Factor | Matrix | Chat-SE |
---|---|---|
Client Platforms |
|
|
Bot Support | First-class - officially supported | Tenuous; allowed but at the whims of SE, and hackish |
Basic text formatting | Standard Markdown | Ghetto Chat Markdown (mostly the same for the very basics) |
Strikethrough | <del>strike</del> |
---strike--- |
Avatars | Upload one via client | Gravatar or upload |
Gateway Support | Overall: Many exist & well supported
|
No official; a few hackish ones that semi-work |
Hosting model | Decentralized | Centralized |
E2E encryption | Supported (optional) | Unsupported (except via OTR over the top, but nobody's attempted that AFAIK) |
Private messaging | Supported | Unsupported |
Stars | No | Yes |
Direct msg reply | Kind-of | Yes |
Image embedding | Ought to work but having issues | Basic oneboxing where possible + enhanced oneboxing for trusted sites |
Image uploading | Supported | Supported |
Voice chats | Yes | No |
Invite-only rooms | Yes | No/Hackish (not really what it's designed for) |
Depends on one company/individual to keep going | No | Yes |
Stability | Beta, rough setup | Stable/highly available |
Speed | Adequate for our needs | Excellent |
Anti-spam/troll Mod tools | Good (banning, etc.) | Excellent |
Terms of Use / Code of Conduct | Liberal - very open | Increasingly restrictive |
Comparison to Discord/Slack/Gitter (Overall) | Mostly similar but lacking in some features / ease of setup; decentralization makes it less likely to be censored later | Pretty dissimilar in most ways. Lacks a lot of features but also has unique features they don't, like stars |
Risks | OSS might become unmaintained and lead to bitrot | Mods might gallery / delete our room |
Deletion |
|
|
Msg Editing | None |
|
chat.SE vs. Matrix feature comparison
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment