eridal

{
    init: function(elevators, floors) {

        var waiting = [];

        elevators.forEach(function (elevator) {

          elevator.on("idle", function() {
              var i = waiting.length;
              while (i-- > 0) {

eridal

package j2p;

import japa.parser.JavaParser;
import japa.parser.ParseException;
import japa.parser.ast.CompilationUnit;
import japa.parser.ast.ImportDeclaration;
import japa.parser.ast.PackageDeclaration;
import japa.parser.ast.body.BodyDeclaration;
import japa.parser.ast.body.ClassOrInterfaceDeclaration;
import japa.parser.ast.body.FieldDeclaration;

eridal

import java.util.Scanner;

class Java {

  public static void main(String[] args) {

    Scanner s = new Scanner(System.in);

    while (s.hasNextInt()) { // <-- blocking read
      int i = s.nextInt();

eridal

• In the world of open-source development where most of the code is shared, code clarity and readability is important.
• Object-oriented code architecture allows for much higher clarity and readability than procedural one, especially in complex code.
• Clean and eloquent code is easier to review and independently reviewed code is more reliable and secure.
• Code clarity largely influences the code's reusability for other purposes and by other people.
• Consistency in a coding standard allows for cleaner and more comprehensible documentation.
• Although it requires some tedious work, the usage of semantic checks on a massive scale pays off with more reliable code.
• Adapting some of the familiar conventions that are used for method naming, parameter ordering, and method behavior from othe languages is better than making up new ones.
• Unvarying return types with a fixed type for every method is better than varying return types when a value of one type can be mistaken for a value of another type.
• Underscores