FizzBuzz JavaScript solution

FizzBuzz.js

for (var i=1; i <= 20; i++)
{
    if (i % 15 == 0)
        console.log("FizzBuzz");
    else if (i % 3 == 0)
        console.log("Fizz");
    else if (i % 5 == 0)
        console.log("Buzz");
    else
        console.log(i);
}

//para imprimir en la página web const n= window.prompt("Ingrese un número: "); for(i=1; i<=n; i++) if(i%3==0 && i%5==0){ console.log("FizzBuzz\n"); } else if(i%3==0 && i%5!=0){ console.log("Fizz\n"); } else if(i%3!=0 && i%5==0){ console.log("Buzz\n"); } else{ console.log(i\n); }

Which way would be "better regarded" as a best answer, by using for loops or by using .forEach() and .map()? Or it really does not matter as long as the program executes what is expected of it? Cheers

@iuliaGrig The answer is: It depends.

In this example, it's so simple that it doesn't matter for most intents and purposes. For more complex examples a rule of thumb could be:

• .forEach and .map are generally more readable (even though plenty of people already might disagree). .forEach should be used if there are side-effects to the function (like console.log), .map must be used if you want to create a new list (.forEach doesn't return anything)
• for-loops are generally more performant, even though the difference only really matters for very large lists