Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

Making Progress Under Uncertainty in SMT Solving, Research, and Life

Abstract

SAT and Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) solvers have many important applications in PL, including verification, testing, type checking and inference, and program analysis – but they are often a mysterious black box to their users, even when those users are PL researchers with lots of solver experience! This talk will be partly a tutorial introduction to the inner workings of SAT and SMT solvers, and partly an extended analogy to navigating life as a researcher: making decisions when you have only incomplete information to go on, learning from decisions that turned out to be bad, and determining when to give up and when to try again. I’ll also highlight a variety of papers in this year’s POPL program that make use of SAT and SMT solving, and discuss why I think it’s worthwhile to learn about solver internals.

Outline

  • Introduction
  • Self-intro
module Main where
import Data.IORef
data Counter = Counter { x :: IORef Int }
makeCounter :: Int -> IO Counter
makeCounter i = do iref <- newIORef i
return (Counter iref)
@lkuper
lkuper / blog.diff
Created December 29, 2017 03:48
Revision history of one of my blog posts.
$ git log -p --word-diff 2015-12-29-refactoring-as-a-way-to-understand-code.markdown | cat
commit 698f4140d1f141b339731f8fe8c984137f93880e
Author: Lindsey Kuper <lindsey@composition.al>
Date: Fri Jun 9 14:00:31 2017 -0700
Tweak a bunch of tags, mostly!
diff --git a/source/_posts/2015-12-29-refactoring-as-a-way-to-understand-code.markdown b/source/_posts/2015-12-29-refactoring-as-a-way-to-understand-code.markdown
index 8cafa552c1..e3ccd2b267 100644
--- a/source/_posts/2015-12-29-refactoring-as-a-way-to-understand-code.markdown
t = 0.0, t/dt = 0.0, mod(t/dt, 10) = 0.0
t = 0.0001, t/dt = 1.0, mod(t/dt, 10) = 1.0
t = 0.0002, t/dt = 2.0, mod(t/dt, 10) = 2.0
t = 0.0003, t/dt = 2.9999999999999996, mod(t/dt, 10) = 2.9999999999999996
t = 0.0004, t/dt = 4.0, mod(t/dt, 10) = 4.0
t = 0.0005, t/dt = 5.0, mod(t/dt, 10) = 5.0
t = 0.0006, t/dt = 5.999999999999999, mod(t/dt, 10) = 5.999999999999999
t = 0.0007, t/dt = 7.0, mod(t/dt, 10) = 7.0
t = 0.0008, t/dt = 8.0, mod(t/dt, 10) = 8.0
t = 0.0009, t/dt = 9.0, mod(t/dt, 10) = 9.0
@lkuper
lkuper / gist:902730b0dd9e2ee4e499c1beda748fc1
Created October 13, 2016 17:51
My .aspell.en.pws file as of October 13, 2016
lvars
LVar's
LVars
elseif
EuroSys
tuples
Karpinski
Blandy's
multi
Amr
julia> foo = 3
3
julia> function test(a::Type{Val{foo}}) return foo end
test (generic function with 2 methods)
julia> test(Val{foo})
3
julia> foo = 4
@lkuper
lkuper / bulk_email.rb
Created July 19, 2016 05:51
Tiny script for sending bulk emails via Gmail.
# Dependencies: `gem install ruby-gmail`
require 'gmail'
require 'csv'
email_subject = "subject line"
email_body = File.open("email.txt", "rb").read
username = "username"
#lang racket
;; A solver for the following puzzle:
;; Given 5 integers a, b, c, d, and e,
;; find an expression that combines a, b, c, and d with arithmetic operations (+, -, *, and /) to get e.
(require srfi/1)
(define ops '(+ - * /))
;; permutations: takes a list and returns a list of lists,
;; where each is a permutation of the original.
;; I got the idea for the algorithm from http://stackoverflow.com/a/23718676/415518.
(define (permutations ls)
(cond
;; base cases: lists of length 0, 1, or 2
[(null? ls) '(())]
[(equal? (length ls) 1) `((,(first ls)))]
[(equal? (length ls) 2)
`((,(first ls) ,(second ls))
@lkuper
lkuper / 17.scm
Last active October 27, 2019 17:17
;; This code is AWFUL and I'm sorry.
;; idea from http://stackoverflow.com/a/23718676/415518
;; This works after I added the `concat`!
(define permutations
(lambda (ls)
(cond
[(null? ls) '(())]
[(equal? (length ls) 1) `((,(car ls)))]
[(equal? (length ls) 2)