Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@Whateverable
Created Mar 6, 2020
Embed
What would you like to do?
bisectable6
{ dd MY::.keys.sort }
Bisecting: 5703 revisions left to test after this (roughly 13 steps)
[e2ec569b7cd693847583becca597206a10d2dc89] Implement IO::Handle.slurp(:bin)
»»»»» Testing e2ec569b7cd693847583becca597206a10d2dc89
»»»»» Script output:
("\$*DISPATCHER", "\$_").Seq
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
("\$*DISPATCHER", "\$_")
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing f0398fbc5ce7660507015953f7e5d10b997793be
»»»»» Script output:
("\$*DISPATCHER", "\$_")
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
("\$*DISPATCHER", "\$_")
»»»»» The output is identical
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing e79d749864f287d0f38893ad00ab6976e203df2d
»»»»» Script output:
("\$*DISPATCHER", "\$_").Seq
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
("\$*DISPATCHER", "\$_")
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 1ebe41d9e3047c9c27bd6c194563f98cb9fe5b8d
»»»»» Script output:
("\$*DISPATCHER", "\$_").Seq
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
("\$*DISPATCHER", "\$_")
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing e0201f15dffcef82af8750a3d8ca77341b0a8e7f
»»»»» Script output:
("\$*DISPATCHER", "\$_").Seq
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
("\$*DISPATCHER", "\$_")
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 06abb07f069b026883648afb4c9092f3a6a5de94
»»»»» Script output:
("\$*DISPATCHER", "\$_").Seq
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
("\$*DISPATCHER", "\$_")
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing d7cd5dff8cd64d06432baea2f05b9b7264ab3ccc
»»»»» Script output:
("\$*DISPATCHER", "\$_").Seq
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
("\$*DISPATCHER", "\$_")
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 9594a3ece38ca212023cf3ece7405d955303db13
»»»»» Script output:
("\$*DISPATCHER", "\$_")
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
("\$*DISPATCHER", "\$_")
»»»»» The output is identical
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing acec1ea6cf2ad8fe001a108bf7007586a329eda5
»»»»» Script output:
("\$*DISPATCHER", "\$_").Seq
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
("\$*DISPATCHER", "\$_")
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing b0e61f32b889a9e63ffaf30c60f92616550795e3
»»»»» Script output:
("\$*DISPATCHER", "\$_").Seq
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
("\$*DISPATCHER", "\$_")
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 3baffe71a8e1b49d709d9bcbce228c023587e69d
»»»»» Script output:
("\$*DISPATCHER", "\$_")
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
("\$*DISPATCHER", "\$_")
»»»»» The output is identical
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 5023bf39f102697ae52707661a29547ab0938ab2
»»»»» Script output:
("\$*DISPATCHER", "\$_").Seq
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
("\$*DISPATCHER", "\$_")
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 434bf75b9d69747f8b13de92a64bde296ecab5be
»»»»» Script output:
("\$*DISPATCHER", "\$_").Seq
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
("\$*DISPATCHER", "\$_")
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing dbbf9dd169ab730d8835d0ee29088112fcbbbc16
»»»»» Script output:
("\$*DISPATCHER", "\$_")
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
("\$*DISPATCHER", "\$_")
»»»»» The output is identical
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
434bf75b9d69747f8b13de92a64bde296ecab5be is the first new commit
commit 434bf75b9d69747f8b13de92a64bde296ecab5be
Author: Elizabeth Mattijsen <liz@dijkmat.nl>
Date: Wed Dec 28 09:48:13 2016 +0100
Make .sort always return a .Seq
This is not really about performance but really about (possible)
correctness. This makes a few spectests fail that test for the return
type of .sort being a List (which one could consider to be faulty).
:040000 040000 dfd80c33310dbe79c3e05674d04254be2f682dd1 fe3fda2f102b0437a0fe65c4653892ba99e2056d M src
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment