The telepathic channelings shared on this Twitter account have been taken from transcriptions of the weekly study and meditation meetings of the Rock Creek Research & Development Laboratories and L/L Research. They are offered in the hope that they may be useful to you. As the Confederation entities always make a point of saying, please use your discrimination and judgment in assessing this material. If something rings true to you, fine. If something does not resonate, please leave it behind, for neither we nor those of the Confederation would wish to be a stumbling block for any.
- Jacques Fuentes' pushodoro.rb
- The Agile Manifesto
- the #noestimates debate (Neil Killick, Vasco Duarte)
- Dan Milstein's No Deadlines For You! Software Dev Without Estimates, Specs or Other Lies blog post
- Uncle Bob's "Rails is not your app" talk (Architecture: The Lost Years)
We know Ra was always very eager for people to get to know themselves. "Know yourself, accept yourself, become the Creator." Most people do not know themselves. They know themselves as they wish to be, but they have not grappled with certain aspects of their shadow side that constitute the rich, fertile field of what the negative entity can use. If you don't know about it, it will be used, and that right quickly. So it's good to know yourself. Ra has always emphasized that.
Carla Rueckert, as interviewed by Gary Bean in Tilting at Windmills
The religious person enjoys a great advantage when it comes to answering the crucial question that hangs over our time like a threat: he has a clear idea of the way his subjective existence is grounded in his relation to “God”. I put the word “God” in quotes in order to indicate that we are dealing with an anthropomorphic idea whose dynamism and symbolism are filtered through the medium of the unconscious psyche. Anyone who wants to can at least draw near to the source of such experiences, no matter whether he believes in God or not. Without this approach it is only in rare cases that we witness those miraculous conversions of which Paul’s Damascus experience is the prototype. That religious experiences exist no longer needs proof. But it will always remain doubtful whether what metaphysics and theology call God and the gods is the real ground of these experiences. The question is idle, actually, and answers itself by reason of the subjectively overwhelming numinosity of the experience. Anyone who has had it
I think in a country when we have it as easy as we do, one of our big dread vectors is boredom. I think little edges of despair and soul-level boredom appear in things like homework or particularly dry classroom stuff. I can remember the incredible soaring relief of when certain teachers would say we were going to watch a movie in grade school and it wasn't just a hedonistic "oh, we're going to have fun"; it was a relief from some terrible burden.
FROM Elizabeth Dudley Cann Kambourian: | |
Regarding the Stadium Controversy: It has been brought to my attention that the Slave Trail Commission, and Mayor Jones are citing the so-called "Kambourian Map" as their "evidence" that there are no pertinent slave trading sites within the proposed footprint of the Stadium. Let me make it perfectly clear: the "Kambourian Map" is one I showed to the Slave Trail Commission in the fall of 2000, as an "idea" of what might be located in Shockoe Bottom. Ralph White asked if he could make a copy of it. I agreed based on his assurance that it would not be shared or used. I made it clear that it was a rough preliminary sketch and was not by any means verified information. | |
In the interim. My map has been used in Slave Trail Publications and god knows what other so called documentation. I have pointed out, many times to various members that the map was not correct, complete or accurate. I refused to allow my map to be used when asked by Mr. White and others. | |
Assorted mistakes |
Dear Sir or Madam, | |
I have continued to read about the project and I have found some problems in the most recent study by Davenport. | |
Please note their first assumption on page 3 of the report. It reads as follows: "All Non-Ballpark (i.e. Retail, Residential, Hotel, Office, Parking, etc.) improvements will be privately financed by the Developer." Underneath this, they repeat, underline, and emphasize their first assumption: "No allowances have been made with respect to development incentives." | |
Their second assumption contains the first mistake made in the compilation of their report. They appear to have misunderstood the 2009 ERA report. Davenport's study states: | |
"In conducting our analysis, Davenport has extrapolated the following assumptions from the original 2009 Era Report: |