Created
May 28, 2020 11:32
-
-
Save steveharoz/d63d66527b654a839b055939642d9feb to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
VR research - correlation between female participant proportion vs simulator sickness
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
library(tidyverse) | |
# Mind the Gap:The Underrepresentation of Female Participants and Authors in Virtual Reality Research | |
# Tabitha C. Peck,Laura E. Sockol, and Sarah M. Hancock | |
# Table 3 | |
data = read_csv( | |
"Study,N,CohensD,CI.Low,CI.Hi,p,SAMD,FemaleParticipants | |
Arafat et al. [4],16,0.42,0.19,0.65,<.001,−.07,81% | |
Ariza et al. [5],18,0.12,-0.09,0.33,0.263,−.68,22% | |
Bolling et al. [9],12,3.5,2.82,4.17,<.001,4.771,33% | |
Bolte & Lappe [10],10,0.45,0.16,0.74,0.002,−.01,50% | |
Bruder et al. [16],15,0.32,0.09,0.55,0.007,−.26,13% | |
Bruder et al. [17],16,0.32,0.1,0.55,0.005,−.26,69% | |
Freitag et al. User Study [27],54,0.48,0.35,0.6,<.001,0.07,17% | |
Hayashi et al. Experiment 1 [31],16,1.06,0.79,1.34,<.001,1.15,44% | |
Kim et al. [40],15,0.09,-0.13,0.32,0.418,−.66,0% | |
Kruse et al. [43],20,0.34,0.14,0.54,0.001,−.25,35% | |
Langbehn et al. Confirmatory Study [44],15,0.19,-0.03,0.42,0.096,−.48,13% | |
Latoschik et al. EP3 [45],45,-0.05,-0.18,0.08,0.458,−1.61,71% | |
Lee et al. [47],26,0.1,-0.07,0.27,0.263,−.88,46% | |
MacQuarrie & Steed [53],31,0.39,0.23,0.56,<.001,−.18,58% | |
Roth et al. [68],125,0.14,0.07,0.22,<.001,−1.56,33% | |
Schatzschneider et al. [71],21,1.37,1.1,1.63,<.001,2.01,38% | |
Schmitz et al. Experiment 3 [72],9,0.06,-0.23,0.36,0.67,−.52,22% | |
Soyka et al. [75],50,0.16,0.03,0.28,0.013,−1.02,50% | |
\"Wang, Wu et al. [81]\",16,0.61,0.37,0.85,<.001,0.29,25% | |
\"Wang, Zhao et al. [82]\",32,0.68,0.51,0.86,<.001,0.62,19% | |
Zhang et al. Study 1 [87],15,0.46,0.22,0.7,<.001,0.01,13% | |
Zhang et al. Study 2 [87],15,0.42,0.18,0.65,0.001,−.08,27%") | |
# fix rounding of proportions | |
data = data %>% mutate(WomenProportion = as.numeric(gsub("[\\%,]", "", FemaleParticipants)) / 100) | |
data = data %>% mutate(WomenN = round(N * WomenProportion), WomenProportion = WomenN / N) | |
# weighted correlation | |
iterate = function() { | |
# sample with replacement | |
temp = data %>% sample_n(n(), replace = T) | |
# weighted correlation | |
temp = cov.wt(temp %>% select(CohensD, WomenProportion), temp$N)$cov | |
# scale covariance matrix to correlation matrix | |
temp = cov2cor(V = temp) | |
# return the correlation | |
temp[1,2] | |
} | |
# bootstrap | |
boot_samples = replicate(10000, iterate(), simplify = T) | |
CI95 = boot_samples %>% | |
quantile(c(0.025, 0.975)) %>% | |
round(3) %>% | |
paste(collapse = ", ") | |
ggplot(tibble(Correlation = boot_samples)) + | |
aes(x = Correlation) + | |
geom_histogram() + | |
geom_vline(color = "red", xintercept = 0) + | |
theme_minimal(20) + | |
labs(title = paste0("Correlation 95% CI: [", CI95, "]")) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment