- http://stackoverflow.com/questions/804115 (
rebase
vsmerge
). - https://www.atlassian.com/git/tutorials/merging-vs-rebasing (
rebase
vsmerge
) - https://www.atlassian.com/git/tutorials/undoing-changes/ (
reset
vscheckout
vsrevert
) - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2221658 (HEAD^ vs HEAD~) (See
git rev-parse
) - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/292357 (
pull
vsfetch
) - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/39651 (
stash
vsbranch
) - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8358035 (
reset
vscheckout
vsrevert
)
-- show running queries (pre 9.2) | |
SELECT procpid, age(clock_timestamp(), query_start), usename, current_query | |
FROM pg_stat_activity | |
WHERE current_query != '<IDLE>' AND current_query NOT ILIKE '%pg_stat_activity%' | |
ORDER BY query_start desc; | |
-- show running queries (9.2) | |
SELECT pid, age(clock_timestamp(), query_start), usename, query | |
FROM pg_stat_activity | |
WHERE query != '<IDLE>' AND query NOT ILIKE '%pg_stat_activity%' |
Moved to git-repository: https://github.com/denji/awesome-http-benchmark
Located in alphabetical order (not prefer)
- ab – slow and single threaded, written in
C
- apib – most of the features of ApacheBench (
ab
), also designed as a more modern replacement, written inC
- autocannon – fast HTTP/1.1 benchmarking tool written in Node.js
- baloo – Expressive end-to-end HTTP API testing made easy, written in Go (
golang
)
Mute these words in your settings here: https://twitter.com/settings/muted_keywords | |
ActivityTweet | |
generic_activity_highlights | |
generic_activity_momentsbreaking | |
RankedOrganicTweet | |
suggest_activity | |
suggest_activity_feed | |
suggest_activity_highlights | |
suggest_activity_tweet |
I get asked pretty regularly what my opinion is on merge commits vs rebasing vs squashing. I've typed up this response so many times that I've decided to just put it in a gist so I can reference it whenever it comes up again.
I use merge, squash, rebase all situationally. I believe they all have their merits but their usage depends on the context. I think anyone who says any particular strategy is the right answer 100% of the time is wrong, but I think there is considerable acceptable leeway in when you use each. What follows is my personal and professional opinion:
// Live video stream management for HTML5 video. Uses FFMPEG to connect to H.264 camera stream, | |
// Camera stream is remuxed to a MP4 stream for HTML5 video compatibility and segments are recorded for later playback | |
var liveStream = function (req, resp) { // handle each client request by instantiating a new FFMPEG instance | |
// For live streaming, create a fragmented MP4 file with empty moov (no seeking possible). | |
var reqUrl = url.parse(req.url, true) | |
var cameraName = typeof reqUrl.pathname === "string" ? reqUrl.pathname.substring(1) : undefined; | |
if (cameraName) { | |
try { | |
cameraName = decodeURIComponent(cameraName); |
(by @andrestaltz)
If you prefer to watch video tutorials with live-coding, then check out this series I recorded with the same contents as in this article: Egghead.io - Introduction to Reactive Programming.
This gist is out of date and I can no longer help much, as I got rid of my Mac.
Please visit T2 Linux website for more and better information:
This gist is just a compilation of the hard work that others have put in. I'm not a software developer, so if there are any mistakes or better ways of doing things, I'd appreciate any suggestions. Here's a list of the real heroes who made this possible:
<?php | |
/** | |
* This is free and unencumbered software released into the public domain. | |
* | |
* Anyone is free to copy, modify, publish, use, compile, sell, or | |
* distribute this software, either in source code form or as a compiled | |
* binary, for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial, and by any | |
* means. | |
* |