Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@cowboy
Forked from westonruter/jquery.bindAndCall.js
Created April 30, 2010 12:49
Show Gist options
  • Star 0 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 1 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save cowboy/385142 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save cowboy/385142 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Bind an event handler and fire it immediately
/*!
* bindAndTrigger - v0.1 - 04/30/2010
* http://benalman.com/
*
* http://jsfiddle.net/cowboy/fJnA2/
*/
(function($,undefined){
$.fn.bindAndTrigger = function( all, type, data, callback ) {
if ( typeof all !== 'boolean' ) {
callback = data;
data = type;
type = all;
all = undefined;
}
var first = type.split(' ')[0],
fn = callback || data;
return this
.bind( type, data, callback )
.each(function(){
var event = $.Event( first );
fn.call( event.target = this, event );
return !!all;
});
};
})(jQuery);
@westonruter
Copy link

I forked this at http://gist.github.com/385402

Variable function arguments are pretty painful in JavaScript now, aren't they. I'm playing around with some JavaScript 1.7 destructuring assignments.

@westonruter
Copy link

Instead of the all argument, what about adding support for event.stopImmediatePropagation() being called in the handler? In the each(…) loop you could then return !event.isImmediatePropagationStopped(); instead of return !!all;.

@cowboy
Copy link
Author

cowboy commented Apr 30, 2010

Using arguments is generally slower, and almost always more code.. event.stopImmediatePropagation() also seems cool, but again, more code (and maybe more complex for the end user).

@westonruter
Copy link

While using arguments is slower and uses more code, don't you think it's more readable? Too bad we can't pass named arguments like Python's **kwargs without relying on passing in a single args object:

function demo(all, type, data, callback){
    …
}

Which could then be called by traditionally passing in positional arguments:

demo( true, 'click', null, func );

Or by passing in named arguments in any order:

demo( callback:func, data:null, all:true, type:'click' );

This could easily be supported by the runtime by just positioning the named arguments and potentially injecting undefined. Actually, I think this is better than Python's **kwargs for a finite set of arguments since named arguments in Python always get assigned to the kwargs dictionary as far as I know.

@cowboy
Copy link
Author

cowboy commented Apr 30, 2010

I used to have a lot of fancy arguments stuff in jQuery Object Utils (predecessor to jQuery getObject) but it ended up being a bit gross. In this particular example, it actually simplified things greatly (imo) to use explicit vars.

One or two if statements to shift args around might not feel beautiful, but it minifies really small and executes super-fast.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment