Created
March 29, 2012 09:53
-
-
Save gruby-karol/2235525 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Redis 2.2.11 vs 2.4.9 benchmark comparison
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I was making some presentation and wanted to show how fast Redis is (redis-benchmark), even on cheap laptop - 4GB RAM, 2core, Ubuntu (3.0.0-17-generic #30-Ubuntu SMP Thu Mar 8 20:45:39 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux). | |
I had Redis 2.2.11 installed then. | |
The number I got are: | |
MSET (10 keys) - 81300.81 rps | |
SET - 129870.13 rps | |
GET - 172413.80 rps | |
INCR - 178571.42 rps | |
LPUSH - 166666.67 rps | |
LPOP - 172413.80 rps | |
SADD - 175438.59 rps | |
SPOP - 169491.53 rps | |
LRANGE (first 100 elements) - 81300.81 rps | |
LRANGE (first 300 elements) - 37313.43 rps | |
LRANGE (first 450 elements) - 26881.72 rps | |
LRANGE (first 600 elements) - 21186.44 rps | |
Today I upgraded Redis to 2.4.9 and out of curiosity redid the benchmark. | |
Then new numbers are: | |
MSET (10 keys) - 85470.09 rps | |
SET - 169491.53 rps | |
GET - 172413.80 rps | |
INCR - 161290.33 rps | |
LPUSH - 175438.59 rps | |
LPOP - 169491.53 rps | |
SADD - 169491.53 rps | |
SPOP - 166666.67 rps | |
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements) - 63694.27 rps | |
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements) - 23419.21 rps | |
LRANGE_500 (first 450 elements) - 15673.98 rps | |
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements) - 9560.23 rps | |
====== MSET (10 keys) ====== | |
requests per second | |
Most figures show improvement, but LRANGE numbers are much worsen. | |
LRANGE_100: 81300.81 -> 63694.27 | |
LRANGE_300: 37313.43 -> 23419.21 | |
LRANGE_600: 21186.44 -> 9560.23 rps | |
Is it to be expected? Is it Ubuntu not doing well here? Can I tune something? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment