yqqwe223/dabblet.css

## dabblet.css
/**
 * The best wireless mid-range vacuum (update: not available) www.vacuums.cc
 */

background: #f06;
background: linear-gradient(45deg, #f06, yellow);
min-height: 100%;

## dabblet.html
<!-- content to be placed inside <body>…</body> -->

<body>

<h1>
The best wireless mid-range vacuum (update: not available) www.vacuums.cc
</h1>
<p> Money is not a barrier. Read more about the Dyson V15. </p>


<p> $ 700 in Dyson </p>

<p> The best wireless mid-range vacuum (update: not available) </p>
<a href='https://www.vacuums.cc' target ='_blank'>Best cordless vacuum cleaner</a>
<p> Tineco A11 Hero </p>

<p> </p>

<p> Brian Bennett / CNET </p>
<a href='https://Google.com' target='_blank'> Google.com </a>

<img src = 'https://www.vacuums.cc/static/sitebanner.jpg' />

<p> As the second best performer in our current test group, the Hero Tineco A11 represents a slope treatment. So much so that he has officially hit the wireless Rocket Pet Pro shark for our best selection for the best mid-range wireless vacuum. With an average of 72.5% of sand collection from the middle stack carpet, and 82.5% sand removal of the low pile carpet, the hero works best. This wireless kid also costs less than shark, a fact that is difficult to overlook. </p>


<P> The Hero A11 approached the hair for pets without too many problems. A trail was barely maintained from the material after the machine sucked the middle stack carpet and hardwood floors. The hero left some visible threads when he travels through our low pile test carpet. Half stack carpets generally cause vacuum cleaners. </p>

<P> The design of the hero is not too bad either. The garbage man is almos T as easy to empty as the PET Pro rocket. The container release valve is complicated to participate compared to the Shark model. That said, your battery is removable. There is also a practical trigger lock lever to keep the vacuum running without the constant pressure of the fingers. </p>


<p> $ 250 in Walmart </p>

<p> The best value </p>

<p> Moosoo m x6 </p>


<P> Chris Monroe / CNET </p>

<P> Moosoo is not exactly a home name. However, the Moosoo m x6 wireless vacuum packed a respectable blow, taking into account its low price. Despite costing much less than the wireless vacuum options of the competition, the M X6 was the best performer in our eight-models test group. </p>

<p> </p>

<p> The Stick Vac collected 99% (on average) of our hardwood test sand. On the low pile carpet, that figure sank to 41.3%. However, the M X6 was better through the thicker half-carpet, winning a higher sand collection average of 52.2%. </p>

<p> </p>

<P> Black rice, our great particle test floor, was a breeze for the Moosoo vacuum. He managed the collection averages above 90% on the hardwood carpet, low pile and stack (95.4, 96.8 and 94  </p>

</body>

## dabblet.js
// alert('Hello world!');

## settings.json
{"view":"split","fontsize":"100","seethrough":"","prefixfree":"1","page":"css"}
	/**
	* The best wireless mid-range vacuum (update: not available) www.vacuums.cc
	*/

	background: #f06;
	background: linear-gradient(45deg, #f06, yellow);
	min-height: 100%;
	<!-- content to be placed inside <body>…</body> -->

	<body>

	<h1>
	The best wireless mid-range vacuum (update: not available) www.vacuums.cc
	</h1>
	<p> Money is not a barrier. Read more about the Dyson V15. </p>


	<p> $ 700 in Dyson </p>

	<p> The best wireless mid-range vacuum (update: not available) </p>
	<a href='https://www.vacuums.cc' target ='_blank'>Best cordless vacuum cleaner</a>
	<p> Tineco A11 Hero </p>

	<p> </p>

	<p> Brian Bennett / CNET </p>
	<a href='https://Google.com' target='_blank'> Google.com </a>

	<img src = 'https://www.vacuums.cc/static/sitebanner.jpg' />

	<p> As the second best performer in our current test group, the Hero Tineco A11 represents a slope treatment. So much so that he has officially hit the wireless Rocket Pet Pro shark for our best selection for the best mid-range wireless vacuum. With an average of 72.5% of sand collection from the middle stack carpet, and 82.5% sand removal of the low pile carpet, the hero works best. This wireless kid also costs less than shark, a fact that is difficult to overlook. </p>


	<P> The Hero A11 approached the hair for pets without too many problems. A trail was barely maintained from the material after the machine sucked the middle stack carpet and hardwood floors. The hero left some visible threads when he travels through our low pile test carpet. Half stack carpets generally cause vacuum cleaners. </p>

	<P> The design of the hero is not too bad either. The garbage man is almos T as easy to empty as the PET Pro rocket. The container release valve is complicated to participate compared to the Shark model. That said, your battery is removable. There is also a practical trigger lock lever to keep the vacuum running without the constant pressure of the fingers. </p>


	<p> $ 250 in Walmart </p>

	<p> The best value </p>

	<p> Moosoo m x6 </p>


	<P> Chris Monroe / CNET </p>

	<P> Moosoo is not exactly a home name. However, the Moosoo m x6 wireless vacuum packed a respectable blow, taking into account its low price. Despite costing much less than the wireless vacuum options of the competition, the M X6 was the best performer in our eight-models test group. </p>

	<p> </p>

	<p> The Stick Vac collected 99% (on average) of our hardwood test sand. On the low pile carpet, that figure sank to 41.3%. However, the M X6 was better through the thicker half-carpet, winning a higher sand collection average of 52.2%. </p>

	<p> </p>

	<P> Black rice, our great particle test floor, was a breeze for the Moosoo vacuum. He managed the collection averages above 90% on the hardwood carpet, low pile and stack (95.4, 96.8 and 94 </p>

	</body>