Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@Whateverable
Created September 4, 2017 18:25
Show Gist options
  • Star 0 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save Whateverable/1eb7c70bb85340b147c6208158debf56 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save Whateverable/1eb7c70bb85340b147c6208158debf56 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
bisectable6
old=2017.07-209-g26287a1,new=HEAD say 42 eqv Match.new.made
Bisecting: 50 revisions left to test after this (roughly 6 steps)
[d8958fc37e86a921f3522e57b86c58b38a32959d] Merge pull request #1141 from Gnouc/nom
»»»»» Testing d8958fc37e86a921f3522e57b86c58b38a32959d
»»»»» Script output:
False
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 1
»»»»» Note that on “old” revision exit code is normally 0, you are probably trying to find when something was fixed
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 8944721366952e7c73ffb73e47186ea1d78bccd9
»»»»» Script output:
False
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 1
»»»»» Note that on “old” revision exit code is normally 0, you are probably trying to find when something was fixed
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 7a22d6cff3789df829d2d4d84c1f370ff593e1f7
»»»»» Script output:
Type check failed in binding to parameter '<anon>'; expected Any but got NQPMu (?)
in block <unit> at /tmp/3oCk_i8sOU line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 1, exit code on “old” revision is 1
»»»»» Note that on “old” revision exit code is normally 0, you are probably trying to find when something was fixed
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing d5aec61f549b147dfd689ca844e9ca7a53b5c312
»»»»» Script output:
Type check failed in binding to parameter '<anon>'; expected Any but got NQPMu (?)
in block <unit> at /tmp/3oCk_i8sOU line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 1, exit code on “old” revision is 1
»»»»» Note that on “old” revision exit code is normally 0, you are probably trying to find when something was fixed
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 0127c4238f70613cf0a96ed4077d1304a28eb137
»»»»» Script output:
Type check failed in binding to parameter '<anon>'; expected Any but got NQPMu (?)
in block <unit> at /tmp/3oCk_i8sOU line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 1, exit code on “old” revision is 1
»»»»» Note that on “old” revision exit code is normally 0, you are probably trying to find when something was fixed
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 5db5b1dbfa0b625130573574e2409972387e9f75
»»»»» Script output:
False
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 1
»»»»» Note that on “old” revision exit code is normally 0, you are probably trying to find when something was fixed
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 69a91d62a477525ec2bf6decc3f998d464a2428c
»»»»» Script output:
Type check failed in binding to parameter '<anon>'; expected Any but got NQPMu (?)
in block <unit> at /tmp/3oCk_i8sOU line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 1, exit code on “old” revision is 1
»»»»» Note that on “old” revision exit code is normally 0, you are probably trying to find when something was fixed
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5db5b1dbfa0b625130573574e2409972387e9f75 is the first new commit
commit 5db5b1dbfa0b625130573574e2409972387e9f75
Author: Elizabeth Mattijsen <liz@wenzperl.nl>
Date: Mon Aug 21 21:15:17 2017 +0200
Fix for RT #131936
Provide a HLL version of Match.(made|ast) that returns a Nil instead
of a lowlevel NQPMu. Wish there was a better way to test for NQPMu
though, as this will prevent type objects being properly propagated
by "make".
:040000 040000 2a7afca4a23596d7ee4881dd2f67c74fd3e52aa4 cc3a31b76991d89e1ffc6697602f851062404ea2 M src
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment