Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

/gist:09f0b7b9614b48b9ecde Secret

Created March 23, 2012 10:18
Show Gist options
  • Star 0 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save anonymous/09f0b7b9614b48b9ecde to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save anonymous/09f0b7b9614b48b9ecde to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Download ZIP
Raw
gistfile1.txt
==15824== 7 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 5 of 88
==15824== at 0x4023D6E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
==15824== by 0x40BC9E6: proc_v4 (pingCtlTable.c:1440)
==15824== by 0x40B8109: readloop (pingCtlTable.c:1319)
==15824== by 0x40BBBB2: run_ping (pingCtlTable.c:1727)
==15824== by 0x42D548B: run_alarms (snmp_alarm.c:218)
==15824== by 0x804B9F4: main (snmpd.c:1372)
==15824==
==15824==
==15824== 73 (52 direct, 21 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 40 of 88
==15824== at 0x4021E22: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
==15824== by 0x40BCCFC: proc_v4 (pingCtlTable.c:1533)
==15824== by 0x40B8109: readloop (pingCtlTable.c:1319)
==15824== by 0x40BBBB2: run_ping (pingCtlTable.c:1727)
==15824== by 0x42D548B: run_alarms (snmp_alarm.c:218)
==15824== by 0x804B9F4: main (snmpd.c:1372)
==15824==
==15824==
==15824== 154 bytes in 14 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 43 of 88
==15824== at 0x4023D6E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
==15824== by 0x42C9242: memdup (tools.c:282)
==15824== by 0x40BC9BF: proc_v4 (pingCtlTable.c:1434)
==15824== by 0x40B8109: readloop (pingCtlTable.c:1319)
==15824== by 0x40BBBB2: run_ping (pingCtlTable.c:1727)
==15824== by 0x42D548B: run_alarms (snmp_alarm.c:218)
==15824== by 0x804B9F4: main (snmpd.c:1372)
==15824==
==15824==
==15824== 919 (576 direct, 343 indirect) bytes in 4 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 56 of 88
==15824== at 0x4021E22: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
==15824== by 0x40B7606: create_pingCtlTable_data (pingCtlTable.c:165)
==15824== by 0x40BE22B: write_pingCtlRowStatus (pingCtlTable.c:4194)
==15824== by 0x403CA26: netsnmp_old_api_helper (old_api.c:415)
==15824== by 0x4050862: netsnmp_call_handlers (agent_handler.c:526)
==15824== by 0x405AF2D: handle_var_requests (snmp_agent.c:2682)
==15824== by 0x405AFE5: handle_set (snmp_agent.c:3208)
==15824== by 0x405B2B9: handle_set_loop (snmp_agent.c:3224)
==15824== by 0x405CFE0: handle_pdu (snmp_agent.c:3469)
==15824== by 0x405F5E2: netsnmp_handle_request (snmp_agent.c:3284)
==15824== by 0x40602A3: handle_snmp_packet (snmp_agent.c:1993)
==15824== by 0x42B0082: _sess_process_packet (snmp_api.c:5395)
==15824==
==15824==
==15824== 3,640 bytes in 70 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 65 of 88
==15824== at 0x4021E22: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
==15824== by 0x40BC9D3: proc_v4 (pingCtlTable.c:1438)
==15824== by 0x40B8109: readloop (pingCtlTable.c:1319)
==15824== by 0x40BBBB2: run_ping (pingCtlTable.c:1727)
==15824== by 0x42D548B: run_alarms (snmp_alarm.c:218)
==15824== by 0x804B9F4: main (snmpd.c:1372)
==15824==
==15824==
==15824== 4,704 (1,176 direct, 3,528 indirect) bytes in 2 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 68 of 88
==15824== at 0x4021E22: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
==15824== by 0x40F1A39: mteTrigger_run (mteTrigger.c:242)
==15824== by 0x42D548B: run_alarms (snmp_alarm.c:218)
==15824== by 0x804B9F4: main (snmpd.c:1372)
==15824==
==15824==
==15824== 72,626 (35,868 direct, 36,758 indirect) bytes in 61 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 79 of 88
==15824== at 0x4021E22: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
==15824== by 0x42A093B: snmp_varlist_add_variable (snmp_api.c:6689)
==15824== by 0x40BE1C1: write_pingCtlRowStatus (pingCtlTable.c:4178)
==15824== by 0x403CA26: netsnmp_old_api_helper (old_api.c:415)
==15824== by 0x4050862: netsnmp_call_handlers (agent_handler.c:526)
==15824== by 0x405AF2D: handle_var_requests (snmp_agent.c:2682)
==15824== by 0x405AFE5: handle_set (snmp_agent.c:3208)
==15824== by 0x405B2B9: handle_set_loop (snmp_agent.c:3224)
==15824== by 0x405CFE0: handle_pdu (snmp_agent.c:3469)
==15824== by 0x405F5E2: netsnmp_handle_request (snmp_agent.c:3284)
==15824== by 0x40602A3: handle_snmp_packet (snmp_agent.c:1993)
==15824== by 0x42B0082: _sess_process_packet (snmp_api.c:5395)
==15824==
==15824==
==15824== 424,270 bytes in 38,571 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 87 of 88
==15824== at 0x4023D6E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
==15824== by 0x42C9242: memdup (tools.c:282)
==15824== by 0x40BC9BF: proc_v4 (pingCtlTable.c:1434)
==15824== by 0x40B8109: readloop (pingCtlTable.c:1319)
==15824== by 0x40BBBB2: run_ping (pingCtlTable.c:1727)
==15824== by 0x42D548B: run_alarms (snmp_alarm.c:218)
==15824== by 0x804B9F4: main (snmpd.c:1372)
==15824==
==15824==
==15824== 2,661,036 (1,874,912 direct, 786,124 indirect) bytes in 36,056 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 88 of 88
==15824== at 0x4021E22: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
==15824== by 0x40BC9D3: proc_v4 (pingCtlTable.c:1438)
==15824== by 0x40B8109: readloop (pingCtlTable.c:1319)
==15824== by 0x40BBBB2: run_ping (pingCtlTable.c:1727)
==15824== by 0x42D548B: run_alarms (snmp_alarm.c:218)
==15824== by 0x804B9F4: main (snmpd.c:1372)
==15824==
==15824== LEAK SUMMARY:
==15824== definitely lost: 2,336,854 bytes in 74,695 blocks.
==15824== indirectly lost: 826,774 bytes in 108,322 blocks.
==15824== possibly lost: 3,801 bytes in 85 blocks.
==15824== still reachable: 637,544 bytes in 16,683 blocks.
==15824== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
==15824== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
==15824== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment