eledroos

from cStringIO import StringIO
from pdfminer.pdfinterp import PDFResourceManager, PDFPageInterpreter
from pdfminer.converter import TextConverter
from pdfminer.layout import LAParams
from pdfminer.pdfpage import PDFPage
import os
import sys, getopt

def convert(fname, pages=None):
    if not pages:

eledroos

import pandas as pd
import json, requests, logging, pprint


# Setup logging
lfh = logging.FileHandler('civicInfoScript.log')
lfh.setFormatter(logging.Formatter('%(levelname)s %(asctime)s %(message)s'))
log = logging.getLogger('civicInfoScript')
log.setLevel(logging.INFO)
log.addHandler(lfh)

eledroos

Keybase proof

I hereby claim:

• I am eledroos on github.
• I am nassereledroos (https://keybase.io/nassereledroos) on keybase.
• I have a public key ASBvtbo2FqgVT-OgCaUi92birVpNf4_V413hLGwsVei3Two

To claim this, I am signing this object:

eledroos

    // set the dimensions and margins of the graph
var margin = {top: 20, right: 20, bottom: 30, left: 50},
    width = 960 - margin.left - margin.right,
    height = 500 - margin.top - margin.bottom;

// parse the date / time
var parseTime = d3.timeParse("%d-%b-%y");

// set the ranges
var x = d3.scaleTime().range([0, width]);

eledroos

import re
import tweepy
import config
import sys
import datetime
import csv
from tweepy import OAuthHandler
from textblob import TextBlob

class TwitterClient(object):

eledroos

Title: Total Surveillance Is Not What America Signed Up For
Author: The Editorial Board, The New York Times.

It is a federal crime to open a piece of junk mail that’s addressed to someone else. Listening to someone else’s phone call without a court order can also be a federal crime.

The Supreme Court has ruled that the location data served up by mobile phones is also covered by constitutional protections. The government can’t request it without a warrant.

But the private sector doesn’t need a warrant to get hold of your data. There’s little to prevent companies from tracking the precise movements of hundreds of millions of Americans and selling copies of that dataset to anyone who can pay the price.

The incongruity between the robust legal regime around legacy methods of privacy invasion and the paucity of regulation around more comprehensive and intrusive modern technologies has come into sharp relief in an investigation into the location data industry by Times Opinion. The investigation, which builds on