the grounds that only with transcendent universals in play can two central dispositionalist platitudes be accounted for in a satisfactory way. Given that dispositionalism is becoming an increasingly influential view in the metaphysics of science, my argument, if successful, suggests that Platonism will see something of a revival in contemporary metaphysics. This new kind of Platonism is shown to have some striking metaphysical and epistemological consequences.","Univ Durham, Durham DH1 3HP, England","Tugby, M (reprint author), Univ Durham, Durham DH1 3HP, England.","mwtugby@gmail.com",,,,,"Armstrong D. M., 1983, WHAT IS A LAW OF NAT; ARMSTRONG DM, 1978, THEORY UNIVERSALS, V2; Armstrong D.M., 1997, WORLD STATES AFFAIRS; Campbell Keith, 1993, ONTOLOGY CAUSALITY A; Bird A, 2006, SYNTHESE, V149, P491, DOI 10.1007/s11229-005-0574-4; Bird Alexander, 2007, NATURES METAPHYSICS; Bird Alexander, 2012, PROPERTIES POWERS AN; BraddonMitchell D, 2009, CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS AND PHILOSOPHICAL NATURALISM, P1; Denby DA, 2006, MIND, V115, P1, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzl001; Ellis B., 2002, THE PHILOSOPHY OF NA; Ellis B., 2001, SCIENTIFIC ESSENTIAL; Fales Evan, 1990, CAUSATION AND UNIVER; Handfield Toby, 2009, DISPOSITIONS AND CAU; Handfield T, 2008, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V86, P113, DOI 10.1080/00048400701846608; Heil John, 2003, FROM AN ONTOLOGICAL; Langton R, 1998, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V58, P333, DOI 10.2307/2653512 ; Lewis D., 1973, COUNTERFACTUALS; Lewis D., 1986, ON THE PLURALITY OF; Lowe E. J., 2009, MORE KINDS OF BEING; Lowe E. J., 2006, THE FOUR CATEGORY ON; McKitrick J, 2003, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V81, P155, DOI 10.1080/713659629 ; McKitrick Jennifer, 2008, THE MIND IN NATURE; Molnar G., 2003, POWERS A STUDY IN ME; Mumford S, 1999, PHILOS QUART, V49, P215, DOI 10.1111/1467-9213.00138 ; Mumford S., 2004, LAWS NATURE; Popper K., 1959, THE LOGIC OF SCIENTI; Schaffer J, 2010, MIND, V119, P341, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzq033; TOOLEY M, 1977, CAN J PHILOS, V7, P667; Tugby M, 2012, ANALYSIS-UK, V72, P723, DOI 10.1093/analys/ans112; van Inwagen, 1980, TIME AND CAUSE; Whittle A, 2008, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V77, P59, DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2008.00176.x","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423","1460-2113",,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzt071",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","263FV","WOS:000327793300004",,,,,"2018-01-02",251.0,"armstrongdm armstrongdm campbellkeith birda birdalexander birdalexander braddonmitchelld denbyda ellisb ellisb falesevan handfieldtoby handfieldt heiljohn langtonr lewisd lewisd loweej loweej mckitrickj mckitrickjennifer molnarg mumfords mumfords popperk schafferj tooleym tugbym vaninwagen whittlea armstrongdm","cluster_3"
-0.3507513124930489,-0.37893307422088646,58.0,20.0,21.0,0.0,2.0,2009.0,118.0,471.0,583.0,646.0,64.0,"J","Kennedy, C; Stanley, J",,,,"Kennedy, Christopher; Stanley, Jason",,,"On 'Average'","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"RELATIVE CLAUSES; NATURAL-LANGUAGE; QUANTIFIERS; RECONSTRUCTION; PRONOUNS","This article investigates the semantics of sentences that express numerical averages, focusing initially on cases such as 'The average American has 2.3 children'. Such sentences have been used both by linguists and philosophers to argue for a disjuncture between semantics and ontology. For example, Noam Chomsky and Norbert Hornstein have used them to provide evidence against the hypothesis that natural language semantics includes a reference relation holding between words and objects in the world, whereas metaphysicians such as Joseph Melia and Stephen Yablo have used them to provide evidence that apparent singular reference need not be taken as ontologically committing. We develop a fully general and independently justified compositional semantics in which such constructions are assigned truth conditions that are not ontologically problematic, and show that our analysis is superior to all extant rivals. Our analysis provides evidence that a good semantics yields a sensible ontology. It also reveals that natural language contains genuine singular terms that refer to numbers.","[Kennedy, Christopher] Univ Chicago, Dept Linguist, Chicago, IL 60637 USA; [Stanley, Jason] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Philosophy, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA","Kennedy, C (reprint author), Univ Chicago, Dept Linguist, 1010 E 59th St, Chicago, IL 60637 USA.","ck@uchicago.edu; jasoncs@ruccs.rutgers.edu",,,,,"Abney Steven, 1987, THESIS MIT CAMBRIDGE; Barker C, 2007, LINGUIST PHILOS, V30, P407, DOI 10.1007/s10988-007-9021-y; BARTSCH R, 1989, SEMANTICS CONTEXTUAL; BARWISE J, 1981, LINGUIST PHILOS, V4, P159, DOI 10.1007/BF00350139 ; BAUERLE R, 1983, ALEANING USE INTERPR; Bresnan Joan, 1973, LINGUIST INQ, V4, P275; Carlson G., 2002, J SEMANT, V19, P73; CARPENTER B, 1997, TYPE LOGICAL SEMANTI; Chierchia Gennaro, 1990, MEANING GRAMMAR INTR; Chomsky N., 1957, SYNTACTIC STRUCTURES; Chomsky N., 2000, NEW HORIZONS STUDY L; Chomsky Noam, 1955, LOGICAL STRUCTURE LI; CORUM C, 1973, P 9 ANN M CHIC LING; CULICOVER P, 1977, FORMAL SYNTAX, P71; Dummett Michel, 1991, FREGE PHILOS MATH; DUNCAN E, 1992, P 11 W COAST C FORM; Elbourne PD, 2005, CURR STUD LINGUIST, P1; ELLIOTT M, 2007, 43 ANN M CHIC LING S, V1; EVANS G, 1977, CAN J PHILOS, V7, P777; EVANS G, 1977, CAN J PHILOS, V7, P467; Fox D, 1999, LINGUIST INQ, V30, P157, DOI 10.1162/002438999554020 ; Frege G., 1884, FDN ARITHMETIC; GIBSON M, 2007, P SALT ITH NY CLE PU, V17; Heim I., 1985, NOTES COMP RELATED M; Heim I, 1998, SEMANTICS GENERATIVE; HEYCOCK C, 1995, LINGUIST INQ, V26, P547; HIGGINBOTHAM J, 1985, LINGUIST INQ, V16, P547; HODES HT, 1984, J PHILOS, V81, P123, DOI 10.2307/2026440 ; HOEKSEMA J, 1983, NAT LANG LINGUIST TH, V1, P403, DOI 10.1007/BF00142472 ; HOFIVEBER T, PHILOS IMPRINT, V7; HOFIVEBER T, 2005, PHILOS REV, V114, P179; HORNSTEIN N, 1984, LOGIC GRAMMAR; KEENAN EL, 1986, LINGUIST PHILOS, V9, P253, DOI 10.1007/BF00630273 ; Kennedy C, 2002, NAT LANG LINGUIST TH, V20, P553, DOI 10.1023/A:1015889823361 ; KENNEDY C, 2008, SALT 18 AMH U MASS 2; Kennedy Christopher, 1999, THESIS UCSC NEW YORK; KRIFKA M, 1990, LINGUIST PHILOS, V13, P487; Kripke Saul Aaron, 1982, WITTGENSTEIN RULES P; Larson Richard, 1995, KNOWLEDGE MEANING IN; Lechner W, 2001, NAT LANG LINGUIST TH, V19, P683, DOI 10.1023/A:1013378908052 ; Link Godehard, 1998, ALGEBRAIC SEMANTICS; Ludlow P., 1999, SEMANTICS TENSE TIME; MEGERDOOMIAN K, 2001, P WCCFL, V20, P234; MELIA J, 1995, ANALYSIS, V55, P223, DOI 10.2307/3328390 ; MOLTMANN F, 2008, REFERENCE NUMB UNPUB; Montague Richard, 1974, R MONTAGUE SELECTED, P247; Neale S., 1990, DESCRIPTIONS; PARTEE B, 1977, MONTAGUE GRAMMAR, P261; Quine Willard Van Orman, 1960, WORD OBJECT; Ross J. R., 1967, THESIS MIT CAMBRIDGE; Salmon N., 1997, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V11, P1; SAUERLAND U, 1998, INTERPRETIVE TRACT M, V25; SAYRE WS, 1932, AM POLIT SCI REV, V26, P360; Stanley J., 2001, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, VXXV, P36; STROLOVITCH D, 1998, P SALT, V8; STUMP GT, 1981, LINGUIST PHILOS, V4, P221, DOI 10.1007/BF00350140 ; VONSTECHOW A, 1991, SEMANTIK NTERNATIONA; Yablo S., 1998, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V72, P229, DOI DOI 10.1111/1467-8349.00044","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423","1460-2113",,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzp094",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","518UE","WOS:000271719000002",,,,,"2018-01-02",252.0,"barkerc bartschr barwisej bauerler bresnanjoan carlsong carpenterb chierchiagennaro chomskyn chomskyn chomskynoam corumc culicoverp dummettmichel duncane elbournepd elliottm evansg evansg foxd fregeg gibsonm heimi heimi heycockc higginbothamj hodesht hoeksemaj hofivebert hofivebert hornsteinn keenanel kennedyc kennedyc kennedychristopher krifkam kripkesaulaaron larsonrichard lechnerw linkgodehard ludlowp megerdoomiank meliaj moltmannf montaguerichard neales parteeb quinewillardvanorman rossjr salmonn sauerlandu sayrews stanleyj strolovitchd stumpgt vonstechowa yablos abneysteven","cluster_0"
-0.891925262351153,-0.7167441570897776,27.0,20.0,20.0,0.0,0.0,2005.0,114.0,455.0,481.0,508.0,28.0,"J","Hellie, B",,,,"Hellie, B",,,"Noise and perceptual indiscriminability","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"Cornell Univ, Sage Sch Philosophy, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA","Hellie, B (reprint author), Cornell Univ, Sage Sch Philosophy, 218 Goldwin Smith Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA.","benj.hellie@cornell.edu",,,,,"ARMSTRONG DM, 1968, MATERIALIST THEORY M; Bruce V., 1985, VISUAL PERCEPTION PH; DUMMETT MAE, 1975, SYNTHESE, V30, P201; Evans G., 1982, VARIETIES REFERENCE; FIELD H, 1994, MIND, V103, P249, DOI 10.1093/mind/103.411.249 ; Fodor J., 1990, THEORY CONTENT OTHER; Goodman Nelson, 1951, STRUCTURE APPEARANCE; Graff D, 2001, MIND, V110, P905, DOI 10.1093/mind/110.440.905 ; Hardin C. L., 1988, COLOR PHILOS UNWEAVI; Harman G., 1990, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V4, P31, DOI DOI 10.2307/2214186; Hecht H, 2003, LOOKING PICTURES; Jackson Frank, 1977, PERCEPTION REPRESENT; Jackson Frank, 1973, MIND, V82, P269; Levine M., 1991, FUNDAMENTALS SENSATI; LEWIS D, 1996, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V74, P418; LEWIS H, 1976, CONT BRIT PHILOS; Mills E, 2002, NOUS, V36, P384, DOI 10.1111/1468-0068.00377 ; Moore George Edward, 1903, MIND, V12, P433, DOI DOI 10.1093/MIND/XII.4.433; Pryor J, 2000, NOUS, V34, P517, DOI 10.1111/0029-4624.00277 ; Raffman D., 2000, PHILOS TOPICS, V28, P153, DOI DOI 10.5840/PHILT0PICS200028118; SHOEMAKER S, 1994, NOUS, V28, P21, DOI 10.2307/2215918 ; STRAWSON PF, 1976, ENTITY IDENTITY, P21; Swets J. A., 1964, SIGNAL DETECTION REC; WILLIAMSON T, 1995, MIND, V104, P533, DOI 10.1093/mind/104.415.533 ; Williamson T., 1990, IDENTITY DISCRIMINAT; Williamson T., 1994, VAGUENESS; Wright Crispin, 1975, SYNTHESE, V30, P325, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00485049","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzi481",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","952WY","WOS:000231037900001",,,,,"2018-01-02",253.0,"brucev dummettmae evansg fieldh fodorj goodmannelson graffd hardincl harmang hechth jacksonfrank jacksonfrank levinem lewisd lewish millse mooregeorgeedward pryorj raffmand shoemakers strawsonpf swetsja williamsont williamsont williamsont wrightcrispin armstrongdm","cluster_3"
-0.7030225807768242,-0.44872587436244554,25.0,20.0,20.0,0.0,1.0,1998.0,107.0,426.0,275.0,303.0,29.0,"J","Brown, J",,,,"Brown, J",,,"Natural kind terms and recognitional capacities (Kripke, Putnam, philosophy of language and mind)","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"Univ Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TH, Avon, England","Brown, J (reprint author), Univ Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TH, Avon, England.",,,,,,"Abbott B, 1997, MIND, V106, P313; Burge T., 1982, THOUGHT OBJECT, P97; DETSKE F, 1981, KNOWLEDGE FLOW INFO; DEVLIN M, 1987, LANGUAGE REALITY; DUPRE J, 1981, PHILOS REV, V90, P66, DOI 10.2307/2184373 ; Evans G., 1982, VARIETIES REFERENCE; Fodor J., 1990, THEORY CONTENT; GOLDMAN AI, 1976, J PHILOS, V73, P771, DOI 10.2307/2025679 ; KRIPKE S., 1980, NAMING NECESSITY; LIDE DR, 1990, HDB CHEM PHYSICS; Locke John, ESSAY HUMAN UNDERSTA; McGinn C., 1989, MENTAL CONTENT; MELLOR DH, 1977, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V28, P299, DOI 10.1093/bjps/28.4.299 ; MILLER RB, 1992, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V70, P425, DOI 10.1080/00048409212345301 ; NOZICK R, 1981, PHILOS EXPLANATIONS; Papineau D., 1979, THEORY MEANING; PLATTS M, 1983, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V34, P133, DOI 10.1093/bjps/34.2.133 ; Putnam H., 1975, MIND LANGUAGE REALIT; Putnam Hilary, 1970, LANGUAGES BELIEF MET; Putnam H., 1975, LANGUAGE MIND KNOWLE; Putnam H., 1973, CONCEPTUAL CHANGE; STERELNY K, 1983, PAC PHILOS QUART, V64, P110; Wiggins D., 1980, SAMENESS SUBSTANCE; Woodfield Andrew, 1982, THOUGHT AND OBJECT; ZEMACH EM, 1976, J PHILOS, V73, P116, DOI 10.2307/2025740","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/107.426.275",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","ZJ895","WOS:000073264500001",,,,,"2018-01-02",254.0,"burget detskef devlinm duprej evansg fodorj goldmanai kripkes lidedr lockejohn mcginnc mellordh millerrb nozickr papineaud plattsm putnamh putnamhilary putnamh putnamh sterelnyk wigginsd woodfieldandrew zemachem abbottb","cluster_0"
-0.2576873280496036,-0.1726692963600831,37.0,20.0,20.0,0.0,1.0,1996.0,105.0,418.0,227.0,248.0,22.0,"J","DOWE, P",,,,"DOWE, P",,,"BACKWARDS CAUSATION AND THE DIRECTION OF CAUSAL PROCESSES","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"BELL THEOREM; AGENCY; TIME",,,"DOWE, P (reprint author), UNIV TASMANIA,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,HOBART,TAS 7001,AUSTRALIA.",,,,,,"ARNTZENIUS F, 1990, SYNTHESE, V82, P77, DOI 10.1007/BF00413670 ; BELINFANTE F, SURVEY HIDDEN-VARIAB; COSTADEBEAUREGARD O, 1977, NUOVO CIMENTO B, V42, P41; CRAMER JG, 1988, INT J THEOR PHYS, V27, P227, DOI 10.1007/BF00670751 ; CRAMER JG, 1986, REV MOD PHYS, V58, P647, DOI 10.1103/RevModPhys.58.647; DAVIDON WC, 1976, NUOVO CIMENTO B, V36, P34, DOI 10.1007/BF02749419; DOWE P, 1992, PHILOS SCI, V59, P195, DOI 10.1086/289662 ; DOWE P, 1995, PHILOS SCI, V62, P321, DOI 10.1086/289859 ; DOWE P, 1993, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V44, P325, DOI 10.1093/bjps/44.2.325 ; DOWE P, 1993, FOUND PHYS LETT, V6, P469, DOI 10.1007/BF00682793 ; Dowe P., 1992, ERKENNTNIS, V37, P179; Dowe Phil, 1995, ERKENNTNIS, V42, P363; EARMAN J, 1976, J PHILOS, V73, P5, DOI 10.2307/2025447 ; Gasking D., 1955, MIND, V64, P479, DOI DOI 10.1093/MIND/LXIV.256.479; HAUSMAN DM, 1984, NOUS, V18, P261, DOI 10.2307/2215163 ; HORWITZ LP, 1988, FOUND PHYS, V18, P1159, DOI 10.1007/BF01889430; HULL D, 1993, PSA 1992, V2; Hume David, 1739, TREATISE HUMAN NATUR; MENZIES P, 1993, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V44, P187, DOI 10.1093/bjps/44.2.187 ; Papineau D., 1993, PSA 1992, V2, P238; PRICE H, 1994, MIND, V103, P303, DOI 10.1093/mind/103.411.303 ; PRICE H, 1992, MIND, V101, P501, DOI 10.1093/mind/101.403.501 ; PRICE H, 1991, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V42, P157, DOI 10.1093/bjps/42.2.157 ; Price H., 1993, PSA 1992, V2, P253; REICHENBACH H, DIRECTION TIME; RUSSELL B, HUMAN KNOWLEDGE ITS; SALMON WC, 1994, PHILOS SCI, V61, P297, DOI 10.1086/289801; SALMON WC, SCI EXPLANATION CAUS; SMART JJC, PHILOS SCI REALISM; Sosa E., 1993, CAUSATION; Stapp H., 1975, NUOVO CIMENTO B, V29, P271; SUTHERLAND RI, 1983, INT J THEOR PHYS, V22, P377, DOI 10.1007/BF02082904 ; SUTHERLAND RI, 1985, NUOVO CIM B, V88, P114, DOI 10.1007/BF02728894; TOOLEY M, CAUSATION REALIST AP; TOOLEY M, 1993, CAUSATION, P1; VANFRAASSEN BC, LAWS SYMMETRY; VONWRIGHT GH, EXPLANATION UNDERSTA","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/105.418.227",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","UG797","WOS:A1996UG79700002",,,,,"2018-01-02",255.0,"belinfantef costadebeauregardo cramerjg cramerjg davidonwc dowep dowep dowep dowep dowep dowephil earmanj gaskingd hausmandm horwitzlp hulld humedavid menziesp papineaud priceh priceh priceh priceh reichenbachh russellb salmonwc salmonwc smartjjc sosae stapph sutherlandri sutherlandri tooleym tooleym vanfraassenbc vonwrightgh arntzeniusf","cluster_0"
-0.5983599243621348,-0.4315964776340185,13.0,20.0,20.0,0.0,0.0,1995.0,104.0,414.0,331.0,354.0,24.0,"J","BENNETT, J",,,,"BENNETT, J",,,"CLASSIFYING CONDITIONALS - THE TRADITIONAL WAY IS RIGHT","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"BENNETT, J (reprint author), SYRACUSE UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,SYRACUSE,NY 13244, USA.",,,,,,"Adams E., 1975, LOGIC CONDITIONALS; BENNETT J, 1988, MIND, V97, P509; BENNETT J, 1984, PHILOS REV, V93, P57, DOI 10.2307/2184413 ; Blackburn S. W., 1986, MEANING INTERPRETATI, P201; DUDMAN VH, 1989, MIND, V98, P591; DUDMAN VH, 1984, ANALYSIS, V44, P145, DOI 10.2307/3327374 ; DUDMAN VH, 1983, AUSTR J LINGUISTICS, P25; DUDMAN VH, 1981, TENSE TIME ENGLISH; Edgington Dorothy, 1991, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V65, P185; JACKSON F, 1990, ANALYSIS, V50, P134, DOI 10.2307/3328856 ; Jackson F., 1987, CONDITIONALS; LEWIS D, 1976, CONDITIONALS, V85, P297; RAMSEY FP, 1978, FOUNDATIONS, P128","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/104.414.331",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","QX948","WOS:A1995QX94800002",,,,,"2018-01-02",256.0,"bennettj bennettj blackburnsw dudmanvh dudmanvh dudmanvh dudmanvh edgingtondorothy jacksonf jacksonf lewisd ramseyfp adamse","cluster_3"
-0.6737206052263806,0.8860111914827837,23.0,20.0,20.0,1.0,4.0,1993.0,102.0,405.0,101.0,122.0,22.0,"J","SOSA, D",,,,"SOSA, D",,,"CONSEQUENCES OF CONSEQUENTIALISM","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"SOSA, D (reprint author), PRINCETON UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,PRINCETON,NJ 08544, USA.",,,,,,"ANSCOMBE GEM, 1958, PHILOSOPHY, V33, P1, DOI 10.1017/S0031819100037943 ; BALES RE, 1971, AM PHILOS QUART, V8, P257; BODANSZKY E, 1981, ANALYSIS, V41, P51, DOI 10.2307/3327873 ; CHISHOLM RM, 1981, ANALYSIS, V41, P99, DOI 10.2307/3327241 ; Feldman F., 1986, DOING BEST WE CAN; JACKSON F, 1991, ETHICS, V101, P461, DOI 10.1086/293312 ; KAGAN S, 1988, ETHICS, V99, P5, DOI 10.1086/293033 ; Kim J., 1973, J PHILOS, V70, P570; LANGENFUS WL, 1990, AM PHILOS QUART, V27, P131; Moore G. E., 1912, ETHICS; Moore G. E., 1922, PHILOS STUDIES; MOORE G. E, 1903, PRINCIPIA ETHICA; NAGEL T, 1980, TANNER LECTURES HUMA; NOZICK R, 1981, PHILOS EXPLANATIONS; Parfit D., 1984, REASONS PERSONS; RAILTON P, 1988, PHILOS PUBLIC AFF, V13, P2; Scheffler Samuel, 1982, REJECTION CONSEQUENT; Scheffler S., 1988, CONSEQUENTIALISM ITS, P1; Sen A., 1988, CONSEQUENTIALISM ITS, P187; Slote M., 1985, COMMONSENSE MORALITY; STOCKER M, 1976, J PHILOS, V73, P453, DOI 10.2307/2025782 ; THOMSON JUDITH JARVIS, 1986, RIGHTS RESTITUTION R, V78; Williams B., 1973, UTILITARIANISM, P75","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/102.405.101",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","KK060","WOS:A1993KK06000005",,,,,"2018-01-02",257.0,"balesre bodanszkye chisholmrm feldmanf jacksonf kagans kimj langenfuswl moorege moorege moorege nagelt nozickr parfitd railtonp schefflersamuel schefflers sena slotem stockerm thomsonjudithjarvis williamsb anscombegem","cluster_6"
-0.7052484228471289,1.6188325212238268,33.0,20.0,20.0,0.0,3.0,1990.0,99.0,393.0,67.0,77.0,11.0,"J","HOOKER, B",,,,"HOOKER, B",,,"RULE-CONSEQUENTIALISM","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"HOOKER, B (reprint author), VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,915 W FRANKLIN ST,RICHMOND,VA 23284, USA.",,,"Hooker, Brad/0000-0003-1164-6328",,,"ADAM RM, 1976, J PHILOS, P480; ARTHUR J, 1989, APPLYING ETHICS, P362; BAIER K, 1958, MORAL POINT VIEW, P203; BLACKBURN S, 1985, MORALITY OBJECTIVITY, P21; BRANDT, 1983, ETHICAL THEORY LAST, P99; BRANDT R, 1988, ETHICS, P341; BRANDT RB, 1979, THEORY GOOD RIGHT, P276; BROCK D, 1982, LIMITS UTILITARIANIS; DANIELS N, 1983, ETHICS, P778; DONAGAN A, 1968, CONT UTILITARIANISM, P187; FELDMAN F, 1978, INTRO ETHICS, pCH4; FISHKIN J, LIMITS OBLIGATION; Griffin J., 1986, WELL BEING; HARE RM, 1981, MORAL THINKING ITS L, P35; HARMAN G, 1977, NATURE MORALITY INTR, P157; HOSPERS J, 1982, HUMAN CONDUCT PROBLE, P162; HOSPERS J, 1972, HUMAN CONDUCT PROBLE, P314; JOHNSON C, CONSEQUENTIALISM ITS, P264; KAGAN S, 1984, PHILOS PUBLIC AFF, P239; MACKIE JL, 1977, ETHICS INVENTING RIG, P133; NAGEL T, 1986, VIEW NOWHERE, pCH10; PARFIT D, 1984, REASONS PERSONS, P30; RAILTON P, 1984, PHILOS PUBLIC AFF, V13, P134; RAWLS JOHN, 1971, THEORY JUSTICE, P130; Ross W. D., 1930, RIGHT GOOD; SCANLON T. M., 1978, PUBLIC PRIVATE MORAL, P93; SCHEFFLER, 1986, J PHILOS, P531; SCHEFFLER, 1982, REJECTION CONSEQUENT, P26; SCHEFFLER S, 1988, CONSEQUENTIALISM ITS, P2; SIDGWICK H, 1907, METHODS ETHICS, pCH3; SINGER P, 1979, PRACTICAL ETHICS, P163; WILLIAMS B, 1973, UTILITARIANISM, P121; WILLIAMS B, 1985, ETHICS LIMITS PHILOS, P77","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","CL170","WOS:A1990CL17000005",,,,,"2018-01-02",258.0,"arthurj baierk blackburns brandt brandtr brandtrb brockd danielsn donagana feldmanf fishkinj griffinj harerm harmang hospersj hospersj johnsonc kagans mackiejl nagelt parfitd railtonp rawlsjohn rosswd scanlontm scheffler scheffler schefflers sidgwickh singerp williamsb williamsb adamrm","cluster_6"
-0.3310631795995621,-0.3934001077292769,23.0,20.0,20.0,0.0,0.0,1989.0,98.0,389.0,1.0,21.0,21.0,"J","MCDONOUGH, R",,,,"MCDONOUGH, R",,,"TOWARDS A NON-MECHANISTIC THEORY OF MEANING","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"MCDONOUGH, R (reprint author), NATL UNIV SINGAPORE,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,KENT RIDGE,SINGAPORE 0511,SINGAPORE.",,,,,,"DENNETT D, 1982, THOUGHT OBJECT, P25; DENNETT D, 1981, BRAINSTORMS, P154; DUMMETT M, 1967, PHILOS LOGIC, P64; DUMMETT M, 1975, LANG MIND, P121; FODOR, 1985, MIND, P93; FODOR, 1968, PSYCHOL EXPLANATION, P121; FODOR J, 1964, STRUCTURE LANGUAGE, P496; FODOR JA, 1979, LANGUAGE THOUGHT, P82; FODOR JA, 1981, REPRESENTATIONS PHIL, P23; GOLDBERG B, 1968, PHILOS REV; GOLDBERG B, 1983, KNOWLEDGE MIND, P202; MCDONOUGH RM, 1986, ARGUMENT TRACTATUS I, P168; MCGINN, 1980, REFERENCE TRUTH REAL; McGinn C., 1984, WITTGENSTEIN MEANING; MCGINN C, 1982, THOUGHT OBJECT, P227; PUTNAM H, 1975, MIND LANGUAGE REALIT, V2, P144; Searle John, 1983, INTENTIONALITY, P150; Kaal H., 1958, BLUE BROWN BOOKS; WITTGENSTEIN L, 1966, TRACTATUS LOGICO-PHI; WITTGENSTEIN L, 1974, PHILOS REMARKS; Wittgenstein Ludwig, 1974, PHILOS GRAMMAR; Wittgenstein L., 1958, PHILOS INVESTIGATION; Wittgenstein Ludwig, 1967, ZETTEL","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","T2314","WOS:A1989T231400001",,,,,"2018-01-02",259.0,"dennettd dummettm dummettm fodor fodor fodorj fodorja fodorja goldbergb goldbergb mcdonoughrm mcginn mcginnc mcginnc putnamh searlejohn kaalh wittgensteinl wittgensteinl wittgensteinludwig wittgensteinl wittgensteinludwig dennettd","cluster_0"
-0.07227835020074613,0.008523094099405992,11.0,20.0,20.0,0.0,0.0,1987.0,96.0,383.0,331.0,340.0,10.0,"J","HACKING, I",,,,"HACKING, I",,,"THE INVERSE GAMBLERS FALLACY, THE ARGUMENT FROM DESIGN, THE ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE APPLIED TO WHEELER UNIVERSES","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"ANDERSON AR, 1969, ESSAYS HONOR CG HEMP; BOLTZMANN L, 1897, ANN PHYSIK, P392; CARTER B, CONFRONTATION COSMOL; COLLINS CB, 1973, ASTROPHYS J; DAVIES P, 1983, ACCIDENTAL UNIVERSE; HARMAN G, 1966, PHILOS REV, P241; Jeffner Andres, 1966, BUTLER HUME RELIG CO; LESLIE J, 1982, AM PHILOS QUART, V19, P141; Misner C.W., 1973, GRAVITATION; RESCHER N, 1983, SCI EXPLANATION UNDE; ROBSON J, ORIGIN EVOLUTION UNI","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","J6286","WOS:A1987J628600003",,,,,"2018-01-02",260.0,"boltzmannl carterb collinscb daviesp harmang jeffnerandres lesliej misnercw reschern robsonj andersonar","cluster_0"
-0.16776549666639765,-0.057430390467409324,18.0,20.0,20.0,0.0,0.0,1980.0,89.0,355.0,391.0,405.0,15.0,"J","BURKE, MB",,,,"BURKE, MB",,,"COHABITATION, STUFF AND INTERMITTENT EXISTENCE","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"BURKE, MB (reprint author), INDIANA UNIV,BLOOMINGTON,IN 47401, USA.",,,,,,"BOROWSKI EJ, 1975, PHILOSOPHICAL Q; COBURN R, 1971, IDENTITY INDIVIDUATI; ENC B, 1975, MIND, V84, P19; ENC B, 1975, MIND, V84; GEACH P, 1967, REV METAPHYSICS, VXXI; HIRSCH E, 1976, PHILOSOPHICAL REV, V85, P371; HOBBES T, 1917, METAPHYSICAL SYSTEM; LAYCOCK H, 1971, PHILOS REV, V81, P28; LAYCOCK H, 1971, PHILOSOPHICAL REV, V81, P27; NOONAN H, 1976, MIND, V85; PERRY J, 1970, PHILOSOPHICAL REV, V39, P198; PRICE M, 1977, J PHILOSOPHY, V74, P211; SHOEMAKER S, 1971, IDENTITY INDIVIDUATI; SMART B, 1973, ANALYSIS, V34, P25; STEVENSON L, 1972, PHILOSOPHICAL Q, V22; WIGGINS D, 1968, PHILOSOPHICAL REV, V77; WIGGINS D, 1968, PHILOSOPHICAL REV, V77, P91; Wiggins D, 1967, IDENTITY SPATIO TEMP","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","KF685","WOS:A1980KF68500005",,,,,"2018-01-02",261.0,"coburnr encb encb geachp hirsche hobbest laycockh laycockh noonanh perryj pricem shoemakers smartb stevensonl wigginsd wigginsd wigginsd borowskiej","cluster_0"
-0.04443539275243492,-0.05209735115885749,4.0,20.0,20.0,0.0,0.0,1958.0,67.0,267.0,382.0,384.0,3.0,"J","SHAW, R",,,,"SHAW, R",,,"THE PARADOX OF THE UNEXPECTED EXAMINATION","MIND",,,"English","Discussion",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"ALEXANDER P, 1951, MIND, P538; QUINE WV, 1953, MIND, P65; SCRIVEN M, 1951, MIND, P403; WEISS P, 1952, MIND, P265","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","CCP45","WOS:A1958CCP4500008",,,,,"2018-01-02",263.0,"quinewv scrivenm weissp alexanderp","cluster_0"
-0.063281224548334,0.17359673062979,24.0,19.0,20.0,0.0,4.0,2011.0,120.0,477.0,83.0,115.0,33.0,"J","Okasha, S",,,,"Okasha, Samir",,,"Theory Choice and Social Choice: Kuhn versus Arrow","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"Kuhn's famous thesis that there is 'no unique algorithm' for choosing between rival scientific theories is analysed using the machinery of social choice theory. It is shown that the problem of theory choice as posed by Kuhn is formally identical to a standard social choice problem. This suggests that analogues of well-known results from the social choice literature, such as Arrow's impossibility theorem, may apply to theory choice. If an analogue of Arrow's theorem does hold for theory choice this would refute Kuhn's thesis, but it would also pose a threat to the rationality of science, a threat that is if anything more worrying than that posed by Kuhn. Various possible 'escape routes' from Arrow's impossibility result are examined, in particular Amartya Sen's idea of 'enriching the informational basis'. It is shown that Sen's idea can be applied to the problem of theory choice in science. This in turn sheds light on two well-known approaches to inductive inference in philosophy of science: Bayesianism and statistical model selection.","Univ Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TH, Avon, England","Okasha, S (reprint author), Univ Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TH, Avon, England.","samir.okasha@bristol.ac.uk",,,,,"Arrow K. J., 1951, SOCIAL CHOICE INDIVI; Arrow K.J., 1986, HDB MATH EC; AUSTEN-SMITH D., 1999, POSITIVE POLITICAL T; BARBERA S, 2004, HDB UTILITY THEORY, V2; Earman J., 1992, BAYES BUST; Elster Jon, 1991, INTERPERSONAL COMP W; FISHBURN PC, 1987, INTERPROFILE CONDITI; FLEURBAEY M, 2008, JUSTICE POLITICAL LI; FORSTER M, 1994, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V45, P1, DOI 10.1093/bjps/45.1.1 ; Gaertner W., 2006, PRIMER SOCIAL CHOICE; Horwich P., 1993, WORLD CHANGES T KUHN; Howson C., 1992, SCI REASONING BAYESI; KELSEY D, 1987, OXFORD ECON PAP, V39, P301, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041788 ; Kuhn T., 1977, ESSENTIAL TENSION; KUHN Th. S., 1969, STRUCTURE SCI REVOLU; LIPTON P, 1990, INFERENCE BEST EXPLA; Newton-smith W, 1981, RATIONALITY SCI; ROEMER J, 1997, THEORIES DISTRIBUTIV; SEN A, 1969, REV ECON STUD, V36, P381, DOI 10.2307/2296434 ; SEN A, 1977, ECONOMETRICA, V45, P1539, DOI 10.2307/1913949 ; Sen A. K., 1970, COLLECTIVE CHOICE SO; THAGARD PR, 1978, J PHILOS, V75, P76, DOI 10.2307/2025686 ; Tsui KY, 1997, ECON THEORY, V10, P241, DOI 10.1007/s001990050156 ; Zellner A, 2001, SIMPLICITY INFERENCE","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzr010",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","780XE","WOS:000291893400004",,,,,"2018-01-02",264.0,"arrowkj austensmithd barberas earmanj elsterjon fishburnpc fleurbaeym forsterm gaertnerw horwichp howsonc kelseyd kuhnt kuhnths liptonp newtonsmithw roemerj sena sena senak thagardpr tsuiky zellnera arrowkj","cluster_4"
-0.20992072163531433,0.3234700478300126,13.0,19.0,19.0,0.0,0.0,2010.0,119.0,473.0,83.0,102.0,20.0,"J","Nelson, MT",,,,"Nelson, Mark T.",,,"We Have No Positive Epistemic Duties","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"In ethics, it is commonly supposed that we have both positive duties and negative duties, things we ought to do and things we ought not to do. Given the many parallels between ethics and epistemology, we might suppose that the same is true in epistemology, and that we have both positive epistemic duties and negative epistemic duties. I argue that this is false; that is, that we have negative epistemic duties, but no positive ones. There are things that we ought not to believe, but there is nothing that we ought to believe, on purely epistemic grounds. I also consider why the parallels between ethics and epistemology break down at this particular point, suggesting that it is due to what I call the infinite justificational 'fecundity' of perceptual and propositional evidence.","Westmont Coll, Santa Barbara, CA USA","Nelson, MT (reprint author), Westmont Coll, Santa Barbara, CA USA.","manelson@westmont.edu",,,,,"ALSTON W.P, 1993, RELIABILITY SENSE PE; Audi R., 2001, ARCHITECTURE REASON; BLACK R, 1990, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V90, P65; BONJOUR L., 1985, STRUCTURE EMPIRICAL; DANCY J, 1982, PHILOS STUD, V42, P395, DOI 10.1007/BF00714370 ; Engel P, 2005, PHILOS EXPLORATIONS, V8, P21; Nelson MT, 2002, INT J PHILOS STUD, V10, P265, DOI 10.1080/09672550210152113 ; Nelson MT, 2001, PHILOSOPHY, V76, P283; Ross W. D., 1930, RIGHT GOOD; Smith M., 1994, MORAL PROBLEM; Tolhurst W, 1998, AM PHILOS QUART, V35, P293; Williams B, 1985, ETHICS LIMITS PHILOS; Williams B., 1965, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V39, P103, DOI DOI 10.1093/ARISTOTELIANSUPP/39.1.103","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzp148",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","605BP","WOS:000278322600003",,,,,"2018-01-02",265.0,"audir blackr bonjourl dancyj engelp nelsonmt nelsonmt rosswd smithm tolhurstw williamsb williamsb alstonwp","cluster_6"
-0.28238563396163435,-0.05410658193440455,58.0,19.0,19.0,1.0,2.0,2009.0,118.0,471.0,647.0,712.0,66.0,"J","Millican, P",,,,"Millican, Peter",,,"Hume, Causal Realism, and Causal Science","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"The 'New Hume' interpretation, which sees Hume as a realist about 'thick' Causal powers, has been largely motivated by his evident commitment to causal language and causal science. In this, however, it is fundamentally misguided, failing to recognise how Hume exploits his anti-realist conclusions about (upper-case) Causation precisely to support (lower-case) causal science. When critically examined, none of the standard New Humean arguments-familiar from the work of Wright, Craig, Strawson, Buckle, Kail, and others-retains any significant force against the plain evidence of Hume's texts. But the most devastating objection comes from Hume's own applications of his analysis of causation, to the questions of 'the immateriality of the soul' and 'liberty and necessity'. These show that the New Hume interpretation has misunderstood the entire purpose of his 'Chief Argument', and presented him as advocating some of the very positions he is arguing most strongly against.","Univ Oxford Hertford Coll, Oxford OX1 3BW, England","Millican, P (reprint author), Univ Oxford Hertford Coll, Catte St, Oxford OX1 3BW, England.","peter.millican@hertford.ox.ac.uk",,,,,"Ayer A. J., 1971, LANGUAGE TRUTH LOGIC; Baxter Andrew, 1733, ENQUIRY NATURE HUMAN; BEEBEE H, 2006, HUME CAUSATION; Beebee Helen, 2007, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V107, P413; BENTLEY R, 1692, MATTER MOTION CANNOT; Berkeley G., 1710, TREATISE CONCERNING; BLACKBURN S, 1990, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V50, P237, DOI 10.2307/2108041 ; Blackburn S, 1993, ESSAYS QUASIREALISM; Broughton J., 1987, HUME STUDIES, V13, P217; Buckle S., 2001, HUMES ENLIGHTENMENT; Clarke S., 1705, DEMONSTRATION BEING; CLARKE S, 1717, REMARKS BOOK ENTITUL; Collins Anthony, 1717, PHILOS INQUIRY HUMAN; COSTA MJ, 1989, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V67, P172, DOI 10.1080/00048408912343751 ; Craig E., 1987, MIND GOD WORKS MAN; Cudworth Ralph, 1678, TRUE INTELLECTUAL SY; EDWARD P, 1967, ENCY PHILOS; Frasca-Spada M., 2005, IMPRESSIONS HUME; Garrett D., 1997, COGNITION COMMITMENT; GLANVILL J, 1682, LUX ORIENTALIS; HALE B., 1997, COMPANION PHILOS LAN; Harris J., 2005, LIBERTY NECESSITY FR; Hume D., 1751, ENQUIRY PRINCIPLES M; Hume D., 2007, TREATISE HUMAN NATUR, V1; _Hume D, 1768, LETT D HUME, V2; Hume D, 1748, ENQUIRY HUMAN UNDERS; Hume David, 1779, DIALOGUES NATURAL RE; Hume David, 1987, ESSAYS MORAL POLITIC, P42; Kail P. J. E., 2003, HUME STUDIES, V29, P43; Kail P., 2007, PROJECTION REALISM H; Kail PJE, 2001, EUR J PHILOS, V9, P24, DOI 10.1111/1468-0378.00129 ; Kail P. J. E., 2003, BRIT J HIST PHILOS, V11, P509; Kames Henry Home, 1751, ESSAYS PRINCIPLES MO; KRIPKE S., 1980, NAMING NECESSITY; Locke John, 1690, ESSAY CONCERNING HUM; MILLICAN P, CANADIAN J IN PRESS; Millican P., 2007, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, VLXXXI, P163; Millican P., 2002, READING HUME HUMAN U; MINTZ S. I., 1970, HUNTING LEVIATHAN; MORE H, 1712, IMMORTALITY SOUL COL; MORICE GP, 1977, D HUME BICENTENARY P; Mossner Ernest Campbell, 1980, LIFE D HUME; Mossner Ernest Campbell, 1948, J HIST IDEAS, V9, P492; Quine W. V. O., 1953, LOGICAL POINT VIEW, P20; Read Rupert, 2007, NEW HUME DEBATE; Russell P., 1995, FREEDOM MORAL SENTIM; Russell P., 2008, RIDDLE HUMES TREATIS; SMITH NK, 1941, PHILOS D HUME; STILLINGFLEET E, 1962, ORIGINES SACRAE RATI; Strawson G., 1989, SECRET CONNEXION CAU; STRAWSON G, 2008, REAL MAT OTHER ESSAY; Tenison Thomas, 1670, CREED HOBBES EXAMINE; Ward Seth, 1656, THOMAE HOBBII PHILOS; WINKLER KP, 2007, PHILOS REV, V100, P541; Wood P, 2000, SCOTTISH ENLIGHTENME; Wright J. P., 1983, SCEPTICAL REALISM D; Yolton John, 1983, THINKING MATTER; YOLTON JW, 2000, REALISM APPEARANCES","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzp095",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","518UE","WOS:000271719000003",,"gold",,,"2018-01-02",266.0,"baxterandrew beebeeh beebeehelen bentleyr berkeleyg blackburns blackburns broughtonj buckles clarkes clarkes collinsanthony costamj craige cudworthralph edwardp frascaspadam garrettd glanvillj haleb harrisj humed humed humed humed humedavid humedavid kailpje kailp kailpje kailpje kameshenryhome kripkes lockejohn millicanp millicanp millicanp mintzsi moreh moricegp mossnerernestcampbell mossnerernestcampbell quinewvo readrupert russellp russellp smithnk stillingfleete strawsong strawsong tenisonthomas wardseth winklerkp woodp wrightjp yoltonjohn yoltonjw ayeraj","cluster_0"
-0.9065126147215329,-0.8063606100518096,40.0,19.0,19.0,0.0,0.0,2004.0,113.0,449.0,1.0,41.0,41.0,"J","Moltmann, F",,,,"Moltmann, F",,,"Properties and kinds of tropes: New linguistic facts and old philosophical insights","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"UNIVERSALS",,"Univ Stirling, Dept Philosophy, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland","Moltmann, F (reprint author), Univ Stirling, Dept Philosophy, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland.","friederike.moltmann@stir.ac.uk",,,,,"Aristotle, 1984, COMPLETE WORKS ARIST; ARMSTRONG D, 1997, LANGUAGE TRUTH ONTOL, P160; ARMSTRONG D, 1997, WORLD STATUS AFFAIRS; Armstrong D, 1978, UNIVERSALS SCI REALI; ARMSTRONG DM, 1980, PAC PHILOS QUART, V61, P440; Armstrong D. M., 1978, UNIVERSALS SCI REALI, VII; Armstrong D. M., 1989, UNIVERSALS OPINIONAT; Campbell K., 1990, ABSTRACT PARTICULARS; CARLSON Gregory, 1977, LINGUISTICS PHILOS, V1; Carlson Gregory N., 1977, THESIS U MASSACHUSET; CARLSON G. N., 1995, GENERIC BOOK; CHIERCHIA G, 1998, NAT LANG SEMANT, P339, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1008324218506; CHIERCHIA G, 1988, LINGUIST PHILOS, V11, P293; Chierchia Gennaro, 1984, THESIS U MASSACHUSET; DEVITT M, 1980, PACIFIC PHILOS AQ, V61, P443; Diesing Molly, 1992, INDEFINITES; FINE K, 1982, ARBITRARY OBJECTS; Hale B., 1987, ABSTRACT OBJECTS; JACKSON F, 1977, MIND, V86, P427; Koslicki K, 1999, MIND LANG, V14, P441, DOI 10.1111/1468-0017.00120 ; Laurence Stephen, 1998, CONT READINGS FDN ME; LEWIS D, 1983, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V61, P343, DOI 10.1080/00048408312341131 ; Lewis D., 1986, PLURALITY WORLDS; LONGOBARDI G, 2002, NATURAL LANGUAGE SEM, V9, P335; Loux M., 1998, METAPHYSICS CONT INT; Loux M. J., 1974, OCKHAMS THEORY TER 1; LOWE EJ, 1998, POSSIBILITY METAPHYS; Mellor D.H., 1997, PROPERTIES; MOLTMANN F, 2003, J PHILOS LOGIC, V35, P445; MOLTMANN F, 2003, SYNTHESE, V135, P170; Moltmann F., 1997, NAT LANG SEMANT, V5, P1; Montague R., 1974, FORMAL PHILOS; OCKHAM W, 1675, SUMMA TOTIUS LOGIC 1; Schubert L. K., 1987, NEW DIRECTIONS SEMAN, P387; SIMONS P, 1994, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V54, P553, DOI 10.2307/2108581 ; STRAWSON P, 1995, INDIVIDUALS; Williams D. C., 1953, REV METAPHYS, V7, P171; Wright C., 1983, FREGES CONCEPTION NU; Zamparelli R., 2002, ROMANCE LANGUAGES LI, P305; Zimmermann T. E., 1993, NAT LANG SEMANT, V2, P149","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/113.449.1",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","769QF","WOS:000188660700001",,,,,"2018-01-02",267.0,"armstrongd armstrongd armstrongd armstrongdm armstrongdm armstrongdm campbellk carlsongregory carlsongregoryn carlsongn chierchiag chierchiag chierchiagennaro devittm diesingmolly finek haleb jacksonf koslickik laurencestephen lewisd lewisd longobardig louxm louxmj loweej mellordh moltmannf moltmannf moltmannf montaguer ockhamw schubertlk simonsp strawsonp williamsdc wrightc zamparellir zimmermannte aristotle","cluster_3"
-0.47225856357100926,-0.34959570332658224,18.0,19.0,19.0,0.0,1.0,1999.0,108.0,429.0,95.0,125.0,31.0,"J","Noordhof, P",,,,"Noordhof, P",,,"Probabilistic causation, preemption and counterfactuals","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"DEPENDENCE",,"Univ Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England","Noordhof, P (reprint author), Univ Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England.",,"Noordhof, Paul/H-1604-2013",,,,"BENNETT J, 1987, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V1, P367; Bennett J.F, 1988, EVENTS THEIR NAMES; Byrne A, 1998, ANALYSIS, V58, P38; Ganeri J, 1998, ANALYSIS, V58, P45, DOI 10.1111/1467-8284.00100 ; GANERI J, 1996, ANALYSIS, V56, P216; HAUSMAN DM, 1996, NOUS, V30, P55, DOI 10.2307/2216303 ; Honderich Ted, 1988, THEORY DETERMINISM; Lewis D., 1986, PHILOS PAPERS; MACKIE P, 1992, MIND, V101, P483, DOI 10.1093/mind/101.403.483 ; MCDERMOTT M, 1995, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V46, P323; MELLOR D, 1959, FACTS CAUSATION; MENZIES P, 1996, MIND, V105, P85, DOI 10.1093/mind/105.417.85 ; MENZIES P, 1989, PHILOS SCI, V56, P642, DOI 10.1086/289518 ; Noordhof P, 1998, MIND, V107, P457, DOI 10.1093/mind/107.426.457 ; NOORDHOF P, 1998, MIND, V107, P857; Ramachandran M, 1997, MIND, V106, P263, DOI 10.1093/mind/106.422.263 ; Ramachandran M, 1998, MIND, V107, P465, DOI 10.1093/mind/107.426.465 ; VIHVELIN K, 1995, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V73, P560, DOI 10.1080/00048409512346901","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/108.429.95",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","162JL","WOS:000078342400005",,,,,"2018-01-02",268.0,"bennettjf byrnea ganerij ganerij hausmandm honderichted lewisd mackiep mcdermottm mellord menziesp menziesp noordhofp noordhofp ramachandranm ramachandranm vihvelink bennettj","cluster_3"
-0.6802357819918075,-0.662428246932852,67.0,19.0,19.0,0.0,0.0,1998.0,107.0,428.0,763.0,798.0,36.0,"J","Weir, A",,,,"Weir, A",,,"Naive set theory is innocent! (Paradox)","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"Queens Univ Belfast, Dept Philosophy, Belfast BT7 1NN, Antrim, North Ireland","Weir, A (reprint author), Queens Univ Belfast, Dept Philosophy, Belfast BT7 1NN, Antrim, North Ireland.",,,,,,"BELL JL, 1981, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V32, P349, DOI 10.1093/bjps/32.4.349 ; Benaceraff Paul, 1983, PHILOS MATH SELECTED; BOOLOS G, 1985, PHILOS REV, V94, P327, DOI 10.2307/2185003 ; BOOLOS G, 1984, J PHILOS, V81, P430, DOI 10.2307/2026308 ; Boolos G., 1993, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, VLXVII, P213; Benacerraf P., 1983, PHILOS MATH SELECTED, P486; BOOLOS GS, 1975, J PHILOS, V72, P509, DOI 10.2307/2025179 ; Brady R. T., 1989, PARACONSISTENT LOGIC, P437; Brady R. T., 1989, PARACONSISTENT LOGIC, P415, DOI 10.1007/BF00935736; Brady R. T., 1983, NOTRE DAME J FORM L, V24, P431, DOI 10.1305/ndjfl/1093870447; Bridges D, 1987, VARIETIES CONSTRUCTI; Burge T., 1984, RECENT ESSAYS TRUTH, P83; Burgess J. P., 1983, NOTRE DAME J FORM L, V24, P41; CARTWRIGHT RL, 1994, NOUS, V28, P1, DOI 10.2307/2215917 ; Drake F. R., 1974, SET THEORY INTRO LAR; DUMMETT M, 1994, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V94, P243; Dummett Michael, 1978, TRUTH OTHER ENIGMAS; DUMMETT M, 1994, MATH MIND; Dummett Michel, 1991, FREGE PHILOS MATH; DUMMETT M, 1993, SEAS LANGUAGE, P429; Dummett Michael, 1973, FREGE PHILOS LANGUAG; Dummett M. A. E., 1977, ELEMENTS INTUITIONIS; Etchemendy J, 1990, CONCEPT LOGICAL CONS; Fitch F., 1952, SYMBOLIC LOGIC; FITCH F, 1969, ESSAYS HONOR CG HEMP, P255; Forster T. E., 1992, SET THEORY UNIVERSAL; GEORGE A, 1984, MATH MIND; Hallett M., 1984, CANTORIAN SET THEORY; HELLMAN G, 1989, MATH WITHOUT MODALIT; Heyting A., 1956, INTUITIONISM INTRO; Hinnion R., 1994, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, V35, P15; Hintikka J., 1969, PHILOS MATH; KREISEL G, 1968, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V33, P321, DOI 10.2307/2270324 ; Kreisel G., 1967, PROBLEMS PHILOS MATH, P138; KRIPKE S, 1984, RECENT ESSAYS TRUTH, P53; KRIPKE S, 1975, J PHILOS, V72; Lavine S., 1994, UNDERSTANDING INFINI; LEAR J, 1977, J PHILOS, V74, P86, DOI 10.2307/2025573 ; Lewis D.K., 1991, PARTS CLASSES; Locke John, ESSAY HUMAN UNDERSTA; Martin R.L., 1984, RECENT ESSAYS TRUTH; McGee V., 1991, TRUTH VAGUENESS PARA; Moore A., 1990, INFINITE; Moore G.H., 1980, HIST PHILOS LOGIC, V1, P95; MOORE GH, 1988, MINNESOTA STUDIES PH, P95; OBERSCHELP A, 1973, DISSERTATIONES MATH; Parsons C., 1977, LOGIC FDN MATH COMPU, P335; Parsons Charles, 1974, NOUS, V8; Parsons Charles, 1983, MATH PHILOS SELECTED; Parsons Terence, 1987, NOTRE DAME J FORM L, V28, P161, DOI DOI 10.1305/NDJFL/1093636853.61; POTTER M, 1993, PHILOS Q, V43, P127; PRIEST G, 1994, MIND, V103, P387, DOI 10.1093/mind/103.411.387 ; PRIEST G, 1987, CONTRADICITON; PRIEST G, 1995, BEYOND LIMITS THOUGH; Priest Graham, 1989, PARACONSISTENT LOGIC, P367; Putnam H., 1990, REALISM HUMAN FACE, P3; READ S, 1994, J PHILOS LOGIC, V23, P247, DOI 10.1007/BF01048482 ; READ S., 1988, RELEVANT LOGIC; Restall G., 1992, NOTRE DAME J FORM L, V33, P422; RUSSELL B, 1901, MYSTICISM LOGIC; SHAPIRO S, 1991, F WITHOUT FOUNDATION; Shoenfield J, 1967, MATH LOGIC; Slaney J.K., 1989, PARACONSISTENT LOGIC, P472; SMILEY TJ, 1959, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V59, P233; Tennant Neil, 1987, ANTIREALISM LOGIC; WEIR A, 1996, PHILOS BOOKS, V37, P136; WHITE R, 1979, J PHILOS LOGIC, V6, P503","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/107.428.763",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","130KZ","WOS:000076520400004",,,,,"2018-01-02",269.0,"benaceraffpaul boolosg boolosg boolosg benacerrafp boolosgs bradyrt bradyrt bradyrt bridgesd burget burgessjp cartwrightrl drakefr dummettm dummettmichael dummettm dummettmichel dummettm dummettmichael dummettmae etchemendyj fitchf fitchf forsterte georgea hallettm hellmang heytinga hinnionr hintikkaj kreiselg kreiselg kripkes kripkes lavines learj lewisdk lockejohn martinrl mcgeev moorea mooregh mooregh oberschelpa parsonsc parsonscharles parsonscharles parsonsterence potterm priestg priestg priestg priestgraham putnamh reads reads restallg russellb shapiros shoenfieldj slaneyjk smileytj tennantneil weira whiter belljl","cluster_0"
-0.17048612682731523,-0.16173571150575816,9.0,19.0,19.0,0.0,0.0,1994.0,103.0,409.0,35.0,41.0,7.0,"J","HYDE, D",,,,"HYDE, D",,,"WHY HIGHER-ORDER VAGUENESS IS A PSEUDO-PROBLEM","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"HYDE, D (reprint author), AUSTRALIAN NATL UNIV,RES SCH SOCIAL SCI,PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM,CANBERRA,ACT 2601,AUSTRALIA.",,,,,,"ALSTON WP, 1967, ENCYCL PHILOS, P218; Fine Kit, 1975, SYNTHESE, V30, P265, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00485047; ROLF B, 1980, J PHILOS LOGIC, V9, P315, DOI 10.1007/BF00248397 ; Rolf Bertil, 1981, TOPICS VAGUENESS; Russell B., 1923, AUST J PHILOS, V1, P84; SAINSBURY M, 1991, PHILOS QUART, V41, P167, DOI 10.2307/2219591 ; SORENSEN RA, 1985, ANALYSIS, V45, P134, DOI 10.2307/3327138 ; TYE M, 1990, MIND, V99, P535; Wright C., 1987, PHILOS TOPICS, V15, P227","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/103.409.35",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","MW974","WOS:A1994MW97400004",,,,,"2018-01-02",271.0,"finekit rolfb rolfbertil russellb sainsburym sorensenra tyem wrightc alstonwp","cluster_0"
-0.40358841984445787,-0.34496234455460306,24.0,19.0,19.0,0.0,1.0,1992.0,101.0,404.0,721.0,731.0,11.0,"J","KUNNE, W",,,,"KUNNE, W",,,"HYBRID PROPER NAMES","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"FREGE",,,"KUNNE, W (reprint author), UNIV HAMBURG,PHILOSOPH SEMINAR,VON MELLE PK 6,W-2000 HAMBURG 13,GERMANY.",,,,,,"BURGE T, 1979, PHILOS REV, V88, P398, DOI 10.2307/2184957 ; Davidson Donald, 1984, TRUTH INTERPRETATION; Dummett M., 1981, INTERPRETATION FREGE; Evans G., 1981, MEANING UNDERSTANDIN; Evans G., 1982, VARIETIES REFERENCE; Frege G., 1918, BEITRAGE PHILOS DTSC, VI; FREGE G, 1969, G FREGE POSTHUMOUS W; Frege G., 1952, TRANSLATIONS PHILOS; Frege G., 1969, NACHGELASSENE SCHRIF; GABRIEL G, 1979, FREGE WISSENSCHAFTLI; KAPLAN D, 1975, J PHILOS, V72, P716, DOI 10.2307/2024635 ; KUNNE W, 1990, WHITEHEADS METAPHYSI; KUNNE W, 1987, SPEECH ACT SACHVERHA; Kunne Wolfgang, 1983, ABSTRAKTE GEGENSTAND; Lee Desmond, 1980, WITTGENSTEINS LECTUR; Moore G. E., 1959, PHILOS PAPERS; Peirce C. S., 1932, COLLECTED PAPERS; PERRY J, 1977, PHILOS REV, V86, P474, DOI 10.2307/2184564 ; Reichenbach H., 1947, ELEMENTS SYMBOLIC LO; SCHLICK M, 1979, COLLECTED PAPERS; WITTGENSTEIN L, 1970, PHILOS BEMERKUNGEN; Wittgenstein L., 1970, PHILOS UNTERSUCHUNGE; Wittgenstein Ludwig, 1975, PHILOS REMARKS; Wittgenstein L., 1964, BLUE BROWN BOOKS","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/101.404.721",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","JV063","WOS:A1992JV06300004",,,,,"2018-01-02",272.0,"davidsondonald dummettm evansg evansg fregeg fregeg fregeg fregeg gabrielg kapland kunnew kunnew kunnewolfgang leedesmond moorege peircecs perryj reichenbachh schlickm wittgensteinl wittgensteinl wittgensteinludwig wittgensteinl burget","cluster_0"
-0.1336767808274201,-0.23270571925651254,24.0,19.0,19.0,0.0,0.0,1992.0,101.0,401.0,17.0,34.0,18.0,"J","BREWER, B",,,,"BREWER, B",,,"SELF LOCATION AND AGENCY","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"BREWER, B (reprint author), UNIV CAMBRIDGE KINGS COLL,CAMBRIDGE CB2 1ST,ENGLAND.",,,"Brewer, Bill/0000-0002-6258-8802",,,"ACREDOLO LP, 1978, DEV PSYCHOL, V14, P224, DOI 10.1037/0012-1649.14.3.224; CAMPBELL J, 1992, UNPUB PROBLEMS PHIL; CAMPBELL J, 1984, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V85, P149; CASSAM Q, 1989, REV METAPHYS, V43, P72; Crane T., 1992, CONTENTS EXPERIENCE; EILAN N, 1992, PROBLEMS PHILOS PSYC; Evans G., 1985, COLLECT PAPERS, P364; Evans G., 1982, VARIETIES REFERENCE; Hume David, 1978, TREATISE HUMAN NATUR; Janaway Christopher, 1989, SELF WORLD SCHOPENHA; JANAWAY C, 1983, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V84, P147; Kant Immanuel, 1929, CRITIQUE PURE REASON; PEACOCK C, 1992, UNPUB CONTENTS EXPER; PEACOCKE C, 1988, PHILOS REV, V97, P463, DOI 10.2307/2185412 ; Peacocke Christopher, 1989, TRANSCENDENTAL ARGUM; Peacocke Ch., 1983, SENSE AND CONTENT; PEARS D, 1987, FALSE PRISON, V1; Russell Bertrand, 1912, PROBLEMS PHILOS; Schopenhauer A., 1966, WORLD WILL REPRESENT, V2; SHOEMAKER, 1984, IDENTITY CAUSE MIND, P6; Shoemaker Sydney, 1984, IDENTITY CAUSE MIND, P19; STRAWSON P., 1959, INDIVIDUALS; Strawson Peter F., 1966, BOUNDS SENSE; WITTGENSTEIN L, 1961, TRACTATUS LOGICO-PHI","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/101.401.17",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","HA983","WOS:A1992HA98300002",,,,,"2018-01-02",273.0,"campbellj campbellj cassamq cranet eilann evansg evansg humedavid janawaychristopher janawayc kantimmanuel peacockc peacockec peacockechristopher peacockech pearsd russellbertrand schopenhauera shoemaker shoemakersydney strawsonp strawsonpeterf wittgensteinl acredololp","cluster_0"
-0.22403253593254718,-0.05630414248070749,14.0,19.0,19.0,0.0,0.0,1990.0,99.0,395.0,447.0,451.0,5.0,"J","BRUECKNER, A",,,,"BRUECKNER, A",,,"SKEPTICISM ABOUT KNOWLEDGE OF CONTENT","MIND",,,"English","Discussion",,,,,,,,,,"BRUECKNER, A (reprint author), UNIV CALIF SANTA BARBARA,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,SANTA BARBARA,CA 93106, USA.",,,,,,"BOGHOSSIAN P, 1989, PHILOS TOPICS, P13; BRUECKNER A, 1984, ANALYSIS; BRUECKNER A, 1985, PHILOS TOPICS; BRUECKNER A, 1986, J PHILOS; Burge Tyler, 1979, MIDWEST STUDIES PHIL, VIV; BURGE T, 1989, J PHILOS; Davidson Donald, 1987, P ADDRESSES AM PHILO; DRETSKE F, 1970, J PHILOS; HEIL J, 1980, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC; HEIL J, 1981, REASON TRUTH HIST, pCH2; HEIL J, 1988, MIND; HEIL J, 1988, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, P168; NOZICK R, 1981, PHILOS EXPLANATIONS; Woodfield Andrew, 1982, THOUGHT AND OBJECT","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","DR991","WOS:A1990DR99100008",,,,,"2018-01-02",274.0,"bruecknera bruecknera bruecknera burgetyler burget davidsondonald dretskef heilj heilj heilj heilj nozickr woodfieldandrew boghossianp","cluster_0"
-0.018348412769046717,0.1326951501638658,16.0,19.0,19.0,0.0,0.0,1982.0,91.0,363.0,398.0,417.0,20.0,"J","STOCKER, M",,,,"STOCKER, M",,,"RESPONSIBILITY ESPECIALLY FOR BELIEFS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"STOCKER, M (reprint author), LA TROBE UNIV,BUNDOORA,VIC 3083,AUSTRALIA.",,,,,,"ELLIS BJF, RATIONAL BELIEF SYST; EVANS, 1963, PHILOSOPHY; FRANKFURT, 1976, IDENTITIES PERSONS; FRANKFURT, 1979, AM PHILOS Q, P157; GINSBERG, MIND BELIEF; GOVIER, 1976, DIALOGUE; GRANT, 1976, PHILOSOPHY; KAUBER, 1974, CANADIAN J PHILOS; NEWMAN JH, ESSAY AID GRAMMAR AS; PRICE DJD, 1954, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S; STOCKER M, 1980, EXPLAINING EMOTION; STOCKER M, 1968, NOUS; STOCKER M, 1971, AUSTRALASIAN J PHILO; THALBERG, 1978, MIND, P395; Williams Bernard, 1973, PROBLEMS SELF, P148; WINTERS, 1979, J PHILOS","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","NZ720","WOS:A1982NZ72000005",,,,,"2018-01-02",275.0,"evans frankfurt frankfurt ginsberg govier grant kauber newmanjh pricedjd stockerm stockerm stockerm thalberg williamsbernard winters ellisbjf","cluster_6"
-3.247188970463361E-4,0.06061169227753127,16.0,19.0,22.0,0.0,0.0,1979.0,88.0,349.0,1.0,23.0,23.0,"J","LOUX, MJ",,,,"LOUX, MJ",,,"FORM, SPECIES AND PREDICATION IN METAPHYSICS Z, H, AND THETA","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"LOUX, MJ (reprint author), UNIV NOTRE DAME,NOTRE DAME,IN 46556, USA.",,,,,,"ARISTOTLE, POSTERIOR ANAL, V2, P10; ARISTOTLE, DE ANIMA, V2, P1; ARISTOTLE, 1957, J PHILOSOPHY, P699; ARISTOTLE, DE GENERATIONE, V2, P1; ARISTOTLE, METAPHYSICS, V3, P1070; CHARLTON W, ARISTOTLE PHYSICS, V2; CHARLTON W, 1970, ARISTOTLE PHYSICS, V1, P70; JONES B, 1974, PHILOS REV, P474; LACEY AR, 1965, PHRONESIS, P54; LESHER JH, 1971, PHRONESIS, P169; OWEN GEL, ARISTOTLE PLATO MID, P163; Quine W. V. O., 1960, WORD OBJECT; ROSS WD, 1924, ARISTOTLES METAPHYSI, V1, P310; STRAWSON, 1959, INDIVIDUALS, pCH6; SYKES RD, 1975, PHILOSOPHY, P311; WOODS M, 1967, ARISTOTLE COLLECTION, P215","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","GH782","WOS:A1979GH78200001",,,,,"2018-01-02",276.0,"aristotle aristotle aristotle aristotle charltonw charltonw jonesb laceyar lesherjh owengel quinewvo rosswd strawson sykesrd woodsm aristotle","cluster_4"
-0.021962197057525383,-0.024141344493170326,11.0,19.0,19.0,0.0,1.0,1961.0,70.0,280.0,534.0,539.0,6.0,"J","BIRD, O",,,,"BIRD, O",,,"THE RE-DISCOVERY OF THE TOPICS","MIND",,,"English","Discussion",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"ABELARD, 1956, DIALECTICA; ALBERT SAXONY, 1523, PERUTILIS LOGICA; COOLEY JC, 1959, J PHILOS, V56, P297, DOI 10.2307/2021996 ; JOHN SALISBURY, 1929, METALOGICON; PETER SPAIN, 1947, SUMMULAE LOGICALES; Popper K., 1959, LOGIC DISCOVERY; PSEUDOSCOT, 1639, OPERA OMNIA, V1; RAMSEY FP, 1931, F MATH; Ryle G., 1949, CONCEPT MIND; Toulmin S., 1953, PHILOS SCI; Toulmin S., 1958, USES ARGUMENT","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","CCP50","WOS:A1961CCP5000008",,,,,"2018-01-02",277.0,"albertsaxony cooleyjc johnsalisbury peterspain popperk pseudoscot ramseyfp ryleg toulmins toulmins abelard","cluster_0"
-0.12263106246551074,-0.14830615319575688,5.0,19.0,19.0,0.0,0.0,1960.0,69.0,273.0,41.0,54.0,14.0,"J","PAP, A",,,,"PAP, A",,,"TYPES AND MEANINGLESSNESS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"CARNAP R, LOGICAL SYNTAX LANGU; QUINE WV, 1951, PHILOS STUDIES, V2; Quine W. V. O., 1951, MATH LOGIC; RUSSELL, 1924, LOGICAL ATOMISM; WHITE MG, 1956, REUNION PHILOS, pCH5","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","CHA01","WOS:A1960CHA0100004",,,,,"2018-01-02",278.0,"quinewv quinewvo russell whitemg carnapr","cluster_0"
-0.266328688531166,-0.24677580573050822,34.0,18.0,18.0,0.0,1.0,2012.0,121.0,483.0,731.0,751.0,21.0,"J","Ward, D",,,,"Ward, Dave",,,"Enjoying the Spread: Conscious Externalism Reconsidered","MIND",,,"English","Editorial Material",,,,,,,"PERCEPTUAL EXPERIENCE","According to a variety of recent 'enactivist' proposals, the material basis of conscious experience might extend beyond the boundaries of the brain and nervous system and into the environment. Clark (2009) surveys several such arguments and finds them wanting. Here I respond on behalf of the enactivist. Clarifying the commitments of enactivism at the personal and subpersonal levels and considering how those levels relate lets us see where Clark's analysis of enactivism goes wrong. Clark understands the enactivists as attempting to provide hypotheses about the subpersonal mechanisms underlying experience according to which those mechanisms contingently include portions of the environment. But understanding enactivism instead as involving a relational conception of experience at the personal level, with apparent implications for the location of the subpersonal mechanisms of experience, allows us to make better sense of the enactivist arguments, and make the case for conscious externalism.","Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, Midlothian, Scotland","Ward, D (reprint author), Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, Midlothian, Scotland.","Dave.Ward@ed.ac.uk",,,,,"Arbib M., 2003, HDB BRAIN THEORY NEU; Bermudez J. L., 2000, PHILOS EXPLORATIONS, P63; Block N, 2005, J PHILOS, V102, P259, DOI 10.5840/jphil2005102524 ; Clark A, 1998, ANALYSIS, V58, P7, DOI 10.1111/1467-8284.00096; Clark A, 2002, J CONSCIOUSNESS STUD, V9, P181; Clark A., 2008, SUPERSIZING MIND EMB; Clark A, 2009, MIND, V118, P963, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzp110; Davies Martin, 2000, MIND SOC, V2, P87; Dennett Daniel, 1991, CONSCIOUSNESS EXPLAI; Gendler Tamar Szabo, 2006, PERCEPTUAL EXPERIENC; Hawthorne J., 2008, PHILOS MIND; Hurley S, 2003, BIOL PHILOS, V18, P131, DOI 10.1023/A:1023308401356; Hurley S.L., 1998, CONSCIOUSNESS ACTION; McDowell J, 1998, J PHILOS, V95, P431, DOI 10.2307/2564576 ; McDowell J, 2003, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V67, P675, DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00315.x ; MCDOWELL J, 1994, PHILOS QUART, V44, P190, DOI 10.2307/2219740 ; McDowell J, 1998, MEANING KNOWLEDGE RE; McDowell J., 1994, MIND WORLD; Mcdowell J, 2007, INQUIRY, V50, P338, DOI 10.1080/00201740701489211; Menary R., 2010, EXTENDED MIND; Millar A, 2007, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V74, P176, DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00008.x ; Millikan R. G., 1984, LANGUAGE THOUGHT OTH; Noe A, 2004, J CONSCIOUSNESS STUD, V11, P3; Noe A., 2008, PHILOS PHENOMENOLOGI, V76, P666; Noe Alva, 2005, PHILOS TOPICS, V33, P235; Noe Alva, 2004, ACTION PERCEPTION; Noe A, 2009, PHILOS QUART, V59, P470, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2009.630.x; O'Regan JK, 2001, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V24, P939, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X01000115 ; Pettit P., SUBJECT THOUGHT CONT; Putnam H, 1999, THREEFOLD CORD MIND; Schellenberg S, 2008, J PHILOS, V105, P55, DOI 10.5840/jphil200810525 ; Stewart J., 2010, ENACTION TOWARDS NEW; Thompson E, 2001, TRENDS COGN SCI, V5, P418, DOI 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01750-2 ; Thompson E., 2007, MIND LIFE","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzs095",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","139FV","WOS:000318568300006",,,,,"2018-01-02",279.0,"bermudezjl blockn clarka clarka clarka clarka daviesmartin dennettdaniel gendlertamarszabo hawthornej hurleys hurleysl mcdowellj mcdowellj mcdowellj mcdowellj mcdowellj mcdowellj menaryr millara millikanrg noea noea noealva noealva noea oreganjk pettitp putnamh schellenbergs stewartj thompsone thompsone arbibm","cluster_0"
-0.23293380722976934,-0.23403171371903145,36.0,18.0,18.0,0.0,3.0,2012.0,121.0,482.0,269.0,308.0,40.0,"J","Linnebo, O; Rayo, A",,,,"Linnebo, Oystein; Rayo, Agustin",,,"Hierarchies Ontological and Ideological","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"LOGIC","Godel claimed that Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory is 'what becomes of the theory of types if certain superfluous restrictions are removed'. The aim of this paper is to develop a clearer understanding of Godel's remark, and of the surrounding philosophical terrain. In connection with this, we discuss some technical issues concerning infinitary type theories and the programme of developing the semantics for higher-order languages in other higher-order languages.","[Linnebo, Oystein] Univ London, London WC1E 7HU, England; [Rayo, Agustin] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA","Linnebo, O (reprint author), Univ London, London WC1E 7HU, England.","o.linnebo@bbk.ac.uk; arayo@mit.edu",,,,,"Benacerraf P., 1964, PHILOS MATH SELECTED; Bolander T., 2006, SELF REFERENCE; BOOLOS G, 1985, PHILOS REV, V94, P327, DOI 10.2307/2185003 ; BOOLOS G, 1984, J PHILOS, V81, P430, DOI 10.2307/2026308 ; Boolos George, 1998, LOGIC LOGIC LOGIC; Butts R., 1977, LOGIC FDN MATH COMPU; Carnap Rudolf, 1934, LOGICAL SYNTAX LANGU; Dedekind Richard, 1888, WAS SIND WAS SOLLEN; Degen W, 2000, MATH LOGIC QUART, V46, P147, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3870(200005)46:2<147::AID-MALQ147>3.0.CO;2-2; Ewald W, 1996, KANT HILBERT SOURCE, VII; Frege Gottlob, 1879, BEGRIFFSSCHRIFT ARIT; Godel K., 1995, COLLECTED WORKS, V3; GODEL K, 1933, PRESENT SITUATION FD; Godel K., 1931, MONATSHEFTE MATH PHY, V38, P173, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01700692; Hawthorne John, 2003, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES; Hilbert D, 1926, MATH ANN, V95, P161, DOI 10.1007/BF01206605 ; Leng M., 2007, MATH KNOWLEDGE; Lewis D.K., 1991, PARTS CLASSES; Linnebo O, 2003, NOUS, V37, P71, DOI 10.1111/1468-0068.00429 ; Linnebo O, 2008, ANALYSIS-UK, V68, P186, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8284.2008.00737.x; Linnebo O, 2010, J PHILOS, V107, P144, DOI 10.5840/jphil2010107311 ; McGee V, 1997, PHILOS REV, V106, P35, DOI 10.2307/2998341 ; Parsons C., 1983, MATH PHILOS; Parsons Charles, 1977, WHAT IS ITERATIVE CO, p[335, 503]; Quine W., 1986, PHILOS LOGIC; Rayo A, 2001, NOUS, V35, P74, DOI 10.1111/0029-4624.00288 ; Rayo Agustin, 1999, NOTRE DAME J FORM L, V40, P315, DOI DOI 10.1305/NDJFL/1022615612.75; Rayo A., 2006, ABSOLUTE GEN; SHAPIRO S, 1987, J PHILOS LOGIC, V16, P309, DOI 10.1007/BF00152934 ; SHAPIRO S, 2000, FDN FDN CASE 2 ORDER; TARSKI Alfred, 1935, STUDIA PHILOS, V1, P261; Tarski Alfred, 1983, LOGIC SEMANTICS META; Heijenoort Jean van, 1967, FREGE GODEL; Wang Hao, 1952, MIND, V61, P366; Wright Crispin, 2007, FUND MATH, P150; Zermelo E., 1930, FUND MATH, V16, P29","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzs050",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","051HJ","WOS:000312116800002",,,,,"2018-01-02",280.0,"bolandert boolosg boolosg boolosgeorge buttsr carnaprudolf dedekindrichard degenw ewaldw fregegottlob godelk godelk godelk hawthornejohn hilbertd lengm lewisdk linneboo linneboo linneboo mcgeev parsonsc parsonscharles quinew rayoa rayoagustin rayoa shapiros shapiros tarskialfred tarskialfred heijenoortjeanvan wanghao wrightcrispin zermeloe benacerrafp","cluster_0"
-0.7404154565056055,1.4990579311775007,64.0,18.0,19.0,0.0,7.0,2011.0,120.0,479.0,761.0,802.0,42.0,"J","Southwood, N",,,,"Southwood, Nicholas",,,"The Moral/Conventional Distinction","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"RATIONALITY; CONVENTION; PROMISES; MORALITY","Commonsense suggests that moral judgements and conventional normative judgements are importantly different in kind. Yet a compelling vindicating account of the moral/conventional distinction has proven persistently elusive. The distinction is typically explicated in terms of either formal properties (the Form View) or substantive properties (the Content View) of the principles that figure in the judgements. But the most promising versions of these views face serious difficulties. After reviewing the difficulties with the standard accounts, I propose a new way of explicating the moral/conventional distinction in terms of the role that social practices play in grounding the judgements (the Grounds View).","Australian Natl Univ, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia","Southwood, N (reprint author), Australian Natl Univ, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.","nicholas.southwood@anu.edu.au",,,,,"Lover A., 1995, CHILDRENS CONCEPTION, P87; ARSENIO WF, 1985, MERRILL PALMER QUART, V31, P1; Baier Kurt, 1958, MORAL POINT VIEW RAT; BARRY B., 1995, JUSTICE IMPARTIALITY; Brennan Geoffrey, 2010, NORMS VALUES SOCIAL; Benedict Ruth, 1946, CHRYSANTHEMUM SWORD; Bennett J., 1974, PHILOSOPHY, V49, P123, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0031819100048014; Bicchieri C., 2006, GRAMMAR SOC NATURE D; Brandt R., 1979, THEORY GOOD RIGHT; Brennan G, 2004, EC ESTEEM; Brennan G., 2007, COMMON MINDS THEMES; BRINK D. O., 1989, MORAL REALISM FDN ET; Broome J, 1999, RATIO, V12, P398, DOI 10.1111/1467-9329.00101 ; Darwall Stephen, 2006, 2 PERSON STANDPOINT; Dodds E. R., 1951, GREEKS IRRATIONAL; Ewing AC, 1944, MIND, V53, P120; Falk W. D, 1952, OUGHT MOTIVATION, P492; Firth R., 1952, PHILOS PHENOMENOLOGI, V12, P317; FOOT P, 1972, PHILOS REV, V81, P305, DOI 10.2307/2184328 ; Forster E. M., 1924, PASSAGE INDIA; Friedrich Daniel, 2011, PROMISES TRUST, P275; Gilbert M., 1989, SOCIAL FACTS; Gilbert M, 2008, TOPOI-INT REV PHILOS, V27, P5, DOI 10.1007/s11245-008-9032-5; Hare R. M., 1981, MORAL THINKING ITS L; HARMAN G, 1975, PHILOS REV, V84, P3, DOI 10.2307/2184078 ; Kant I., 1785, GROUNDWORK METAPHYSI; KEKES J, 1981, AM PHILOS QUART, V18, P295; Kelly D, 2007, MIND LANG, V22, P117, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2007.00302.x ; KILLEN M., 1995, MORALITY EVERYDAY LI; Kolodny N, 2005, MIND, V114, P509, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzi223; Kolodny N, 2003, PHILOS PUBLIC AFF, V31, P119, DOI 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2003.00119.x ; Lewis D. K., 1969, CONVENTION PHILOS ST; MacCormick Neil, 1972, P AR SOC S, V46, P59; Mackie J., 1977, ETHICS INVENTING RIG; Marmor A, 1996, SYNTHESE, V107, P349, DOI 10.1007/BF00413841 ; Mill John Stuard, 1861, UTILITARIANISM LIBER; Nagel T, 1991, EQUALITY PARTIALITY, V33; Nagel T., 1970, POSSIBILITY ALTRUISM; Nagel T., 1986, VIEW NOWHERE; Nichols S., 2002, COGNITION, V84, P223, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00048-3; Owens D, 2006, PHILOS REV, V115, P51, DOI 10.1215/00318108-2005-002; Rawls John, 1971, THEORY JUSTICE; Ross W. D., 1930, RIGHT GOOD; Royzman EB, 2009, COGNITION, V112, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.04.004; SCANLON T., 1998, WHAT WE OWE EACH OTH; Scanlon T. M, 2007, STRUCTURAL IRRATIONA, P84; Scheffler Samuel, 1982, REJECTION CONSEQUENT; Schroeder M, 2009, PHILOS STUD, V143, P223, DOI 10.1007/s11098-008-9200-x; SELLARS WS, 1952, READINGS ETHICAL THE; Sheinman H., 2011, PROMISES AGREEMENTS; Sidwick Henry, 1962, METHODS ETHICS; SINGER MG, 1959, ETHICS, V69, P202, DOI 10.1086/291210 ; Smith M., 1994, MORAL PROBLEM; Southwood N., 2010, CONTRACTUALISM FDN M; Southwood Nicholas, 2010, AUTHORITY SOCIAL NOR, P234; Southwood N, 2011, PHILOS EXPLOR, V14, P195, DOI 10.1080/13869795.2011.569748; Southwood N, 2009, PHILOS STUD, V144, P261, DOI 10.1007/s11098-008-9209-1; Southwood N, 2008, ETHICS, V119, P9, DOI 10.1086/592586 ; Sugden Robert, 1986, EC RIGHTS COOPERATIO; Sugden Robert, 1983, DEV SOCIAL KNOWLEDGE; Sugden Robert, 2010, IS THERE DISTINCTION, P47; Turiel E, 1977, Nebr Symp Motiv, V25, P77; Williams B., 1981, MORAL LUCK PHILOS PA; Wong David, 2006, NATURALISTIC MORALIT","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzr048",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","883AG","WOS:000299604400006",,,,,"2018-01-02",281.0,"arseniowf baierkurt barryb brennangeoffrey benedictruth bennettj bicchieric brandtr brennang brennang brinkdo broomej darwallstephen doddser ewingac falkwd firthr footp forsterem friedrichdaniel gilbertm gilbertm harerm harmang kanti kekesj kellyd killenm kolodnyn kolodnyn lewisdk maccormickneil mackiej marmora milljohnstuard nagelt nagelt nagelt nicholss owensd rawlsjohn rosswd royzmaneb scanlont scanlontm schefflersamuel schroederm sellarsws sheinmanh sidwickhenry singermg smithm southwoodn southwoodnicholas southwoodn southwoodn southwoodn sugdenrobert sugdenrobert sugdenrobert turiele williamsb wongdavid lovera","cluster_6"
-2.0283874368008297,-1.3283584472794532,140.0,18.0,18.0,0.0,4.0,2011.0,120.0,478.0,263.0,327.0,65.0,"J","Malmgren, AS",,,,"Malmgren, Anna-Sara",,,"Rationalism and the Content of Intuitive Judgements","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"PHILOSOPHICAL INTUITIONS; KNOWLEDGE; FICTION; TRUTH; SEMANTICS; EPISTEMOLOGY; THINKING; LAWS","It is commonly held that our intuitive judgements about imaginary problem cases are justified a priori, if and when they are justified at all. In this paper I defend this view 'rationalism' against a recent objection by Timothy Williamson. I argue that his objection fails on multiple grounds, but the reasons why it fails are instructive. Williamson argues from a claim about the semantics of intuitive judgements, to a claim about their psychological underpinnings, to the denial of rationalism. I argue that the psychological claim that a capacity for mental simulation explains our intuitive judgements does not, even if true, provide reasons to reject rationalism. (More generally, a simulation hypothesis, about any category of judgements, is very limited in its epistemological implications: it is pitched at a level of explanation that is insensitive to central epistemic distinctions.) I also argue that Williamson's semantic claim that intuitive judgements are judgements of counterfactuals is mistaken; rather, I propose, they are a certain kind of metaphysical possibility judgement. Several other competing proposals are also examined and criticized.","Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA","Malmgren, AS (reprint author), Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA.","annasara@austin.utexas.edu",,,,,"Aesop, 2002, AESOPS FABLES NEW TR; Alexander J, 2007, PHILOS COMPASS, V2, P56, DOI 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2006.00048.x; Alward Peter, 2000, PACIFIC PHILOS Q, V81, P1; Alward Peter, 2002, GENDLER HAWTHORNE 20, P71; ALWARD PMS, 1996, PHILOS STUD, V81, P121; Benacerraf P., 1964, PHILOS MATH SELECTED; Beyer Christian, 2007, PHILOS KNOWLEDGE ITS; Bishop Michael, 2009, STICH HIS CRITICS; Boghossian Paul, PHILOS PHEN IN PRESS; Boghossian Paul, REFLECTIONS RULES RE; Boghossian Paul, 2008, EPISTEMIC RULES, P109; Boghossian P., 1989, PHILOS TOPICS, V17, P5, DOI DOI 10.5840/PHILTOPICS198917110; Boghossian P., 2008, CONTENT JUSTIFICATIO; Boghossian PA, 2003, GRAZ PHIL S, V66, P15; BONJOUR L., 1985, STRUCTURE EMPIRICAL; Brown J. R., 1991, LAB MIND THOUGHT EXP; BURGE T, 1988, J PHILOS, V85, P649, DOI 10.5840/jphil1988851112 ; BYRNE A, 1993, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V71, P24, DOI 10.1080/00048409312345022 ; Byrne RMJ, 2005, RATIONAL IMAGINATION: HOW PEOPLE CREATE ALTERNATIVES TO REALITY, P1; Carlshamre Staffan, 2004, WEB SERIES, V32; Carruthers P., 1996, THEORIES THEORIES MI; Carruthers Peter, BEHAV BRAIN IN PRESS; Carruthers P, 2006, ARCHITECTURE MIND MA; Chalmers D. J., 1996, CONSCIOUS MIND SEARC; Chekhov Anton, 1883, A CHEKOV EARLY STORI; Cummins Robert, 2000, 2 CONCEPTIONS PSYCHO, P117; Cummins R., 1998, RETHINKING INTUITION, P113; CURRIE G, 1986, PHILOS STUD, V50, P195, DOI 10.1007/BF00354588 ; Currie Gregory, 1990, NATURE FICTION; Dancy J., 2004, ETHICS PRINCIPLES; Dancy Jonathan, 2001, PRACTICAL REALITY; Davies Martin, 2005, COGNITIVE SCI, P358; Davies M., 1994, PHILOS ISSUES, V5, P189; DAVIES M., 1998, FOLK PSYCHOL MENTAL, P53; Davies M., 2001, PHILOS TOPICS, V29, P127; DePaul M. R., 1998, RETHINKING INTUITION; DEVITT M, 1994, J PHILOS, V91, P545, DOI 10.2307/2940802 ; Eagle A., 2007, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V107, P125; Earman J, 2002, ERKENNTNIS, V57, P281, DOI 10.1023/A:1021526110200 ; Evans G., 1982, VARIETIES REFERENCE; Fodor Jerry, 1989, EXPLORATIONS COGNITI; Foot P., 1978, VIRTUES VICES; Geach P., 1962, REFERENCE GENERALITY; Gendler Szabo Tamar, 2002, CONCEIVABILITY POSSI; GETTIER E. L., 1963, ANALYSIS, V23, P121, DOI DOI 10.1093/ANALYS/23.6.121; Griffin Dale, 2002, HEURISTICS BIASES PS; GINET C., 1975, KNOWLEDGE PERCEPTION; Godel Kurt, 1964, WHAT IS CANTORS CONT, P470; Goldman A. I., 1989, MIND LANG, V4, P161, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-0017.1989.TB00249.X; Goldman Alvin, 2006, IMAGINATION SIMULATI, P41; Goldman A. I., 1992, MIND LANG, V7, P104, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-0017.1992.TB00200.X; GOLDMAN AI, 1976, J PHILOS, V73, P771, DOI 10.2307/2025679 ; GOLDMAN AI, 2007, GRAZ PHIL S, V74, P1; Gordon R., 1986, MIND LANG, V1, P158, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-0017.1986.TB00324.X; Graham George, 1998, SO FUNDAMENTALISM EN, P189; Grundmann Thomas, LOGIC STRUCTURE THOU; Gunderson Keith, 1975, LANGUAGE MIND KNOWLE; Haggkvist Soren, 1996, THOUGHT EXPT PHILOS; Hanley R, 2004, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V82, P112, DOI 10.1080/713659790 ; HARMAN G, 1968, AM PHILOS QUART, V5, P164; Heatherington Stephen, 2006, EPISTEMOLOGY FUTURES; Hill Christopher, 2006, MODALITY EPISTEMOLOG, P205; Hintikka J, 1999, J PHILOS, V96, P127, DOI 10.2307/2564660 ; Hooker B, 2000, MORAL PARTICULARISM; Ichikawa J, 2009, PHILOS STUD, V145, P435, DOI 10.1007/s11098-009-9403-9; Ichikawa J, 2009, PHILOS STUD, V142, P221, DOI 10.1007/s11098-007-9184-y; Jackson F, 1998, METAPHYSICS ETHICS D; Jackson Frank, 2005, OXFORD HDB CONT ANAL; Jackson Frank, 2000, ETHICAL PARTICULARIS, P79; Kaebnick GE, 1999, J VALUE INQUIRY, V33, P43, DOI 10.1023/A:1004345213068 ; Kagan S, 2001, SOC PHILOS POLICY, V18, P44, DOI 10.1017/S0265052500002892 ; KAMM FM, 1989, PHILOS STUD, V57, P227, DOI 10.1007/BF00372696 ; KATZ J., 1998, REALISTIC RATIONALIS; Keil F. C., 2000, EXPLANATION COGNITIO; Kornblith Hilary, 2006, APPEALS INTUITION AM, P10; KORNBLITH H, 2002, KNOWLEDGE ITS PLACE; Kornblith H, 2005, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V71, P427, DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2005.tb00460.x ; KRIPKE S., 1980, NAMING NECESSITY; Lewis David, 1983, TRUTH FICTION, P261; Lewis D., 1983, PHILOS PAPERS, V1; Lewis D., 1973, COUNTERFACTUALS; Lodge D., 2001, THINKS; Luper S., 2003, SKEPTICS CONT ESSAYS; Machery E, 2004, COGNITION, V92, pB1, DOI 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.003; Malmgren Anna-Sara, 2009, THESIS NEW YORK U; Margolis Eric, 2003, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V103, P299; Marr D., 1982, VISION COMPUTATIONAL; MCDOWELL J, 1979, MONIST, V62, P331, DOI 10.5840/monist197962319 ; MCDOWELL J, 1977, MIND, V86, P159; Nichols S, 2004, J AESTHET ART CRITIC, V62, P129, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-594X.2004.00146.x ; Nichols Shaun, 2003, METASKEPTICISM MEDIT, P227; Nichols S., 2006, ARCHITECTURE IMAGINA; Nichols Shaun, 1996, VARIETIES OFF LINE S, P39; Nichols S., 2003, MINDREADING INTEGRAT; Nichols Shaun, 2006, IMAGINATIVE BLOCKS I, P237; O'HEAR A, 1998, CURRENT ISSUES PHILO; Peacocke Christopher, 1998, PHILOS ISSUES, V9, P121; POLLOCK J., 1999, CONT THEORIES KNOWLE; Proudfoot D, 2006, J PHILOS LOGIC, V35, P9, DOI 10.1007/s10992-005-9005-8; Pryor James, 2005, THERE IS IMMEDIATE J, p[2005, 181]; Pust J., 2000, INTUITIONS EVIDENCE; Putnam H., 1975, MINNESOTA STUDIES PH, V7, P131; Recanati Francois, 1993, DIRECT REFERENCE; Rescher Nicholas, 1968, AM PHILOS Q MONOGRAP; Roese NJ, 1997, PSYCHOL BULL, V121, P133, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.133 ; Russel B, 1905, MIND, V14, P479, DOI DOI 10.1093/MIND/XIV.4.479; Sainsbury Mark, 2009, FICTION FICTIONALISM; SCHIFFER S, 1991, MIND, V100, P1; Steup Matthias, 2005, CONT DEBATES EPISTEM; SHOPE R., 1983, ANAL KNOWING DECADE; Sloman S., 2005, CAUSAL MODELS PEOPLE; Sosa D, 2006, PHILOSOPHY, V81, P633, DOI 10.1017/S0031819106318052; Sosa E., 2007, VIRTUE EPISTEMOLOGY, V1; SOSA E, 2007, GRAZ PHIL S, V74, P51; Sosa Ernest, 2009, DEFENSE INTUITIONS U, P101; Stalnaker R., 1968, AM PHILOS Q MONOGRAP, P98; Stanley J., 2001, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, VXXV, P36; Stanovich KE, 2000, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V23, P645, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X00003435 ; Strevens Michael, CETERIS PARIBUS HEDG; STICH S, 1988, SYNTHESE, V74, P391, DOI 10.1007/BF00869637 ; Swain S, 2008, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V76, P138, DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00118.x ; Thomasson AL, 2003, DIALECTICA, V57, P205, DOI 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2003.tb00266.x ; Thomson Judith Jarvis, 1973, MONIST, V59, P204; UNGER P, 1983, PHILOS STUD, V43, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF01112520 ; Unger Peter, 2002, PHILOS RELATIVITY; Vayrynen P, 2006, ETHICS, V116, P707, DOI 10.1086/505232; Walton K.L., 1990, MIMESIS MAKE BELIEVE; Weatherson B, 2003, PHILOS STUD, V115, P1, DOI 10.1023/A:1024961917413 ; Weinberg Jonathan, 2006, PUZZLING OVER IMAGIN, P175; WEINBERG J, 2001, PHILOS TOPICS, V29, P429, DOI DOI 10.5840/PHILTOPICS2001291/217; Williamson Timothy, 2003, ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V77, P249; WILLIAMSON T, 2007, GRAZER PHILOS STUD, V74, P89; WILLIAMSON T, 2007, PHILOS PHILOS; Williamson Timothy, 2003, KNOWLEDGE ITS LIMITS; Williamson T., 2005, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V105, P1, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.0066-7373.2004.00100.X; Williamson T, 2009, PHILOS STUD, V145, P431, DOI 10.1007/s11098-009-9402-x; Woodward J, 2002, ERKENNTNIS, V57, P303, DOI 10.1023/A:1021578127039 ; Wright C, 2004, DIALECTICA, V58, P155; Yablo Stephen, 2002, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V25, P72; Yablo S., 2002, CONCEIVABILITY POSSI, P441","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423","1460-2113",,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzr039",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","825XG","WOS:000295314800003",,"gold",,,"2018-01-02",282.0,"alexanderj alwardpeter alwardpeter alwardpms benacerrafp beyerchristian bishopmichael boghossianpaul boghossianpaul boghossianpaul boghossianp boghossianp boghossianpa bonjourl brownjr burget byrnea byrnermj carlshamrestaffan carruthersp carrutherspeter carruthersp chalmersdj chekhovanton cumminsrobert cumminsr currieg curriegregory dancyj dancyjonathan daviesmartin daviesm daviesm daviesm depaulmr devittm eaglea earmanj evansg fodorjerry footp geachp gendlerszabotamar gettierel griffindale ginetc godelkurt goldmanai goldmanalvin goldmanai goldmanai goldmanai gordonr grahamgeorge grundmannthomas gundersonkeith haggkvistsoren hanleyr harmang heatheringtonstephen hillchristopher hintikkaj hookerb ichikawaj ichikawaj jacksonf jacksonfrank jacksonfrank kaebnickge kagans kammfm katzj keilfc kornblithhilary kornblithh kornblithh kripkes lewisdavid lewisd lewisd lodged lupers macherye malmgrenannasara margoliseric marrd mcdowellj mcdowellj nicholss nicholsshaun nicholss nicholsshaun nicholss nicholsshaun oheara peacockechristopher pollockj proudfootd pryorjames pustj putnamh recanatifrancois reschernicholas roesenj russelb sainsburymark schiffers steupmatthias shoper slomans sosad sosae sosae sosaernest stalnakerr stanleyj stanovichke strevensmichael stichs swains thomassonal thomsonjudithjarvis ungerp ungerpeter vayrynenp waltonkl weathersonb weinbergjonathan weinbergj williamsontimothy williamsont williamsont williamsontimothy williamsont williamsont woodwardj wrightc yablostephen yablos aesop","cluster_0"
-0.3749107013231031,0.5207152613982402,44.0,18.0,18.0,0.0,2.0,2008.0,117.0,468.0,899.0,933.0,35.0,"J","Huemer, M",,,,"Huemer, Michael",,,"In Defence of Repugnance","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"SELF-TORTURER; POPULATION; INTRANSITIVITY; UTILITARIANISM; GENERATIONS; CONCLUSION; PUZZLE","I defend the 'Repugnant' Conclusion that for any possible population of happy people, a population containing a sufficient number of people with lives barely worth living would be better. Four lines of argument converge on this conclusion, and the conclusion has a simple, natural theoretical explanation. The opposition to the Repugnant Conclusion rests oil a bare appeal to intuition. This intuition is open to charges of being influenced by multiple distorting factors. Several theories of population ethics have been devised to avoid the Repugnant Conclusion, but each generates even more counterintuitive consequences. The intuition opposing the Repugnant Conclusion is thus among the best candidates for an intuition that should be revised.","Univ Colorado, Dept Philosophy, Boulder, CO 80309 USA","Huemer, M (reprint author), Univ Colorado, Dept Philosophy, Boulder, CO 80309 USA.",,,,,,"Andreou C, 2006, PHILOS PUBLIC AFF, V34, P95, DOI 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2006.00054.x ; ANGLIN B, 1977, CAN J PHILOS, V7, P745; Arrhenius G, 2000, ECON PHILOS, V16, P247, DOI 10.1017/S0266267100000249 ; Attfield R., 1991, ETHICS ENV CONCERN; BooninVail D, 1996, PHILOS PUBLIC AFF, V25, P267, DOI 10.1111/j.1088-4963.1996.tb00043.x ; Broome J, 1996, OXFORD ECON PAP, V48, P177, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a028564 ; Broome J., 2004, WEIGHING LIVES; Davidson Donald, 1955, PHILOS SCI, V22, P140; Ehrlich P. R., 1990, POPULATION EXPLOSION; Fotion N., 1997, CONTINGENT FUTURE PE; Geach P. T., 1956, ANALYSIS, V17, P33, DOI DOI 10.1093/ANALYS/17.2.33; Huemer M, 2003, PHILOS STUD, V114, P147, DOI 10.1023/A:1024417403106 ; Huemer M., 2005, ETHICAL INTUITIONISM; Huemer M, 2008, SOC PHILOS POLICY, V25, P368, DOI 10.1017/S026505250808014X; HURKA T, 1983, ETHICS, V93, P496, DOI 10.1086/292462 ; LOCKE D, 1987, PHILOSOPHY, V62, P131, DOI 10.1017/S0031819100063993 ; Mackie J., 1977, ETHICS INVENTING RIG; Moore G.E., 1960, PRINCIPIA ETHICA; Mulgan Tim, 2002, UTILITAS, VXIV, P360; NARVESON J, 1973, MONIST, V57, P62, DOI 10.5840/monist197357134 ; NARVESON J, 1967, MIND, V76, P62; Ng Y-K, 1990, UTILITAS, V2, P171; Ng Y-K., 1989, ECON PHILOS, V5, P135; Norcross A, 1997, PHILOS PUBLIC AFF, V26, P135, DOI 10.1111/j.1088-4963.1997.tb00079.x ; Nozick R., 1993, NATURE RATIONALITY; Parfit D., 1984, REASONS PERSONS; QUINN WS, 1990, PHILOS STUD, V59, P79, DOI 10.1007/BF00368392 ; Rachels S, 1998, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V76, P71, DOI 10.1080/00048409812348201 ; Rachels S, 1998, BIOETHICS, V12, P93, DOI 10.1111/1467-8519.00098 ; Rachels S, 2001, NOUS, V35, P214, DOI 10.1111/0029-4624.00294 ; Tannsjo T., 2004, REPUGNANT CONCLUSION; Ryberg Jesper, 1996, PHILOS PAPERS, V25, P161; SIDER TR, 1991, ANALYSIS, V51, P265, DOI 10.2307/3328770 ; Sidgwick H., 1981, METHODS ETHICS; SIKORA RI, 1981, ETHICS, V92, P128, DOI 10.1086/292302 ; Sikora R. I., 1978, OBLIGATIONS FUTURE G; Simon Julian L., 1996, ULTIMATE RESOURCE; Singer P., 1986, APPL ETHICS; Sinnott-Armstrong W., 2006, MORAL SKEPTICISMS; SLOVIC P, 1978, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V10, P281, DOI 10.1016/0001-4575(78)90030-1 ; Tannsjo Torbjorn, 2002, UTILITAS, V14, P339; TEMKIN LS, 1987, PHILOS PUBLIC AFF, V16, P138; Temkin LS, 1996, PHILOS PUBLIC AFF, V25, P175, DOI 10.1111/j.1088-4963.1996.tb00039.x ; THOMSON JJ, GOODNESS ADVICE","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzn079",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","400HP","WOS:000262858900006",,,,,"2018-01-02",283.0,"anglinb arrheniusg attfieldr booninvaild broomej broomej davidsondonald ehrlichpr fotionn geachpt huemerm huemerm huemerm hurkat locked mackiej moorege mulgantim narvesonj narvesonj ngyk ngyk norcrossa nozickr parfitd quinnws rachelss rachelss rachelss tannsjot rybergjesper sidertr sidgwickh sikorari sikorari simonjulianl singerp sinnottarmstrongw slovicp tannsjotorbjorn temkinls temkinls thomsonjj andreouc","cluster_6"
0.013471167568896707,0.017991016841287483,11.0,18.0,18.0,0.0,4.0,2008.0,117.0,467.0,613.0,632.0,20.0,"J","Fine, TL",,,,"Fine, Terrence L.",,,"Evaluating the Pasadena, Altadena, and St Petersburg gambles","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"EXPECTATIONS","By recourse to the fundamentals of preference orderings and their numerical representations through linear utility, we address certain questions raised in Nover and Hdjek 2004, Hdjek and Nover 2006, and Colyvan 2006. In brief, the Pasadena and Altadena games are well-defined and can be assigned any finite utility values while remaining consistent with preferences between those games having wen-defined finite expected value. This is also true for the St Petersburg game. Furthermore, the dominance claimed for the Altadena game over the Pasadena game, and that would have been claimed for the St Petersburg game over the Altadena, can be contradicted without fear of inconsistency with the axioms of utility theory. However, insistence upon dominance can be made to yield a contradiction of the Archimedean axiom of utility theory.","Cornell Univ, Sch Elect & Comp Engn, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA","Fine, TL (reprint author), Cornell Univ, Sch Elect & Comp Engn, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA.",,,,,,"Colyvan M, 2006, MIND, V115, P695, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzl695; Dubra J, 2004, J ECON THEORY, V115, P118, DOI 10.1016/S0022-0531(03)00166-2; Feller W., 1966, INTRO PROBABILITY TH, VII; Ferguson T. S., 1967, MATH STAT DECISION T; Fishburn P.C, 1970, UTILITY THEORY DECIS; FRISTEDT B, 1997, MODERN APPROACH PROB; Hajek A, 2006, MIND, V115, P703, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzl703; Herstein IN, 1953, ECONOMETRICA, V21, P291, DOI 10.2307/1905540 ; Kruger L., 1987, PROBABILISTIC REVOLU, V1; Nover H, 2004, MIND, V113, P237, DOI 10.1093/mind/113.450.237 ; Von Neuman J., 1944, THEORY GAMES EC BEHA","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzn037",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","342UI","WOS:000258808700004",,,,,"2018-01-02",284.0,"dubraj fellerw fergusonts fishburnpc fristedtb hajeka hersteinin krugerl noverh vonneumanj colyvanm","cluster_3"
-0.09239417358340926,-0.0694519955974862,21.0,18.0,18.0,0.0,1.0,2008.0,117.0,465.0,1.0,26.0,26.0,"J","Angere, S",,,,"Angere, Staffan",,,"Coherence as a Heuristic","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"PROBABILISTIC MEASURE; TRUTH","The impossibility results of Bovens and Hartmann (2003) and Olsson (2005) call into question the strength of the connection between coherence and truth. As part of the inquiry into this alleged link, I define a notion of degree of truth-conduciveness, relevant for measuring the usefulness of coherence measures as rules-of-thumb for assigning probabilities in situations of partial knowledge. I use the concept to compare the viability of some of the measures of coherence that have been suggested so far under different circumstances. It turns out that all of these, including the prior, are just about equally good in cases of very little knowledge. Nevertheless, there are differences in when they are applicable, and they also depart more from each other when more knowledge is added.","Lund Univ, Dept Philosophy, S-22222 Lund, Sweden","Angere, S (reprint author), Lund Univ, Dept Philosophy, S-22222 Lund, Sweden.","staffan.angere@fil.lu.se",,,,,"Akiba K, 2000, ANALYSIS, V60, P356, DOI 10.1111/1467-8284.00254 ; ANGERE S, IN PRESS SYNTHESE; BONJOUR L, 1985, STRUCTURE OF EMPIRIC; Bovens L., 2003, BAYESIAN EPISTEMOLOG; Carnap R., 1952, CONTINUUM INDUCTIVE; Carnap Rudolf, 1950, LOGICAL FDN PROBABIL; DIETRICH F, 2005, PHILOS SCI, V403, P24; Ewing A. C., 1934, IDEALISM CRITICAL SU; Fitelson B, 2003, ANALYSIS, V63, P194, DOI 10.1111/1467-8284.00420 ; Huemer M, 1997, SOUTHERN J PHILOS, V35, P463, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-6962.1997.tb00848.x ; KLEIN P, 1994, ANALYSIS, V54, P129, DOI 10.2307/3328660; KLEIN P, 1996, ANALYSIS, V56, P118, DOI 10.1111/j.0003-2638.1996.00118.x ; Lewis C. I., 1946, ANAL KNOWLEDGE VALUA; Matsumoto M., 1998, ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation, V8, P3, DOI 10.1145/272991.272995; Meijs W., 2005, THESIS U ROTTERDAM; Olsson EJ, 2002, J PHILOS, V99, P246, DOI 10.2307/3655648 ; OLSSON EJ, 2005, PROBABILITY JUSTIFIC; Schweiger F., 1995, HAUSDORFF MEASURES; Russell Bertrand, 1912, PROBLEMS PHILOS; Shogenji T, 1999, ANALYSIS, V59, P338, DOI 10.1111/1467-8284.00191 ; Shogenji T, 2001, ANALYSIS, V61, P147, DOI 10.1111/1467-8284.00286","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzn001",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","269UC","WOS:000253674800001",,,,,"2018-01-02",285.0,"angeres bonjourl bovensl carnapr carnaprudolf dietrichf ewingac fitelsonb huemerm kleinp kleinp lewisci matsumotom meijsw olssonej olssonej schweigerf russellbertrand shogenjit shogenjit akibak","cluster_3"
-0.2364865696736653,-0.23172358288292622,24.0,18.0,18.0,0.0,2.0,2006.0,115.0,459.0,567.0,605.0,39.0,"J","Field, H",,,,"Field, Hartry",,,"Truth and the unprovability of consistency","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"It might be thought that we could argue for the consistency of a mathematical theory T within T, by giving an inductive argument that all theorems of T are true and inferring consistency. By Gbdel's second incompleteness theorem any such argument must break down, but just how it breaks down depends on the kind of theory of truth that is built into T. The paper surveys the possibilities, and suggests that some theories of truth give far more intuitive diagnoses of the breakdown than do others. The paper concludes with some morals about the nature of validity and about a possible alternative to the idea that mathematical theories are indefinitely extensible.","NYU, Dept Philosophy, Silver Ctr 503, New York, NY 10003 USA","Field, H (reprint author), NYU, Dept Philosophy, Silver Ctr 503, 100 Washington Sq W, New York, NY 10003 USA.","hf18@nyu.edu",,,,,"BEALL J, 2005, DEFLATIONISM PARADOX; BEALL JC, IN PRESS LIARS REVEN; BEALL JC, 2005, TRANSPARENT DISQUOTA, P7; BEALL JC, IN PRESS TRUTH PARAD; Beall J. C., 2003, LIARS HEAPS; FIELD H, 1991, PHILOS STUD, V62, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF00646253 ; Field H, 2003, J PHILOS LOGIC, V32, P139, DOI 10.1023/A:1023027808400 ; FIELD H, IN PRESS SOLVING PAR; Field H, 2006, MONIST, V89, P9, DOI 10.5840/monist200689131 ; FRIEDMAN H, 1987, ANN PURE APPL LOGIC, V33, P1, DOI 10.1016/0168-0072(87)90073-X ; Gabbay D. M., 2002, HDB PHILOS LOGIC, V6; GUPTA A, 1982, J PHILOS LOGIC, V11, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF00302338 ; HERZBERGER HG, 1982, J PHILOS LOGIC, V11, P61, DOI 10.1007/BF00302339 ; JACQUETTE D, IN PRESS PHILOS LOGI; KRIPKE S, 1975, J PHILOS, V72, P690, DOI 10.2307/2024634 ; LAKATOS I, 1967, PROBLEMS PHILSO MATH; McGee V., 1991, TRUTH VAGUENESS PARA; Priest G, 1998, J PHILOS, V95, P410, DOI 10.2307/2564636 ; Priest G., 1987, CONTRADICTION; Priest G., 2002, PARACONSISTENT LOGIC, P287; QUINNE W, 1940, MATH LOGIC; REINHARDT WN, 1986, J PHILOS LOGIC, V15, P219, DOI 10.1007/BF00305492 ; Shapiro S, 2002, MIND, V111, P817, DOI 10.1093/mind/111.444.817 ; Soames S., 1999, UNDERSTANDING TRUTH","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzl567",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","073RX","WOS:000239761400002",,,,,"2018-01-02",286.0,"bealljc bealljc bealljc bealljc fieldh fieldh fieldh fieldh friedmanh gabbaydm guptaa herzbergerhg jacquetted kripkes lakatosi mcgeev priestg priestg priestg quinnew reinhardtwn shapiros soamess beallj","cluster_0"
-0.44341751159690435,-0.49142712924877907,38.0,18.0,18.0,0.0,0.0,2005.0,114.0,456.0,933.0,1003.0,71.0,"J","Kaplan, D",,,,"Kaplan, D",,,"Reading 'On Denoting' on its centenary","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"Part 1 sets out the logical/semantical background to 'On Denoting', including an exposition of Russell's views in Principles of Mathematics, the role and justification of Frege's notorious Axiom V, and speculation about how the search for a solution to the Contradiction might have motivated a new treatment of denoting. Part 2 consists primarily of an extended analysis of Russell's views on knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description, in which I try to show that the discomfiture between Russell's semantical and epistemological commitments begins as far back as 1903. I close with a non-Russellian critique of Russell's views on how we are able to make use of linguistic representations in thought and with the suggestion that a theory of comprehension is needed to supplement semantic theory.","Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Philosophy, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA","Kaplan, D (reprint author), Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Philosophy, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA.","kaplan@ucla.edu",,,,,"Almog J., 1989, THEMES KAPLAN; AUSTIN DF, PHILOS ANAL; BOOLOS G, 1984, J PHILOS, V81, P430, DOI 10.2307/2026308 ; BURGE T, 1984, PHILOS REV, V93, P3, DOI 10.2307/2184411 ; CAPLAN B, 2002, THESIS U CALIFORNIA; CLARK RONALD W., 1975, LIFE B RUSSELL; Cole P., 1978, SYNTAX SEMANTICS, V9; DONNELLAN KS, 1966, PHILOS REV, V75, P281, DOI 10.2307/2183143 ; FREGE G, 1980, FREGES PHILOS MATH C; Frege G., 1893, GRUNDGESETZE ARITHME, V1; Frege G., 1892, Z PHILOS PHILOS KRIT, V100, P25; FREGE G, 1879, BEGRIFFSSCHIFT; Frege G., 1884, GRUNDLAGEN ARITHMETI; GEACH P., 1952, TRANSLATIONS PHILOS; HAHN LE, 1986, PHILOS W V QUINE; KAPLAN D, 1969, SYNTHESE, V19, P178; Kaplan D., 1990, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V64, P93, DOI DOI 10.2307/4106880; Kaplan David, 1964, THESIS U CALIFORNIA; Margalit Avishai, 1979, MEANING USE; MATES B, 1950, U CALIFORNIA PUBLICA, V25; PARSONS C, 1982, SYNTHESE, V52, P325, DOI 10.1007/BF00869200 ; Pears D. F, 1972, B RUSSELL COLLECTION; Quine Willard Van Orman, 1960, WORD OBJECT; RAMSEY FP, 1925, P LOND MATH SOC, V25, P384; RICKLESS S, 1996, SINN GUILT THEORY CO; Russell B., 1919, INTRO MATH PHILOS; Russell B., 1903, PRINCIPLES MATH; Russell B, 1910, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V11, P108; Russell Bertrand, 1912, PROBLEMS PHILOS; Russel B, 1905, MIND, V14, P479, DOI DOI 10.1093/MIND/XIV.4.479; RUSSELL B, 1959, MIND, V66, P385; Russell Bertrand, 1904, COMMUNICATION, P166; Russell B, 1994, COLLECTED PAPERS B R, V4; Schilpp Paul Arthur, 1944, PHILOS B RUSSELL; SCHILPP PA, 1942, PHILOS G E MOORE; URQUHART A, IN PRESS LOGIC DENOT; VANHEIJENOORTH, 1967, FREGE GODEN SOURCE B; Whitehead Alfred, 1910, PRINCIPIA MATH, V1","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzi933",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","023FL","WOS:000236111100006",,,,,"2018-01-02",287.0,"austindf boolosg burget caplanb clarkronaldw colep donnellanks fregeg fregeg fregeg fregeg fregeg geachp hahnle kapland kapland kaplandavid margalitavishai matesb parsonsc pearsdf quinewillardvanorman ramseyfp ricklesss russellb russellb russellb russellbertrand russelb russellb russellbertrand russellb schilpppaularthur schilpppa urquharta vanheijenoorth whiteheadalfred almogj","cluster_0"
-0.14559917691952204,-0.016756161352380238,9.0,18.0,18.0,1.0,3.0,2000.0,109.0,435.0,415.0,442.0,28.0,"J","Clark, M; Shackel, N",,,,"Clark, M; Shackel, N",,,"The Two-envelope paradox","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"2-ENVELOPE PARADOX","Previous claims to have resolved the two-envelope paradox have been premature. The paradoxical argument has been exposed as manifestly fallacious if there is an upper limit to the amount of money that may be put in an envelope; but the paradoxical cases which can be described if this limitation is removed do not involve mathematical error, nor can they be explained away in terms of the strangeness of infinity. Only by taking account of the partial sums of the infinite series of expected gains can the paradox be resolved.","Univ Nottingham, Dept Philosophy, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England; De Montfort Univ, Dept Math, Leicester LE1 9BH, Leics, England","Clark, M (reprint author), Univ Nottingham, Dept Philosophy, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England.",,,"Shackel, Nicholas/0000-0002-1751-1400",,,"Arntzenius F, 1997, ANALYSIS, V57, P42, DOI 10.1111/1467-8284.00049 ; Binmore K., 1982, MATH ANAL STRAIGHTFO; BROOME J, 1995, ANALYSIS, V55, P6, DOI 10.2307/3328613 ; CASTELL P, 1994, ANALYSIS, V54, P46, DOI 10.2307/3328103 ; DEGROOT MH, 1989, PROBABILITY STATISTI; HAGGARTY R, 1993, FUNDAMENTALS MATH AN; JACKSON F, 1994, ANALYSIS, V54, P43, DOI 10.2307/3328102; Kraitchik M., 1943, MATH RECREATIONS; Scott AD, 1997, ANALYSIS, V57, P34, DOI 10.1111/1467-8284.00048","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/109.435.415",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","359NB","WOS:000089616000001",,,,,"2018-01-02",288.0,"binmorek broomej castellp degrootmh haggartyr jacksonf kraitchikm scottad arntzeniusf","cluster_3"
-0.24277068122507234,-0.021308573497788617,34.0,18.0,18.0,0.0,0.0,1989.0,98.0,391.0,331.0,348.0,18.0,"J","CANDLISH, S",,,,"CANDLISH, S",,,"THE TRUTH ABOUT BRADLEY,F.H.","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"CANDLISH, S (reprint author), UNIV WESTERN AUSTRALIA,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,NEDLANDS,WA 6009,AUSTRALIA.",,,,,,"ALLARD J, 1980, IDEALISTIC STUDIES; AYER AJ, 1946, LANGUAGE TRUTH LOGIC, P36; Blackburn Simon, 1984, PHILOS FH BRADLEY, P155; BLACKBURN S, 1988, TIMES LIT SUPPL 0129; BLACKBURN S, 1984, SPREADING WORD, P235; Bradley F.H., 1883, PRINCIPLES LOGIC; CANDLISH S, 1984, BRADLEYS LOGIC PHILO; CANDLISH S, 1981, IDEALISTIC STUD, P252; CANDLISH S, 1982, IDEALISTIC STUD, P254; CRESSWELL M, 1979, CANADIAN J PHILOS; CRESSWELL M, 1977, AUSTRALASIAN J PHILO; DANCY J, 1985, INTRO CONT EPISTEMOL, P110; HAACK S, 1978, PHILOS LOGICS, P86; HAMLYN DW, 1970, THEORY KNOWLEDGE, P123; Kneale W., 1962, DEV LOGIC; MANSER AR, 1983, BRADLEYS LOGIC, P133; MOORE GE, 1922, PHILOS STUD, P300; MOORE GE, 1899, MIND, P182; OCONNOR DJ, 1982, INTRO THEORY KNOWLED, P166; PASSMORE J, 1957, 100 YEARS PHILOS, P116; Rescher Nicholas, 1973, COHERENCE THEORY TRU, P23; RICHARDS TJ, 1982, LANGUAGE REASON, P166; RUSSELL, 1957, MENTAL ACTS; RUSSELL, 1966, PHILOS ESSAYS, P142; RUSSELL, 1926, OUR KNOWLEDGE EXTERN, P48; RUSSELL, 1904, MIND; RUSSELL, 1937, PRINCIPLES MATH; RUSSELL B, 1959, MY PHILOS DEV, P62; Russell B., 1910, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC; WALKER R, 1985, MIND, P2; WHITE AR, 1967, ENCYCL PHILOS, P132; WHITE AR, 1971, TRUTH, P109; WOLLHEIM R, 1969, FH BRADLEY, P167; WOOZLEY AD, 1949, THEORY KNOWLEDGE, P125","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","AJ942","WOS:A1989AJ94200001",,,,,"2018-01-02",289.0,"ayeraj blackburnsimon blackburns blackburns bradleyfh candlishs candlishs candlishs cresswellm cresswellm dancyj haacks hamlyndw knealew manserar moorege moorege oconnordj passmorej reschernicholas richardstj russell russell russell russell russell russellb russellb walkerr whitear whitear wollheimr woozleyad allardj","cluster_6"
-0.3148243620557478,-0.2191673874530887,9.0,18.0,18.0,0.0,0.0,1989.0,98.0,390.0,289.0,305.0,17.0,"J","WRIGHT, C",,,,"WRIGHT, C",,,"WITTGENSTEIN ON MEANING - MCGINN,C","MIND",,,"English","Book Review",,,,,,,,,"UNIV MICHIGAN,ANN ARBOR,MI 48109","WRIGHT, C (reprint author), UNIV ST ANDREWS,ST ANDREWS KY16 9ST,FIFE,SCOTLAND.",,,,,,"BAKER GP, 1983, ANAL COMMENTARY WITT, P284; BENACERRAF, 1965, PHILOS REV, P47; BLACKBURN S, 1984, SYNTHESE, P281; BOGHOSSIAN PA, IN PRESS PHILOS REV; FORBES G, 1983, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V4, P221; KRIPKE S, 1981, WITTGENSTEIN RULES P, P21; McGinn C., 1984, WITTGENSTEIN MEANING; WRIGHT C, 1984, J PHILOS, P759; Wright C., 1987, LOGIC PHILOS SCI EPI, P391","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","U7855","WOS:A1989U785500010",,,,,"2018-01-02",290.0,"benacerraf blackburns boghossianpa forbesg kripkes mcginnc wrightc wrightc bakergp","cluster_0"
-0.2241582376067474,-0.19924923466442587,14.0,18.0,18.0,0.0,1.0,1988.0,97.0,385.0,1.0,28.0,28.0,"J","WETTSTEIN, H",,,,"WETTSTEIN, H",,,"COGNITIVE SIGNIFICANCE WITHOUT COGNITIVE CONTENT","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"WETTSTEIN, H (reprint author), UNIV NOTRE DAME,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,NOTRE DAME,IN 46556, USA.",,,,,,"BOGDAN R, 1986, BELIEF; DUMMETT M, 1978, TRUTH OTHER ENIGMAS, P458; FRENCH P, 1984, MIDWEST STUDIES PHIL, V9, P479; FRENCH P, 1979, CONT PERSPECTIVES PH, P45; Geach P, 1966, TRANSLATIONS PHILOS; PERRY J, 1974, PHILOS REV, P3; SCHIFFER S, 1986, BELIEF FORM CONTENT, P83; Searle JR, 1969, SPEECH ACTS; STICH S, 1983, FOLK PSYCHOL COGNITI, pCH5; WETTSTEIN H, IN PRESS HAS SEMANTI, pCH2; WETTSTEIN H, 1986, J PHILOS, P185; 1979, PHILOS REV, P398; 1954, MESSAGE BOTTLE; 1984, SYNTHESE, P63","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","N6894","WOS:A1988N689400001",,,,,"2018-01-02",291.0,"dummettm frenchp frenchp geachp perryj schiffers searlejr stichs wettsteinh wettsteinh bogdanr","cluster_0"
-0.6756078767732053,-0.5675091470318664,13.0,18.0,18.0,0.0,0.0,1986.0,95.0,379.0,361.0,372.0,12.0,"J","PENDLEBURY, M",,,,"PENDLEBURY, M",,,"AGAINST THE POWER OF FORCE, REFLECTIONS ON THE MEANING OF MOOD","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"PENDLEBURY, M (reprint author), UNIV WITWATERSRAND,JOHANNESBURG 2001,SOUTH AFRICA.",,,,,,"BOER SE, 1978, LINGUISTICS PHILOS, P307; Castaneda H.-N., 1975, THINKING DOING; CLARK R, 1981, ACTA PHILOS FENNICA, P44; DAVIDSON D., 1984, INQUIRIES TRUTH INTE; Davies M., 1981, MEANING QUANTIFICATI; Dummett Michael, 1973, FREGE PHILOS LANGUAG; HORNSBY J, 1986, MIND JAN, P92; HUNTLEY M, 1984, LINGUIST PHILOS, P103; Karttunen Lauri, 1977, LINGUIST PHILOS, V1, P3, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00351935; Lewis D., 1983, PHILOS PAPERS, V1; McDowell John, 1976, TRUTH MEANING; Searle J. R., 1983, INTENTIONALITY; STENIUS E, 1967, SYNTHESE, P254","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","D3824","WOS:A1986D382400005",,,,,"2018-01-02",292.0,"castanedahn clarkr davidsond daviesm dummettmichael hornsbyj huntleym karttunenlauri lewisd mcdowelljohn searlejr steniuse boerse","cluster_3"
-0.04578504470641079,-0.0050390814678602696,22.0,18.0,21.0,0.0,2.0,1983.0,92.0,367.0,321.0,346.0,26.0,"J","DUPRE, J",,,,"DUPRE, J",,,"THE DISUNITY OF SCIENCE + EPISTEMOLOGICAL PROBLEM OF SCIENCE LIMITS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"DUPRE, J (reprint author), STANFORD UNIV HOSP,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,STANFORD,CA 94305, USA.",,"Dupre, John/K-1795-2017","Dupre, John/0000-0002-7451-2127",,,"Causey R. C., 1977, UNITY SCI; Dawkins Richard, 1982, EXTENDED PHENOTYPE; Dawkins Richard, 1976, SELFISH GENE; DUPRE J, 1981, PHILOS REV, V90, P66, DOI 10.2307/2184373 ; GENDRON B, 1970, BOSTON STUDIES PHILO, V8, P483; GEORGE W, 1965, ELEMENTARY GENETICS; GHISELIN MICHAEL T., 1966, SYST ZOOL, V15, P207, DOI 10.2307/2411392; GHISELIN MT, 1974, SYST ZOOL, V23, P536, DOI 10.2307/2412471; GOOSENS WK, 1978, PHILOS SCI, V45, P73, DOI 10.1086/288780 ; HEALEY R, 1978, ARISTOTELIAN SOC P, V79, P191; HULL DL, 1976, SYST ZOOL, V25, P174, DOI 10.2307/2412744 ; HULL DL, 1972, PHILOS SCI, V39, P491, DOI 10.1086/288470; HULL DL, 1982, CONT PHILOSOPHY NEW, V2, P281; Hull D. L., 1974, PHILOS BIOL SCI; KIM J, 1978, AM PHILOS QUART, V15, P149; Nickles T., 1973, J PHILOS, V70, P181; OPPENHEIM P, 1958, MINN STUD PHILOS SCI, V2, P3; Popper K. R., 1974, STUDIES PHILOS BIOL, P259; Ruse ME, 1971, DIALECTICA, V25, P39, DOI 10.1111/j.1746-8361.1971.tb00591.x; SCHAFFNER KF, 1967, PHILOS SCI, V34, P137, DOI 10.1086/288137 ; Smart J. J. C., 1963, PHILOS SCI REALISM; Wilson E. O., 1975, SOCIOBIOLOGY NEW SYN","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","RA275","WOS:A1983RA27500001",,,,,"2018-01-02",293.0,"dawkinsrichard dawkinsrichard duprej gendronb georgew ghiselinmichaelt ghiselinmt goosenswk healeyr hulldl hulldl hulldl hulldl kimj nicklest oppenheimp popperkr ruseme schaffnerkf smartjjc wilsoneo causeyrc","cluster_0"
-0.0551029684633577,-8.234666136762988E-4,15.0,18.0,18.0,0.0,0.0,1966.0,75.0,297.0,75.0,96.0,22.0,"J","RESCHER, N",,,,"RESCHER, N",,,"LOGIC OF CHRONOLOGICAL PROPOSITIONS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"UNIV PITTSBURGH,PITTSBURGH,PA",,,,,,,"COHEN J, 1951, ANALYSIS, V11, P80; DUNCANJONES AE, ANALYSIS, V10, P21; HINTIKKA J, 1958, PHILOSOPHICAL REV, V67, P401; HINTIKKA S, 1959, AJATUS, V20, P65; Jordan Zbigniew, 1963, NOTRE DAME J FORM L, V4, P1; KANGER S, 1960, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V25, P342; MOODY EA, 1953, TRUTH CONSEQUENCE ME, P53; PRIOR AN, TIME MODALITY; Rescher N., 1962, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V27, P373; RESCHER N, 1963, STUDIES HISTORY ARAB; SAUNDERS JT, 1958, PHILOS REV, V67, P367, DOI 10.2307/2182397 ; SMITH PN, ANALYSIS, V10, P100; SPRENGER A, 1854, DICTIONARY TECHNICAL; QUAESTIUM AVERROES; 1562, ARISTOTELIS OPERA AV","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","ZE548","WOS:A1966ZE54800005",,,,,"2018-01-02",294.0,"duncanjonesae hintikkaj hintikkas jordanzbigniew kangers moodyea prioran reschern reschern saundersjt smithpn sprengera quaestiumaverroes cohenj","cluster_0"
0.01946235609689981,0.021213833683981106,6.0,18.0,18.0,0.0,0.0,1959.0,68.0,270.0,234.0,240.0,7.0,"J","HAMBLIN, CL",,,,"HAMBLIN, CL",,,"THE MODAL PROBABLY","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"ANDERSON AR, 1956, 2 US OFF NAV RES TEC; BURNS AL, 1958, WORLD POLITICS; Shackle G.L.S., 1952, METROECONOMICA, V4, P87; SHACKLE GLS, 1953, METROECONOMICA, V5, P87; Shackle G. L. S, 1955, UNCERTAINTY EC; von Wright G., 1951, ESSAY MODAL LOGIC","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","CCP47","WOS:A1959CCP4700008",,,,,"2018-01-02",295.0,"burnsal shacklegls shacklegls shacklegls vonwrightg andersonar","cluster_0"
-1.3057110103986167,-1.1496253985812048,82.0,17.0,18.0,0.0,2.0,2010.0,119.0,475.0,657.0,748.0,92.0,"J","Williamson, T",,,,"Williamson, Timothy",,,"Necessitism, Contingentism, and Plural Quantification","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"TRUTH THEORIES; ACTUALISM; MODALISM; LOGIC; SETS","Necessitism is the view that necessarily everything is necessarily something; contingentism is the negation of necessitism. The dispute between them is reminiscent of, but clearer than, the more familiar one between possibilism and actualism. A mapping often used to 'translate' actualist discourse into possibilist discourse is adapted to map every sentence of a first-order modal language to a sentence the contingentist (but not the necessitist) may regard as equivalent to it but which is neutral in the dispute. This mapping enables the necessitist to extract a 'cash value' from what the contingentist says. Similarly, a mapping often used to 'translate' possibilist discourse into actualist discourse is adapted to map every sentence of the language to a sentence the necessitist (but not the contingentist) may regard as equivalent to it but which is neutral in the dispute. This mapping enables the contingentist to extract a 'cash value' from what the necessitist says. Neither mapping is a translation in the usual sense, since necessitists and contingentists use the same language with the same meanings. The former mapping is extended to a second-order modal language under a plural interpretation of the second-order variables. It is proved that the latter mapping cannot be. Thus although the necessitist can extract a 'cash value' from what the contingentist says in the second-order language, the contingentist cannot extract a 'cash value' from some of what the necessitist says, even when it raises significant questions. This poses contingentism a serious challenge.","Univ Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, England","Williamson, T (reprint author), Univ Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, England.","timothy.williamson@philosophy.ox.ac.uk",,,,,"BARWISE J, 1979, J PHILOS LOGIC, V8, P47; Barwise J., 1985, MODEL THEORETIC LOGI; Bennett K, 2006, PHILOS STUD, V129, P263, DOI 10.1007/s11098-004-1641-2 ; Bennett K, 2005, PHILOS REV, V114, P297, DOI 10.1215/00318108-114-3-297 ; Bermudez Jose Luis, 2005, THOUGHT REFERENCE EX; BOOLOS G, 1985, PHILOS REV, V94, P327, DOI 10.2307/2185003 ; BOOLOS G, 1984, J PHILOS, V81, P430, DOI 10.2307/2026308 ; BRICKER P., 1989, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V14, P372; Chalmers David David Manley, 2009, METAMETAPHYSICS NEW; Crossley J. N, 1977, REPORTS MATH LOGIC, VVIII, P11; Davidson Donald, 1970, NOUS, V4, P25; DAVIDSON D, 1980, ESSAYS ACTIONS EVENT; DAVIES M, 1980, PHILOS STUD, V38, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF00354523 ; DAVIES MK, 1978, J PHILOS LOGIC, V7, P415; Fara M, 2005, MIND, V114, P1, DOI 10.1093/mind/fz001; Fine K, 2005, J PHILOS, V102, P547, DOI 10.5840/jphil2005102118 ; FINE K, 1981, NOUS, V15, P177, DOI 10.2307/2215323 ; FINE K, 1977, J PHILOS LOGIC, V6, P135, DOI 10.1007/BF00262054 ; Fine Kit, 1985, ALVIN PLANTINGA, P145; FINE K, 1918, J PHILOS LOGIC, V10, P293; Fine Kit, 2003, OXFORD HDB METAPHYSI, P161; FORBES G, 1992, PHILOS STUD, V68, P57, DOI 10.1007/BF00354469 ; Forbes Graeme, 1989, LANGUAGES POSSIBILIT; Forbes Graeme, 1985, METAPHYSICS MODALITY; Forbes G, 2008, PHILOS REV, V117, P275, DOI 10.1215/00318108-2007-038; FOX JF, 1987, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V65, P188, DOI 10.1080/00048408712342871 ; FRAUCHIGER M, THEMES B MA IN PRESS; GUPTA A, 1978, J PHILOS LOGIC, V7, P441; Gupta A., 1980, LOGIC COMMON NOUNS; HALLER R, 1990, P 14 INT WITTG S; Henkin L., 1961, P S FDN MATH, P167; HODES H, 1984, J PHILOS LOGIC, V13, P423; Kripke Saul A., 1971, IDENTITY INDIVIDUATI, P135; KRIPKE S., 1980, NAMING NECESSITY; Kripke S., 1963, ACTA PHILOS FENN, V16, P83; Lewis D., 1986, PLURALITY WORLDS; Linsky B, 1996, PHILOS STUD, V84, P283, DOI 10.1007/BF00354491 ; Linsky B., 1994, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, P431; Loux M.J., 2003, OXFORD HDB METAPHYSI; Lowe E, 2009, TRUTH TRUTH MAKING; MELIA J, 1992, PHILOS STUD, V68, P35, DOI 10.1007/BF00354468 ; MUNITZ MK, 1971, IDENTITY INDIVIDUATI; O'Hear Anthony, 2002, LOGIC THOUGHT LANGUA; PEACOCKE C, 1978, J PHILOS LOGIC, V7, P473; Peters S., 2006, QUANTIFIERS LANGUAGE; PLANTINGA, 1976, THEORIA-SPAIN, V42, P139; PLANTINGA, 1985, ALVIN PLANTINGA, P313; Plantinga A., 1974, NATURE NECESSITY; Pollock J., 1985, A PLANTINGA, P121; Prior A.N., 1957, TIME MODALITY; Rami A., 2009, TRUTH TRUTH MAKING, P1; Rayo Agustin, 1999, NOTRE DAME J FORM L, V40, P315, DOI DOI 10.1305/NDJFL/1022615612.75; RAYO A, 2005, THOUGHT REFERENCE EX, P84; Rayo A., 2006, ABSOLUTE GEN; Rumfitt I, 2001, SYNTHESE, V126, P283, DOI 10.1023/A:1005283412921 ; SALMON N, 1989, PHILOS REV, V98, P3, DOI 10.2307/2185369 ; Salmon Nathan, 2005, METAPHYSICS MATH MEA; Salmon N., 1993, PHILOS TOPICS, V21, P187; Salmon N., 1987, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V1, P49; Shapiro Stewart, 1991, FDN FDN CASE 2 ORDER; Sinnott-Armstrong Walter, 1994, MODALITY MORALITY BE; Stalnaker Robert C., 1994, WAYS WORLD MIGHT BE, P144; STALNAKER R, 1984, WAYS WORLD MIGHT BE; STALNAKER R, PHILOS PHEN IN PRESS; STALNAKER RC, 2003, WAYS WORLD MIGHT BE; THOMSON J, 2006, CONTENT MODALITY THE; TOMBERLIN J, 1985, A PLANTINGA; Now Vlach, 1973, THESIS UCLA; WILLIAMSON, 1999, DIALECTICA, V53, P253; WILLIAMSON, 1999, ANALYSIS, V59, P3; WILLIAMSON, 1998, ERKENNTNIS, V48, P257; Williamson T, 2000, TOPOI-INT REV PHILOS, V19, P201, DOI 10.1023/A:1006405915896 ; Williamson T., 1990, IDENTITY DISCRIMINAT; Williamson Timothy, 2003, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V17, P415, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1520-8583.2003.00017.X; WILLIAMSON T, 1990, P 14 INT WITTG S, V1, P168; WILLIAMSON T, 1988, LOGIQUE ANALYSE, V121, P89; Williamson T., 2006, CONTENT MODALITY THE, P123; WILLIAMSON T, 2007, PHILOS PHILOS; WILLIAMSON T, PHILOS PHEN IN PRESS; Williamson T., 2002, LOGIC THOUGHT LANGUA, P233; WILLIAMSON T, THEMES B MA IN PRESS; Williamson Timothy, 2000, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V100, P117, DOI [10.1111/paso.2000.100.issue-1, DOI 10.1111/PASO.2000.100.ISSUE-1]","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzq042",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","705JR","WOS:000286125200004",,,,,"2018-01-02",296.0,"barwisej bennettk bennettk bermudezjoseluis boolosg boolosg brickerp chalmersdaviddavidmanley crossleyjn davidsondonald davidsond daviesm daviesmk faram finek finek finek finekit finek finekit forbesg forbesgraeme forbesgraeme forbesg foxjf frauchigerm guptaa guptaa hallerr henkinl hodesh kripkesaula kripkes kripkes lewisd linskyb linskyb louxmj lowee meliaj munitzmk ohearanthony peacockec peterss plantinga plantinga plantingaa pollockj prioran ramia rayoagustin rayoa rayoa rumfitti salmonn salmonnathan salmonn salmonn shapirostewart sinnottarmstrongwalter stalnakerrobertc stalnakerr stalnakerr stalnakerrc thomsonj tomberlinj nowvlach williamson williamson williamson williamsont williamsont williamsontimothy williamsont williamsont williamsont williamsont williamsont williamsont williamsont williamsontimothy barwisej","cluster_3"
-0.7060667972224384,-0.5128393255246825,21.0,17.0,17.0,0.0,0.0,2010.0,119.0,473.0,1.0,42.0,42.0,"J","DeRose, K",,,,"DeRose, Keith",,,"The Conditionals of Deliberation","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"Practical deliberation often involves conditional judgements about what will (likely) happen if certain alternatives are pursued. It is widely assumed that the conditionals useful in deliberation are counterfactual or subjunctive conditionals. Against this, I argue that the conditionals of deliberation are indicatives. Key to the argument is an account of the relation between 'straightforward' future-directed conditionals like 'If the house is not painted, it will soon look quite shabby' and ''were'ed-up' FDCs like 'If the house were not to be painted, it would soon look quite shabby': an account on which both of these types of FDCs are grouped with the indicatives for semantic treatment and on which, while conditionals of both types are properly used in means/ends deliberations, those of the 'were'ed-up variety are especially well suited for that purpose.","Yale Univ, New Haven, CT 06520 USA","DeRose, K (reprint author), Yale Univ, New Haven, CT 06520 USA.","keith.derose@yale.edu",,,,,"ADAMS RM, 1977, AM PHILOS QUART, V14, P109; BRAITHWAITE RB, 1931, FDN MATH OTHER LOGIC; Craig E., 1998, ROUTLEDGE ENCY PHILO; Cross CB, 2002, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V80, P101, DOI 10.1080/713659353 ; DeRose K, 1999, NOUS, V33, P405, DOI 10.1111/0029-4624.00161 ; CAPPELEN H., 2002, PHILOS REV, V111, P167; DUDMAN VH, 1994, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V72, P17, DOI 10.1080/00048409412345851 ; EDGINGTON D, 1995, MIND, V104, P235, DOI 10.1093/mind/104.414.235 ; Harper W. L., 1981, IFS CONDITIONALS BEL; HOOKER CA, 1978, FDN APPL DECISION TH, V1; Jackson F., 1987, CONDITIONALS; JACKSON F, 1998, ROUTLEDGE ENCY PHILO; LEWIS D, 1976, PHILOS REV, V85, P297, DOI 10.2307/2184045 ; LEWIS D, 1979, NOUS, V13, P455, DOI 10.2307/2215339 ; LEWIS D, 1981, NOUS, V15, P377, DOI 10.2307/2215439 ; Lewis D., 1973, COUNTERFACTUALS; Lycan William, 2001, REAL CONDITIONALS; Plantinga A., 1974, NATURE NECESSITY; RESCHER N, 1969, ESSAYS CG HEMPEL; STALNAKER R, 1975, PHILOSOPHIA, V5, P269, DOI 10.1007/BF02379021 ; Stalnaker R., 1999, CONTEXT CONTENT","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzp149",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","605BP","WOS:000278322600001",,,,,"2018-01-02",297.0,"braithwaiterb craige crosscb derosek cappelenh dudmanvh edgingtond harperwl hookerca jacksonf jacksonf lewisd lewisd lewisd lewisd lycanwilliam plantingaa reschern stalnakerr stalnakerr adamsrm","cluster_3"
-0.38750637430380985,0.23116492498774335,36.0,17.0,17.0,0.0,0.0,2009.0,118.0,469.0,1.0,30.0,30.0,"J","Bykvist, K",,,,"Bykvist, Krister",,,"No Good Fit: Why the Fitting Attitude Analysis of Value Fails","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"EMOTIONS","Understanding value in terms of fitting attitudes is all the rage these days. According to this fitting attitude analysis of value (FA-analysis for short) what is good is what it is fitting to favour in some sense. Many aspects of the FA-analysis have been discussed. In particular, a lot of discussion has been concerned with the wrong-reason objection: it can be fitting to have an attitude towards something for reasons that have nothing to do with the Value the thing has in itself. Much less attention has been paid to the problem of identifying the relevant attitudes in virtue of which value is supposed to be defined. An old complaint, however, is that the FA-analysis is bound to be circular, because the fitting attitude is best seen as an evaluative judgement or an evaluative experience. In this paper, I am arguing that the challenge to find a non-circular account is deepened by the fact that on many Popular non-evaluative understandings of favouring, there are good states of affairs that it is never fitting to favour, because it is logically impossible or irrational to favour them. I will also show that the remaining candidate of favouring, 'imaginative emotional feeling,' will generate a new version of the wrong-reason objection if it is put to use in the FA-account. I shall conclude that the prospects of finding a non-circular FA-analysis look bleak.","Univ Oxford Jesus Coll, Oxford OX1 3DW, England","Bykvist, K (reprint author), Univ Oxford Jesus Coll, Turl St, Oxford OX1 3DW, England.","krister.bykvist@jesus.ox.ac.uk",,,,,"Brentano Franz Clemens, 1969, ORIGIN OUR KNOWLEDGE; Broad C. D., 1930, 5 TYPES ETHICAL THEO; CHISHOLM RM, 1964, J PHILOS, V61, P613, DOI 10.2307/2023443 ; CHISHOLM RM, 1981, ANALYSIS, V41, P99, DOI 10.2307/3327241 ; Chisholm Roderick M, 1986, BRENTANO INTRINSIC V; Crisp R, 2000, PHILOSOPHY, V75, P458; D'Arms J, 2000, ETHICS, V110, P722, DOI 10.1086/233371 ; Danielsson S, 2007, MIND, V116, P511, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzm511; DAVIS W, 1981, PHILOS STUD, V39, P305, DOI 10.1007/BF00354361 ; Ewing AC, 1939, MIND, V48, P1; Ewing A. C., 1959, 2 THOUGHTS MORAL PHI; Ewing A. C., 1947, DEFINITION GOOD; FEHIGE C, 1998, PREFERENCES PERSPECT; Feldman F., 2004, PLEASURE GOOD LIFE; Gibbard A, 1998, PERSPEKT ANALYT PHIL, V19, P239; GIBBARD A, 1990, WISE CHOICES APT FEE; Goldie Peter, 2000, EMOTIONS; Goldman A., 1970, THEORY HUMAN ACTION; GORDON RM, 1974, AM PHILOS QUART, V11, P27; Greenspan Patricia, 1988, EMOTIONS REASONS INQ; Honderich T, 1985, MORALITY OBJECTIVITY; Hurka T, 2003, ETHICS, V113, P599, DOI 10.1086/345624 ; Hurka T., 2001, VIRTUE VICE VALUE; Lemos N, 1994, INTRINSIC VALUE CONC; McDowell J., 1985, MORALITY OBJECTIVITY, P110; Mulligan K, 1998, MONIST, V81, P161, DOI 10.5840/monist199881114 ; Oddie G., 2005, VALUE REALITY DESIRE; Olson J, 2004, PHILOS QUART, V54, P295, DOI 10.1111/j.0031-8094.2004.00353.x ; PETTIT P, 1998, ROUTLEDGE ENCY PHILO; Rabinowicz W, 2004, ETHICS, V114, P391, DOI 10.1086/381694 ; RABINOWICZ W, 2004, PATTERNS VALUE ESSAY; SCANLON T., 1998, WHAT WE OWE EACH OTH; Schick F., 2003, AMBIGUITY LOGIC; SVENSSON D, 2004, ETHICS, V114, P261; Wiggins D., 1987, NEEDS VALUES TRUTH, P185; Zimmerman M, 2001, NATURE INTRINSIC VAL","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzn151",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","442IU","WOS:000265835700001",,,,,"2018-01-02",298.0,"broadcd chisholmrm chisholmrm chisholmroderickm crispr darmsj danielssons davisw ewingac ewingac ewingac fehigec feldmanf gibbarda gibbarda goldiepeter goldmana gordonrm greenspanpatricia hondericht hurkat hurkat lemosn mcdowellj mulligank oddieg olsonj pettitp rabinowiczw rabinowiczw scanlont schickf svenssond wigginsd zimmermanm brentanofranzclemens","cluster_6"
-0.5827756653617334,-0.28897958796016554,28.0,17.0,17.0,0.0,0.0,2008.0,117.0,465.0,27.0,58.0,32.0,"J","Holton, R",,,,"Holton, Richard",,,"Partial belief, partial intention","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"Is a belief that one will succeed necessary for an intention? It is argued that the question has traditionally been badly posed, framed as it is in terms of all-out belief We need instead to ask about the relation between intention and partial belief An account of partial belief that is more psychologically realistic than the standard credence account is developed. A notion of partial intention is then developed, standing to all-out intention much as partial belief stands to all-out belief. Various coherence constraints on the notion are explored. It is concluded that the primary relations between intention and belief should be understood as normative and not essential.","MIT, Dept Linguist & Philosophy, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA","Holton, R (reprint author), MIT, Dept Linguist & Philosophy, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.","holton@mit.edu","Holton, Richard/L-9305-2013","Holton, Richard/0000-0002-8116-2639",,,"Anscombe G. E. M., 1963, INTENTION; BRATMAN M, 1992, MIND, P1; BRATMAN M, IN PRESS SPHERES REA; Bratman M, 1987, INTENTION PLANS PRAC; BRUCE V, 1996, UNSOLVED MYSTERIES M; BUSMEYER JD, 1995, DECISION MAKING COGN; CHARNIAK E, 1991, AI MAG, V12, P50; Chater N, 2006, TRENDS COGN SCI, V10, P287, DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.007; Christensen D, 1996, J PHILOS, V93, P450, DOI 10.2307/2940893 ; FRANKISH K, IN PRESS DEGREES BEL; Grice Paul, 1971, P BRIT ACAD, V57, P263; HAMPSHIRE S, 1958, MIND, V67, P1; HAMPSHIRE S, 1988, CHANGE VIEW; HARMAN G, 1976, REV METAPHYS, V29, P431; Holton R, 2004, PHILOS REV, V113, P507, DOI 10.1215/00318108-113-4-507 ; KALMEMAN D, 1973, PHILOS REV, V180, P237; KALMEMAN D, 2000, CHOICES VALUES FRAME; Kaplan Mark, 1996, DECISION THEORY PHIL; LEIST A, 2007, ACTION CONTEXT; Lewis D, 1996, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V74, P549, DOI 10.1080/00048409612347521 ; Luria A. R., 1966, HIGHER CORTICAL FUNC; OWENS D, IN PRESS MENTAL ACTI; Setiya K, 2007, ETHICS, V117, P649, DOI 10.1086/518954 ; STAINAKER R, 1984, INQUIRY; VATLACHER R, 1987, PSYCHOL REV, V94, P3; Velleman D., 1985, PHILOS REV, V94, P33; Weatherson Brian, 2005, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V19, P417; WILLIAMSON T, 2000, KNOWLEDGE LIMITS","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzn002",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","269UC","WOS:000253674800002",,,,,"2018-01-02",299.0,"bratmanm bratmanm bratmanm brucev busmeyerjd charniake chatern christensend frankishk gricepaul hampshires hampshires harmang holtonr kalmemand kalmemand kaplanmark leista lewisd luriaar owensd setiyak stainakerr vatlacherr vellemand weathersonbrian williamsont anscombegem","cluster_3"
-0.3809159186253213,-0.3565381739217783,23.0,17.0,18.0,0.0,1.0,2006.0,115.0,458.0,227.0,259.0,33.0,"J","Gomez-Torrente, M",,,,"Gomez-Torrente, M",,,"Rigidity and essentiality","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"GENERAL TERMS; KIND TERMS; DESIGNATORS","Is there a theoretically interesting notion that is a natural extension of the concept of rigidity to general terms? Such a notion ought to satisfy two Kripkean conditions. First, it must apply to typical general terms for natural kinds, stuffs, and phenomena, and fail to apply to most other general terms. Second, true 'identification sentences' (such as 'Cats are animals') containing general terms that the notion applies to must be necessary. I explore a natural extension of the notion of rigidity to general terms, the notion of an essentialist predicate. I argue that, under natural assumptions, this notion satisfies the two Kripkean conditions.","Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Invest Filosof, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico","Gomez-Torrente, M (reprint author), Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Invest Filosof, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico.","mariogt@servidor.unam.mx",,,,,"Almog J., 1989, THEMES KAPLAN; BERGER A, IN PRESS S KRIPKE; DAVIDSON D, 1972, SEMANTICS NATURAL LA; Devitt M, 2005, PHILOS STUD, V125, P139, DOI 10.1007/s11098-005-8221-y ; Devitt Michael, 1999, LANGUAGE REALITY INT; Donnellan Keith, 1983, KNOWLEDGE MIND, P84; Donnellan K. S., 1973, J PHILOS, VLXX, P711; GINET C, 1983, KNOWLEDGE MIND; GOMEZTORRENTE M, IN PRESS KRIPKE COLO; Hintikka Jaakko, 1973, APPROACHES NATURAL L; Kripke S, 1972, NAMING NECESSITY; Lambert J. K., 1991, PHILOS APPL FREE LOG; Laporte J, 2000, PHILOS STUD, V97, P293, DOI 10.1023/A:1018360026223 ; LINSKY B, 1984, PAC PHILOS QUART, V65, P259; MACBETH D, 1995, PHILOS STUD, V79, P259, DOI 10.1007/BF00989694 ; Marti Genoveva, 2004, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V104, P129; MAY R, 2003, COMMENTS N SALMON AR; Salmon N, 2005, LINGUIST PHILOS, V28, P117, DOI 10.1007/s10988-004-2430-2 ; Salmon N, 2003, MIND, V112, P475, DOI 10.1093/mind/112.447.475 ; SALMON Nathan, 1982, REFERENCE ESSENCE; Salmon N., 1987, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V1, P49; Schwartz SP, 2002, PHILOS STUD, V109, P265, DOI 10.1023/A:1019612524792 ; Soames Scott, 2002, RIGIDITY","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzl227",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","051VH","WOS:000238189300002",,,,,"2018-01-02",300.0,"bergera davidsond devittm devittmichael donnellankeith donnellanks ginetc gomeztorrentem hintikkajaakko kripkes lambertjk laportej linskyb macbethd martigenoveva mayr salmonn salmonn salmonnathan salmonn schwartzsp soamesscott almogj","cluster_0"
-0.4150146499223084,-0.37454570027955947,35.0,17.0,17.0,0.0,0.0,2006.0,115.0,457.0,41.0,73.0,33.0,"J","Huggett, N",,,,"Huggett, N",,,"The regularity account of relational spacetime","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"HUMEAN SUPERVENIENCE; NEWTONS SCHOLIUM; MOTION; PLACE; TIME","A version of relationism that takes spatiotemporal structures-spatial geometry and a standard of inertia-to supervene on the history of relations between bodies is described and defended. The account is used to explain how the relationist should construe models of Newtonian mechanics in which absolute acceleration manifestly does not supervene on the relations; Ptolemaic and Copernican models for example. The account introduces a new way in which a Lewis-style 'best system' might capture regularities in a broadly Humean world; a defence is given against a charge of indeterminism that applies to any such approach to laws.","Univ Illinois, Dept Philosophy, Chicago, IL 60607 USA","Huggett, N (reprint author), Univ Illinois, Dept Philosophy, MC 267, Chicago, IL 60607 USA.","huggett@uic.edu",,,,,"BARBOUR JB, 1982, PROC R SOC LON SER-A, V382, P295, DOI 10.1098/rspa.1982.0102 ; Barbour J B, 1999, END TIME NEXT REVOLU; BARBOUR JB, 1977, NUOVO CIMENTO B, V26, P16; Belot G, 2000, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V51, P561, DOI 10.1093/bjps/51.4.561 ; Belot G., 1999, INT STUDIES PHILOS S, V13, P35; Brighouse C., 1999, INT STUDIES PHILOS S, V13, P53; Callender C, 2001, MIND, V110, P25, DOI 10.1093/mind/110.437.25 ; Descartes R., 1983, PRINCIPLES PHILOS; DiSalle R., 2002, CAMBRIDGE COMPANION, P33; Earman John, 1984, DM ARMSTRONG, P191; Earman J, 1986, PRIMER DETERMINISM; Bangs Earman J., 1995, BANGS CRUNCHES WHIMP; Earman J., 1989, WORLD ENOUGH SPACETI; Friedman M., 1983, FDN SPACETIME THEORI; GARBER Daniel, 1992, DESCARTES METAPHYSIC; HARTLE JB, 1970, PHYS REV D, V2, P1759, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.2.1759 ; HOWARD D, 1985, STUD HIST PHILOS SCI, V16, P171, DOI 10.1016/0039-3681(85)90001-9; Leibniz G. W., 1989, PHILOS ESSAYS; LEWIS D, 1983, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V61, P343, DOI 10.1080/00048408312341131 ; LEWIS D, 1994, MIND, V103, P473, DOI 10.1093/mind/103.412.473 ; Lewis D., 1973, COUNTERFACTUALS; Mach E., 1893, SCI MECH; MAUDLIN T, 1993, PHILOS SCI, V60, P183, DOI 10.1086/289728; MUNDY B, 1986, SYNTHESE, V67, P383, DOI 10.1007/BF00485941 ; Nerlich G, 1976, SHAPE SPACE; NEWTON I, 1962, UNPUB SCI PAPERS I N; Newton Isaac, 1999, PRINCIPIA MATH PRINC; Roberts JT, 2003, PHILOS SCI, V70, P553, DOI 10.1086/376785; Russell B., 1919, INTRO MATH PHILOS; RYNASIEWICZ R, 1995, STUD HIST PHILOS SCI, V26, P295, DOI 10.1016/0039-3681(94)00049-F ; RYNASIEWICZ R, 1995, STUD HIST PHILOS SCI, V26, P133, DOI 10.1016/0039-3681(94)00035-8 ; Sklar L., 1974, SPACE TIME SPACETIME; Stein Howard, 1967, TEXAS Q, V10, P174; Stein H., 1977, MINNESOTA STUDIES PH, V8, P3; van Fraassen B., 1970, INTRO PHILOS TIME SP","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzl041",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","027RT","WOS:000236433800003",,,,,"2018-01-02",301.0,"barbourjb barbourjb belotg belotg brighousec callenderc descartesr disaller earmanjohn earmanj bangsearmanj earmanj friedmanm garberdaniel hartlejb howardd leibnizgw lewisd lewisd lewisd mache maudlint mundyb nerlichg newtoni newtonisaac robertsjt russellb rynasiewiczr rynasiewiczr sklarl steinhoward steinh vanfraassenb barbourjb","cluster_3"
-0.18425719194077722,-0.16189664305297566,25.0,17.0,17.0,0.0,0.0,2005.0,114.0,454.0,277.0,320.0,44.0,"J","Hawthorne, J",,,,"Hawthorne, J",,,"Degree-of-belief and degree-of-support: Why Bayesians need both notions","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"CONDITIONALIZATION; INFERENCE","I argue that Bayesians need two distinct notions of probability. We need the usual degree-of-belief notion that is central to the Bayesian account of rational decision. But Bayesians also need a separate notion of probability that represents the degree to which evidence supports hypotheses. Although degree-of-belief is well suited to the theory of rational decision, Bayesians have tried to apply it to the realm of hypothesis confirmation as well. This double duty leads to the problem of old evidence, a problem that, we will see, is much more extensive than usually recognized. I will argue that degree-of-support is distinct from degree-of-belief, that it is not just a kind of counterfactual degree-of-belief, and that it supplements degree-of-belief in a way that resolves the problems of old evidence and provides a richer account of the logic of scientific inference and belief.","Univ Oklahoma, Dept Philosophy, Norman, OK 73019 USA","Hawthorne, J (reprint author), Univ Oklahoma, Dept Philosophy, 605 Dale Hall Tower,455 W Lindsey St, Norman, OK 73019 USA.","hawthorne@ou.edu",,,,,"Carnap R., 1971, STUDIES INDUCTIVE LO, VI; Earman J., 1992, BAYES BUST; EDWARDS W, 1963, PSYCHOL REV, V70, P193, DOI 10.1037/h0044139 ; EELLS E, 1985, PAC PHILOS QUART, V66, P283; FIELD HH, 1977, J PHILOS, V74, P379; FITELSON B, 1999, PHILOS SCI, P362; Glymour C., 1980, THEORY EVIDENCE; Hajek A, 2003, SYNTHESE, V137, P273, DOI 10.1023/B:SYNT.0000004904.91112.16 ; HARPER WL, 1981, BOGDAN 1981, P97; Hawthorne J, 2004, J PHILOS LOGIC, V33, P89, DOI 10.1023/B:LOGI.0000019237.02534.71 ; Hawthorne J., 2004, STANFORD ENCY PHILOS; Hawthorne J., 1993, PHILOS TOPICS, V21, P99, DOI DOI 10.5840/PHILTOPICS19932117; Howson C., 1993, SCI REASONING BAYESI; JEFFREY R, 1970, SWAIN 1970, P157; Jeffrey Richard., 1965, LOGIC DECISION; JEFFREY R.C., 1992, PROBABILITY ART JUDG; KYBURG HE, 1977, J PHILOS, V74, P501, DOI 10.2307/2025794 ; Lange M, 1999, J PHILOS, V96, P294, DOI 10.2307/2564680 ; LEVI I, 1978, J PHILOS, V75, P730, DOI 10.2307/2025516 ; LEVI I, 1977, J PHILOS, V74, P5, DOI 10.2307/2025732 ; Levi I., 1980, ENTERPRISE KNOWLEDGE; Popper K., 1959, LOGIC SCI DISCOVERY; Skyrms Brian, 1986, CHOICE CHANCE; SKYRMS B, 1988, CAUSATION CHANCE CRE, V1; Swain M., 1970, INDUCTION ACCEPTANCE","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzi277",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","923RH","WOS:000228926500004",,,,,"2018-01-02",302.0,"earmanj edwardsw eellse fieldhh fitelsonb glymourc hajeka harperwl hawthornej hawthornej hawthornej howsonc jeffreyr jeffreyrichard jeffreyrc kyburghe langem levii levii levii popperk skyrmsbrian skyrmsb swainm carnapr","cluster_3"
-0.08880057950738532,-0.09651790497426412,9.0,17.0,17.0,0.0,0.0,1997.0,106.0,421.0,121.0,141.0,21.0,"J","Oppy, G",,,,"Oppy, G",,,"The philosophical insignificance of Godel's Slingshot","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"Oppy, G (reprint author), MONASH UNIV,PHILOSOPHY DEPT,CLAYTON,VIC 3168,AUSTRALIA.",,,"Oppy, Graham/0000-0003-0453-2250",,,"Godel K., 1944, PHILOS B RUSSELL, P125; NEALE S, 1995, MIND, V104, P761, DOI 10.1093/mind/104.416.761 ; OPPY G, 1994, PHILOSOPHIA, V24, P157, DOI 10.1007/BF02379951 ; OPPY G, 1992, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V70, P445, DOI 10.1080/00048409212345321 ; OPPY G, 1992, PHILOS STUD, V67, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF00355226 ; QUINE WVO, WORD OBJECT; SALMON N, 1987, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, P49; Schilpp Paul Arthur, 1944, PHILOS B RUSSELL; TOMBERLIN J, 1987, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/106.421.121",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","WE409","WOS:A1997WE40900010",,,,,"2018-01-02",303.0,"neales oppyg oppyg oppyg quinewvo salmonn schilpppaularthur tomberlinj godelk","cluster_0"
-0.05717560601739039,0.5209870222016091,18.0,17.0,17.0,0.0,1.0,1995.0,104.0,415.0,449.0,471.0,23.0,"J","AUDI, R",,,,"AUDI, R",,,"ACTING FROM VIRTUE","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"AUDI, R (reprint author), UNIV NEBRASKA,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,LINCOLN,NE 68588, USA.",,,,,,"Aristotle, NICOMACHEAN ETHICS; AUDI R, 1986, PHILOS REV, V95, P511, DOI 10.2307/2185049 ; Audi R., 1989, PRACTICAL REASONING; BAIER K, 1959, MORAL POINT VIEW RAT; BROADIE S., 1991, ETHICS ARISTOTLE; Cooper John, 1975, REASON HUMAN GOOD AR; Frankena W., 1973, ETHICS; GARCIA JLA, 1989, MIND, V98, P277; Gert B., 1988, MORALITY; Hume David, 1739, TREATISE HUMAN NATUR; KANT I, INTRO DOCTRINE VIRTU; KANT I, F METAPHYSICS MORALS; KRAUT R, 1979, PHILOS REV, V88, P169; MacIntyre A., 1981, AFTER VIRTUE; Meyer Susan, 1993, ARISTOTLE MORAL RESP; Prior William J., 1991, VIRTUE KNOWLEDGE; ROSS WD, 1939, RIGHT GOOD; Williams B, 1985, ETHICS LIMITS PHILOS","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/104.415.449",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","RJ564","WOS:A1995RJ56400001",,,,,"2018-01-02",304.0,"audir audir baierk broadies cooperjohn frankenaw garciajla gertb humedavid kanti kanti krautr macintyrea meyersusan priorwilliamj rosswd williamsb aristotle","cluster_6"
-0.2390120910118876,-0.29980169219612324,12.0,17.0,17.0,0.0,0.0,1991.0,100.0,398.0,201.0,220.0,20.0,"J","FODOR, JA",,,,"FODOR, JA",,,"THE DOGMA THAT DIDNT BARK (A FRAGMENT OF A NATURALIZED EPISTEMOLOGY)","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"FODOR, JA (reprint author), CUNY,GRAD CTR,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,33 W 42ND ST,NEW YORK,NY 10036, USA.",,,,,,"BOGEN J, 1988, PHILOS REV, V97, P303, DOI 10.2307/2185445 ; Feyerabend P., 1981, REALISM RATIONALISM, VI; FODOR J, 1984, PHILOS SCI, V51, P23, DOI 10.1086/289162; Fodor J., 1990, THEORY CONTENT OTHER; Fodor J. A., 1975, LANGUAGE THOUGHT; Hanson N, 1958, PATTERNS DISCOVERY; Putnam H., 1975, PHILOS PAPERS, V2; Putnam H., 1988, REPRESENTATION REALI; QUINE WV, 1969, WORDS OBJECTIONS; Quine Willard V. O., 1953, LOGICAL POINT VIEW; SWINNEY DA, 1979, J VERB LEARN VERB BE, V18, P523, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90284-6 ; WEINBERG S, 1977, 1 3 MINUTES","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","FK600","WOS:A1991FK60000002",,,,,"2018-01-02",305.0,"feyerabendp fodorj fodorj fodorja hansonn putnamh putnamh quinewv quinewillardvo swinneyda weinbergs bogenj","cluster_0"
-0.4634692066495539,-0.2809512638175418,28.0,17.0,17.0,0.0,1.0,1984.0,93.0,370.0,161.0,176.0,16.0,"J","BUTTERFIELD, J",,,,"BUTTERFIELD, J",,,"SEEING THE PRESENT","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"BUTTERFIELD, J (reprint author), UNIV CAMBRIDGE JESUS COLL,CAMBRIDGE,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"Austin J. L., 1962, SENSE SENSIBILIA; BOAS F, 1911, HDB AM INDIAN LANGUA, V1; BUTTERFIELD J, 1984, UNPUB SPATIAL TEMPOR; BUTTERFIELD J, 1984, UNPUB PHILOS Q; Chao Y. R., 1948, MANDARIN PRIMER; DUMMETT M, 1960, PHILOS REV, V69, P497, DOI 10.2307/2183483 ; Dummett Michael, 1973, FREGE PHILOS LANGUAG; Dummett M., 1968, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V69, P239; FLOWERS JH, 1975, PERCEPT PSYCHOPHYS, V18, P37, DOI 10.3758/BF03199364 ; GALE RM, 1964, MIND, V73, P97; GALE RM, 1968, LANGUAGE TIME; GARSON J, 1971, BASIC ISSUES PHILOS, P145; GARSON JW, 1969, MONIST, V53, P469, DOI 10.5840/monist196953325 ; LLOYD G, 1978, PHILOSOPHY, V53, P215, DOI 10.1017/S0031819100016569 ; Mellor D.H., 1981, REAL TIME; Olli John, 1958, FUNDAMENTALS FINNISH; POSNER MI, 1967, PSYCHOL REV, V74, P392, DOI 10.1037/h0024913 ; POTTER MC, 1975, NATURE, V253, P437, DOI 10.1038/253437a0; PRIOR AN, 1959, PHILOSOPHY, V34, P12, DOI 10.1017/S0031819100029685 ; PRIOR AN, 1970, STUDY TIME; PUTNAM H, 1967, J PHILOS, V64, P240, DOI 10.2307/2024493 ; Quine Willard Van Orman, 1960, WORD OBJECT; QUINE WV, 1976, WAYS PARADOX; SHAFFER WO, 1979, J VERB LEARN VERB BE, V18, P413, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90228-7 ; Taylor Richard, 1955, J PHILOS, V52, P599; WILLIAMS B, 1981, MORAL LUCK PHILOS PA, P164; Wilson Neil L., 1955, J PHILOS, V52, P589; ZEMACH EM, 1972, MIND, V81, P251","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","SM398","WOS:A1984SM39800001",,,,,"2018-01-02",306.0,"boasf butterfieldj butterfieldj chaoyr dummettm dummettmichael dummettm flowersjh galerm galerm garsonj garsonjw lloydg mellordh ollijohn posnermi pottermc prioran prioran putnamh quinewillardvanorman quinewv shafferwo taylorrichard williamsb wilsonneill zemachem austinjl","cluster_0"
-0.18277838051857315,-0.12647891443971002,7.0,17.0,17.0,0.0,1.0,1983.0,92.0,365.0,61.0,79.0,19.0,"J","BISHOP, J",,,,"BISHOP, J",,,"AGENT-CAUSATION","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"BISHOP, J (reprint author), UNIV AUCKLAND,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,AUCKLAND,NEW ZEALAND.",,,"Bishop, John/0000-0002-0280-5457",,,"BISHOP J, 1981, ANALYSIS, V41, P92; BISHOP J, 1980, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V58, P222, DOI 10.1080/00048408012341241 ; Chisholm Roderick, 1966, FREEDOM DETERMINISM; Davidson D, 1980, ESSAYS ACTIONS EVENT, P79; Goldman A., 1970, THEORY HUMAN ACTION; MCCULLAGH CB, 1975, PHILOS STUDIES, V27, P201; PEACOCKE CAB, 1979, HOLISTIC EXPLANATION","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","QA876","WOS:A1983QA87600004",,,,,"2018-01-02",307.0,"bishopj chisholmroderick davidsond goldmana mccullaghcb peacockecab bishopj","cluster_0"
0.025903956094446616,0.03696022811878857,1.0,17.0,17.0,0.0,0.0,1980.0,89.0,353.0,67.0,86.0,20.0,"J","DAVIES, S",,,,"DAVIES, S",,,"EXPRESSION OF EMOTION IN MUSIC","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,,,,"Davies, Stephen/0000-0002-2862-2050",,,"SCRUTON R, 1976, PHILOSOPHY, V51, P273, DOI 10.1017/S0031819100019331","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","JD044","WOS:A1980JD04400005",,,,,"2018-01-02",308.0,"scrutonr","cluster_4"
-0.4467170609183747,-0.35888773952657554,14.0,17.0,17.0,0.0,0.0,1979.0,88.0,350.0,197.0,214.0,18.0,"J","QUINTON, A",,,,"QUINTON, A",,,"OBJECTS AND EVENTS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"QUINTON, A (reprint author), TRINITY COLL,OXFORD,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"CAMPBELL K, 1976, METAPHYSICS INTRO, pCH13; DAVIDSON D, 1969, ESSAYS HONOUR CG HEM; KOTARBINSKI T, 1966, GNOSIOLOGY, P51; MACKIE JL, 1974, CEMENT UNIVERSE, pCH10; QUINE WV, 1976, WAYS PARADOX OTHER E, P100; QUINE WV, 1976, WAYS PARADOX OTHER E, P260; Quine W. V. O., 1960, WORD OBJECT, P171; REICHENBACH H, 1947, ELEMENTS SYMBOLIC LO, P266; RUSSELL B, 1927, ANALYSIS MATTER, pCH23; RUSSELL B, 1956, LOGIC KNOWLEDGE, P273; STOUT GF, 1923, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V3, P95; STRAWSON PF, 1959, INDIVIDUALS, P46; Vendler Z., 1967, LINGUISTICS PHILOSOP; WILLIAMS DC, 1966, PRINCIPLES EMPIRICAL, pCH7","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","GT681","WOS:A1979GT68100003",,,,,"2018-01-02",309.0,"davidsond kotarbinskit mackiejl quinewv quinewv quinewvo reichenbachh russellb russellb stoutgf strawsonpf vendlerz williamsdc campbellk","cluster_0"
-0.076598281478957,-0.004796244991936714,19.0,17.0,18.0,0.0,0.0,1969.0,78.0,309.0,1.0,24.0,24.0,"J","ROSS, A",,,,"ROSS, A",,,"SELF-REFERENCE AND A PUZZLE IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"UNIV COPENHAGEN,COPENHAGEN,DENMARK",,,,,,,"ANDERSEN P, 1960, JURISTEN, P507; CARNAP R, 1954, EINFUHRUNG SYMBOLISC, P76; CHRISTENSEN NE, 1960, JURISTEN, P231; Grue-Sorensen Karl, 1950, STUDIER REFLEKSIVITE; HART HLA, 1964, FESTSKRIFT K OLIVECR, P307; Jorgensen Jorgen, 1953, MIND, V62, P289; JORGENSEN J, 1953, MIND, V62, P290; KRARUP O, 1967, UGESKRIFT RETSVOESEN, P10; OPSAHL T, 1962, TIDSSKRIFT RETTSVITE, P314; Popper K. R., 1954, MIND, V63, P162; ROSS A, 1968, DIRECTIVES NORMS, P3; ROSS A, 1929, THEORIE RECHTSQUELLE, pCH14; ROSS A, 1958, LAW JUSTICE, P16; ROSS A, 1959, DANSK STATSFORFATNIN, P46; ROSS A, 1959, DANSK STATSFORFATNIN, P41; RUSSELL B, 1960, PRINCIPIA MATHEMATIC, V1, P37; SEGELBERG I, 1943, THEORIA, P157; SORENSEN M, 1959, JURISTEN, P446; TAMMELO I, 1958, ARCH RECHTS SOZIALPH, P495","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","Y5176","WOS:A1969Y517600001",,,,,"2018-01-02",310.0,"carnapr christensenne gruesorensenkarl harthla jorgensenjorgen jorgensenj krarupo opsahlt popperkr rossa rossa rossa rossa rossa russellb segelbergi sorensenm tammeloi andersenp","cluster_4"
0.024983957559623945,0.04165225580718913,5.0,17.0,17.0,0.0,0.0,1967.0,76.0,301.0,1.0,20.0,20.0,"J","LORENZ, K; MITTELSTRASS, J",,,,"LORENZ, K; MITTELSTRASS, J",,,"RATIONAL PHILOSOPHY OF LANGUAGE - PROGRAMME IN PLATOS CRATYLUS RECONSIDERED","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"UNIV ERLANGEN NURNBERG,PHILOSOPH SEMINAR,ERLANGEN,BUNDES REPUBLIK",,,,,,,"LORENZ K, 1966, ARCH GESCHICHTE PHIL, V48; Lorenzen P., 1965, RATIO, V7, P35; Lorenzen P., 1962, RATIO, V4, P85; Flew A., 1953, LOGIC LANGUAGE, V2, P112; Robinson R., 1956, PHILOS REV, V65, P328","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","ZA894","WOS:A1967ZA89400001",,,,,"2018-01-02",311.0,"lorenzenp lorenzenp flewa robinsonr lorenzk","cluster_4"
0.024023723563969937,0.03570397152566436,4.0,17.0,17.0,0.0,0.0,1964.0,73.0,290.0,215.0,233.0,19.0,"J","MCCLOSKEY, MA",,,,"MCCLOSKEY, MA",,,"METAPHORS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"ADLER MJ, 1927, DIALECTIC, P94; HERBERT G, COLLAR; LOCKE, ESSAY CONCERNING HUM, pCH10; MORRIS CW, 1946, LANGUAGE SIGNS BEHAV, P136","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","CCP56","WOS:A1964CCP5600006",,,,,"2018-01-02",313.0,"herbertg locke morriscw adlermj","cluster_4"
-0.518761366598272,-0.3273211193833381,30.0,16.0,16.0,0.0,3.0,2012.0,121.0,484.0,919.0,950.0,32.0,"J","Lowe, EJ",,,,"Lowe, E. J.",,,"What is the Source of Our Knowledge of Modal Truths?","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"COINCIDENCE","There is currently intense interest in the question of the source of our presumed knowledge of truths concerning what is, or is not, metaphysically possible or necessary. Some philosophers locate this source in our capacities to conceive or imagine various actual or non-actual states of affairs, but this approach is open to certain familiar and seemingly powerful objections. A different and ostensibly more promising approach has been developed by Timothy Williamson, according to which our capacity for modal knowledge is just an extension, or by-product, of our general capacity to acquire knowledge of true counterfactual conditionals-a capacity that we deploy ubiquitously in everyday life. Williamson's account crucially involves a thesis to the effect that modal truths can be explained in terms of counterfactual truths. In this paper, I query Williamson's account on a number of points, including this thesis. My positive proposal, which owes a debt to the work of Kit Fine on modality and essence, appeals instead to our capacity to grasp essences, understood in a neo-Aristotelian fashion, according to which essences are expressed by 'real definitions'.","Univ Durham, Durham DH1 3HP, England","Lowe, EJ (reprint author), Univ Durham, Durham DH1 3HP, England.","E.J.Lowe@durham.ac.uk",,,,,"Baker C. C. T., 1961, DICT MATH; Correia Fabrice, 2006, DIALECTICA, V61, P63; Descartes R., 1984, PHILOS WRITINGS DESC, VII; Fodor J. A., 1998, CONCEPTS COGNITIVE S; GALILEI Galileu, 1954, DIALOGUES 2 NEW SCI; Gendler T.S., 2002, CONCEIVABILITY POSSI; Jenkins CS, 2008, PHILOS QUART, V58, P693, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2008.579.x; Kanzian Christian, 2008, PERSISTENCE; KRIPKE S., 1980, NAMING NECESSITY; Le Poidevin R., 2008, BEING DEV CONT METAP; Locke John, 1975, ESSAY HUMAN UNDERSTA; LOWE EJ, 1995, PHILOS QUART, V45, P41, DOI 10.2307/2219847 ; Lowe EJ, 2003, RATIO, V16, P140, DOI 10.1111/1467-9329.00212 ; Lowe E. J., 2011, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V85, P1; LOWE EJ, 1998, POSSIBILITY METAPHYS; LOWE EJ, 2007, ANALYSIS, V67, P286; Lowe E. J., 2006, 4 CATEGORY ONTOLOGY; Merricks T., 2001, OBJECTS PERSONS; Olson ET, 2001, PHILOS QUART, V51, P337, DOI 10.1111/1467-9213.00233 ; Parfit D., 1984, REASONS PERSONS; Putnam H., 1990, REALISM HUMAN FACE; Roca-Royes S, 2011, NOUS, V45, P22, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00757.x; Shoemaker S, 1998, PAC PHILOS QUART, V79, P59, DOI 10.1111/1468-0114.00050 ; deSpinoza Benedictus, 1955, IMPROVEMENT UNDERSTA; Suits B., 1978, GRASSHOPPER GAMES LI; Tomberlin James, 1994, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES; Vaidya AJ, 2010, PHILOSOPHIA, V38, P811, DOI 10.1007/s11406-010-9243-z; van Inwagen P., 1990, MAT BEINGS; WILLIAMSON T, 2007, PHILOS PHILOS; Zalta E. N., 2007, MIND, V115, P659","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423","1460-2113",,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzs122",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","147QM","WOS:000319182100003",,,,,"2018-01-02",315.0,"correiafabrice descartesr fodorja galileigalileu gendlerts jenkinscs kanzianchristian kripkes lepoidevinr lockejohn loweej loweej loweej loweej loweej loweej merrickst olsonet parfitd putnamh rocaroyess shoemakers despinozabenedictus suitsb tomberlinjames vaidyaaj vaninwagenp williamsont zaltaen bakercct","cluster_0"
-1.1677368354733795,-1.045884645419955,44.0,16.0,16.0,0.0,1.0,2010.0,119.0,473.0,103.0,141.0,39.0,"J","Williams, JRG",,,,"Williams, J. R. G.",,,"Fundamental and Derivative Truths","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"This article investigates the claim that some truths are fundamentally or really true and that other truths are not. Such a distinction can help us reconcile radically minimal metaphysical views with the verities of common sense. I develop an understanding of the distinction whereby Fundamentality is not itself a metaphysical distinction, but rather a device that must be presupposed to express metaphysical distinctions. Drawing on recent work by Rayo on anti-Quinean theories of ontological commitments, I formulate a rigourous theory of the notion. In the final sections, I show how this package dovetails with 'interpretationist' theories of meaning to give sober content to thought that some things-perhaps sets, or gerrymandered mereological sums-can be 'postulated into existence'.","Univ Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England","Williams, JRG (reprint author), Univ Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England.","j.r.g.williams@leeds.ac.uk",,,,,"Armstrong D. M., 1989, UNIVERSALS OPINIONAT; Azzouni J., 2004, DEFLATING EXISTENTIA; Beebee H, 2005, TRUTHMAKERS CONT DEB; Benacerraf P., 1964, PHILOS MATH SELECTED; Cameron RP, 2008, PHILOS STUD, V140, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11098-008-9223-3; Chalmers David J., 2009, METAMETAPHYSICS; DALES HG, 1998, TRUTH MATH; Davidson D., 1980, INQUIRIES TRUTH INTE; Davidson Donald, 1974, SYNTHESE, V27, P309, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00484597; Dorr C., 2002, THESIS PRINCETON U; Everett A., 2000, EMPTY NAMES FICTION; Ekman Paul, 2001, PHILOS IMPRINT, V1, P1; FINE K, 2005, TENSE MODALITY; Fine K., 2006, ABSOLUTE GEN; Gale R., 2002, BLACKWELL GUIDE META; Gendler T.S., 2002, CONCEIVABILITY POSSI; Gunderson Keith, 1975, LANGUAGE MIND KNOWLE; Hawthorne J, 2002, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V65, P247, DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2002.tb00201.x ; Hirsch E., 1993, DIVIDING REALITY; Kelly T., 2005, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V19, P179; Larson R., 1995, KNOWLEDGE MEANING; Le Poidevin R, 2008, BEING CONT DEV MET S, V83; LEWIS D, 1983, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V61, P343, DOI 10.1080/00048408312341131 ; LEWIS D, 1984, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V62, P221, DOI 10.1080/00048408412340013 ; Lewis D., 1983, PHILOS PAPERS, V1; Lewis D, 1974, SYNTHESE, V27, P331, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00484599; McGee V, 1997, PHILOS REV, V106, P35, DOI 10.2307/2998341 ; Merricks T., 2001, OBJECTS PERSONS; PUTNAM H, 1980, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V45, P421; Quine Willard V. O., 1953, LOGICAL POINT VIEW; RAYO A, ACCOUNT POSSIB UNPUB; Rayo A, 2007, PHILOS COMPASS, V2, P428, DOI 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00080.x; Rayo A, 2008, PHILOS REV, V117, P385, DOI 10.1215/00318108-2008-003; Shapiro Stewart, 1991, FDN FDN CASE 2 ORDER; SIDER T, 2007, INL NW PHIL C; Sider T, 2007, PHILOS REV, V116, P51, DOI 10.1215/00318108-2006-022; SOAMES S, 1989, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V3, P575; THOMSON J, 2006, CONTENT MODALITY THE; Uzquiano G, 2004, MONIST, V87, P429, DOI 10.5840/monist200487324 ; van Inwagen P., 1990, MAT BEINGS; Williams JRG, 2007, PHILOS REV, V116, P361, DOI 10.1215/00318108-2007-002; WILLIAMS JRG, 2005, THESIS U STANDREWS; Williamson Timothy, 2003, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V17, P415, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1520-8583.2003.00017.X; WILLIAMSON T, 2001, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V25, P72","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzp137",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","605BP","WOS:000278322600004",,,,,"2018-01-02",316.0,"azzounij beebeeh benacerrafp cameronrp chalmersdavidj daleshg davidsond davidsondonald dorrc everetta ekmanpaul finek finek galer gendlerts gundersonkeith hawthornej hirsche kellyt larsonr lepoidevinr lewisd lewisd lewisd lewisd mcgeev merrickst putnamh quinewillardvo rayoa rayoa rayoa shapirostewart sidert sidert soamess thomsonj uzquianog vaninwagenp williamsjrg williamsjrg williamsontimothy williamsont armstrongdm","cluster_3"
-0.9503539134411931,-0.765008325929573,42.0,16.0,16.0,0.0,0.0,2006.0,115.0,459.0,519.0,565.0,47.0,"J","Barnett, D",,,,"Barnett, David",,,"Zif is if","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"CONDITIONAL PROBABILITIES; INDICATIVE CONDITIONALS; EVEN IF","A conditional takes the form 'If A, then C'. On the truth-conditional view of conditionals, conditional statements state things with truth-conditions. On the suppositional view, conditional statements involve the expression of a supposition. I develop and defend a view on which conditional statements both state things with truth-conditions and express suppositions. On this view, something is fundamentally right about standard truth-conditional and standard suppositional views. Considerations in favor of conditional contents lead us to attribute truth-conditional contents to conditional statements; considerations in favor of the suppositional view then lead us to an unexpected account of these contents. The resulting view has a number of benefits, including a unified treatment of conditional speech acts, a plausible account of our practice of ascribing truth-values to conditional statements, a simple explanation of the apparent equivalence between probabilities of conditionals and conditional probabilities, an intuitive treatment of 'Gibbardian stand-offs, a plausible logic of conditionals, and an explanation of why theorizing about conditionals has proved so difficult.","Univ Colorado, Dept Philosophy, Boulder, CO 80309 USA","Barnett, D (reprint author), Univ Colorado, Dept Philosophy, Campus Box 232,Hellems 167, Boulder, CO 80309 USA.","David.B.Barnett@Colorado.edu",,,,,"Adams E., 1975, LOGIC CONDITIONALS; Adams E. W., 1998, PRIMER PROBABILITY L; ADAMS EW, 1966, PROBABILITY LOGIC CO, P256; Adams E.W., 1965, INQUIRY, V8, P166; BENNETT J., 2003, PHILOS GUIDE CONDITI; Black Max, 1950, PHILOS ANAL; BROWN R, 1969, CONT PHILOS AUSTR; Cole P., 1978, SYNTAX SEMANTICS, V9; DUDMAN VH, 1994, J PHILOS, V91, P113, DOI 10.2307/2940989 ; Dummett Michael, 1978, TRUTH OTHER ENIGMAS; EDGINGTON D, 1995, MIND, V104, P235, DOI 10.1093/mind/104.414.235 ; EDGINGTON D, 1986, CRITICA, P176; EELLS E, 1994, PROBABILITY CONDITIO; ELLIS B, 1969, EPISTEMOLOGICAL CONC, P72; Farley A. M., 1986, PAPERS PARASESSION P; French P., 1977, MIDWEST STUDIES PHIL, V2; GARDENFORS P, 1986, PHILOS REV, V95, P81, DOI 10.2307/2185133 ; Gardenfors P., 1988, KNOWLEDGE FLUX; Grice H. P., 1989, STUDIES WAY WORDS; Harper W, 1981, IFS; HAZEN A, 1979, ANALYSIS, V39, P35, DOI 10.2307/3327303 ; HINTAKKA J, 1966, ASPECTS INDUCTIVE LO; JACKSON F, 1979, PHILOS REV, V88, P565, DOI 10.2307/2184845 ; Jackson F., 1987, CONDITIONALS; Jackson F, 1991, CONDITIONALS; JEFFREY R, 1991, ARIST SOC P, V65, P161; KAHANE H, 1973, ISSUES LINGUISTICS P; LEWIS D, 1976, PHILOS REV, V85, P297, DOI 10.2307/2184045 ; LEWIS D., 1986, PHILOS PAPERS, VII; Lycan William, 2001, REAL CONDITIONALS; LYCAN WG, 1991, LINGUIST PHILOS, V14, P115, DOI 10.1007/BF00627400 ; MACKIES J, 1973, TRUTH PROBABILITY PA; MCDERMOTT M, 1996, PHILOS REV, V105, P1, DOI 10.2307/2185762 ; MCGEE V, 1985, J PHILOS, V82, P462, DOI 10.2307/2026276 ; MCGEE V, 1989, PHILOS REV, V98, P485, DOI 10.2307/2185116 ; Pollock John, 1976, SUBJUNCTIVE REASONIN; Quine W., 1974, METHODS LOGIC; RYLE G, 1950, IF SO BECAUSE; STALNAKE.RC, 1970, PHILOS SCI, V37, P64, DOI 10.1086/288280 ; STALNAKER R, 1975, PHILOSOPHIA, V5, P269, DOI 10.1007/BF02379021 ; Stalnaker R, 1968, STUDIES LOGICAL THEO, V2, P98; Woods M, 1997, CONDITIONALS","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzl519",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","073RX","WOS:000239761400001",,,,,"2018-01-02",317.0,"adamsew adamsew adamsew bennettj blackmax brownr colep dudmanvh dummettmichael edgingtond edgingtond eellse ellisb farleyam frenchp gardenforsp gardenforsp gricehp harperw hazena hintakkaj jacksonf jacksonf jacksonf jeffreyr kahaneh lewisd lewisd lycanwilliam lycanwg mackiesj mcdermottm mcgeev mcgeev pollockjohn quinew ryleg stalnakerc stalnakerr stalnakerr woodsm adamse","cluster_3"
0.0653133519127098,0.08608302723454396,101.0,16.0,16.0,0.0,0.0,2000.0,109.0,435.0,481.0,518.0,38.0,"J","Smith, AD",,,,"Smith, AD",,,"Space and sight","MIND",,,"English","Review",,,,,,,"INFANTS SENSITIVITY; FORM PERCEPTION; INFORMATION; SHAPE; RESPONSES; CONSTANCY; COLLISION; MASKING; STIMULI; VISION","This paper, which has both a historical and a polemical aspect, investigates the view, dominant throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, that the sense of sight is, originally, not phenomenally three-dimensional in character, and that we must come to interpret its properly two-dimensional data by reference to the sense of 'touch'. The principal argument for this claim, due to Berkeley, is examined and found wanting. The supposedly confirming findings concerning 'Molyneux subjects' are also investigated and are shown to be either irrelevant or disconfirming. Recent investigations on infant and neonatal perception are discussed and are also found to be disconfirming. An innatist version of the theory is then considered and is shown to be undermined by the largely 'Gibsonian' character of early space-perception. Finally three recent arguments in favour of the theory - two from psychologists, one from a philosopher - are considered and answered.","Univ Essex, Dept Philosophy, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England","Smith, AD (reprint author), Univ Essex, Dept Philosophy, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England.",,,,,,"Abbott T. K., 1864, SIGHT TOUCH ATTEMPT; ACKROYD C, 1974, Q J EXP PSYCHOL, V26, P114, DOI 10.1080/14640747408400393 ; BAILEY S, 1842, REV BERKELEYS THEOOR; BAILEY S, 1858, LETT PHILOS HUMAN MI; BERKELEY G, 1709, ESSAY TOWARDS NEW TH; BERKELEY G, 1733, THEORY VISION VINDIC; BOWER TGR, 1970, PERCEPT PSYCHOPHYS, V8, P51, DOI 10.3758/BF03208933 ; BOWER TGR, 1970, NATURE, V228, P679, DOI 10.1038/228679a0; BOWER TGR, 1979, SCIENCE, V203, P1137, DOI 10.1126/science.424745; BRAUNSTEIN ML, 1976, DEPTH PERCEPTION THR; CAMPOS JJ, 1970, SCIENCE, V170, P196, DOI 10.1126/science.170.3954.196; Cheselden W., 1728, PHILOS T ROY SOC LON, V35, P447; CHOW KL, 1973, HDB SENSORY PHYSIOLO, P599; Condillac Etienne Bonnot, 1754, TRAITE SENSATIONS, V2; CONDILLAC EBD, ESSAI ORIGINE CONNOI; Crane T., 1992, CONTENTS EXPERIENCE; CRATON LG, 1990, PERCEPT PSYCHOPHYS, V47, P169, DOI 10.3758/BF03205981 ; DESCRATES R, 1637, DIOPTRIQUE; DIDEROT D, 1749, PENSEES PHILOS; DIFRANCO D, 1978, PERCEPTION, V7, P385, DOI 10.1068/p070385; EPSTEIN W, 1978, PERCEPT PSYCHOPHYS, V23, P137, DOI 10.3758/BF03208294; EPSTEIN W, 1982, PERCEPTION, V11, P75, DOI 10.1068/p110075 ; EPSTEIN W, 1973, PERCEPTION, V2, P267, DOI 10.1068/p020267; FANTZ RL, 1961, SCI AM, V204, P66, DOI 10.1038/scientificamerican0561-66 ; FANTZ RL, 1956, PERCEPT MOTOR SKILL, V6, P13, DOI 10.2466/pms.1956.6.g.13 ; FORREST DW, 1974, AM J PSYCHOL, V87, P719, DOI 10.2307/1421980 ; FRANZ JC, 1841, PHILOS T ROY SOC LON, V131, P59; GIBSON EJ, 1960, SCI AM, V202, P64, DOI 10.1038/scientificamerican0460-64 ; Gibson J. J., 1968, SENSES CONSIDERED PE; GILCHRIST AL, 1980, PERCEPT PSYCHOPHYS, V28, P527, DOI 10.3758/BF03198821; GILCHRIST AL, 1979, SCI AM, V240, P112, DOI 10.1038/scientificamerican0379-112 ; GRAFE MA, 1892, REV SCI, V50, P67; Gregory R. L., 1963, EXPT PSYCHOL SOC MON; HAMILTON W, 1882, LECTURES METAPHYSICS; Hatfield G., 1990, NATURAL NORMATIVE; HATFIELD GC, 1979, ISIS, V70, P363, DOI 10.1086/352281 ; HELLER MA, 1983, PERCEPTION, V12, P607, DOI 10.1068/p120607 ; Hochberg J., 1974, PERCEPTION ESSAYS HO, P17; Hofsten C. V., 1982, DEV PSYCHOL, V18, P450; HUME D, TREASTISE HUMAN NATU; James W., 1890, PRINCIPLES PSYCHOL; JEANNEROD M, 1975, ANN PSYCHOL, V75, P169; JOHANSSON G, 1975, SCI AM, V232, P76, DOI 10.1038/scientificamerican0675-76 ; JOHANSSON G, 1973, PERCEPTION, V2, P135, DOI 10.1068/p020135 ; JOHANSSON G, 1977, STABILITY CONSTANCY, P375; JOYNSON RB, 1958, Q J EXP PSYCHOL, V10, P65, DOI 10.1080/17470215808416258 ; KAPLAN GA, 1969, PERCEPT PSYCHOPHYS, V6, P193, DOI 10.3758/BF03207015 ; KELLMAN PJ, 1987, J EXP PSYCHOL HUMAN, V13, P545, DOI 10.1037/0096-1523.13.4.545; Kellman P. J., 1993, VISUAL PERCEPTION CO, P121; KESTENBAUM R, 1987, BRIT J DEV PSYCHOL, V5, P367, DOI 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1987.tb01073.x ; LEDERMAN SJ, 1987, J EXP PSYCHOL LEARN, V13, P606, DOI 10.1037/0278-7393.13.4.606; Leibniz Gottfried Wilhelm, 1765, NOUVEAUX ESSAIS ENTE; LEONARD JA, 1967, NATURE, V215, P1413, DOI 10.1038/2151413a0; LOCKE J, 1708, FAMILIAR LETT SEVERA; LOCKE J, 1706, ESSAY HUMAN UNDERSTA; Locke John, 1706, EXAMINATION P MALEBR; MARCEL AJ, 1983, COGNITIVE PSYCHOL, V15, P197, DOI 10.1016/0010-0285(83)90009-9 ; MELTZOFF AN, 1979, NATURE, V282, P403, DOI 10.1038/282403a0; MELTZOFF AN, 1983, CHILD DEV, V54, P702, DOI 10.2307/1130058; Merleau-Ponty Maurice, 1945, PHENOMENOLOGIE PERCE; MILL JS, 1875, BAILEY ON BERKELEYS; MILL JS, REJOINDER MR BAILEYS; MILL JS, 1865, EXAMINATION SIR W HA; NUNNELEY T, 1858, ORGAN OF VISION; O'Shaughnessy B., 1980, WILL; OWSLEY C, 1983, PERCEPTION, V12, P707, DOI 10.1068/p120707 ; Pastore N., 1971, SELECTIVE HIST THEOR; Peacocke Christopher, 1992, CONTENTS EXPERIENCE, P105; Peacocke Ch., 1983, SENSE AND CONTENT; PLATNER E, 1793, PHILOS APHORISMEN; PORTERFIELD W, 1759, TREATISE ON EYE; RADNER N, 1982, CHILD DEV, V53, P1004; Reid Thomas, 1785, ESSAYS INTELLECTUAL; Riddoch G, 1917, BRAIN, V40, P15, DOI 10.1093/brain/40.1.15 ; ROBERTSON GC, 1888, MIND, V13, P418; ROCK I, 1967, SCI AM, V216, P96, DOI 10.1038/scientificamerican0567-96 ; ROCK I, 1964, ACTA PSYCHOL, V22, P119, DOI 10.1016/0001-6918(64)90011-3 ; Rock I., 1997, INDIRECT PERCEPTION; Rock I., 1983, LOGIC PERCEPTION; Rose S. A., 1987, HDB INFANT DEV, P318; ROTHBLAT LA, 1978, PERCEPTION EXPERIENC; RUNESON S, 1977, SCAND J PSYCHOL, V18, P172, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1977.tb00274.x; Ruskin J., 1857, ELEMENTS DRAWING; SCHWARTZ AN, 1973, J EXP CHILD PSYCHOL, V15, P86, DOI 10.1016/0022-0965(73)90133-1; SENDEN MV, 1960, SPACE SIGHT; SLATER A, 1984, BRIT J DEV PSYCHOL, V2, P287, DOI 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1984.tb00936.x ; SLATER A, 1990, J EXP CHILD PSYCHOL, V49, P314, DOI 10.1016/0022-0965(90)90061-C; SLATER A, 1985, PERCEPTION, V14, P337, DOI 10.1068/p140337 ; SPALDING DA, 1873, MACMILLANS MAGAZINE, V27; TAINE H, 1870, INTELLIGENCE; TURVEY MT, 1973, PSYCHOL REV, V80, P1, DOI 10.1037/h0033872 ; Tye M., 1992, CONTENTS EXPERIENCE, P158; VALVO A, 1971, SIGHT RESTORATION AF; Villey P., 1914, MONDE AVEUGLES; WARREN DH, 1979, PERCEPTION, V8, P323, DOI 10.1068/p080323 ; White Burton Leonard, 1971, HUMAN INFANTS EXPERI; WIESEL TN, 1982, NATURE, V299, P583, DOI 10.1038/299583a0 ; YONAS A, 1979, CAN J PSYCHOL, V33, P268, DOI 10.1037/h0081725; YONAS A, 1977, PERCEPT PSYCHOPHYS, V21, P97, DOI 10.3758/BF03198713; YONAS A, 1987, CHILD DEV, V58, P910, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1987.tb01428.x; YONAS A, 1987, HDB INFANT PERCEPTIO, V2, P79","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423","1460-2113",,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/109.435.481",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","359NB","WOS:000089616000004",,,,,"2018-01-02",318.0,"ackroydc baileys baileys berkeleyg berkeleyg bowertgr bowertgr bowertgr braunsteinml camposjj cheseldenw chowkl condillacetiennebonnot condillacebd cranet cratonlg descratesr diderotd difrancod epsteinw epsteinw epsteinw fantzrl fantzrl forrestdw franzjc gibsonej gibsonjj gilchristal gilchristal grafema gregoryrl hamiltonw hatfieldg hatfieldgc hellerma hochbergj hofstencv humed jamesw jeannerodm johanssong johanssong johanssong joynsonrb kaplanga kellmanpj kellmanpj kestenbaumr ledermansj leibnizgottfriedwilhelm leonardja lockej lockej lockejohn marcelaj meltzoffan meltzoffan merleaupontymaurice milljs milljs milljs nunneleyt oshaughnessyb owsleyc pastoren peacockechristopher peacockech platnere porterfieldw radnern reidthomas riddochg robertsongc rocki rocki rocki rocki rosesa rothblatla runesons ruskinj schwartzan sendenmv slatera slatera slatera spaldingda taineh turveymt tyem valvoa villeyp warrendh whiteburtonleonard wieseltn yonasa yonasa yonasa yonasa abbotttk","cluster_4"
-0.09218363533188514,-0.07437414186995685,11.0,16.0,16.0,0.0,0.0,2000.0,109.0,434.0,285.0,298.0,14.0,"J","Hawthorne, J; Szabo Gendler, T",,,,"Hawthorne, J; Szabo Gendler, T",,,"Origin essentialism: The arguments reconsidered","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"Syracuse Univ, Dept Philosophy, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA","Hawthorne, J (reprint author), Syracuse Univ, Dept Philosophy, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA.",,,,,,"CHISHOLM R, 1967, NOUS, P1; Chisholm Roderick M., 1973, REV METAPHYS, V26, P581; FORBES G, 1986, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V11, P3, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4975.1986.tb00486.x ; Forbes Graeme, 1985, METAPHYSICS MODALITY; Forbes G., 1994, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V8, P415; MCKAY TJ, 1986, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V11, P295, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4975.1986.tb00499.x ; ROBERTSON T, 1998, MIND, V107, P428; SALMON N, 1986, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V11, P75, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4975.1986.tb00489.x ; SALMON N, 1989, PHILOS REV, V98, P3, DOI 10.2307/2185369 ; Salmon Nathan U., 1981, REFERENCE ESSENCE; YABLO S, 1988, J PHILOS, V85, P329, DOI 10.2307/2026723","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/109.434.285",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","305CF","WOS:000086520700007",,,,,"2018-01-02",319.0,"chisholmroderickm forbesg forbesgraeme forbesg mckaytj robertsont salmonn salmonn salmonnathanu yablos chisholmr","cluster_0"
-0.5165957724334025,0.8205524785125705,29.0,16.0,16.0,0.0,0.0,1997.0,106.0,423.0,451.0,473.0,23.0,"J","Heath, J",,,,"Heath, J",,,"Foundationalism and practical reason","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"Heath, J (reprint author), UNIV TORONTO,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,TORONTO,ON M5S 1A1,CANADA.",,,,,,"COHON R, 1986, ETHICS, V96, P545, DOI 10.1086/292774 ; FOOT P, VIRTUES VICES; Frankfurt Harry, IMPORTANCE WHAT WE C; FREEMAN S, 1990, PHILOS PUBLIC AFF, V19, P122; GIBBARD A, WISE CHOICES APT FEE; HABERMAS JURGEN, 1990, MORAL CONSCIOUSNESS, P43; Hume David, ENQUIRY PRINCIPLES M; KORSGAARD C, SOURCES NORMATIVITY; KORSGAARD CM, 1986, J PHILOS, V83, P5, DOI 10.2307/2026464 ; KORSGAARD CM, 1996, ETHICS, P486; MACKIE JL, ETHICS INVENTING RIG; NAGEL T, POSSIBILITY ALTRUISM; PARSONS T, STRUCTURE SOCIAL ACT; RORTY R, PHILOS MIRROR NATURE; SCANLON TM, 1982, UTILITARIANISM BEYON; Sellars W, 1963, SCI PERCEPTION REALI, P127; SEN A, 1982, UTILITARIANISM BEYON; SINNOTTARMSTRON.W, MORAL KNOWLEDGE; SMITH M, 1987, MIND, V96, P36; SMITH M, MORAL PROBLEM; SMITH M, 1987, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, P243; TAYLOR C, PHILOS HUMAN SCI PHI; WALLACE RJ, 1990, MIND, V99, P355; Williams B., MORAL LUCK; WILLIAMS M, UNNATURAL DOUBTS; WILLIAMS M, GROUNDLESS BELIEF; WITTGENSTEIN L, CERTAINTY; WRIGHT C, TRUTH OBJECTIVITY; WRIGHT C, REALISM MEANING TRUT","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/106.423.451",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","XH166","WOS:A1997XH16600004",,,,,"2018-01-02",320.0,"footp frankfurtharry freemans gibbarda habermasjurgen humedavid korsgaardc korsgaardcm korsgaardcm mackiejl nagelt parsonst rortyr scanlontm sellarsw sena sinnottarmstronw smithm smithm smithm taylorc wallacerj williamsb williamsm williamsm wittgensteinl wrightc wrightc cohonr","cluster_6"
-0.7018917463317229,-0.6633230291788379,32.0,16.0,16.0,0.0,0.0,1997.0,106.0,421.0,33.0,52.0,20.0,"J","Hales, SD",,,,"Hales, SD",,,"A consistent relativism","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"COGNITIVE RELATIVISM; PARADOX; TRUTH",,,"Hales, SD (reprint author), BLOOMSBURG UNIV,BAKELESS CTR HUMANITIES,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,BLOOMSBURG,PA 17815, USA.",,,,,,"BEACH E, 1984, METAPHILOSOPHY, V15, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9973.1984.tb00130.x ; BENNINGSON T, 1994, PAC M AM PHIL ASS LO; CHISHOLM RM, METAPHYSICS; CINELLI A, 1993, AUSLEGUNG, V19, P35; Davidson D., 1974, INQUIRIES TRUTH INTE, P183; Gamut L.T.F., 1991, INTENSIONAL LOGIC LO, V2; GEMES K, 1992, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V52, P47, DOI 10.2307/2107743 ; HALES SD, 1994, HIST PHILOS Q, V11, P101; HARRIS JF, AGAINST RELATIVISM; HINMAN LM, 1982, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V43, P179, DOI 10.2307/2107528 ; Hollis Martin, 1982, RATIONALITY RELATIVI; KRAUSZ M, 1982, RELATIVISM COGNITIVE; Krausz Michael, 1989, RELATIVISM INTERPRET; Kuhn T., STRUCTURE SCI REVOLU; LEWIS D, PLURALITY WORLDS; Loux M., 1979, POSSIBLE ACTUAL; MARGOLIS J, TRUTH RELATIVISM; MCGREW T, 1994, ELECT J ANAL PHILOS, V2; MEILAND JW, 1980, METAPHILOSOPHY, V11, P115, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9973.1980.tb00100.x ; Newton-Smith W., 1982, RATIONALITY RELATIVI, P106; Nietzsche Friedrich W., WILL POWER; PERCIVAL P, 1994, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V94, P189; PLANTINGA A, NATURE NECESSITY; PUTNAM H., REASON TRUTH HIST; PUTNAM H, REALISM HUMAN FACE; Putnam H., 1983, REALISM AND REASON, P205; Quine WV, 1976, WAYS PARADOX OTHER E, P185; Rorty R., 1991, OBJECTIVITY RELATIVI, V1, P21; SCHRIFT A, NIETZSCHE QUESTION I; STACK GJ, 1981, PHILOS TODAY, V25, P221, DOI 10.5840/philtoday198125312 ; Swoyer C., 1982, RELATIVISM COGNITIVE, P84; Wong David B, 1989, RELATIVISM INTERPRET, P140","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/106.421.33",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","WE409","WOS:A1997WE40900002",,,,,"2018-01-02",321.0,"benningsont chisholmrm cinellia davidsond gamutltf gemesk halessd harrisjf hinmanlm hollismartin krauszm krauszmichael kuhnt lewisd louxm margolisj mcgrewt meilandjw newtonsmithw nietzschefriedrichw percivalp plantingaa putnamh putnamh putnamh quinewv rortyr schrifta stackgj swoyerc wongdavidb beache","cluster_3"
-0.49558835118465194,-0.4672919871831823,22.0,16.0,16.0,0.0,0.0,1997.0,106.0,421.0,69.0,98.0,30.0,"J","McGrath, M",,,,"McGrath, M",,,"Weak Deflationism + An account of truth","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"TRUTH",,,"McGrath, M (reprint author), BROWN UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,PROVIDENCE,RI 02912, USA.",,,,,,"Cartwright R., 1987, PHILOS ESSAYS, P71; DAVIDSON D, 1996, J PHILOS, V93, P263, DOI 10.2307/2941075 ; DEVITT M, 1991, PAC PHILOS QUART, V72, P87; DUNN M, 1990, TRUTH CONSEQUENCES; ETCHEMENDY J, 1988, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V53, P51, DOI 10.2307/2274427; FIELD H, 1994, PHILOS REV, V103, P405, DOI 10.2307/2185788 ; FIELD H, 1994, MIND, V103, P249, DOI 10.1093/mind/103.411.249 ; FOX JF, 1987, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V65, P188, DOI 10.1080/00048408712342871 ; Gupta A., 1993, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V7, P359; Gupta A., 1993, PHILOS TOPICS, V21, P57, DOI DOI 10.5840/PHILTOPICS199321218; HORWICH P, 1995, MIND, V104, P355, DOI 10.1093/mind/104.414.355 ; HORWICH P, 1993, PHILOS PUBLIC AFF, V22, P67; HORWICH P, TRUTH; KIRKHAM R, THEORIES TRUTH; PUTNAM H., REASON TRUTH HIST; QUINE WV, PURSUIT TRUTH; QUINE WV, PHILOS LOGIC; SINNOTTARMSTRON.W, 1995, MODALITY MORALITY BE; SOAMES S, 1995, MODALITY MORALITY BE, P250; Sosa Ernest, 1993, PHILOS ISSUES, V3, P77; WILLIAMS M, 1988, MIND, V94, P415; WILSON K, 1990, TRUTH CONSEQUENCES, P19","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/106.421.69",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","WE409","WOS:A1997WE40900004",,,,,"2018-01-02",322.0,"davidsond devittm dunnm etchemendyj fieldh fieldh foxjf guptaa guptaa horwichp horwichp horwichp kirkhamr putnamh quinewv quinewv sinnottarmstronw soamess sosaernest williamsm wilsonk cartwrightr","cluster_0"
-0.5077984081913786,-0.45553981241129937,45.0,16.0,16.0,0.0,0.0,1996.0,105.0,418.0,269.0,301.0,33.0,"J","LAURENCE, S",,,,"LAURENCE, S",,,"A CHOMSKIAN ALTERNATIVE TO CONVENTION-BASED SEMANTICS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"ACQUISITION; LANGUAGE",,,"LAURENCE, S (reprint author), UNIV MANCHESTER,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,MANCHESTER M13 9PL,LANCS,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"BLOOM P, 1993, P 24TH ANN CHILD LAN, P23; Chomsky N., ASPECTS THEORY SYNTA; CHOMSKY N, REFLECTIONS LANGUAGE; CLARK E, 1993, P 24TH ANN CHILD LAN; Cooper William, 1979, SENTENCE PROCESSING; Curtiss S., 1988, LINGUISTICS CAMBRIDG, P96; FODOR JA, LANGUAGE THOUGHT; Fodor J. A., 1990, MIND COGNITION, P312; FODOR JA, MODULARITY MIND; FODOR JD, 1991, FDN ISSUES NATURAL L, P83; Forster Ken, 1979, SENTENCE PROCESSING, P27; Frazier L, 1987, MODULARITY KNOWLEDGE, P291; Frazier Lyn, 1988, LINGUISTICS CAMBRIDG, P15; Garfield JL, 1987, MODULARITY KNOWLEDGE; GARRETT M, 1990, LANGUAGE INVITATION, P133; Gleitman Lelia, 1990, LANG ACQUIS, V1, P3, DOI DOI 10.1207/S15327817LA0101_2; GOLDINMEADOW S, 1990, LANGUAGE, V66, P323, DOI 10.2307/414890 ; GOLDINMEADOW S, 1994, COGNITIVE PSYCHOL, V27, P259, DOI 10.1006/cogp.1994.1018 ; GRICE HP, STUDIES WAY WORDS; HAPPE F, AUTISM; JACKENDOFF R, PATTERNS MIND; Kasher Asa, 1991, CHOMSKYAN TURN; LEWIS D, PHILOS PAPERS, V1; LEWIS D, CONVENTION PHILOS ST; LYCAN WG, 1990, MIND COGNITION; MARKMAN E, CATEGORIZATION NAMIN; MARSLENWILSON WD, 1987, MODULARITY KNOWLEDGE, P37; MATTHEWS R, 1991, CHOMSKYAN TURN, P182; MAY R, LOGICAL FORM ITS STR; NEWMEYER FJ, 1988, LINGUISTICS CAMBRIDG; OSHERSON D, 1990, LANGUAGE; PETITTO LA, 1987, COGNITION, V27, P1, DOI 10.1016/0010-0277(87)90034-5; Pinker S., LANGUAGE INSTINCT; POIZNER H, WHAT HANDS REVEAL BR; PRICHETT B, GRAMMATICAL COMPETEN; SCHIFFER S, MEANING; Schiffer S, 1982, NOTRE DAME J FORM L, V23, P119; SCHIFFER S, REMNANTS MEANING; SELLS P, 1991, F ISSUES NATURAL LAN; SMITH N, 1991, LINGUA, V84, P15; SMITH N, MIND SAVANT; STABLER EP, 1983, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V6, P391, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X00016678 ; SWINNEY D, UNPUB COREFERENCE AS; WALLMAN J, APING LANGUAGE; Zurif E. B., 1990, LANGUAGE INVITATION, P177","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/105.418.269",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","UG797","WOS:A1996UG79700004",,,,,"2018-01-02",323.0,"chomskyn chomskyn clarke cooperwilliam curtisss fodorja fodorja fodorja fodorjd forsterken frazierl frazierlyn garfieldjl garrettm gleitmanlelia goldinmeadows goldinmeadows gricehp happef jackendoffr kasherasa lewisd lewisd lycanwg markmane marslenwilsonwd matthewsr mayr newmeyerfj oshersond petittola pinkers poiznerh prichettb schiffers schiffers schiffers sellsp smithn smithn stablerep swinneyd wallmanj zurifeb bloomp","cluster_3"
-0.23018685368449174,-0.23494725994436094,14.0,16.0,17.0,0.0,0.0,1991.0,100.0,400.0,439.0,459.0,21.0,"J","MILLIKAN, RG",,,,"MILLIKAN, RG",,,"PERCEPTUAL CONTENT AND FREGEAN MYTH","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"MILLIKAN, RG (reprint author), UNIV CONNECTICUT,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,STORRS,CT 06268, USA.",,,,,,"Campbell J., 1987, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V88, P273; CRANE T, 1988, ANALYSIS, V48, P142, DOI 10.2307/3328218 ; DENNETT D, IN PRESS BRAIN BEHAV; Evans G., 1985, COLLECT PAPERS, P364; Evans G., 1980, PHILOS SUBJECTS ESSA, P76; Evans G., 1982, VARIETIES REFERENCE; Goodman N., 1966, STRUCTURE APPEARANCE; MILLIKAN RG, IN PRESS WHITE QUEEN; Millikan R. G., 1984, LANGUAGE THOUGHT OTH; PEACOCKE C, 1987, PHILOS REV, V96, P383, DOI 10.2307/2185226 ; Peacocke C., 1989, THEMES KAPLAN, P297; Peacocke Christopher, 1986, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V60, P1; Peacocke Christopher, 1989, TRANSCENDENTAL ARGUM; Peacocke Ch., 1983, SENSE AND CONTENT","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","GL556","WOS:A1991GL55600002",,,,,"2018-01-02",324.0,"cranet dennettd evansg evansg evansg goodmann millikanrg millikanrg peacockec peacockec peacockechristopher peacockechristopher peacockech campbellj","cluster_0"
-0.17322735738526895,0.07477794990107574,6.0,16.0,16.0,0.0,0.0,1991.0,100.0,398.0,277.0,281.0,5.0,"J","SCHUELER, GF",,,,"SCHUELER, GF",,,"PRO-ATTITUDES AND DIRECTION OF FIT","MIND",,,"English","Discussion",,,,,,,"MOTIVATION",,,"SCHUELER, GF (reprint author), UNIV NEW MEXICO,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,ALBUQUERQUE,NM 87131, USA.",,,,,,"Anscombe G. E. M., 1957, INTENTION; PETTIT P, 1987, MIND, V96, P530; Platts M., 1979, WAYS MEANING; Searle J. R., 1983, INTENTIONALITY; SMITH M, 1987, MIND, V96, P36; SMITH M, 1988, MIND, V97, P589","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","FK600","WOS:A1991FK60000007",,,,,"2018-01-02",325.0,"pettitp plattsm searlejr smithm smithm anscombegem","cluster_6"
-0.1697956100565076,-0.11689840467236674,4.0,16.0,16.0,0.0,0.0,1990.0,99.0,394.0,255.0,266.0,12.0,"J","MCDOWELL, J",,,,"MCDOWELL, J",,,"PEACOCKE AND EVANS ON DEMONSTRATIVE CONTENT","MIND",,,"English","Discussion",,,,,,,,,,"MCDOWELL, J (reprint author), UNIV PITTSBURGH,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,PITTSBURGH,PA 15260, USA.",,,,,,"EVANS G, VARIETIES REFERENCE; MCDOWELL J, 1969, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, P181; Peacocke C., 1986, THOUGHTS; PEACOCKE C, SENSE CONTENT","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","DA146","WOS:A1990DA14600006",,,,,"2018-01-02",326.0,"mcdowellj peacockec peacockec evansg","cluster_0"
0.05465936262664329,0.025126692370654003,3.0,16.0,16.0,0.0,0.0,1982.0,91.0,361.0,115.0,120.0,6.0,"J","AUDI, R",,,,"AUDI, R",,,"BELIEVING AND AFFIRMING","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"AUDI, R (reprint author), UNIV NEBRASKA,LINCOLN,NE 68588, USA.",,,,,,"CORNMAN J, 1977, AM PHILOS Q, V14, P290; FOLEY R, 1978, AM PHILOS Q, V15; PLATO, MENO","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","MY218","WOS:A1982MY21800011",,,,,"2018-01-02",327.0,"foleyr plato cornmanj","cluster_2"
-0.025759266532630117,0.27400467196123535,16.0,16.0,16.0,0.0,0.0,1980.0,89.0,356.0,565.0,576.0,12.0,"J","YOUNG, R",,,,"YOUNG, R",,,"AUTONOMY AND SOCIALIZATION","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"YOUNG, R (reprint author), LA TROBE UNIV,BUNDOORA,VIC 3083,AUSTRALIA.",,,,,,"BARROW R, 1975, MORAL PHILOSOPHY ED; BENN S, 1980, COMMUNITY; Block N. J., 1976, IQ CONTROVERSY; DEARDEN RF, 1975, PHILOSOPHERS DISCUSS; DWORKIN G, 1976, HASTINGS CENT REP, V6, P23, DOI 10.2307/3560358 ; Dworkin Gerald, 1970, NOUS, V4, P367; FEINBERG J, UNPUBLISHED; FEINBERG J, 1973, SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY; Frankfurt H., 1971, J PHILOS, V68, P5, DOI DOI 10.2307/2024717; FREUD S, NOTES CASE OBSESSION; Greenstein FI, 1965, CHILDREN POLITICS; HOSPERS J, 1958, DETERMINISM FREEDOM; NEELY W, 1974, PHILOS REV, V83, P32, DOI 10.2307/2183872 ; YOUNG R, 1980, AM PHILOS QUART, V17, P35; Young Robert, 1975, FREEDOM RESPONSIBILI; YOUNG R, 1979, NOUS, V13, P461","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","KN870","WOS:A1980KN87000005",,,,,"2018-01-02",328.0,"benns blocknj deardenrf dworking dworkingerald feinbergj feinbergj frankfurth freuds greensteinfi hospersj neelyw youngr youngrobert youngr barrowr","cluster_4"
-0.1877682158297566,-0.14735454471092668,17.0,16.0,16.0,0.0,0.0,1975.0,84.0,335.0,338.0,354.0,17.0,"J","MILLER, B",,,,"MILLER, B",,,"IN DEFENCE OF PREDICATE EXISTS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"UNIV NEW ENGLAND,ARMIDALE,NEW S WALES,AUSTRALIA",,,,,,,"AYER AJ, 1947, LANGUAGE TRUTH LOGIC, P43; DUMMETT M, 1973, FREGE PHILOS LANGUAG, P386; GEACH P, 1960, PHILOSOPHICAL WRITIN, P50; Geach P. T., 1968, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V42, P7; Hintikka Jaakko, 1969, MODELS MODALITIES; KEARNS JT, 1968, NOTRE DAME J FORMAL, V9, P322; KEARNS JT, 1968, NOTRE DAME J FORMAL, V9, P320; KEARNS JT, 1968, NOTRE DAME J FORMAL, V9; LONDEY D, TREATISE HUMAN NAT 2; LONDEY DG, 1970, PHILOSOPHIA ARHUSIEN, P6; LUCAS JR, 1973, TREATISE TIME SPACE, P299; PEARS D, 1968, STUDIES PHILOSOPHY T; Quine Willard Van Orman, 1960, WORD OBJECT; REDMON RB, 1973, MIND, V72; RUSSELL, 1973, AUSTRALASIAN J PHILO, V51, P201; SALMON W, 1957, PHILOSOPHICAL REV, V55, P535; WILLIAMS CJF, 1969, PHILOS Q, V44, P222","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","AJ175","WOS:A1975AJ17500002",,,,,"2018-01-02",329.0,"dummettm geachp geachpt hintikkajaakko kearnsjt kearnsjt kearnsjt londeyd londeydg lucasjr pearsd quinewillardvanorman redmonrb russell salmonw williamscjf ayeraj","cluster_0"
0.011230503950536028,0.1052267060343496,2.0,16.0,16.0,0.0,0.0,1963.0,72.0,288.0,599.0,599.0,1.0,"J","MCCLOSKEY, HJ",,,,"MCCLOSKEY, HJ",,,"A NOTE ON UTILITARIAN PUNISHMENT","MIND",,,"English","Discussion",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"HART HLA, 1959, ARISTOTELIAN SOCY P, V60, P1; 1957, PHILOS REV, V66, P466","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","CCP54","WOS:A1963CCP5400018",,,,,"2018-01-02",331.0,"harthla","cluster_4"
-0.6829649653310081,-0.6014335204568492,31.0,15.0,15.0,0.0,1.0,2014.0,123.0,489.0,129.0,156.0,28.0,"J","Vetter, B",,,,"Vetter, Barbara",,,"Dispositions without Conditionals","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"POSSIBLE WORLDS","Dispositions are modal properties. The standard conception of dispositions holds that each disposition is individuated by its stimulus condition(s) and its manifestation(s), and that their modality is best captured by some conditional construction that relates stimulus to manifestation as antecedent to consequent. I propose an alternative conception of dispositions: each disposition is individuated by its manifestation alone, and its modality is closest to that of possibility-a fragile vase, for instance, is one that can break easily. The view is expounded in some detail and defended against the major objections.","Humboldt Univ, Berlin, Germany","Vetter, B (reprint author), Humboldt Univ, Berlin, Germany.","barbara.vetter@philosophie.hu-berlin.de",,,,,"Austin J. L., 1961, PHILOS PAPERS; Bird A, 1998, PHILOS QUART, V48, P227, DOI 10.1111/1467-9213.00098 ; Bird Alexander, 2007, NATURES METAPHYSICS; Bird Alexander, 2012, PROPERTIES POWERS ST; Carroll John W., 2008, NOTRE DAME PHILOS RE; Choi S, 2006, SYNTHESE, V148, P369, DOI 10.1007/s11229-004-6229-z; EIKMEYER HJ, 1981, WORDS WORLDS CONTEXT; Fara M, 2005, NOUS, V39, P43, DOI 10.1111/j.0029-4624.2005.00493.x ; Fara M, 2008, MIND, V117, P843, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzn078; HONORE AM, 1964, MIND, V73, P463; HORGAN T, 1979, SOUTHERN J PHILOS, V17, P345, DOI 10.1111/j.2041-6962.1979.tb00250.x ; Jacobs JD, 2010, PHILOS STUD, V151, P227, DOI 10.1007/s11098-009-9427-1; KJELLMER G, 1986, STUD NEOPHILOL, V58, P11, DOI 10.1080/00393278608587929 ; LEWIS D, 1976, AM PHILOS QUART, V13, P145; Lewis D, 1997, PHILOS QUART, V47, P143, DOI 10.1111/1467-9213.00052 ; Lewis David, 2011, MONIST, V94, P19; Manley D, 2008, MIND, V117, P59, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzn003; Manley D, 2007, PHILOS QUART, V57, P68, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.469.x ; Manley D, 2011, MIND, V120, P1191, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzr078; MARTIN CB, 1994, PHILOS QUART, V44, P1, DOI 10.2307/2220143 ; McKitrick J, 2003, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V81, P155, DOI 10.1080/713659629 ; Molnar George, 2003, POWERS STUDY METAPHY; Peacocke C., 1999, BEING KNOWN; Sainsbury M., 1997, PHILOS PHENOMENOLOGI, V57, P907; Steinberg JR, 2010, PHILOS STUD, V148, P323, DOI 10.1007/s11098-008-9325-y; Vetter B, 2013, PHILOS QUART, V63, P330, DOI 10.1111/1467-9213.12024; Vetter B, 2011, MIND, V120, P1173, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzr077; Vihvelin Kadri, 2004, PHILOS TOPICS, V32, P427, DOI DOI 10.5840/PHILTOPICS2004321/211; von Stechow Arnim, 1991, SEMANTIK EIN INT HDB, P639; Williamson T., 2000, KNOWLEDGE ITS LIMITS; Williamson T., 1994, VAGUENESS","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423","1460-2113",,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzu032",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","AQ3UZ","WOS:000342720300005",,,,,"2018-01-02",332.0,"birda birdalexander birdalexander carrolljohnw chois eikmeyerhj faram faram honoream horgant jacobsjd kjellmerg lewisd lewisd lewisdavid manleyd manleyd manleyd martincb mckitrickj molnargeorge peacockec sainsburym steinbergjr vetterb vetterb vihvelinkadri vonstechowarnim williamsont williamsont austinjl","cluster_3"
-0.008790153178415545,0.0029775475136839635,30.0,15.0,15.0,0.0,16.0,2012.0,121.0,482.0,243.0,267.0,25.0,"J","Baker, A",,,,"Baker, Alan",,,"Science-Driven Mathematical Explanation","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"Philosophers of mathematics have become increasingly interested in the explanatory role of mathematics in empirical science, in the context of new versions of the Quinean 'Indispensability Argument' which employ inference to the best explanation for the existence of abstract mathematical objects. However, little attention has been paid to analysing the nature of the explanatory relation involved in these mathematical explanations in science (MES). In this paper, I attack the only articulated account of MES in the literature (an account sketched by Mark Steiner), according to which a genuine MES incorporates an explanatory proof of the mathematical result being used. The central case study involves an explanation for why bees build the cells of their honeycombs in the shape of hexagons. I make a distinction between two kinds of MES, mathematics-driven explanation in science and science-driven mathematical explanation, and argue that it is the second category which is both scientifically and philosophical more central. I conclude that the explanatory relation involved in MES is genuinely scientific and hence that the phenomenon of MES poses a challenge to general accounts of scientific explanation.","Swarthmore Coll, Swarthmore, PA 19081 USA","Baker, A (reprint author), Swarthmore Coll, Swarthmore, PA 19081 USA.","abaker1@swarthmore.edu",,,,,"Arana A, 2009, PHILOS MATH, V17, P189, DOI 10.1093/philmat/nkn015; Baker A, 2005, MIND, V114, P223, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzi223; Baker A, 2008, ERKENNTNIS, V68, P331, DOI 10.1007/s10670-008-9109-y; Bangu SI, 2008, SYNTHESE, V160, P13, DOI 10.1007/s11229-006-9070-8; Batterman R. W, 2002, DEVIL DETAILS ASYMPT; Bueno O, 2011, NOUS, V45, P345, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00772.x ; Carroll C., 2006, GEN HONEYCOMB THEORE; Cellucci Carlo, 2005, MATH REASONING HEURI; Colyvan M, 2002, MIND, V111, P69, DOI 10.1093/mind/111.441.69 ; Colyvan M., 2001, INDISPENSABILITY MAT; Colyvan M, 2010, MIND, V119, P285, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzq014; Daly C, 2009, PHILOS QUART, V59, P641, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2008.601.x; Hales TC, 2001, DISCRETE COMPUT GEOM, V25, P1, DOI 10.1007/s004540010071; Hempel Carl, 1973, ANN JAPAN ASS PHILOS, V4, P181; Kitcher P, 1989, SCI EXPLANATION; Landau E., 1958, ELEMENTARY NUMBER TH; Lange M., 2002, INTRO PHILOS PHYS LO; Lyon A, 2008, PHILOS MATH, V16, P227, DOI 10.1093/philmat/nkm025; Mancosu P., 2008, PHILOS MATH PRACTICE; Mancosu P., 2008, STANFORD ENCY PHILOS; Mancosu Paolo, 2005, VISUALIZATION EXPLAN; Melia J., 2002, MIND, V111, P75; Morgan F., 2000, GEOMETRIC MEASURE TH; Morrison M., 2000, UNIFYING SCI THEORIE; Pincock C, 2007, NOUS, V41, P253, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2007.00646.x ; Saatsi Juha, 2010, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, DOI 19.1093/bjps/axqo29; STEINER M, 1978, NOUS, V12, P17, DOI 10.2307/2214652 ; STEINER M, 1978, PHILOS STUD, V34, P135, DOI 10.1007/BF00354494 ; Wilson R., 2000, EXPLANATION COGNITIO; Woodward J., 2009, STANFORD ENCY PHILOS","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzs053",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","051HJ","WOS:000312116800001",,,,,"2018-01-02",333.0,"bakera bakera bangusi battermanrw buenoo carrollc celluccicarlo colyvanm colyvanm colyvanm dalyc halestc hempelcarl kitcherp landaue langem lyona mancosup mancosup mancosupaolo meliaj morganf morrisonm pincockc saatsijuha steinerm steinerm wilsonr woodwardj aranaa","cluster_0"
-0.041802568497765584,0.07469350023355971,24.0,15.0,15.0,0.0,2.0,2011.0,120.0,480.0,1053.0,1069.0,17.0,"J","Moss, S",,,,"Moss, Sarah",,,"Scoring Rules and Epistemic Compromise","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"CONDITIONALIZATION","It is commonly assumed that when we assign different credences to a proposition, a perfect compromise between our opinions simply 'splits the difference' between our credences. I introduce and defend an alternative account, namely that a perfect compromise maximizes the average of the expected epistemic values that we each assign to alternative credences in the disputed proposition. I compare the compromise strategy I introduce with the traditional strategy of compromising by splitting the difference, and I argue that my strategy is a reasonable characterization of epistemic compromise.","Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA","Moss, S (reprint author), Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.","ssmoss@umich.edu",,,,,"BERNARDO JM, 1985, BAYESIAN STAT, V2; Brier G., 1950, MONTHLY WEATHER REVI, V78, P1, DOI DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078<0001:VOFEIT>2.0.CO;2; Christensen D, 2007, PHILOS REV, V116, P187, DOI 10.1215/00318108-2006-035; Cohen G. A., 2000, YOURE EGALITARIAN CO; Elga Adam, 2006, NOUS, V41, P478; Fallis Don, 2007, Studia Logica, V86, P215, DOI 10.1007/s11225-007-9060-y; Feldman R., 2010, DISAGREEMENT; Hawthorne John, 2007, OXFORD STUDIES EPIST, V2; Genest C., 1986, STAT SCI, V1, P114, DOI DOI 10.1214/SS; GOOD IJ, 1952, J ROY STAT SOC B, V14, P107; Greaves H, 2006, MIND, V115, P607, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzl607; HUBER F, 2009, DEGREES BELIEF; JEFFREY R.C., 1992, PROBABILITY ART JUDG; Jeffrey Richard C., 1968, PROBABLE KNOWLEDGE, p[30, 166]; Jehle D, 2009, EPISTEME-J INDIV SOC, V6, P280, DOI 10.3366/E1742360009000719; Joyce JM, 1998, PHILOS SCI, V65, P575, DOI 10.1086/392661 ; Joyce J. M., 2007, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V107, P187; Lakatos Imre, 1968, PROBLEM INDUCTIVE LO; Oddie G, 1997, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V48, P533, DOI 10.1093/bjps/48.4.533 ; Percival P., 2002, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V76, P121; SAVAGE LJ, 1971, J AM STAT ASSOC, V66, P783, DOI 10.2307/2284229; Shogenji Tomoji, CONUNDRUM BAYESIAN E; SWANSON E, 2006, THESIS MIT; Weatherson Brian, DISAGREEMENTS PHILOS","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzs007",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","970PY","WOS:000306146000004",,,,,"2018-01-02",334.0,"brierg christensend cohenga elgaadam fallisdon feldmanr hawthornejohn genestc goodij greavesh huberf jeffreyrc jeffreyrichardc jehled joycejm joycejm lakatosimre oddieg percivalp savagelj shogenjitomoji swansone weathersonbrian bernardojm","cluster_3"
-0.4391042118080897,-0.39935127214754945,48.0,15.0,15.0,0.0,1.0,2008.0,117.0,468.0,1003.0,1033.0,31.0,"J","Wu, W",,,,"Wu, Wayne",,,"Visual Attention, Conceptual Content, and Doing it Right","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"NONCONCEPTUAL CONTENT; SEMANTIC DEMENTIA; OPTIC ATAXIA; OBJECT USE; KNOWLEDGE; MEMORY; AFFORDANCES; MECHANISMS; BRAIN","Reflection oil the fine-grained information required for visual guidance of action has suggested that visual content is non-conceptual. I argue that in a common type of visually guided action, namely the use of manipulable artefacts, vision has conceptual content. Specifically, I show that these actions require visual attention and that concepts are involved in directing attention. In acting with artefacts, there is a way of doing it right as determined by the artefact's conventional use. Attention must reflect our understanding of the function and appropriate ways to use these artefacts, understanding that requires possession of the relevant concept. As a result, we attend to the artefact's relevant functional properties. In these cases, attention is structured by concepts.","Ohio State Univ, Dept Philosophy, Columbus, OH 43210 USA","Wu, W (reprint author), Ohio State Univ, Dept Philosophy, 350 Univ Hall, Columbus, OH 43210 USA.","wu.572@osu.edu",,,,,"Anderson M. L., 2006, PHENOMENOLOGY COGNIT, V5, P125; BODEN MA, 1990, PHILOS ARTIFICIAL IN; Bozeat S, 2002, NEUROCASE, V8, P127, DOI 10.1076/neur.8.1.127.16232; Bratman M, 1987, INTENTION PLANS PRAC; Campbell J, 2002, REFERENCE CONSCIOUSN; Chemero A, 2003, ECOL PSYCHOL, V15, P181, DOI 10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_5 ; Clark A, 2001, PHILOS REV, V110, P495, DOI 10.1215/00318108-110-4-495; CRANE T, 1992, HIS CONTENTS EXPERIE, P136; Creem SH, 2001, J EXP PSYCHOL HUMAN, V27, P218, DOI 10.1037/0096-1523.27.1.218; DAVIDSON D, 1980, HIS ESSAYS ACTIONS E, P3; DESMIONE R, 1995, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V18, P193; Evans G., 1982, VARIETIES REFERENCE; Fodor J, 2004, MIND LANG, V19, P29, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2004.00245.x ; Gibson J. J., 1979, ECOLOGICAL APPROACH; Glover S, 2004, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V27, P3; Goodale M. A., 2005, SIGHT UNSEEN EXPLORA; Gunther Y., 2003, ESSAYS NONCONCEPTUAL; Heck RG, 2000, PHILOS REV, V109, P483, DOI 10.1215/00318108-109-4-483 ; HEFT H, 1989, J THEOR SOC BEHAV, V19, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1989.tb00133.x ; Mele A., 1993, MENTAL CAUSATION; Hodges JR, 2000, BRAIN, V123, P1913, DOI 10.1093/brain/123.9.1913; James W., 1890, PRINCIPLES PSYCHOL, V1; Johnson-Frey SH, 2005, CEREB CORTEX, V15, P681, DOI 10.1093/cercor/bhh169; Martin A, 2001, CURR OPIN NEUROBIOL, V11, P194, DOI 10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00196-3; McDowell J., 1994, MIND WORLD; Mele Aired R., 1992, SPRINGS ACTION; Milner A., 1995, VISUAL BRAIN ACTION; MONSELL S, 2000, CONTROL COGNITIVE PR, V18; Pacherie E, 2008, COGNITION, V107, P179, DOI 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.003; Peacocke C, 2004, MIND LANG, V19, P85, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2004.00249.x ; PEACOCKE C, 1992, THEORY CONCEPTS; PERENIN MT, 1988, BRAIN, V111, P643, DOI 10.1093/brain/111.3.643 ; PRINZ W, 2002, COMMNON MECH PERCEPT; Pulvermuller F, 2005, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V6, P576, DOI 10.1038/nrn1706; ROESSLER J., 2003, AGENCY SELF AWARENES; Rossetti Y, 2003, EXP BRAIN RES, V153, P171, DOI 10.1007/s00221-003-1590-6; Saumier Daniel, 2002, Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep, V2, P516, DOI 10.1007/s11910-002-0039-9; Steup Matthias, 2004, CONT DEBATES EPISTEM; Speaks J, 2005, PHILOS REV, V114, P359, DOI 10.1215/00318108-114-3-359 ; STEWARD H, 1997, ONTOLOGY MIND; STROEBE W, 1993, EUROPEAN REV SOCIAL; Thompson-Schill SL, 2003, NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, V41, P280, DOI 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00161-6 ; Tranel D, 2003, COGN NEUROPSYCHOL, V20, P409, DOI 10.1080/02643290244000248; TUIVING E, 2000, OXFORD HDB MEMORY; TUIVING E, 1972, ORG MEMORY; TULVING E, 1984, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V7, P223, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X0004440X ; Wolpert DM, 2000, NAT NEUROSCI, V3, P1212, DOI 10.1038/81497; WU W, NOUS IN PRESS","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzn082",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","400HP","WOS:000262858900009",,,,,"2018-01-02",335.0,"bodenma bozeats bratmanm campbellj chemeroa clarka cranet creemsh davidsond desmioner evansg fodorj gibsonjj glovers goodalema gunthery heckrg hefth melea hodgesjr jamesw johnsonfreysh martina mcdowellj meleairedr milnera monsells pacheriee peacockec peacockec pereninmt prinzw pulvermullerf roesslerj rossettiy saumierdaniel steupmatthias speaksj stewardh stroebew thompsonschillsl traneld tuivinge tuivinge tulvinge wolpertdm wuw andersonml","cluster_0"
-0.05570006157084328,-0.13276725900957664,23.0,15.0,15.0,1.0,1.0,2008.0,117.0,467.0,575.0,601.0,27.0,"J","Nadler, S",,,,"Nadler, Steven",,,"Spinoza and consciousness","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"Most discussions of Spinoza and consciousness- and there are not many conclude either that he does not have an account of consciousness, or that he does have one but that it is at best confused, at worst hopeless. I argue, in fact, that people have been looking in the wrong place for Spinoza's account of consciousness, namely, at his doctrine of 'ideas of ideas'. Indeed, Spinoza offers the possibility of a fairly sophisticated, naturalistic account of consciousness, one that grounds it in the nature and capacities of the body. Consciousness for Spinoza, I suggest, is a certain complexity in thinking that is the correlate of the complexity of a body, and human consciousness, for Spinoza, is nothing but the correlate in Thought of the extraordinarily high complexity of the human body in Extension. In this respect, Spinoza anticipates the conception of mind that is presently emerging from studies in the so-called 'embodied mind' research program. Moreover, this research program, in turn, may hold out hope for a clearer understanding of some of Spinoza's more difficult claims.","Univ Wisconsin, Dept Philosophy, Madison, WI 53711 USA","Nadler, S (reprint author), Univ Wisconsin, Dept Philosophy, 5185 Helen C White Hall,600 N Pk St, Madison, WI 53711 USA.","smnadler@wisc.edu",,,,,"Arnauld Antoine, 1775, OEUVRES MESSIRE A AR; Bennett Jonathan, 1984, STUDY SPINOZAS ETHIC; Block N, 2005, J PHILOS, V102, P259, DOI 10.5840/jphil2005102524 ; BURGE T, 2007, FDN MIND PHILOS ESSA, V2, P383; Chalmers D., 1995, J CONSCIOUSNESS STUD, V2, P200, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPR0F:0S0/9780195311105.003.0001; CURLEY E, 1988, GEOMETRIC METHOD; Curley Edwin M., 1969, SPINOZAS METAPHYSICS; DAMASIO A, 2001, LOOKING SPINOZA JOY; Damasio A. R., 1994, DESCARTES ERROR EMOT; Della Rocca Michael, 1996, REPRESENTATION MIND; DESCARTES R, 1974, OEUVRES DESCARTES; Descartes Rene, 1985, PHILOS WRITINGS DESC; HEINAMAA S, CONSCIOUSNE IN PRESS; Lakoff G., 1999, PHILOS FLESH EMBODIE; MATSON W, 1971, MONIST, V55, P568; Nadler S. M., 1989, ARNAULD CARTESIAN PH; RADNER D, 1971, PHILOS REV, V80, P338, DOI 10.2307/2184100 ; Shapiro L. A., 2004, THE MIND INCARNATE; Spinoza Baruch, 1984, COLLECTED WORKS SPIN, V1; Spinoza B., 1925, SPINOZA OPERA; WILSON M, 1999, IDEAS MECH ESSAYS EA, P126; Yovel Y., 1994, SPINOZA KNOWLEDGE HU; Huenemann C, 2008, INTERPRETING SPINOZA: CRITICAL ESSAYS, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511487200","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzn048",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","342UI","WOS:000258808700002",,,,,"2018-01-02",336.0,"bennettjonathan blockn burget chalmersd curleye curleyedwinm damasioa damasioar dellaroccamichael descartesr descartesrene heinamaas lakoffg matsonw nadlersm radnerd shapirola spinozabaruch spinozab wilsonm yovely huenemannc arnauldantoine","cluster_0"
-0.7599823852984869,-0.1913503352294239,42.0,15.0,15.0,0.0,0.0,2007.0,116.0,462.0,317.0,357.0,41.0,"J","Shoemaker, DW",,,,"Shoemaker, David W.",,,"Personal identity and practical concerns","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"SELF; REDUCTIONISM; REASONS; SELVES","Many philosophers have taken there to be an important relation between personal identity and several of our practical concerns (among them moral responsibility, compensation, and self-concern). I articulate four natural methodological assumptions made by those wanting to construct a theory of the relation between identity and practical concerns, and I point out powerful objections to each assumption, objections constituting serious methodological obstacles to the overall project. I then attempt to offer replies to each general objection in a way that leaves the project intact, albeit significantly changed. Perhaps the most important change stems from the recognition that the practical concerns motivating investigation into personal identity turn out to be not univocal, as is typically thought, such that each of the different practical concerns may actually be related to personal identity in very different ways.","Bowling Green State Univ, Dept Philosophy, Bowling Green, OH 43403 USA","Shoemaker, DW (reprint author), Bowling Green State Univ, Dept Philosophy, Bowling Green, OH 43403 USA.","dshoema@bgsu.edu",,,,,"Brink DO, 1997, SOC PHILOS POLICY, V14, P122, DOI 10.1017/S0265052500001709 ; BROWN S, 1977, REASON RELIG; BUTLER J., 1975, PERSONAL IDENTITY, P99; Dancy J., 1997, READING PARFIT; De Grazia D, 2005, HUMAN IDENTITY BIOET; Harris H., 1995, IDENTITY; JESKE D, 1993, PHILOS REV, V102, P541, DOI 10.2307/2185683 ; JOHNSTON M, 1987, J PHILOS, V84, P59, DOI 10.2307/2026626 ; JOHNSTON M, 1992, PHILOS REV, V101, P589, DOI 10.2307/2186058 ; Johnston Mark, 1997, READING PARFIT, P149; Johnston Mark, 1989, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V3, P369; Lewis D., 1976, IDENTITIES PERSONS, P17; MALCOLM N, 1977, PHILOS RELIG, P3981; MARTIN R, 1995, SELF CONCERN; MONTEFIORE A, 1973, PHILOS PERSONAL RELA; Noonan H. W., 1989, PERSONAL IDENTITY; Olson Eric, 1997, HUMAN ANIMAL; PARFIT D, 1986, ETHICS, V96, P832, DOI 10.1086/292802 ; Parfit D., 1984, REASONS PERSONS; PARFIT D, 1973, PHILOS PERSONAL RELA, P139; Perry J., 1975, PERSONAL IDENTITY; POJMAN LP, 2002, PHILOS RELIG; REID M, 1997, CONSTITUTION SELVES, V10, P211; REID T, 1785, ESSAYS INTELLECTUAL, P113; Rorty A., 1976, IDENTITIES PERSONS; Schechtman Marya, 1996, CONSTITUTION SELVES; Schoeman Ferdinand, 1987, RESPONSIBILITY CHARA; Shoemaker DW, 2000, CAN J PHILOS, V30, P343; Shoemaker DW, 2002, RATIO, V15, P58, DOI 10.1111/1467-9329.00176 ; Shoemaker DW, 1999, PAC PHILOS QUART, V80, P391, DOI 10.1111/1468-0114.00091 ; Shoemaker D., 2002, PHILOS, V5, P143; Sider T., 2001, 4 DIMENSIONALISM; Siderits M., 2003, PERSONAL IDENTITY BU; Stern Lawrence, 1974, J PHILOS, V71, P72; STRAKOWSKI SM, 1993, PSYCHIAT RES, V48, P1, DOI 10.1016/0165-1781(93)90107-R; SWINBURNE R, 1973, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V74, P231; Unger P., 1990, IDENTITY CONSCIOUSNE; van Inwagen P., 1998, POSSIBILITY RESURREC; Watson G., 2004, AGENCY ANSWERABILITY, P219; Watson Gary, 2003, FREE WILL; Wittgenstein Ludwig, 1969, CERTAINTY; WOLF S, 1986, ETHICS, V96, P704, DOI 10.1086/292796","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzm317",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","154MK","WOS:000245511400004",,,,,"2018-01-02",337.0,"browns butlerj dancyj degraziad harrish jesked johnstonm johnstonm johnstonmark johnstonmark lewisd malcolmn martinr montefiorea noonanhw olsoneric parfitd parfitd parfitd perryj pojmanlp reidm reidt rortya schechtmanmarya schoemanferdinand shoemakerdw shoemakerdw shoemakerdw shoemakerd sidert sideritsm sternlawrence strakowskism swinburner ungerp vaninwagenp watsong watsongary wittgensteinludwig wolfs brinkdo","cluster_3"
-0.6088078235137778,-0.5524498876063741,35.0,15.0,15.0,0.0,0.0,2005.0,114.0,456.0,1185.0,1222.0,38.0,"J","Szabo, ZG",,,,"Szabo, ZG",,,"The loss of uniqueness","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"QUANTIFICATION","Philosophers and linguists alike tend to call a semantic theory 'Russellian' just in case it assigns to sentences in which definite descriptions occur the truth-conditions Russell did in 'On Denoting'. This is unfortunate; not all aspects of those particular truth-conditions do explanatory work in Russell's writings. As far as the semantics of descriptions is concerned, the key insights of 'On Denoting' are that definite descriptions are not uniformly referring expressions, and that they are scope-bearing elements. Anyone who accepts these two claims can account for Russell's puzzle cases the way he did. Russell had no substantive argument for the claim that 'The F is G' entails 'There is at most one F'; in fact, he had important misgivings about it. I outline an argument against this claim, and I argue that by holding on to uniqueness contemporary semanticists make a momentous mistake: they keep the illusion alive that there is a way to account for linguistic meaning without addressing what linguistic expressions are for.","Cornell Univ, Sage Sch Philosophy, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA","Szabo, ZG (reprint author), Cornell Univ, Sage Sch Philosophy, 218 Goldwin Smith Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA.",,,,,,"BACH K, 1982, LINGUIST PHILOS, V4, P593, DOI 10.1007/BF00360807 ; Bach K, 1987, THOUGHT REFERENCE; Bach K., 1994, MIND LANG, V9, P124, DOI [10.1111/j.1468-0017.1994.tb00220.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1468-0017.1994.TB00220.X]; Bauerle R., 1983, MEANING USE INTERPRE; Breheny R., 1999, THESIS U COLL LONDON; Cooper Robin, 1975, THESIS U MASSACHUSET; DINNEEN D, 1979, SYNTAX SEMANTICS, V11; Elbourne PD, 2005, CURR STUD LINGUIST, P1; Graff D, 2001, PHILOS STUD, V102, P1, DOI 10.1023/A:1010379409594 ; GRICE P, 1981, STUDIES WAY WORDS, P269; Heim I., 1982, THESIS U MASSACHUSET; Hendriks H., 1993, THESIS U AMSTERDAM A; Kempson Ruth, 1975, PRESUPPOSITION DELIM; KEMPSON RM, 1981, LINGUIST PHILOS, V4, P259, DOI 10.1007/BF00350141 ; Kripke S., 1977, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, P255, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1475-4975.1977.TB00045.X; LAPPIN S, 1996, HDB SEMANTIC THEORY; LEWIS D, 1979, J PHILOS LOGIC, V1, P233; Lewis D., 1973, COUNTERFACTUALS; LUDLOW P, 1994, LINGUA STILE, V29, P165; May Robert C., 1977, THESIS MIT CAMBRIDGE; Neale S., 1990, DESCRIPTIONS; Reimer M., 2004, DESCRIPTIONS; Roberts C, 2003, LINGUIST PHILOS, V26, P287, DOI 10.1023/A:1024157132393 ; ROTHSCHILD D, 2004, UNPUB RUSSELLIAN DES; Russell B., 1918, MONIST, V28, P29; Russell B., 1903, PRINCIPLES MATH; RUSSELL B, 1957, MIND, V66; RUSSELL B, 1910, PRINCIPIA MATH, V56; Russell B., 1905, MIND, V14; Soames Scott, 2003, PHILOS ANAL 20 CENTU; Sperber Dan, 1986, RELEVANCE COMMUNICAT; STRAWSON P, 1950, READINGS PHILOS LANG, P335; Szabo ZG, 2003, PHILOS STUD, V114, P279, DOI 10.1023/A:1024904828212 ; Szabo ZG, 2000, PHILOS STUD, V101, P29, DOI 10.1023/A:1026437211756 ; ZVOLENSKY Z, 1997, APORIA, V7, P1","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423","1460-2113",,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzi1185",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","023FL","WOS:000236111100011",,,,,"2018-01-02",338.0,"bachk bachk bauerler brehenyr cooperrobin dinneend elbournepd graffd gricep heimi hendriksh kempsonruth kempsonrm kripkes lappins lewisd lewisd ludlowp mayrobertc neales reimerm robertsc rothschildd russellb russellb russellb russellb russellb soamesscott sperberdan strawsonp szabozg szabozg zvolenskyz bachk","cluster_3"
-0.16922495589577255,-0.02389715969064615,30.0,15.0,15.0,0.0,0.0,2003.0,112.0,448.0,653.0,683.0,31.0,"J","White, R",,,,"White, R",,,"The epistemic advantage of prediction over accommodation","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"NYU, Dept Philosophy, Silver Ctr 503, New York, NY 10003 USA","White, R (reprint author), NYU, Dept Philosophy, Silver Ctr 503, 100 Washington Sq E, New York, NY 10003 USA.","rlw5@nyu.edu",,,,,"ACHINSTEIN P, 1994, PSA 1994, V2, P156; Boyd R., 1984, SCI REALISM, P41; Brush S. G., 1994, PSA 1994, V2, P133; COLLINS R, 1994, NOUS, V28, P210, DOI 10.2307/2216049 ; DUHEM P, 1956, AIM STRUCTURE PHYSIC; Earman J., 1983, MINNESOTA STUDIES PH, VX; FINE A, 1988, P PHIL SCI ASS E LAN, V1; GIERE RN, 1983, MINN STUD PHILOS SCI, V10, P269; Gooding D., 1989, USES EXPT; Horwich P., 1982, PROBABILITY EVIDENCE; HOWSON C, 1991, PHILOS SCI, V58, P574, DOI 10.1086/289641 ; HULL D, 1994, P PHIL SCI ASS E LAN, V2; Keynes J. M., 1921, TREATISE PROBABILITY; Leplin Jarrett, 1997, NOVEL DEFENSE SCI RE; Leplin J., 1984, SCI REALISM; Levin M, 1984, SCI REALISM, P124; Lipton P., 1991, INFERENCE BEST EXPLA; Maher P, 1988, PSA 1988, V1, P273; Mill J. S., 1904, SYSTEM LOGIC; Musgrave Alan, 1988, RELATIVISM REALISM S, P229; PEIRCE Charles S, 1931, COLLECTED PAPERS CS; Pitt J. C., 1985, CHANGE PROGR MODERN; Psillos S., 1999, SCI REALISM SCI TRAC; Putnam H, 1975, MATH MATTER METHOD P, V1; Schlesinger G., 1987, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V65, P28; Van Frassen B., 1980, SCI IMAGE; Whewell William, 1860, PHILOS INDUCTIVE SCI; Worrall J., 1985, CHANGE PROGR MODERN, P301; Worrell John, 1989, USES EXPT, P135; ZAHAR E, 1973, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V24, P95, DOI 10.1093/bjps/24.2.95","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/112.448.653",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","741JM","WOS:000186455000003",,,,,"2018-01-02",339.0,"boydr brushsg collinsr duhemp earmanj finea gierern goodingd horwichp howsonc hulld keynesjm leplinjarrett leplinj levinm liptonp maherp milljs musgravealan peircecharless pittjc psilloss putnamh schlesingerg vanfrassenb whewellwilliam worrallj worrelljohn zahare achinsteinp","cluster_0"
0.024624935601578052,0.0338466032459488,1.0,15.0,15.0,0.0,0.0,2002.0,111.0,442.0,323.0,354.0,32.0,"J","Kamm, FM",,,,"Kamm, FM",,,"What we owe to each other","MIND",,,"English","Book Review",,,,,,,,,"NYU, Dept Philosophy, New York, NY 10003 USA","Kamm, FM (reprint author), NYU, Dept Philosophy, New York, NY 10003 USA.",,,,,,"Scanlon Thomas M., 1999, WHAT WE OWE EACH OTH","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/111.442.323",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","545WG","WOS:000175240100008",,,,,"2018-01-02",340.0,"scanlonthomasm","cluster_6"
-0.7904820717247482,-0.6853345338518513,17.0,15.0,16.0,0.0,0.0,1998.0,107.0,428.0,729.0,749.0,21.0,"J","Robertson, T",,,,"Robertson, T",,,"Possibilities and the arguments for origin essentialism (Nathan Salmon, Graeme Forbes)","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"Reed Coll, Dept Philosophy, Portland, OR 97202 USA","Robertson, T (reprint author), Reed Coll, Dept Philosophy, Portland, OR 97202 USA.",,,,,,"CARTWRIGHT RL, 1968, J PHILOS, V65, P615, DOI 10.2307/2024315 ; DAVIDSON D, 1972, SEMANTICS NATURAL LA; FORBES G, 1980, PHILOS STUD, V37, P353, DOI 10.1007/BF00354904 ; FORBES G, 1986, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V11, P3, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4975.1986.tb00486.x ; FORBES G, 1981, J PHILOS LOGIC, V10, P73, DOI 10.1007/BF00253913 ; Forbes Graeme, 1985, METAPHYSICS MODALITY; FORBES G, 1992, LANGUAGE TRUTH ONTOL, P118; Kripke S, 1972, NAMING NECESSITY; KRIPKE S, 1972, SEMANTICS NATURAL LA; Lewis D., 1986, PLURALITY WORLDS; MCGINN C, 1976, J PHILOS, V73, P127, DOI 10.2307/2025741 ; MULLIGAN K, 1992, LANGUAGE TRUTH ONTOL; NOONAN H, 1983, MIND, V92, P1; SALMON N, 1986, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V11, P75, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4975.1986.tb00489.x ; SALMON N, 1989, PHILOS REV, V98, P3, DOI 10.2307/2185369 ; Salmon Nathan U., 1981, REFERENCE ESSENCE; YABLO S, 1988, J PHILOS, V75, P329","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/107.428.729",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","130KZ","WOS:000076520400002",,,,,"2018-01-02",341.0,"davidsond forbesg forbesg forbesg forbesgraeme forbesg kripkes kripkes lewisd mcginnc mulligank noonanh salmonn salmonn salmonnathanu yablos cartwrightrl","cluster_3"
-0.563771003430738,-0.4193483994048167,12.0,15.0,15.0,0.0,0.0,1998.0,107.0,425.0,59.0,71.0,13.0,"J","Merricks, T",,,,"Merricks, T",,,"Against the doctrine of microphysical supervenience","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Philosophy, Richmond, VA 23284 USA","Merricks, T (reprint author), Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Philosophy, Richmond, VA 23284 USA.","tmerrick@saturn.vcu.edu",,,,,"KIM J, 1987, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V48, P315, DOI 10.2307/2107631 ; KIM J, 1982, PHILOS STUD, V41, P51, DOI 10.1007/BF00353523 ; Kim Jaegwon, 1993, SUPERVENIENCE MIND; LEWIS D, 1983, PHILOS STUD, V44, P197, DOI 10.1007/BF00354100 ; Lewis David, 1976, IDENTITIES PERSONS; Lewis D., 1986, PLURALITY WORLDS; MERRICKS T, 1995, MIND, V104, P523; Unger P., 1980, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V5, P411; Vallentyne P, 1997, PHILOS STUD, V88, P209, DOI 10.1023/A:1004250930900 ; VANINWAGEN P, 1990, NOUS, V24, P245, DOI 10.2307/2215526 ; VANINWAGEN P, 1981, PAC PHILOS QUART, V62, P123; van Inwagen Peter, 1990, MATERIAL BEINGS","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/107.425.59",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","YT694","WOS:000071633700003",,,,,"2018-01-02",342.0,"kimj kimjaegwon lewisd lewisdavid lewisd merrickst ungerp vallentynep vaninwagenp vaninwagenp vaninwagenpeter kimj","cluster_3"
-0.6888714046786443,-0.4805303336744643,55.0,15.0,15.0,0.0,0.0,1997.0,106.0,422.0,217.0,243.0,27.0,"J","Green, MS",,,,"Green, MS",,,"On the autonomy of linguistic meaning","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"Green, MS (reprint author), UNIV VIRGINIA,CORCORAN DEPT PHILOSOPHY,CHARLOTTESVILLE,VA 22903, USA.",,,,,,"Anscombe G. E. M., 1963, INTRO WITTGENSTEINS; AUSTIN JL, 1962, HOW TO DO THINGS WOR; Bach Kent, 1979, LINGUISTIC COMMUNICA; Bell D., 1979, FREGES THEORY JUDGME; BELNAP N, 1990, PHILOS STUD, V59, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF00368389 ; BELNAP N, 1993, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V8, P365; Bertolet R, 1994, FDN SPEECH ACT THEOR, P335; BRANDOM R, 1983, NOUS, V17, P637, DOI 10.2307/2215086 ; Brandom Robert, 1994, MAKING IT EXPLICIT R; CLARKE R, 1981, ACTA PHILOS FENN, V32, P44; Davidson D., 1982, COMMUNICATION CONVEN; Davidson D., 1975, THOUGHT TALK; DAVIDSON D, 1979, MOODS PERFORMANCES; DAVIDSON D., 1984, INQUIRIES TRUTH INTE; Dudman V. H., 1970, PHILOS Q, V20, P150; Dummett M., 1993, SEAS LANGUAGE; Dummett Michael, 1973, FREGE PHILOS LANGUAG; Evans G., 1982, VARIETIES REFERENCE; Frege Gottlob, 1879, BEGRIFFSSCHRIFT, P1; FREGE G, 1883, PURPOSE BEGRIFFSSCHR; FREGE G, 1893, BASIC LAWS ARITHMITH; FREGE G, 1882, SCI JUSTIFICATION CO; Frege Gottlob, 1984, COLLECTED PAPERS MAT; Frege Gottlob, 1980, PHILOS MATH CORRES; Frege Gottlob, 1979, POSTHUMOUS WRITINGS; GEACH P. T., 1976, ACTA PHILOS FENN, P54; Geach P., 1972, LOGIC MATTERS; GEACH PT, 1965, PHILOS REV, V74, P449, DOI 10.2307/2183123 ; GEACH PT, 1960, PHILOS REV, V69, P221, DOI 10.2307/2183506 ; GREEN M, 1993, ILLOCUTIONS ATTITUDE; GREEN MS, 1995, LINGUIST PHILOS, V18, P83, DOI 10.1007/BF00984962 ; Grice H. Paul, 1975, STUDIES WAY WORDS; HARE RM, 1970, PHILOS REV, V79, P3, DOI 10.2307/2184066 ; HARE RM, 1989, MIND, V98, P23; Harnish Robert M., 1994, FDN SPEECH ACT THEOR, P407; HARRAH D, 1980, PAC PHILOS QUART, V61, P204; Hooper Joan B., 1975, SYNTAX SEMANTICS, V4, P91; HUDDLESTON Rodney, 1984, INTRO GRAMMAR ENGLIS; McArthur R. P., 1974, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, V15, P225, DOI 10.1305/ndjfl/1093891300; MCCAWLEY JD, 1982, LINGUIST INQ, V13, P91; MCCAWLEY JD, 1981, LINGUA, V53, P99, DOI 10.1016/0024-3841(81)90014-0 ; Nunberg Geoffrey, 1990, LINGUISTICS PUNCTUAT; PENDLEBURY M, 1986, MIND, V95, P361; Recanati F., 1987, MEANING FORCE PRAGMA; Reichenbach H., 1947, ELEMENTS SYMBOLIC LO; SEARLE J, 1985, F ILLOCUTIONARY LOGI; Segal Gabriel, 1990, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, VXCI, P103; STENIUS E, 1967, SYNTHESE, V17, P254, DOI 10.1007/BF00485030 ; STENIUS E, 1981, WITTGENSTEINS TRACTA; TSOHATZIDIS S, 1994, F SPEECH ACT THEORY; URMSON JO, 1976, AM PHILOS QUART, V13, P153; Urmson J. O., 1952, MIND, V61, P480, DOI DOI 10.1093/MIND/LXI.244.480; VANDERVEKEN Daniel, 1990, MEANING SPEECH ACTS; Walton K.L., 1990, MIMESIS MAKE BELIEVE; WITTGENSTEIN L, TRACTATUS LOGICO-PHI","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/106.422.217",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","WR328","WOS:A1997WR32800001",,,,,"2018-01-02",343.0,"austinjl bachkent belld belnapn belnapn bertoletr brandomr brandomrobert clarker davidsond davidsond davidsond davidsond dudmanvh dummettm dummettmichael evansg fregegottlob fregeg fregeg fregeg fregegottlob fregegottlob fregegottlob geachpt geachp geachpt geachpt greenm greenms gricehpaul harerm harerm harnishrobertm harrahd hooperjoanb huddlestonrodney mcarthurrp mccawleyjd mccawleyjd nunberggeoffrey pendleburym recanatif reichenbachh searlej segalgabriel steniuse steniuse tsohatzidiss urmsonjo urmsonjo vandervekendaniel waltonkl wittgensteinl anscombegem","cluster_0"
-0.6235761242085928,-0.2730006179790959,12.0,15.0,15.0,0.0,0.0,1997.0,106.0,421.0,53.0,67.0,15.0,"J","Hughes, C",,,,"Hughes, C",,,"Same-kind coincidence and the ship of Theseus + A challenge to Locke's principle","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"Hughes, C (reprint author), UNIV LONDON KINGS COLL,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,LONDON WC2R 2LS,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"Field H., 1973, J PHILOS, V70, p[462, 89]; Hobbes T., 2010, ELEMENTS LAW NATURAL; HUGHES C, IN PRESS MEDIAEVAL P; Lewis D, 1979, PHILOS PAPERS, VI, P233; Locke John, ESSAY HUMAN UNDERSTA; NOONAN H, PERSONAL IDENTITY; NOONAN HW, 1985, INQUIRY, V28, P195, DOI 10.1080/00201748508602052 ; NOZICK R, PHILOS EXPLANATIONS; SALMON N, REFERENCE ESSENCE; SHOEMAKER S, PERSONAL IDENTITY; SIMONS PM, PARTS STUDY ONTOLOGY; WIGGINS D, 1968, PHILOS REV, V77, P90, DOI 10.2307/2183184","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/106.421.53",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","WE409","WOS:A1997WE40900003",,,,,"2018-01-02",344.0,"hobbest hughesc lewisd lockejohn noonanh noonanhw nozickr salmonn shoemakers simonspm wigginsd fieldh","cluster_3"
-0.836620681319173,2.3784274384725332,78.0,15.0,15.0,0.0,3.0,1996.0,105.0,420.0,531.0,552.0,22.0,"J","Hooker, B",,,,"Hooker, B",,,"Ross-style pluralism versus rule-consequentialism","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"Hooker, B (reprint author), UNIV READING,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,READING RG6 2AH,BERKS,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"ANSCOMBE GEM, 1958, PHILOSOPHY, V33, P1, DOI 10.1017/S0031819100037943 ; Aristotle, NICOMACHEAN ETHICS; AUDI R, 1993, MONIST, V76, P296; Audi Robert, 1996, MORAL KNOWLEDGE, P101; Barrow Robin, 1991, UTILITARIANISM CONT; Brandt R., 1979, THEORY GOOD RIGHT; Brandt Richard, 1963, MORALITY LANGUAGE CO, P107; BRANDT RB, 1989, AM PHILOS QUART, V26, P89; BRANDT RB, 1988, ETHICS, V98, P341, DOI 10.1086/292945 ; Brandt Richard B., 1992, MORALITY UTILITARIAN; Brandt Richard B., 1959, ETHICAL THEORY; BRANDT RB, 1967, U COLORADO STUDIES, V3; BRINK D, 1989, MORAL REALISM FOUNDA; Broad C. D., 1930, 5 TYPES ETHICAL THEO; CLARKE S, DISCOURSE NATURAL RE; DANCY J, 1983, MIND, V95, P530; Dancy Jonathan, 1993, MORAL REASONS; Davidson Donald, 1969, MORAL CONCEPTS, p[93, 105]; DOSTOEVSKI FM, BROTHERS KARAMAZOV; Dworkin R, 1996, PHILOS PUBLIC AFF, V25, P87, DOI 10.1111/j.1088-4963.1996.tb00036.x ; ELLIS A, 1995, ETHICS, V106, P112, DOI 10.1086/293780 ; FRANKENA W, 1993, RATIONALITY RULES UT, P189; FRAZIER RL, 1995, RATIO, V8, P113, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9329.1995.tb00074.x ; Gaut B., 1993, PHILOS PAPERS, VXXII, P17; Griffin J, 1996, VALUE JUDGEMENT IMPR; HAMPSHIRE Stuart, 1992, INNOCENCE EXPERIENCE; Hare R.M., 1975, READING RAWLS, P81; HARRISON J, 1952, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V53, P105; Harrod R. F., 1936, MIND, V45, P137; HARSANYI J, 1993, RATIONALITY RULES UT, P115; Harsanyi J., 1982, UTILITARIANISM, P39; HASLETT D, 1987, EQUAL CONSIDERATION; HOOKER B, 1990, MIND, V99, P67; HOOKER B, 1995, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V95, P19; HOOKER B, 1994, AM PHILOS QUART, V31, P311; HOOKER B, 1993, RATIONALITY RULES UT; HOOKER B, 1991, UTILITAS, V3, P263; HOOKER B, 1991, MIND, V100, P270; HOSPERS J, 1961, HUMAN CONDUCT INTRO; Hurka T., 1993, PERFECTIONISM; JOHNSON C, 1991, MORAL LEGISLATION; Kagan Shelly, 1989, LIMITS MORALITY; LEGUIN U, ONES WHO WALK AWAY F; MacIntyre A., 1981, AFTER VIRTUE; MCNAUGHTON D, 1996, PHILOS QUART, V46, P433, DOI 10.2307/2956354 ; McNaughton D., 1988, MORAL VISION; MOORE G. E, 1903, PRINCIPIA ETHICA; Nagel T, 1991, EQUALITY PARTIALITY, V33; Nagel T., 1986, VIEW NOWHERE; NAGEL T., 1979, MORTAL QUESTIONS; NELSON MT, 1990, METAPHILOSOPHY, V21, P282, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9973.1990.tb00530.x ; PRICE R, 1969, REV PRINCIPAL QUESTI; Prichard H. A., 1912, MIND, V21, P21, DOI DOI 10.1093/MIND/XXI.81.21; Rakowski Eric, 1991, EQUAL JUSTICE; Raphael D.-D., 1969, BRIT MORALISTS; Raphael DD, 1994, MORAL PHILOS; RAWLS J, 1980, J PHILOS, V77, P515, DOI 10.2307/2025790 ; Rawls John, 1955, PHILOS REV, V64, P3, DOI DOI 10.2307/2182230; Rawls J., 1951, PHILOS REV, V60, P177; Rawls John, 1971, THEORY JUSTICE; Reid Thomas, ESSAYS ACTIVE POWERS; ROSS WD, 1939, F ETHICS; Ross W. D., 1930, RIGHT GOOD; Ryan Alan, 1979, IDEA FREEDOM ESSAYS; Scanlon T. M, 1982, UTILITARIANISM, P103; Scheffler Samuel, 1982, REJECTION CONSEQUENT; Scheffler S., 1992, HUMAN MORALITY; SEN A, 1982, UTILITARIANISM BEYON; Sidgwick H., 1907, METHODS ETHICS; Slote Michael, 1992, MORALITY VIRTUE; Thomson J. J., 1990, REALM RIGHTS; Toulmin S. E., 1950, EXAMINATION PLACE RE; Urmson J. O., 1953, PHILOS Q, V3, P33; URMSON JO, 1974, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V75, P111; Williams B, 1985, ETHICS LIMITS PHILOS; Williams B., 1995, MAKING SENSE HUMANIT; Williams B., 1972, MORALITY INTRO ETHIC; Williams Bernard, 1973, UTILITARIANISM, P77","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/105.420.531",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","VM759","WOS:A1996VM75900001",,,,,"2018-01-02",345.0,"aristotle audir audirobert barrowrobin brandtr brandtrichard brandtrb brandtrb brandtrichardb brandtrichardb brandtrb brinkd broadcd clarkes dancyj dancyjonathan davidsondonald dostoevskifm dworkinr ellisa frankenaw frazierrl gautb griffinj hampshirestuart harerm harrisonj harrodrf harsanyij harsanyij haslettd hookerb hookerb hookerb hookerb hookerb hookerb hospersj hurkat johnsonc kaganshelly leguinu macintyrea mcnaughtond mcnaughtond moorege nagelt nagelt nagelt nelsonmt pricer prichardha rakowskieric raphaeldd raphaeldd rawlsj rawlsjohn rawlsj rawlsjohn reidthomas rosswd rosswd ryanalan scanlontm schefflersamuel schefflers sena sidgwickh slotemichael thomsonjj toulminse urmsonjo urmsonjo williamsb williamsb williamsb williamsbernard anscombegem","cluster_6"
-0.5503035047806296,-0.4808326089101099,19.0,15.0,15.0,0.0,1.0,1994.0,103.0,411.0,337.0,349.0,13.0,"J","PRIEST, G",,,,"PRIEST, G",,,"IS ARITHMETIC CONSISTENT","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"PRIEST, G (reprint author), UNIV QUEENSLAND,ST LUCIA,QLD 4067,AUSTRALIA.",,,,,,"Putnam H., 1964, PHILOS MATH SELECTED; Boolos G., 1974, COMPUTABILITY LOGIC; DARTNALL T, 1994, CREATIVITY; DIAMOND C, 1976, WITTGENSTEINS LECTUR; DOWDEN BH, 1984, J PHILOS LOGIC, V13, P125, DOI 10.1007/BF00453017 ; FRAENKEL AA, 1973, F SET THEORY; HILBERT D, 1925, MATH ANN, V95, P161; Kripke Saul Aaron, 1982, WITTGENSTEIN RULES P; LAUDEN L, 1977, PROGR PROBLEMS THEOR; LEWIS D, 1984, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V62, P221, DOI 10.1080/00048408412340013 ; MEYER RK, 1984, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V49, P917, DOI 10.2307/2274145 ; Meyer R., 1976, B SECTION LOGIC, V5, P133; PRIEST G, 1983, PHILOS QUART, V33, P160, DOI 10.2307/2218742 ; Priest G., 1991, STUDIA LOGICA, V50, P321, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ARTINT.2010.06.001; Priest G., 1987, CONTRADICTION; PRIEST G, 1994, CREATIVITY; PUTNAM H, 1983, REALISM REASON PHILO, V3, P1; VANBENDEGEM JP, UNPUB STRICT YET RIC; WRIGHT C, 1985, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V59, P118","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/103.411.337",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","NY276","WOS:A1994NY27600004",,,,,"2018-01-02",346.0,"boolosg dartnallt diamondc dowdenbh fraenkelaa hilbertd kripkesaulaaron laudenl lewisd meyerrk meyerr priestg priestg priestg priestg putnamh vanbendegemjp wrightc putnamh","cluster_3"
-0.5449307838380837,-0.5425337955524172,20.0,15.0,15.0,0.0,0.0,1994.0,103.0,410.0,131.0,146.0,16.0,"J","MATTHEWS, RJ",,,,"MATTHEWS, RJ",,,"THE MEASURE OF MIND","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"UNIV BIELEFELD,CTR INTERDISCIPLINARY RES,MIND & BRAIN RES GRP,W-4800 BIELEFELD,GERMANY","MATTHEWS, RJ (reprint author), RUTGERS STATE UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,NEW BRUNSWICK,NJ 08903, USA.",,,,,,"Churchland P., 1979, SCI REALISM PLASTICI; CRANE T, 1990, ANALYSIS, V50, P224, DOI 10.2307/3328258 ; DAVIDSON D, 1989, MIND D DAVIDSON, P3; Dennett D. C., 1987, INTENTIONAL STANCE; EGAN F, 1991, CAN J PHILOS, V21, P379; FIELD H, 1980, READINGS PHILOS PSYC; Fodor J., 1990, THEORY CONTENT OTHER; Fodor J., 1987, PSYCHOSEMANTICS; Fodor J. A., 1975, LANGUAGE THOUGHT; JOHNSONLAIRD PN, 1989, F COGNITIVE SCI; KRANTZ DH, 1971, F MEASUREMENT, V1; Kripke S., 1979, MEANING USE, P239; Loar B, 1988, CONTENTS THOUGHT; MATTHEWS R, 1991, MEANING MIND FODOR H; PERNER J., 1991, UNDERSTANDING REPRES; PERRY J, 1979, NOUS, V13, P3, DOI 10.2307/2214792 ; RECANATI F, 1993, DIRECT REFERENCE MEA; Richard M., 1990, PROPOSITIONAL ATTITU; Stalnaker Robert C., 1984, INQUIRY; Suppes P., 1967, HDB MATH PSYCHOL","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/103.410.131",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","NH976","WOS:A1994NH97600002",,,,,"2018-01-02",347.0,"cranet davidsond dennettdc eganf fieldh fodorj fodorj fodorja johnsonlairdpn krantzdh kripkes loarb matthewsr pernerj perryj recanatif richardm stalnakerrobertc suppesp churchlandp","cluster_0"
0.019792334882757175,0.02211149116017161,11.0,15.0,15.0,0.0,0.0,1984.0,93.0,372.0,491.0,500.0,10.0,"J","HARDIN, CL",,,,"HARDIN, CL",,,"ARE SCIENTIFIC OBJECTS COLORED","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"HARDIN, CL (reprint author), SYRACUSE UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,SYRACUSE,NY 13210, USA.",,,,,,"BECK J, 1972, SURFACE COLOR PERCEP; BORNSTEIN MH, 1976, J EXP PSYCHOL HUMAN, V2, P115, DOI 10.1037/0096-1523.2.1.115; BUCHSBAUM G, 1980, J FRANKLIN I, V310, P2; Campbell Keith, 1969, CONT PHILOS AUSTR, P132; HARDIN CL, 1983, J PHILOS DEC; Hurvich L. M., 1981, COLOR VISION; NASSAU K, 1980, SCI AM OCT; ROHRLICH F, 1983, PHILOS SCI DEC; ROSCH EH, 1973, COGNITIVE PSYCHOL, V4, P328, DOI 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0 ; SHEPPARD JJ, 1968, HUMAN COLOR PERCEPTI; WASSERMAN GS, 1978, COLOR VISION HIST IN","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","TQ518","WOS:A1984TQ51800002",,,,,"2018-01-02",348.0,"bornsteinmh buchsbaumg campbellkeith hardincl hurvichlm nassauk rohrlichf roscheh sheppardjj wassermangs beckj","cluster_0"
0.10558170427591794,0.26944677205789014,18.0,15.0,15.0,0.0,1.0,1983.0,92.0,368.0,499.0,518.0,20.0,"J","KEKES, J",,,,"KEKES, J",,,"CONSTANCY AND PURITY + INDIVIDUAL INTEGRITY","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"KEKES, J (reprint author), SUNY ALBANY,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,ALBANY,NY 12222, USA.",,,,,,"Aristotle, NICOMACHEAN ETHICS; *BIBLE, JAMES, V4; COOPER JM, 1975, REASON HUMAN GOOD 3; DENT NJH, 1980, MIND, V89, P418; FALK WD, 1968, ETHICS, P374; GOMBRICH EHJ, 1979, IDEALS IDOLS ESSAYS; HAMPSHIRE S, 1972, FREEDOM MIND; HARDIE WFR, 1980, ARISTOTLES ETHICAL T, pCH2; JAMES H, GOLDEN BOWL; KIERKEGAARD S, PURITY HEART IS WILL; Macintyre Alasdair, 1981, AFTER VIRTUE; MALCOLM N, 1958, L WITTGENSTEIN MEMOI, P80; MONTAIGNE, COMPLETE ESSAYS; Nagel T., 1970, POSSIBILITY ALTRUISM; PLUTARCH, ALEXANDER; SARTRE JP, BEING AND NOTHINGNES; Trilling Lionel, 1971, SINCERITY AUTHENTICI; WALKER ADM, 1978, MIND, V87, P481","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","RL245","WOS:A1983RL24500002",,,,,"2018-01-02",350.0,"bible cooperjm dentnjh falkwd gombrichehj hampshires hardiewfr jamesh kierkegaards macintyrealasdair malcolmn montaigne nagelt plutarch sartrejp trillinglionel walkeradm aristotle","cluster_6"
4.888129304297476E-4,0.03054130433797353,2.0,15.0,15.0,0.0,2.0,1982.0,91.0,364.0,501.0,523.0,23.0,"J","SCHLESINGER, GN",,,,"SCHLESINGER, GN",,,"HOW TIME FLIES","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"SCHLESINGER, GN (reprint author), UNIV N CAROLINA,CHAPEL HILL,NC 27514, USA.",,,,,,"Smart JJC, 1980, TIME CAUSE; ZWART PJ, 1972, SYNTHESE, P137","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","PM109","WOS:A1982PM10900002",,,,,"2018-01-02",351.0,"zwartpj smartjjc","cluster_0"
-0.04032111885777768,-0.05520821433916056,4.0,15.0,15.0,1.0,1.0,1981.0,90.0,357.0,99.0,101.0,3.0,"J","CHURCHLAND, PS",,,,"CHURCHLAND, PS",,,"IS DETERMINISM SELF-REFUTING","MIND",,,"English","Note",,,,,,,,,,"CHURCHLAND, PS (reprint author), UNIV MANITOBA,WINNIPEG R3T 2N2,MANITOBA,CANADA.",,,,,,"Dennett D. C., 1978, BRAINSTORMS; Eccles John C, 1976, CONSCIOUSNESS BRAIN, P101; Fodor J. A., 1975, LANGUAGE THOUGHT; Popper K., 1977, SELF ITS BRAIN","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","KZ154","WOS:A1981KZ15400007",,,,,"2018-01-02",352.0,"ecclesjohnc fodorja popperk dennettdc","cluster_0"
0.06599599861319447,0.04281558438750047,27.0,15.0,15.0,0.0,0.0,1969.0,78.0,311.0,393.0,407.0,15.0,"J","MOLINE, J",,,,"MOLINE, J",,,"ARISTOTLE, EUBULIDES AND SORITES","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"UNIV WISCONSIN,MADISON,WI",,,,,,,"ARISTOTLE, 1955, SOPHISTIC REFUTATION; ARISTOTLE, 1945, SOPHISTIC REFUTATION; ARISTOTLE, NICOMACHEAN ETHICS, V2, P15; ARISTOTLE, 1962, CATEGORIES, pB5; ARISTOTLE, 1534, OPERA OMNIA; ASPASIUS, 1889, COMMENTARIA ARISTOTE, V19, P56; BETH E, 1959, F MATHEMATICS, P22; Black M, 1963, DIALOGUE, V2, P1; BOCHENSKI I, 1961, HISTORY FORMAL LOGIC, P105; CICERO, ACADEMIC QUESTIONS, V2, P49; CICERO, FINIBUS BONORUM, V4, P50; CICERO MT, 1853, ACADEMIC QUESTIONS, P84; EMPIRICUS S, OUTLINES PYRRHONISM, V3, P80; EMPIRICUS S, ADVERSUS MATHEMATICO, V7, P13; FRITZ KV, 1855, GESCHICHTE LOGIK; FRITZ KV, 1931, REALENCYCLOPAEDIA S5, P710; GERCKE A, 1931, REALENCYCLOPAEDIA CL; GOMPERZ T, 1905, GREEK THINKERS, V2, P189; HEYLBUT G, 1892, ETHICA NICOMACHEA CO, V20, P140; HORACE, EPISTULAE; KNEALE W, 1962, DEV LOGIC, P114; KNEALE W, 1961, HISTORY FORMAL LOGIC; LAERTIUS D, VITAE PHILOSOPHORUM, V2, P108; NATORP P, 1931, REALENCYCLOPAEDIA S5; PRANTL C, 1855, GESCHICHTE LOGIK, P54; ZELLER E, 1931, OUTLINES HISTORY GRE, P107; 1853, ACADEMIC QUESTIONS, P46","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","Y5178","WOS:A1969Y517800005",,,,,"2018-01-02",353.0,"aristotle aristotle aristotle aristotle aspasius bethe blackm bochenskii cicero cicero ciceromt empiricuss empiricuss fritzkv fritzkv gerckea gomperzt heylbutg horace knealew knealew laertiusd natorpp prantlc zellere aristotle","cluster_4"
0.02436633563205884,0.03639475118469535,1.0,15.0,15.0,0.0,0.0,1967.0,76.0,301.0,83.0,91.0,9.0,"J","URMSON, JO",,,,"URMSON, JO",,,"MEMORY AND IMAGINATION","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"UNIV OXFORD,OXFORD,ENGLAND",,,,,,,"HUME, TREATISE HUMAN NAT 1","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","ZA894","WOS:A1967ZA89400007",,,,,"2018-01-02",354.0,"hume","cluster_0"
-0.04610430800793829,0.11380955203666222,2.0,15.0,15.0,0.0,1.0,1966.0,75.0,298.0,180.0,192.0,13.0,"J","OLDENQUIST, A",,,,"OLDENQUIST, A",,,"RULES AND CONSEQUENCES","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"OHIO STATE UNIV,COLUMBUS,OH",,,,,,,"HARE RM, 1952, LANGUAGE MORALS, pCH4; SMART JJC, 1956, PHILOSOPHICAL QUART, V6, P354","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","ZE549","WOS:A1966ZE54900002",,,,,"2018-01-02",355.0,"smartjjc harerm","cluster_6"
0.017191412820996045,0.037810111651829216,3.0,15.0,16.0,0.0,1.0,1958.0,67.0,267.0,305.0,316.0,12.0,"J","HARSANYI, JC",,,,"HARSANYI, JC",,,"ETHICS IN TERMS OF HYPOTHETICAL IMPERATIVES","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"FINDLAY JN, 1954, MIND APR, P145; FIRTH R, 1952, PHILOS PHENOMENOLOGI, P317; KNEALE W, 1950, PHILOSOPHY APR, P149","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","CCP45","WOS:A1958CCP4500002",,,,,"2018-01-02",358.0,"firthr knealew findlayjn","cluster_5"
-0.7239848800429446,-0.6539083295498176,35.0,14.0,14.0,0.0,2.0,2011.0,120.0,479.0,587.0,635.0,49.0,"J","Chalmers, DJ",,,,"Chalmers, David J.",,,"Frege's Puzzle and the Objects of Credence","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"BELIEF","The objects of credence are the entities to which credences are assigned for the purposes of a successful theory of credence. I use cases akin to Frege's puzzle to argue against referentialism about credence: the view that objects of credence are determined by the objects and properties at which one's credence is directed. I go on to develop a non-referential account of the objects of credence in terms of sets of epistemically possible scenarios.","Australian Natl Univ, Canberra, ACT, Australia; NYU, New York, NY 10003 USA","Chalmers, DJ (reprint author), Australian Natl Univ, Canberra, ACT, Australia.","chalmers@anu.edu.au",,,,,"Arntzenius F, 2003, J PHILOS, V100, P356, DOI 10.5840/jphil2003100729 ; Austin David, 1990, WHATS MEANING THIS; Bjerring Jens Christian, 2010, THESIS AUSTR NATL U; Braun D, 2000, NOUS, V34, P203, DOI 10.1111/0029-4624.00208 ; Chalmers David, 2006, FDN 2 DIMENSIONAL SE, P55; CHALMERS D, CONSTRUCTIN IN PRESS; Chalmers DJ, 2001, PHILOS REV, V110, P315, DOI 10.2307/2693648; Chalmers David J, 2011, NOUS, V45; Chalmers David J, 2009, 2 DIMENSIONAL ARGUME, P141; Chalmers David J., 2010, CHARACTER CONSCIOUSN; Chalmers D., 2011, NATURE EPISTEMIC SPA, P60; Christensen David, 2008, OXFORD STUDIES EPIST, V2, P3; EARMAN J, 1983, TESTING SCI THEORIES; Earman J., 1992, BAYES BUST CRITICAL; Egan A, 2011, EPISTEMIC MODALITY; Elga A, 2000, ANALYSIS, V60, P143, DOI 10.1111/1467-8284.00215 ; Garber Daniel, 1983, OLD EVIDENCE LOGICAL, P99; Garcia-Carpintero M., 2006, 2 DIMENSIONAL SEMANT; Glymour C., 1980, THEORY EVIDENCE; Hajek A, 2003, SYNTHESE, V137, P273, DOI 10.1023/B:SYNT.0000004904.91112.16 ; Hitchcock C, 2004, SYNTHESE, V139, P405, DOI 10.1023/B:SYNT.0000024889.29125.c0 ; Jeffrey Richard C., 1980, STUDIES INDUCTIVE LO, VII; Joyce J. M., 1999, FDN CAUSAL DECISION; LEWIS D, 1979, PHILOS REV, V88, P513, DOI 10.2307/2184843 ; Lewis David, 1980, STUDIES INDUCTIVE LO, P263; McLaughlin B. P., 2009, OXFORD HDB PHILOS MI; Popper K., 1959, LOGIC SCI DISCOVERY; Putnam H., 1975, MIND LANGUAGE REALIT; Putnam H., 1975, MIND LANGUAGE REALIT, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CB09780511625251, 10.1017/CBO9780511625251]; Renyi A., 1955, ACTA MATH ACAD SCI H, V6, P285; Salmon N, 1986, FREGES PUZZLE; Stalnaker R, 2008, OUR KNOWLEDGE INTERN; STALNAKER RC, 1981, SYNTHESE, V49, P129; Stalnaker Robert C., 1984, INQUIRY; Titelbaum MG, 2008, PHILOS REV, V117, P555, DOI 10.1215/00318108-2008-016","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423","1460-2113",,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzr046",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","883AG","WOS:000299604400001",,,,,"2018-01-02",360.0,"austindavid bjerringjenschristian braund chalmersdavid chalmersd chalmersdj chalmersdavidj chalmersdavidj chalmersdavidj chalmersd christensendavid earmanj earmanj egana elgaa garberdaniel garciacarpinterom glymourc hajeka hitchcockc jeffreyrichardc joycejm lewisd lewisdavid mclaughlinbp popperk putnamh putnamh renyia salmonn stalnakerr stalnakerrc stalnakerrobertc titelbaummg arntzeniusf","cluster_3"
-0.4549880023883598,-0.47128900000512436,28.0,14.0,14.0,1.0,2.0,2010.0,119.0,473.0,43.0,81.0,39.0,"J","Millikan, RG",,,,"Millikan, Ruth Garrett",,,"On Knowing the Meaning; With a Coda on Swampman","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"I give an analysis of how empirical terms do their work in communication and the gathering of knowledge that is fully externalist and that covers the full range of empirical terms. It rests on claims about ontology. A result is that armchair analysis fails as a tool for examining meanings of 'basic' empirical terms because their meanings are not determined by common methods or criteria of application passed from old to new users, by conventionally determined 'intensions'. Nor do methods of application used by individual speakers constitute definitive reference-determining intensions for their idiolect terms or associated concepts. Conventional intensions of non-basic empirical terms ultimately rest on basic empirical concepts, so no empirical meaning is found merely 'in the head'. I discuss the nature of lexical definition, why empirical meanings cannot ultimately be modelled as functions from possible worlds to extensions, and traps into which armchair analysis of meaning can lead us. A coda explains how 'Swamprnan' examples, as used against teleosemantic theories of content, illustrate such traps.","Univ Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 USA","Millikan, RG (reprint author), Univ Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 USA.","ruth.Millikan@uconn.edu",,,,,"Antony L, 1996, MIND LANG, V11, P70, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0017.1996.tb00030.x ; Ayer Alfred Jules, 1936, LANGUAGE TRUTH LOGIC; Bloom P., 2000, CHILDREN LEARN MEANI; Boer S.E., 1986, KNOWING WHO; CHOMSKY N, 1995, MIND, V104, P1, DOI 10.1093/mind/104.413.1 ; Davidson D, 2001, P ADDRESSES AM PHILO, DOI DOI 10.2307/3131782; Fodor J. A., 1998, CONCEPTS COGNITIVE S; GHISELIN MT, 1981, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V4, P269, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X00008852 ; GHISELIN MT, 1974, SYST ZOOL, V23, P536, DOI 10.2307/2412471; Gunderson K., 1975, LANGUAGE MIND KNOWLE, VVII; Gupta A., 2008, STANFORD ENCY PHILOS; Hardin C. L., 1997, COLOR CATEGORIES THO; HULL DL, 1978, PHILOS SCI, V45, P335, DOI 10.1086/288811 ; JOHNSTON M, 1987, J PHILOS, V84, P59, DOI 10.2307/2026626 ; Papineau D., 2006, TELEOSEMANTICS; Millikan R, 2000, CLEAR CONFUSED IDEAS; MILLIKAN Ruth, 2005, LANGUAGE BIOL MODEL; Millikan RG, 2004, JEAN NICOD LECT, P1; Millikan RG, 1999, PHILOS STUD, V95, P45, DOI 10.1023/A:1004532016219 ; Millikan RG, 1996, MIND LANG, V11, P103, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0017.1996.tb00035.x ; Millikan R. G., 1984, LANGUAGE THOUGHT OTH; Nussbaum Charles, 2007, MUSICAL REPRESENTATI; OHEAR A, 2001, PHILOS NEW MILLENNIU; Putnam H., 1973, J PHILOS, V70, P699, DOI DOI 10.2307/2025079; ROSS D, 2000, DENNETTS PHILOS COMP; SAVAGE CW, 1989, REREADING RUSSELL ES, V12; TANNEY J, 1969, PHILOS PHENOMENOLOGI, V69, P173; Wittgenstein L., 1953, PHILOS INVESTIGATION","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzp157",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","605BP","WOS:000278322600002",,,,,"2018-01-02",361.0,"ayeralfredjules bloomp boerse chomskyn davidsond fodorja ghiselinmt ghiselinmt gundersonk guptaa hardincl hulldl johnstonm papineaud millikanr millikanruth millikanrg millikanrg millikanrg millikanrg nussbaumcharles oheara putnamh rossd savagecw tanneyj wittgensteinl antonyl","cluster_0"
-0.668242001139664,-0.5663509414941956,30.0,14.0,14.0,0.0,0.0,2009.0,118.0,471.0,555.0,581.0,27.0,"J","Horsten, L",,,,"Horsten, Leon",,,"Levity","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"TRUTH; DEFLATIONISM","In this article, the prospects of deflationism about the concept of truth are investigated. A new version of deflationism, called inferential deflationism, is articulated and defended. It is argued that it avoids the pitfalls of earlier deflationist views such as Horwich's minimalist theory of truth and Field's version of deflationism.","[Horsten, Leon] Univ Bristol, Dept Philosophy, Bristol BS8 1TB, Avon, England; [Horsten, Leon] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Inst Philosophy, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium","Horsten, L (reprint author), Univ Bristol, Dept Philosophy, 9 Woodland Rd, Bristol BS8 1TB, Avon, England.","Leon.Horsten@bristol.ac.uk",,,,,"Blackburn S., 1999, TRUTH; BRANDOM R, 2000, ARTICULATING REASONS; Brandom R., 1994, MAKING IT EXPLICIT; Carnap Rudolf, 1934, LOGISCHE SYNTAX SPRA; DAVIDSON D, 1990, J PHILOS, V87, P279, DOI 10.2307/2026863 ; Evans Gareth, 1976, TRUTH MEANING ESSAYS; FIELD H, 1992, PHILOS SCI, V59, P321, DOI 10.1086/289671 ; Field H, 1999, J PHILOS, V96, P533, DOI 10.2307/2564613 ; Field H., 2008, SAVING TRUTH PARADOX; Fitch R., 1963, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V28, P135; Halbach V, 2006, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V71, P677, DOI 10.2178/jsl/1146620166; Halbach V, 2001, SYNTHESE, V126, P167, DOI 10.1023/A:1005275222332 ; HALBACH V, 1996, AXIOMATISCHE WAHRHEI; Horsten Leon, 2002, PRINCIPLES TRUTH; HINTIKKA J, 1978, ESSAYS MATH PHILOS L; Horwich P., 1999, MEANING; Horwich P., 1998, TRUTH; Ketland J, 1999, MIND, V108, P69, DOI 10.1093/mind/108.429.69 ; KRIPKE S, 1975, J PHILOS, V72, P690, DOI 10.2307/2024634 ; KRIPKE S., 1980, NAMING NECESSITY; LEE O, 1936, PHILOS ESSAYS ALFRED; Martin R.L., 1984, RECENT ESSAYS TRUTH; MCGEE V, 1992, J PHILOS LOGIC, V21, P235; Musil Robert, 1978, MANN OHNE EIGENSCHAF, V1; Quine W., 1986, PHILOS LOGIC; Quine W. V. O., 1966, WAYS PARADOX OTHER E; Shapiro S, 1998, J PHILOS, V95, P493, DOI 10.2307/2564719 ; Soames S., 1999, UNDERSTANDING TRUTH; Tarski Alfred, 1944, PHILOS PHENOMENOLOGI, V4, P341; Williamson T., 2000, KNOWLEDGE ITS LIMITS","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzp096",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","518UE","WOS:000271719000001",,"gold",,,"2018-01-02",362.0,"brandomr brandomr carnaprudolf davidsond evansgareth fieldh fieldh fieldh fitchr halbachv halbachv halbachv horstenleon hintikkaj horwichp horwichp ketlandj kripkes kripkes leeo martinrl mcgeev musilrobert quinew quinewvo shapiros soamess tarskialfred williamsont blackburns","cluster_0"
0.01746448478465597,0.022098413201530442,4.0,14.0,14.0,0.0,1.0,2007.0,116.0,463.0,597.0,602.0,6.0,"J","Peijnenburg, J",,,,"Peijnenburg, Jeanne",,,"Infinitism regained","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"Consider the following process of epistemic justification: proposition E-0 is made probable by El, which in turn is made probable by E-2, which is made probable by E-3, and so on. Can this process go on indefinitely? Foundationalists, coherentists, and sceptics claim that it cannot. I argue that it can: there are many infinite regresses of probabilistic reasoning that can be completed. This leads to a new form of epistemic infinitism.","Univ Groningen, Fac Philosophy, NL-9712 GL Groningen, Netherlands","Peijnenburg, J (reprint author), Univ Groningen, Fac Philosophy, Oude Boteringestr 52, NL-9712 GL Groningen, Netherlands.","Jeanne.Peijnenburg@rug.nl",,,,,"FUMERTON R, 2006, STANFORD ENCY PHILOS; Fumerton Richard, 2004, PHILOS ISSUES, V14, P149; FUMERTON R, 2006, EPISTOMOLOGY; Klein P, 1998, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V58, P919, DOI 10.2307/2653735","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzm597",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","205FB","WOS:000249098300004",,,,,"2018-01-02",363.0,"fumertonrichard fumertonr kleinp fumertonr","cluster_3"
-0.5371823066388789,-0.4585676978592161,25.0,14.0,14.0,0.0,0.0,2006.0,115.0,459.0,659.0,693.0,35.0,"J","Zalta, EN",,,,"Zalta, Edward N.",,,"Essence and modality","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"OBJECTS; PARADOX; FREGE; LOGIC","Some recently-proposed counterexamples to the traditional definition of essential property do not require a separate logic of essence. Instead, the examples can be analysed in terms of the logic and theory of abstract objects. This theory distinguishes between abstract and ordinary objects, and provides a general analysis of the essential properties of both kinds of object. The claim 'x has F necessarily' becomes ambiguous in the case of abstract objects, and in the case of ordinary objects there are various ways to make the definition of 'F is essential to x' more fine-grained. Consequently, the traditional definition of essential property for abstract objects in terms of modal notions is not correct, and for ordinary objects the relationship between essential properties and modality, once properly understood, addresses the counterexample.","Stanford Univ, Ctr Study Language & Informat, Stanford, CA 94305 USA","Zalta, EN (reprint author), Stanford Univ, Ctr Study Language & Informat, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.","zalta@stanford.edu",,,,,"Anderson DJ, 2004, J PHILOS LOGIC, V33, P1, DOI 10.1023/B:LOGI.0000019236.64896.fd ; CLARK R, 1978, NOUS, V12, P181, DOI 10.2307/2214691 ; FINE K, 1995, J PHILOS LOGIC, V24, P241, DOI 10.1007/BF01344203 ; Fine K, 2000, J PHILOS LOGIC, V29, P543, DOI 10.1023/A:1026591900038 ; Fine K., 1994, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V8, P1, DOI DOI 10.2307/2214160; FINE K, 1994, SENSES ESSENCE, P53; FREGE G, 2003, GRUNDGESETZE ARITHME; Lewis D., 1986, PLURALITY WORLDS; Linsky B, 1996, PHILOS STUD, V84, P283, DOI 10.1007/BF00354491 ; Linsky B, 2006, B SYMB LOG, V12, P60, DOI 10.2178/bsl/1140640944 ; Linsky B, 1995, J PHILOS, V92, P525, DOI 10.2307/2940786 ; Linsky B., 1994, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, P431; Mally E., 1912, GEGENSTANDSTHEORETIS; RAPAPORT WJ, 1978, NOUS, V12, P153, DOI 10.2307/2214690 ; Russel B, 1905, MIND, V14, P479, DOI DOI 10.1093/MIND/XIV.4.479; SINNOTTARMSTRON.W, 1994, MODALITY MORALITY BE; Williamson T., 1999, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V73, P181; Williamson T., 1998, ERKENNTNIS, V48, P257; ZALTA Edward, 1983, ABSTRACT OBJECTS INT; Zalta E, 2000, PHILOSOPHIEGESCHICHT, V3, P137; Zalta Edward, 1988, INTENSIONAL LOGIC ME; Zalta EN, 2000, ERKENNTNIS, V53, P219, DOI 10.1023/A:1005614102033 ; ZALTA EN, 1988, J PHILOS, V85, P57, DOI 10.2307/2026992 ; ZALTA EN, 1993, J PHILOS LOGIC, V22, P385, DOI 10.1007/BF01052533 ; Zalta EN, 1999, J PHILOS LOGIC, V28, P619","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzl659",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","073RX","WOS:000239761400006",,,,,"2018-01-02",364.0,"clarkr finek finek finek finek fregeg lewisd linskyb linskyb linskyb linskyb mallye rapaportwj russelb sinnottarmstronw williamsont williamsont zaltaedward zaltae zaltaedward zaltaen zaltaen zaltaen zaltaen andersondj","cluster_3"
-0.06066808666034269,-0.060024575474879965,8.0,14.0,14.0,0.0,0.0,2005.0,114.0,453.0,75.0,88.0,14.0,"J","Ketland, J",,,,"Ketland, J",,,"Deflationism and the Godel phenomena: Reply to Tennant","MIND",,,"English","Editorial Material",,,,,,,"ARGUMENT; TRUTH",,"Univ Edinburgh, Sch Philosophy Psychol & Language Sci, Edinburgh EH8 9JX, Midlothian, Scotland","Ketland, J (reprint author), Univ Edinburgh, Sch Philosophy Psychol & Language Sci, George Sq, Edinburgh EH8 9JX, Midlothian, Scotland.","jeffrey.ketland@ed.ac.uk",,,,,"FEFERMAN S, 1991, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V46, P1; Field H, 1999, J PHILOS, V96, P533, DOI 10.2307/2564613 ; Godel K., 1931, MONATSHEFTE MATH PHY, V38, P173, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01700692; Ketland J, 1999, MIND, V108, P69, DOI 10.1093/mind/108.429.69 ; Shapiro S, 1998, J PHILOS, V95, P493, DOI 10.2307/2564719 ; TARSKI Alfred, 1935, STUDIA PHILOS, V1, P261; Tennant N, 2002, MIND, V111, P551, DOI 10.1093/mind/111.443.551 ; von Neumann J., 1966, THEORY SELF REPROD A","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fz075",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","890OA","WOS:000226519500005",,,,,"2018-01-02",365.0,"fieldh godelk ketlandj shapiros tarskialfred tennantn vonneumannj fefermans","cluster_0"
-0.23344218381102075,-0.2100173351034487,12.0,14.0,14.0,0.0,1.0,2002.0,111.0,442.0,225.0,247.0,23.0,"J","Cook, RT",,,,"Cook, RT",,,"Vagueness and mathematical precision","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,"One of the main reasons for providing formal semantics for languages is that the mathematical precision afforded by such semantics allows us to study and manipulate the formalization much more easily than if we were to study the relevant natural languages directly. Michael Tye and R.M. Sainsbury have argued that traditional set-theoretic semantics for vague languages are all but useless, however, since this mathematical precision eliminates the very phenomenon (vagueness) that we are trying to capture. Here we meet this objection by viewing formalization as a process of building models, not providing descriptions. When we are constructing models, as opposed to accurate descriptions, we often include in the model extra 'machinery' of some sort in order to facilitate our manipulation of the model. In other words, while some parts of a model accurately represent actual aspects of the phenomenon being modelled, other parts might be merely artefacts of the particular model. With this distinction in place, the criticisms of Sainsbury and Tye are easily dealt with--the precision of the semantics is artefactual and does not represent are real precision in vague discourse. Although this solution to this problem is independent of any particular semantics, a detailed account of how we would distinguish between representor and artefact within Dorothy Edgington's degree-theoretic semantics is presented.","Univ St Andrews, Dept Logic & Metaphysics, St Andrews KY16 9AJ, Fife, Scotland","Cook, RT (reprint author), Univ St Andrews, Dept Logic & Metaphysics, St Andrews KY16 9AJ, Fife, Scotland.",,,,,,"Edgington D., 1997, VAGUENESS READER, P294; Evans Gareth, 1976, TRUTH MEANING ESSAYS; Fine K., 1997, VAGUENESS READER, P119; Keefe Rosanna, 1997, VAGUENESS READER; MACHINA K, 1997, VAGUENESS READER, P174; Sainsbury R., 1997, VAGUENESS READER, P251; SCHIRN M, 1998, PHILOS MATH TODAY P; Shapiro S., 1998, PHILOS MATH TODAY, P131; Tye Michael, 1994, SO J PHILOS, V33, P1; Tye Michael, 1997, VAGUENESS READER, P281; Williamson T., 1994, VAGUENESS; WRIGHT C, 1997, VAGUENESS READER, P151","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/111.442.225",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","545WG","WOS:000175240100002",,,,,"2018-01-02",366.0,"evansgareth finek keeferosanna machinak sainsburyr schirnm shapiros tyemichael tyemichael williamsont wrightc edgingtond","cluster_0"
-0.7243389972367341,-0.5418960447891978,25.0,14.0,14.0,0.0,1.0,2000.0,109.0,434.0,255.0,273.0,19.0,"J","Rodriguez-Pereyra, G",,,,"Rodriguez-Pereyra, G",,,"What is the problem of universals?","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"OSTRICH NOMINALISM","In this article I address the Problem of Universals by answering questions about what facts a solution to the Problem of Universals should explain and how the explanation should go. I argue that a solution to the Problem of Universals explains the facts the Problem of Universals is about by giving the truthmakers (as opposed to the conceptual content and the ontological commitments) of the sentences stating those facts. I argue that the sentences stating the relevant facts are those like 'a has the property F,' that is, sentences stating that a particular has a certain property. Finally, I show how answering these questions in this way transforms the Problem of Universals, traditionally conceived as the One over Many, that is, the problem of explaining how different particulars can have the same properties, into the Many over One, that is, the problem of explaining how the same particular can have different properties. The Problem of Universals is the problem of the Many over One.","Univ Cambridge Churchhill Coll, Cambridge CB3 0DS, England","Rodriguez-Pereyra, G (reprint author), Univ Cambridge Churchhill Coll, Cambridge CB3 0DS, England.",,,,,,"Armstrong D, 1978, UNIVERSALS SCI REALI; ARMSTRONG DM, 1989, COMINATORIAL THEORY; Armstrong D.M., 1997, WORLD STATES AFFAIRS; Bigelow J., 1988, REALITY NUMBERS; Campbell K., 1981, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V6, p[477, 125]; Campbell K., 1990, ABSTRACT PARTICULARS; DEVITT M, 1980, PAC PHILOS QUART, V61, P433; Devitt M., 1991, REALISM TRUTH; FOX JF, 1987, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V65, P188, DOI 10.1080/00048408712342871 ; Hochberg H., 1992, LANGUAGE TRUTH ONTOL, P87; Keefe Rosann, 1996, VAGUENESS READER; LEWIS D, 1983, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V61, P343, DOI 10.1080/00048408312341131 ; Lewis D., 1986, PLURALITY WORLDS; MARSH RC, 1994, B RUSSELL LOGIC KNOW; Mulligan Kevin, 1984, PHILOS PHENOMENOLOGI, V44, P278; NOZICK R, 1981, PHILOS EXPLANATIONS; OLIVER A, 1996, MIND, V105, P1, DOI 10.1093/mind/105.417.1 ; Olson KR, 1987, ESSAY FACTS; Read S, 2000, MIND, V109, P67, DOI 10.1093/mind/109.433.67 ; Rodriguez-Pereyra G, 1998, PHILOS QUART, V48, P513, DOI 10.1111/1467-9213.00119 ; RODRIGUEZPEREYA G, 2000, METAPHYSICS POST MET; RUSSELL B, 1919, MONIST, V29; RUSSELL B, 1918, MONIST, V28; Simons P., 1992, LANGUAGE TRUTH ONTOL, P157; VANCLEVE J, 1994, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V54, P577, DOI 10.2307/2108582","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/109.434.255",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","305CF","WOS:000086520700004",,,,,"2018-01-02",367.0,"armstrongdm armstrongdm bigelowj campbellk campbellk devittm devittm foxjf hochbergh keeferosann lewisd lewisd marshrc mulligankevin nozickr olivera olsonkr reads rodriguezpereyrag rodriguezpereyag russellb russellb simonsp vanclevej armstrongd","cluster_3"
-0.38490483646478296,-0.48098473800200636,36.0,14.0,14.0,0.0,0.0,1999.0,108.0,431.0,503.0,538.0,36.0,"J","Warmbrod, K",,,,"Warmbrod, K",,,"Logical constants","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"QUANTIFIERS",,"Univ Manitoba, Dept Philosophy, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada","Warmbrod, K (reprint author), Univ Manitoba, Dept Philosophy, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada.",,,,,,"BARWISE J, 1981, LINGUIST PHILOS, V4, P159, DOI 10.1007/BF00350139 ; BARWISE J, 1979, J PHILOS LOGIC, V8, P47; BOOLOS GS, 1975, J PHILOS, V72, P509, DOI 10.2307/2025179 ; Boolos G. S., 1989, COMPUTABILITY LOGIC; BROUWER LEJ, 1940, P 10TH INT C PHIL; Davidson D., 1967, LOGIC DECISION ACTIO; Dummett M. A. E., 1977, ELEMENTS INTUITIONIS; Etchemendy J, 1990, CONCEPT LOGICAL CONS; Fitting M., 1969, INTUITIONISTIC LOGIC; Forbes Graeme, 1985, METAPHYSICS MODALITY; Haack S., 1978, PHILOS LOGICS; HACKING I, 1979, J PHILOS, V76, P285, DOI 10.2307/2025471 ; Hanson WH, 1997, PHILOS REV, V106, P365, DOI 10.2307/2998398 ; HOSSACK KG, 1990, MIND, V99, P207; Kant Immanuel, CRITIQUE PURE REASON; Koslow A., 1992, STRUCTURALIST THEORY; LINDSTROM P, 1969, THEORIA, V35, P1; MACHOVER M, 1994, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V45, P1078, DOI 10.1093/bjps/45.4.1078 ; McKinsey J.C, 1948, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V13, P1, DOI 10.2307/2268135; Mendelson E, 1987, INTRO MATH LOGIC; Mostowski A., 1957, FUND MATH, V44, P12; PEACOCKE C, 1981, J PHILOS, V78, P168, DOI 10.2307/2025865 ; PEACOCKE C, 1976, J PHILOS, V73, P221, DOI 10.2307/2025420 ; Quine W. V., 1970, PHILOS LOGIC; QUINE WVO, 1953, MIND, V62; Russell B., 1919, INTRO MATH PHILOS; Ryle G., 1954, DILEMMAS; Sainsbury M, 1991, LOGICAL FORMS; SHER G, 1989, PAC PHILOS QUART, V70, P341; SHER G., 1991, BOUNDS LOGIC; Sher GY, 1996, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V61, P653, DOI 10.2307/2275681 ; Tarski A., 1986, HIST PHILOS LOGIC, V7, P143, DOI DOI 10.1080/01445348608837096.PUBLISHED; TARSKI A, 1936, PREZGLAD FUKIZIFUCZN, V39; Tharp L. H., 1975, SYNTHESE, V31, P1; WHEELER III S. C., 1972, NOUS, V6, P310; ZUCKER JI, 1978, J PHILOS LOGIC, V7, P517","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/108.431.503",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","221BA","WOS:000081703300003",,,,,"2018-01-02",368.0,"barwisej boolosgs boolosgs brouwerlej davidsond dummettmae etchemendyj fittingm forbesgraeme haacks hackingi hansonwh hossackkg kantimmanuel koslowa lindstromp machoverm mckinseyjc mendelsone mostowskia peacockec peacockec quinewv quinewvo russellb ryleg sainsburym sherg sherg shergy tarskia tarskia tharplh wheeleriiisc zuckerji barwisej","cluster_0"
-0.6622840437108496,-0.4063181458501463,19.0,14.0,14.0,0.0,0.0,1999.0,108.0,430.0,291.0,334.0,44.0,"J","McDermott, M",,,,"McDermott, M",,,"Counterfactuals and access points","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,"Univ Sydney, Sch Philos, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia","McDermott, M (reprint author), Univ Sydney, Sch Philos, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.",,,,,,"Adams E., 1975, LOGIC CONDITIONALS; ADAMS EW, 1970, FDN LANGUAGE, V6, P89; Adams E.W., 1965, INQUIRY, V8, P166; Anderson Alan Ross, 1951, ANALYSIS, V12, P35; BENNETT J, 1984, PHILOS REV, V93, P57, DOI 10.2307/2184413 ; Dudman V. H., 1984, AUSTR J LINGUISTICS, V4, P143; JACKSON F, 1979, PHILOS REV, V88, P565, DOI 10.2307/2184845 ; JACKSON F, 1977, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V55, P3, DOI 10.1080/00048407712341001 ; Lewis D., 1986, PHILOS PAPERS; Lewis D., 1973, COUNTERFACTUALS; Mackie J. L., 1973, TRUTH PROBABILITY PA; Mackie J., 1962, ANAL PHILOS, P66; McDermott M, 1995, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V46, P523, DOI 10.1093/bjps/46.4.523 ; MCDERMOTT M, 1996, PHILOS REV, V105, P1, DOI 10.2307/2185762 ; McDermott M, 1997, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V75, P396, DOI 10.1080/00048409712347981 ; MCDERMOTT M, IN PRESS PHILOS REV; Nute D., 1980, TOPICS CONDITIONAL L; POLLOCK JL, 1975, AM PHILOS QUART, V12, P51; SLOTE MA, 1978, PHILOS REV, V87, P3, DOI 10.2307/2184345","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/108.430.291",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","190AT","WOS:000079939900004",,,,,"2018-01-02",369.0,"adamsew adamsew andersonalanross bennettj dudmanvh jacksonf jacksonf lewisd lewisd mackiejl mackiej mcdermottm mcdermottm mcdermottm mcdermottm nuted pollockjl slotema adamse","cluster_3"
-1.5939604755622119,-1.3374905254216058,44.0,14.0,14.0,0.0,0.0,1997.0,106.0,423.0,521.0,574.0,54.0,"J","Peacocke, C",,,,"Peacocke, C",,,"Metaphysical necessity: Understanding, truth and epistemology","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"MODALISM",,,"Peacocke, C (reprint author), UNIV OXFORD MAGDALEN COLL,OXFORD OX1 4AU,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"Adams RM, 1974, NOUS, V8, P211; BOOLOS G, UNPROVABILITY CONSIS; CARNAP R, MEANING NECESSITY; Cole P., 1978, SYNTAX SEMANTICS; Davidson D., 1984, INQUIRIES TRUTH INTE, P3; DAVIES M, 1980, PHILOS STUD, V38, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF00354523 ; DAVIES M, 1975, THESIS U OXFORD; DAVIES MK, 1978, J PHILOS LOGIC, V7, P415; Evans Gareth, 1985, COLLECT PAPERS, P178; Fine K., 1994, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V8, P1, DOI DOI 10.2307/2214160; FORBES G, 1992, PHILOS STUD, V68, P57, DOI 10.1007/BF00354469 ; FORBES G, METAPHYSICS MODALITY; GOODMAN N, FACT FICTION FORECAS; GUPTA A, 1978, J PHILOS LOGIC, V7, P441; HIGGINBOTHAM J, IN PRESS LANGUAGE CO; HINTIKKA J, MODELS MODALITIES; HUGHES GE, INTRO MODAL LOGIC; HUMBERSTONE IL, 1981, J PHILOS LOGIC, V10, P313, DOI 10.1007/BF00293423 ; JACKSON F, 1977, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V55, P3, DOI 10.1080/00048407712341001 ; KAPLAN D, 1978, SYNTAX SEMANTICS, P221; Kripke S., NAMING NECESSITY; Kripke S., 1963, ACTA PHILOS FENN, V16, P83; LEIBNIZ G, NEW ESSAYS HUMAN UND; LEWIS D, 1970, J PHILOS, V67, P427, DOI 10.2307/2023861 ; Lewis David, PHILOS PAPERS; LEWIS D, PLURALITY WORLDS; Linsky L, 1971, REFERENCE MODALITY; MCGINN C, 1982, PHILOS QUART, V32, P97, DOI 10.2307/2960075 ; MELIA J, 1992, PHILOS STUD, V68, P35, DOI 10.1007/BF00354468 ; PEACOCKE C, 1992, MIND, V101, P793, DOI 10.1093/mind/101.404.793 ; PEACOCKE C, 1978, J PHILOS LOGIC, V7, P473; Peacocke Christopher, 1993, EUR J PHILOS, V1, P175; PEACOCKE C, STUDY CONCEPTS; PEACOCKE C, IN PRESS LANGUAGE CO; Peacocke C., 1987, P BRIT ACAD, V73, P153; PUTNAM H, MATH MATTER METHOD; Putnam Hilary, 1970, ESSAYS HONOR CG HEMP, P235; RESCHER N, 1970, ESSAYS HONOR CG HEMP; SALMON N, 1989, PHILOS REV, V98, P3, DOI 10.2307/2185369 ; SALMON N, REFERENCE ESSENCE; STALNAKER R, 1988, MIND, V97, P117; STALNAKER RC, 1976, NOUS, V10, P65, DOI 10.2307/2214477 ; Tarski A., LOGIC SEMANTICS META; WIGGINS D, SAMENESS SUBSTANCE","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/106.423.521",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","XH166","WOS:A1997XH16600007",,,,,"2018-01-02",370.0,"boolosg carnapr colep davidsond daviesm daviesm daviesmk evansgareth finek forbesg forbesg goodmann guptaa higginbothamj hintikkaj hughesge humberstoneil jacksonf kapland kripkes kripkes leibnizg lewisd lewisdavid lewisd linskyl mcginnc meliaj peacockec peacockec peacockechristopher peacockec peacockec peacockec putnamh putnamhilary reschern salmonn salmonn stalnakerr stalnakerrc tarskia wigginsd adamsrm","cluster_0"
-0.11215520301588593,-0.09447471543407039,4.0,14.0,14.0,0.0,0.0,1997.0,106.0,422.0,305.0,309.0,5.0,"J","Zimmerman, DW",,,,"Zimmerman, DW",,,"Distinct indiscernibles and the Bundle Theory","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"IDENTITY",,,"Zimmerman, DW (reprint author), UNIV NOTRE DAME,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,NOTRE DAME,IN 46556, USA.",,,,,,"ADAMS RM, 1979, J PHILOS, V76, P5, DOI 10.2307/2025812 ; Armstrong D. M., 1989, UNIVERSALS OPINIONAT; Black M., 1952, MIND, VLXI, P152; OLEARYHAWTHORNE J, 1995, ANALYSIS, V55, P191, DOI 10.2307/3328579","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/106.422.305",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","WR328","WOS:A1997WR32800005",,,,,"2018-01-02",371.0,"armstrongdm blackm olearyhawthornej adamsrm","cluster_3"
-1.1202993800653962,-1.005065363506778,44.0,14.0,14.0,0.0,0.0,1997.0,106.0,421.0,1.0,32.0,32.0,"J","Gauker, C",,,,"Gauker, C",,,"Domain of discourse + Against the expressive theory of linguistic communication","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"DEMONSTRATIONS",,,"Gauker, C (reprint author), UNIV CINCINNATI,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,CINCINNATI,OH 45221, USA.",,,,,,"BACH K, 1992, PHILOS STUD, V67, P295, DOI 10.1007/BF00354541 ; BACH K, 1992, ANALYSIS, V52, P140, DOI 10.2307/3328374 ; Bach K., 1994, MIND LANG, V9, P124, DOI [10.1111/j.1468-0017.1994.tb00220.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1468-0017.1994.TB00220.X]; BACH K, THOUGHT REFERENCE; BENNETT J, LINGUISTIC BEHAVIOR; CHIERCHIA G, DYNAMICS MEANING ANA; Cole P, 1975, SYNTAX SEMANTICS; Cole Peter, 1981, RADICAL PRAGMATICS; DAVIDSON D, 1990, J PHILOS, V87, P279, DOI 10.2307/2026863 ; DAVIDSON D, 1972, SEMANTICS NATURAL LA; EVANS G, VARIETIES REFERENCE; FODOR JA, LANGUAGE THOUGHT; FODOR JA, PSYCHOSEMANTICS; FREGE G, 1956, MIND, V65, P289, DOI 10.1093/mind/65.1.289 ; Frege Gottlob, 1960, TRANSLATIONS PHILOS, P56; French P. A., 1979, CONT PERSPECTIVES PH; GEACH P, 1960, TRANSLATIONS WRITING; Grice H., 1989, STUDIES WAYS WORDS; GRICE HP, 1969, PHILOS REV, V78, P147, DOI 10.2307/2184179 ; GRICE HP, 1957, PHILOS REV, V66, P377, DOI 10.2307/2182440 ; Grice H. P., 1975, SYNTAX SEMANTICS, VIII, P41, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0022226700005296; GRICE HP, F LANGUAGE; GRICE H.P., 1982, MUTUAL KNOWLEDGE, p[223, 283]; Grice H. P, 1981, RADICAL PRAGMATICS, P183; HALE R, IN PRESS COMPANION P; HEIM I, SEMANTICS DEFINITE I; JACKENDOFF R, PATTERNS MIND LANGUA; Kaplan David, 1979, CONT PERSPECTIVES PH, P383; LEWIS D, 1979, J PHILOS LOGIC, V8, P339; LEWIS D, CONVENTION PHILOS ST; Perry J., 1986, PROBLEM ESSENTIAL IN, P205; PERRY J, IN PRESS COMPANION P; QUINE WVO, WORD OBJECT; RECANATI FRANCOIS, 1989, MIND LANG, V4, P294; RECANATI F, DIRECT REFERENCE LAN; REIMER M, 1991, ANALYSIS, V51, P177, DOI 10.2307/3328751 ; REIMER M, 1991, PHILOS STUD, V63, P187, DOI 10.1007/BF00381687 ; SCHIFFER S, MEANING; Smith N.V., 1982, MUTUAL KNOWLEDGE; SPERBER D, RELEVANCE COMMUNICAT; Stalnaker R., 1972, SEMANTICS NATURAL LA, P380; STALNAKER R, INQUIRY; VANBENTHAM J, 1985, GENERALIZED QUANTIFI; Westerstahl D., 1985, GEN QUANTIFIERS NATU, P45","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/106.421.1",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","WE409","WOS:A1997WE40900001",,,,,"2018-01-02",372.0,"bachk bachk bachk bennettj chierchiag colep colepeter davidsond davidsond evansg fodorja fodorja fregeg fregegottlob frenchpa geachp griceh gricehp gricehp gricehp gricehp gricehp gricehp haler heimi jackendoffr kaplandavid lewisd lewisd perryj perryj quinewvo recanatifrancois recanatif reimerm reimerm schiffers smithnv sperberd stalnakerr stalnakerr vanbenthamj westerstahld bachk","cluster_0"
-0.1098275457644576,-0.11577763553521815,18.0,14.0,14.0,0.0,1.0,1993.0,102.0,406.0,233.0,246.0,14.0,"J","PARSONS, C",,,,"PARSONS, C",,,"ON SOME DIFFICULTIES CONCERNING INTUITION AND INTUITIVE KNOWLEDGE","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"PARSONS, C (reprint author), HARVARD UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,CAMBRIDGE,MA 02138, USA.",,,,,,"Boolos G., 1974, COMPUTABILITY LOGIC; Richard C.Jeffrey, 1981, COMPUTABILITY LOGIC; Boolos G. S., 1989, COMPUTABILITY LOGIC; BROMBERGER S, 1989, REFLECTIONS CHOMSKY, P58; BROMBERGR S, 1992, WHAT WE KNOW WE DONT; EVANS G, 1978, COLLECT PAPERS, P176; GEORGE A, 1993, MATH MIND; Hilbert David, 1968, GRUNDLAGEN MATH; HILBET D, 1934, GRUNDLAGEN MATH, V1; Maddy P., 1990, REALISM MATH; PARSONS C, 1971, ONTOLOGY MATH; Parsons Charles, 1983, MATH PHILOS SELECTED; PARSONS C, 1993, MATH MIND; Parsons Charles, 1979, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V80, P145; PARSONS C, 1986, LANGUAGE MIND LOGIC, P211; Tarski A., 1953, UNDECIDABLE THEORIES; TYMOCZKO T, 1993, MATH MIND; Wetzel Linda, 1989, PHILOS TOPICS, V17, P173","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/102.406.233",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","LB007","WOS:A1993LB00700002",,,,,"2018-01-02",373.0,"richardcjeffrey boolosgs brombergers brombergrs evansg georgea hilbertdavid hilbetd maddyp parsonsc parsonscharles parsonsc parsonscharles parsonsc tarskia tymoczkot wetzellinda boolosg","cluster_0"
-0.46835935826303926,-0.1432106257196272,12.0,14.0,14.0,0.0,1.0,1993.0,102.0,405.0,37.0,51.0,15.0,"J","MILLS, E",,,,"MILLS, E",,,"DIVIDING WITHOUT REDUCING - BODILY FISSION AND PERSONAL IDENTITY","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"MILLS, E (reprint author), VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIV,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,915 W FRANKLIN ST,RICHMOND,VA 23284, USA.",,,,,,"Cargile J., 1979, PARADOXES STUDY FORM; EHRING D, 1987, ANALYSIS, V47, P50, DOI 10.2307/3328710 ; HIRSCH E, 1991, PHILOS REV, V100, P3, DOI 10.2307/2185513 ; Lewis D., 1976, IDENTITIES PERSONS, P17; Lewis D., 1983, POSTSCRIPTS SURVIVAL, P73; Noonan H. W., 1989, PERSONAL IDENTITY; Parfit Derek, 1976, IDENTITIES PERSONS, P91; Parfit D., 1984, REASONS PERSONS; Rorty A., 1976, IDENTITIES PERSONS; ROVANE C, 1990, PHILOS REV, V99, P355, DOI 10.2307/2185348 ; ROVANE CA, 1987, J PHILOS, V84, P147, DOI 10.2307/2026596 ; SCHECHTMAN M, 1990, J PHILOS, V87, P71, DOI 10.2307/2026882","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/102.405.37",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","KK060","WOS:A1993KK06000002",,,,,"2018-01-02",374.0,"ehringd hirsche lewisd lewisd noonanhw parfitderek parfitd rortya rovanec rovaneca schechtmanm cargilej","cluster_3"
-0.806330348106864,-0.55348194545291,24.0,14.0,14.0,0.0,0.0,1989.0,98.0,390.0,179.0,205.0,27.0,"J","PENDLEBURY, M",,,,"PENDLEBURY, M",,,"THE PROJECTION STRATEGY AND THE TRUTH CONDITIONS OF CONDITIONAL-STATEMENTS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"PENDLEBURY, M (reprint author), UNIV WITWATERSRAND,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,JOHANNESBURG 2050,SOUTH AFRICA.",,,,,,"Adams E., 1975, LOGIC CONDITIONALS; ADAMS EW, 1970, FDN LANGUAGE, V6, P89; APPIAH A, 1985, ASSERTION CONDITIONA; BENNETT J, 1988, MIND, V97, P509; Blackburn S, 1984, SPREADING WORD; Clark R., 1973, CONCEPTUAL CHANGE, P42; DAVIS WA, 1979, PHILOS REV, V88, P544, DOI 10.2307/2184844 ; DUDMAN VH, 1984, ANALYSIS, V44, P145, DOI 10.2307/3327374 ; Dudman V. H., 1984, AUSTR J LINGUISTICS, V4, P143; Dudman V. C., 1983, AUSTR J LINGUISTICS, V3, P25; Gibbard Allan, 1981, IFS, P211; GRICE HP, 1967, IFS CONDITIONALS BEL; JACKSON F, 1979, PHILOS REV, V88, P565, DOI 10.2307/2184845 ; Jackson F., 1987, CONDITIONALS; JACKSON F, 1980, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V81, P125; Lewis D., 1973, COUNTERFACTUALS; David Lewis, 1981, IFS CONDITIONALS BEL, P129; PENDLEBURY M, 1986, MIND, V90, P361; PENDLEBURY M, 1987, J PHILOS LOGIC, V6, P229; Ramsey F., 1950, FDN MATH OTHER LOGIC, P237; Stalnaker R. C, 1981, IFS CONDITIONALS BEL, P41; Stalnaker Robert C., 1970, THEORIA-SPAIN, V36, P23; Stalnaker Robert C., 1984, INQUIRY; THOMASON RH, 1981, IFS CONDITIONALS BEL, P299","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","U7855","WOS:A1989U785500001",,,,,"2018-01-02",375.0,"adamsew appiaha bennettj blackburns clarkr daviswa dudmanvh dudmanvh dudmanvc gibbardallan gricehp jacksonf jacksonf jacksonf lewisd davidlewis pendleburym pendleburym ramseyf stalnakerrc stalnakerrobertc stalnakerrobertc thomasonrh adamse","cluster_3"
-0.7500482768832363,-0.6123771194796944,19.0,14.0,14.0,0.0,0.0,1989.0,98.0,389.0,59.0,79.0,21.0,"J","OWENS, D",,,,"OWENS, D",,,"LEVELS OF EXPLANATION","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"OWENS, D (reprint author), GIRTON COLL,CAMBRIDGE,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"BLACKBURN S, 1975, MIND LANGUAGE REALIT; CARNAP R, 1949, READINGS PHILOS ANAL; CHURCHLAND PS, 1986, NEUROPHILOSOPHY, pCH9; DAVIDSON D, ESSAYS ACTIONS EVENT, P223; DAVIDSON D, 1980, ESSAYS ACTIONS EVENT, P253; DENNETT D, 1987, INTENTIONAL STANCE, P25; Fodor J.A., 1981, REPRESENTATIONS; Hempel C. G., 1965, ASPECTS SCI EXPLANAT; HOOKER C, DIALOGUE, P496; HORNSBY J, 1980, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, P86; KIM J, 1982, PHILOS STUD, V41, P51, DOI 10.1007/BF00353523 ; KIM J, 1984, MIDWEST STUDIES PHIL; KIM J, 1978, AM PHILOS Q, P149; LEWIS D, 1986, COLLECTED PHILOS PAP; LOWE E, 1980, ANALYSIS, P50; MCGINN, 1980, SYNTHESE, P197; Nagel Ernest, 1961, STRUCTURE SCI, P345; PEACOCKE CAB, 1979, HOLISTIC EXPLANATION; SORABJI R, 1980, CAUSE BLAME, P9","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","T2314","WOS:A1989T231400004",,,,,"2018-01-02",376.0,"carnapr churchlandps davidsond davidsond dennettd fodorja hempelcg hookerc hornsbyj kimj kimj kimj lewisd lowee mcginn nagelernest peacockecab sorabjir blackburns","cluster_3"
-0.6068018162414136,-0.5379623646045396,18.0,14.0,14.0,0.0,0.0,1989.0,98.0,389.0,39.0,57.0,19.0,"J","SEGAL, G",,,,"SEGAL, G",,,"THE RETURN OF THE INDIVIDUAL","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"SEGAL, G (reprint author), UNIV WISCONSIN,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,MADISON,WI 53706, USA.",,,,,,"BLOCK N, IN PRESS MIDWEST STU; BURGE T, 1977, J PHILOS, P338; BURGE T, 1986, PHILOS REV; Evans G., 1982, VARIETIES REFERENCE; FODOR J, 1980, BEHAVIORAL BRAIN SCI; FODOR JA, PSYCHOSEMANTICS, pCH2; FODOR JA, 1987, PSYCHOSEMANTICS, pCH2; HIGGINBOTHAM J, IN PRESS LINGUISTICS; LOAR B, 1985, SOCIAL CONTENT PSYCH; McDowell J., 1986, SUBJECT THOUGHT CONT; MCGINN C, 1982, THOUGHT OBJECT; Perry J., 1979, NOUS, V1994, P167; Platts M., 1980, REFERENCE TRUTH REAL; SEARLE JR, 1983, INTENTIONALITY, pCH8; SEGAL G, IN PRESS PHILOS REV; Stich S, FOLK PSYCHOL COGNITI; WHITE S, 1982, PACIFIC PHILOS Q; Wright C., 1984, FREGE TRADITION INFL","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JAN",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","T2314","WOS:A1989T231400003",,,,,"2018-01-02",377.0,"burget burget evansg fodorj fodorja fodorja higginbothamj loarb mcdowellj mcginnc perryj plattsm searlejr segalg stichs whites wrightc blockn","cluster_0"
-0.5511398137967036,-0.36126801912792883,16.0,14.0,14.0,0.0,0.0,1988.0,97.0,387.0,333.0,342.0,10.0,"J","COLLINS, J",,,,"COLLINS, J",,,"BELIEF, DESIRE, AND REVISION","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"COLLINS, J (reprint author), MONASH UNIV,CLAYTON,VIC 3168,AUSTRALIA.",,,,,,"ELLIS B., 1979, RATIONAL BELIEF SYST; GARDENFORS, 1982, J PHILOS, P747; GARDENFORS P, 1982, 320311 PHILOS ESSAYS; GARDENFORS P, 1988, IN PRESS KNOWLEDGE F; GARDENFORS P, 1986, PHILOS REV, P81; HUMBERSTONE L, 1987, CANADIAN J PHILOS, P49; Jeffrey R., 1983, LOGIC DECISION; Levi I., 1980, ENTERPRISE KNOWLEDGE; LEWIS, 1986, PHILOS REV, P581; LEWIS, DESIRE BELIEF; LEWIS, 1976, PHILOS REV, P297; LEWIS D, 1988, MIND, V97, P323; SMITH M, 1987, MIND, P36; STALNAKER R, 1968, STUDIES LOGICAL THEO, P102; TELLER P, 1973, SYNTHESE, P218; VANFRAASSEN BC, 1986, ERKENNTNIS, P17","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","JUL",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","P5492","WOS:A1988P549200002",,,,,"2018-01-02",378.0,"gardenfors gardenforsp gardenforsp gardenforsp humberstonel jeffreyr levii lewis lewis lewis lewisd smithm stalnakerr tellerp vanfraassenbc ellisb","cluster_3"
-0.13088004768812322,0.03655317785044345,3.0,14.0,14.0,0.0,1.0,1987.0,96.0,384.0,530.0,533.0,4.0,"J","PETTIT, P",,,,"PETTIT, P",,,"HUMEANS, ANTI-HUMEANS, AND MOTIVATION","MIND",,,"English","Discussion",,,,,,,,,,"PETTIT, P (reprint author), AUSTRALIAN NATL UNIV,RES SCH SOCIAL SCI,CANBERRA,ACT 2601,AUSTRALIA.",,,,,,"MELLOR DH, 1983, SOCIAL THEORY PRACTI; PETTIT P, 1987, MIND, P79; SMITH M, 1987, MIND, P36","OXFORD UNIV PRESS UNITED KINGDOM","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","K9527","WOS:A1987K952700008",,,,,"2018-01-02",379.0,"pettitp smithm mellordh","cluster_6"
0.054057702155438155,-0.016110025539230535,14.0,14.0,14.0,0.0,1.0,1984.0,93.0,371.0,336.0,350.0,15.0,"J","KANE, R",,,,"KANE, R",,,"THE MODAL ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"KANE, R (reprint author), UNIV TEXAS,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,AUSTIN,TX 78712, USA.",,,,,,"ANSELM, BASIC WRITINGS; AQUINAS T, BASIC WRITINGS; Hartshorne Ch, 1965, ANSELMS DISCOVERY; Hartshorne Caroli, 1941, MANS VISION GOD LOGI; Hartshorne Charles, 1962, LOGIC PERFECTION; HENLE P, 1961, PHILOS REV, V70; Hughes G., 1968, INTRO MODAL LOGIC; Kant Immanuel, CRITIQUE PURE REASON; Lucas Billy Joe, 1981, THESIS U TEXAS AUSTI; MALCOLM N, 1960, PHILOS REV, V69, P41, DOI 10.2307/2182266 ; Plantinga A., 1974, NATURE NECESSITY; Plantinga A. C., 1974, GOD FREEDOM EVIL; ROWE W, 1978, PHILOS RELIG; VANINWAGEN P, 1977, NOUS, P375","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","SZ496","WOS:A1984SZ49600002",,,,,"2018-01-02",380.0,"aquinast hartshornech hartshornecaroli hartshornecharles henlep hughesg kantimmanuel lucasbillyjoe malcolmn plantingaa plantingaac rowew vaninwagenp anselm","cluster_1"
-0.05090936929354893,0.0188282286194284,2.0,14.0,14.0,0.0,0.0,1984.0,93.0,371.0,370.0,380.0,11.0,"J","KLAGGE, JC",,,,"KLAGGE, JC",,,"AN ALLEGED DIFFICULTY CONCERNING MORAL PROPERTIES","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"KLAGGE, JC (reprint author), UNIV CALIF SAN DIEGO,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,LA JOLLA,CA 92093, USA.",,,,,,"Blackburn S., 1971, MORALITY MORAL REASO; Blackburn Simon, 1980, MIDWEST STUDIES PHIL","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","WALTON ST JOURNALS DEPT, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","SZ496","WOS:A1984SZ49600004",,,,,"2018-01-02",381.0,"blackburnsimon blackburns","cluster_6"
-0.4030960026644653,-0.3583470405088207,10.0,14.0,14.0,0.0,0.0,1983.0,92.0,365.0,1.0,20.0,20.0,"J","NOONAN, H",,,,"NOONAN, H",,,"THE NECESSITY OF ORIGIN + SAMENESS OF ORIGIN AND IDENTITY","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"NOONAN, H (reprint author), UNIV BIRMINGHAM,DEPT PHILOSOPHY,BIRMINGHAM B15 2TT,W MIDLANDS,ENGLAND.",,,,,,"CHANDLER H, 1976, ANALYSIS JAN; DAVIDSON D, 1972, SEMANTICS NATURAL LA; EVANS G, 1978, ANALYSIS OCT; FORBES G, 1980, PHILOS STUDIES; Gupta A., 1980, LOGIC COMMON NOUNS; Lewis David, 1976, IDENTITIES PERSONS; NOONAN H, 1982, ANALYSIS JAN; PERRY J, 1972, J PHILOS; SALMON N, 1979, J PHILOS; SHOEMAKER S, 1971, AM PHILOS Q","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","QA876","WOS:A1983QA87600001",,,,,"2018-01-02",382.0,"davidsond evansg forbesg guptaa lewisdavid noonanh perryj salmonn shoemakers chandlerh","cluster_0"
-0.030087951340961438,0.15670543885350952,12.0,14.0,14.0,0.0,0.0,1982.0,91.0,363.0,358.0,376.0,19.0,"J","KEKES, J",,,,"KEKES, J",,,"HAPPINESS","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"KEKES, J (reprint author), SUNY ALBANY,ALBANY,NY 12222, USA.",,,,,,"Aristotle, EUDEMIAN ETHICS; Aristotle, NICOMACHEAN ETHICS; BOLT R, 1963, MAN FOR ALL SEASONS; Dilman Illham, 1979, MORALITY INNER LIFE; ELLIS B, 1980, PAC PHILOS QUART, V61, P85; FOOT P, 1958, ARISTOTELIAN SOC P, V59, P102; Frankfurt H., 1971, J PHILOS, V68, P5, DOI DOI 10.2307/2024717; Hampshire S., 1978, PUBLIC PRIVATE MORAL, P1; HARDIE W. F. R., 1967, ARISTOTLE, P297; KRAUT R, 1979, PHILOS REV, V88, P167, DOI 10.2307/2184505 ; Murdoch Iris, 1968, NICE GOOD; Oakeshott M., 1962, RATIONALISM POLITICS","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","NZ720","WOS:A1982NZ72000003",,,,,"2018-01-02",383.0,"aristotle boltr dilmanillham ellisb footp frankfurth hampshires hardiewfr krautr murdochiris oakeshottm aristotle","cluster_6"
-0.03898450305050544,-0.03009596765943071,9.0,14.0,14.0,0.0,0.0,1982.0,91.0,364.0,524.0,540.0,17.0,"J","ROBINSON, WS",,,,"ROBINSON, WS",,,"CAUSATION, SENSATIONS AND KNOWLEDGE","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"ROBINSON, WS (reprint author), IOWA STATE UNIV SCI & TECHNOL,AMES,IA 50011, USA.",,,,,,"DENNETT DC, 1978, AM PHILOS Q, V15, P252; GOLDMAN AI, 1969, PHILOS REV, V78, P468, DOI 10.2307/2184199 ; PEACOCKE CAB, 1979, HOLISTIC EXPLANATION; ROBINSON WS, 1979, AM PHILOS QUART, V16, P327; ROBINSON WS, SELLARSIAN MATERIALI; ROBINSON WS, 1982, PHILOS BASIC ISSUES; Sellars W., 1963, SCI PERCEPTION REALI; Sellars W., 1981, MONIST, V64; SUSSMAN AN, 1981, J PHILOS, V78, P95, DOI 10.2307/2025902","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","PM109","WOS:A1982PM10900003",,,,,"2018-01-02",384.0,"goldmanai peacockecab robinsonws robinsonws robinsonws sellarsw sellarsw sussmanan dennettdc","cluster_0"
-0.05386636727616928,0.25717700447631314,10.0,14.0,14.0,0.0,1.0,1981.0,90.0,357.0,20.0,40.0,21.0,"J","KAHN, CH",,,,"KAHN, CH",,,"ARISTOTLE AND ALTRUISM","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"KAHN, CH (reprint author), UNIV PENN,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19104, USA.",,,,,,"ANNAS J, 1977, MIND, P542; ARISTOTLE, POSTERIOR ANALYTICS; COOPER J, 1977, REV METAPHYS, V30, P621; HAMLYN DW, 1976, PHRONESIS, V21, P177; Hardie W. F. R., 1968, ARISTOTLES ETHICAL T; Kenny Anthony, 1978, ARISTOTELIAN ETHICS; MACKIE JL, 1949, HIBBERT J, V48; Nagel T., 1970, POSSIBILITY ALTRUISM; PSEUDO ARISTOTL, MAGNA MORALIA; Roberts T. A., 1970, BUTLERS 15 SERMONS","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","KZ154","WOS:A1981KZ15400002",,,,,"2018-01-02",385.0,"aristotle cooperj hamlyndw hardiewfr kennyanthony mackiejl nagelt pseudoaristotl robertsta annasj","cluster_6"
0.06299313816892618,0.04415245687146776,15.0,14.0,14.0,0.0,0.0,1978.0,87.0,346.0,181.0,194.0,14.0,"J","LESLIE, J",,,,"LESLIE, J",,,"EFFORTS TO EXPLAIN ALL EXISTENCE","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,"LESLIE, J (reprint author), UNIV GUELPH,GUELPH N1G 2W1,ONTARIO,CANADA.",,,,,,"ARISTOTLE, 1071, METAPHYSICS; BERGSON, 2 SOURCES MORALITY R; BRADLEY FH, PRINCIPLE S LOGIC, V1, pCH3; GRUA G, GW LEIBNIZ TEXTES IN, P315; GRUNBAUM A, PHILOSOPHY SCI, P423; HUMES, TREATISE 3; LEIBNIZ GW, PRINCIPLES NATURE GR; LESLIE J, 1976, AM PHILOSOPHICAL QUA; LESLIE J, 1971, STUDIA LEIBNITIANA, V3, P3; LESLIE J, CHALLENGE RELIGION T; LESLIE J, 1972, AM PHILOSOPHICAL QUA; LESLIE J, 1973, IDEALISTIC STUDI SEP; LESLIE J, 1970, AM PHILOSOPHICAL OCT; LUIJPEN WA, PHENOMENOLOGY PERCEP; VONWRIGHT GH, LOGICAL STUDIES","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND OX2 6DP","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","EU787","WOS:A1978EU78700002",,,,,"2018-01-02",386.0,"bergson bradleyfh gruag grunbauma humes leibnizgw lesliej lesliej lesliej lesliej lesliej lesliej luijpenwa vonwrightgh aristotle","cluster_4"
0.02683816866272327,0.02849527208937385,5.0,14.0,14.0,0.0,5.0,1964.0,73.0,290.0,234.0,245.0,12.0,"J","GUNDERSON, K",,,,"GUNDERSON, K",,,"THE IMITATION GAME .7.","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"SCRIVEN M, 1953, MIND; SCRIVEN M, DIMENSIONS MIND; SHANNON CE, AUTOMATA STUDIES; ZIFF P, 1959, ANALYSIS, P66; 1950, MIND, V59, P433","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423",,,"MIND","Mind",,,,,,,,,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","CCP56","WOS:A1964CCP5600007",,,,,"2018-01-02",388.0,"scrivenm shannonce ziffp scrivenm","cluster_0"
-0.9451289706084401,-0.5966833846529223,62.0,13.0,13.0,0.0,0.0,2015.0,124.0,494.0,449.0,491.0,43.0,"J","Hedden, B",,,,"Hedden, Brian",,,"Time-Slice Rationality","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"DUTCH-BOOK ARGUMENTS; REFLECTION; CONDITIONALIZATION; DISAGREEMENT; EPISTEMOLOGY; COHERENCE; BELIEFS; CHANCE","I advocate Time-Slice Rationality, the thesis that the relationship between two time-slices of the same person is not importantly different, for purposes of rational evaluation, from the relationship between time-slices of distinct persons. The locus of rationality, so to speak, is the time-slice rather than the temporally extended agent. This claim is motivated by consideration of puzzle cases for personal identity over time and by a very moderate form of internalism about rationality. Time-Slice Rationality conflicts with two proposed principles of rationality, Conditionalization and Reflection. Conditionalization is a diachronic norm saying how your current degrees of belief should fit with your old ones, while Reflection is a norm enjoining you to defer to the degrees of belief that you expect to have in the future. But they are independently problematic and should be replaced by improved, time-slice-centric principles. Conditionalization should be replaced by a synchronic norm saying what degrees of belief you ought to have given your current evidence and Reflection should be replaced by a norm which instructs you to defer to the degrees of belief of agents you take to be experts. These replacement principles do all the work that the old principles were supposed to do while avoiding their problems. In this way, Time-Slice Rationality puts the theory of rationality on firmer foundations and yields better norms than alternative, non-time-slice-centric approaches.","Univ Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, England","Hedden, B (reprint author), Univ Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, England.","brian.hedden@gmail.com",,,,,"Arntzenius F, 2003, J PHILOS, V100, P356, DOI 10.5840/jphil2003100729 ; AUMANN RJ, 1976, ANN STAT, V4, P1236, DOI 10.1214/aos/1176343654 ; Berker Selim, 2008, PHILOS IMPRINT, VVIII, P1; Briggs R, 2009, PHILOS REV, V118, P59, DOI 10.1215/00318108-2008-029; Broome J, 2007, MIND, V116, P359, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzm359; BURGE T, 1993, PHILOS REV, V102, P457, DOI 10.2307/2185680 ; Carnap Rudolf, 1950, LOGICAL FDN PROBABIL; CHRISTENSEN D, 1991, PHILOS REV, V100, P229, DOI 10.2307/2185301 ; Christensen D, 2000, PHILOS REV, V109, P349, DOI 10.1215/00318108-109-3-349; Christensen D, 1996, J PHILOS, V93, P450, DOI 10.2307/2940893 ; CHRISTENSEN D, 1994, NOUS, V28, P69, DOI 10.2307/2215920 ; Christensen D, 2007, PHILOS REV, V116, P187, DOI 10.1215/00318108-2006-035; Conee Earl, 2001, INTERNALISM DEFENDED, P1; Dunn J. Michael, 1990, TRUTH CONSEQUENCES; Elga A, 2007, NOUS, V41, P478, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2007.00656.x ; Elga A, 2010, PHILOS IMPRINT, V10, P1; Fricker Elizabeth, 2009, IS KNOWING MENTAL ST, P31; Gaifman Haim, 1988, THEORY HIGHER ORDER, P191; Gendler Tamar Szabo, 2010, OXFORD STUDIES EPIST, V3; GOODMAN N., 1955, FACT FICTION FORECAS; Greco Daniel, J PHILOS IN PRESS; GREENOUGH P., 2009, WILLIAMSON KNOWLEDGE; Hall N, 2004, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V82, P93, DOI 10.1080/713659806 ; HALL N, 1994, MIND, V103, P505, DOI 10.1093/mind/103.412.505 ; Hall N, 1999, MIND, V108, P647, DOI 10.1093/mind/108.432.647 ; Hedden Brian, 2013, PHILOS PHENOMENOLOGI, P87; Hedden B, 2012, PHILOS STUD, V158, P343, DOI 10.1007/s11098-012-9880-0; Jeffrey Richard C., 1983, LOGIC DECISION, V2; Jeffrey Richard C., 1980, STUDIES INDUCTIVE LO, VII; Joyce JM, 2010, PHILOS PERSPECT, V24, P281, DOI 10.1111/j.1520-8583.2010.00194.x; Kelly Thomas, 2013, EVIDENCE CAN BE PERM, P298; Kolodny Niko, 2007, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V107, P229, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1467-9264.2007.00220.X; Kolodny N, 2007, MIND, V116, P371, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzm371; KORNBLITH H, 2001, EPISTEMOLOGY INTERNA; Lasonen-Aarnio M., 2010, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V24, P1; Lewis D., 1980, STUDIES LOGIC PROBAB, P83; Lewis David, 1999, WHY CONDITIONALIZE, P403; LEWIS D., 1986, PHILOS PAPERS, VII; Lewis David K, 1999, PAPERS METAPHYSICS E; Mahtani A, 2012, PHILOS REV, V121, P443, DOI 10.1215/00318108-1574445; Meacham CJG, 2008, PHILOS STUD, V138, P245, DOI 10.1007/s11098-006-9036-1; Meacham Christopher J. G, 2013, ERKENNTNIS, P1; Meacham Christopher J. G., 2010, UNRAVELLING TANGLED, P86; Moss Sarah, 2014, NOUS, P48; Parfit D., 1984, REASONS PERSONS; Putnam H., 1975, MINNESOTA STUDIES PH, V7, P131; Rosen G, 2001, NOUS, P69; SKYRMS B, 1987, PHILOS SCI, V54, P1, DOI 10.1086/289350 ; Skyrms B., 1988, CAUSATION CHANCE CRE; Smithies Declan, 2006, THESIS NEW YORK U; Steup Matthias, 2013, CONT DEBATES EPISTEM; TALBOTT W., 2008, STANFORD ENCY PHILOS; Titelbaum M, 2013, QUITTING CERTAINTIES; VANFRAASEN BC, 1990, FIGURES PROBABILITY, P345; van Fraassen Bas, 1989, LAWS SYMMETRY; VANFRAASSEN BC, 1984, J PHILOS, V81, P235; Weisberg Jonathan, 2009, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V73, P793; Weisberg J, 2007, PHILOS STUD, V135, P179, DOI 10.1007/s11098-007-9073-4; White R., 2007, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V19, P445; Williamson Jon, 2010, DEFENSE OBJECTIVE BA; Williamson T., 2000, KNOWLEDGE ITS LIMITS; Williamson Timothy, 1997, MIND, V106, P1","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423","1460-2113",,"MIND","Mind","APR",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzu181",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","CU4FR","WOS:000363483100002",,,,,"2018-01-02",390.0,"aumannrj berkerselim briggsr broomej burget carnaprudolf christensend christensend christensend christensend christensend coneeearl dunnjmichael elgaa elgaa frickerelizabeth gaifmanhaim gendlertamarszabo goodmann grecodaniel greenoughp halln halln halln heddenbrian heddenb jeffreyrichardc jeffreyrichardc joycejm kellythomas kolodnyniko kolodnyn kornblithh lasonenaarniom lewisd lewisdavid lewisd lewisdavidk mahtania meachamcjg meachamchristopherjg meachamchristopherjg mosssarah parfitd putnamh roseng skyrmsb skyrmsb smithiesdeclan steupmatthias talbottw titelbaumm vanfraasenbc vanfraassenbas vanfraassenbc weisbergjonathan weisbergj whiter williamsonjon williamsont williamsontimothy arntzeniusf","cluster_3"
-0.3039381389247126,-0.3126037581357511,33.0,13.0,13.0,0.0,2.0,2013.0,122.0,488.0,841.0,866.0,26.0,"J","Cobreros, P; Egre, P; Ripley, D; van Rooij, R",,,,"Cobreros, Pablo; Egre, Paul; Ripley, David; van Rooij, Robert",,,"Reaching Transparent Truth","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"LOGIC","This paper presents and defends a way to add a transparent truth predicate to classical logic, such that T < A > and A are everywhere intersubstitutable, where all T-biconditionals hold, and where truth can be made compositional. A key feature of our framework, called STTT (for Strict-Tolerant Transparent Truth), is that it supports a non-transitive relation of consequence. At the same time, it can be seen that the only failures of transitivity STTT allows for arise in paradoxical cases.","[Cobreros, Pablo] Univ Navarra, E-31080 Pamplona, Spain; [Egre, Paul] Inst Jean Nicod CNRS EHESS ENS, Paris, France; [Ripley, David] Univ Connecticut, Storrs, CT USA; [van Rooij, Robert] Univ Amsterdam, Inst Log Language & Computat, NL-1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands","Cobreros, P (reprint author), Univ Navarra, E-31080 Pamplona, Spain.","pcobreros@unav.es; paul.egre@ens.fr; davewripley@gmail.com; R.A.M.vanRooij@uva.nl",,,,,"ANDERSON A. R., 1975, ENTAILMENT LOGIC REL, VI; Beall J, 2004, ANALYSIS, V64, P30, DOI 10.1111/j.0003-2638.2004.00456.x ; Beall J, 2013, J PHILOS, V110, P143, DOI 10.5840/jphil2013110336 ; Boolos G., 1995, LOGIC PROVABILITY; Brady R., 2006, UNIVERSAL LOGIC; Cobreros P, 2012, STUD LOGICA, V100, P855, DOI 10.1007/s11225-012-9422-y; Cobreros P, 2012, J PHILOS LOGIC, V41, P347, DOI 10.1007/s10992-010-9165-z; Dunn J.M., 2001, ALGEBRAIC METHODS PH; Field H., 2008, SAVING TRUTH PARADOX; Frankowski S, 2004, B SECTION LOGIC, V33, P41; FRIEDMAN H, 1987, ANN PURE APPL LOGIC, V33, P1, DOI 10.1016/0168-0072(87)90073-X ; Gupta A., 1993, REVISION THEORY TRUT; Halbach V, 2006, J SYMBOLIC LOGIC, V71, P677, DOI 10.2178/jsl/1146620166; Halbach V., 2011, AXIOMATIC THEORIES T; Hyde D, 1997, MIND, V106, P641, DOI 10.1093/mind/106.424.641 ; Kleene S. C., 1952, INTRO METAMATHEMATIC; KREMER M, 1988, J PHILOS LOGIC, V17, P225; KRIPKE S, 1975, J PHILOS, V72, P690, DOI 10.2307/2024634 ; Leitgeb H., 2007, PHILOS COMPASS, V2, P276; Maudlin T., 2004, TRUTH PARADOX; MCGEE V, 1985, J PHILOS LOGIC, V14, P399, DOI 10.1007/BF00649483 ; MOSCHOVAKIS YN, 1974, ELEMENTARY INDUCTION; Nait-Abdallah A., 1995, LOGIC PARTIAL INFORM; Negri S., 2001, STRUCTURAL PROOF THE; Priest G, 2006, CONTRADICTION; Priest G., 1989, PARACONSISTENT LOGIC; Priest G., 2006, DOUBT TRUTH BE LIAR; Priest G, 2008, INTRO NONCLASSICAL L; Quine W. V., 1970, PHILOS LOGIC; Ripley D, 2013, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V91, P139, DOI 10.1080/00048402.2011.630010; Ripley D, 2012, REV SYMB LOGIC, V5, P354, DOI 10.1017/S1755020312000056; Weir A., 2005, DEFLATIONISM PARADOX, P218; Zardini E, 2011, REV SYMB LOG, V4, P498, DOI 10.1017/S1755020311000177","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423","1460-2113",,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzt110",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","AH5ZE","WOS:000336209400001",,,,,"2018-01-02",391.0,"beallj beallj boolosg bradyr cobrerosp cobrerosp dunnjm fieldh frankowskis friedmanh guptaa halbachv halbachv hyded kleenesc kremerm kripkes leitgebh maudlint mcgeev moschovakisyn naitabdallaha negris priestg priestg priestg priestg quinewv ripleyd ripleyd weira zardinie andersonar","cluster_0"
-0.443255843704263,-0.3461411776437519,17.0,13.0,13.0,0.0,6.0,2013.0,122.0,488.0,915.0,952.0,38.0,"J","Greaves, H",,,,"Greaves, Hilary",,,"Epistemic Decision Theory","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"OBJECTIVE JUSTIFICATION; CONDITIONALIZATION; INACCURACY","I explore the prospects for modelling epistemic rationality (in the probabilist setting) via an epistemic decision theory, in a consequentialist spirit. Previous work has focused on cases in which the truth-values of the propositions in which the agent is selecting credences do not depend, either causally or merely evidentially, on the agent's choice of credences. Relaxing that restriction leads to a proliferation of puzzle cases and theories to deal with them, including epistemic analogues of evidential and causal decision theory, and of the Newcomb Problem and 'Psychopath Button' Problem. A variant of causal epistemic decision theory deals well with most cases. However, there is a recalcitrant class of problem cases for which no epistemic decision theory seems able to match our intuitive judgements of epistemic rationality. This lends both precision and credence to the view that there is a fundamental mismatch between epistemic consequentialism and the intuitive notion of epistemic rationality; the implications for understanding the latter are briefly discussed.","Univ Oxford, Fac Philosophy, Oxford OX1 2JD, England","Greaves, H (reprint author), Univ Oxford, Fac Philosophy, Oxford OX1 2JD, England.","hilary.greaves@philosophy.ox.ac.uk",,,,,"Arntzenius F, 2008, ERKENNTNIS, V68, P277, DOI 10.1007/s10670-007-9084-8; Caie M, 2013, PHILOS REV, V122, P527, DOI 10.1215/00318108-2315288; Egan A, 2007, PHILOS REV, V116, P93, DOI 10.1215/00318108-2006-023; Greaves H, 2006, MIND, V115, P607, DOI 10.1093/mind/fzl607; Jeffrey Richard., 1965, LOGIC DECISION; Joyce J. M., 1999, FDN CAUSAL DECISION; Kelly T, 2003, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V66, P612, DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00281.x ; Leitgeb H, 2010, PHILOS SCI, V77, P201, DOI 10.1086/651317 ; Leitgeb H, 2010, PHILOS SCI, V77, P236, DOI 10.1086/651318 ; Levi Isaac, 1967, GAMBLING TRUTH; LEWIS D, 1981, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V59, P5, DOI 10.1080/00048408112340011 ; Maher Patrick, 1993, BETTING ON THEORIES; Oddie G, 1997, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V48, P533, DOI 10.1093/bjps/48.4.533 ; Savage L. J., 1972, FDN STAT; Skyrms B., 1990, DYNAMICS RATIONAL DE; Stalnaker R. C., 2002, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC S, V76, P153; Wedgwood Ralph, 2002, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V16, P267","OXFORD UNIV PRESS","OXFORD","GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","0026-4423","1460-2113",,"MIND","Mind","OCT",,,,,,"10.1093/mind/fzt090",,,,"Philosophy","Philosophy","AH5ZE","WOS:000336209400003",,,,,"2018-01-02",392.0,"caiem egana greavesh jeffreyrichard joycejm kellyt leitgebh leitgebh leviisaac lewisd maherpatrick oddieg savagelj skyrmsb stalnakerrc wedgwoodralph arntzeniusf","cluster_3"
-1.5851671247587342,-1.2629782311502782,100.0,13.0,13.0,0.0,3.0,2013.0,122.0,487.0,699.0,747.0,49.0,"J","Schellenberg, S",,,,"Schellenberg, Susanna",,,"Experience and Evidence","MIND",,,"English","Article",,,,,,,"PREATTENTIVE TEXTURE-DISCRIMINATION; KNOWLEDGE; VISION; TRANSPARENCY; PERCEPTION; DOGMATISM; DEFENSE; WORLD","I argue that perceptual experience provides us with both phenomenal and factive evidence. To a first approximation, we can understand phenomenal evidence as determined by how our environment sensorily seems to us when we are experiencing. To a first approximation, we can understand factive evidence as necessarily determined by the environm
Raw
index.html
View raw

(Sorry about that, but we can’t show files that are this big right now.)

Raw
scatter.css
View raw

(Sorry about that, but we can’t show files that are this big right now.)

Raw
scatter.js
View raw

(Sorry about that, but we can’t show files that are this big right now.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment