Testing Walking classifier using data from records that matched pattern:
recorded_records.*phone.*walking_right-back
Using 4 features for specific classifications:
- Standard Deviation Accelerometer
- Variance Accelerometer
- Mean Absolute Difference Accelerometer
- Mean Accelerometer
Testing against data from Thomas Kellermeier
210 classifications calculated, final result is 90%
Training ratio | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | 50% | 75% | 100% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Classification | 54% | 72% | 69% | 74% | 85% | 84% | 91% | 90% |
Delta to final | -36% | -19% | -21% | -16% | -5% | -7% | 0% | π |
Testing against data from Franziska Eder
124 classifications calculated, final result is 14%
Training ratio | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | 50% | 75% | 100% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Classification | 6% | 13% | 11% | 12% | 15% | 16% | 14% | 14% |
Delta to final | -9% | -2% | -3% | -2% | 1% | 2% | 0% | π |
Testing against data from Stephan Schultz
108 classifications calculated, final result is 12%
Training ratio | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | 50% | 75% | 100% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Classification | 2% | 17% | 11% | 12% | 13% | 12% | 12% | 12% |
Delta to final | -9% | 5% | -1% | 0% | 1% | 1% | 0% | π |
Testing against data from Thomas Kellermeier
210 classifications calculated, final result is 80%
β Classification is higher than expected, this would be a false positive
Training ratio | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | 50% | 75% | 100% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Classification | 9% | 38% | 26% | 64% | 63% | 64% | 57% | 80% |
Delta to final | -71% | -42% | -54% | -17% | -17% | -16% | -23% | π |
Testing against data from Franziska Eder
124 classifications calculated, final result is 85%
Training ratio | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | 50% | 75% | 100% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Classification | 46% | 49% | 45% | 65% | 75% | 79% | 81% | 85% |
Delta to final | -39% | -36% | -40% | -20% | -10% | -6% | -4% | π |
Testing against data from Stephan Schultz
108 classifications calculated, final result is 53%
Training ratio | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | 50% | 75% | 100% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Classification | 22% | 20% | 16% | 37% | 45% | 52% | 39% | 53% |
Delta to final | -31% | -33% | -37% | -15% | -8% | -1% | -13% | π |
Testing against data from Thomas Kellermeier
210 classifications calculated, final result is 42%
Training ratio | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | 50% | 75% | 100% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Classification | 75% | 69% | 64% | 54% | 53% | 61% | 43% | 42% |
Delta to final | 33% | 26% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 19% | 0% | π |
Testing against data from Franziska Eder
124 classifications calculated, final result is 47%
Training ratio | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | 50% | 75% | 100% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Classification | 73% | 36% | 26% | 23% | 24% | 37% | 36% | 47% |
Delta to final | 26% | -11% | -21% | -24% | -23% | -10% | -11% | π |
Testing against data from Stephan Schultz
108 classifications calculated, final result is 86%
Training ratio | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | 50% | 75% | 100% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Classification | 98% | 80% | 82% | 78% | 80% | 85% | 84% | 86% |
Delta to final | 12% | -6% | -4% | -8% | -6% | -1% | -2% | π |