Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@jdtsmith
Last active December 28, 2022 19:23
Show Gist options
  • Select an option

  • Save jdtsmith/0c35675ec33be1402fab60fe6cbd4d0c to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

Select an option

Save jdtsmith/0c35675ec33be1402fab60fe6cbd4d0c to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Where precisely can Emacs take control of execution to deliver async process output to your filter-function?
(defvar-local still-waiting nil
"Whether we are still waiting for a chunk of process output to complete.")
(defun my-worker-1 (process)
"Do some work and yield to PROCESS output."
(do-some-sensitive-calculation)
(sit-for 1) ; A) output can interrupt me here
(another-sensitive-buffer-manipulation) ; B) what about here?
(my-worker-2 process))
(defun my-worker-2 (process)
"Do some work and communicate with PROCESS."
(heavy-calc1) ; C) can these simple calc-only calls themselves be interrupted?
(heavy-calc2) ; D) how about *between* the two calls?
(process-send-string proc "I'm done!") ; E) presumably right here can be
(my-worker-3)
(while still-waiting
(accept-process-output process 0.1 nil 1) ; F) obviously here
(sit-for 0.02))) ; G) and here
(defun my-worker-3 ()
"Do more work, entirely unrelated to the process."
(do-something-entirely-unrelated-to-the-process)) ; H) but can this function or its internal calls be interrupted?
@minad

minad commented Dec 28, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

And that various emacs internals effectively call "await process_output()" without regard for whether you are prepared to accept it at that moment.

That's not what they do. They start a new local event loop, they are blocking. But yes, if one ensures that no such blocking functions are called, everything should be predictable.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment