Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

Last active Dec 21, 2016
What would you like to do?
What if python have parens in function calls optional where possible?
def some(a, b, c):
print a, b, c
def foo(a, b):
return a, b
def bar():
print 'bar'
#simple case, no ambiguity
a = some 'a' 'b' 'c'
# Function call inside function call. We have ambiguity.
# No ambiguity if function application have highest priority.
# This will behave like a = some(foo, a, b, c)
a = some foo a b c
# want this to to behave like some(foo(a, b), c)
# just add parenthesis
a = some foo(a, b) c
# or
a = some (foo a b) c
# what if function has no arguments?
# The solution is very easy, just behave like normal python
# treat this like a refernce to a function
# if you want a call function with no arguments just do this
# args and kwargs
a = ('a', 'b', 'c')
# no ambiguity, no reason for this not to work
some *a
# nor this although I'm not sure I like that
some a='a' c='c' b=b
# and while we're on it, why not make all functions curried?
# if not all arguments have been passed to a function yet with
# parentheis less syntax make it curried
s = some 'a' 'b'
s 'c'
# prints 'a b c'
# in case of ambiguity just act like normal python
s = some 'a' 'b' 'c'
# result in printing 'a b c', s = None
# no need for clumsy
s = partial(some, 'a')
s = partial(some, 'b')
# o
map (some 'a' 'b') ('1', '2', '3')
#prints (a b 1) (a b 2) (a b 3)
# this ambiguous, because right now python allows whitespaces in akward places
# map (partial(some, 'a', 'b'), ('1', '2', '3'))
# but that's not conforms with python format
# and I don't see any benefits from that
# also there is no ambiguity if this kind of usage of parenthesis
# would be allowed only with function call without parenthesis
Copy link

purpleP commented Dec 21, 2016

If you haven't used Haskell you probably wouldn't like the idea. But I don't care.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment