You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
Phill
Paraphraser
I wrote my first line of code in 1975. I've worked for the Aussie government, for local and multinational corporates, and in the tertiary education sector.
IOTstack tutorial: removing bad data from InfluxDB
IOTstack tutorial: removing bad data from InfluxDB
A fairly common question from IOTstack users running InfluxDB is how to remove "bad data" from a database?
This gist focuses on InfluxDB 1.8 and the InfluxQL commands needed to operate upon an InfluxDB 1.8 database. You are entirely on your own if you are using InfluxDB 2.x.
prevention is better than cure
The best advice I can give you is to avoid the problem by ensuring that "bad data" never gets into your database in the first place. For example:
The following question appeared on the IOTstack Discord channel. It's the second part of a thread but I'll come back to the first part later:
I'm still struggling with this error. So the instruction says don't assign a password for root during the Debian installation. HOWEVER, the OS image that I'm using already comes with a default root password and I have to enter the default password to continue at the first step. Is there any way to remove this default password? Otherwise, it seems there is no way to continue the installations on this OS...
I don't want to over-sell this but the general thrust of the Unix industry over the last 20-odd years has been to avoid enabling the root account. In more recent times, security gurus, legislatures and best practice have been leading us to a world where there are no default accounts for anything.
IOTstack tutorial: running two instances of Node-RED on the same host
IOTstack tutorial: running two instances of Node-RED on the same host
Suppose you have a Node-RED container running but you want to create a test version where you can experiment safely without disturbing the original.
Running multiple instances of a container is something Docker excels at! This tutorial explains how to set it up. It will also help you to understand the differences between containers running in host mode and non-host mode.
Assumptions
Your existing Node-RED service definition looks similar to this:
The following problem was reported on the IOTstack Discord channel:
Today I rebuild my IOTstack from scratch using the Pibuild process and after restoring my nodered flows I noticed that my serials and GPIO are not connecting anymore.
I don't use node-red-node-pi-gpiod myself but I have been able to reproduce the problem.
One of the main advantages of running services in Docker containers is the relative ease of reverting to the last-known-good container.
One of the biggest problems with reverting to the last-known-good container arises if you don't already know the tag of the image you want to revert to. Sometimes it can be a bit tricky to figure it out. You usually need to go to the container's "tags" page on DockerHub, sort through the update history for your architecture, pick the appropriate tag, edit your compose file to specify that tag, and then, in the words of the old Knight in the third Indiana Jones movie, hope that you have "chosen wisely".
Your chances of choosing wisely are inversely proportional to the amount of panic you're feeling after you realise a key container isn't working and reverting is your best strategy. Panic is the enemy of clear thinking and reasoning.
There is, however, another way. The method described here means you retain the last-known-
A question on Discord described a situation where a new (empty) database had been created. That database contained data acquired since the rebuild but had no historical data prior to the rebuild. However, the person did have a "portable" backup of the older data and wanted to know if it was possible to merge the backup with the live data?
The answer is "yes". Merging measurements will solve this particular problem.
You are probably familiar with running a command like:
$ docker-compose up -d
You probably expect that command to bring up a container for every service definition mentioned in your docker-compose.yml. That's its default behaviour.