Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@Whateverable
Created September 1, 2017 02:38
Show Gist options
  • Star 0 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save Whateverable/39a5a926eaea37a04145b46de728a87f to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save Whateverable/39a5a926eaea37a04145b46de728a87f to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
bisectable6
old=2014.12 sub prefix:["∓"] ($thing) { return "AROUND$thing"; }; exit(∓43 ne "AROUND43")
Bisecting: 5140 revisions left to test after this (roughly 12 steps)
[ebf89c51e1d9ba3ae6293d64c901c985f3a5032e] Merge branch 'nom' of https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo into failure.handled
»»»»» Testing ebf89c51e1d9ba3ae6293d64c901c985f3a5032e
»»»»» Script output:
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 1
»»»»» Note that on “old” revision exit code is normally 0, you are probably trying to find when something was fixed
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 3bb6333783780bed7342c871ae05a04327325088
»»»»» Script output:
===SORRY!===
Cannot find method 'ast'
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 1, exit code on “old” revision is 1
»»»»» Note that on “old” revision exit code is normally 0, you are probably trying to find when something was fixed
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing c668b5ffc1cce11501f6fe69f41736104afb5684
»»»»» Script output:
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 1
»»»»» Note that on “old” revision exit code is normally 0, you are probably trying to find when something was fixed
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing ecdf8152b6272d576a2dda0f5c4163eeca56897b
»»»»» Script output:
===SORRY!===
Cannot find method 'ast'
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 1, exit code on “old” revision is 1
»»»»» Note that on “old” revision exit code is normally 0, you are probably trying to find when something was fixed
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing f931261fdb1b3e34412f2d159e8c6201789eb36f
»»»»» Script output:
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 1
»»»»» Note that on “old” revision exit code is normally 0, you are probably trying to find when something was fixed
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing bff29c46317efa9e98f1353e7c6cb0497aad1253
»»»»» Script output:
===SORRY!===
Cannot find method 'ast'
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 1, exit code on “old” revision is 1
»»»»» Note that on “old” revision exit code is normally 0, you are probably trying to find when something was fixed
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing ef814c33bb87edce70f9071e14ab5bb5150b52c5
»»»»» Script output:
===SORRY!===
Cannot find method 'ast'
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 1, exit code on “old” revision is 1
»»»»» Note that on “old” revision exit code is normally 0, you are probably trying to find when something was fixed
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 462ab13b1d358ad819078e1a7602cb24e69cc9ed
»»»»» Script output:
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 1
»»»»» Note that on “old” revision exit code is normally 0, you are probably trying to find when something was fixed
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 07c5694670013a3ab5991fbdfd4bd8c03ddc4981
»»»»» Script output:
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 1
»»»»» Note that on “old” revision exit code is normally 0, you are probably trying to find when something was fixed
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing b06d30decf4d4341818b039a095e09fbb5e9bf94
»»»»» Script output:
===SORRY!===
Cannot find method 'ast'
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 1, exit code on “old” revision is 1
»»»»» Note that on “old” revision exit code is normally 0, you are probably trying to find when something was fixed
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing efbd9ca12bf6f9383a5912d6d956dc3f76a0f81a
»»»»» Script output:
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 1
»»»»» Note that on “old” revision exit code is normally 0, you are probably trying to find when something was fixed
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing d0885e56e8fe1c2cd280e419ab3edfb9afe3443c
»»»»» Script output:
»»»»» Script exit code: 0
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 0, exit code on “old” revision is 1
»»»»» Note that on “old” revision exit code is normally 0, you are probably trying to find when something was fixed
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 53b8878c95da314913363b5442e8a6772d630660
»»»»» Script output:
===SORRY!===
Cannot find method 'ast'
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by exit code
»»»»» Current exit code is 1, exit code on “old” revision is 1
»»»»» Note that on “old” revision exit code is normally 0, you are probably trying to find when something was fixed
»»»»» If exit code is not the same as on “old” revision, this revision will be marked as “new”
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
d0885e56e8fe1c2cd280e419ab3edfb9afe3443c is the first new commit
commit d0885e56e8fe1c2cd280e419ab3edfb9afe3443c
Author: Pepe Schwarz <peschwa@gmail.com>
Date: Sun Oct 4 12:32:58 2015 +0000
Implement bracket-delimited categorical sub declarations.
This fixes RT #119919. RT #117737 is related and still behaves the same, which
I would argue as correct in the first place - a bare regexp that matches a
single character is not a useful enough compile-time value to declare an
operator with. I've added a typed exception to be thrown in that case though.
:040000 040000 91cf4fc5ed2811a9b0e855024ceffe31b3df6b12 f1844f8f514a385f1d09767ec1c4e2f274744657 M src
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment