naps62

upstream foobar {
server unix:///var/www/foobar/shared/sockets/puma.sock;
}

server {
  server_name www.foobar.com;
  return 301 $scheme://foobar.com$request_uri;
}

server {

naps62

AllCops:
  Include:
    - '**/Rakefile'
    - '**/config.ru'
  Exclude:
    - 'db/**/*'
    - 'config/**/*'
    - 'script/**/*'
    - 'bin/**/*'
    - 'vendor/**/*'

naps62

language: ruby
rvm:
  - 2.0.0

naps62

var GameObject = function(name) {
  this.name = name || "gameObject";
  this.components = [];
}

GameObject.prototype.update = function() {
  this.components.map(function(component) {
    if (!!component.update) {
      component.update();
    }

naps62

Topics

• MVC
• Routes
• Convention over Configuration
• How to create a Rails project
• Directory Structure
• Route helpers
• (*) sprockets (manifest files, minification, etc, Scss)
• (*) views (view helpers

naps62

#!/usr/bin/env ruby

require 'bitly'
require 'clipboard'
require 'uri'

username = ENV['BITLY_USERNAME']
api_key  = ENV['BITLY_API_KEY']
url      = ARGV.shift

naps62

# We want to have something this:

# app/models/user.rb
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
  include Presenter::Mixin
end

# or for more customization
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
  presented

naps62

require "contracts"

C = Contracts

module ModuleWithContracts
  def self.included(base)
    base.extend ClassMethods
  end

  module ClassMethods

naps62

#!/bin/sh

# grab screen width and height
resolution=$(xrandr | grep '*' | head -n1 | tr -s ' ' | cut -d ' ' -f2)
resolution_width=$(echo $resolution | cut -d 'x' -f1)
resolution_height=$(echo $resolution | cut -d 'x' -f2)

# overlay will have full width, 80px height
width=$resolution_width
height=80

naps62

Overall, I like the path where this is headed, but I have some big concerns with the current functionality. here's a quick list:

There's no easy & quick way for me to tell what's left for me to review

See the screenshot below, taken a couple of days ago:

This is a list of open PRs on a client project. Some were already reviewed by me, other's weren't. For the ones I haven't reviewed, the green check mark also shows up, because our CI was green. There was no way for me to tell which ones I still haven't reviewed without opening each one individually.