Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@Whateverable
Created January 27, 2017 01:50
Show Gist options
  • Star 0 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save Whateverable/738cbc60184af8bfe3c55c9fe7ae6de4 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save Whateverable/738cbc60184af8bfe3c55c9fe7ae6de4 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
bisectable6
old=2016.12 new=HEAD $++ for '/home/bisectable/.bash_history'.IO.lines.batch(30)
Bisecting: 232 revisions left to test after this (roughly 8 steps)
[964b28be834c1e56ff1fcf16e8c49d5fa50011f7] Merge pull request #990 from MasterDuke17
»»»»» Testing 964b28be834c1e56ff1fcf16e8c49d5fa50011f7
»»»»» Script output:
No such method 'batch' for invocant of type 'Seq'
in block <unit> at /tmp/o7YzpRgeDR line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
No such method 'batch' for invocant of type 'Seq'
in block <unit> at /tmp/o7YzpRgeDR line 1
»»»»» The output is identical
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 9537ccd87a8d2efd266f7a188861d22632b435a2
»»»»» Script output:
No such method 'batch' for invocant of type 'Seq'
in block <unit> at /tmp/o7YzpRgeDR line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
No such method 'batch' for invocant of type 'Seq'
in block <unit> at /tmp/o7YzpRgeDR line 1
»»»»» The output is identical
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 4a295dc5fbaff890053789838662b1154e3d2b49
»»»»» Script output:
No such method 'batch' for invocant of type 'Seq'
in block <unit> at /tmp/o7YzpRgeDR line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
No such method 'batch' for invocant of type 'Seq'
in block <unit> at /tmp/o7YzpRgeDR line 1
»»»»» The output is identical
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 8733aa515732ce6319ac52b8a49af4f53d1be2b1
»»»»» Script output:
readline requires an object with REPR MVMOSHandle
in block <unit> at /tmp/o7YzpRgeDR line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
No such method 'batch' for invocant of type 'Seq'
in block <unit> at /tmp/o7YzpRgeDR line 1
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 15753fd3c34d16ffa3dead1b3708ef8a945ad287
»»»»» Script output:
No such method 'batch' for invocant of type 'Seq'
in block <unit> at /tmp/o7YzpRgeDR line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
No such method 'batch' for invocant of type 'Seq'
in block <unit> at /tmp/o7YzpRgeDR line 1
»»»»» The output is identical
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 3a4b26283bf97684dade883578fe608807e0bcb7
»»»»» Script output:
readline requires an object with REPR MVMOSHandle
in block <unit> at /tmp/o7YzpRgeDR line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
No such method 'batch' for invocant of type 'Seq'
in block <unit> at /tmp/o7YzpRgeDR line 1
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing e0201f15dffcef82af8750a3d8ca77341b0a8e7f
»»»»» Script output:
readline requires an object with REPR MVMOSHandle
in block <unit> at /tmp/o7YzpRgeDR line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
No such method 'batch' for invocant of type 'Seq'
in block <unit> at /tmp/o7YzpRgeDR line 1
»»»»» The output is different
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “new”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
»»»»» Testing 8a448d4c636c5c1d9ee851868ad6405d797982d3
»»»»» Script output:
No such method 'batch' for invocant of type 'Seq'
in block <unit> at /tmp/o7YzpRgeDR line 1
»»»»» Script exit code: 1
»»»»» Bisecting by output
»»»»» Output on “old” revision is:
No such method 'batch' for invocant of type 'Seq'
in block <unit> at /tmp/o7YzpRgeDR line 1
»»»»» The output is identical
»»»»» Therefore, marking this revision as “old”
»»»»» -------------------------------------------------------------------------
e0201f15dffcef82af8750a3d8ca77341b0a8e7f is the first new commit
commit e0201f15dffcef82af8750a3d8ca77341b0a8e7f
Author: Elizabeth Mattijsen <liz@dijkmat.nl>
Date: Sun Jan 22 20:50:36 2017 +0100
Introducing Any.batch(n)
Since Supply has a .batch, I figured we should probably also have an
Any.batch, just to keep the balance :-)
:040000 040000 f262b3c9bc3a1b62fcb3961259534ff290430f5b 7d25c19c41ec9f8f60fccc910d2a8697ae146136 M src
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment