bisectable6

query

old=2022.04 new=2022.06 class :: does Sequence does Positional { has Lock $.l .= new; method iterator { die "called iterator" } }.new

result

Bisecting: 44 revisions left to test after this (roughly 6 steps)
[6fc2e6c66ce89ea68bf120c4a1947a6e1f20d5a4] Try to resolve races in CURFS
»»»»» Testing 6fc2e6c66ce89ea68bf120c4a1947a6e1f20d5a4
»»»»» Script output:

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Script exit signal: 11 (SIGSEGV)
»»»»» Bisecting by exit signal
»»»»» Current exit signal is 11 (SIGSEGV), exit signal on “old” revision is 0 (None)
»»»»» If exit signal is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing bfad9bd66ecec944b0837956c425811e6aaf2d1c
»»»»» Script output:

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit signal
»»»»» Current exit signal is 0 (None), exit signal on “old” revision is 0 (None)
»»»»» If exit signal is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing a84e16849d8da4a74104ffdb5e7f875c14a5b086
»»»»» Script output:

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Script exit signal: 11 (SIGSEGV)
»»»»» Bisecting by exit signal
»»»»» Current exit signal is 11 (SIGSEGV), exit signal on “old” revision is 0 (None)
»»»»» If exit signal is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing b01c493a509a51b2a27b83ce964ebadbe9b66619
»»»»» Script output:

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Script exit signal: 11 (SIGSEGV)
»»»»» Bisecting by exit signal
»»»»» Current exit signal is 11 (SIGSEGV), exit signal on “old” revision is 0 (None)
»»»»» If exit signal is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 92ee0a74964cc5e43ebbb74f6574d5df07edcb2b
»»»»» Script output:

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Script exit signal: 11 (SIGSEGV)
»»»»» Bisecting by exit signal
»»»»» Current exit signal is 11 (SIGSEGV), exit signal on “old” revision is 0 (None)
»»»»» If exit signal is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 83ea647498961e7154241d317daa0b90929d9597
»»»»» Script output:

»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Script exit signal: 11 (SIGSEGV)
»»»»» Bisecting by exit signal
»»»»» Current exit signal is 11 (SIGSEGV), exit signal on “old” revision is 0 (None)
»»»»» If exit signal is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
83ea647498961e7154241d317daa0b90929d9597 is the first new commit
commit 83ea647498961e7154241d317daa0b90929d9597
Author: Vadim Belman <vrurg@lflat.org>
Date:   Tue Apr 26 18:04:48 2022 -0400

    Fix for positional argument binding
    
    Postiional bind failover was previously only taken into account for
    `Positional` arguments, literally. In other words, it did work for
    `Positional $a` or `@a`, but not for, say, `List`.
    
    Fix for #4864

:040000 040000 531c02e0542e6859e869caedfb8ca7f9a4252e7e b1e0a0c8e9bbdc19eeff2116d6a8756045f7c358 M	src