dennisreimann

{-

   This file is a reaction to the article "A small dive into, and rejection of, Elm":
   https://hackernoon.com/a-small-dive-into-and-rejection-of-elm-8217fd5da235#.9w3ml4r6b

   I think constructive criticism is very welcome in the Elm community. Pointing out
   possibilities for documentation improvements, mentioning missing features or ways
   in which the language could evolve etc. are imho a vital part of a good community.

   However, the article above is neither well informed nor constructive. IMHO ranting