Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@Whateverable
Created February 25, 2018 11:15
  • Star 0 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
Star You must be signed in to star a gist
Save Whateverable/66a1b39ae7c4adacf5c3c32be5ebb3df to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
bisectable6
sub foo($bar, &func) { func($bar) }; foo([^3], &max);
Bisecting: 3459 revisions left to test after this (roughly 12 steps)
[a08e9530181ea08d4d79b44bb77c18e678cbc4b0] Fix .comb(Int) failing to work on Cool
»»»»» Testing a08e9530181ea08d4d79b44bb77c18e678cbc4b0
»»»»» Script output:
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 40d5b27d523102e28ddef2e6210045b9e57cc42e
»»»»» Script output:
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 6ac2b15cfac01ca90aceea967b040ea7fd2d7afc
»»»»» Script output:
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 00797d07ef90c3f17cc75e628de8293e475f1165
»»»»» Script output:
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 0c1191f6f8e6b53116259cee9208dfe970170a4e
»»»»» Script output:
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing f330d7fc44d76258e651c9114360d08f929b25b9
»»»»» Script output:
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 7a15d9de27c97d59483c3a3740565716a3b5cd93
»»»»» Script output:
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 62242caafedf502ee7c2612db66693392a9f9a22
»»»»» Script output:
Type check failed in binding to parameter '&func'; expected Callable but got Sub+{is-pure} (Sub+{is-pure}.new)
in sub foo at /tmp/X50xRNM7dL line 1
in block <unit> at /tmp/X50xRNM7dL line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 1, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing b69bc8b9a934a0f0ed6bff1ad53714726a143ab8
»»»»» Script output:
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 16b57af54949044d67cc56ad5f2b4bc97d0fc6c9
»»»»» Script output:
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 63775474db3c85f2f6a66b2f2f863eb79c1b5191
»»»»» Script output:
Type check failed in binding to parameter '&func'; expected Callable but got Sub+{is-pure} (Sub+{is-pure}.new)
in sub foo at /tmp/X50xRNM7dL line 1
in block <unit> at /tmp/X50xRNM7dL line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 1, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 182b7ea5730240c0d81f0307063c79779a3c82aa
»»»»» Script output:
Type check failed in binding to parameter '&func'; expected Callable but got Sub+{is-pure} (Sub+{is-pure}.new)
in sub foo at /tmp/X50xRNM7dL line 1
in block <unit> at /tmp/X50xRNM7dL line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 1, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 55bc053c56bd54717fe39c627a539373aba83013
»»»»» Script output:
Type check failed in binding to parameter '&func'; expected Callable but got Sub+{is-pure} (Sub+{is-pure}.new)
in sub foo at /tmp/X50xRNM7dL line 1
in block <unit> at /tmp/X50xRNM7dL line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 1, exit code on “old” revision is 0
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
55bc053c56bd54717fe39c627a539373aba83013 is the first new commit
commit 55bc053c56bd54717fe39c627a539373aba83013
Author: Elizabeth Mattijsen <liz@wenzperl.nl>
Date: Tue Feb 20 14:33:01 2018 +0100
Make only sub min/min/minmax multi's
:040000 040000 8e3b2e1be63ca3241920dd6f329a7aaf99d0da57 28842dfd165afe0b476467f2d221a6932e61d5d7 M src
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment