Created
February 7, 2017 00:20
-
-
Save pygy/b3077bf79976441b54878a082ed07f5e to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| <!doctype html> | |
| <title>XRegExp fast-fake-y benchmarks</title> | |
| <table><tr><td> | |
| <div id="log-after">Testing XRegExp 3.1.1-fast-fake-y.<br>Sit back and relax. This might take a while.<br><br>Constructor with short pattern:<br>XRegExp with pattern cache flush x 88,916 ops/sec ±2.24% (82 runs sampled)<br>XRegExp x 834,869 ops/sec ±1.08% (81 runs sampled)<br>XRegExp.cache x 38,821,522 ops/sec ±1.93% (82 runs sampled)<br>RegExp x 5,654,331 ops/sec ±1.68% (81 runs sampled)<br>Fastest is XRegExp.cache<br><br>Constructor with medium pattern:<br>XRegExp with pattern cache flush x 32,278 ops/sec ±1.20% (83 runs sampled)<br>XRegExp x 856,503 ops/sec ±1.48% (79 runs sampled)<br>XRegExp.cache x 38,742,523 ops/sec ±0.66% (82 runs sampled)<br>RegExp x 5,679,163 ops/sec ±2.44% (80 runs sampled)<br>Fastest is XRegExp.cache<br><br>Constructor with long pattern:<br>XRegExp with pattern cache flush x 1,211 ops/sec ±1.01% (80 runs sampled)<br>XRegExp x 484,537 ops/sec ±0.98% (81 runs sampled)<br>XRegExp.cache x 38,776,122 ops/sec ±0.64% (81 runs sampled)<br>RegExp x 1,046,763 ops/sec ±1.46% (84 runs sampled)<br>Fastest is XRegExp.cache<br><br>Constructor with x flag, whitespace, and comments:<br>XRegExp with pattern cache flush x 77,967 ops/sec ±1.05% (84 runs sampled)<br>XRegExp x 436,507 ops/sec ±2.18% (78 runs sampled)<br>XRegExp.cache x 37,747,528 ops/sec ±1.67% (82 runs sampled)<br>Fastest is XRegExp.cache<br><br>exec:<br>Native exec x 80,448 ops/sec ±0.64% (83 runs sampled)<br>Shimmed exec x 78,835 ops/sec ±0.84% (80 runs sampled)<br>XRegExp.exec x 79,084 ops/sec ±1.22% (82 runs sampled)<br>Fastest is Native exec,XRegExp.exec<br><br>exec with 200000 different strings:<br>Native exec x 76,339 ops/sec ±1.51% (80 runs sampled)<br>Shimmed exec x 80,302 ops/sec ±0.69% (81 runs sampled)<br>XRegExp.exec x 79,858 ops/sec ±0.67% (84 runs sampled)<br>Fastest is Shimmed exec,XRegExp.exec<br><br>Sticky exec with 200000 different strings:<br>Native exec x 80,445 ops/sec ±0.66% (84 runs sampled)<br>Shimmed exec x 80,255 ops/sec ±0.77% (82 runs sampled)<br>XRegExp.exec x 1,807,394 ops/sec ±0.83% (83 runs sampled)<br>Fastest is XRegExp.exec<br><br>Iteration with a nonglobal regex:<br>replace with callback x 28,936 ops/sec ±1.18% (79 runs sampled)<br>while/exec x 50,278 ops/sec ±2.67% (80 runs sampled)<br>while/XRegExp.exec x 40,676 ops/sec ±0.96% (83 runs sampled)<br>XRegExp.forEach x 35,703 ops/sec ±2.65% (78 runs sampled)<br>Fastest is while/exec<br><br>Regex object type:<br>RegExp object x 98,977 ops/sec ±0.76% (84 runs sampled)<br>XRegExp object x 97,285 ops/sec ±1.21% (82 runs sampled)<br>Fastest is RegExp object,XRegExp object<br><br>Capturing:<br>Numbered capture x 97,813 ops/sec ±0.74% (85 runs sampled)<br>Named capture (one name) x 95,850 ops/sec ±1.07% (81 runs sampled)<br>Named capture (four names) x 76,876 ops/sec ±0.96% (82 runs sampled)<br>Fastest is Numbered capture<br><br>Unicode letter construction:<br>Incomplete set: /[a-z]/i x 82,931 ops/sec ±1.54% (79 runs sampled)<br>BMP only: /\p{L}/ x 86,744 ops/sec ±2.22% (78 runs sampled)<br>Full Unicode: /\p{L}/A x 76,593 ops/sec ±3.91% (73 runs sampled)<br>Fastest is BMP only: /\p{L}/<br><br>Unicode letter matching:<br>a-z caseless x 210,352 ops/sec ±0.72% (82 runs sampled)<br>\p{L} x 90,013 ops/sec ±1.70% (82 runs sampled)<br>\p{L} astral x 13,980 ops/sec ±1.87% (78 runs sampled)<br>Fastest is a-z caseless<br><br>Unicode word matching:<br>a-z caseless x 84,678 ops/sec ±0.88% (84 runs sampled)<br>\p{L} x 26,579 ops/sec ±0.91% (82 runs sampled)<br>\p{L} astral x 3,170 ops/sec ±0.70% (82 runs sampled)<br>Fastest is a-z caseless<br><br>Finished. ☺</div> | |
| </td><td> | |
| <div id="log">Testing XRegExp 3.1.1-next.<br>Sit back and relax. This might take a while.<br><br>Constructor with short pattern:<br>XRegExp with pattern cache flush x 61,242 ops/sec ±7.22% (58 runs sampled)<br>XRegExp x 363,671 ops/sec ±3.70% (67 runs sampled)<br>XRegExp.cache x 36,638,533 ops/sec ±1.85% (70 runs sampled)<br>RegExp x 1,093,123 ops/sec ±2.45% (74 runs sampled)<br>Fastest is XRegExp.cache<br><br>Constructor with medium pattern:<br>XRegExp with pattern cache flush x 32,622 ops/sec ±2.64% (72 runs sampled)<br>XRegExp x 294,758 ops/sec ±2.03% (73 runs sampled)<br>XRegExp.cache x 36,729,360 ops/sec ±2.02% (72 runs sampled)<br>RegExp x 608,069 ops/sec ±2.22% (71 runs sampled)<br>Fastest is XRegExp.cache<br><br>Constructor with long pattern:<br>XRegExp with pattern cache flush x 1,523 ops/sec ±1.03% (76 runs sampled)<br>XRegExp x 73,230 ops/sec ±2.42% (70 runs sampled)<br>XRegExp.cache x 38,266,778 ops/sec ±0.87% (78 runs sampled)<br>RegExp x 84,099 ops/sec ±1.53% (76 runs sampled)<br>Fastest is XRegExp.cache<br><br>Constructor with x flag, whitespace, and comments:<br>XRegExp with pattern cache flush x 75,103 ops/sec ±1.31% (73 runs sampled)<br>XRegExp x 282,276 ops/sec ±2.80% (73 runs sampled)<br>XRegExp.cache x 34,972,939 ops/sec ±3.18% (69 runs sampled)<br>Fastest is XRegExp.cache<br><br>exec:<br>Native exec x 78,870 ops/sec ±1.12% (81 runs sampled)<br>Shimmed exec x 78,755 ops/sec ±0.65% (84 runs sampled)<br>XRegExp.exec x 78,950 ops/sec ±0.88% (81 runs sampled)<br>Fastest is XRegExp.exec,Shimmed exec,Native exec<br><br>exec with 200000 different strings:<br>Native exec x 78,312 ops/sec ±1.23% (81 runs sampled)<br>Shimmed exec x 79,168 ops/sec ±0.79% (81 runs sampled)<br>XRegExp.exec x 79,050 ops/sec ±0.72% (81 runs sampled)<br>Fastest is Shimmed exec,XRegExp.exec,Native exec<br><br>Sticky exec with 200000 different strings:<br>Native exec x 79,729 ops/sec ±0.69% (82 runs sampled)<br>Shimmed exec x 79,183 ops/sec ±0.76% (81 runs sampled)<br>XRegExp.exec x 79,968 ops/sec ±0.81% (81 runs sampled)<br>Fastest is XRegExp.exec,Native exec,Shimmed exec<br><br>Iteration with a nonglobal regex:<br>replace with callback x 27,795 ops/sec ±0.81% (82 runs sampled)<br>while/exec x 50,836 ops/sec ±2.55% (78 runs sampled)<br>while/XRegExp.exec x 40,830 ops/sec ±0.70% (81 runs sampled)<br>XRegExp.forEach x 33,478 ops/sec ±2.14% (74 runs sampled)<br>Fastest is while/exec<br><br>Regex object type:<br>RegExp object x 98,341 ops/sec ±0.72% (83 runs sampled)<br>XRegExp object x 96,449 ops/sec ±1.30% (79 runs sampled)<br>Fastest is RegExp object,XRegExp object<br><br>Capturing:<br>Numbered capture x 97,005 ops/sec ±0.95% (78 runs sampled)<br>Named capture (one name) x 95,668 ops/sec ±1.11% (82 runs sampled)<br>Named capture (four names) x 79,571 ops/sec ±0.90% (82 runs sampled)<br>Fastest is Numbered capture,Named capture (one name)<br><br>Unicode letter construction:<br>Incomplete set: /[a-z]/i x 95,038 ops/sec ±2.00% (79 runs sampled)<br>BMP only: /\p{L}/ x 93,437 ops/sec ±1.29% (81 runs sampled)<br>Full Unicode: /\p{L}/A x 95,982 ops/sec ±1.76% (81 runs sampled)<br>Fastest is Full Unicode: /\p{L}/A,Incomplete set: /[a-z]/i<br><br>Unicode letter matching:<br>a-z caseless x 214,699 ops/sec ±0.71% (83 runs sampled)<br>\p{L} x 96,087 ops/sec ±0.73% (85 runs sampled)<br>\p{L} astral x 14,646 ops/sec ±0.77% (83 runs sampled)<br>Fastest is a-z caseless<br><br>Unicode word matching:<br>a-z caseless x 87,168 ops/sec ±0.69% (82 runs sampled)<br>\p{L} x 27,299 ops/sec ±0.94% (84 runs sampled)<br>\p{L} astral x 3,405 ops/sec ±1.08% (80 runs sampled)<br>Fastest is a-z caseless<br><br>Finished. ☺</div> | |
| </tr></table> |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment