Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@thisismattmiller
Last active September 23, 2017 17:21
  • Star 0 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
Star You must be signed in to star a gist
Save thisismattmiller/1667c1f1442dbfb6b58949587d018b77 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
anti-repeal-example.json
{"count":5171,"text":"I support Strong Net Neutrality backed by Title 2 oversight of ISPs.","repeal":"N"}
{"count":5910,"text":"Ajit Pai! I support strong net neutrality backed by Title II oversight of ISPs! Don't mess with it!","repeal":"N"}
{"count":6251,"text":"I specifically support strong net neutrality backed by Title II oversight of ISPs.","repeal":"N"}
{"count":7704,"text":"I support Net Neutrality backed by Title II oversite of Internet Service Providers.","repeal":"N"}
{"count":10886,"text":"I support strong Net Neutrality backed by Title II oversight of ISPs.","repeal":"N"}
{"count":12230,"text":"Net neutrality guarantees a free and open internet. Without it, internet service providers could block or censor websites, or create ÒfastÓ and ÒslowÓ lanes. ISPs can't be allowed to abuse their position, potentially hurting businesses and consumers across the country, and privileging their own content over competitors. Revoking net neutrality by changing the Title II classification of internet access would be bad for people, bad for competition and entrepreneurship, and it's bad for the internet. I fully support keeping the current Title II classification of internet access and keeping the internet free and open.","repeal":"N"}
{"count":16931,"text":"Net Neutrality is not negotiable. ItÕs essential to everything we need in our society and democracy Ñ from educational and economic opportunities to political organizing and dissent. Millions of people fought for over a decade to secure lasting Net Neutrality protections. We will not accept anything less. We urge you to reject any attacks on real Net Neutrality.","repeal":"N"}
{"count":40485,"text":"Net Neutrality is not negotiable. ItÕs essential to everything we need in our society and democracyÑfrom educational and economic opportunities to political organizing and dissent. Millions of people fought for over a decade to secure lasting Net Neutrality protections under Title II. We will not accept anything less. We urge you to reject any attacks on real Net Neutrality.","repeal":"N"}
{"count":96708,"text":"Don't kill net neutrality. We deserve a free and open Internet - one where the flow of data is determined by the interests of Internet users","repeal":"N"}
{"count":101267,"text":"The FCC's Open Internet Rules (net neutrality rules) are extremely important to me. I urge you to protect them.\\r\\n\\r\\nI don't want ISPs to have the power to block websites, slow them down, give some sites an advantage over others, or split the Internet into \"fast lanes\" for companies that pay and \"slow lanes\" for the rest.\\r\\n\\r\\nNow is not the time to let giant ISPs censor what we see and do online.\\r\\n\\r\\nCensorship by ISPs is a serious problem. Comcast has throttled Netflix, AT&T blocked FaceTime, Time Warner Cable throttled the popular game League of Legends, and Verizon admitted it will introduce fast lanes for sites that pay-and slow lanes for everyone else-if the FCC lifts the rules. This hurts consumers and businesses large and small.\\r\\n\\r\\nCourts have made clear that if the FCC ends Title II classification, the FCC must let ISPs offer \"fast lanes\" to websites for a fee.\\r\\n\\r\\nChairman Pai has made clear that he intends to do exactly this.\\r\\n\\r\\nBut if some companies can pay our ISPs to have their content load faster, startups and small businesses that can't pay those fees won't be able to compete. You will kill the open marketplace that has enabled millions of small businesses and created the 5 most valuable companies in America-just to further enrich a few much less valuable cable giants famous for sky-high prices and abysmal customer service.\\r\\n\\r\\nInternet providers will be able to impose a private tax on every sector of the American economy.\\r\\n\\r\\nMoreover, under Chairman Pai's plan, ISPs will be able to make it more difficult to access political speech that they don't like. They'll be able to charge fees for website delivery that would make it harder for blogs, nonprofits, artists, and others who can't pay up to have their voices heard.\\r\\n\\r\\nI'm sending this to the FCC's open proceeding, but I worry that Chairman Pai, a former Verizon lawyer, has made his plans and will ignore me and millions of other Americans.\\r\\n\\r\\nSo I'm also sending this to my members of Congress. Please publicly support the FCC's existing net neutrality rules based on Title II, and denounce Chairman Pai's plans. Do whatever you can to dissuade him.\\r\\n\\r\\nThank you!\\r\\nNicolas Noto","repeal":"N"}
{"count":169375,"text":"Cable and phone companies provide access to the internet. They're telecommunications carriers. They do not (and should not) have the right to censor or slow down my speech and my access to online content. When I use my broadband service, I decide who I communicate with and what information I transmit. I want the FCC to retain the ability to stop my internet service provider from interfering with my communications choices. The courts have already told the FCC that to do this, ISPs must remain under Title II.","repeal":"N"}
{"count":340164,"text":"I strongly oppose Chairman Pai's proposal to reverse net neutrality protections because a free and open internet is vital for our democracy, for our businesses, and for our daily lives. It would give giant internet companies the power to prioritize what we read, watch, and explore online. I won't stand for it. It's about my right to be heard and my right to hear others. I submit my public comment to oppose Chairman Pai's proposal to reverse net neutrality protections.","repeal":"N"}
{"count":530984,"text":"The FCC's Open Internet Rules (net neutrality rules) are extremely important to me. I urge you to protect them.\\n\\nI don't want ISPs to have the power to block websites, slow them down, give some sites an advantage over others, or split the Internet into \"fast lanes\" for companies that pay and \"slow lanes\" for the rest.\\n\\nNow is not the time to let giant ISPs censor what we see and do online.\\n\\nCensorship by ISPs is a serious problem. Comcast has throttled Netflix, AT&T blocked FaceTime, Time Warner Cable throttled the popular game League of Legends, and Verizon admitted it will introduce fast lanes for sites that pay-and slow lanes for everyone else-if the FCC lifts the rules. This hurts consumers and businesses large and small.\\n\\nCourts have made clear that if the FCC ends Title II classification, the FCC must let ISPs offer \"fast lanes\" to websites for a fee.\\n\\nChairman Pai has made clear that he intends to do exactly this.\\n\\nBut if some companies can pay our ISPs to have their content load faster, startups and small businesses that can't pay those fees won't be able to compete. You will kill the open marketplace that has enabled millions of small businesses and created the 5 most valuable companies in America-just to further enrich a few much less valuable cable giants famous for sky-high prices and abysmal customer service.\\n\\nInternet providers will be able to impose a private tax on every sector of the American economy.\\n\\nMoreover, under Chairman Pai's plan, ISPs will be able to make it more difficult to access political speech that they don't like. They'll be able to charge fees for website delivery that would make it harder for blogs, nonprofits, artists, and others who can't pay up to have their voices heard.\\n\\nI'm sending this to the FCC's open proceeding, but I worry that Chairman Pai, a former Verizon lawyer, has made his plans and will ignore me and millions of other Americans.\\n\\nSo I'm also sending this to my members of Congress. Please publicly support the FCC's existing net neutrality rules based on Title II, and denounce Chairman Pai's plans. Do whatever you can to dissuade him.\\n\\nThank you!\\r\\nMarilyn Morris","repeal":"N"}
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment