Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

View dhimmel's full-sized avatar
🎯
Focusing

Daniel Himmelstein dhimmel

🎯
Focusing
View GitHub Profile
@dhimmel
dhimmel / openalex-metagraph.drawio
Last active October 14, 2022 14:33
Open Alex Metagraph source for https://app.diagrams.net/
<mxfile host="Electron" modified="2022-01-11T22:24:44.620Z" agent="5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) draw.io/16.1.2 Chrome/96.0.4664.55 Electron/16.0.5 Safari/537.36" etag="3d_x8ajHgV-OkkuHk2Cl" version="16.1.2" type="device"><diagram id="CRBQrBPZslJF9kaArlf7" name="Page-1">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
@dhimmel
dhimmel / ubuntu-quarter-screen-issue.md
Created May 4, 2022 01:38
Diagnosing the Ubuntu top left quarter display issue
@dhimmel
dhimmel / disease-v2-review.md
Last active March 2, 2022 02:26
DISEASES v2 Review by Daniel Himmelstein

DISEASES 2.0 Review

Reference

DISEASES 2.0: a weekly updated database of disease–gene associations from text mining and data integration
Dhouha Grissa, Alexander Junge, Tudor I Oprea, Lars Juhl Jensen
bioRxiv (2021-12-09) https://doi.org/gn3fj4
DOI: 10.1101/2021.12.07.471296

The webapp and latest downloads are available at . Version 1 is described in the 2015 publication.

@dhimmel
dhimmel / benevolent-ai-metagraph-data-sources.drawio
Last active August 14, 2023 14:59
Metagraph of the Benevolant AI knowledge graph from Paliwal et al 2020
<mxfile host="app.diagrams.net" modified="2021-06-08T17:05:33.560Z" agent="5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/90.0.4430.85 Safari/537.36" etag="oN2ExXKtZoTKyfjxyag6" version="14.7.6" type="device"><diagram id="CpBVq6cUYyMfxSufbEmF" name="Page-1">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
@dhimmel
dhimmel / tiga-review.md
Created December 1, 2020 17:53
Review of TIGA (Target illumination GWAS analytics) preprint v1
@dhimmel
dhimmel / sciscore-manuscript-review.md
Last active May 4, 2020 21:43
Review of the "Rigor and Transparency Index" manuscript (https://doi.org/dkg6)

Daniel Himmelstein's review of preprint v2

Review of version 2 of the following preprint:

Rigor and Transparency Index, a new metric of quality for assessing biological and medical science methods
Joe Menke, Martijn Roelandse, Burak Ozyurt, Maryann Martone, Anita Bandrowski
bioRxiv (2020-01-18) https://doi.org/dkg6
DOI: 10.1101/2020.01.15.908111

The study introduces an automated method called SciScore to detect whether an article's methods section mentions any of 15 categories, such as a consent statement or an organism. These metrics are combined to create a single score for each article called the "Rigor and Transparency Index". The authors applied the method to the PubMed Central Open Access subset with over 1 million articles to identify trends in the level of details provided by method sections.

@dhimmel
dhimmel / hetmech-query-node-pair.ipynb
Created October 23, 2018 21:38
Query relationship between the FTO gene and obesity using hetmech
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
@dhimmel
dhimmel / hetionet-v1.0-metaedge-xswap-stats.tsv
Last active October 2, 2018 15:38
Analytical derivation of the prior XSwap probability of a hetnet edge
metaedge abbreviation n_edges n_connected_source_nodes n_connected_target_nodes n_source_wedges n_target_wedges n_wedges n_valid_xswaps
Anatomy–downregulates–Gene AdG 102240 36 15097 173440264 493897 173934161 5052523519
Anatomy–expresses–Gene AeG 526407 241 18094 2290279787 10749138 2301028925 136250872696
Anatomy–upregulates–Gene AuG 97848 36 15929 149352969 359661 149712630 4637353998
Compound–binds–Gene CbG 11571 1389 1689 104024 476540 580564 66357671
Compound–causes–Side Effect CcSE 138944 1071 5701 16998055 16764774 33762829 9618885267
Compound–downregulates–Gene CdG 21102 734 2880 1683615 291789 1975404 220661247
Compound–palliates–Disease CpD 390 221 50 326 2857 3183 72672
Compound–resembles–Compound CrC 12972 1281 1281 120047 120047 240094 83889812
Compound–treats–Disease CtD 755 387 77 1420 8070 9490 275145
@dhimmel
dhimmel / version-gh-pages.ipynb
Last active February 16, 2018 20:32
Convert Manubot gh-pages to use versioned directories
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
@dhimmel
dhimmel / Q5-other-responses.md
Last active January 4, 2018 01:41
Other responses from "What’s the primary reason you use Sci-Hub" survey question in https://doi.org/gbqq97

Questions

From In survey, most give thumbs-up to pirated papers by John Travis on 2016-05-06 in Science, question 5 was:

What’s the primary reason you use Sci-Hub or other pirated article repositories?

The possible answers were:

  1. I don’t have any access to the papers — 50.97% 5,046
  2. Convenience--It’s easier to use than the authentication systems provided by the publishers or my libraries — 16.90% 1,673