peterkeen

                                                                 QUERY PLAN                                                                 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Append  (cost=1124.07..1134.09 rows=201 width=136) (actual time=13.030..13.052 rows=13 loops=1)
   CTE months
     ->  Function Scan on generate_series x  (cost=0.00..25.00 rows=1000 width=4) (actual time=0.042..0.064 rows=12 loops=1)
   CTE monthly_income
     ->  HashAggregate  (cost=293.73..293.74 rows=1 width=42) (actual time=12.623..12.625 rows=10 loops=1)
           ->  Seq Scan on ledger  (cost=0.00..293.52 rows=12 width=42) (actual time=10.223..12.497 rows=27 loops=1)
                 Filter: ((account ~ 'Income:Consulting'::text) AND ((jtags ->> 'Client'::text) IS NOT NULL))
                 Rows Removed by Filter: 2741

peterkeen

if Rails.env.production?
  resp = HTTParty.get(@sale.product.file.url)

  filename = @sale.product.file.url
  send_data resp.body,
    :filename => File.basename(filename),
    :content_type => resp.headers['Content-Type']
else
  filename = File.expand_path(Sale.last.product.file_file_name, Rails.root)
  send_data File.open(@sale.product.file_file_name),

peterkeen

echo "hi there"

peterkeen

This is a first draft of an idea I had in the shower this morning.

Email courses (aka sequences of email autoresponders) can be trivially modeled as finite state machines. Each state is the last email they were sent (or queued to receive) and each transition queues an email to be sent.

This example implementation builds on top of AASM for the state machine and ActsAsTaggableOn to keep track of states. In a production-ready implementation, likely the state machine implementation would be wrapped in a DSL that streamlines the process a little more.

peterkeen

$ dig microsoft.com @4.2.2.2

; <<>> DiG 9.7.6-P1 <<>> microsoft.com @4.2.2.2
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 15309
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:

peterkeen

Hello there! This is a sample post for gist.io, a super-lightweight writing soapbox for hackers.

Now look up. Further. Above the post title. See that grey text with the gist ID?

Now back to me. That grey text is a link! Open that sucker in a new tab to see the source for this post. Also, I'm on a horse.

This is a SUPER major heading

If you peek at it with a web inspector, you'll see that it is a second-level heading. You can use first level headings, but they'll look just like the second level ones, and the gods of the HTML5 outlining algorithm will frown upon you.

peterkeen

MAINTAINER Pete Keen "pete@petekeen.com"

# Use Ubuntu 12.04 as the base image
FROM ubuntu:precise

# Install a bunch of prerequisites
RUN apt-get update
RUN apt-get install -y git-core curl wget libssl1.0.0 python-yaml build-essential libssl-dev

# Install ruby-build

peterkeen

Sequel.migration do
  up do
    create_table(:budget_periods) do
      String :account
      BigDecimal :amount
      Date :from_date
      Date :to_date
    end

    create_or_replace_view :budget_months, "select xtn_month, account, amount from (select distinct xtn_month from accounts_months) x cross join budget_periods where xtn_month between budget_periods.from_date and (coalesce(budget_periods.to_date, now()::date))"

peterkeen

Subject: Re: [pdxruby] Re: Complex return value anti-pattern?
From: Ward Cunningham <ward.cunningham@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 08:23:26 -0800

Pair programming is often misunderstood.

To understand pairing one must examine the world views of programmers. For 
many (perhaps all programmers historically) programming is difficult and re
quires skill and concentration to be successful. For others, and here we fi
nd roots in dynamic languages, programming is easy but requires imagination

peterkeen

 /^(?:Expenses:(Cable|Utils))/
    * $account                                    -0.5
    * Assets:Receivable:GF                         0.5

= /^Expenses:Rent$/
    * $account                                 -0.2968
    * Assets:Receivable:GF                      0.2968