Created
January 26, 2014 14:34
-
-
Save nicktheo59/8633626 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
INSERT INTO `openqi`.`project` (`ID`, `title`, `aims`, `outcomes`, `accepted`, `population`, `populationsize`, `methodtype`, `datastart`, `dataend`, `startdate`, `enddate`, `auditleadID`) VALUES (NULL, 'Management of Shoulder Dislocations in the Emergency Department', 'To determine if patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with dislocated shoulders are managed appropriately according to standards set out by the College of Emergency Medicine (CEM).', 'Initial attempts to manipulate the shoulder within a set time frame were consistent with CEM standards (76% within 2 hours of arrival and 91% within 3 hours, corresponding with guidelines of 75% and 90% respectively). Staff did well to ensure appropriate follow up was documented but didn’t quite meet expected guidelines. Analgesia was always given when required. Standards were not met in many aspects as 75% of arrivals should receive an x-ray within 60 minutes, whereas the true figure was 67%. The name of any sedative used, and the dose and time given was only documented in 75% of cases, short of the 100% expected by the CEM. Post-reduction X-ray result should have been documented in all cases but was only found in 51% of patients notes. Neurovascular status was noted in only 58% of patients within this audit.', '0', 'Emergency Department', 'N/A', 'The patient’s ED documentation and digital radiography on the PACS system were used to assess adherence to the CEM guidelines. In addition to this, documentation of neurovascular status, with particular attention paid to the axillary nerve; was included in this audit.', '2014-01-26', '2014-01-31', '2014-01-26', '2014-02-12', '1'); | |
INSERT INTO `openqi`.`project` (`ID`, `title`, `aims`, `outcomes`, `accepted`, `population`, `populationsize`, `methodtype`, `datastart`, `dataend`, `startdate`, `enddate`, `auditleadID`) VALUES (NULL, 'Uptake of Influenza and Pneumococcal vaccination in inflammatory rheumatic diseases-audit report', '57% of patients surveyed were >65 years of age. 90% of patients were under treatment for Rheumatoid arthritis and 24% of them were from early arthritis clinic. The remaining 10% included spondyloarthropathy, psoriatic arthritis, vasculitis and polymyalgia rheumatica. 36% of patients were on biologics therapy. Methotrexate was the main immunomodulator drug accounting for 88% while the others included steroids and other DMARDS. Influenza vaccine uptake was 94% (nationally 72.4% -HPA/PHE 2008) and Pneumovax uptake was 25% (69% -HPA 2008).', '57% of patients surveyed were >65 years of age. 90% of patients were under treatment for Rheumatoid arthritis and 24% of them were from early arthritis clinic. The remaining 10% included spondyloarthropathy, psoriatic arthritis, vasculitis and polymyalgia rheumatica. 36% of patients were on biologics therapy. Methotrexate was the main immunomodulator drug accounting for 88% while the others included steroids and other DMARDS. Influenza vaccine uptake was 94% (nationally 72.4% -HPA/PHE 2008) and Pneumovax uptake was 25% (69% -HPA 2008).', '0', 'Rheumatology outpatients', '100', '100 consecutive patients attending the Rheumatology outpatient clinics were surveyed by doctors and nurses while reviewing them, during October-November 2012. The survey questions included- the time of vaccination (flu vaccine and pneumovax), frequency, having it repeated.', '2014-01-26', '2014-01-31', '2014-01-26', '2014-02-12', '1'); |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment