Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@alex000kim
Created February 2, 2025 15:57
Show Gist options
  • Save alex000kim/4a6fd0ed1752fec253da046d2866477d to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save alex000kim/4a6fd0ed1752fec253da046d2866477d to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
openai-o3-mini-tariff-response

Question:

The US has imposed 25% tariffs on Canada and Canada is retaliating. Build a model on what goods will experience the highest price increases in both Canada and the US.

Thinking part of the response:


Constructing a model to identify goods with the highest price increases due to tariffs involves assessing inelastic imports, political sensitivity, and regional variations.

Analyzing key sectors

I’m gathering info on a conceptual model that examines tariff rates, price elasticity, substitution effects, and pass-through rates, focusing on industries like autos and agriculture.

Analyzing trade dynamics, Canadian retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods will likely cause price hikes in Canada, mirroring U.S. tariffs on Canadian imports.

Identifying key goods for price hikes includes low elasticity imports, high consumption shares, and tariff-inelastic necessities, with consideration of softwood lumber or steel and aluminum disputes.

Mapping the sectors

I’m piecing together sectors like automobiles, agricultural products, and energy to spot goods with likely price hikes. Considering uniform tariffs and Canada's retaliation.

Assessing price implications

I’m examining how elasticities affect tariff impacts. Goods with inelastic demand or limited substitutes experience significant price hikes when tariffs are introduced. This approach clarifies market dynamics.

Identifying key sectors

I’m focusing on sectors with limited substitutes and inadequate domestic supply, crucial for pinpointing potential price hikes under current or hypothetical tariff scenarios.

Mapping price impacts

Considering goods with few substitutes or limited domestic production, using supply-demand equations to predict price hikes. This approach highlights sectors prone to significant cost increases.

Examining key sectors

I’m mapping out goods with inelastic demand and limited domestic substitutes, like softwood lumber and automotive parts, to identify sectors likely to face the highest price increases under tariffs.

Pinpointing cost impacts

Interestingly enough, goods like raw materials, intermediate items, and high transportation-cost products with limited domestic substitutes are likely to face notable price increases under tariffs.

Analyzing tariff impacts

Taking a closer look at goods with low elasticity and high import dependency, like in the US and Canada, reveals sectors likely to experience significant price increases due to tariffs.

Examining specific sectors

I'm focusing on sectors like raw materials and automotive parts in the US, and agricultural goods in Canada, which are likely to see significant price increases due to tariffs.

Analyzing tariff impacts

OK, let me see. Sectors like raw materials, automotive parts, and agricultural goods in Canada are getting hit by significant price hikes due to tariffs. Transportation costs? They’re adding to the trouble.

Tracking price shifts

I’m piecing together that sectors like raw materials and automotive parts are seeing notable price hikes due to tariffs, especially when domestic alternatives are scarce or costly.

Taking a closer look

Analyzing sectors with high transportation costs and significant import shares to see how tariffs are likely driving up prices, leading to serious inflationary effects.

Examining equilibrium shifts

I’m pulling together supply and demand functions to map out how tariffs are changing equilibrium prices and driving price increases, especially for goods with high import dependence.

Noticing patterns

OK, so I’m thinking about how tariffs translate into higher domestic prices, especially for non-differentiated imports and goods with limited local alternatives or inelastic demand.

Tracking trade dynamics

Noticing how US and Canadian tariffs are impacting maple syrup and softwood lumber in the US, while Canada is focusing on agricultural products and automotive parts from the US.

Tracking price shifts

I'm noting that goods with 100% import penetration will face the highest price increases due to full tariff pass-through, potentially offset by consumer shifts to domestic alternatives.

Crafting a simplified model

I’m developing a price change model for US and Canadian markets, focusing on imported goods without domestic alternatives and accounting for substitution elasticity and import share.

Spotting key price shifts

I'm thinking goods with high import content and inelastic demand will likely see the biggest price jumps in the US and Canada. Additional factors could also come into play.

Considering broader impacts

I'm exploring how tariffs might trigger inflation and affect various sectors differently, factoring in pass-through effects on intermediate goods and sector variability. This leads me to consider a comprehensive analysis.

Crafting a structured approach

I’m working on a structured model to identify goods with the highest price increases in Canada and the US, covering assumptions, model structure, price increase derivation, affected goods, sector analysis, and a conclusion.

Assessing tariff impact

I'm calculating how a 25% tariff raises the import price by 25%. For fully imported goods, this means a 25% price increase, while partially imported goods see a price rise proportional to their import share.

Analyzing key sectors

I'm mapping out goods with high import reliance and consistent demand in the US and Canada, including softwood lumber, natural resources, dairy, agricultural products, and automobiles.

Evaluating goods

Analyzing the US and Canada's high import and inelastic demand goods, including U.S. agricultural products, electronics, and vehicles, along with Canadian products with limited domestic substitutes.

Assessing impact

I'm examining how Canadian retaliatory tariffs will affect U.S. imports, focusing on high import penetration and inelastic demand products like softwood lumber, natural resources, energy, dairy, agricultural goods, and some manufactured items.

Analyzing cascading effects

I'm examining how tariffs on imported goods might increase the final price more than 25%, especially when these goods are intermediate inputs in production.


Final response:

Below is one way to “build a model” – a simplified, partial‐equilibrium framework – to help think through which goods are likely to see the steepest consumer price increases when the U.S. and Canada impose 25% tariffs on each other’s products. In practice, real‐world outcomes would depend on many factors (including substitution, supply chain adjustments, and firm strategies), but the following framework can serve as a starting point.


1. Modeling Framework and Key Assumptions

A. Market Structure and Tariff Pass–Through

  • Imported Goods Only vs. Mixed Supply:
    Assume that in each market (U.S. or Canada) some goods are imported and have little or no domestic production. For these “pure imports,” a tariff generally raises the cost by nearly the full tariff rate. For goods that are produced both domestically and abroad, the effect on consumer prices will depend on the share of imports.

  • Demand Elasticity:
    When demand is relatively inelastic (i.e. consumers are not very responsive to price changes), most or all of the tariff will be passed on to the consumer. For goods with a more elastic demand, firms might absorb some of the tariff (or consumers may switch to substitutes), reducing the price change.

  • Supply Elasticity and Competition:
    If domestic supply is not easily expanded (inelastic) or if few substitutes exist, the price increase from the tariff will be larger.

B. Basic Pricing Equation

For a given good ( i ), assume the world (or export) price is ( P_i^w ). With a tariff rate ( t = 25% ), a “purely imported” product will cost in the importing country roughly: [ P_i^{\text{domestic}} \approx P_i^w \times (1 + t) = 1.25 , P_i^w. ] If a fraction ( \lambda_i ) (with ( 0 \le \lambda_i \le 1 )) of the market is supplied by imports, then the average domestic price might be approximated as: [ P_i^{\text{avg}} \approx \lambda_i , (1 + t) , P_i^w + (1 - \lambda_i) , P_i^{\text{domestic, local}}, ] where ( P_i^{\text{domestic, local}} ) is the price of the domestic substitute. In the extreme case ( \lambda_i = 1 ) (i.e. the good is entirely imported), the full 25% tariff is “visible” to consumers.

C. Intermediate Goods and Cascading Effects

In many industries, goods serve as intermediate inputs. A tariff on an imported intermediate good can increase the cost of the final product by more than the initial tariff percentage (if the intermediate good is used repeatedly in the production process). For simplicity, we will focus on final consumer goods in this model—but note that multi-stage production can amplify effects.


2. Identifying the Goods Likely to See the Highest Price Increases

Given the framework, the key factors that determine a high tariff-induced price increase are:

  1. High Import Penetration (( \lambda_i ) near 1):
    Goods that are not or barely produced domestically (in the importing country) will have little competition to keep prices down.

    • Example (U.S.): Some Canadian specialty products, such as certain grades of softwood lumber or maple products, might be almost entirely imported if U.S. domestic production is limited.
    • Example (Canada): Certain U.S. agricultural products (or industrial inputs) that are not produced in Canada.
  2. Inelastic Demand:
    Products for which consumers have few close substitutes (necessities, highly specialized inputs, or products with strong brand identity) will experience nearly full pass-through of the tariff.

    • In the U.S., if consumers depend on a particular Canadian product for construction or manufacturing (e.g., specific grades of lumber or specialized chemicals) and there are no ready domestic substitutes, the price rise can be close to the full 25%.
    • Similarly in Canada, if U.S. products in key sectors (for example, certain components in automotive manufacturing or agricultural chemicals) are critical and have few domestic alternatives, prices will jump substantially.
  3. Limited Substitution and Supply-Side Flexibility:
    Where domestic producers cannot quickly scale up to replace imports, the market must bear the tariff cost.


3. A Simplified Mathematical Representation

For a good ( i ) in an importing country, assume the following:

  • World Price: ( P_i^w )
  • Tariff Rate: ( t = 0.25 )
  • Import Share: ( \lambda_i )
  • Domestic Supply Price (if available): ( P_i^d ) (assumed roughly constant in the short run)

Then the consumer price can be approximated by: [ P_i^{\text{consumer}} \approx \lambda_i , P_i^w(1+t) + (1 - \lambda_i) , P_i^d. ] The relative price increase is then roughly: [ \frac{\Delta P_i}{P_i^{\text{baseline}}} \approx \lambda_i , t, ] if we assume that domestic prices ( P_i^d ) remain largely unchanged. (More refined models would incorporate demand and supply elasticities, but this simple formulation illustrates the main idea.)

  • Goods with (\lambda_i \approx 1): Full 25% increase (or more if there are additional supply-chain effects).
  • Goods with (\lambda_i < 1): A smaller increase, diluted by the availability of a domestic alternative.

4. Sectoral Examples: Which Goods May See the Highest Increases?

Based on the above reasoning:

In the U.S.:

  • Canadian Softwood Lumber and Wood Products:
    Often a nearly pure import in certain construction segments, meaning a 25% tariff could largely translate to a similar increase in consumer prices (or construction costs).

  • Specialty Canadian Agricultural or Food Products:
    For example, maple syrup or other products with strong geographic identification may have little domestic substitute.

  • Industrial Inputs or Chemicals:
    If the U.S. relies on Canadian inputs that are not easily substituted, these inputs may see a full tariff pass-through, which could then raise the cost of downstream manufactured goods.

In Canada:

  • U.S. Agricultural Products:
    Certain fruits, grains, or processed foods that Canada imports in large quantities might face steep increases, particularly if domestic production is limited.

  • Automotive Components and Machinery:
    If these components are primarily sourced from the U.S. and are essential for Canadian manufacturing, they could experience near–full pass-through of the tariff.

  • High-Tech or Specialized Industrial Inputs:
    Goods that are imported from the U.S. without close Canadian substitutes will also see high price increases.


5. Additional Considerations and Caveats

  • Substitution Effects:
    Consumers and businesses may switch to domestic or third–country alternatives, which could mitigate price increases. Our model above represents a “first–order” effect before substitution fully sets in.

  • Supply Chain Complexity:
    Many products have multi–stage production processes. A tariff on an intermediate product can cascade through to final prices, sometimes resulting in an increase larger than 25%.

  • Market Adjustments:
    Over time, both domestic producers and consumers may adjust behavior (through increased domestic production, altered consumption patterns, or even price negotiations), which could alter the immediate impact estimated by this static model.

  • Political and Strategic Responses:
    Firms might engage in tariff avoidance or other strategies that our simple model does not capture.


Conclusion

Using this partial–equilibrium approach, the model suggests that the highest consumer price increases in both the U.S. and Canada will likely occur in those goods that:

  • Are nearly 100% imported (i.e. very high import penetration),
  • Have relatively inelastic demand (few substitutes or necessities),
  • And, in many cases, serve as critical inputs in production processes (where cascading effects can occur).

Thus, one would expect:

  • In the U.S.: Imported Canadian goods like certain grades of softwood lumber, specialized agricultural/food items, and perhaps key industrial inputs.
  • In Canada: U.S. imports such as certain agricultural products, automotive components, and specialized industrial or technological inputs.

This framework offers a way to think about the transmission of tariffs to consumer prices. Of course, empirical data (such as import penetration rates, price elasticities, and supply-chain details) would be needed to refine the model and produce quantitative forecasts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment