Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@fehler
Last active August 29, 2015 14:18
Show Gist options
  • Star 0 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save fehler/4129442621088b847b2f to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save fehler/4129442621088b847b2f to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Explaining figures for a @netmag typography article in issue #268.

The terms ‘number’ and ‘numeral’ are often confused: One is a number, but 1 is a numeral. Added to this, numerals in typography are referred to as ‘figures’. (No one said this would be easy!)

We frequently encounter figures when wrestling with typography: telephone numbers, dates of birth, financial data, fractions… the list goes on. Well designed typefaces include ‘old style’ figures (1234567890) in addition to ‘lining’ figures (1234567890). Lining figures were originally designed to be used in conjunction with capitals; old style (or ‘lowercase’) figures blend in better with text settings given their ascenders (6, 8) and descenders (3, 4, 5, 7, 9).

In addition to old style and lining figures, a thoughtfully designed typeface will include ‘proportional’ and ‘tabular’ figures. Proportional figures, as the name implies, have differing widths (a 1 is narrower than a 9), and are designed to fit together like letters. Tabular figures, on the other hand, are designed for tabular data and designed to be mono-width.

When setting figures within a paragraph of text – a date of birth, for example – old style proportional figures are the ideal choice. When setting numerical data, however – an annual report, for example – lining tabular figures would be a better choice.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment