bisectable6

query

old=2016.11 say 2**-999999

result

Bisecting: 142 revisions left to test after this (roughly 7 steps)
[ab3a59c393e620654b788d89eed818b13b7e92a1] Make permutations/combinations die instead of fail
»»»»» Testing ab3a59c393e620654b788d89eed818b13b7e92a1
»»»»» Script output:
Numeric overflow
  in block <unit> at /tmp/Z__RbXNMjd line 1

Actually thrown at:
  in block <unit> at /tmp/Z__RbXNMjd line 1

»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 1, exit code on “old” revision is 1
»»»»» Note that on “old” revision exit code is normally 0, you are probably trying to find when something was fixed
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 5558710da69e12c3fe1eb44bf217db4e47705da8
»»»»» Script output:
0
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 1
»»»»» Note that on “old” revision exit code is normally 0, you are probably trying to find when something was fixed
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing bfe4abb14a3e5baf1704436e87ddcf65cf77e567
»»»»» Script output:
0
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 1
»»»»» Note that on “old” revision exit code is normally 0, you are probably trying to find when something was fixed
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 08ccbbbd768adf430b36180dad4640bb14eeeba0
»»»»» Script output:
0
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 1
»»»»» Note that on “old” revision exit code is normally 0, you are probably trying to find when something was fixed
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing f367e4edc189e090b83e81d5314f18bc438ccd39
»»»»» Script output:
0
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 1
»»»»» Note that on “old” revision exit code is normally 0, you are probably trying to find when something was fixed
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 4fd6e94825335d25554409797c4743987a1a8ecd
»»»»» Script output:
Numeric overflow
  in block <unit> at /tmp/Z__RbXNMjd line 1

Actually thrown at:
  in block <unit> at /tmp/Z__RbXNMjd line 1

»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 1, exit code on “old” revision is 1
»»»»» Note that on “old” revision exit code is normally 0, you are probably trying to find when something was fixed
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 5bacb0573ce9458c2e6a7bcc1bc9a5f2cce18233
»»»»» Script output:
Numeric overflow
  in block <unit> at /tmp/Z__RbXNMjd line 1

Actually thrown at:
  in block <unit> at /tmp/Z__RbXNMjd line 1

»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 1, exit code on “old” revision is 1
»»»»» Note that on “old” revision exit code is normally 0, you are probably trying to find when something was fixed
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 3836012bffe3902cd834643005cbdf458760d066
»»»»» Script output:
0
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 1
»»»»» Note that on “old” revision exit code is normally 0, you are probably trying to find when something was fixed
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing cf0525408eb68e97b958d8e0908d342eaf095ded
»»»»» Script output:
0
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 1
»»»»» Note that on “old” revision exit code is normally 0, you are probably trying to find when something was fixed
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
cf0525408eb68e97b958d8e0908d342eaf095ded is the first new commit
commit cf0525408eb68e97b958d8e0908d342eaf095ded
Author: Pawel Murias <pawelmurias@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed Dec 7 18:29:38 2016 +0100

    Stop relying on a bug in infix:<**>(Int, Int).

:040000 040000 0230776350bd2d16ce2239c1a3b8fb7ee7226360 53889535790793ea5c73c9a0277977b49997d9ec M	src