Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@drjwbaker
Last active November 1, 2022 17:17
Show Gist options
  • Select an option

  • Save drjwbaker/9eaf73cafdcbed811177 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

Select an option

Save drjwbaker/9eaf73cafdcbed811177 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
'Digital Data and Artistic Expression', Digital Conversation, British Library, 10 September 2014

##'Digital Data and Artistic Expression', Digital Conversation, British Library, 10 September 2014

Live notes, so an incomplete, partial record of what actually happened.

Tag: bldigital


###Ernest Edmonds

Take about data and movement and the implication of that.

Artist by inclination, CS by accident.

'It is the conversations that data transformation cause that are important from my perspective'

Communication is much more than language - the latter is way up the hierarchy of communication.

Potential in the arts for dealing with digital data to make artworks than span continents. Artwork on one screen in Syndey and another in Belfast.

Transformation of data need not be seen as instant. Art that highlights how data can change over time is important.

Data used to iteratively change cityscapes.

Data can drive interaction.

Artist press the edges. Digital data is a new canvas.

Data offers a new canvas... Artists are always exploring who we are, providing a new way for understanding our world. #bldigital

— Johanna Kieniewicz (@johannakz) September 10, 2014
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

###Michael Takeo Magruder

Work primarily with computational systems. Interest in taking digital artefacts and getting them off the screen, into physical spaces.

Art based on socially relevant real time data - visualising context.

Real time data art of the financial crash - could see the virtual buildings falling down as the stocks crashed - revealing the power of oil, making it tangible, through data art.

Interest in small narratives we can pull from big collections.

Michael Takeo Magruder encouraging us to understand contexts differently through seeing data differently #bldigital

— Katie Eagleton (@fearandsequins) September 10, 2014
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Algorithmic art based on the Snowden releases.

Aim to encourage people to see differently.

Peterborough Museum.


###Julia Freeman

Is data an art material or a medium?

Hacked a vending machine to vend crisps based on live feed of data from the BBC.

Stools that move based on expenditure data. And those spending the money sitting on the stool...

Data as Culture.

Taxomonies of data - 'data' is far from a singular thing.

The Lake - tagged fish, created data from their movements, replayed as viz/sound.

Don't like the phrase 'big data' - focus on live data, subtelty, nature.

Data can be subtle, very soft and small @misslake #bldigital

— Johanna Kieniewicz (@johannakz) September 10, 2014
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Taking real time data from Zooniverse to understand use - 'We Need Us' - abstract presentation of data - launch 3 October.


###Kevin Walker, 'digital Data: terror and wonder'

Digital familiar. Data less so?

Wonder perhaps? Multi-modality certainly. Criticality - artists help us question the sources of data, the meaning of data, the stories behind data.

Data sonification, sculpture, critical interrogation of technology and data @Kevin7 presents fantastic work of @RCAIED course #bldigital

— Johanna Kieniewicz (@johannakz) September 10, 2014
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

How do we represent a quantum partial that is in two states at once but can only be viewed in one state or the other?

Interest in absurd levels of repetition in science and the replication of that - teasing at the rigerous rules, the agents in the system of data creation.

I like the idea of artists as agents in rigorous scientific systems #bldigital

— Johanna Kieniewicz (@johannakz) September 10, 2014
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

###discussion

Worst case scenario interaction for the sake of interaction, because it is cool, et al.

Do we try and make sense of interactive art or should we just experience it? Heightened awareness of audience expertise - always been there, we are just more aware of it.

Interesting issue about audience responses to interactive digital works. Discussion of audiences 'making sense' vs 'experiencing' #bldigital

— Ellie Miles (@ellie__miles) September 10, 2014
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Is there a reduction in deference to art? And is that a bad thing?

Another "I don't like the term 'big data'" -- data not about interacting but doing things that create data --

Interactive art foregroundng how we influence things without realising - eg car emissions and the weather

Can we do art in this space that doesn't need a plug, that isn't technology? No - because everything is technology. Can we do it without the digital network, digital things?

Data as a tool, the same way that language is a tool.

'Influence not interactivity'-thought provoking discussion at Digital Conversation @britishlibrary #bldigital

— Rob J Berry (@RobJBerry) September 10, 2014
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Requirement for human interactivity seems popular. But it can be got around... Subtle better.


Some admin...

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Creative Commons License

Exceptions: embeds from external sources

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment