Navigation Menu

Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@maning
Last active December 22, 2018 10:49
Show Gist options
  • Star 0 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save maning/61d9a1962454159b33ffa046bdeb092c to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save maning/61d9a1962454159b33ffa046bdeb092c to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

grab-review

I did a quick pass of Grab mapping team edits in Thailand. The intent is to understand whether there are egregious edits made by the team in the context of the recent TechCrunch article published last week. This is a quick evalutaion and does not capture the full picture. But it provides general trend. This evaluation is purely arm-chair and I did not do any ground truthing.

Process

Notes

Changeset too big - edits crossing several countries or too large to investigate. This type of editing should be avoided. Make small changesets as much as possible.

  • 65553833, 65441984, 65364684, 65036912

Deletions by the same team - previously added roads (service) were deleted afterwards. Why did Grab team do this. In most cases the previous addtions were valid based on satellite imagery (either Bing, DigitalGlobe, ESRI and Mapbox).

  • Examples - 65032561, 65031974, 65031327, 65018021, 65005873, 65004829, 65004986, 65004568, 65002609, 65001005, 64964666, 64963644, 64961749, 64960325, 64957490

JOSM validation - common editing errors found within the changeset bbox. No error was found most roads that were flagged were due to missing names.

  • 64315343

  • 64313144

  • 64284700

  • 64283020

  • 64282915

  • 64281932

  • 64280172

  • 64279419

  • 64278626

  • 64218076

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment