Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

Created June 11, 2015 21:08
  • Star 0 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
Star You must be signed in to star a gist
Save anonymous/b6a92d04494ca1a0dd9d to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
[16:47:13] <edwarnicke> Is this helium or lithium ?
[16:47:26] <flaviof> edwarnicke: you will like this: its Lithium!
[16:47:49] <edwarnicke> flaviof: I do like that :)
[16:47:52] <mestery> lothium
[16:47:54] <mestery> yeah
[16:47:56] <flaviof> lol
[16:47:57] <edwarnicke> flaviof: Needed to know so I could look at the right code
[16:48:07] <flaviof> edwarnicke: ack.
[16:48:24] <edwarnicke> flaviof: mestery So question: is it the RC0 build? (note: there are no wrong answers here, just trying to figure out where to look ;) )
[16:49:01] <flaviof> edwarnicke: it is last night build. the logic to grab what build to use is here:
[16:49:05] flaviof digging
[16:49:24] <mestery> yes, it's a snapshot build
[16:49:25] <mestery> the very latest
[16:49:32] <mestery> as of something like 30 minutes ago
[16:49:40] <edwarnicke> mestery: Cool :)
[16:49:46] <edwarnicke> mestery: flaviof Now I know where to look :)
[16:49:47] <flaviof> edwarnicke: https://github.com/stackforge/networking-odl/blob/master/devstack/release.lithium-snapshot-0.3.0
[16:53:12] <edwarnicke> mestery: flaviof OK... I know a little more
[16:53:41] <edwarnicke> mestery: flaviof Basically, the Exception is because the aaa system has not authentication service at the time it was asked to authenticate something
[16:53:54] <edwarnicke> mestery: You said that you had REST calls that went through before the failure?
[16:53:59] mestery shakes his fist at the ^@#$!@# aaa system
[16:54:33] <mestery> edwarnicke: I *thought* that, but on closer look, it wasn't the case.
[16:54:46] <flaviof> edwarnicke: is this an issue in the realm of.... if you waited longer it would have worked; or this is borked and aaa is gone fishing for good?
[16:54:48] <edwarnicke> mestery: Good to know, because that would be less mysterious ;)
[16:55:03] <edwarnicke> flaviof: So given what mestery just said, yes, if you waited longer it should work
[16:55:08] <mestery> :(
[16:55:11] <edwarnicke> flaviof: mestery Not to imply its not a bug
[16:55:23] <mestery> We're already waiting 6 minutes I guess I can increase the timeout more
[16:55:25] <edwarnicke> flaviof: mestery Because you shouldn't *have* to wait
[16:55:27] <flaviof> *sigh*
[16:55:40] <edwarnicke> mestery: I figured out something that should make a lot of this better in general
[16:55:51] <flaviof> Kyle it is already waithing 5 mins?
[16:55:59] <edwarnicke> mestery: Basically... ODL should be building in a way that it doesn't need to fetch bundles via mvn at startup
[16:56:03] <mestery> flaviof: 6 minutes
[16:56:03] <mestery> :(
[16:56:05] <edwarnicke> mestery: But that is broken
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment