| # encoding: utf-8 | |
| import re | |
| import base64 | |
| import socket | |
| import requests.packages.urllib3.connectionpool | |
| try: | |
| from http.client import HTTPConnection, HTTPSConnection |
| $ vi /etc/sysctl.conf | |
| # 系统所有进程一共可以打开的文件数量， 每个套接字也占用一个文件描述字 | |
| fs.file-max = 1491124 | |
| # 系统同时保持TIME_WAIT套接字的最大数目，http 短链接会产生很多 TIME_WAIT 套接字。 | |
| net.ipv4.tcp_max_tw_buckets = 7000 | |
| # 关闭 tcp 来源跟踪 | |
| net.ipv4.conf.default.accept_source_route = 0 | |
| # 缩短套接字处于 TIME_WAIT 的时间， 60s -> 30s | |
| net.ipv4.tcp_fin_timeout = 30 | |
| # 启用 TIME_WAIT 复用，使得结束 TIEM_WAIT 状态的套接字的端口可以立刻被其他套接字使用。 |
Wensheng Wang, 10/1/11
Source: http://blog.wensheng.org/2011/10/performance-of-flask-tornado-gevent-and.html
When choosing a web framework, I pretty much have eyes set on Tornado. But I heard good things about Flask and Gevent. So I tested the performance of each and combinations of the three. I chose something just a little more advanced than a "Hello World" program to write - one that use templates. Here are the codes: