leftaroundabout

import Codec.Picture
import qualified Diagrams.Prelude as Dia
import Diagrams.Prelude ((^&))
import qualified Diagrams.Backend.Cairo as Dia

type ℝ = Double

horizContourLine ::
     ((ℝ,ℝ) -> ℝ) -- ^ The topography/height function
  -> (ℝ,ℝ)        -- ^ x-interval on which to render the path

leftaroundabout

import Graphics.Dynamic.Plot.R2
import Data.Function

type Time = Double
type Duration = Time
type RMS = Double

pianoShape :: Duration -> Time -> RMS
pianoShape len t
  | t<0        = 0

leftaroundabout

import Diagrams.Prelude

import Diagrams.Backend.Cairo

import Data.Colour.RGBSpace.HSV
import Data.Colour.SRGB.Linear

import Data.Numbers.Primes

import Control.Monad

leftaroundabout

import Graphics.Dynamic.Plot.R2

import Data.Function

main :: IO ()
main = do
   plotWindow $
      [ plotLatest
         [plotMultiple
           [ signalPlot (fmap (*μ) $ initSignal) & legendName "clean"

leftaroundabout

Well, ultimately music is always subjective. You can't really argue with someone who likes some particular music – they like what they like, and it would be dogmatism to condemn some composition just because it violates the theoretical frameworks^† that you happen to know.

That said, I personally would probably agree with your assessment. I don't think much of music that's just too arbitrary – not because it's bad to violate the standard theory, but because music should have a purpose. This is regardless of whether that purpose can be explained within Common Practice theory, with deliberately violating the common rules, with providing a completely new theoretical framework, or something else.

In other words, “Why it couldn't go there anyways?” is just not the right question to ask to rebut criticism. The right rebuttal is to give a reason why it would go there.

If he picked that particular harmony for a reason – whatever reason – then there's that. In doubt, the reason could simply be “I li

leftaroundabout

{-# LANGUAGE TemplateHaskell, QuasiQuotes       #-}
{-# LANGUAGE DataKinds, KindSignatures          #-}
{-# LANGUAGE ScopedTypeVariables, UnicodeSyntax #-}
{-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies, GADTs                #-}
{-# LANGUAGE ConstraintKinds                    #-}

import Data.Singletons.TH  -- http://hackage.haskell.org/package/singletons-2.7/
import Data.Singletons (sing, Sing, SingI)
import Control.Category.Constrained (Category(..)) -- http://hackage.haskell.org/package/constrained-categories-0.4.1.0

leftaroundabout

{-# LANGUAGE OverloadedLists #-}

import qualified Data.Vector.Unboxed as VU
import Data.Vector.Unboxed (Vector, (!))
import Data.MemoTrie (memo2)
import Graphics.Dynamic.Plot.R2
import Text.Printf

newtype Knots = Knots {getIncreasingKnotsSeq :: Vector Double}

leftaroundabout

import Graphics.Dynamic.Plot.R2
import Data.Semigroup
import Control.Monad (join)

f, g :: Double -> Double
g t = t^2
f t
 | t<0        = -t^2
 | otherwise  = t^2

leftaroundabout

#!/usr/bin/env stack
{- stack --resolver lts-12.0 runghc -}

{-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies, FlexibleInstances #-}
{-# LANGUAGE DataKinds, PolyKinds, KindSignatures, TypeInType #-}
{-# LANGUAGE AllowAmbiguousTypes, TypeApplications, GADTs #-}

import Prelude hiding ((.), id)
import qualified Prelude
import Data.Kind

leftaroundabout

{-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies, FlexibleContexts #-}
import Math.LinearMap.Category
import Data.VectorSpace
import Linear.V3
import Data.AffineSpace
import Control.Arrow
import Data.Semigroup
import qualified Diagrams.Prelude as Dia

import Graphics.Dynamic.Plot.R2