Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@myh-st
Created March 16, 2023 07:34
Show Gist options
  • Save myh-st/f00760cfa6c36b9889e06b8dcb547d00 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save myh-st/f00760cfa6c36b9889e06b8dcb547d00 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
comparison table of AWS App Runner, ECS on EC2, and ECS on Fargate

ChatGPT

Sure, here's a comparison table of AWS App Runner, ECS on EC2, and ECS on Fargate that includes the pros and cons of each service:

image

Here are some additional details and some additional pros and cons:

AWS App Runner:

Pros:

  • Quick to set up, manage and deploy
  • Automatic scaling is easy to configure and run
  • Intuitive interface which requires no containerization or deployment knowledge

Cons:

  • Limited control over infrastructure
  • Not suitable for complex, high-availability applications

Amazon ECS on EC2:

Pros:

  • Offers more versatility in terms of customizability and management of container-driven application environments.
  • Better integration with existing build systems, Git repositories and automation tools.
  • More flexibility in its configuration, such as having the ability to move between different ECS clusters.

Cons:

  • Requires more work-on setup and management than the fully managed approach.
  • Configuration can be complex and difficult without proper knowledge around containerization and deployment.

Amazon ECS on Fargate:

Pros:

  • Like App Runner, it is quick to set up and manage without requiring manual intervention
  • Provides extensive hardware support and task isolation capabilities
  • Good for applications that require strict security compliance standards

Cons:

  • Higher costs compared to ECS on EC2.
  • Reduced visibility and control over underlying infrastructure.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment