jed

            DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE
                    Version 2, December 2004

 Copyright (C) 2011 Jed Schmidt <http://jed.is>

 Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim or modified
 copies of this license document, and changing it is allowed as long
 as the name is changed.

            DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE

dimpurr

(null) Rules

本群是一个菊苣们的技术闲聊群，聚集着一群和谐友爱齐心协力打击着吾等渣渣的菊苣们(误)。欢迎将觉得有意思的朋友也拉进来，但是务必保持小圈子的和谐友爱氛围，务必保持小圈子的和谐友爱氛围，因为很重要所以说两遍 ……

某些需要先注意一下的小问题

• 如果想拉人，请通知管理员。
• 请不要轻易的 fork (null) 的成员列表。

总之就是要保持聊天记录河蟹

chantastic

Hi Nicholas,

I saw you tweet about JSX yesterday. It seemed like the discussion devolved pretty quickly but I wanted to share our experience over the last year. I understand your concerns. I've made similar remarks about JSX. When we started using it Planning Center, I led the charge to write React without it. I don't imagine I'd have much to say that you haven't considered but, if it's helpful, here's a pattern that changed my opinion:

The idea that "React is the V in MVC" is disingenuous. It's a good pitch but, for many of us, it feels like in invitation to repeat our history of coupled views. In practice, React is the V and the C. Dan Abramov describes the division as Smart and Dumb Components. At our office, we call them stateless and container components (view-controllers if we're Flux). The idea is pretty simple: components can't

hexchain

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
<!-- /etc/fonts/conf.avail/51-noto-color-emoji.conf -->
<fontconfig>
    <selectfont>
        <acceptfont>
            <pattern>
                <patelt name="family"><string>Noto Color Emoji</string></patelt>
            </pattern>
        </acceptfont>