Last active
December 21, 2015 15:19
-
-
Save adam3smith/6326169 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
about | |
above | |
across | |
afore | |
after | |
against | |
along | |
alongside | |
amid | |
amidst | |
among | |
amongst | |
anenst | |
apropos | |
apud | |
around | |
as | |
aside | |
astride | |
at | |
athwart | |
atop | |
barring | |
before | |
behind | |
below | |
beneath | |
beside | |
besides | |
between | |
beyond | |
but | |
by | |
circa | |
despite | |
down | |
during | |
except | |
for | |
forenenst | |
from | |
given | |
in | |
inside | |
into | |
lest | |
like | |
modulo | |
near | |
next | |
notwithstanding | |
of | |
off | |
on | |
onto | |
out | |
over | |
per | |
plus | |
pro | |
qua | |
sans | |
since | |
than | |
through | |
thru | |
throughout | |
thruout | |
till | |
to | |
toward | |
towards | |
under | |
underneath | |
until | |
unto | |
up | |
upon | |
versus | |
vs. | |
v. | |
via | |
vis-à-vis | |
with | |
within | |
without | |
according to | |
ahead of | |
apart from | |
as regards | |
back to | |
because of | |
close to | |
due to | |
except for | |
far from | |
instead of | |
outside of | |
prior to | |
pursuant to | |
rather than | |
regardless of | |
such as | |
that of | |
where as | |
@adam3smith, can you take a look at Frank's comment?
In addition, should we prune the list from two-word entries that exist as separate one-word entries? E.g. we have "up to" as well as "up" and "to", so the former seems redundant. Same goes for "on to", "next to", "near to", etc.
It does look redundant. I can't see any harm in removing those two-word terms.
Sorry, I apparently don't get notifications for these. The list is only prepositions - the other terms should definitely still be included. I agree, we should prune redundant two-word prepositions. I can take a look.
@adam3smith, I think you missed "except for". Rest looks good.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Comparing with the existing list of stop-words in citeproc-js, we also have these:
The stuff after the first nine has been added in response to user requests, so those should stay unless there are complaints.
Are the first nine okay to include?