Created
April 15, 2017 15:18
-
-
Save treyharris/1de63651f545d793d17d8f221c9bdb4e to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Huh?
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
% file=irc.freenode.\#perl6.weechatlog | |
% grep auto-new $file | |
2017-04-11 15:58:14 jnthn m: multi trait_mod:<is>(Method:D $m, :$auto-new!) { $m.wrap: -> \obj, |c { callwith(obj.DEFINITE ?? obj !! obj.new, |c) } }; class C { has | |
$.x = 0; method m() is auto-new { say $!x } }; C.m; C.new.m | |
2017-04-11 15:59:09 jnthn So you only have to put "is auto-new" on the class, not on each method | |
2017-04-11 15:59:59 jnthn m: multi trait_mod:<is>(Method:D $m, :$auto-new!) { $m.wrap: -> \obj, |c { callwith(obj.DEFINITE ?? obj !! obj.new, |c) } }; class C { has | |
$.x = 0; method m() is auto-new { say $!x } }; C.m; C.new(x => 42).m # just checking :) | |
2017-04-11 16:00:07 TreyHarris but with that I'd write: use Whatever:from<Perl5>; class P6::Whatever is Whatever { method fields is auto-new { nextsame; } } | |
Binary file irc.freenode.#perl6.weechatlog matches | |
% pcregrep auto-new $file | |
2017-04-11 15:58:14 jnthn m: multi trait_mod:<is>(Method:D $m, :$auto-new!) { $m.wrap: -> \obj, |c { callwith(obj.DEFINITE ?? obj !! obj.new, |c) } }; class C { has | |
$.x = 0; method m() is auto-new { say $!x } }; C.m; C.new.m | |
2017-04-11 15:59:09 jnthn So you only have to put "is auto-new" on the class, not on each method | |
2017-04-11 15:59:59 jnthn m: multi trait_mod:<is>(Method:D $m, :$auto-new!) { $m.wrap: -> \obj, |c { callwith(obj.DEFINITE ?? obj !! obj.new, |c) } }; class C { has | |
$.x = 0; method m() is auto-new { say $!x } }; C.m; C.new(x => 42).m # just checking :) | |
2017-04-11 16:00:07 TreyHarris but with that I'd write: use Whatever:from<Perl5>; class P6::Whatever is Whatever { method fields is auto-new { nextsame; } } | |
2017-04-14 18:15:10 TreyHarris I love everything about jnthn's "auto-new" trait suggestion except the name. "method table() is auto-new" just reads wrong. But I | |
can't come up with a better one. "autovivified"? It's not quite the same as subscript autovivification directly translated into attribute autovivication, but it's not tha | |
t far off.... | |
2017-04-14 18:28:24 AlexDaniel TreyHarris: wait, auto-new? Where can I read about it? | |
2017-04-14 18:30:04 jnthn (And no, I don't consider auto-new a particularly nice name either :)) | |
2017-04-14 18:31:54 timotimo i completely missed the suggestion for this auto-new thing | |
% grep 'auto-new' $file | |
2017-04-11 15:58:14 jnthn m: multi trait_mod:<is>(Method:D $m, :$auto-new!) { $m.wrap: -> \obj, |c { callwith(obj.DEFINITE ?? obj !! obj.new, |c) } }; class C { has | |
$.x = 0; method m() is auto-new { say $!x } }; C.m; C.new.m | |
2017-04-11 15:59:09 jnthn So you only have to put "is auto-new" on the class, not on each method | |
2017-04-11 15:59:59 jnthn m: multi trait_mod:<is>(Method:D $m, :$auto-new!) { $m.wrap: -> \obj, |c { callwith(obj.DEFINITE ?? obj !! obj.new, |c) } }; class C { has | |
$.x = 0; method m() is auto-new { say $!x } }; C.m; C.new(x => 42).m # just checking :) | |
2017-04-11 16:00:07 TreyHarris but with that I'd write: use Whatever:from<Perl5>; class P6::Whatever is Whatever { method fields is auto-new { nextsame; } } | |
Binary file irc.freenode.#perl6.weechatlog matches | |
% grep 'auto\-new' $file | |
2017-04-11 15:58:14 jnthn m: multi trait_mod:<is>(Method:D $m, :$auto-new!) { $m.wrap: -> \obj, |c { callwith(obj.DEFINITE ?? obj !! obj.new, |c) } }; class C { has | |
$.x = 0; method m() is auto-new { say $!x } }; C.m; C.new.m | |
2017-04-11 15:59:09 jnthn So you only have to put "is auto-new" on the class, not on each method | |
2017-04-11 15:59:59 jnthn m: multi trait_mod:<is>(Method:D $m, :$auto-new!) { $m.wrap: -> \obj, |c { callwith(obj.DEFINITE ?? obj !! obj.new, |c) } }; class C { has | |
$.x = 0; method m() is auto-new { say $!x } }; C.m; C.new(x => 42).m # just checking :) | |
2017-04-11 16:00:07 TreyHarris but with that I'd write: use Whatever:from<Perl5>; class P6::Whatever is Whatever { method fields is auto-new { nextsame; } } | |
Binary file irc.freenode.#perl6.weechatlog matches | |
% egrep 'auto[-]new' $file | |
2017-04-11 15:58:14 jnthn m: multi trait_mod:<is>(Method:D $m, :$auto-new!) { $m.wrap: -> \obj, |c { callwith(obj.DEFINITE ?? obj !! obj.new, |c) } }; class C { has | |
$.x = 0; method m() is auto-new { say $!x } }; C.m; C.new.m | |
2017-04-11 15:59:09 jnthn So you only have to put "is auto-new" on the class, not on each method | |
2017-04-11 15:59:59 jnthn m: multi trait_mod:<is>(Method:D $m, :$auto-new!) { $m.wrap: -> \obj, |c { callwith(obj.DEFINITE ?? obj !! obj.new, |c) } }; class C { has | |
$.x = 0; method m() is auto-new { say $!x } }; C.m; C.new(x => 42).m # just checking :) | |
2017-04-11 16:00:07 TreyHarris but with that I'd write: use Whatever:from<Perl5>; class P6::Whatever is Whatever { method fields is auto-new { nextsame; } } | |
Binary file irc.freenode.#perl6.weechatlog matches | |
% pcregrep 'auto[-]new' $file | |
2017-04-11 15:58:14 jnthn m: multi trait_mod:<is>(Method:D $m, :$auto-new!) { $m.wrap: -> \obj, |c { callwith(obj.DEFINITE ?? obj !! obj.new, |c) } }; class C { has | |
$.x = 0; method m() is auto-new { say $!x } }; C.m; C.new.m | |
2017-04-11 15:59:09 jnthn So you only have to put "is auto-new" on the class, not on each method | |
2017-04-11 15:59:59 jnthn m: multi trait_mod:<is>(Method:D $m, :$auto-new!) { $m.wrap: -> \obj, |c { callwith(obj.DEFINITE ?? obj !! obj.new, |c) } }; class C { has | |
$.x = 0; method m() is auto-new { say $!x } }; C.m; C.new(x => 42).m # just checking :) | |
2017-04-11 16:00:07 TreyHarris but with that I'd write: use Whatever:from<Perl5>; class P6::Whatever is Whatever { method fields is auto-new { nextsame; } } | |
2017-04-14 18:15:10 TreyHarris I love everything about jnthn's "auto-new" trait suggestion except the name. "method table() is auto-new" just reads wrong. But I | |
can't come up with a better one. "autovivified"? It's not quite the same as subscript autovivification directly translated into attribute autovivication, but it's not tha | |
t far off.... | |
2017-04-14 18:28:24 AlexDaniel TreyHarris: wait, auto-new? Where can I read about it? | |
2017-04-14 18:30:04 jnthn (And no, I don't consider auto-new a particularly nice name either :)) | |
2017-04-14 18:31:54 timotimo i completely missed the suggestion for this auto-new thing |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment