(by @andrestaltz)
If you prefer to watch video tutorials with live-coding, then check out this series I recorded with the same contents as in this article: Egghead.io - Introduction to Reactive Programming.
(by @andrestaltz)
If you prefer to watch video tutorials with live-coding, then check out this series I recorded with the same contents as in this article: Egghead.io - Introduction to Reactive Programming.
| #!/usr/bin/env ruby -w | |
| # pnginator.rb: pack a .js file into a PNG image with an HTML payload; | |
| # when saved with an .html extension and opened in a browser, the HTML extracts and executes | |
| # the javascript. | |
| # Usage: ruby pnginator.rb input.js output.png.html | |
| # By Gasman <http://matt.west.co.tt/> | |
| # from an original idea by Daeken: http://daeken.com/superpacking-js-demos |
| Today I gave a keynote at ACCU in Oxford. In the midst of it I made two (count them) two statements that I should have known better than to make. I was describing the late '70s, and the way we felt about the C language at the time. My slide said something like: "C was for real men." Emily Bache, whom I know and hold in high regard, spoke up and said "What about women?". And I said something like: "We didn't allow women in those days." It was a dumb crack, and should either not have been said, or should have been followed up with a statement to the effect that that was wrong headed. | |
| The second mistake I made was while describing Cobol. I mentioned Adm. Grace Hopper. I said something like "May she rest in peace." I don't know that any of the words were actually demeaning, but the tone was not as respectful as it should have been to an Admiral in the United State Navy, and one who was so instrumental in our industry; despite what I feel about Cobol. | |
| I am a 59 year old programmer who was brought up |
Spurred by recent events (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8244700), this is a quick set of jotted-down thoughts about the state of "Semantic" Versioning, and why we should be fighting the good fight against it.
For a long time in the history of software, version numbers indicated the relative progress and change in a given piece of software. A major release (1.x.x) was major, a minor release (x.1.x) was minor, and a patch release was just a small patch. You could evaluate a given piece of software by name + version, and get a feeling for how far away version 2.0.1 was from version 2.8.0.
But Semantic Versioning (henceforth, SemVer), as specified at http://semver.org/, changes this to prioritize a mechanistic understanding of a codebase over a human one. Any "breaking" change to the software must be accompanied with a new major version number. It's alright for robots, but bad for us.
SemVer tries to compress a huge amount of information — the nature of the change, the percentage of users that wil
| // http://paulirish.com/2011/requestanimationframe-for-smart-animating/ | |
| // http://my.opera.com/emoller/blog/2011/12/20/requestanimationframe-for-smart-er-animating | |
| // requestAnimationFrame polyfill by Erik Möller. fixes from Paul Irish and Tino Zijdel | |
| // MIT license | |
| (function() { | |
| var lastTime = 0; | |
| var vendors = ['ms', 'moz', 'webkit', 'o']; |
Google Chrome Developers says:
The new WOFF 2.0 Web Font compression format offers a 30% average gain over WOFF 1.0 (up to 50%+ in some cases). WOFF 2.0 is available since Chrome 36 and Opera 23.
Some examples of file size differences: WOFF vs. WOFF2
| brew update | |
| brew versions FORMULA | |
| cd `brew --prefix` | |
| git checkout HASH Library/Formula/FORMULA.rb # use output of "brew versions" | |
| brew install FORMULA | |
| brew switch FORMULA VERSION | |
| git checkout -- Library/Formula/FORMULA.rb # reset formula | |
| ## Example: Using Subversion 1.6.17 | |
| # |
This is now an actual repo: