You guys have a clear disinterest in prioritizing moving beyond users who can compile code and use command line. This is evident with the open stance to not maintain a remotely user friendly wallet
It’s an expressed strategy to not focus on wallet UX and ease of use. Part of the rationale is that the dev team has limited resources and that it would be hard to maintain in the long run, and probably would not be very good compared to a more focused third party effort. Part of the rationale is to be non prescriptive in the approach and let competing third parties work out the best UX around a grin wallet GUI. We welcome as many different wallets as possible. It’s still early days for Grin. Whether the strategy is working or not, is up to anyone to say, but we have seen quite a lot of attempts: https://github.com/mimblewimble/docs/wiki/Community-projects#wallets
How many wallets usually exist for 9 month old projects that have their “one, true” main wallet implementation that they are pushing everybody to u