Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

Show Gist options
  • Select an option

  • Save suchowan/5c2f1ca3cfb79b3abb8ae40bbf3a2a5f to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

Select an option

Save suchowan/5c2f1ca3cfb79b3abb8ae40bbf3a2a5f to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Add parity1997 digest: dimensional rearrangement and Ω₂ visualization

Parity1997 — A method for rearranging the dimensions of electromagnetic quantities

A study on visualizing the solid angle Ω₂ and reorganizing electromagnetic quantities into a symmetric diagram.


1. Purpose of the Study

The original aim of parity1997 was:

  • to visualize the total solid angle of a sphere Ω₂, and
  • to obtain a bird’s‑eye view of how electromagnetic quantities are positioned with respect to rational and unrational units.

This was a dimensional‑analysis exercise, not a modification of Maxwell’s equations.


2. Key Insight: A Symmetric Arrangement Emerges

During the analysis, it was found that by:

  • explicitly including Ω₂ in dimensional expressions, and
  • introducing the characteristic impedance of vacuum $Z_P$ as a dimensional operator,

the major electromagnetic quantities fall naturally into a highly symmetric arrangement.

This symmetry was not the initial goal—it emerged unexpectedly and became the central educational result of the paper.


3. Figure 1 — Symmetric Placement of Electromagnetic Quantities

Relationships among the dimensions of electromagnetic quantitie

Figure 1 shows:

  • electric and magnetic quantities
  • arranged in parallel, symmetric positions
  • connected through solid angle and impedance
  • clarifying the structural relationships among
    • field strengths (E, H)
    • potentials (V, V_m)
    • fluxes (Φ, Ψ)
    • densities (B, D, ρ, j)

This diagram is the conceptual heart of parity1997.


4. Figure 2 — Geometric Interpretation of Magnetic Potential

Explanation of magnetic potential

Figure 2 provides the intuitive breakthrough:

  • A viewpoint observes a current loop.
  • The magnetic potential corresponds to the solid angle subtended by the loop.
  • This makes Ω₂ a natural geometric quantity.
  • It explains why magnetic potential and electric potential appear in symmetric positions in Figure 1.

This is the “Aha!” moment of the paper.


5. What the Paper Does Not Claim

To avoid misunderstanding:

  • Eliminating ε₀ or μ₀ was not the purpose.
    Their disappearance is a by‑product of rewriting dimensions using solid angle(Ω₂) and impedance($Z_P$).

  • The system is not a reduction of MKSA.
    MKSA is 4‑dimensional; the proposed MKSΩ₂ $Z_P$ framework is 5‑dimensional.
    It is a rearrangement, not a contraction.

  • All formulas remain mathematically equivalent to SI.
    Only the dimensional expression is rewritten.


6. Educational Value

Parity1997 provides:

  • a clearer conceptual map of electromagnetic quantities
  • a geometric interpretation of magnetic potential
  • a symmetric arrangement that aids teaching and understanding
  • a way to see electric and magnetic quantities as parallel structures

The diagrams—not the algebra—are the main contribution.


7. Reference

Original paper: parity1997 (1997).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment